Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:1790-1797

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannuzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannuzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. E. S.

(Circulation. 1997;96:1790-1797.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Attenuation of Unfavorable Remodeling by Exercise Training in Postinfarction Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Results of the Exercise in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (ELVD) Trial*

Pantaleo Giannuzzi, MD; Pier Luigi Temporelli, MD; Ugo Corrà, MD; Marinella Gattone, MD; Amerigo Giordano, MD; Luigi Tavazzi, MD; ; for the ELVD Study Group1

From the "Salvatore Maugeri" Foundation, Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione, IRCCS, Division of Cardiology, Rehabilitation Institute of Veruno, Italy.

Correspondence to Dr Pantaleo Giannuzzi, Centro Medico di Riabilitazione, Divisione di Cardiologia, 28010 Veruno (NO), Italy. E-mail cdl{at}intercom.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Background Exercise is currently recommended for patients after myocardial infarction; however, the effects of regular exercise on the remodeling process remain to be defined. The aim of this multicenter, randomized study was to investigate whether a long-term physical training program influences left ventricular size and function in postinfarction patients with systolic dysfunction.

Methods and Results Consecutive patients with <40% ejection fraction after a first Q-wave myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to a 6-month exercise training program (n=39) or control group (n=38). After 6 months, a significant increase in work capacity was observed only in the training group (from 4.462±1.095 to 5.752±1.749 kilopond-meters [Kp-m], P<.01), not in the control group (from 4.375±1.143 to 4.388±1.199 Kp-m), whereas left ventricular volumes had increased in the control group (end-diastolic volume, from 94±26 to 99±27 mL/m2, P<.01; end-systolic volume, from 62±20 to 67±23 mL/m2, P<.01) but not in the training group (end-diastolic volume, from 93±28 to 92±28 mL/m2, P=NS; end-systolic volume, from 61±22 to 57±23 mL/m2, P=NS). Conversely, ejection fraction had improved in the training group (from 34±5% to 38±8%, P<.01) but not in the control group (from 34±5% to 33±7%, P=NS).

Conclusions In postinfarction patients with systolic dysfunction, long-term exercise training may attenuate the unfavorable remodeling response and even improve ventricular function over time.


Key Words: exercise • myocardial infarction • remodeling


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
The beneficial effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs in patients with coronary artery disease are well documented.1 2 Clinical benefits include improved exercise tolerance and quality of life, decreased mortality, and possibly lower costs due to lower rehospitalization rates.1 2 3 4 The results of several uncontrolled, retrospective studies have also suggested that regular exercise may be effective in improving work capacity, even in patients with moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction, without inducing any significant changes in global ventricular function or central hemodynamics.5 6 7 During the past decade, however, questions have been raised about the possible detrimental effects of exercise training on left ventricular function and remodeling among patients with anterior Q-wave infarction.8 A recent randomized, controlled study showed that patients with an initial left ventricular ejection fraction of <40% are prone to global and regional left ventricular dilatation and that physical training does not appear to worsen this anticipated effect.9 Nevertheless, because the group of patients with low ejection fraction in this trial was not large enough to draw a definite conclusion, further studies were recommended to verify whether there are any specific subsets of the population with recent myocardial infarction in whom exercise training may be potentially harmful. To fill this information gap, the Exercise in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (ELVD) study was designed as a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether long-term physical training influences left ventricular size and remodeling in asymptomatic postinfarct patients with systolic dysfunction.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Study Protocol and Organization
The ELVD trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled study in postinfarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction, as defined by an echocardiographic ejection fraction of <40%, and no standard contraindication to exercise who were enrolled at 1 of 15 cardiac rehabilitation centers throughout Italy. All patients underwent functional evaluation both at entry (3 to 5 weeks after a first acute myocardial infarction) and at the end of the study, 6 months later. The functional evaluation included (1) physical examination and chest roentgenogram, (2) Doppler echocardiographic study, (3) standard upright exercise stress testing on a bicycle ergometer, (4) 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring, and (5) psychosocial and quality-of-life assessment. Cardioactive drugs were discontinued for >=48 hours before each evaluation. Coronary artery angiography was also performed during the 6-month period of the study.

After the initial evaluation, patients were randomly allocated to physical training or a control group. All patients provided signed, informed consent before randomization. The principal investigator of the study at the coordinating center of Veruno was responsible for the overall execution of the trial. All data were collected and analyzed at the coordinating center. The study had been approved by the local scientific and ethics committees.

Study Patients
Statistical power calculations for the primary end point of left ventricular end-diastolic volume based on our previous data on the reproducibility of ventricular size by two-dimensional echocardiography in postinfarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction revealed a power of 0.8 to detect a 5% change at 5% significance level with 80 patients completing the trial.

Consecutive patients, survivors of a first acute myocardial infarction, in New York Heart Association functional class I or II were admitted into this prospective study if the following criteria were met: (1) history of a recent (3 to 5 weeks previously) first Q-wave acute myocardial infarction, (2) sinus rhythm and no atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances, (3) echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%, (4) no contraindications to exercise training, and (5) echocardiographic images of adequate quality for quantitative analysis. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was supported by a typical history of chest pain (>30 minutes), evolutionary ECG changes with new abnormal Q waves (>30 ms), a typical pattern of elevated serum myocardial enzyme levels, and persistent left ventricular asynergy on two-dimensional echocardiography. Exclusion criteria were (1) systemic disease, (2) clinical instability (angina at rest and signs or symptoms of heart failure) at the time of the initial evaluation, (3) low-threshold ischemia (<50 W) or exertional angina uncontrolled by medical therapy, (4) low work capacity (<50 W), and (5) inability to participate in a prospective study for any logistic reason.

From January 1993 through June 1994, 108 patients were evaluated for possible enrollment. Twenty-eight patients were excluded because of recurrent angina at rest (n=5), angina or ST depression at low-level exercise (n=15), clinical heart failure (n=5), and low work capacity (n=3). The remaining 80 patients were enrolled and, after the initial evaluation, randomly allocated to a 6-month exercise training program (n=40) or control group (n=40). The patients were not told to expect either training or restricted physical activity to be better for them, merely that we were trying to find out objectively which is better. During the study, they received follow-up at the participating centers that were responsible for the clinical evaluation and management of the exercise training program. Reinfarction, heart failure, angina at rest, reduction of effort angina threshold, exertional angina uncontrolled by medical therapy, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and angioplasty were considered clinical end points and criteria for withdrawal of patients from the study.

Ergometric Test
A multistage symptom-limited bicycle ergometric test was used. Incremental loads of 25 W were given every 3 minutes. The ECG was monitored continuously from lead V5 and recorded on paper from all leads every minute. Sphygmomanometric blood pressure was also measured every 3 minutes. The criteria for stopping the test have been previously reported.9 All tests were carried out by a neutral blinded observer who was unaware of the patient's study group (ie, training status). Heart rate was recorded from the ECG, and rate-pressure product was derived as systolic blood pressure multiplied by heart rate.

Echocardiography: Data Acquisition and Analysis
All patients underwent a complete resting echocardiographic study in multiple views (Hewlett-Packard 77020A) at both the initial and final evaluation; the position of the patient and transducer was noted for use in serial studies. Our methods of data acquisition and image digitalization and the computerized system for the automatic detection and quantification of regional wall motion, left ventricular function, and remodeling have been previously described.9 10 In brief, the three apical (four- and two-chamber and apical long-axis) views were analyzed to assess left ventricular dimensions and function from three different planes and explore six different ventricular walls from the base to the apex of the heart. The endocardial contour of each view was divided by the computer into 23 segments of equal length, so the entire ventricular wall was represented by a total of 69 segments. By comparison with our reference data base of normal subjects, the presence of abnormal wall motion was automatically detected when the fractional shortening area from end diastole to end systole of each segment was <2 SDs of the mean normal values. The extent of wall motion abnormalities was then calculated as a percentage of the total endocardial length. Global ventricular enlargement and regional dilatation were also automatically identified when the total endocardial surface area and segmental areas at the end-diastolic frame exceeded 2 SDs of the mean values in healthy subjects. The extent of regional dilatation was calculated as the percentage of endocardial length of dilated segments to the total endocardial length. Left ventricular ejection fraction was obtained using the biplane area-length method. All measurements were derived in blinded fashion by a single experienced operator (Dr Giannuzzi) from three consecutive cardiac cycles, and the mean values were considered for analysis. Intraobserver variability in endocardial contouring and in the evaluation of end-diastolic and end-systolic endocardial surface areas by our quantitative analysis in both healthy subjects and patients with myocardial infarction in terms of mean of differences was 0.08±0.06 cm2/m2, with the coefficient of repeatability of 1.2 cm2/m2.10

Psychological and Quality-of-Life Assessment
Psychological evaluation was performed with the Cognitive Behavioural Assessment Hospital form (CBA H). CBA H is a standardized 152-item true/false questionnaire divided into four schedules that explore emotional state, vital exhaustion in the 3 months before evaluation, psychological and behavioral traits potentially related to ischemic heart disease, and behavioral lifestyle.11 12 Validation analysis of the CBA H had been performed in 4888 Italian subjects, including healthy volunteers, patients with cardiac conditions, and patients with other diseases (lung disease, breast cancer, hypertension, duodenal ulcer) and had been used in the GISSI-2 population.12 The questionnaire ranges from 0.84 to 0.87 on Cronbach's internal consistency and from 0.42 to 0.63 on retest at 6 months. Quality of life was assessed with modified Likert symptom questionnaires (graded on a six-point scale) on breathlessness, tiredness, chest pain, daily activity, and emotional status.13

Training Intervention
The exercise training program was designed in accordance with the rehabilitation centers taking part in the study. The target heart rate was 80% of that achieved at peak incremental exercise. Initially, patients randomized for physical training participated in a supervised, continuous session of 30-minute bicycle ergometry at least three times a week for 2 months. During each supervised session, intensity of exercise, heart rate (from ECG monitoring), and blood pressure were recorded. Thereafter, they continued the exercise program (30-minute bicycle ergometry three times a week) at home, reporting to the laboratory every 2 weeks when a new level of exercise could be tested and prescribed to maintain the target heart rate (80% of the previously determined maximum) for physical training. The intensity of home-based cycle ergometry was adjusted by using a pulse heart rate monitor (Polar Edge, Polar Electro Oly). In addition, patients were asked to take a brisk daily walk for >30 minutes as part of the home-based exercise program. They were instructed to fill in a diary, reporting the date, time, duration, and pulse heart rate at the end of each nonsupervised exercise session. Patients in the control group received educational and psychological support but no formal exercise program, and they were invited to continue their usual lifestyle but to avoid any physical activity that caused breathlessness or fatigue.

Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared using the unpaired Student's t test for continuous variables and the {chi}2 test for discrete variables. All data were analyzed through a comparison of the initial (at entry) with the final (after 6 months) study. Differences between the two groups and changes over time within each group, as well as any interaction (different trends between groups), were assessed by multivariate repeated measures ANOVA. Differences were considered significant at a value of P<.05. Results are expressed as mean±1 SD.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
A total of 80 patients (76 men and 4 women; mean age, 53±9 years) were enrolled in the study. The majority (78%) had had an anterior myocardial infarction. Mean ejection fraction was 34±4%; mean work capacity and total exercise time at entry were 4.418±1.115 Kp-m and 10.8±2 minutes, respectively. Two patients were withdrawn from the study: one in the training group because of hospitalization for congestive heart failure and one in the control group because of unstable angina requiring coronary artery bypass graft surgery. One patient in the control group died from refractory heart failure; therefore, 77 patients completed the study and represent the final study population. Of them, 39 were in the training group and 38 in the control group.

The initial data for the 77 patients who completed the study are reported in Table 1Down. Clinical data were similar in the two groups; infarct size appeared equivalent, and patients with exercise-induced ST depression, exertional angina, multivessel coronary disease, and patency of infarct-related vessel were equally distributed in the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference between the two groups in the medications received during the 6-month study period (Table 2Down). Of note, the majority of patients in both groups were taking ACE inhibitors at the maximal tolerated dosage, which were usually initiated immediately after the initial evaluation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Initial Patient Data


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Medications During the 6-Month Study Period

Exercise Performance
Heart rate at rest was similar for the two groups at both entry and the final evaluation. Systolic blood pressure at rest decreased significantly after 6 months only in the training group, but the decrease in rate-pressure product observed in this group was not statistically significant. Peak heart rate decreased (P<.01) in both groups, whereas maximal systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product did not change significantly after 6 months. Initially, total work capacity was similar in the two groups; after 6 months, it had not changed in the control group but had increased significantly (P<.001), by 20%, in the training group (Table 3Down). In a comparison of the initial with the final study at the same submaximal work load, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and rate-pressure product did not change in the control group but decreased significantly (P<.01) in the training group (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Ergometric Test

Data on Left Ventricular Function and Remodeling
Initial left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, wall motion abnormalities, and regional dilatation were similar in the two groups (Table 4Down). After 6 months, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and regional dilatation had not changed in the training group, whereas they had increased significantly (P<.01) (by 5%, 8%, and 21%, respectively) in the control group. Conversely, ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities had not changed in the control group, whereas they had improved significantly (P<.01) (ie, ejection fraction increased by 12% and wall motion abnormalities decreased by 10%) in the training group (Table 4Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Left Ventricular Function and Remodeling

Psychological and Quality-of-Life Assessment
All baseline factors examined were similar in the two groups. The most important changes during the study period are reported in Table 5Down. At the final evaluation, both groups demonstrated a significant (P<.01) decrease in life stress perception and depressed mood; these changes, however, were more pronounced, although not significantly, in the training group. Furthermore, social anxiety, easy-goingness, symptoms perceived during daily physical activity, and general well-being significantly (P<.001) improved in the training group but not in the control group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Psychological and Quality-of-Life Assessment


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowAppendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
Physical training is currently recommended for patients after acute myocardial infarction, as well as for patients with other cardiac conditions.1 2 The beneficial effect of cardiac rehabilitation exercise training on exercise tolerance and symptoms is one of the most clearly established favorable outcomes, even in patients with severely depressed ventricular function and compensated chronic heart failure, and particularly in those with decreased functional capacity.5 6 7 8 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 No significant cardiovascular complications or other serious adverse events have been reported in these patients. Moreover, most studies on exercise training in patients with heart failure and moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction do not demonstrate deterioration in left ventricular function and central hemodynamics6 7 15 16 : the favorable training effect in these patients has been attributed predominantly to adaptations in the peripheral circulation and skeletal muscles rather than to adaptations in the cardiac performance.6 15 16 18 Some studies have also suggested the possibility of improving ventricular function through physical training in selected patients with coronary disease.9 20 21 22 However, the available data are limited and often contradictory. Furthermore, the effects of exercise training on ventricular function and remodeling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction have still to be established.

Actually, during the past few years, questions have been raised about the possible detrimental effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Jugdutt et al8 reported a significant deterioration in both global and regional function after anterior Q-wave myocardial infarction in a small group of exercised patients with reduced ejection fraction compared with a matched control group. Although this was not a randomized study and other major limitations were present (ie, standardization of timing of exercise training was lacking), the study had considerable impact on clinical practice, raising the cautionary note that the potential to adversely alter ventricular size and function exists in selected patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Recently, in a randomized, controlled trial, the EAMI Study,9 we documented progressive ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after anterior Q-wave myocardial infarction, but exercise training did not appear to worsen this increasing deterioration. Postinfarction patients with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) showed a comparable spontaneous increase in left ventricular size, both with and without exercise rehabilitation. We concluded that patients with uncomplicated anterior myocardial infarction may benefit from a long-term exercise training program without additional deterioration of ventricular volumes and topography. Nevertheless, compared with the control group, patients with an initial ejection fraction of <40% who underwent exercise training demonstrated less ventricular enlargement (although not statistically significant) and a significant improvement in regional wall motion and global left ventricular function (ejection fraction increased from 35% to 39%). Thus, based on the results of the EAMI Study, we hypothesized that in patients with reduced ejection fraction, exercise training may even lessen the deterioration in left ventricular size and function over time. Further confirmation was obviously needed.

The present study is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial specifically designed to address whether regular exercise influences the remodeling process and ventricular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Our data confirm that a simple home-based exercise training program is feasible and effective in improving exercise tolerance and quality of life in these patients, without cardiovascular complications or other adverse outcomes. The major finding of the present study, however, was that in patients with decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction, long-term exercise training may attenuate the unfavorable remodeling process and even improve both global and regional function over time.

Mechanisms and Significance of Training Effect
Enhanced vasoconstrictor activity, decreased vagal tone, and impaired arterial baroreflex activity (ie, abnormalities in the autonomic control of circulation) have all been described in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without heart failure.23 24 25 The endogenous release of vasoconstrictor neurohormones may eventually play a deleterious role in the progression of ventricular dysfunction and development of congestive heart failure by increasing the loading conditions of the dysfunctioning heart; worsening the remodeling process, particularly in patients with low ejection fraction; and favoring the development of complex arrhythmias.26 Exercise training has been shown to increase functional work capacity, reduce catecholamines and vascular peripheral resistance, and enhance heart rate variability and baroreflex gain in subjects with normal ventricular function27 28 29 as well as in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure.15 The percentage increase in exercise performance in our study was similar to that observed in training programs in normal subjects and in patients with ischemic heart disease with preserved ejection fraction or without heart failure.9 20 21 22 30 The features of the training response are consistent with a normal response to regular exercise, including reduction in resting heart rate (although this was not statistically significant in our study) and blood pressure and reduction in exercise heart rate and rate-pressure product. These findings may reflect beneficial changes in autonomic balance and/or baroreflex gain and are in agreement with the attenuation of the vasoconstrictor influences (mainly due to sympathetic activity) and the increased vagal tone described after training in animals with and without healed myocardial infarction31 and in patients with hypertension29 and heart failure.15

All patients in our study had a reduced ejection fraction and enlarged left ventricle at the time of the initial evaluation. In the control group, left ventricular volumes rose progressively during the 6-month period of the study, ejection fraction remained depressed, and indexes of regional function did not improve. Similar observations have been previously reported.9 32 These data confirm that patients with large infarct and left ventricular dysfunction are prone to progressive ventricular dilatation, which appears to be the major compensatory mechanism after loss of contractile myocardium to restore initially depressed stroke volume, despite unchanged, and still reduced ejection fraction.32 In contrast, in our exercise patients, end-diastolic volume remained unchanged, end-systolic volume decreased, and ejection fraction improved. The improved ejection fraction we found after training is consistent with the training response in normal subjects,33 as well as in selected patients with coronary artery disease,20 21 22 but the mechanism of this has not yet been established. It may be due to enhanced diastolic recoil and/or a true increase in contractile performance. Because the resting heart rate slightly decreased after training, the possibility must be considered that the lengthened diastolic filling period with augmentation of stroke output through the Frank-Starling mechanism may have contributed to the increase in ejection fraction in these patients. However, compared with the control group, our exercise patients did not show a significant change in end-diastolic volume. This suggests that the small reduction in resting heart rate was not the cause of the increased ejection fraction after training. Instead, the decreases in regional wall motion abnormalities and end-systolic volume indicate that an enhanced contractile performance predominantly contributed to the improved ventricular function in our exercise patients. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that in addition to the well known peripheral adaptations,6 14 15 16 18 30 long-term exercise training in postinfarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction may result in direct cardiac adaptations characterized by more favorable remodeling and improved ventricular function.

Possible mechanisms of the training-induced attenuation of the remodeling process and improvement in ventricular performance are a lessened increase in ventricular wall tension, favorable adaptations in the coronary circulation, or both. The beneficial changes in autonomic balance (toward a vagal predominance with attenuation of vasoconstrictive forces) induced by physical training may limit the deleterious effects of sympathetic hyperactivity on left ventricular remodeling and function (antiadrenergic effect). The favorable control on left ventricular wall stress after training, as documented by the significant decrease in submaximal rate-pressure product in our exercise group, may attenuate the deterioration of left ventricular size and function over time and ultimately reverse the unfavorable remodeling process. On the other hand, regular exercise has been shown to favorably affect whole blood flow rheology, enhance vascular function and structure (collaterals and microvasculature), and thereby possibly be of benefit to peripheral and myocardial perfusion.20 34 Several reports have documented a reduction in exercise-induced ischemia, as manifested by ST-segment depression or thallium perfusion abnormalities at matched rate-pressure products after 1 year of exercise training.20 35 36 Physical training may also retard progression of coronary artery disease, and patients participating in regular physical exercise may achieve improvement in myocardial perfusion independently of regressive changes in coronary lesions.36 The improvement in myocardial blood flow of the infarcted area, even late after acute infarction, may lead to a consistent recovery of both regional and global left ventricular function.37 Although results of the present study cannot elucidate the possible effects of exercise training on myocardial perfusion (serial angiographic studies were not performed), we speculate that the decrease in ventricular wall stress, through peripheral adaptations, and possibly the improvement in myocardial perfusion may have facilitated functional recovery of dysfunctioning but still viable perinecrotic myocardial regions in our exercise patients. We have no data, however, to determine which of these or other factors are most operative in the training-induced attenuation of the remodeling response and improvement in contractile function. It should be noted that the majority of patients in both groups received ACE inhibitors as a common policy of treatment of their left ventricular dysfunction, and almost 50% of them were also receiving a ß-blocker, despite their reduced ejection fraction. Thus, postinfarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing regular exercise on "maximal" medical therapy, including ACE inhibitors, may well derive additional symptomatic and functional benefits from physical training. Similar observations have been reported recently in patients with heart failure.17 Because there is a strong resemblance between the systemic and peripheral effects of ACE inhibition and physical training, the possibility should be considered that the long-term effects of a physical conditioning program may be mediated and even enhanced by these drugs, but also vice versa.

Study Limitations
Our patient groups were well matched in terms of initial ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, extent of wall motion abnormalities, and regional dilatation. Baseline clinical characteristics; residual exertional ischemia, as documented by electrocardiographic ST-segment changes; and medications during the 6-month period of the study were also similar between the two groups. Because exertional ischemia, detected by reversible (exercise-rest) perfusion defects on stress scintigraphic imaging, may contribute to progressive ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction38 and due to the low sensitivity of exercise electrocardiography (particularly in patients with anterior infarcts), one limitation could be that we did not use imaging techniques to explore the presence of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Nevertheless, because the proportion of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and the TIMI flow grade of infarct-related vessel were similar between the two groups, exertional ischemia, even at scintigraphic studies (ie, supersilent), should have been equally distributed and thus should not have influenced our results.

We considered for this study patients with rest ejection fraction values of <40% after a recent first Q-wave myocardial infarction (3 to 5 weeks previously). Patients with unstable angina or low-threshold ischemia, as well as with exertional ischemia uncontrolled by medical therapy, and those with clinical heart failure were carefully screened out. Furthermore, patients who had extensive and unstable coronary artery disease requiring surgery and those who developed symptoms of congestive heart failure after randomization did not complete the serial evaluation. Thus, the observed results do not apply to all postinfarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction but only to a selected group of asymptomatic clinically stable patients with no contraindication to exercise.

Conclusions
We confirm that a simple home-based exercise training program is feasible and effective in improving exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction. These patients may benefit from physical training without any additional clinical deterioration or other adverse events. More importantly, our data indicate that in postinfarction patients with poor left ventricular function, long-term exercise training may attenuate the unfavorable remodeling process and even improve both regional and global left ventricular function over time. Thus, cardiac rehabilitation exercise training in postinfarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be recommended as a useful adjunct to the existing medical therapy, not only to attain symptomatic and functional improvement but also to prevent the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and its attendant morbidity and mortality.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by grant Ricerca Corrente 1994/95 from the Ministero della Sanità, Rome, Italy, and in part by the "S. Maugeri" Foundation, Pavia, Italy. We are grateful to Andrea Giordano, PhD, and Fabio Comazzi for computer and statistical help. We also thank Rosemary Allpress for English language assistance in preparation of the manuscript.


*    Footnotes
 
1 Investigators and institutions participating in the ELVD Trial are listed in the "Appendix." Back


*    Appendix 1
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*Appendix 1
down arrowReferences
 
ELVD Study Group
The following Investigators and Institutions participated in the ELVD Trial.

Steering Committee. Pantaleo Giannuzzi, MD (Study Chairman); Amerigo Giordano, MD; Luigi Tavazzi, MD.

Coordinating Center. Fondazione "S. Maugeri," IRCCS, Divisione di Cardiologia, Istituto di Riabilitazione di Veruno: Pantaleo Giannuzzi, MD; Pier Luigi Temporelli, MD; Ugo Corrà, MD; Marinella Gattone, MD; Gian Luigi Balestroni, PhD; Anna Maria Zotti, PhD.

Participating Centers. Ospedale Geriatrico: Ancona: Luigi Quattrini, MD; Pia Francesca Tomassini, MD; Aosta: Margherita Vona, MD; Chiari: Carlo Bellet, MD; Lauro Valerio Bertoli, MD; Villa Aprica: Como: Flavio Acquistapace, MD; Guido Zattoni, MD; Rinaldo Belluschi, MD; Cosenza: Franco Plastina, MD; Franco Boncompagni, MD; Antonello Talarico, MD; Oscar Serafini, MD; Cremona: Silvia Coppetti, MD; Ospedale Careggi: Firenze: Francesco Fattirolli, MD; Mauro Di Bari, MD; Ospedale San Gerardo: Monza: Luigi Sala, MD; Franco Valagussa, MD; Riccardo Schiavina, MD; Giuseppe Trocino, MD; Felice Achilli, MD; Centro di Riabilitazione di Mozzo: Dante Mazzoleni, MD; Claudio Malinverni, MD; Passirana di Rho: Carlo Schweiger, MD; Franco Rusconi, MD; Donata Castelli, MD; Ospedale A: Locatelli, Piario: Gaetano Bianchi, MD; Alessandro Locatelli, MD; Pio Albergo Trivulzio: Milano: Salvatore Corallo, MD; Gabriella Brambilla, MD; Roberto Rabbione, MD; Rimini: Mario Marzaloni, MD; Eugenio Albani, MD; Sondalo: Riccardo Bigi, MD; Giuseppe Occhi, MD; Ospedale Maggiore: Trieste: Sabino Scardi, MD; Pier Paolo Gori, MD; Claudio Pandullo, MD.

Received February 4, 1997; revision received April 21, 1997; accepted April 28, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAppendix 1
*References
 
1. Wenger NK, Froelicher ES, Smith LK, Ades PA, Berra K, Blumenthal JA, Certo CM, Dattilo AM, Davis D, DeBusk R, Drodzda JP, Fletcher BJ, Franklin BA, Gaston H, Greenlad P, McBride PE, McGregor CGA, Oldridge NB, Piscatella JC, Rogers FJ. Cardiac Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 17. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; AHCPR publication No. 96-0672, October 1995.

2. Fletcher GF, Balady G, Steven NB, Blumenthal J, Caspersen C, Chaitman B, Epstein S, Froelicher ES, Froelicher VF, Pina IL, Pollock ML. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans: a statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996;94:857-862.[Free Full Text]

3. Specchia G, De Servi S, Scirè A, Assandri J, Berzuini C, Angoli L, La Rovere MT, Cobelli F. Interaction between exercise training and ejection fraction in predicting prognosis after a first myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;94:978-982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Oldridge N, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, Guyatt G, Grove J, Jones N. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:154-161.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Arvan S. Exercise performance of the high risk acute myocardial infarction patient after cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:197-201.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Exercise training in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Circulation. 1988;78:506-515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Tavazzi L, Ignone G. Short-term haemodynamic evolution and late follow-up of post-infarct patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing a physical training programme. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:657-665.

8. Jugdutt BI, Michorowski BL, Kappagoda CT. Exercise training after anterior Q wave myocardial infarction: importance of regional left ventricular function and topography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:362-372.[Abstract]

9. Giannuzzi P, Tavazzi L, Temporelli PL, Corrà U, Imparato A, Gattone M, Giordano A, Sala L, Schweiger C, Malinverni C. Long-term physical training and left ventricular remodeling after anterior myocardial infarction: results of the Exercise in Anterior Myocardial Infarction (EAMI) trial: EAMI Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1821-1829.[Abstract]

10. Giordano A. Comazzi F. Giannuzzi P. Automatic detection and quantification of regional wall motion, left ventricular function and remodeling using 2D echocardiographic imaging. Comput Cardiol. 1992:523-526.

11. Zotti AM, Bettinardi O, Soffiantino F, Tavazzi L, Steptoe A. Psychophysiological stress testing in postinfarction patients: psychological correlates of cardiovascular arousal and abnormal cardiac responses. Circulation. 1991;83:25-35.

12. Labbrozzi D, Carinci F, Nicolucci A, Bettinardi O, Zotti AM, Tognoni G. Psychological characteristics of patients with myocardial infarction: the GISSI-2 results. G Ital Cardiol. 1996;26:85-106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. German and Austrian Xamoterol Study Group. Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of digoxin and xamoterol in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1988;1:489-493.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Coats AJS, Adamopoulos S, Meyer TE, Conway J, Sleight P. Effects of physical training in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1990;335:63-66.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Coats AJS, Adamopoulos S, Radaelli A, McCance A, Meyer TE, Bernardi L, Solda PL, Davey P, Ormerod O, Forfar C, Conway J, Sleight P. Controlled trial of physical training in chronic heart failure: exercise performance, hemodynamics, ventilation, and autonomic function. Circulation. 1992;85:2119-2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure delays ventilatory anaerobic threshold and improves submaximal exercise performance. Circulation. 1989;79:324-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Meyer TE, Casadei B, Coats AJS, Davey PP, Adamopoulos S, Radaelli A, Conway J. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and physical training in heart failure. J Intern Med. 1991;230:407-413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Hambrecht R, Niebauer J, Fiehn E, Kalberer B, Offner B, Hauer K, Riede U, Schlierf G, Kubler W, Schuler G. Physical training in patients with stable chronic heart failure: effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and ultrastructural abnormalities of leg muscles. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1239-1249.[Abstract]

19. Belardinelli R, Georgiou D, Scocco V, Barstow TJ, Purcaro A. Low intensity exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:975-982.[Abstract]

20. Froelicher V, Jensen D, Genter F, Sullivan M, McKirnan MD, Witztum K, Scharf J, Strong ML, Ashburn W. A randomized trial of exercise training in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;252:1291-1297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Ehsani AA, Biello DR, Schultz J, Sobel BE, Holloszy JO. Improvement of left ventricular contractile function by exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1986;74:350-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Fletcher BJ, Dunbar SB, Felner JM, Jensen BE, Almon L, Cotsonis G, Fletcher GF. Exercise testing and training in physically disabled men with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:170-174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Leimbach WH, Wallin G, Victor RG, Aylward PE, Sundlof E, Mark A. Direct evidence from intraneural recordings for increased central sympathetic outflow in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1986;73:913-919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Eckberg DL, Drabinsky M, Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:877-883.

25. Francis GS. Neurohumoral mechanisms involved in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:15A-21A.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Pilati CF, Bosso FG, Maron MB. Factors involved in left ventricular dysfunction after massive sympathetic activation. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H784-H791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Goldsmitt RL, Bigger JT Jr, Steiman RC, Fleiss JL. Comparison of 24-hour parasympathetic activity in endurance-trained and untrained young men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:552-558.[Abstract]

28. Cooksey JD, Reilly P, Brown S, Bomze H, Cryer PE. Exercise training and plasma catecholamines in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:372-376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Pagani M, Somers V, Furlan R, Dell'Orto S, Conway J, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Sleight P, Malliani A. Changes in autonomic regulation induced by physical training in mild hypertension. Hypertension.. 1988;12:600-610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Clausen JP. Circulatory adjustments to dynamic exercise and effect of physical training in normal subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1976;18:456-495.

31. Hull SS Jr, Vanoli E, Adamson PB, Verrier RL, Foreman RD, Schwartz PJ. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1994;89:548-552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Gaudron P, Eilles C, Ertl G, Kochsiek K. Adaptation to cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl IV):IV-83-IV-89.

33. Rerych S, Scholz P, Sabiston D, Jones RH. Effects of exercise training on left ventricular function in normal subjects: a longitudinal study by radionuclide angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:244-301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Niebauer J, Cooke JP. Cardiovascular effects of exercise: role of endothelial shear stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1652-1660.[Abstract]

35. Myers J, Ahnve S, Froelicher V, Livington M, Jensen D, Abramson I, Sullivan M, Mortara D. A randomized trial of the effects of 1 year of exercise training on computer-measured ST segment displacement in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:1094-1102.[Abstract]

36. Schuler G, Hambrecht R, Schlierf G, Grunze M, Methfessel S, Hauer K, Kubler W. Myocardial perfusion and regression of coronary artery disease in patients on a regimen of intensive physical exercise and low fat diet. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:34-42.[Abstract]

37. Galli M, Marcassa C, Bolli R, Giannuzzi P, Temporelli PL, Silva P, Imparato A, Giubbini R, Giordano A, Tavazzi L. Spontaneous delayed recovery of perfusion and contraction after the first five weeks following anterior infarction: evidence for the presence of hibernating myocardium in the infarcted area. Circulation. 1994;90:1386-1396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Giannuzzi P, Marcassa C, Temporelli PL, Galli M, Corrà U, Imparato A, Silva P, Gattone M, Campini R, Giordano A, Tavazzi L. Residual exertional ischemia and unfavourable left ventricular remodeling in patients with systolic dysfunction after anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1539-1546.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Y. A. Mou, C. Reboul, L. Andre, A. Lacampagne, and O. Cazorla
Late exercise training improves non-uniformity of transmural myocardial function in rats with ischaemic heart failure
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2009; 81(3): 555 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. K. Wenger
Current Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1619 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
C. R. Pischke, G. Weidner, M. Elliott-Eller, and D. Ornish
Lifestyle changes and clinical profile in coronary heart disease patients with an ejection fraction of <=40% or >40% in the Multicenter Lifestyle Demonstration Project
Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 928 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. L. Schultz, J. G. Swallow, R. P. Waters, J. A. Kuzman, R. A. Redetzke, S. Said, G. M. de Escobar, and A. M. Gerdes
Effects of Excessive Long-Term Exercise on Cardiac Function and Myocyte Remodeling in Hypertensive Heart Failure Rats
Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 410 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. C. de Waard, J. van der Velden, V. Bito, S. Ozdemir, L. Biesmans, N. M. Boontje, D. H.W. Dekkers, K. Schoonderwoerd, H. C.H. Schuurbiers, R. d. Crom, et al.
Early Exercise Training Normalizes Myofilament Function and Attenuates Left Ventricular Pump Dysfunction in Mice With a Large Myocardial Infarction
Circ. Res., April 13, 2007; 100(7): 1079 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
B. A.F. van Tol, R. J. Huijsmans, D. W. Kroon, M. Schothorst, and G. Kwakkel
Effects of exercise training on cardiac performance, exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis
Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2006; 8(8): 841 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
F. Giallauria, R. Lucci, A. De Lorenzo, M. D'Agostino, D. Del Forno, and C. Vigorito
Favourable effects of exercise training on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels in elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction
Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. S.F. Yu, D. R. Thompson, and D. T.F. Lee
Disease management programmes for older people with heart failure: crucial characteristics which improve post-discharge outcomes
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 596 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. M. Conraads, P. Beckers, J. Vaes, M. Martin, V. Van Hoof, C. De Maeyer, N. Possemiers, F. L. Wuyts, and C. J. Vrints
Combined endurance/resistance training reduces NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2004; 25(20): 1797 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Exercise training meta-analysis of trials in patients with chronic heart failure (ExTraMATCH)
BMJ, January 24, 2004; 328(7433): 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Giannuzzi, P. L. Temporelli, U. Corra, and L. Tavazzi
Antiremodeling Effect of Long-Term Exercise Training in Patients With Stable Chronic Heart Failure: Results of the Exercise in Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Chronic Heart Failure (ELVD-CHF) Trial
Circulation, August 5, 2003; 108(5): 554 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. J. Stewart, D. Badenhop, P. H. Brubaker, S. J. Keteyian, and M. King
Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Percutaneous Revascularization, Heart Transplant, Heart Valve Surgery, and for Chronic Heart Failure
Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 2104 - 2111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. L. Pina, C. S. Apstein, G. J. Balady, R. Belardinelli, B. R. Chaitman, B. D. Duscha, B. J. Fletcher, J. L. Fleg, J. N. Myers, and M. J. Sullivan
Exercise and Heart Failure: A Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention
Circulation, March 4, 2003; 107(8): 1210 - 1225.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
G. Malfatto, G. Branzi, B. Riva, L. Sala, G. Leonetti, and M. Facchini
Recovery of cardiac autonomic responsiveness with low-intensity physical training in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2002; 4(2): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Denollet and D. L. Brutsaert
Reducing Emotional Distress Improves Prognosis in Coronary Heart Disease: 9-Year Mortality in a Clinical Trial of Rehabilitation
Circulation, October 23, 2001; 104(17): 2018 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L TAVAZZI and P GIANNUZZI
Physical training as a therapeutic measure in chronic heart failure: time for recommendations
Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 7 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Recommendations for exercise training in chronic heart failure patients
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2001; 22(2): 125 - 135.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. T. Spencer, K. Collins, C. Korcarz, R. Fentzke, R. M. Lang, and J. M. Leiden
Effects of exercise training on LV performance and mortality in a murine model of dilated cardiomyopathy
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2000; 279(1): H210 - H215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Hambrecht, S. Gielen, A. Linke, E. Fiehn, J. Yu, C. Walther, N. Schoene, and G. Schuler
Effects of Exercise Training on Left Ventricular Function and Peripheral Resistance in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, June 21, 2000; 283(23): 3095 - 3101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Jain, R. Liao, S. Ngoy, P. Whittaker, C. S. Apstein, and F. R. Eberli
Angiotensin II receptor blockade attenuates the deleterious effects of exercise training on post-MI ventricular remodelling in rats
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2000; 46(1): 66 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. Humphrey and R. Arena
Surgical Innovations for Chronic Heart Failure in the Context of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 61 - 69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. J. S. Coats
Exercise Training for Heart Failure : Coming of Age
Circulation, March 9, 1999; 99(9): 1138 - 1140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Hambrecht, E. Fiehn, C. Weigl, S. Gielen, C. Hamann, R. Kaiser, J. Yu, V. Adams, J. Niebauer, and G. Schuler
Regular Physical Exercise Corrects Endothelial Dysfunction and Improves Exercise Capacity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, December 15, 1998; 98(24): 2709 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Tenenbaum, J. Shemesh, P. Giannuzzi, and U. Corra
Attenuation of Unfavorable Sympathetic Hyperactivity Induced by Long-Term Physical Training in Postinfarction Patients: Fact or Speculation? • Response
Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 1042 - 1043.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannuzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannuzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Group, f. t. E. S.