Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;95:1207-1213

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T.

(Circulation. 1997;95:1207-1213.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Apical Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects Between the Left Ventricle and the Right Ventricular Infundibulum

Diagnostic and Interventional Considerations

Krishna Kumar, MD; James E. Lock, MD; Tal Geva, MD

the Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Tal Geva, MD, Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail geva_t{at}a1.tch.harvard.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Effective transcatheter or surgical closure of apical muscular ventricular septal defects (VSDs) requires accurate delineation of variable and often complex anatomy. These defects have generally been considered as communications between the apexes of both left and right ventricles.

Methods and Results Among 50 consecutive patients with multiple muscular VSDs referred for transcatheter device closure between October 1987 and April 1993, a subset of 10 patients (aged 7 days to 28 years) with apical muscular VSDs shared a unique set of anatomic characteristics: (1) large and often single opening in the left ventricle; (2) multiple right ventricular openings in the anterior aspect of the apical septum; and (3) separation of the right ventricular apical region into which the VSDs open from the rest of the right ventricular inflow and outflow by prominent muscle bundles. Additional analysis of the anatomy by use of echocardiography and cineangiography showed that these muscular defects were between the left ventricular apex and right ventricular infundibular apex. In 6 patients, the transcatheter devices used to create a septum in these hearts were placed in the right ventricle, straddling muscle bundles that separated the apical VSD from the rest of the right ventricular inflow and outflow, resulting in incorporation of a portion of the right ventricular infundibular apex into the physiological left ventricle. Three patients had devices placed between the apexes of the left ventricle and the infundibulum. The defect closed spontaneously within the right ventricle in 1 patient. One patient died after surgery for tetralogy of Fallot in situs inversus. The remaining 9 patients were all clinically well at the time of their most recent follow-up visit (follow-up duration, 32±11 months). This distinct type of apical VSD was identified by echocardiography in 20 of 274 patients who were followed up clinically for muscular VSDs.

Conclusions Left ventricular–infundibular apical VSDs constitute a distinct morphological type of muscular VSD that can be distinguished by echocardiography and cineangiography. In selected cases, the infundibular apex can be separated from the rest of the right ventricular inflow and outflow to eliminate flow across these defects.


Key Words: heart defects, congenital • catheterization • echocardiography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The anatomy of apical muscular ventricular septal defects (VSDs) is often complex, with several openings on either side of the septum and an oblique and tortuous intraseptal course.1 2 Although many of these defects are small and close spontaneously,3 the larger defects often persist to cause significant shunt and right ventricular (RV) hypertension. Large apical muscular VSDs complicate management decisions, particularly when they occur in association with other congenital cardiac defects.2 4 The results of surgery for apical muscular VSDs are often suboptimal owing to difficulties in defect visualization, residual shunting, and ventricular dysfunction.2 5 6 Transcatheter device closure has recently emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with muscular VSDs.4 7 Accurate delineation of anatomic details of the apical region, the number and location of defects, their origin and exit on the left ventricular (LV) and RV aspects, and their relationships with neighboring muscle bundles or valvular apparatus are important for effective transcatheter therapy.

Apical VSDs have generally been considered as defects between apexes of both the LV and the RV.1 5 It has not been well appreciated, however, that what is generally regarded as "RV apex" is composed of two distinct apexes that are separated by multiple dense trabeculae coursing from the interventricular septum toward the anterior free wall. Posterior and to the right of this plane of trabeculae is the apex of the RV inflow, and anterior and leftward is the apex of the RV infundibulum. Among the patients who underwent transcatheter device closure for muscular VSDs at Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass, a subset of patients with apical muscular VSDs who had distinct echocardiographic and cineangiographic features was identified. The VSDs resulted from a defect in the septum separating the RV infundibular apex from the LV apex. This report describes the echocardiographic and cineangiographic features of this subset of patients, the specific strategies used for transcatheter device closure, and the incidence of this type of VSD in a consecutive group of patients followed up clinically for muscular VSDs.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Selection
The echocardiograms, cineangiograms, and clinical records of all patients undergoing transcatheter device closure for muscular VSDs between October 1987 and April 1993 were reviewed. Patients with apical muscular defects who had the following distinct characteristics were identified: (1) single or multiple openings in the anterior aspect of the RV septum near or at the apex; and (2) presence of prominent RV apical muscle bundles resulting in separation of the RV infundibular apex (into which the VSDs open) from the rest of the RV cavity.

Echocardiographic Evaluation
Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiograms were performed on all patients before and after cardiac catheterization with pulsed and color Doppler according to a previously described protocol.8 Images of the ventricular septum were obtained from subxiphoid, apical, and parasternal views. Particular attention was given to the location of the defect(s) on the RV and LV aspects, the number of defects, their relationship with neighboring structures, and the flow pattern and velocity. In addition, transesophageal echocardiograms were performed in patients with suboptimal transthoracic windows and during transcatheter closure to guide device placement. The methodology for transesophageal echocardiographic guidance during transcatheter device closure of muscular VSDs has been reported previously.9 10

To determine the frequency of this particular type of apical VSD in an unselected population, all echocardiograms of patients diagnosed with muscular septal defect(s) from January 1995 through March 1996 at Children's Hospital (n=274) were reviewed.

Hemodynamic and Cineangiographic Evaluation
Catheterization of the right and left sides of the heart was performed in each patient, and the size, location, and configuration of suspected or previously identified defects were defined angiographically. Multiple angled views profiled the defects, displaying their geometry and relation to surrounding structures.7

Management
Transcatheter device closure was considered if it was believed that the apical defect was hemodynamically significant and operative closure would be difficult in view of the location of the defect or condition of the patient. The decision to attempt a transcatheter closure was made jointly by the patients' cardiologists and the cardiac surgeons. Informed consent was obtained in all cases, and device placements were performed under protocols approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Committee on Clinical Investigation at Children's Hospital or were done as emergency procedures. The technique of device placement for apical muscular VSD has been described previously.4 7 11 The decision on where to place the device depended on an arbitrary judgment as to where closure might best be accomplished. Thus, if the musculature separating the infundibular apex from the rest of the RV inflow and outflow was perforated by only one or two discrete openings and the apical septum was highly deficient, the device(s) was placed within the RV straddling the infundibular trabeculae. After device placement, residual shunts were assessed qualitatively by angiography and two-dimensional and color Doppler echocardiography. The ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow was not used to quantify residual shunt because of the common occurrence of associated defects. It was believed that accurate and reproducible measurements of the size of the apical VSDs could not be accomplished because the complex three-dimensional anatomy of these defects made it difficult to identify and standardize imaging planes for echocardiographic or angiographic measurements.

Terminology
VSDs were classified according to published nomenclature.12 Additional terms used in the present study are shown in Fig 1Down and defined below.





View larger version (324K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Open right ventricle (RV) of a normal heart specimen showing the distinction between the apex of the RV sinus (apex of RV inflow) and the infundibular apex. B, The infundibular apex (Inf Apex) has been dissected open and shown to lie just above the apex of the RV inflow. C, A waxed specimen of a normal heart viewed from above. The RV infundibular apical cavity can be seen along with the adjacent apical trabeculae. Ao indicates aorta; MB, moderator band; PV, pulmonary valve; PB, parietal band; PA, pulmonary artery; RAA, right atrial appendage; SB, septal band; SVC, superior vena cava; and TV, tricuspid valve. (A and B are reproduced with permission from Van Praagh et al.13 )

Apex of the right ventricular inflow:
the most apical part of the RV inflow cavity (RV sinus) located behind and below the moderator band (Fig 1AUp).

Infundibular apex (also known as the infundibular apical recess):
located anterior to and left of the apex of the RV inflow and separated from it by a plane of trabeculae that includes the moderator band in its most superior aspect13 (Fig 1B and 1CUpUp).

Apical-infundibular septum:
the part of the ventricular septum that separates the LV apex from the RV infundibular apex13 (Fig 1BUp). Defects in this septum have been termed LV-infundibular apical septal defects.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Between October 1987 and April 1993, 10 patients (age, 7 days to 28 years; median, 2 years) were identified as having apical muscular VSDs between the LV apex and the infundibular apex. Seven patients had additional congenital cardiac defects requiring surgery (Table 1Down). These included D-transposition of the great arteries (n=3), tetralogy of Fallot in situs inversus (n=1), and mitral stenosis (n=1). Two patients were identical twins with Holt-Oram syndrome, each of whom had an atrial septal defect and a large conoventricular septal defect. Nine patients had muscular defects in other parts of the ventricular septum in addition to the apical defects (Table 1Down). Previous palliative operations (pulmonary artery band, n=7; modified Blalock-Taussig shunts, n=1) were performed in 8 patients, and 1 patient had undergone the arterial switch operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. One patient had previously undergone balloon mitral valvuloplasty. In all but 1 patient, transcatheter closure was performed before definitive surgical repair as part of an integrated surgical-transcatheter approach to repair the complex congenital heart disease (Table 2Down). Because most patients had either undergone a prior pulmonary artery banding or had obstruction to pulmonary blood flow as part of their congenital heart disease, transcatheter closure was chosen primarily on the basis of anatomic and physiological considerations rather than the patient's preoperative clinical symptomatic state.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Results of Transcatheter Device Closure

Echocardiographic Evaluation
The anatomic features of the apical defects were best delineated from the subxiphoid and parasternal short-axis and apical views. In addition, six patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography during cardiac catheterization to assist in device placement. The following anatomic features were identified by echocardiography as characteristics of LV-infundibular apical defects:

1. LV aspect: a single opening was seen in six patients. Multiple anterior LV openings were demonstrated in one patient (patient 1) who died after surgery. In three patients (patients 3, 7, and 8), defects were located both in the anterior (infundibular-apical septum) as well as the posterior parts of the apical septum (septum between RV inflow apex and the LV apex).

2. RV aspect: multiple openings were seen in the infundibular apical region in all patients. The moderator band and the more apical trabeculae were hypertrophied, unusually dense, and formed a barrier that separated the infundibular apex and the defect(s) from the rest of the RV cavity. This unusually dense and hypertrophied band created the appearance of a separate "septum" within the RV (Figs 2ADown and 3Down).





View larger version (506K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Transthoracic echocardiographic imaging of left ventricular (LV)–infundibular apical ventricular septal defect (VSD). A, Apical four-chamber view demonstrating the apical trabeculae that form a barrier between the VSD and the right ventricular (RV) infundibular apex on one side and the RV sinus on the other (patient 5). B, Magnified subxiphoid short-axis view apical to the moderator band (patient 8) showing the three chambers that compose the cardiac apex: RV infundibular apex (Inf. apex), apex of the RV sinus (RV apex), and the LV apex (LV). C, In contrast to LV-infundibular VSD, apical defects between the LV apex and the RV inflow apex are located in the posterior and rightward aspect of the apical septum. R indicates right; S/P, superior/posterior; A, anterior; S/L, superior/left; and L, left.






View larger version (568K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Angiograms obtained from patient 2 before (A) and after (B) device placement in the right ventricular infundibular apex (Inf Apex), resulting in incorporation of the infundibular apex as a part of the left ventricle (LV) (cineangiographic images from this patient were published previously4 ). C and D (from patient 6) demonstrate the same phenomenon occurring as a result of spontaneous closure (the arrow indicates the site of spontaneous closure within the right ventricle [RV]). The asterisk indicates an additional midmuscular ventricular septal defect (VSD) that was closed intraoperatively by a device.

Prevalence of LV-Infundibular Apical VSD
Of the 274 consecutive patients with muscular VSD diagnosed by echocardiography, 47 patients (mean age, 1.4 years; range, 0 to 13.1 years) had one or more defects in the apical region. Of these 47 patients, 20 (43%) had an LV-infundibular defect (Fig 2BUp) and 21 (45%) had a defect between the apexes of the LV and RV sinuses (Fig 2CUp). In 2 patients, there were defects between the LV apex and both the infundibular apex and the RV sinus apex. In 4 patients, the images were inconclusive. Among the 20 patients with LV-infundibular VSD, the defect was small in 13 patients (65%) and either closed spontaneously or was believed to be hemodynamically insignificant during follow-up. Of the 7 patients with a moderate or large defect, diminution of the size of the defect was found by echocardiography in 5 patients, operative closure in 1 patient, and a modified Fontan operation for single-ventricle physiology in 1 patient.

Cineangiographic Evaluation
The cineangiographic features were best outlined through contrast injections in the region of the VSD (using a cutoff pigtail catheter mounted over a wire placed across the VSD). The above-described echocardiographic features were best demonstrated in steep, cranially angled, left anterior oblique views (Fig 3Up). The precise angles for angiographic delineation of these defects were arrived at by trial and error and differed for each patient. In addition, cineangiograms demonstrated that the region of prominent muscle bundles separating the infundibular apex and defect(s) from the rest of the RV inflow and outflow was often narrower than the defect in the infundibular apical septum.

Transcatheter Closure
The results of transcatheter device closure are summarized in Table 2Up. A single device was used to close the apical muscular defects in four patients (patients 1, 4, 5, and 8); two devices were used in four patients (patients 2, 3, 7, and 10), and three devices were used in one patient (patient 9). Six patients (patients 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) required device placement in muscular VSDs at other locations (anterior and posterior midmuscular). In six patients (patients 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 10), the device was placed in the RV at the narrowest part of the defect straddling the muscle bundles that separated the infundibular apex and the VSD from the rest of the RV inflow and outflow. This resulted in incorporation of the infundibular apex as a part of the physiological left ventricle (Figs 3 and 4UpDown). The device was placed between the apexes of the LV and the infundibulum in two patients (patients 3 and 8) (Fig 5Down). Additional devices were placed within the infundibular apex in four patients (patients 2, 3, 7, and 9). One patient (patient 6) had spontaneous closure of a moderately sized interventricular communication documented by serial cineangiograms (Fig 3C and 3DUpUp). The site of spontaneous closure was within the RV at the level of the moderator band, resulting in the physiological incorporation of the RV infundibular apex into the LV.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Subxiphoid short-axis view before (A) and after (B) placement of a clamshell device in patient 8. The clamshell device (labeled "D") is seen in the right ventricular (RV) cavity straddling the trabeculae separating the infundibular apex from the rest of the RV. Notice that the device is seen exclusively in the RV (the infundibular apex is not seen in this plane because it is more apical). The arrow indicates left ventricular–infundibular ventricular septal defect. Inf indicates infundibulum; A, anterior; S, superior.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Angiogram obtained from patient 3 demonstrating device placement in the septum between the left ventricular (LV) apex and the infundibular apex. A, The ventricular septal defect (*) is seen between the LV apex (white arrow) and the infundibular apex (black arrow). B, One set of arms of the clamshell device is in the LV (white arrows) and another set of arms is in the infundibular apex (black arrows). RV indicates right ventricle.

Immediately after transcatheter device placement, angiographic evidence of a small residual defect was seen in eight patients, and two patients had a moderate residual defect. Eight patients underwent surgery after device placement that included a Rastelli-type repair (n=2), pulmonary arterial band takedown (alone [n=3] or in combination with arterial switch operation [n=1]), or closure of a conoventricular septal defect (n=2). One patient (patient 6) underwent balloon dilation of supravalvar pulmonary stenosis after an arterial switch operation (Table 2Up).

Follow-up
One patient (patient 1) died after attempted repair of tetralogy of Fallot in situs inversus after device placement. The remaining nine patients were all clinically well at the time of the last follow-up visit (32±11 months). The most recent follow-up echocardiograms showed that the residual interventricular communications at the device margins were small in all patients (Table 2Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although a significant proportion of muscular VSDs are located in the apical region, little published work is available regarding the variant anatomy of apical muscular VSDs. Despite their complexity, apical muscular VSDs have been considered to be one category of lesions; anatomic heterogeneity within this class of defects is not generally appreciated.1 5 12 Much of the anatomic complexity of the RV apex results from numerous trabeculae that traverse its cavity from the interventricular septum toward the anterior free wall. The moderator band is the largest and the most superior of these trabeculae. These trabeculae are aligned, to a large extent, along a plane that separates the apex of the RV sinus (or inflow) from the apex of the infundibulum (Fig 1Up). The infundibular apex is located anterosuperior and leftward of the apex of the RV sinus and constitutes the lowermost part of the infundibular chamber (Fig 1A and 1BUpUp). Viewed from above, it has the shape of an inverted cone (Fig 1CUp). Its anterior free wall is continuous with the free wall of the RV. Its posterior surface is formed by the trabeculae of the RV apex (including the moderator band), and its leftward aspect is constituted by the apical interventricular septum. When viewed from the RV aspect, the apical portion of the ventricular septum is constituted by an anterosuperior infundibular apical component and a posteroinferior sinus component (Fig 1Up). This distinction between the two components of the apical septum, however, is much less obvious when viewed from the LV.

This study identified 10 patients with apical muscular VSDs in whom the defects were located in the infundibular component of the apical septum among the 50 patients referred for transcatheter closure of muscular VSDs. Such defects result in a communication between the apex of the LV and the infundibular apex and have been termed LV-infundibular apical VSDs. The prevalence of LV-infundibular apical VSD among 274 consecutive patients with muscular VSD was 7.3%. This type of defect made up 43% of apical VSDs.

Imaging Considerations
The anatomic features of LV-infundibular apical defects could be clearly demonstrated with the use of echocardiography and cineangiography. The subxiphoid and parasternal short-axis views of the ventricular apexes demonstrated the relationship between the LV apex, the apex of the RV sinus, and the infundibular apex (Fig 2BUp). The moderator band and the more caudal apical trabeculae formed a barrier separating the apexes of the RV sinus and infundibulum. Defects in the infundibular and sinus components of the apical interventricular septum could be clearly identified in these views by high-resolution imaging and slow sweeps from base to apex and back (Fig 2BUp). As the imaging sector is swept toward the cardiac apex past the AV valves and chordae tendineae, the moderator band and the more apical trabeculae are seen to traverse between the RV septal surface and anterior free wall. Defects between LV apex and infundibular apex are seen anterior to and leftward of the apical trabeculae (Fig 2BUp), whereas defects between LV apex and RV sinus apex are seen posterior to and rightward of the apical trabeculae (Fig 2CUp). The apical four- and two-chamber views complemented the information obtained from the short-axis views by demonstrating the superoinferior extent of the infundibular apex (Fig 2AUp). In all patients, the apical trabeculae were hypertrophied and created an appearance of a separate septum within the RV apex. The cineangiographic features were outlined by use of steep left anterior oblique views that produce an image similar to the apical views of the echocardiograms. In this projection, the appearance of an additional septum within the RV apex became apparent.

Implications for Transcatheter and Surgical Closure
Identification of this subset of LV-infundibular apical muscular VSDs may allow consideration of specific transcatheter closure strategies and may similarly influence surgical management. The barrier formed by the apical trabeculae that separated the infundibular apex, including the defect in the infundibular-apical septum, from the rest of the RV cavity resulted in several potential sites for device placement. As a result of hypertrophy of the apical trabeculae, the narrowest part of the interventricular communication is often located within the RV at the level of the moderator band. In six patients, partial or complete closure of the interventricular communication was accomplished by placing one or more devices at the level of the moderator band and within the RV infundibular apex. As a result, the infundibular apex became part of the physiological LV (Fig 3A and 3BUpUp). Interestingly, this phenomenon occurred naturally in the patient who had spontaneous closure (Fig 3C and 3DUpUp). In contrast to LV-infundibular apical defects, anterior muscular defects occur cephalad to the moderator band and are not potentially isolated from the rest of the RV. Transcatheter or surgical closure can also be achieved by closing the plane between the LV septal apex and the infundibular apex. This can potentially be accomplished through a small incision in the infundibular apical free wall that lies to the right of the LV apex, exposing the infundibular septal surface and allowing patch closure of the apical defect.

In conclusion, defects in the interventricular septum separating the infundibular apex from the LV apex seem to constitute a distinct morphological type of muscular VSD. An appreciation of the anatomic basis of these defects and accurate diagnosis by echocardiography and cineangiography allow planning for the most effective closure technique. In patients with small defects, no intervention is necessary, and in selected patients with hemodynamically significant defects, transcatheter device placement is an effective method for "physiological" closure.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Jacqueline Kreutzer, MD, for her useful comments and William McIntosh and Emily Flynn McIntosh for artwork.

Received July 23, 1996; revision received October 16, 1996; accepted October 28, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Graham TP, Gutgesell HP. Ventricular septal defects. In: Emmanouilides GC, Allen HP, Reimenschneider TA, Gutgesell HP, eds. Moss and Adam's Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 5th ed. Baltimore, Md: William & Wilkins; 1995:724-746.

2. Castaneda AR, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Hanley FL, eds. Cardiac Surgery in the Neonate and the Infant. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1994:187-201.

3. Shirali GS, Smith EO, Geva T. Quantitation of echocardiographic predictors of outcome in infants with isolated ventricular septal defect. Am Heart J. 1995;130:1228-1235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Bridges ND, Perry SB, Keane JF, Goldstein SAN, Mandell V, Mayer JE, Jonas RA, Castaneda AR, Lock JE. Preoperative transcatheter closure of congenital muscular septal defects. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1312-1317.[Abstract]

5. Kirklin JW, Barrat-Boyes BG, eds. Cardiac Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:749-824.

6. Griffith SP, Turi GK, Ellis K, Krongrad E, Swift LH, Gersony WM, Bowman FO Jr, Malm JR. Muscular ventricular defects repaired with left ventriculotomy. Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:877-886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Lock JE, Block PC, McKay RG, Baim DS, Keane JF. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects. Circulation. 1988;78:361-368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Spevak PJ, Mandell VS, Colan SD, van der Velde ME, Jonas RA, Lock JE, Sanders SP. Reliability of Doppler color flow mapping in the identification and localization of multiple ventricular septal defects. Echocardiography. 1993;10:573-581.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. van der Velde ME, Perry SB, Sanders SP. Transesophageal echocardiography with color Doppler during interventional catheterization. Echocardiography. 1991;8:721-730.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. van der Velde ME, Sanders SP, Keane JF, Perry SB, Lock JE. Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter ventricular septal defect closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1660-1665.[Abstract]

11. O'Laughin MP, Mullins CE. Transcatheter occlusion of ventricular septal defects. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;17:175-179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Van Praagh R, Geva T, Kreutzer J. Ventricular septal defects: how shall we describe, name and classify them? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1291-1297.[Abstract]

13. Van Praagh R, Plett JA, Van Praagh S. Single ventricle. Herz. 1979;4:113-150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. L. Knauth, J. E. Lock, S. B. Perry, D. B. McElhinney, K. Gauvreau, M. J. Landzberg, J. J. Rome, W. E. Hellenbrand, C. E. Ruiz, and K. J. Jenkins
Transcatheter Device Closure of Congenital and Postoperative Residual Ventricular Septal Defects
Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 501 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Myhre, B. W. Duncan, R. B. B. Mee, R. Joshi, S. G. Seshadri, O. Herrera-Verdugo, and G. L. Rosenthal
Apical right ventriculotomy for closure of apical ventricular septal defects
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 204 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Sivakumar, S. R. Anil, S. G. Rao, K. Shivaprakash, and R. K. Kumar
Closure of muscular ventricular septal defects guided by en face reconstruction and pictorial representation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 158 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Van Praagh, J. E. Mayer Jr, N. B. Berman, M. F. Flanagan, T. Geva, and R. Van Praagh
Apical ventricular septal defects: follow-up concerning anatomic and surgical considerations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 48 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. T. Tsang, T.-Y. Hsia, R. W.M. Yates, and R. H. Anderson
Surgical repair of supposedly multiple defects within the apical part of the muscular ventricular septum
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 58 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Fraisse, P. J. del Nido, J. Gaudart, and T. Geva
Echocardiographic characteristics and outcome of straddling mitral valve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 819 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Okubo, L. N. Benson, D. Nykanen, A. Azakie, G. Van Arsdell, J. Coles, and W. G. Williams
Outcomes of intraoperative device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 416 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Stellin, M. Padalino, O. Milanesi, M. Rubino, D. Casarotto, R. Van Praagh, and S. Van Praagh
Surgical closure of apical ventricular septal defects through a right ventricular apical infundibulotomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 597 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. F. Merrick, M. Lal, R. H. Anderson, and D. F. Shore
Management of ventricular septal defect: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 983 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Mace, P. Dervanian, E. Le Bret, T. A. Folliguet, V. Lambert, J. Losay, and J.-Y. Neveux
""Swiss cheese"" septal defects: surgical closure using a single patch with intermediate fixings
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1754 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. D. Thanopoulos, G. S. Tsaousis, G. N. Konstadopoulou, and A. G. Zarayelyan
Transcatheter closure of muscular ventricular septal defects with the amplatzer ventricular septal defect occluder: initial clinical applications in children
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1395 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Seddio, V. M. Reddy, D. B. McElhinney, W. Tworetzky, N. H. Silverman, and F. L. Hanley
MULTIPLE VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECTS: HOW AND WHEN SHOULD THEY BE REPAIRED?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1999; 117(1): 134 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Geva, A. J. Powell, E. C. Crawford, T. Chung, and S. D. Colan
Evaluation of Regional Differences in Right Ventricular Systolic Function by Acoustic Quantification Echocardiography and Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Circulation, July 28, 1998; 98(4): 339 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Geva, T.