(Circulation. 1997;96:106-115.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Correspondence to Jan J. Piek, MD, Department of Cardiology, B2108, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Patients with one-vessel disease and recruitable (n=14) or spontaneously visible (n=24) collateral vessels were studied during coronary angioplasty. Collateral flow in the recipient coronary artery was determined with a 0.014-in Doppler guide wire during balloon coronary occlusion and expressed as the diastolic blood flow velocity integral (dVi). Collateral blood flow velocity, mean aortic pressure (Pao), and coronary wedge pressure (Pw) were used to calculate the collateral vascular resistance index: Rcoll=(Pao-Pw)/dVi (mm Hg/cm) and the peripheral vascular resistance index of the recipient coronary artery: R4=Pw/dVi (mm Hg/cm). Adenosine (12 to 18 µg) and nitroglycerin (0.2 mg) were injected as a bolus in the donor coronary artery during subsequent balloon inflations to assess their effect on these hemodynamic variables. The administration of adenosine or nitroglycerin in patients with recruitable collateral vessels did not induce a change in dVi and Pw/Pao ratio. In patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels, dVi increased from 8.0±4.5 to 10.8±8.0 cm (P=.01) after adenosine and from 7.4±4.5 to 10.3±6.9 cm (P=.003) after nitroglycerin. The Pw/Pao ratio remained unchanged after adenosine and nitroglycerin. Rcoll decreased from 10.3±9.5 to 8.6±8.5 mm Hg/cm (P=.01) after adenosine and from 11.6±10.4 to 8.3±8.9 mm Hg/cm (P<.001) after nitroglycerin. R4 decreased from 7.7±5.5 to 5.9±5.1 mm Hg/cm (P<.001) after adenosine and from 8.4±6.6 to 7.1±7.2 mm Hg/cm (P=.01) after nitroglycerin.
Conclusions Coronary collateral blood flow can be increased with adenosine and nitroglycerin in patients with one-vessel disease and spontaneously visible collateral vessels, which is in contrast to patients with recruitable collateral vessels. This effect is the result of a reduction in the collateral vascular resistance and peripheral vascular resistance of the recipient coronary artery.
Key Words: coronary disease collateral circulation angioplasty hemodynamics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac Catheterization
All antianginal medications and aspirin (100 mg) were continued
until cardiac catheterization. Lorazepam (1 mg) was
administered orally before the procedure. At the beginning of the
catheterization, all patients received heparin
intravenously (5000 U) as a bolus. Additional heparin was
administered if the procedure lasted >90 minutes.
Nitroglycerin (0.1 mg IC) was administered only for the
occurrence of coronary spasm. Cardiac
catheterization was performed using the
percutaneous femoral approach. A 6F or 7F sheath was
inserted into both the right and left femoral arteries. One guiding
catheter was used for the introduction of a Doppler guide wire and
the balloon catheter in the recipient coronary artery, and one
guiding catheter was used for angiography of the donor coronary
artery and the administration of vasodilators.
Study Protocol
Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Angiography of the donor artery was performed before angioplasty
with automatic contrast injection (Angiomat 3000, Liebel-Flarsheim Co;
right coronary artery, 4 to 6 mL, 7 mL/s; left coronary
artery, 6 to 8 mL, 9 mL/s). Cineangiography was continued until there
was no further opacification of the injected vascular bed. A repeat
arteriogram of the donor artery was obtained at 30 seconds during the
first balloon inflation. The severity of the coronary
narrowings was assessed with an automated contour detection algorithm
(ARTREK, ADAC Laboratories) in two orthogonal projections, using
the guiding catheter as a reference, to determine the percentage
diameter stenosis and minimal luminal diameter. A
stenosis was considered subtotal (95% diameter
stenosis) if there was an interruption of contrast medium but
complete and brisk filling of the distal part of the stenosed artery. A
stenosis was considered a functional occlusion (99% diameter
stenosis) if there was an interruption of contrast medium with
a slow filling of the distal part of the coronary artery (TIMI
1). A total coronary occlusion was defined as an interruption
of contrast medium without antegrade filling of the distal part of the
artery (TIMI 0).
Collateral vessels were graded according to Rentrop's classification: 0 indicates no filling of collateral vessels; 1, filling of collateral vessels without any epicardial filling of the artery to be dilated; 2, partial epicardial filling by collateral vessels of the artery to be dilated; and 3, complete epicardial filling by collateral vessels of the artery to be dilated. The grading of the collateral vessels was performed independently by two angiographers, and a consensus was reached in the event of disagreement. Collateral vessels were considered recruitable when they were absent before coronary occlusion (grade 0 or 1) and present during coronary occlusion (grade 2 or 3). Collateral vessels were classified spontaneously visible when they were grade 2 or 3 before angioplasty.
Coronary Hemodynamics
Aortic pressure was measured at the tip of the guiding catheter.
The coronary occlusion wedge pressure was measured at the tip
of the balloon catheter through the fluid-filled lumen during balloon
inflation. The heart rate was obtained from the ECG and monitored
throughout the procedure.
Collateral Flow Velocity
A 0.014-in Doppler guide wire equipped with a Doppler
crystal at its tip (Flowire, Cardiometrics) was inserted in the
recipient coronary artery to assess collateral blood flow
velocity distal to the balloon during coronary occlusion.
Coronary blood flow velocity in the recipient artery was
assessed during the first and subsequent balloon inflations of
1-minute duration. Collateral flow was considered present in the
case of a partial or complete diastolic blood flow velocity
signal of >5 cm/s. The Doppler signals of the Doppler guide
wire were generated with a 12-MHz pulsed Doppler
velocimeter and processed with a real-time spectral
analyzer using fast Fourier transformation (Flowmap,
Cardiometrics). Collateral flow in the recipient coronary
artery was determined on the basis of Vi, dVi, and dMPV. These
collateral blood flow velocity parameters were assessed
off-line through manual tracing of the peak blood flow velocity pattern
from a digitized video frame, averaged over three consecutive beats,
and corrected for heart rate by using a software program available on
the Internet (NIH Images 1.58, National Institutes of Health). The
blood flow velocity signals (retrograde or antegrade) were expressed as
an absolute value. Rcoll was assessed by relating dVi measured during
balloon inflation in the recipient coronary artery to the
pressure gradient on the collateral vascular bed: Rcoll=(Pao-Pw)/dVi
(mm Hg/cm). R4 was calculated with the following equation: R4=Pw/dVi
(mm Hg/cm).
Pw/Pao can be expressed with the following equation (see "Appendix"): Pw/Pao=R4/(Rcoll+R4).
Vasodilators
Adenosine (12 to 18 µg) or
nitroglycerin (0.2 mg) was injected as a bolus in the
donor coronary artery during the second and third balloon
inflations, respectively, to determine the effect on the collateral
blood flow velocity parameters and the ratio of
hyperemic to baseline dVi. The blood flow velocity signals
(retrograde or antegrade) during hyperemia were expressed as an
absolute value. The effect of the adenosine or
nitroglycerin on Pw/Pao was assessed during subsequent,
separate balloon inflations after withdrawal of the guide
wire.
Wall Motion Score
The regional wall motion of the perfusion territory of the
narrowed or occluded coronary artery in patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels were scored as hyperkinetic
(-1), normal (0), hypokinetic (1), akinetic (2), dyskinetic (3), or
aneurysmatic (4) based on the findings of
echocardiography or contrast left ventriculography.
To determine the relationship with pharmacological modulation of
collateral blood flow velocity, patients with a normal or hypokinetic
wall motion were classified as having normal wall motion (n=13) and
patients with an akinetic, a dyskinetic, or an aneurysmal wall
motion were classified as having abnormal wall motion (n=11).
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD and were
compared with the use of the unpaired Student's t test. The
two-tailed paired t test was used to determine the effect of
adenosine or nitroglycerin on the
hemodynamic and blood flow velocity
parameters. The degree of association between variables
was evaluated with the correlation coefficient. A value of
P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Angiography of Collateral Vessels
In the 11 patients with recruitable collateral vessels (group 1),
collateral vessels were graded 0 in 6 patients and graded 1 in 5
patients, and during balloon coronary occlusion, vessels were
graded 2 in 8 patients and 3 in 3 patients. A total of 6 patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels (group 2) were graded 2 and 18
patients were graded 3 before the balloon coronary occlusion.
During balloon coronary occlusion, 4 patients were graded 2 and
20 patients were graded 3. Collateral vessels were fully absent (grade
0) after the successful completion of the procedure in all
patients.
Wall Motion Score
The regional wall motion of the narrowed or occluded vascular bed
of the patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels was
graded as hyperkinetic (n=0), normal (n=10), hypokinetic (n=3),
akinetic (n=7), dyskinetic (n=2), or aneurysmal (n=2).
Collateral Blood Flow Velocity
A complete diastolic collateral blood flow velocity
signal of >5 cm/s was noted in 36% of the patients with recruitable
collateral vessels, whereas a complete diastolic collateral
blood flow velocity signal was obtained in 88% of the patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels (P<.01). dVi of
the patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels (group 2)
was larger compared with the patients with recruitable collateral
vessels (group 1) before the administration of adenosine and
nitroglycerin (8.0±4.5 versus 3.8±2.9 cm,
P<.01; 7.4±4.5 versus 4.2±3.8 cm, P<.05,
respectively; Table 2
). The other blood flow velocity
parameters did not demonstrate a difference between group 1
and group 2 before the administration of the vasodilators.
|
Coronary Wedge Pressure
Pw/Pao values before the administration of adenosine or
nitroglycerin were lower in the patients with
recruitable collateral vessels than in the patients with spontaneously
visible collateral vessels (0.36±0.13 versus 0.45±0.12,
P=.04; 0.36±0.15 versus 0.44±0.11, P=.05,
respectively).
Resistance Calculations
Rcoll of the patients with recruitable collateral vessels was
higher compared with the patients with spontaneously visible
collateral vessels before the administration of adenosine and
nitroglycerin (29.0±27.5 versus 10.3±9.5
mm Hg/cm, P=.005; 35.8±44.8 versus 11.6±10.4
mm Hg/cm, P=.02, respectively). R4 was higher in patients
with recruitable collateral vessels compared with patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels before the administration of
adenosine (12.7±7.4 versus 7.7±5.5 mm Hg/cm,
P=.03). There was no difference between the baseline values
before the administration of nitroglycerin (Table 2
).
Pharmacological Modulation
Hemodynamics
The effect of adenosine administration on resting
hemodynamics varied between the patient groups. In
the patients with recruitable collateral vessels, aortic pressure
and heart rate remained unchanged after the administration of
adenosine (91±9 versus 90±13 mm Hg, P=.58;
63±11 versus 65±10 bpm, P=.19). In the patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels, heart rate increased from
67±12 to 69±13 bpm after the administration of adenosine
(P=.07). The aortic pressure decreased from 99±11 to
95±11 mm Hg after the administration of adenosine
(P<.01).
Intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin induced a decrease in the aortic pressure in the patients with recruitable collateral vessels and patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels (93±10 versus 90±12 mm Hg, P<.05; 99±11 versus 96±11 mm Hg, P<.005, respectively). Heart rate did not change in the patients with recruitable collateral vessels (62±10 versus 64±9 bpm, P=.15) but increased in the patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels (66±13 versus 68±13 bpm, P<.005).
Collateral Blood Flow Velocity
The administration of adenosine or
nitroglycerin did not induce an increase in collateral
blood flow velocity in patients with recruitable collateral vessels
(Table 2
). All blood flow velocity parameters increased
significantly after the administration of adenosine or
nitroglycerin in patients with spontaneously visible
collateral vessels (Table 2
and Fig 1
). A positive
signal becoming negative or a negative signal becoming positive after
the administration of vasodilators was not noted in any of the
patients. The majority of the patients with spontaneously visible
collateral vessels demonstrated an increase in dVi. However, in a few
patients, dVi remained unchanged or decreased during hyperemia
(Table 3
and Fig 2A
and 2B
). Fig 3A
shows the correlation between the effect of
adenosine and nitroglycerin on dVi
(r=.76, P<.001).
|
|
|
|
The ratio of the hyperemic versus baseline dVi in patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels was higher than that in patients with recruitable collateral vessels after the administration of adenosine (1.3±0.5 versus 1.0±0.2, P=.02) and nitroglycerin (1.4±0.6 versus 1.0±0.2, P=.03). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the ratio of dVi in patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels and a normal wall motion (n=13) compared with patients with an abnormal wall motion (n=11) after the administration of adenosine (1.2±0.4 versus 1.5±0.6, P=.25) or nitroglycerin (1.3±0.4 versus 1.5±0.8, P=.43).
Coronary Wedge Pressure
The administration of vasodilators did not induce a significant
difference in overall Pw/Pao in patients with recruitable or
spontaneously visible collateral vessels (Table 2
). The variability of
the change in Pw/Pao in the individual patient with spontaneously
visible collateral vessels is illustrated in Fig 2A
and 2B
. Baseline
Pw/Pao was higher in patients demonstrating a decrease in Pw/Pao after
the administration of vasodilators compared with patients showing an
increase in Pw/Pao (adenosine, 0.53±0.11 versus 0.38±0.07,
P=.001; nitroglycerin, 0.50±0.15 versus
0.41±0.07, P=.05). The correlation between the effect of
adenosine and nitroglycerin on Pw/Pao is
depicted in Fig 3B
(r=.64, P=.001).
Resistance Calculation
The administration of adenosine and
nitroglycerin did not reduce Rcoll and R4 in patients
with recruitable collateral vessels (Table 2
). In patients with
spontaneously visible collateral vessels, both Rcoll and R4 decreased
after the administration of the vasodilators (Table 2
). The correlation
between the effects of adenosine and
nitroglycerin on Rcoll and R4 is shown in Fig 3C
and 3D
(r=.76, P<.001; and r=.53,
P=.007, respectively). Patients with an increase in Pw/Pao
after the administration of vasodilators were characterized with a
predominant reduction of Rcoll compared with the reduction in R4 (after
adenosine, -16±28% versus -5±32%, P=.004;
after nitroglycerin, -31±28% versus -9±36%,
P<.001, respectively). On the other hand, patients with a
decrease in Pw/Pao after the administration of vasodilators showed a
more pronounced reduction in R4 compared with the reduction in Rcoll
(after adenosine, -29±24% versus 5±32%,
P<.001; after nitroglycerin, -17±24%
versus 17±38%, P=.002, respectively).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intracoronary Blood Flow Velocity Analysis for
Assessment of Collateral Flow
Collateral blood flow can be assessed in the setting of
coronary angioplasty through intracoronary blood flow
velocity analysis in the donor or recipient coronary
artery.9 12 13 This study is the first report of a cohort
of patients concerning the application of intracoronary blood
flow velocity analysis in humans for evaluation of the
pharmacological modulation of Rcoll. These observations were performed
in patients with one-vessel disease to avoid unpredictable effects on
coronary hemodynamics related to the presence
of multivessel disease.
Only a limited number of studies have been reported regarding the
assessment of collateral flow with a Doppler guide wire during
balloon coronary occlusion. Recent studies by Yamada et
al14 and Bach et al15 involve the assessment
of collateral flow in patients in whom half had spontaneously visible
collateral vessels in the presence of subtotal or total
coronary occlusions. The magnitude of a collateral peak
velocity integral of
10 cm in the presence of spontaneously visible
collateral vessels in these studies is in accordance with our results.
These investigations demonstrate the feasibility of studying the
physiology of the collateral circulation during brief balloon
coronary occlusion. However, recruitability of collateral
vessels was not evaluated, and pharmacological modulation of collateral
vascular resistance was not studied.
Pharmacological Modulation of Collateral Flow in Humans
Collateral flow and its pharmacological responsiveness in
conscious humans have been measured in the setting of coronary
angioplasty through measurement of the great cardiac vein flow during
balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary
artery.3 4 10 11 However, experimental data have led to
questioning of the accuracy of the use of the great cardiac vein flow
to assess collateral flow to the left anterior descending vascular
bed.8
A noninvasive study using perfusion scintigraphy by Aoki et al5 in patients with a chronic coronary occlusion reported an improvement in flow to collateral-dependent vascular regions after the intravenous administration of nitroglycerin. These observations coincide with more recent studies in patients with a chronic coronary occlusion who were evaluated with the use of positron emission tomography after the intravenous administration of dipyridamole.6 7 The ratio of hyperemic to baseline myocardial blood flow to the collateral-dependent areas varied in these studies from 1.4±0.6 to 1.9±1.0, respectively. However, the improvement in myocardial perfusion after the administration of vasodilators may have been the result of alterations in preload or afterload as well as a direct vasodilating effect on collateral vessels. To minimize its influence on preload or afterload, the effect of vasodilators on collateral blood flow velocity was studied in the present study after intracoronary administration. Although in the present study, changes in blood pressure and heart rate were noted after the intracoronary administration of either nitroglycerin or adenosine, these hemodynamic effects were less pronounced than those reported after the intravenous administration of dipyridamole.6 Nevertheless, the increase in collateral blood flow velocity in the present study is surprisingly similar to the increase in myocardial perfusion of the collateral-dependent vascular areas as determined with positron emission tomography.
Although the magnitude of collateral flow velocity response in our study was in accordance with that of Vanoverschelde et al,7 we were unable to confirm their observation that a larger ratio of hyperemic to baseline collateral blood flow velocity was noted in patients with a normal left ventricular function. This nonuniformity of study results and the small number of patients (n=11) reported in the study of Vanoverschelde et al indicate that the factors influencing the collateral blood flow velocity response require further study in a larger cohort of patients.
Pharmacological Modulation of Collateral Vascular Resistance Index
in Humans
Several studies with the coronary angioplasty model
demonstrated that the angiographic development of collateral vessels is
positively associated with Pw/Pao, presumably related to a reduction in
collateral vascular resistance.16 17 18 19 In a recent study by
Pijls et al,20 the development of collateral circulation
was expressed as a pressure-derived fractional collateral blood flow
index (ie, Pw/Pao after correction for the central venous pressure).
Rcoll was determined in the present study through measurement of
collateral blood flow velocity in combination with assessment of
Pw/Pao. The results of this study illustrate that the combined
measurements provide additional information on the effect of
vasodilators on Rcoll as it would be concealed through measurement of
Pw/Pao only (Table 2
). For example, the patient depicted in Fig 1
demonstrated a marked increase in blood flow velocity and a reduction
in Rcoll and R4 after the administration of adenosine, whereas
Pw/Pao remained unchanged (Table 4
, patient 21). It
should be emphasized that the diameter of the recipient
coronary artery was considered to remain constant for the
calculation of Rcoll. This limitation of the technique may explain why
an increase or a decrease in Pw/Pao was noted in some patients in the
presence of minimal blood flow velocity changes as a result of
underestimation of alterations in volume blood flow due to vasodilation
(Fig 2A
and 2B
). The results of the present study indicate that the
resistance of recruitable collateral vessels does not respond to
vasodilators, which coincides with experimental studies showing that
the vascular wall of collateral vessels in recent coronary
occlusion consists of a small layer of smooth muscle
cells.21 This contrasts with the vascular wall alterations
in chronic coronary occlusion showing multiple layers of smooth
muscle cells oriented in longitudinal and circular
layers.21 These morphological alterations may provide an
explanation for the observations in the present study of a
pharmacological responsiveness of recruitable collateral vessels that
contrasts with that of spontaneously visible collateral vessels.
|
The increase in the collateral blood flow velocity after the
administration of adenosine or nitroglycerin is
the result of a reduction in both Rcoll and R4. There is a good
agreement between the effects on adenosine and
nitroglycerin on the Rcoll, whereas there is a
variable response for R4 (Fig 3C
and 3D
). This effect on R4
explains in part the variability of the response of adenosine
and nitroglycerin on Pw/Pao (Fig 3B
and Equation 5
). An
increase or decrease in Pw/Pao during the administration of
vasodilators relates to the baseline Pw/Pao. A high Pw/Pao predisposes
to a reduction in this ratio during hyperemia, presumably as a
result of a recovery of autoregulation of the resistance vessels due to
marked collateral vascular development.
It is noteworthy that the induction of hyperemia in the donor artery did not result in general in a decrease in collateral blood flow velocity in the recipient coronary artery and reduction in Pw/Pao due to a "steal" phenomenon.22 23 This suggests that the hyperemia in the donor vascular bed does not result in a decrease in collateral driving pressure due to a pressure drop in the epicardial donor coronary artery (see "Appendix"). It is conceivable that the rare occurrence of this phenomenon in the patients studied is related to the selection criterion (one-vessel disease) of the patients.
Study Limitations
The present study concerns a selected cohort of patients with
one-vessel disease, and the findings of this study cannot be
extrapolated to the general category of patients with collateral
vessels associated with multivessel disease or diffuse coronary
artery disease that may or may not be apparent on coronary
angiography. Coronary steal is a well-documented phenomenon in
coronary artery disease, and the beneficial effects of
vasodilators in the patients studied are potentially harmful in other
categories of patients.22 23
Collateral flow in this study was evaluated through intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis. Angiographic studies have reported that the intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin may result in a 30% to 50% increase in the diameter of the donor and recipient coronary artery.24 This indicates that the observed changes of collateral blood flow velocity in spontaneously visible collateral vessels after the administration of nitroglycerin may underestimate the true alterations in volume flow. On the contrary, our observations do not exclude the possibility that some changes in collateral volume flow may have occurred in the presence of recruitable collateral flow that was concealed due to vasodilation of the recipient coronary artery. Moreover, the epicardial blood flow velocity analysis in the setting of recruitability of collateral vessels may be unable to detect alterations in collateral flow at the myocardial level and therefore may obscure the effect of vasodilators in this situation. The effect of vasodilators was determined with the alterations in coronary hemodynamics and was not extended to the evaluation of improvement of global or regional left ventricular function. The present study was not designed to evaluate the relation between the hemodynamics of the collateral circulation and the restoration of left ventricular function after successful recanalization.
The patients studied represent a selection of symptomatic patients, and this potentially introduces selection bias with respect to potential functional capacity of the coronary collateral circulation. Finally, the limited number of studies conducted on this subject requires further confirmation by other investigators.
Clinical Implications
Numerous studies have indicated that collateral vessels play an
important role in the outcome of acute coronary syndromes. The
presence of collateral vessels during abrupt coronary occlusion
in acute myocardial infarction results in a reduction in infarct size,
exerts an additional beneficial effect on preservation of left
ventricular function after thrombolytic
therapy, and prevents aneurysm formation in patients with
sustained coronary occlusion.25 26 27 28 29 It is possible
that the pharmacological responsiveness of spontaneously visible
collateral vessels, as documented in the present study, constitutes
the background for the observed endorsement of
thrombolytic therapy with nitroglycerin
treatment in the presence of collateral vessels.30
Although the present study indicates that recruitable collateral
vessels are not responsive to vasodilatory therapy, these vessels
become spontaneously visible, and potentially responsive to
pharmacological modulation in the relatively short time span of 10 to
14 days in sustained coronary occlusion.31
Consequently, the pharmacological responsiveness of collateral vessels
in this situation may alleviate cardiac symptoms or improve left
ventricular function. These findings may stimulate further
research for evaluation of other pharmacological agents that are
effective in modulating coronary collateral vascular
resistance.
Furthermore, a recent study suggests that the collateral flow increase after the administration of vasodilators in patients with a chronic coronary occlusion may be positively related to the functional integrity of the myocardium, as reflected by the left ventricular function.7 Although this relationship was evaluated in a limited number of patients, the potential impact requires further analysis before and after revascularization. In addition, the observed large variation in the collateral flow response in patients with spontaneously visible collateral vessels requires further study because it may be important to select patients who might benefit from conservative therapy or who are candidates for revascularization.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The coronary vasculature is represented as
resistors exhibiting ideal current-voltage behavior: V=I*R (Fig 2
). The
voltage (V) is expressed as the pressure gradient, and the current (I)
is the diastolic blood flow velocity integral. The central
venous pressure is assumed to be zero.
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
Examples
The interaction among Rcoll, R4, and Pw/Pao is illustrated in
two patients. Equation 5
indicates that an increase in Pw/Pao can be
accounted for by a pronounced reduction in Rcoll compared with R4. This
is demonstrated in patient No 21 (Table 4
). In this patient, the effect
of nitroglycerin on Rcoll was more pronounced (87%
reduction) than that on R4 (65% reduction), resulting in an increase
in Pw/Pao. The same patient showed a similar reduction in Rcoll (63%)
compared with R4 (60%) after the administration of adenosine,
resulting in a Pw/Pao that remained unchanged.
On the other hand, an increase in blood flow velocity due to a pronounced reduction in R4 compared with Rcoll results in a decrease in Pw/Pao. For example, in patient 10, Rcoll demonstrated a reduction of 4% and R4 demonstrated a reduction of 45% after the administration of adenosine, resulting in a decrease of Pw/Pao from 0.51 to 0.38. The same patient demonstrated a decrease in Pw/Pao from 0.50 to 0.34 after the administration of nitroglycerin due to a pronounced reduction in R4 (58%) compared with Rcoll (17%).
Steal Phenomenon
Coronary steal phenomenon, which is defined as a
reduction in collateral blood flow (velocity) in the recipient
coronary artery after the administration of vasodilators in the
donor coronary artery, can be explained by the presence of a
resistance in the epicardial donor coronary artery (R1). The
electric analog model illustrates that coronary steal may occur
as a result of a reduction in collateral driving pressure due to a
pressure drop across a resistance (R1). In that case, we cannot
eliminate R1 from Equation 4
.
Received November 12, 1996; revision received January 16, 1997; accepted January 29, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Werner, R. Surber, M. Ferrari, M. Fritzenwanger, and H. R. Figulla The functional reserve of collaterals supplying long-term chronic total coronary occlusions in patients without prior myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2406 - 2412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, M. Fritzenwanger, D. Prochnau, G. Schwarz, M. Ferrari, W. Aarnoudse, N. H.J. Pijls, and H. R. Figulla Determinants of Coronary Steal in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: Donor Artery, Collateral, and Microvascular Resistance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Verhoye, B. d. Latour, A. Drochon, and H. Corbineau Collateral flow reserve and right coronary occlusion: evaluation during off-pump revascularization Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2005; 4(1): 23 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, E. Jandt, A. Krack, G. Schwarz, O. Mutschke, F. Kuethe, M. Ferrari, and H. R. Figulla Growth Factors in the Collateral Circulation of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: Relation to Duration of Occlusion and Collateral Function Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 1940 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Fujita and K Tambara Recent insights into human coronary collateral development Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 246 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, U. Emig, O. Mutschke, G. Schwarz, P. Bahrmann, and H. R. Figulla Regression of Collateral Function After Recanalization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: A Serial Assessment by Intracoronary Pressure and Doppler Recordings Circulation, December 9, 2003; 108(23): 2877 - 2882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. van Royen, J. J Piek, D. A Legemate, W. Schaper, J. Oskam, B. Atasever, M. Voskuil, D. Ubbink, S. H Schirmer, I. Buschmann, et al. Design of the START-trial: STimulation of ARTeriogenesis using subcutaneous application of GM-CSF as a new treatment for peripheral vascular disease. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2003; 8(3): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, B. M. Richartz, S. Heinke, M. Ferrari, and H. R. Figulla Impaired acute collateral recruitment as a possible mechanism for increased cardiac adverse events in patients with diabetes mellitus Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2003; 24(12): 1134 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, S. Heinke, F. Kuethe, R. Surber, B. M. Richartz, and H. R. Figulla Angiographic Assessment of Collateral Connections in Comparison With Invasively Determined Collateral Function in Chronic Coronary Occlusions Circulation, April 22, 2003; 107(15): 1972 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner and H. R. Figulla Direct Assessment of Coronary Steal and Associated Changes of Collateral Hemodynamics in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Circulation, July 23, 2002; 106(4): 435 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, S. Betge, O. Gastmann, B. M. Richartz, and H. R. Figulla Collateral Function in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Is Related to Regional Myocardial Function and Duration of Occlusion Circulation, December 4, 2001; 104(23): 2784 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |