(Circulation. 1997;95:1568-1576.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal and Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal (Québec), Canada.
Correspondence to Michel Lavallée, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000, Bélanger St E, Montréal, Québec, Canada H1T 1C8.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results In conscious instrumented dogs after
ß1-adrenergic blockade, intracoronary (IC) injections of
acetylcholine (ACh), nitroglycerin (NTG), and pirbuterol (PIR), a
selective ß2-adrenergic agonist, were performed before
and after blockade of NO formation with IC
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME, 50
µg·kg-1·min-1x12
minutes) or blockade of KATP channels with IC glibenclamide
(25
µg·kg-1·min-1x12
minutes followed by 2
µg·kg-1·min-1).
PIR (50.0 ng/kg) increased coronary blood flow (CBF) by 32±6 from
43±7 mL/min and by only 11±2 (P<.01) from 40±7 mL/min
after L-NAME. Increases in CBF to ACh were also reduced by L-NAME, but
NTG responses were not. Before glibenclamide, PIR increased CBF by
33±5 from 45±7 mL/min and by only 14±3 (P<.01) from
36±5 mL/min thereafter. CBF responses to ACh and NTG were maintained
after glibenclamide. Lemakalim, a selective opener of KATP
channels, caused dose-dependent increases in CBF that were partially
inhibited by L-NAME. In experiments in which CBF was controlled, the
fall in distal coronary pressure caused by PIR was less after L-NAME or
glibenclamide than before.
Conclusions ß2-Adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels involves both the opening of KATP channels and NO formation. L-NAME antagonized lemakalim responses consistent with a link between the opening of KATP channels and NO formation in canine resistance coronary vessels.
Key Words: endothelium endothelium-derived factors microcirculation receptors, adrenergic, beta
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fact that cAMP-dependent vasodilation involves KATP channels led us to consider that opening of these channels may intervene in the pathway triggering NO formation during ß2-adrenergic stimulation of resistance coronary vessels.15 Therefore, the effects of selective blockade of NO formation or KATP channels on CBF responses to ß2-adrenergic stimulation were studied in conscious dogs. The consequences of blockade of NO formation for coronary responses elicited by opening of KATP channels with lemakalim were also investigated.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemodynamic variables were recorded on a VHS tape with a PCM recording adaptor (model 4000A, A.R. Vetter Co) and monitored on a direct ink-writing strip-chart recorder (model 2800s, Gould).
Protocols
ß2-Adrenergic Dilation and Blockade of NO
Formation
Experiments were performed 2 to 6 weeks after surgery in
conscious healthy dogs lying quietly on their right sides in a dimly
illuminated laboratory. While HR, LVP, LV dP/dt, phasic arterial
pressure and MAP, and phasic and mean CBF were continuously monitored
in animals pretreated with 1.0 mg/kg atenolol IV (Sigma Chemical Co) to
eliminate ß1-adrenergic influences, IC bolus injections
of pirbuterol hydrochloride (Pfizer Inc), a selective
ß2-adrenergic agonist18 ; of acetylcholine
(Sigma); and of nitroglycerin (Parke-Davis) were administered. Drugs
injected IC were freshly dissolved in 0.2 mL warm saline (38.9°C),
slowly injected, and then flushed with an additional 1.0 mL saline
delivered with a pump-driven syringe over a 15-second period. The
sequence of drug administration was randomly selected. At least 3 to 5
minutes was allowed between injections for the return to a steady-state
hemodynamic baseline. The same procedure was repeated 10 minutes after
the completion of IC administration of 50
µg·kg-1·min-1
for 12 minutes of L-NAME (Sigma) delivered in 0.5 mL/min saline.
ß2-Adrenergic Dilation and Blockade of
KATP Channels
At least 48 hours later, and after atenolol (1.0 mg/kg IV), the
effects of IC injections of pirbuterol, acetylcholine, and
nitroglycerin were studied before and after blockade of
KATP channels with glibenclamide (Sigma) delivered as an IC
infusion of 25
µg·kg-1·min-1x12
minutes followed by 2
µg·kg-1·min-1
for the duration of the experiment. The adequacy of KATP
channel blockade with glibenclamide was confirmed by blunted CBF
responses to IC adenosine (Sigma) and to lemakalim (SmithKline Beecham
Pharma), a selective KATP channel opener.19 20
Lemakalim was prepared from a stock solution containing 1% DMSO in
saline, and the final concentration of DMSO in the injectate was
0.03%. The vehicle alone had no significant effect on CBF.
Glibenclamide was freshly dissolved in saline containing 2.0 mmol/L
sodium hydroxide and was injected at a rate of 1.0 mL/min IC during 12
minutes. Administration of the vehicle containing sodium hydroxide used
to dissolve glibenclamide did not interfere with pirbuterol-induced CBF
responses. Blood glucose levels were maintained within the normal range
during glibenclamide infusion by intravenous 10% dextrose
infusion.
Opening of KATP Channels and Blockade of NO
Formation
On a separate day, the effects of IC lemakalim, acetylcholine,
and nitroglycerin were studied before and after IC L-NAME.
Controlled CBF and Blockade of NO Formation or KATP
Channels
Coronary responses were also studied while CBF increases were
prevented, and DCP was used as an index of coronary vasomotion. In six
additional dogs, a Doppler flow probe was placed close to the origin of
the left circumflex coronary artery, and a hydraulic constrictor placed
next to this probe was used for preventing drug-induced increases in
CBF. An IC catheter was implanted distal to the hydraulic constrictor
to inject the drugs and to measure DCP with an external transducer
(model 800, Bentley Trantec). The tip of this catheter was located
before the first marginal coronary artery. After atenolol (1.0 mg/kg
IV), baseline hemodynamics and DCP were recorded, and bolus doses of
drugs (0.2 mL) were injected into the IC catheter and flushed with 1.0
mL saline over a period of 8 seconds. DCP recordings were obtained
immediately thereafter. When CBF was controlled, the hydraulic
constrictor was inflated at the time CBF started to increase, and care
was taken to limit CBF increases to <10% above baseline levels and to
avoid even slight decreases below baseline levels. Lemakalim and
pirbuterol were injected during normal and controlled CBF conditions
before and after IC L-NAME. On a separate day, the effects of
pirbuterol before and after glibenclamide were studied with and without
controlled CBF. Dextrose was administered as previously described.
Data Analysis
Hemodynamic data were read directly from the strip charts during
baseline conditions and at peak increases of CBF after boluses
injections of the various drugs. With a computer-assisted digitizing
tablet, the area under mean CBF recordings in excess of baseline CBF,
called volume response, was planimetered from the rise in CBF to the
return of CBF to baseline and reported in milliliters. This approach
was used to analyze responses to acetylcholine, pirbuterol,
nitroglycerin, and adenosine. Because of the long-lasting effects of
lemakalim on CBF, volume responses were measured from the rise in CBF
to the point of 50% decline from peak CBF. The duration of CBF
responses was established by direct measurement on the strip charts of
the time corresponding to the measured volume responses. In experiments
in which CBF was controlled, mean DCP was reported before and at peak
decreases after drug injection. Data are reported as mean±SEM
throughout. Overall simultaneous comparisons of baseline levels (before
the various drugs) before and after L-NAME or before and after
glibenclamide were made with two-way ANOVA for repeated
measurements.21 22 A similar approach was used for
comparing responses to a specific drug before and after L-NAME or
glibenclamide. For protocols involving the injection of a single dose
of acetylcholine, nitroglycerin, or lemakalim, paired t
tests were used for comparing responses before and after L-NAME or
glibenclamide. Comparisons of LVP, LV dP/dt, MAP, and HR at peak CBF
with baselines were made with paired t tests.
Statistical significance was reached when P<.05 in all cases. All experimental procedures were approved by an ethical committee on animal care and performed in accordance with the Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (Canadian Council on Animal Care publication No. [ISBN] 0-919087-18-3, Ottawa, 1993).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Pirbuterol. A recording of responses elicited by pirbuterol
(100.0 ng/kg) before and after L-NAME is displayed in Fig 1
. L-NAME resulted in a smaller CBF response to
pirbuterol. Before L-NAME, pirbuterol 50.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 32±6
from 43±7 mL/min. Pirbuterol resulted in smaller (P<.01)
CBF responses (11±2 from 40±7 mL/min) after L-NAME. Overall, peak
increases in CBF and the volume and duration of CBF responses to
pirbuterol were smaller (P<.01) after L-NAME, as reported
in Fig 2
.
|
|
Acetylcholine. Acetylcholine 3.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 49±6 from 42±7 mL/min before L-NAME. After blockade of NO formation, acetylcholine-induced increases in CBF were limited (P<.01) to 28±4 from 44±8 mL/min. Overall, peak increases in CBF and the volume and duration of CBF responses to acetylcholine were smaller (P<.01) after L-NAME.
Nitroglycerin. Nitroglycerin 50.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 18±2 from 42±7 mL/min before L-NAME. Similar responses (22±4 from 46±8 mL/min) were elicited by nitroglycerin after L-NAME. The volume and the duration of CBF responses to nitroglycerin did not differ statistically before and after L-NAME.
ß2-Adrenergic Dilation and Blockade of
KATP Channels
Overall, simultaneous comparisons made between baseline values
(values before all drugs) revealed slight increases in MAP, decreases
in LV dP/dt, and no changes in LVP and HR after glibenclamide. Baseline
CBF fell (P<.05) after glibenclamide, as reported in Table 2
. Except for increases in CBF, other hemodynamic
effects of pirbuterol, acetylcholine, adenosine, lemakalim, and
nitroglycerin were trivial and did not differ statistically before and
after glibenclamide. Lemakalim 100.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 45±3
mL/min before glibenclamide and by only 6±1 mL/min (P<.01)
thereafter. Thus, adequate blockade of KATP channels was
achieved.
|
Pirbuterol. A recording of responses elicited by pirbuterol
100.0 ng/kg before and after glibenclamide is displayed in Fig 3
. Glibenclamide resulted in a smaller CBF response to
pirbuterol.
|
Before glibenclamide, pirbuterol 50.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 33±5 from
45±7 mL/min. After blockade of KATP channels, pirbuterol
resulted in smaller (P<.01) increases in CBF (14±3 from
36±5 mL/min). Overall, peak increases in CBF and the volume and
duration of CBF responses to pirbuterol were smaller
(P<.01) after glibenclamide, as reported in Fig 4
.
|
Acetylcholine. Acetylcholine 3.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 49±3
from 45±7 mL/min before glibenclamide. After blockade of
KATP channels, acetylcholine-induced increases in CBF
did not differ (46±6 from 37±6 mL/min). Overall, peak increases in
CBF and the volume and duration of CBF responses to acetylcholine did
not differ statistically before and after glibenclamide, as reported in
Fig 5
.
|
Nitroglycerin. Nitroglycerin 50.0 ng/kg increased CBF by 15±1 from 42±7 mL/min before glibenclamide. Similar responses (15±2 from 39±6 mL/min) were elicited by nitroglycerin after glibenclamide. The volume and duration of CBF responses to nitroglycerin did not differ before and after glibenclamide.
Opening of KATP Channels and Blockade of NO
Formation
The effects of lemakalim 50.0 ng/kg before and after L-NAME are
illustrated in Fig 6
. Lemakalim caused a dose-dependent
increase in CBF before L-NAME. Blockade of NO formation resulted in
reductions (P<.01) of CBF responses (Fig 7
).
The percent inhibition of CBF responses created by L-NAME was inversely
related to the dose of lemakalim. Both the volume and the duration of
CBF responses to lemakalim were smaller (P<.01) after
L-NAME.
|
|
CBF responses to acetylcholine 3.0 ng/kg were reduced (P<.01) after L-NAME, but responses to nitroglycerin 50.0 ng/kg were maintained after blockade of NO formation, as reported above.
Controlled CBF and Blockade of NO Formation or KATP
Channels
The effects of L-NAME on CBF and DCP (when CBF increases were
prevented) with pirbuterol and lemakalim are reported in Fig 8
. Consistent with responses elicited with normal CBF,
decreases in DCP when CBF was controlled were smaller after L-NAME.
With arterial constriction, CBF increases caused by pirbuterol and
lemakalim were <5% over baseline and did not differ before and after
L-NAME.
|
The effects of glibenclamide on coronary responses elicited by
pirbuterol with normal and controlled CBF are reported in
Fig 9
. After glibenclamide, pirbuterol caused
smaller decreases in DCP when CBF was controlled. The residual
increases in CBF during arterial constriction did not differ
before and after glibenclamide.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, CBF responses were used as an index of changes of vascular tone in resistance vessels. Given that only 20% of the pressure loss across the coronary circulation occurs in vessels >200 µm23 and that large epicardial coronary vessels contribute little to overall coronary resistance (2% to 5%),24 CBF responses reported in the present study should primarily reflect changes of vascular tone in vessels <200 µm, where the highest resistance resides. Dilation of vessels with a higher caliber would be expected to have a minor influence on CBF responses. In the present study, the chronic treatment with aspirin, targeting the blockade of cyclooxygenase and the reduction of platelet aggregation for maintaining the patency of the IC catheters may have influenced our data by changing the level of NO synthase activity. This possibility should be kept in mind when the present data are considered.
The involvement of NO formation in ß-adrenergic dilation remains a debated issue. In isolated canine epicardial coronary vessels, ß-adrenergic relaxation has been reported to be endothelium-independent25 26 as well as partially endothelium-dependent.27 28 In contrast, in conscious dogs, L-NAME antagonized CBF responses triggered by ß2-adrenergic stimulation, consistent with the involvement of an endothelium-dependent process.15 A receptor-operated process rather than a flow-dependent phenomenon was involved, because blockade of ß-adrenergic dilation by L-NAME could be demonstrated even when CBF increases were prevented.15 The apparent discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro data may be related to segmental differences in the vessels studied, ie, conductance and resistance coronary vessels.
Our data are in general agreement with several recent reports in which KATP channels intervened in ß-adrenergic effects.1 2 3 6 We can only speculate on the reason why our data differed from those reported by Narishige et al,1 in which increases in CBF caused by ß1-adrenergic stimulation were blocked by glibenclamide but ß2-adrenergic responses were not. Aside from the fact that Narishige et al1 studied anesthetized dogs, our study differed in the use of a higher dose of glibenclamide to block KATP channels. Perhaps a more complete blockade of KATP channels was achieved in our study. In our hands, glibenclamide reduced CBF responses to lemakalim 100.0 ng/kg by >85%, whereas in the study by Narishige et al,1 glibenclamide effects were limited to a 45% attenuation of responses of pinacidil 30 µg/min.
Conceivably, the effects of glibenclamide on ß2-adrenergic dilation could be secondary to the blockade of ß2-adrenergic receptors by the KATP channel blocker. Our data do not directly allow us to rule out this possibility. However, in an earlier study, Randall and McCulloch3 showed that glibenclamide 1 nmol/L to 100 µmol/L did not displace the specific [3H]dihydroalprenolol binding from rat ß-adrenergic receptors. Consistent with this observation, glibenclamide did not prevent increases in contractility caused by isoproterenol in anesthetized dogs,1 as would be expected if ß-adrenergic blockade were involved. In the present study, the highest rate of IC glibenclamide delivery created an estimated IC concentration in the range of 10-5 mol/L, which should not have interfered with ß-adrenergic receptor activation.3
Lemakalim, the active enantiomer of cromakalim, acts as a hyperpolarizing agent and creates vasodilation by opening KATP channels.19 20 Our data are consistent with a selective action of lemakalim on KATP channels, because glibenclamide, a blocker of KATP channels,29 was a powerful antagonist of lemakalim-induced dilation of resistance coronary vessels. Furthermore, the unaltered CBF responses to nitroglycerin and acetylcholine after glibenclamide suggest a maintained coronary reactivity after blockade of KATP channels. This also rules out the possibilities that a decrease in baseline CBF caused by glibenclamide led to smaller CBF responses or that blockade of KATP channels interfered with processes related to NO formation or its action on vascular smooth muscles.
The contribution of NO formation to lemakalim-induced increases in CBF along with the blockade of ß2-adrenergic dilation by either glibenclamide or L-NAME supports the possibility that opening of KATP channels triggers NO formation during ß2-adrenergic stimulation. Consistent with this hypothesis, KATP channels have been demonstrated to intervene in the regulation of endothelial cell membrane potentials. Lückhoff and Busse7 8 have further established that the Ca2+ influx into endothelial cells and the formation of endothelium-derived relaxing factor triggered by openers of KATP channels are secondary to cellular hyperpolarization. Openers of KATP channels prolong K+ currents elicited by bradykinin and augment Ca2+ entry into those cells.7 8 Endothelial K+ channels activated by shear stress can also cause membrane hyperpolarization, which promotes Ca2+ influx and augments NO formation.30 31 KATP channels have been reported to account for the release of NO caused by adenosine.32 Our data suggest that a similar mechanism involving KATP channels as the triggering mechanism of NO formation intervenes in the cascade of reaction leading to ß2-adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels.
In addition to an action on the endothelium, a direct effect of pirbuterol on vascular smooth muscle could also be involved in glibenclamide-sensitive ß2-adrenergic vasodilation. In this connection, Nakashima and Vanhoutte2 reported that smooth muscle relaxation of the canine saphenous vein induced by ß2-adrenergic agonists involved KATP channels. Although our data with L-NAME suggest that NO is a major intermediate in ß2-adrenergic relaxation, the residual vasodilation after blockade of NO formation may reflect the involvement of a different mechanism, perhaps a direct smooth muscle relaxation caused by ß2-adrenergic stimulation. An incomplete blockade of NO formation in resistance coronary vessels may also explain the residual acetylcholine and ß2-adrenergic CBF responses after L-NAME, in which case the contribution of a direct smooth muscle effect of ß2-adrenergic stimulation could only be overestimated by the present data.
The relative contribution of NO formation to overall lemakalim
responses was inversely related to the dose of the agonist used. For
example, NO formation accounted for
70% of peak increases in CBF
caused by 20.0 ng/kg lemakalim but only for 30% of the response to
100.0 ng/kg lemakalim. This may explain why opposite conclusions
regarding the role of NO formation were reached when a single dose of
an opener of KATP channels was studied in
vivo.14 33
The possibility that L-NAME or glibenclamide interfered with pirbuterol and lemakalim effects on CBF by blocking a flow-dependent component was studied directly in separate experiments in which DCP was used as an index of vascular tone of resistance vessels when CBF increases were prevented. Consistent with our initial observations, in which L-NAME reduced CBF responses to pirbuterol and lemakalim when CBF was normal, L-NAME reduced the fall in DCP when CBF was controlled. Glibenclamide also antagonized the CBF responses to pirbuterol in normal conditions and the fall in DCP when CBF was controlled. Thus, L-NAME and glibenclamide did not interfere with pirbuterol and lemakalim responses solely by blocking a flow-dependent component, consistent with our contention that opening of KATP channels may be the mechanism triggering NO formation.
In conclusion, ß2-adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels involves both the opening of KATP channels and NO formation. A causal relationship between the opening of KATP channels and NO formation is suggested by the finding of smaller CBF responses to an opener of KATP channels after L-NAME.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 5, 1996; revision received October 12, 1996; accepted November 4, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-receptor
mediated vasoconstriction in the canine coronary circulation.
Circ Res. 1978;43:908-917. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Shi, Z. Wu, N. Cui, W. Shi, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, A. Rojas, B. T. Ha, and C. Jiang PKA phosphorylation of SUR2B subunit underscores vascular KATP channel activation by beta-adrenergic receptors Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1205 - R1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fernandez, L. Monge, A. L. Garcia-Villalon, and G. Dieguez Coronary reactive hyperaemia and arterial pressure in anaesthetized goats Exp Physiol, September 1, 2006; 91(5): 915 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lei, K. Matsuo, V. Labinskyy, N. Sharma, M. P. Chandler, A. Ahn, T. H. Hintze, W. C. Stanley, and F. A. Recchia Exogenous nitric oxide reduces glucose transporters translocation and lactate production in ischemic myocardium in vivo PNAS, May 10, 2005; 102(19): 6966 - 6971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Hein, C. Zhang, W. Wang, and L. Kuo Heterogeneous {beta}2-Adrenoceptor Expression and Dilation in Coronary Arterioles Across the Left Ventricular Wall Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2708 - 2712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okajima, R. Parent, E. Thorin, and M. Lavallee Pathophysiological plasma ET-1 levels antagonize {beta}-adrenergic dilation of coronary resistance vessels in conscious dogs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1476 - H1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gellman, J. M. Hare, C. J. Lowenstein, G. Gerstenblith, V. Coombs, P. Langenberg, J. A. Brinker, and J. R. Resar L-Arginine Ameliorates the Abnormal Sympathetic Response of the Dysfunctional Human Coronary Microvasculature Angiology, January 1, 2004; 55(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-P. Zhang, H. Tada, Z. Wang, and T. H. Hintze cAMP Signal Transduction, A Potential Compensatory Pathway for Coronary Endothelial NO Production After Heart Failure Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2002; 22(8): 1273 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sun, A. Huang, S. Mital, M. R. Kichuk, C. C. Marboe, L. J. Addonizio, R. E. Michler, A. Koller, T. H. Hintze, and G. Kaley Norepinephrine Elicits {beta}2-Receptor-Mediated Dilation of Isolated Human Coronary Arterioles Circulation, July 30, 2002; 106(5): 550 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang and T. H. Hintze cAMP Signal Transduction Cascade, a Novel Pathway for the Regulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production in Coronary Blood Vessels Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 797 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. W. Broeders, P. A. Doevendans, B. C. A. M. Bekkers, R. Bronsaer, E. van Gorsel, J. W. M. Heemskerk, M. G. A. o. Egbrink, E. van Breda, R. S. Reneman, and R. van der Zee Nebivolol: A Third-Generation {beta}-Blocker That Augments Vascular Nitric Oxide Release : Endothelial {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor-Mediated Nitric Oxide Production Circulation, August 8, 2000; 102(6): 677 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pagliaro, N. Paolocci, T. Isoda, W. F Saavedra, G. Sunagawa, and D. A Kass Reversal of glibenclamide-induced coronary vasoconstriction by enhanced perfusion pulsatility: possible role for nitric oxide Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2000; 45(4): 1001 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujii, U. Onaka, K. Goto, I. Abe, and M. Fujishima Impaired Isoproterenol-Induced Hyperpolarization in Isolated Mesenteric Arteries of Aged Rats Hypertension, August 1, 1999; 34(2): 222 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kakoki, Y. Hirata, H. Hayakawa, H. Nishimatsu, Y. Suzuki, D. Nagata, E. Suzuki, K. Kikuchi, T. Nagano, and M. Omata Effects of Vasodilatory ß-Adrenoceptor Antagonists on Endothelium-Derived Nitric Oxide Release in Rat Kidney Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 467 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ming, R. Parent, E. Thorin, and M. Lavallee Endothelin-Dependent Tone Limits Acetylcholine-Induced Dilation of Resistance Coronary Vessels After Blockade of NO Formation in Conscious Dogs Hypertension, November 1, 1998; 32(5): 844 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takamura, R. Parent, and M. Lavallee Enhanced contribution of NO to exercise-induced coronary responses after alpha -adrenergic receptor blockade Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H508 - H515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||