| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1997;95:1433-1440.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Greater Incidence of Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction Among Mexican Americans Than Non-Hispanic Whites
The Corpus Christi Heart Project, 1988-1992
From the Epidemiology Research Center, The University of Texas Houston Health Science Center, School of Public Health.
Correspondence to Milton Z. Nichaman, MD, ScD, Epidemiology Research Center, The University of Texas Houston Health Science Center School of Public Health, PO Box 20186, Houston, TX 77225. E-mail mzn{at}utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Background Since Mexican Americans have adverse patterns of risk factors for myocardial infarction relative to non-Hispanic whites, the incidence of myocardial infarction should be greater among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites. This expectation conflicts with reports generated from death certificate registries.
Methods and Results Data regarding myocardial infarction attacks and incident events were collected for a 4-year period in the Corpus Christi Heart Project, a population-based surveillance project for hospitalized coronary heart disease events. For both women and men, Mexican Americans experienced greater hospitalization rates for both attacks and incident events than non-Hispanic whites. Age-adjusted attack rate ratios comparing Mexican Americans with non-Hispanic whites were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.05 to 2.41) and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.45) among women and men, respectively. Corresponding incidence ratios were 1.52 (95% CI, 1.28 to 1.80) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.42).
Conclusions This is the first report documenting greater incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites, a biologically plausible finding given the risk factor patterns observed in the Mexican-American population. Public health planners and clinicians should be aware of the importance of myocardial infarction as a health problem in the Mexican-American population. Culturally appropriate prevention strategies should be developed for and tested in Mexican-American populations.
Key Words: myocardial infarction • epidemiology • registries • men • women
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
On the basis of their cardiovascular risk factor profiles, Mexican Americans would be expected to have a greater incidence of myocardial infarction than non-Hispanic whites.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Preliminary results of the Corpus Christi Heart Project (CCHP) supported this expectation; however, that report was based on data regarding a combined end point of incident and recurrent myocardial infarction hospitalizations during a 12-month period.20 To examine this hypothesis more rigorously, age-adjusted and sex-specific rates and rate ratios for hospitalization for first myocardial infarction are compared between these two ethnic groups over a 48-month period.
Only very limited information is available concerning the natural history of coronary heart disease among US Hispanics, the nation's second largest minority group, of which Mexican Americans constitute a large component. On the basis of vital statistics studies, mortality from coronary heart disease has been reported to be lower among Mexican Americans than among other Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations in the United States.21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Reported trends in mortality rates for coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction are inconsistent. Several reports indicated that mortality may have declined less among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites.24 27 28 However, at least one report showed similar declines for both ethnic groups.29 Two studies of the prevalence of myocardial infarction have indicated similar or lower prevalence among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites30 31 ; however, comparisons based on prevalence could reflect ethnic differences in myocardial infarction case-fatality. Early results from the CCHP indicated greater 28-day case-fatality after myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites32 33 ; therefore, lower prevalence in Mexican Americans does not necessarily indicate lower incidence.
To investigate the apparent inconsistency between the expected higher rate of incidence of myocardial infarction based on risk factor distributions and observations from vital statistics registries, a community surveillance system for coronary events was established. The CCHP was designed to elucidate certain critical components of the natural history of coronary heart disease as it occurs in two distinct and contrasting populations, Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites, within the single community of Corpus Christi/Nueces County, Texas. In this report, hospitalization rates for incident myocardial infarction are examined to determine whether Mexican Americans have greater incidence of myocardial infarction than non-Hispanic whites. In addition, we report attack rates for hospitalized myocardial infarction, including both incident and recurrent events.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Study Population
The target population of this surveillance program is all residents of Nueces County, Texas, 25 to 74 years old. The data for this report were collected during the period May 1, 1988, through April 30, 1992. Nueces County, located on the Texas Gulf Coast, had an estimated population of
291 145 in 1990, with 95% of the county
population residing within the central city of Corpus
Christi.34 Of the total population, 43% were non-Hispanic
whites, 52% were persons of Hispanic origin (of these, 92% were
Mexican-Americans), and 5% were African Americans or of other races.
In the target population 25 through 74 years old, 51% were
non-Hispanic whites and 45% were of Hispanic origin. The more detailed
data from the 1990 US Census35 showed marked
sociodemographic differences between the two major ethnic groups in
Nueces County. Mexican Americans had fewer years of formal education
(50% of Mexican-American adults were high school graduates versus 85%
of non-Hispanic whites). Furthermore, a greater percentage of Mexican
Americans, 29%, than non-Hispanic whites, 10%, reported incomes below
the poverty level. Medical care in Nueces County is self-contained, a situation that is essential to the accurate population-based ascertainment of cardiac events. At the beginning of this 48-month period, there were seven acute-care hospitals whose combined catchment areas included the entire resident population of the county. As a result of hospital closure and construction, by the end of this period, there were six acute-care hospitals in Corpus Christi. Surveillance occurred at all times in all hospitals in operation. Each of the hospitals maintained dedicated special-care units, although facilities for specialized cardiac procedures, such as angiography and aortocoronary bypass surgery, were available only at the three largest hospitals. San Antonio, the nearest urban center with medical care rivaling the quality available locally, is >150 miles from Nueces County; therefore, the likelihood of referral outside the county even for care on a nonemergency basis is low. This contention has been supported by a review of coronary heart disease–related discharges of Nueces County residents from the Veterans Administration hospital and other large private hospitals in San Antonio and Houston (data not shown).
Case Ascertainment and Data Collection
Potentially eligible patients were ascertained on a concurrent
basis during the period May 1, 1988, through April 30, 1992, by
monitoring of admissions to special-care units at the seven hospitals.
This process is similar to the "hot pursuit" procedure used in
the World Health Organization's Monitoring of Trends and Determinants
of Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) Project.36 Special-care
units were monitored on a regular basis to identify patients admitted
with diagnoses possibly indicative of coronary heart disease. To ensure
complete ascertainment of cases of hospitalized myocardial infarction,
lists of discharges with selected coronary heart disease–related
diagnoses were obtained from each hospital. Those hospitalizations that
had not already been identified through the concurrent procedures
described above were reviewed. This procedure allowed the
identification of patients with definite or possible myocardial
infarctions who were hospitalized outside of the special-care units. By
capture-mark-recapture techniques, completeness of ascertainment has
been estimated to be 97.9%; estimated completeness of ascertainment
did not differ by sex or ethnicity (unpublished data). For all
potential cases, hospital records were abstracted when first available
for review, usually at least 4 to 6 months after discharge. Data were
collected on the course and care of the patient during the hospital
stay, as well as on ethnicity, sociodemographic factors, medical
history, ECGs, drugs prescribed at discharge, and discharge diagnostic
codes.
Classification of Ethnicity and Events
During the first 24 months of ascertainment, the main method of
classification of ethnicity was by self-identification during an
in-hospital interview as to "Spanish origin" and for the
subcategory of "Mexican origin," as adopted in the 1980 US
Census, supplemented by medical record abstraction.37
Ethnicity of study subjects who were not interviewed was obtained from
the hospital records. Among 683 individuals interviewed during the
first 24 months of the project, the medical record and the interview
data concerning ethnicity were in agreement in 94.1% (643/683) of
cases (
=0.90, P<.001). During months 25 through 48,
classification of ethnicity was based solely on medical record
data.
Classification of cases as definite or possible myocardial infarction or no infarction was done in accordance with criteria recommended by Gillum and others,38 as modified in the Cardiovascular Community Surveillance Project.39 These criteria, based on ECGs, cardiac enzymes, and cardiac pain as routinely available in clinical records, permit classification of coronary events as definite or possible according to the degree of specificity of the criteria that were met ("Appendix"). In this report, the measure of interest is the combined occurrence of definite and possible myocardial infarction. This measure is a sensitive indicator of the burden of myocardial infarction in a population; as such, this is the preferred measure to examine for surveillance purposes. The theoretical disadvantage to using this measure is the inclusion of noncases. Since ethnicity is not part of the classification scheme, inclusion of noncases would bias the observed ethnicity-related rate ratios toward the null; therefore, this is a conservative approach. The definite myocardial infarction category, when considered alone, comprises a subset of cases of greater specificity but of substantially lower sensitivity for myocardial infarction. That is, many true cases are excluded. Thus, examination of the subclass of definite myocardial infarction has been proposed as more appropriate for testing questions of prognosis than for testing questions of differential incidence.38 The theoretical disadvantages of using the definite myocardial infarction subclass to examine questions of differential incidence include a loss of power due to reduced sample size and decreased generalizability related to the exclusion of true cases.38 Only those enzyme data and ECG tracings that were obtained within 72 hours of admission or after onset of an in-hospital acute event were used. ECGs were classified on site by study staff certified in the application of the Minnesota Code.38 ECGs were examined for a pattern of evolving myocardial infarction; for those cases, the ECG evidence was classified as "evolving diagnostic." When evidence of evolution was not seen, ECG evidence was ranked in the highest category met by any single recording, that is, "diagnostic," "equivocal," or "other." Enzyme data were treated similarly, being classified as "abnormal," "equivocal," "normal," or "incomplete." Abnormal enzymes were considered equivocal in the presence of nonischemic causes for elevated values, such as defibrillation, surgery, liver disease, or trauma. Pain that was described as having all of the following characteristics was classified as being of cardiac origin: (1) it occurred anywhere in the anterior chest, left arm, or jaw and might also involve the back, shoulder, right arm, or abdomen on one or both sides, and (2) it had a duration of >20 minutes or multiple doses of nitrates were self-administered without relief, and (3) it had no definite noncardiac cause. Similar criteria were previously tested extensively in the Community Cardiovascular Surveillance Program and elsewhere and are currently in use in the Minnesota Heart Health Program, the Stanford Five-City Project, and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program.39 40 41 42 A computer algorithm for application of the criteria has been used in the Minnesota Heart Study, the Community Cardiovascular Surveillance Program, and the current CCHP.
In these analyses, all hospitalizations that met criteria for definite or possible myocardial infarction were included as attacks. An incident, hospitalized myocardial infarction was defined as a hospitalization of a person without a history of previous myocardial infarction, as determined from a review of the medical record and from record linkage with data in our surveillance files. That is, we checked our surveillance files to determine whether or not a person met our criteria for hospitalized myocardial infarction previously during the study period. We had no access to surveillance data before May 1, 1988; thus, this criterion introduced the possibility that we might have overestimated incidence in our earlier data relative to that found when more recent data were used. We examined this potential bias from two perspectives. In study year 1 (May 1, 1988, through April 30, 1989), 68.5% (526/768) of myocardial infarction hospitalizations were classified as incident events; in study years 2, 3, and 4, respectively, 60.4% (430/712), 61.0% (426/698), and 61.0% (423/694) were identified as incident events. In study year 1, 8.3% (64/768) of myocardial infarction hospitalizations were identified as recurrent events solely on the basis of surveillance record linkage; that is, there was no indication of a previous history of myocardial infarction in the medical records of these individuals, yet there was a previous hospitalization for definite or possible myocardial infarction according to our surveillance data. In study years 2, 3, and 4, 12.2% (87/712), 13.8% (96/698), and 14.8% (103/694) of myocardial infarction hospitalizations were identified as recurrent events solely on the basis of surveillance record linkage. Both perspectives show attainment of a plateau essentially by study year 2; thus, these data support the conclusion that the estimates of incidence reported here may be more valid beginning in study year 2 than in study year 1. The attack rates were not affected by this limited, early misclassification.
Data Analysis
Midyear population estimates for each year 1988 through 1991 for
Nueces County were obtained in 10-year ethnicity- and sex-specific
groups from the Texas Department of Health to use as denominators in
the calculation of 1-year age-specific hospitalization rates for
attacks and incident myocardial infarction. The possibility that
age-by-ethnicity interactions might be present for either attack rates
or incidence was examined by linear regression of the natural logarithm
of the age-specific rates (attacks or incidence) on study year, age
group, ethnicity, and an age-by-ethnicity interaction term separately
for women and men. Age-adjusted rates of hospitalization for incident
myocardial infarction for the two ethnic groups, by sex, were
calculated by the direct method using the Texas population (25 to 74
years old) in 1990 as the referent. Trends in hospitalization rates
were examined by linear regression of the logarithm of the rate versus
time. Annual estimates of ethnicity- and sex-related rate ratios were
calculated by use of the age-adjusted rates described above. Linear
regression of the natural logarithm of the annual rate ratios versus
study year was performed to obtain overall estimates of ethnicity- and
sex-related rate ratios and corresponding 95% CIs at the midpoint of
the study period. These overall estimates were used to test the
hypotheses that Mexican Americans would have a greater incidence of
hospitalization for myocardial infarction than non-Hispanic whites for
both women and men and that women would have a lower incidence of
hospitalization for myocardial infarction than men for both Mexican
Americans and non-Hispanic whites.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
During 4 years of ascertainment (May 1, 1988, through April 30, 1992), we identified 2872 hospitalizations for myocardial infarction among Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white women and men; 1805 (62.8%) of these were classified as incident events. The "Appendix" includes a description of the criteria met by the 2872 hospitalizations. The age-specific rates and numbers of hospitalizations by ethnicity, sex, age, and study year are shown for incident myocardial infarctions in the Table
. With rare
exceptions for both sexes, the age-specific rates for incident events
were higher among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites.
There was no evidence of an age-by-ethnicity interaction for incident
events (results not shown); therefore, meaningful age-adjusted rates
could be calculated for ethnic comparisons. Similar results were seen
for attacks (not shown). Ethnicity- and sex-specific, age-adjusted
rates for attacks and incidence are shown in Figs 1 and 2, respectively. The highest attack rates were observed
among Mexican-American men, followed in order by non-Hispanic white
men, then Mexican-American women, and finally, non-Hispanic white
women. Attack rates declined over the 4-year period in both groups of
women and in Mexican-American men; a slight increase was observed among
non-Hispanic white men (Fig 1). The declining trend in attack rates was
statistically significant only in Mexican-American women
(P<.05 for log[attack rate] regressed on study year). The
highest incidence rates were also observed among Mexican-American men,
followed in order by non-Hispanic white men, then Mexican-American
women, and finally, non-Hispanic white women. Also, as for attack
rates, the incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction declined in
both groups of women and in Mexican-American men; incidence did not
change appreciably in non-Hispanic white men (Fig 2). Again, only in
Mexican-American women did this declining trend reach statistical
significance (P<.05 for log[incidence rate] regressed on
study year). The steepest declines in incidence were seen between years
1 and 2, especially in women. Since we had concerns about the accuracy
of classification of incident cases in year 1, our examination of
trends was based on years 2 through 4. Between year 2 and year 4,
incidence decreased among Mexican Americans, but no appreciable change
was observed among non-Hispanic whites. None of the 3-year trends in
incidence were statistically significant. With only 4 years of data
regarding trends, we had limited power to compare trends among
ethnicity- or sex-specific groups. At present, the declines in both
attacks and incidence appear to be more rapid in Mexican Americans than
in non-Hispanic whites, for both women and men, and more rapid in women
than in men of both ethnic groups.
|
|
|
As the primary analysis for this report, we examined and compared rates
of myocardial infarction attacks and incidence between Mexican
Americans and non-Hispanic whites and between women and men on the
basis of 4 years of data. Annual estimates of rate ratios for ethnic
and sex comparisons of myocardial infarction attacks and incidence are
shown in Figs 3 and 4, respectively. In
every study year and for both women and men, Mexican Americans
experienced greater hospitalization rates for both myocardial
infarction attacks and incidence than non-Hispanic whites. Age-adjusted
attack rate ratios at the midpoint of the 4-year study period comparing
Mexican Americans with non-Hispanic whites were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.05 to
2.41) and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.45) among women and men,
respectively. Corresponding incidence ratios were 1.52 (95% CI,
1.28 to 1.80) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.42). In every study year and
for both Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites, women experienced
lower hospitalization rates for both myocardial infarction attacks and
incidence than men. Age-adjusted attack rate ratios of myocardial
infarction comparing women and men were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.68)
and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.66) among Mexican Americans and
non-Hispanic whites, respectively. Corresponding incidence ratios were
0.61 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.74) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.63).
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
This is the first report documenting greater incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites. This finding was observed for both women and men and confirms our previously published results based on data regarding total hospitalizations for myocardial infarction, including both incident and recurrent events, in the first year of the study.20 This ethnic difference in incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction may be due to the adverse pattern of cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites. Although we have no risk factor data specific to the Corpus Christi population, others have reported on differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Mexican Americans reportedly have higher blood concentrations of cholesterol2 8 and triglycerides2 12 and lower concentrations of HDL cholesterol2 4 than non-Hispanic whites. Mexican Americans have smaller (potentially more atherogenic) LDL particles.13 Conversely, Mexican Americans have lower lipoprotein(a) levels.14 Mexican Americans also have diminished insulin sensitivity and insulin response3 and greater prevalence and incidence of diabetes4 7 9 15 and diabetic complications, including retinopathy and nephropathy.43 44 45 Mexican Americans also have greater prevalence of obesity2 4 10 and similar or only slightly lower prevalence and incidence of hypertension.4 11 16 17 18 The prevalence of cigarette smoking is similar in the two groups of men but substantially lower among Mexican-American women than among non-Hispanic white women; in both sexes, the number of cigarettes smoked per day is substantially lower among Mexican Americans.4 Mexican Americans are also less likely to receive treatment for diabetes,7 hypercholesterolemia,8 and hypertension.6 18 In summary, the available data support the impression that the cardiovascular disease risk factor pattern among Mexican Americans is adverse relative to that of non-Hispanic whites, and there is no obvious reason to doubt the generalizability of these data to the Corpus Christi population. On this basis, our findings of greater incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans were expected.
Conversely, our findings of greater incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites conflict with analyses of death certificate data that suggest lower coronary heart disease mortality rates in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites, at least among men.21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 We have analyzed Nueces County mortality data (unpublished data) and found the same ethnic pattern as we reported for Texas29 ; thus, the inconsistency is not due to local factors operating in Nueces County. These results also contradict two reports based on prevalence of myocardial infarction. In a report from the San Antonio Heart Study, Mexican-American women had nonsignificantly higher prevalence and Mexican-American men had significantly lower prevalence of myocardial infarction than their non-Hispanic white counterparts.30 In a report from the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study, ethnic comparisons of the prevalence of myocardial infarction appeared to differ by sex and diabetic status; however, none of the ethnic comparisons reached statistical significance. Among participants who did not have diabetes, Hispanic women had lower prevalence of myocardial infarction than non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanic men a similar prevalence. Among diabetic participants, Hispanic women had similar prevalence and Hispanic men lower prevalence than non-Hispanic whites.31
The inconsistency in ethnic comparisons of myocardial infarction rates based on hospitalizations versus deaths could be explained by any of three leading considerations. Each is addressed here, in turn: (1) inadequacies in the completion of death certificates, (2) incomplete ascertainment of myocardial infarction in our surveillance data collection, and (3) real and large ethnic differences in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death rates or silent myocardial infarction rates. Differential enumeration of the population of Nueces County by ethnicity cannot explain this inconsistency because hospitalization rates and mortality rates were calculated from the same population estimates.
1. Inadequacies in the certification of cause of death seem the likeliest explanation. Death certificates are completed by health professionals who may not be fully aware of the research uses of these data. Furthermore, ethnic differences in access to medical care and misclassification of ethnicity on death certificates may lead to spurious ethnic differences in the certified cause of death. The combined effect of these potential biases is difficult to predict and requires additional attention. On the basis of our findings of greater myocardial infarction hospitalization rates and posthospitalization case-fatality rates,33 we would expect greater community-level coronary heart disease mortality rates in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites. This implies the existence of a substantial degree of misclassification of cause of death and/or ethnicity on death certificates. Such misclassification could include overdiagnosis of myocardial infarction deaths among non-Hispanic whites, underdiagnosis among Mexican Americans, and/or misclassification of Mexican-American decedents as being non-Hispanic white. We are currently collecting death certificates and supporting data for out-of-hospital coronary heart disease–related deaths in Nueces County with which to examine these and other issues.
2. As noted above, we have estimated that our completeness of
ascertainment of hospitalized myocardial infarction is 98% with the
capture-mark-recapture methodology. This estimated completeness of
ascertainment did not differ by sex or ethnicity; therefore, our data
on hospitalized myocardial infarction do not appear to be biased by
differential ascertainment by ethnicity or sex. We have also examined
the issue of potential ethnicity-related differences in the validation
of myocardial infarction. In a comparison of validated cases with
clinically diagnosed cases, ie, those given a discharge diagnostic code
of 410, we observed no ethnicity-related difference in sensitivity,
specificity, or predictive values in either women or men (unpublished
data).
3. The results presented here do not include data regarding
out-of-hospital cardiac deaths. It is possible that both the death
certificate–based mortality estimates and these hospitalization
estimates are correct. If so, then an opposing and substantial ethnic
difference must exist in out-of-hospital myocardial infarction deaths.
The magnitude of the excess incidence of hospitalized myocardial
infarction among Mexican Americans was substantial, 25% for men and
50% for women in this study. Out-of-hospital cardiac deaths are
generally believed to account for 25% of myocardial infarctions. If
this latter statement is assumed to be true and the total myocardial
infarction rates (the sum of hospitalized myocardial infarctions and
out-of-hospital myocardial infarction deaths) are assumed to be equal
between the ethnic groups, the out-of-hospital myocardial infarction
mortality rate ratios comparing Mexican Americans with non-Hispanic
whites must be 0.5 and 0.25 among men and women, respectively. It seems
unlikely that ethnic differences in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac
death rates could be large enough to account for the inconsistency
between ethnic comparisons of myocardial infarction rates on the basis
of hospitalizations versus deaths. This contention is further supported
by reports indicating that the risk factors for sudden cardiac death
are similar to those for myocardial infarction46 ;
therefore, one would expect similar ethnic patterns for hospitalized
myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death. One
would expect greater, not lesser, out-of-hospital myocardial infarction
mortality among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites. We
believe that the mortality rate ratios are likely to be similar to
those reported here for hospitalizations. Nevertheless, additional
attention to the issue of out-of-hospital death is warranted. Data
regarding silent myocardial infarction can be obtained best from cohort
studies; however, for the same reasons as given above, ethnic
differences in the occurrence of silent myocardial infarction that
oppose and are large enough to offset the pattern observed for
hospitalized myocardial infarction seem unlikely.
The inconsistency between these incidence data and other prevalence data, such as those reported from the San Antonio Heart Study,30 can be explained by differential survival after myocardial infarction. Prevalence is related to both incidence and survival. Therefore, a group with greater incidence of myocardial infarction and greater case-fatality, such as Mexican Americans, can have lower prevalence of myocardial infarction than a group with both lower incidence and better post–myocardial infarction survival, such as non-Hispanic whites. We have reported greater short- and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites.32 33 As expected, the greater mortality observed among Mexican Americans after myocardial infarction was related, in part, to the greater prevalence of diabetes among Mexican Americans hospitalized for myocardial infarction.33 47 This ethnic difference in survival after myocardial infarction might explain the inconsistency in ethnic comparisons on the basis of prevalence and incidence data. Additional data regarding ethnic differences in the incidence of myocardial infarction from other studies of these ethnic groups could help resolve the inconsistencies identified in this report.
As expected, rate ratios comparing myocardial infarction incidence and attack rates between women and men were consistent with results from many other studies in showing substantially lower rates among women than among men in both ethnic groups. These expected results add further strength to the validity of our inferences related to ethnic differences.
Our present analysis of trends in myocardial infarction incidence and attack rates has limited power because of its short duration to date (4 years). Even so, the trends seem to be declining more rapidly among Mexican Americans than among non-Hispanic whites and more rapidly among women than among men. These findings are related primarily to flat trends for both incidence and attack rates among non-Hispanic white men. Whether these flat trends are harbingers of an end to the decline in coronary heart disease mortality rates in non-Hispanic white men and eventually other sex and ethnic groups remains to be seen.
As indicated above, this study is limited by lack of data regarding out-of-hospital cardiac deaths and silent myocardial infarctions; plausible frequencies of these occurrences do not explain our results. In addition, this study has several important strengths. First, this study is population-based, at least in terms of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction. All of the acute-care hospitals in Nueces County were participating in this surveillance program. According to estimates of completeness of ascertainment, almost every person residing in Nueces County who was hospitalized with a myocardial infarction in Nueces County during the study period was included in this analysis. Furthermore, Nueces County is relatively isolated from other centers of medical care. Few patients leave Nueces County for acute medical care; thus, the effects of selection bias regarding sources of care outside the community should be minimal. Second, the Mexican-American population in Nueces County is large enough to provide stable estimates of incidence; thus, chance is an unlikely explanation of our results. This contention is supported by the relatively narrow 95% CIs associated with the reported rate ratios. Finally, the Hispanic population studied, Mexican Americans, is the largest subgroup of Hispanics in the United States; thus, these results have substantial public health importance.
These findings confirm our previously published results based on 1 year of case ascertainment of total myocardial infarction20 and support the contention that Mexican Americans have a greater incidence of myocardial infarction than non-Hispanic whites among both women and men. Furthermore, this finding is biologically plausible, given the risk factor patterns observed in the Mexican-American population. Because of both immigration and natality, the Mexican-American population in the United States is younger and growing more rapidly than the non-Hispanic white population. Over the next several decades, one can predict that an increasing number of Mexican Americans will be entering the age range in which coronary heart disease in general and myocardial infarction in particular are the leading health problems. Public health planners and clinicians should be aware of the importance of myocardial infarction as a health problem in the Mexican-American population. Culturally appropriate prevention strategies should be developed for and tested in Mexican-American populations.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This investigation was supported by grant HL-38429 awarded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The authors thank the Corpus Christi Advisory Committee, the administrators and staffs of the participating hospitals, and the Corpus Christi–Nueces County Department of Public Health for their support of this project.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Guest editor for this article was Charles H. Hennekens, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
|
Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
|
A more detailed description of criteria for myocardial infarction is available from the authors on request.
Received May 29, 1996; revision received October 30, 1996; accepted November 12, 1996.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
1. Council on Scientific Affairs. Hispanic health in the United States. JAMA. 1991;265:248-252.
2.
Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, Rosenthal M, Knapp
JA. The role of behavioral variables and fat patterning in
explaining ethnic differences in serum lipids and lipoproteins.
Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:830-839.
3. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Dunn J, Mobley M, Blackwell J, Bergman RN. Diminished insulin sensitivity and increased insulin response in nonobese, nondiabetic Mexican-Americans. Metabolism. 1990;39:842-847. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Mitchell BD, Stern MP, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP,
Patterson JK. Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in
Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the San Antonio Heart
Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131:423-433.
5.
Burchfiel CM, Hamman RF, Marshall JA, Baxter J, Kahn
LB, Amirani JJ. Cardiovascular risk factors and impaired glucose
tolerance: the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Am J
Epidemiol. 1990;131:57-70.
6.
Franco LJ, Stern MP, Rosenthal M, Haffner SM, Hazuda
HP, Comeaux PJ. Prevalence, detection, and control of
hypertension in a biethnic community: the San Antonio Heart
Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:684-696.
7.
Hamman RF, Marshall JA, Baxter J, Kahn LB, Mayer EJ,
Orleans M, Murphy JR, Lezotte DC. Methods and prevalence of
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a biethnic Colorado
population: the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Am J
Epidemiol. 1989;129:295-311.
8. Pugh JA, Stern MP, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Patterson J. Detection and treatment of hypercholesterolemia in a biethnic community, 1979-1985. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:331-336. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Perez-Stable EJ, McMillen MM, Harris MI, Jaurez RZ,
Knowler WC, Stern MP, Haynes SG. Self-reported diabetes in
Mexican Americans: HHANES 1982-1984. Am J Public
Health. 1989;79:770-772.
10. Stern MP, Patterson JK, Mitchell BD, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP. Overweight and mortality in Mexican Americans. Int J Obes. 1990;14:623-629. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Stern MP, Gaskill SP, Allen CR, Garza V, Gonzales JL,
Waldrop RH. Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans in
Laredo, Texas, II: prevalence and control of hypertension.
Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113:556-562.
12. Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins of Hispanics, 1982-84. Washington, DC: Vital and Health Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics; 1990: Series 11; No. 240.
13.
Haffner SM, Mykkanen L, Valdez RA, Paidi M, Stern MP,
Howard BV. LDL size and subclass pattern in a biethnic
population. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1623-1630.
14.
Haffner SM, Gruber KK, Morales PA, Hazuda HP, Valdez
RA, Mitchell BD, Stern MP. Lipoprotein (a) concentrations in
Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the San Antonio Heart
Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:1060-1068.
15.
Marshall JA, Hamman RF, Baxter J, Mayer EJ, Fulton DL,
Orleans M, Rewers M, Jones RH. Ethnic differences in risk
factors associated with the prevalence of non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus: the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:706-718.
16. Francis C. Hypertension and cardiac disease in minorities. Am J Med. 1990;88(suppl 3B):3S-8S.
17. Shetterly SM, Rewers M, Hamman RF, Marshall JA. Patterns and predictors of hypertension incidence among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites: the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. J Hypertens. 1994;12:1095-1102. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Brown C, Cutler JA,
Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in
the US adult population: results from the Third National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.
Hypertension. 1995;25:305-313.
19.
Gaskill SP, Allen CR, Garza V, Gonzales JL, Waldrop
RH. Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican-Americans in Laredo,
Texas. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113:546-555.
20. Nichaman MZ, Wear ML, Goff DC, Labarthe DR. Hospitalization rates for myocardial infarction among Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the Corpus Christi Heart Project. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:42-48. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Becker TM, Wiggins C, Key CR, Samet JM. Ischemic
heart disease mortality in Hispanics, American Indians and non-Hispanic
whites in New Mexico, 1958-1982. Circulation. 1988;78:302-309.
22.
Frerichs R, Chapman J, Maes E. Mortality due to
all causes and to cardiovascular diseases among seven race-ethnic
populations in Los Angeles County, 1980. Int J
Epidemiol. 1984;13:291-298.
23. Friis R, Nanjundappa G, Prendergast TJ, Welsh M. Coronary heart disease mortality and risk among Hispanics in Orange County, California. Public Health Rep. 1981;96:418-422. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Kautz JA, Bradshaw BS, Fonner E Jr. Trends in
cardiovascular mortality in Spanish-surnamed, other white and black
persons in Texas, 1970-1975. Circulation. 1981;64:730-735.
25.
Rosenwaike I. Mortality differentials among
persons born in Cuba, Mexico and Puerto Rico residing in the United
States, 1979-81. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:603-606.
26. Shai D, Rosenwaike I. Mortality among Hispanics in metropolitan Chicago: an examination based on vital statistics data. J Chronic Dis. 1987;4:445-451.
27.
Stern MP, Bradshaw B, Eifler CW, Fong DS, Hazuda HP,
Rosenthal M. Secular decline in death rates due to
ischemic heart disease in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic
whites, Texas, 1970-1980. Circulation. 1987;76:1245-1250.
28.
Stern M, Gaskill S. Secular trends in
ischemic heart disease and stroke mortality from 1970-1976 in
Spanish-surnamed and other white individuals in Bexar County,
Texas. Circulation. 1978;58:537-543.
29. Goff DC, Ramsey DJ, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ. Acute myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease mortality among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites in Texas, 1980 through 1989. Ethn Dis. 1993;3:64-69. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Mitchell BD, Hazuda HP, Haffner SM, Patterson JK, Stern
MP. Myocardial infarction in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic
whites: the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation. 1991;83:45-51.
31. Rewers M, Shetterly SM, Hoag S, Baxter J, Marshall J, Hamman RF. Is the risk of coronary heart disease lower in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites? The San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Ethn Dis. 1993;3:44-54. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Goff DC, Varas C, Ramsey DJ, Wear ML, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ. Mortality after hospitalization for myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the Corpus Christi Heart Project. Ethn Dis. 1993;3:55-63. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Goff DC, Ramsey DJ, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ.
Greater case-fatality after myocardial infarction among Mexican
Americans and women than among non-Hispanic whites and men: the Corpus
Christi Heart Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:474-483.
34. US Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census of the Population: General Population Characteristics: Texas. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; 1992. Publication CP-1-45.
35. US Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Summary Social, Economic, and Housing Characteristics: Texas. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; 1992. Publication CPH-5-45.
36. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Problems with criteria and quality control in the registration of coronary events in the MONICA study. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1988;728:17-25. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. US Bureau of the Census. 1980 Census of the Population Supplementary Reports. Age, Sex, Race, and Spanish Origin of the Population by Regions, Divisions, and States: 1980. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce; May 1981. Publication PC80-S1-1.
38. Gillum RF, Fortmann SP, Prineas RJ, Kottke TE. International diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction and acute stroke. Am Heart J. 1984;108:150-158. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. CCSP Coordinating Center Program. Final Report to the NHLBI. Division of Clinical Investigation, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Community Cardiovascular Surveillance Program, June 1, 1984.
40.
Mascioli S, Jacobs D, Kottke T. Diagnostic
criteria for hospitalized acute myocardial infarction: the Minnesota
experience. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18:76-83.
41.
Fortmann SP, Haskell WL, Williams PT, Varady AN, Hulley
SB, Farquhar JW. Community surveillance of cardiovascular
disease in the Stanford Five City Project: methods and initial
experience. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:656-669.
42. Lasater T, Abrams D, Artz L, Beaudin P, Cabrera L, Elder J, Ferreira A, Knisley P, Peterson G, Rodrigues A, Rosenberg P, Snow R, Carleton R. Lay volunteer delivery of a community-based cardiovascular risk factor change program: the Pawtucket experiment. In: Matarazzo JD, Weiss SM, Herd JA, Miller NE, Weiss SM, eds. Behavioral Health: A Handbook for Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1984:1166-1170.
43. Haffner SM, Fong D, Stern MP, Pugh JA, Hazuda HP, Patterson JK, van Heuven WA, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Diabetes. 1988;37:878-884. [Abstract]
44. Haffner SM, Mitchell BD, Pugh JA, Stern MP, Hazuda HP. Proteinuria in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:530-536. [Abstract]
45.
Pugh JA, Stern MP, Haffner SM, Eifler CW, Zapata
M. Excess incidence of treatment of end-stage renal disease in
Mexican-Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;127:135-144.
46. Cupples LA, Gagnon DR, Kannel WB. Long- and short-term risk of sudden coronary death. Circulation. 1992;85(suppl I):I-11-I-18.
47. Orlander PR, Goff DC, Morrissey M, Ramsey DJ, Wear ML, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ. The relation of diabetes to the severity of acute myocardial infarction and post-myocardial infarction survival in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the Corpus Christi Heart Project. Diabetes. 1994;43:897-902.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Mehrotra, D. Kermah, L. Fried, S. Adler, and K. Norris Racial Differences in Mortality Among Those with CKD J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1403 - 1410. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. A. Pearson, M. A. Denke, P. E. McBride, W. P. Battisti, R. A. Gazzara, W. E. Brady, and J. Palmisano Effectiveness of Ezetimibe Added to Ongoing Statin Therapy in Modifying Lipid Profiles and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment in Patients of Different Races and Ethnicities: A Substudy of the Ezetimibe Add-On to Statin for Effectiveness Trial Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2006; 81(9): 1177 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. T. Nguyen and A. G. Stack Ethnic Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Coronary Disease Prevalence among Individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1716 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. D. Reaven and J. Sacks Reduced Coronary Artery and Abdominal Aortic Calcification in Hispanics With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(5): 1115 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Hunt, R. G. Resendez, K. Williams, S. M. Haffner, M. P. Stern, and H. P. Hazuda All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality among Mexican-American and Non-Hispanic White Older Participants in the San Antonio Heart Study-- Evidence against the "Hispanic Paradox" Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2003; 158(11): 1048 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Graves and P. M. Miller Behavioral Medicine in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease Behav Modif, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 3 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Swenson, M. J. Trepka, M. J. Rewers, S. Scarbro, W. R. Hiatt, and R. F. Hamman Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2002; 156(10): 919 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Bild, D. A. Bluemke, G. L. Burke, R. Detrano, A. V. Diez Roux, A. R. Folsom, P. Greenland, D. R. JacobsJr., R. Kronmal, K. Liu, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2002; 156(9): 871 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Hunt, K. Williams, R. G. Resendez, H. P. Hazuda, S. M. Haffner, and M. P. Stern All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Diabetic Participants in the San Antonio Heart Study: Evidence against the "Hispanic Paradox" Diabetes Care, September 1, 2002; 25(9): 1557 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. L. Roger, S. J. Jacobsen, S. A. Weston, T. Y. Goraya, J. Killian, G. S. Reeder, T. E. Kottke, B. P. Yawn, and R. L. Frye Trends in the Incidence and Survival of Patients with Hospitalized Myocardial Infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994 Ann Intern Med, March 5, 2002; 136(5): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Yusuf, S. Reddy, S. Ounpuu, and S. Anand Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases: Part II: Variations in Cardiovascular Disease by Specific Ethnic Groups and Geographic Regions and Prevention Strategies Circulation, December 4, 2001; 104(23): 2855 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. B. Morgenstern, T. H. Wein, M. A. Smith, L. A. Moye, D. K. Pandey, and D. R. Labarthe Comparison of stroke hospitalization rates among Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 2000 - 2002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Goff Jr, D. K. Pandey, F. A. Chan, C. Ortiz, and M. Z. Nichaman Congestive Heart Failure in the United States: Is There More Than Meets the I(CD Code)? The Corpus Christi Heart Project Arch Intern Med, January 24, 2000; 160(2): 197 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G. Cohen, C. B. Granger, E. M. Ohman, A. L. Stebbins, L. R. Grinfeld, A. M. Cagide, M. V. Elizari, A. Betriu, D. F. Kong, E. J. Topol, et al. Outcome of hispanic patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Results from the GUSTO-I and -III trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1999; 34(6): 1729 - 1737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Grundy, R. Pasternak, P. Greenland, S. Smith Jr, and V. Fuster Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1348 - 1359. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Grundy, R. Pasternak, P. Greenland, S. Smith Jr, and V. Fuster Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk by Use of Multiple-Risk-Factor Assessment Equations : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Circulation, September 28, 1999; 100(13): 1481 - 1492. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Haffner, R. D'Agostino Jr, D. Goff, B. Howard, A. Festa, M. F. Saad, and L. Mykkanen LDL Size in African Americans, Hispanics, and Non-Hispanic Whites : The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, September 1, 1999; 19(9): 2234 - 2240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Goldberg, J. Yarzebski, D. Lessard, and J. M. Gore A two-decades (1975 to 1995) long experience in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case-fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. D. Rosamond, L. E. Chambless, A. R. Folsom, L. S. Cooper, D. E. Conwill, L. Clegg, C.-H. Wang, and G. Heiss Trends in the Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and in Mortality Due to Coronary Heart Disease, 1987 to 1994 N. Engl. J. Med., September 24, 1998; 339(13): 861 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Winkleby, H. C. Kraemer, D. K. Ahn, and A. N. Varady Ethnic and Socioeconomic Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Findings for Women From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 JAMA, July 22, 1998; 280(4): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Mosca, J. E. Manson, S. E. Sutherland, R. D. Langer, T. Manolio, E. Barrett-Connor, and E. Barrett-Connor Cardiovascular Disease in Women : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Circulation, October 7, 1997; 96(7): 2468 - 2482. [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||