(Circulation. 1997;96:1853-1858.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Hippokration Hospital, Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Greece.
Correspondence to Christodoulos Stefanadis, MD, FESC, FACC, 9 Tepeleniou St, 15452 Paleo Psychico, Athens, Greece.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results The aortic pressure-diameter relation was obtained before and after diltiazem administration in 15 hypertensives and 15 control normotensives. Instantaneous diameter of the thoracic aorta was acquired with a high-fidelity intravascular catheter developed in our institution and previously validated. Instantaneous aortic pressure was measured simultaneously and at the same aortic level with a catheter-tip micromanometer. Energy loss due to the viscosity of aortic wall was measured from the area of the loop. Aortic distensibility was calculated using the formula 2x(pulsatile change in aortic diameter)/([diastolic aortic diameter]x[aortic pulse pressure]). At baseline, aortic distensibility was lower and energy loss was greater in hypertensives than in normotensives (distensibility: 1.4±0.3 versus 3.5±0.7 cm2 · dyne-1 · 10-6, respectively, P<.001; energy loss: 14.1±3.3 versus 8.2±2.2 mm · mm Hg, respectively, P<.001). After diltiazem administration, aortic distensibility was increased, whereas energy loss was decreased in both hypertensives (peak response: distensibility, 2.0±0.4 cm2 · dyne-1 · 10-6, P<.001; energy loss, 9.3±1.6 mm · mm Hg, P<.001) and normotensives (peak response: distensibility, 5.2±0.5 cm2 · dyne-1 · 10-6, P<.001; energy loss, 5.0±1.2 mm · mm Hg, P<.001).
Conclusions Aortic elastic properties are compromised and energy loss due to aortic wall viscosity is increased in hypertensives compared with normotensives. Function of the aorta is improved in both hypertensive and normotensive subjects after the administration of diltiazem.
Key Words: aorta diltiazem hypertension elasticity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Systemic hypertension, a common disorder with potentially serious complications, exerts further ill effects through structural and functional modifications of the arterial wall.6 7 Previous studies using different techniques have shown that aortic elastic properties are compromised in patients with arterial hypertension.8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Measurement of pulse wave velocity has been extensively used,9 10 11 providing only indirect estimations of the elastic properties of the aorta. Noninvasive methods11 12 13 14 using formulas involving pulsatile change in aortic dimensions and pulse pressure (the former is measured with echocardiography or nuclear magnetic resonance and the latter is measured with conventional sphygmomanometer or noninvasive pressure recorders) determine the elastic properties of the aorta at a given level; however, they do not provide insights into the mechanism, whether active or passive, involved in the alterations of the elastic properties of the aorta. Such information is provided with aortic pressure-diameter relation. Recently, we described a new method to obtain aortic pressure-diameter relation in conscious humans.15 16 17 With this method, aortic diameters were acquired with a high-fidelity intravascular catheter developed in our institution that incorporates an ultrasonic displacement meter at its distal end. Aortic pressures were acquired simultaneously and at the same aortic level with a catheter-tip micromanometer.
Previous studies by us18 and others19 have shown that nifedipine administration increases the distensibility of the aorta. Moreover, studies in experimental animals have shown that diltiazem improves aortic elastic properties.20 The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of diltiazem, a calcium channel antagonist widely used in the treatment of arterial hypertension, on aortic performance in hypertensive and normotensive subjects using a high-fidelity method for the determination of pressure-diameter relation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurement of Aortic Diameter and Pressure
Instantaneous aortic diameters and pressures were recorded
simultaneously and at the same point of the aorta. This
technique has been recently described in detail.15 16 17
Diameter was measured in the proximal descending aorta with a Y-shaped
intravascular catheter that was developed in our institution and
involves the use of sonometry for the measurement of diameters. At each
arm of the catheter, a piezoelectric crystal (5 MHz in frequency,
1 mm; Crystal Biotech) is attached. The technical characteristics
of the device include (1) resolution for assessment of changes in
diameter of 10 µm, (2) flat (±5%) frequency response in
testing up to 40 Hz, (3) no measurable phase lag between forced
oscillations of the device and the signal in the frequency
response range, and (4) minimal loading on the aortic wall (0.45
g/arm when the distance between the arms is 1 cm).
Aortic pressures were recorded with a catheter-tip micromanometer (model SPC-330; Millar Instruments). The transducer was calibrated electronically against mercury at the beginning of each study.
Study Protocol
The subjects were studied during a 1-day hospitalization.
Studies were performed at 9 AM under a controlled room
temperature of 20±1°C. For patients in the hypertensive group, study
of aortic function was performed on a separate
catheterization session within 6 months after the
diagnostic catheterization. For patients in
the normotensive group, diagnostic cardiac
catheterization and study of aortic function were
performed in the same catheterization session. Before
insertion of the diameter device and pressure
micromanometer, all patients received an
intravenous bolus injection of heparin (100 U/kg), and
during the procedure, continuous infusion of heparin was administered
to maintain activated clotting time of >300 seconds.
For insertion of the diameter device, a long (50-cm) 8F guiding sheath was introduced through a 9F introducer placed in the right femoral artery and positioned to the level of the proximal descending aorta under fluoroscopic observation. The catheter (with the wires collapsed) was then advanced into the guiding sheath. Once the catheter tip was in position, the guiding sheath was withdrawn to completely expose the Y-shaped end of the catheter, which allowed the arms to spread apart until they touched the aortic wall and freely followed its movements during the cardiac cycle. The catheter position was frequently checked by fluoroscopy throughout the study to document its stability.
The catheter-tip micromanometer (3F) was inserted through a 5F introductory sheath punctured into the left femoral artery and advanced minimally below the exact level of the pair of crystals.
Baseline measurements were obtained 30 minutes after the last infusion of contrast medium. After baseline measurements, diltiazem was administered intravenously through a peripheral line in a bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg over a period of 2 minutes. Hemodynamic and ECG measurements were continuously monitored and recorded at baseline, at the end of diltiazem administration (time 0), and repeatedly thereafter (minutes 1 through 10, 15, and 20).
Data Acquisition
Throughout the study, ECG, aortic diameter, and aortic pressure
signals collected with a VF-1 mainframe fitted with appropriate modules
for acquisition of data were simultaneously displayed in
real-time mode on a PC (Pentium 100) using a multichannel 12-bit
analog-to-digital converter (Data Translation Inc) and commercially
available data acquisition software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech). The
digitized data were stored and later processed with the use of
commercially available software (Microsoft Excel for Windows). Signals
were digitized every 5 msec. For aortic pressure and diameter values
and subsequent calculations of derivative parameters,
analyses were performed on 10 consecutive cycles, and the
results were averaged.
Indexes of Aortic Elastic Properties
Aortic strain was calculated as the following ratio: Aortic
Strain=(Systolic-Diastolic Aortic
Diameter)/Diastolic Aortic Diameter.
Aortic cross-sectional distensibility was calculated as the following18 21 22 23 : Aortic Distensibility=2x(Systolic-Diastolic Aortic Diameter)/([Diastolic Aortic Diameter]x[Aortic Pulse Pressure]).
Aortic pressure-diameter relation15 16 17 was obtained by
plotting the pressure versus diameter of digitized data with
commercially available computer software (Excel for Windows; Fig 1
). To characterize the pressure-diameter
relation and determine the aortic loop orientation, the slope and
intercept of the linear regression line of pressure versus diameter
were calculated. Moreover, aortic pressure-diameter data obtained
during the ventricular ejection, which corresponds to the
ascending limb of the loop, were used for the calculation of aortic
stiffness constant. The rate of aortic blood pressure changes (dP/dt)
was instantaneously calculated and simultaneously
recorded with the high-fidelity pressure. Pressure and diameter
data during the ascending limb of the loop, starting when the dP/dt
curve reached zero baseline (at the beginning of ascending limb of the
loop) and ending at peak +dP/dt, were fitted to the exponential
function:
P=bxea ·D, where P is the instantaneous aortic pressure and
D is the aortic diameter. The least-squares method was used for
calculation of a and b, where a is the
elastic aortic stiffness constant (mm-1),
which determines the slope of the exponential curve, and b
is the elastic constant (mm Hg; Fig 2
).
|
|
Aortic energy loss due to the viscosity of the aortic wall was represented by the area (mm · mm Hg) within the aortic loop.
Wave reflections were evaluated by measuring augmentation index2 24 defined as the ratio of (Pressure From Inflection Point to Late Systolic Peak)/(Pulse Pressure). Beginning of pressure wave upstroke, inflection point (Pi), and late systolic peak (Ppk) were defined by using fourth derivative of pressure.24
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SD. For comparisons of
patient characteristics between the two groups, the unpaired
t test was used. Changes during the study within each group
were evaluated using ANOVA. Values of peak response to diltiazem
administration were compared with baseline using the paired
t test. Qualitative data were compared with use of the
2 test. Correlations were evaluated with the
Pearson's coefficient of correlation. A value of P<.05 was
considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Aortic Pressures and Diameters
Systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures
were significantly higher in the hypertensive group.
End-systolic aortic diameter did not differ, whereas
end-diastolic diameter was greater and strain was lower in
hypertensives.
Aortic Function
Distensibility was lower in the hypertensive subjects. The
clockwise pressure-diameter loops of hypertensive patients were shifted
upward and rightward, and they had a steeper slope, as well as a lower
intercept indicating reduced elasticity compared with controls (Fig 1
).
The pressure-diameter data fitted excellently to the
monoexponential function
P=bxea · D,
(r=.97 to .99, P<.001), and the aortic stiffness
constant a was higher in hypertensives than in
normotensives. Moreover, energy loss was greater in hypertensives than
in normotensives.
Wave Reflection
Augmentation index was significantly lower in the normotensive
group.
Response to Diltiazem Administration
Diltiazem administration did not significantly change the heart
rate in both groups. Peak response to diltiazem administration
concerning all measured parameters, as well as calculated
aortic function indexes and augmentation index, occurred during the
first minute after drug infusion completion in both groups (Table 2
and
Fig 3
).
|
|
Aortic Pressures and Diameters
Systolic and diastolic aortic pressures were
decreased in both hypertensives and controls (baseline versus peak,
P<.001; ANOVA, P<.001 for all, Fig 3
).
Moreover, pulse pressure decreased both in hypertensives (baseline
versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P=NS) and
normotensives (baseline versus peak, P<.005; ANOVA,
P=NS). Diameters remained unchanged in the hypertensive
group, whereas systolic diameter increased (baseline versus
peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.05) and
diastolic diameter decreased (baseline versus peak,
P<.05; ANOVA, P=NS) in the normotensive
group.
Aortic Function
Aortic strain increased both in hypertensives (baseline versus
peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.005) and normotensives
(baseline versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.001).
Diltiazem administration resulted in an improvement of
pressure-diameter relationderived elasticity indexes that was
associated with a downward and rightward shift of the pressure-diameter
loops of both hypertensive patients and controls (Fig 2
).
Distensibility increased significantly in both groups (baseline versus
peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.001 for both, Fig 3
).
Slope of the loop became less steep in both hypertensives (baseline
versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.005) and
normotensives (baseline versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA,
P<.01), stiffness constant decreased in both hypertensives
(baseline versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.005,
Fig 3
) and normotensives (baseline versus peak, P<.005;
ANOVA, P=NS, Fig 3
), and intercept increased in both
hypertensives (baseline versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA,
P<.001) and normotensives (baseline versus peak,
P<.001; ANOVA, P<.01). Shifting of the
pressure-diameter loops to another hypothetical line of elasticity (see
"Discussion") represents an active mechanism of aortic
elastic properties improvement.15 16 17 The energy loss (area
of loop) was significantly reduced in both groups (baseline versus
peak, P<.001; ANOVA, P<.001 for both).
Wave Reflection
Augmentation index decreased significantly in both hypertensives
(baseline versus peak, P<.005; ANOVA, P=NS) and
normotensives (baseline versus peak, P<.001; ANOVA,
P<.05) indicating reduced wave reflection in the
periphery.
Correlation Between Aortic Distensibility and Aortic Stiffness
Constant
A very good inverse correlation (Fig 4
) was found between distensibility and
aortic stiffness constant in normal subjects and hypertensives both
before (r=-.77 and r=-.86, respectively;
P<.001 for both groups) and after (r=-.66 and
r=-.70, respectively; P<.01 for both groups)
diltiazem administration. An excellent inverse correlation was also
found between distensibility and aortic stiffness constant when data
from all patients, before and after diltiazem, were plotted altogether
(r=-.96, P<.001).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methodological Considerations
The method used in the present study provides an accurate
determination of pressure-diameter relation. The high-fidelity
diameter-measuring device has been validated in experimental and
clinical studies and proved to be accurate and safe for the measurement
of aortic diameter.15 16 Aortic pressure was measured by a
catheter-tip micromanometer, which allows excellent
reproduction of pressure waveforms. Moreover, aortic pressure
was measured simultaneously with aortic diameter and, at
the same point, two features mandatory for the reliable determination
of pressure-diameter relation.15
Analysis of the pressure-diameter loop provides a valuable insight into aortic mechanics. First, indexes such as distensibility and slope of the pressure-diameter loop may be calculated. Moreover, in the present study, aortic stiffness constant was measured from pressure and diameter data of the aortic filling phase through the use of a simple monoexponential curve fit with high correlation coefficients, and, as was demonstrated, this index of aortic elasticity correlates well with established indexes such as aortic distensibility. Second, study of the pressure-diameter relation helps distinguish between active and passive changes in aortic elastic properties. The pressure-diameter relation for a given subject has a sigmoid configuration. Movement of the pressure-diameter loop along this hypothetical sigmoid line suggests changes of the elastic properties of the aorta due to changes in aortic pressure alone. In contrast, shifting of the pressure diameter loop to the right or left implies essential modification of the intrinsic elastic properties of the aorta due to nonpassive factors.15 16 17 Third, study of the pressure-diameter loop provides insights into aortic energetics. In specific, the area within the loop represents the energy dissipated due to the viscosity of the aortic wall.
Aortic Function in Hypertensive Patients
The results of the present study confirmed that aortic elastic
properties are compromised in essential hypertension.8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Several studies25 26 27 suggested that in hypertension, the
aorta exposed to increased intraluminal pressure undergoes an increase
in mural thickness. Moreover, changes in the structural components of
the arterial wall, including a fall in the ratio of elastin
to collagen, may account for stiffening of the aorta.28 In
addition, increased smooth muscle tension is possible contributor to
aortic wall stiffening in hypertension. Hypertension-induced
endothelial cell dysfunction may also contribute to
alterations of the arterial wall tone, most likely through
impairment of nitric oxidemediated vascular smooth muscle
relaxation.29 In advanced stages of the disease, a further
factor that reduces arterial compliance is deposition of
calcium.30
Response to Diltiazem Administration
We demonstrated that aortic function is improved after the
administration of diltiazem to both hypertensives and normotensives.
This finding is in accordance with previous observations in
experimental animals.20 Two mechanisms may be involved in
these changes. First, the improvement in aortic elasticity might be
considered a passive phenomenon due to the lowering of the aortic
pressure. Second, an active mechanism may contribute in the changes
observed. Indeed, the pressure-diameter loop was shifted downward after
diltiazem administration along a different hypothetical sigmoid line of
elasticity. This movement suggests active changes of the elastic
properties of the aorta (changes of the intrinsic elastic properties).
Such an active effect of diltiazem could be due to a direct relaxation
of the smooth muscle of the aorta.7 31 32 Moreover,
because reduced vasa vasorum flow unfavorably affects aortic elastic
properties,33 34 an increase in the vasodilatory capacity
of the vasa vasorum of the aortic wall, which is decreased in chronic
hypertension,35 may account for the active improvement in
aortic elastic properties with the drug. Hypothetically,
endothelial damage could perpetuate or even initiate
hypertension. The proposed specific role of the vascular
endothelium in producing vasoconstrictory endothelin
and vasodilatory nitric oxide and the delineation of the
endothelial site of action of calcium
antagonists lead to the concept that these agents could
interrupt a hypertensive vicious-cycle mechanism. Moreover, viscous
energy loss was reduced in both groups, a factor that also implies
modification of the intrinsic elastic properties of the aortic
wall.
As indicated by the reduction in the augmentation index, diltiazem resulted in a decrease in peripheral resistance. Thus, this additional site of action may contribute to a beneficial effect of the drug on left ventricular afterload.
Specific Comments
The possible effect of constant contact by the arms on smooth
muscle tone was previously investigated.15 It has been
proved that there is no smooth muscle response to the prolonged contact
of the aortic wall by the arms of the device.
A limiting factor of the technique is its invasive nature. However, our method is best suited to physiological investigations in which detection of subtle changes of the elastic properties of the aorta are sought or reliable determination of the aortic pressure-diameter relation is desired. Furthermore, in neither this study nor previous studies15 16 17 were any complications encountered, thus confirming the safety of the technique.
Aortic distensibility is affected in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors.6 7 However, in our study population, the two groups had the same distribution of age, smoking, or cholesterol levels, thus overcoming a possible confusing effect of these factors on aortic elastic properties and their modification with diltiazem.
Conclusions
The results of the present study confirmed that elastic
properties of the aorta are deteriorated in hypertensive patients
compared with normotensive subjects and demonstrated that energy loss
due to aortic wall viscosity was increased in the first group.
Moreover, it was shown that diltiazem administration produces an acute
improvement in the elastic properties of the aorta and a decrease in
aortic energy loss in both groups. These effects may contribute the
beneficial effects of diltiazem in the treatment of
arterial hypertension.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 12, 1996; revision received April 23, 1997; accepted May 1, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C Vlachopoulos, K Aznaouridis, and C Stefanadis Clinical appraisal of arterial stiffness: the Argonauts in front of the Golden Fleece Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1544 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Armentano, J. G. Barra, D. B. Santana, F. M. Pessana, S. Graf, D. Craiem, L. M. Brandani, H. P. Baglivo, and R. A. Sanchez Smart Damping Modulation of Carotid Wall Energetics in Human Hypertension: Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 384 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dernellis and M. Panaretou Aortic Stiffness Is an Independent Predictor of Progression to Hypertension in Nonhypertensive Subjects Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Durier, C. Fassot, S. Laurent, P. Boutouyrie, J.-P. Couetil, E. Fine, P. Lacolley, V. J. Dzau, and R. E. Pratt Physiological Genomics of Human Arteries: Quantitative Relationship Between Gene Expression and Arterial Stiffness Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1845 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Oliver and D. J. Webb Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 554 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hager, H. Kaemmerer, U. Rapp-Bernhardt, S. Blucher, K. Rapp, T. M. Bernhardt, M. Galanski, and J. Hess Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1060 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vlachopoulos, K. Hirata, and M. F. O'Rourke Pressure-Altering Agents Affect Central Aortic Pressures More Than Is Apparent From Upper Limb Measurements in Hypertensive Patients: The Role of Arterial Wave Reflections Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1456 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Cholley, R. M. Lang, C. E. Korcarz, and S. G. Shroff Smooth muscle relaxation and local hydraulic impedance properties of the aorta J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2001; 90(6): 2427 - 2438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stefanadis, J. Dernellis, E. Tsiamis, L. Diamantopoulos, A. Michaelides, and P. Toutouzas Assessment of Aortic Line of Elasticity Using Polynomial Regression Analysis Circulation, April 18, 2000; 101(15): 1819 - 1825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Stefanadis, J Dernellis, E Tsiamis, C Stratos, L Diamantopoulos, A Michaelides, and P Toutouzas Aortic stiffness as a risk factor for recurrent acute coronary events in patients with ischaemic heart disease Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2000; 21(5): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stefanadis, E. Tsiamis, J. Dernellis, and P. Toutouzas Effect of estrogen on aortic function in postmenopausal women Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H658 - H662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stefanadis, J. Dernellis, E. Tsiamis, C. Stratos, I. Kallikazaros, and P. Toutouzas AORTIC FUNCTION IN PATIENTS DURING INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING DETERMINED BY THE PRESSURE-DIAMETER RELATION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 1052 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Bank and D. R. Kaiser Smooth Muscle Relaxation : Effects on Arterial Compliance, Distensibility, Elastic Modulus, and Pulse Wave Velocity Hypertension, August 1, 1998; 32(2): 356 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stefanadis, J. Dernellis, M. Vavuranakis, E. Tsiamis, C. Vlachopoulos, Konstantinos Toutouzas, L. Diamandopoulos, C. Pitsavos, and P. Toutouzas Effects of ventricular pacing-induced tachycardia on aortic mechanics in man Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 1998; 39(2): 506 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cattaruzza, I. Eberhardt, and M. Hecker Mechanosensitive Transcription Factors Involved in Endothelin B Receptor Expression J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2001; 276(40): 36999 - 37003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |