Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:2247-2253

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isobe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiguchi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isobe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiguchi, M.

(Circulation. 1997;96:2247-2253.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Regulation by Differential Development of Th1 and Th2 Cells in Peripheral Tolerance to Cardiac Allograft Induced by Blocking ICAM-1/LFA-1 Adhesion

Mitsuaki Isobe, MD; Jun-ichi Suzuki, MD; Satoshi Yamazaki, MD; Yoshikazu Yazaki, MD; Shiro Horie, MD; Yoshio Okubo, MD; Koji Maemura, MD; Yoshio Yazaki, MD; ; Morie Sekiguchi, MD

From the First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine (M.I., J.S., S.Y., Yoshikazu Yazaki, S.H., Y.O., M.S.), and The Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo (K.M., Yoshio Yazaki), Japan.

Correspondence to Mitsuaki Isobe, MD, The First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390 Japan. E-mail isobemi{at}gipac.shinshu-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Specific immune tolerance to cardiac allografts is induced by anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1 MAbs. Although the expression of the Th1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} is shown to increase in association with acute rejection, the roles of cytokines in the induction of peripheral tolerance by anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1 MAbs are not yet known.

Methods and Results BALB/c hearts were transplanted into C3H/He mice. The MAbs to ICAM-1 and LFA-1 were injected for 3 days after transplantation in some recipients, and others were treated with FK506. IL-2 concentration in the supernatant of splenocytes from MAb-treated mice that were mix-cultured with donor splenocytes was lower than in normal controls. The expression of Th1 cytokines, detected by Northern blot assay, was enhanced in grafts or spleens of nontreated mice, whereas Th2 cytokines were expressed in the spleens of MAb-treated mice. No cytokine expression was enhanced in mice treated with FK506. Also, the induction of tolerance was prevented by the administration of rIL-2 in vivo in 5 of 7 mice, which were rendered tolerant.

Conclusions These data provide evidence that impairment of IL-2 production is critically involved in this tolerance induction and suggest that predominance of Th2 over Th1 cells is essential for tolerance induction by antiadhesion therapy.


Key Words: cytokines • interleukins • glycoproteins • immunology • transplantation • immune system • rejection


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Antigen-specific transplantation tolerance induction is one of the major goals of transplantation immunology. It has been reported that specific tolerance to murine cardiac allografts can be induced by a short-term administration of MAbs to ICAM-1 and LFA-1.1 2 The primary cardiac allografts as well as the second skin graft from the donor strain are accepted indefinitely. Immune reactions to other antigens remain unaffected, as demonstrated by normal rejection of skin from third-party strains. However, the molecular mechanism of this unique tolerance is not yet understood. Experiments in vitro showed that incomplete signaling derived from a costimulatory receptor in the presence of signals from T-cell receptors causes alteration in IL-2 production, which leads to clonal inactivation of T cells.3 It is possible that this mechanism is involved in the transplantation tolerance induced by blocking ICAM-1/LFA-1 adhesion, because LFA-1 is shown to produce costimulatory signals that lead to T-cell activation.4

Development of immature helper (Th0) cells into mature Th1 cells is an important factor in determining the kinetics of cytokine production that lead to acute immunological rejection.5 6 7 Th1 cells produce IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}, which primarily mediate cellular immunity and have been shown to be associated with mouse islet allograft rejection.8 In contrast, Th2 cells produce IL-4 and IL-10, which promote antibody responses, and have been implicated in allograft tolerance.9 10 11 12 Suppression of Th1 cytokines by the Th2 cells may be related to the induction of tolerance, because Th1 cells and Th2 cells mutually suppress each other's subsets. However, a lack of preferential Th1/Th2 cytokine gene expression in a model of transplantation tolerance by anti–{alpha} T-cell receptor MAb has been reported.13 The absence of differences in Th1 or Th2 expression in spontaneously accepting versus rejecting liver transplant recipients is also demonstrated.14 Furthermore, the IL-2 gene is shown to be induced in both tolerant and untreated animals to similar levels in a model of donor-specific presensitization to rat renal allografts.15 It is therefore likely that preferential use of cytokines is different depending on the models and organs transplanted.

To clarify the mechanism of tolerance induction through anti–ICAM-1/LFA-1 therapy, we characterized the cytokine profile using quantitative and semiquantitative analysis of cytokine gene expression, immunohistochemistry, and lymphocyte culture as well as in vivo studies. We found that production and transcription of Th2 cytokines were detected in the mice treated with the MAbs, whereas Th1 cytokines were suppressed. Also, exogenously administered rIL-2 prevented the induction of tolerance to cardiac allografts in the majority of the mice. A significant difference was observed in cytokine profiles in allografted mice treated with FK506.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1 MAbs
The MAbs for tolerance induction used in this study, KBA (IgG2a)16 and YN1/1.7 (IgG2b),17 are rat MAbs to mouse CD11a ({alpha}-chain of LFA-1) and ICAM-1, respectively.1 These MAbs were kindly provided by Prof Ko Okumura, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan. Ascites produced in nude mice was applied to a protein-G column for one-step purification as described before.18

Heterotopic Cardiac Transplantation and Induction of Tolerance
Male BALB/c (H-2d) and C3H/He (H-2k) mice (4 to 6 weeks old, 20 to 25 g) were obtained from Japan Charles River Laboratories (Tokyo). Donor hearts were heterotopically transplanted into recipient mice by microsurgical technique as described earlier.18 19 C3H/He or BALB/c hearts were transplanted into C3H/He recipients as isograft controls or as allografts, respectively. Recipient mice were treated with daily doses of 50 µg each of anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1 MAbs for 3 consecutive days starting immediately after the allograft transplantation.1 FK506 (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co) was injected at a dose of 1 mg/kg IM daily in 15 allograft recipients that did not receive MAb injection. This treatment was started on the day of surgery and continued until they were killed. Isografts (n=9), allografts from nontreated mice (n=15), allografts from MAb-treated mice (n=21), and allografts from FK506-treated mice (n=15) were removed at days 1 to 11.

Mixed Leukocyte Culture and Determination of IL-2 Concentration
C3H/He recipients transplanted with BALB/c hearts were treated with 50 µg each of KBA and YN1/1.7 for the first 3 days after transplantation. Spleen cells from the recipients were washed three times after lysis of red blood cells in 175 mmol/L ammonium chloride. These splenocytes were mix-cultured for 4 days with irradiated splenocytes of BALB/c mice in a 96-well culture plate (model 3072, Falcon). Culture medium was RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS and 1% gentamicin. Four sets of triplicated assay plates were prepared. Culture supernatant collected four times at 24-hour intervals was subjected to ELISA to determine IL-2 concentration (Intertest-2X, Genzyme). Experiments were repeated three times, and data are indicated as the mean±SD of three independent experiments.

Immunohistochemistry
Cardiac allografts and spleens were removed and kept frozen. Serial sections (6 to 8 µm) were cut and dipped in cold acetone for 10 minutes. The sections were rehydrated in PBS and incubated with 5% normal goat serum to avoid nonspecific reaction. They were incubated with biotinylated primary antibodies against IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 (PharMingen) for 12 hours at 4°C. Antibody-biotin conjugate was detected with an avidin-biotin–horseradish peroxidase complex (Nichirei) used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enzyme activity was detected with diaminobenzidine (0.5 mg/mL) with 0.05% NiCl in 50 mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.5.20

The number of positive cells per 10 microscopic fields under x100 magnification was counted in each section by two independent observers. Four animals in each group were killed for this experiment. The total number of IFN-{gamma}– and IL-2–producing cells was considered as being the number of Th1 cells and that of IL-4– and IL-10–producing cells as Th2 cells. The entire tissue section was examined to exclude any bias relating to a nonrandom distribution of positive cells. Standard hematoxylin-eosin stain was also performed.

RT-PCR
Total mRNA (5 µg in 5 µL DEPC-H2O) was reverse transcribed in a 25-µL reaction volume containing buffer (mmol/L: Tris-HCl 10 [pH 8.3], KCl 50, MgCl2 1.5), 2 mmol/L DTT, 1.2 µg of oligo (dT) primer, 50 U RNase inhibitor, and 200 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Perkin-Elmer) for 15 minutes at 42°C. cDNA (5 µL) was analyzed in a 50-µL reaction containing buffer (as above), 0.2 mmol/L (each) dNTPs, 0.4 µmol/L primers, and 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer). Samples were amplified with the following parameters: 94°C, 1 minute; 55°C to 60°C, 2 minutes; 72°C, 1 minute; and 25 to 40 cycles. Primers for IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 were synthesized as described.21 As a control for the presence of PCR-detectable cDNA, cDNA preparations were analyzed for GAPDH. Products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels followed by ethidium bromide staining.

Northern Blot Assay
Total RNA was prepared with Isogen (Wako Pure Chemicals). Cytokine transcripts were evaluated as follows: total RNA from heart grafts and spleens was size-fractionated in a 1.5% agarose gel (0.37 mol/L formaldehyde) and blotted to nylon membranes (Hybond-N+, Amersham). The mouse cDNA probes (for IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma}) were kindly provided by Prof Takashi Yokota, University of Tokyo, Japan. The membranes were prehybridized and hybridized overnight at 42°C (50% deionized formamide, 5xSSC, and 1xPE [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate, 1% SDS, 0.2% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.2% Ficoll, and 5 mmol/L EDTA]), 150 µg/mL denatured salmon sperm DNA with [32P]dCTP and washed twice in 2xSSC/0.1% SDS for 5 minutes at 22°C. The filters were exposed to Kodak X-Omat AR film. Radioactivity was quantified by an image analyzer system (BAS2000, Fuji). The ratio of the radioactivity of the mRNA signal for cytokines to background radioactivity was calculated.

Administration of rIL-2
Mice treated with the MAbs were injected with rIL-2 (kindly provided by Shionogi Pharmaceutical Co), dissolved in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, and administered by osmotic pumps (model 1007D, Alzet) at a constant rate for 7 days. rIL-2 was administered during the course of MAb treatment beginning on the day of transplantation or on day 50 after tolerance induction. The graft beat was checked daily by palpation by two independent observers. The complete loss of graft beat was interpreted as rejection. The procedure was verified by histochemical examination of hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections.

Statistics
Comparison of survival rates was performed by a Kaplan-Meier survival model. A value of P>.05 was considered nonsignificant in comparisons between multiple groups of data. All data were expressed as the mean±SD.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Graft Survival
The beat of the allografts that received no immunosuppressive treatment decreased daily, and all grafts stopped beating by day 9. However, the isografts and allografts with MAbs or FK506 treatment kept beating as long as observation continued.

IL-2 Production
Serial determinations of IL-2 concentration in the supernatant of mixed lymphocyte culture are shown in Fig 1Down. Splenocytes taken from mice treated with MAbs responded to donor-strain allostimulation, and IL-2 concentration peaked at 72 hours (229±38 pg/mL, n=3); however, the concentration was significantly lower than that of normal mice (517±99 pg/mL, n=3, P<.05). In contrast, IL-2 in the supernatant of splenocytes from mice with rejecting cardiac allografts peaked at {approx}24 to 48 hours and then decreased gradually (72 hours, 89±64 pg/mL). The chronological pattern of IL-2 production in vitro in MAb-treated mice at 9 days and 55 days was similar.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Chronological course of IL-2 concentration in supernatant of mixed leukocyte culture. Level of IL-2 concentration in MAb-treated mice was lower than in normal mice. Experiment was repeated three times; mean±SD of three experiments is shown. *P<.05 vs tolerance 9 days and P<.01 vs tolerance 55 days.

Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining
The cardiac allografts without immunosuppression showed various extents of mononuclear cell infiltration and myocyte damage starting at day 3. These histological changes increased gradually after transplantation. Mononuclear cell infiltration in the allografts from MAb-treated or FK506-treated mice at day 7 was less than that in the nontreated allografts (data not shown).

Immunohistochemistry
Widespread and dense distribution of IFN-{gamma}– and IL-2–producing cells was observed in the allografts from nontreated mice, but cells were present with less frequency in the MAb- or FK506-treated allografts (Fig 2Down). The number of IFN-{gamma}–producing cells peaked on day 5 and gradually declined, whereas that of IL-2–producing cells gradually increased in the allografts from nontreated mice. In contrast, IL-4– and IL-10–producing cells were invariably present in the cardiac interstitium of MAb-treated mice. The ratio of Th2 cells to Th1 cell population in nontreated animals was always greater than that of MAb-treated mice during the course of observation (Table 1Down).



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical staining of allografts from untreated mice (A to D), MAb-treated mice (E to H), or FK506-treated mice (I to L). All allografts were removed at day 7. Frozen sections were stained with anti–IL-2 (A, E, I), anti–IFN-{gamma} (B, F, J), anti–IL-4 (C, G, K), and anti–IL-10 (D, H, L) MAbs. Magnification x400.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ratio of Th1/Th2 Cell Population

RT-PCR
mRNA encoding the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma} was present in the cardiac allografts but not present in the isografts. On day 7, an intense signal corresponding to IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 was detected in the nontreated allografts but not in the allografts treated with the MAbs after 30 cycles of PCR. In contrast, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNAs were present on day 7 in allografts with MAb treatment as well as in nontreated allografts after 40 cycles of PCR. However, differences in Th2 cytokine transcription between treated and nontreated allografts could not be detected by this method (Fig 3Down). These experiments were repeated three times with consistent results.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RT-PCR shows amplified cDNA from cytokine mRNA encoding IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma} in cardiac allografts on day 7. Intense signal corresponding to IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 is detected in nontreated allografts (N) but not in allografts with MAbs (A). In contrast, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNAs are present on day 7 in allografts treated with MAbs and nontreated allografts. mRNA from EL-4 cells with PMA stimulation was used as positive control.

Northern Blot Assay
IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 mRNAs were detected in allografts from nontreated mice, but the transcript was suppressed in the isografts and allografts of MAb-treated and FK506-treated mice. The IL-4 transcript was enhanced in the spleens from mice with MAb treatment, but the transcript was reduced in the isografts and allografts from nontreated and FK506-treated mice (Fig 4Down). The experiment was repeated twice with consistent results. IL-10 transcripts could not be detected in any of the grafts and spleens by this method.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Northern blot hybridization assay on day 7. Arrowheads indicate mRNA signals for (A) IL-2 in cardiac allograft, (B) IFN-{gamma} in cardiac allograft, and (C) IL-4 in spleen. mRNA for Th1 cytokines IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 is enhanced in allografts from nontreated mice (N), but transcripts are suppressed in the isografts (I), allografts from MAb-treated mice (A), and FK506-treated mice (F). mRNA for IL-4 is enhanced in spleens from mice with MAb treatment (A), but transcript is reduced in other samples. Ratio of radioactivity of mRNA signal for cytokines to background radioactivity was calculated. Data are as follows: A, IL-2: 1.0 (I), 22.5 (N), 9.5 (A), and 4.5 (F). B, IFN-{gamma}: 1.0 (I), 5.3 (N), 2.2 (A), and 1.0 (F). C, IL-4: 1.0 (I), 5.1 (N), 7.6 (A), and 3.0 (F).

Administration of rIL-2
Isograft beat was not affected by an injection of rIL-2. Five of 7 mice treated with a total of 100 000 U rIL-2 rejected cardiac allografts within 25 days (Table 2Down). These allografts showed typical histological features of acute rejection. One of the 5 mice treated with 25 000 U rIL-2 rejected the allograft at day 20, whereas the other 4 mice accepted allografts indefinitely. In contrast, an administration of rIL-2 beginning on day 50 after tolerance induction did not affect the allograft beat. Once established, tolerance could not be abrogated by exogenous rIL-2 (Fig 5Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of rIL-2 Administration on Survival of Cardiac Allografts Treated With Anti–ICAM-1 and Anti–LFA-1 MAbs



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Graft survival curve showing effects of rIL-2 administration on cardiac allografts treated with anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1. Five of 7 mice treated with 100 000 U rIL-2 rejected cardiac allografts within 25 days ({bullet}), whereas 1 of 5 mice treated with 25 000 U rIL-2 rejected allograft ({blacksquare}). In contrast, administration of rIL-2 to isografted mice ({blacktriangleup}) and to allografted mice starting on day 50 ({circ}) did not affect graft beat.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Adhesion molecules play important roles in immune responses to transplanted organs. Significant induction of adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin in association with acute cardiac rejection is reported.22 23 Specific tolerance is achieved by a short-term administration of anti–ICAM-1 and anti–LFA-1 in a mouse heterotopic cardiac allograft model.1 Similar immunosuppression is also induced by blocking VCAM-1/very late antigen–424 or CD28/B725 26 adhesion.

Cell adhesion mediated by the LFA-1/ICAM-1 system is an essential part of various T-cell functions in vitro. Costimulatory signals mediated by CD28, LFA-1, or very late antigen–4 are required for T-cell activation and clonal expansion.4 27 T-cell receptor–mediated stimulation in the absence of a costimulatory signal can lead to T-cell inactivation.3 28 The continuous stimulation with alloantigens in the absence of the LFA-1–mediated costimulatory signal by blocking LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction is postulated to lead to the induction of this specific tolerance. One of the important clues to follow in the investigation of this assumption could be to evaluate IL-2 production in the tolerant mice, because a lack of IL-2 transcription is involved in clonal anergy induced by an absence of costimulatory signals in vitro.3

Differential development of immature helper cells (Th0) into mature Th1 or Th2 cells is an important factor in determining the kinetics of cytokine production and immune responses to rejection.29 30 Many investigators have reported the characteristics of the Th1/Th2 cytokine profile in a variety of experimental models.9 10 11 12 13 14 The absence of differences in Th1 or Th2 expression in spontaneously accepting versus rejecting liver transplant recipients is also demonstrated14 ; however, the results are not consistent. It is possible that the roles of cytokines may differ depending on the methods used to induce tolerance and on the organs transplanted. Also, the majority of investigators use the RT-PCR technique to quantify cytokine mRNA of transplanted organs. RT-PCR is a sensitive approach to detect mRNA, yet it involves difficulty in quantification. We addressed this problem by using Northern blot assay to quantify Th1/Th2 cytokine mRNA.

The results of Northern blot assay and RT-PCR clearly demonstrated that Th1 mRNA expression was enhanced in the rejected grafts but was reduced in the grafts from MAb-treated mice. RT-PCR revealed a clear difference in Th1 cytokine mRNA expression between rejecting and tolerant spleens while showing equal amplification of their Th2 cytokines. Northern blot assay was performed because subtle changes in cytokine mRNA expression may not be detectable by RT-PCR. The results showed relatively intense IL-4 mRNA transcription in the tolerant spleen compared with mice with other treatments. Transcription of this Th2 cytokine in the spleen was weak in mice treated with FK506, and that in the mice with rejecting cardiac allografts showed an intermediate intensity. Enhanced IL-4 expression in the mice treated with MAbs could be responsible for regulating the Th development from Th0 to Th2.

The effects of cyclosporine on cytokine expression have been investigated in detail. It is noteworthy that Th2 cytokine expression between FK506 and antiadhesion therapy differed. Cyclosporine selectively blocks IL-2,31 IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, and IL-10 transcripts in the transplanted grafts.10 FK506 also acts on IL-2 production by T cells and on expression of IL-2 receptors.32 However, the effect of FK506 on Th2 cytokine production remains uncertain at present. The difference in IL-4 mRNA expression between FK506 and MAb treatment observed in the present study indicates the differences among mechanisms of immunosuppression.

Immunohistological studies showed that IFN-{gamma}–expressing cells were located in the area of mononuclear cell infiltration in the rejected grafts. IL-2– as well as IFN-{gamma}–positive cells were present in the rejected grafts and were located mainly near damaged muscles. This localization is most closely related to destruction of myocytes. Conversely, IL-4– and IL-10–expressing cells were more frequently observed in the tolerant than in the rejected allografts. The total numbers of infiltrating cells were different between rejected and tolerant grafts, so that the ratio of Th2 (IL-4+IL-10) to Th1 (IL-2+IFN-{gamma}) was a valuable indicator of altered Th development. The ratio was significantly greater in the tolerant grafts than in the rejected grafts. The observation that IL-2 production in response to in vitro stimulation is reduced in MAb-treated mice also suggests that an impairment of IL-2 production is involved in the induction of tolerance by antiadhesion therapy. Interestingly, lymphocytes from tolerant mice produced a certain amount of IL-2 in response to donor allostimulation in vitro. Mechanisms of this response should be studied further.

In 5 of 7 graft recipients, treatment with exogenous IL-2 effectively interfered with development of allograft tolerance that results from blocking LFA-1/ICAM-1 adhesion in vivo. These data further support the idea that IL-2 production is impaired during the tolerance induction. In contrast, administration of rIL-2 starting on day 50 after tolerance induction did not affect allograft beat. Tolerance, once established, could not be abrogated by exogenous IL-2. These observations suggest that induction and maintenance of tolerance may be driven by different molecular mechanisms.

Using immunohistochemical studies, Sayegh et al12 reported similar changes in Th1/Th2 cytokines in their model of tolerance induction to rat kidney allografts by CD28/B7 blockade. A distinctive difference in costimulation between CD28 and LFA-1 has been reported. Costimulation with ICAM-1 is required for activation of resting T cells, whereas costimulation with B7 is necessary for restimulation of activated T cells.33 34 It is therefore reasonable to assume that costimulatory signals through LFA-1 are involved in the initiation of immune responses, and CD28 gives the costimulation necessary to sustain proliferation of antigen-primed T cells. Also, recent investigations suggest that LFA-1 and CD28 transduce signals through different phosphorylation cascades.35 36 It is of interest that blockade of two different adhesion molecules, LFA-1 and CD28, leads to similar immune reactions to transplanted organs. Although the function and signaling pathway for T-cell clonal expansion differ, the absence of costimulatory signals from CD28 and LFA-1 could result in a similar outcome: suppression of Th1 cells and preservation of Th2 cells. It has been shown that stimulation of Th0 cells in the absence of costimulation could anergize Th1 clones, whereas IL-4 production by Th2 was spared.37 It is possible to assume that through such mechanisms, antigen-specific Th2 clones are expanded while Th1 clones become inactivated.

It is clear from our experiments that the cytokine profile is significantly altered in tolerant mice compared with mice that reject cardiac allografts. The impairment of IL-2 production and the activation of Th2 cytokines are involved in tolerance induction by blocking of ICAM-1/LFA-1 adhesion, as demonstrated by the in vivo and in vitro studies. It is noteworthy that immunosuppression by FK506 did not enhance the Th2 transcript. These findings certainly expand our knowledge of immune system reaction to transplanted organs and will lead to the development of new modes of specific immunosuppression. Further experiments are needed to clarify the role of Th2 activation in inducing specific immune tolerance for the clinical treatment of transplantation.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
ICAM = intercellular adhesion molecule
IFN = interferon
IL = interleukin
LFA = leukocyte function–associated antigen
MAb = monoclonal antibody
PCR = polymerase chain reaction
rIL = recombinant interleukin
RT = reverse transcription
Th = T helper cell
VCAM = vascular cell adhesion molecule


*    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank Misako Horii for excellent technical assistance and Prof Takashi Yokota for providing the mouse cDNA for IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma}. We are also indebted to Prof Ko Okumura of Juntendo University for providing the MAbs. We are grateful to Drs Takumi Takeuchi, Hiroki Kurihara, Masayuki Nomura, Gen Suzuki, Takashi Yokota, Ken-ichi Arai, Toshio Nishikawa, and Hideo Nariuchi for valuable discussions. This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture; the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation; the Ryoichi Naito Foundation for Medial Research; the Cell Science Research Foundation; and the Institute for Adult Diseases, Asahi Life Foundation.

Received January 16, 1997; revision received April 24, 1997; accepted April 28, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Isobe M, Yagita H, Okumura K, Ihara A. Specific acceptance of cardiac allograft after treatment with anti-ICAM-1 and anti-LFA-1. Science. 1992;255:1125-1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Isobe M, Ihara A. Tolerance induction against cardiac allograft by anti-ICAM-1 and anti-LFA-1 treatment: T cells respond to in vitro allostimulation. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:1079-1080.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mueller D, Jenkins M, Schwartz R. Clonal expansion versus functional clonal inactivation: a costimulatory outcome of T cell antigen receptor occupancy. Annu Rev Immunol. 1989;7:445-480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. van Seventer GA, Shimizu Y, Horgan KJ, Shaw S. The LFA-1 ligand ICAM-1 provides an important costimulatory signal for T cell receptor-mediated activation of resting T cells. J Immunol. 1990;144:4579-4586.[Abstract]
  5. Mosmann TR, Coffman RL. Th1 and Th2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion to different functional properties. Annu Rev Immunol. 1989;7:143-173.
  6. Klamus SM, Falco DA, Villanueva JC, Rabkin J, Tomlanovich SJ, Vincenti F, Amend WJC, Melzer J, Garovoy MR, Roberts JP, Ascher NL, Matinez OM. Cytokine and T cell receptor gene expression at the site of allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1992;53:151-156.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Romball CG, Weigle WO. In vivo induction of tolerance in murine CD4 cell subsets. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1637-1644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. O'Connell PJ, Pacheco SA, Nickerson PW, Muggia RA, Bastos M, Kelley VR, Strom TB. Unmodified pancreatic islet allograft rejection results in the preferential expression of certain T cell activation transcripts. J Immunol. 1993;150:1093-1104.[Abstract]
  9. Dallman MJ, Larsen CP, Morris PJ. Cytokine gene transcription in vascularised organ grafts: analysis using semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction. J Exp Med. 1991;174:493-496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Takeuchi T, Lowry RP, Konieczny B. Heart allografts in murine systems: the differential activation of Th2-like effector cells in peripheral tolerance. Transplantation. 1992;53:1281-1294.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Binder J, Hancock WW, Wasowska B, Gallon L, Watschinger B, Sayegh MH, Brock J, Lehmann M, Volk HD, Kupiec WJ. Donor-specific transplantation unresponsiveness in sensitized rats following treatment with a nondepleting anti-CD4 MAb is associated with selective intragraft sparing of Th2-like cells. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:114-116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Sayegh MH, Akalin E, Hancock WW, Russell ME, Carpenter CB, Linsley PS, Turka LA. CD28-B7 blockade after alloantigenic challenge in vivo inhibits Th1 cytokines but spares Th2. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1869-1874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hofmann WJ, Dufter C, Terness P, Thies J, Post S, Otto G, Otto HF, Geisse T, Gaweco AS. Lack of preferential Th1/Th2 cytokine gene expression patterns in both alpha/beta T-cell-tolerant and -rejecting rat cardiac allografts. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:232-234.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Thai NL, Fu F, Qian S, Sun H, Gao L, Wang SC, Demetris AJ, Woo J, Thomson AW, Duquesnoy RJ, Fung JJ. Cytokine mRNA profiles in mouse orthotopic liver transplantation: graft rejection is associated with augmented TH1 function. Transplantation. 1995;59:274-281.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Dallman MJ, Shiho O, Page TH, Wood KJ, Morris PJ. Peripheral tolerance to alloantigen results from altered regulation of the interleukin 2 pathway. J Exp Med. 1991;173:79-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nishimura T, Yagi H, Hashimoto Y. The role of lymphokine-activated cell-associated antigen, II: distribution and correlation with cell cycle. Cell Immunol. 1987;107:24-31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Takei F. Inhibition of mixed lymphocyte response by a rat monoclonal antibody to a novel murine lymphocyte activation antigen (MALA-2). J Immunol. 1985;134:1403-1407.[Abstract]
  18. Isobe M, Narula J, Strauss HW, Khaw BA, Haber E. Imaging the rejecting heart: in vivo detection of MHC class II antigen induction. Circulation. 1992;85:738-746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Isobe M, Haber E, Khaw BA. Early detection of rejection and assessment of cyclosporine therapy by indium-111 antimyosin imaging in mouse heart allografts. Circulation. 1991;84:1246-1255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bogen SA, Fogelman I, Abbas AK. Analysis of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-{gamma} producing cells in situ during immune responses to protein antigens. J Immunol. 1993;150:4197-4205.[Abstract]
  21. Morgan CJ, Pelletier RP, Hernandez CJ, Teske DL, Huang E, Ohye R, Orosz CG, Ferguson RM. Alloantigen-dependent endothelial phenotype and lymphokine mRNA expression in rejecting murine cardiac allografts. Transplantation. 1993;55:919-923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Taylor PM, Rose ML, Yacoub MH, Pigott R. Induction of vascular adhesion molecules during rejection of human cardiac allografts. Transplantation. 1992;54:451-457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Tanio JW, Basu CB, Albelda SM, Eisen HJ. Differential expression of the cell adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin in normal and posttransplantation myocardium: cell adhesion molecule expression in human cardiac allografts. Circulation. 1994;89:1760-1768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Isobe M, Suzuki J, Yagita H, Okumura K, Yamazaki S, Nagai R, Yazaki Y, Sekiguchi M. Immunosuppression to cardiac allografts and soluble antigens by anti-VCAM-1 and anti-VLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol. 1994;153:5810-5818.[Abstract]
  25. Lenschow DJ, Zeng Y, Thistlethwaite JR, Montag A, Brady W, Gibson MG, Linsley PS, Bluestone JA. Long-term survival of xenogeneic pancreatic islet grafts induced by CTLA4Ig. Science. 1992;257:789-792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Turka AL, Linsley PS, Lin H, Brady W, Leiden JM, Wei RQ, Gibson ML, Zheng XG, Myrdal S, Gordon D. T cell activation by the CD28 ligand B7 is required for cardiac allograft rejection in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:11102-11105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Altmann D, Hogg N, Trowsdale J, Wilkinson D. Cotransfection of ICAM-1 and HLA-DR reconstitutes human antigen-presenting cell function in mouse L cells. Nature. 1989;338:512-514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Geppert TD, Davis LS, Gur H, Wacholtz MC, Lipsky PE. Accessory cell signals involved in T-cell activation. Immunol Rev. 1990;117:5-66.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Cher DJ, Mosmann TR. Two types of murine helper T cell clones, II: delayed-type hypersensitivity is mediated by Th1 clones. J Immunol. 1987;138:3688-3694.[Abstract]
  30. Fong TAT, Mossman TR. Alloreactive murine CD8+ T cell clones secrete the Th1 pattern of cytokines. J Immunol. 1990;144:1744-1752.[Abstract]
  31. Calne RY, Rolles K, White DJG, Thiru S, Evans DB, McMaster P, Dunne DC, Craddock GN, Henderson RG, Aziz S, Lewis P. Cyclosporine-A initially as the only immunosuppressant in 34 recipients of organs: 32 kidneys, 2 pancreases, 2 livers. Lancet. 1979;2:1033-1036.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Todo S, Fung JJ, Demetris AJ, Venkataramanan R, Startzl TE. Early trials with FK506 as primary treatment in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1990;22:13-16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Damle NK, Klussman K, Linsley PS, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA. Differential regulatory effects of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on costimulation by the CD28 counter-receptor B7. J Immunol. 1992;149:2541-2548.[Abstract]
  34. Damle NK, Klussman K, Leytze G, Myrdal S, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA, Linsley PS. Costimulation of T lymphocytes with integrin ligands intercellular adhesion molecule-1 or vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 induces functional expression of CTLA-4, a second receptor for B7. J Immunol. 1994;152:2686-2697.[Abstract]
  35. Kanner SB, Grosmaire LS, Ledbetter JA, Damle NK. Beta 2-integrin LFA-1 signaling through phospholipase C-gamma 1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:7099-7103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rudd CE, Janssen O, Cai YC, Silva AD, Raab M, Prasad KV. Two-step TCR zeta/CD3-CD4 and CD28 signaling in T cells: SH2/SH3 domains, protein-tyrosine and lipid kinases. Immunol Today. 1994;15:225-234.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gajewski TF, Lancki DW, Stack R, Fitch FW. `Anergy' of TH0 helper T lymphocytes induces downregulation of TH1 characteristics and a transition to a TH2-like phenotype. J Exp Med. 1994;179:481-491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Isobe, H. Kosuge, and J.-i. Suzuki
T Cell Costimulation in the Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Potential Targets for Therapeutic Interventions
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(7): 1447 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q.-W. Zhang, D. D. Kish, and R. L. Fairchild
Absence of Allograft ICAM-1 Attenuates Alloantigen-Specific T Cell Priming, But Not Primed T Cell Trafficking into the Graft, to Mediate Acute Rejection
J. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 170(11): 5530 - 5537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. D. Straw, A. S. MacDonald, E. Y. Denkers, and E. J. Pearce
CD154 Plays a Central Role in Regulating Dendritic Cell Activation During Infections That Induce Th1 or Th2 Responses
J. Immunol., January 15, 2003; 170(2): 727 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. H. Smits, E. C. de Jong, J. H. N. Schuitemaker, T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, Y. van Kooyk, M. L. Kapsenberg, and E. A. Wierenga
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1/LFA-1 Ligation Favors Human Th1 Development
J. Immunol., February 15, 2002; 168(4): 1710 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Bechard, A. Scherpereel, H. Hammad, T. Gentina, A. Tsicopoulos, M. Aumercier, J. Pestel, J.-P. Dessaint, A.-B. Tonnel, and P. Lassalle
Human Endothelial-Cell Specific Molecule-1 Binds Directly to the Integrin CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1) and Blocks Binding to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1
J. Immunol., September 15, 2001; 167(6): 3099 - 3106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-i. Seino, K. Fukao, K. Muramoto, K. Yanagisawa, Y. Takada, S. Kakuta, Y. Iwakura, L. Van Kaer, K. Takeda, T. Nakayama, et al.
Requirement for natural killer T (NKT) cells in the induction of allograft tolerance
PNAS, February 15, 2001; (2001) 41608298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B. M. Spriewald, M. Hara, A. Bushell, S. Jenkins, P. J. Morris, and K. J. Wood
Differential Role for Competitive Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction and Intracellular Cytokine Staining as Diagnostic Tools for the Assessment of Intragraft Cytokine Profiles in Rejecting and Nonrejecting Heart Allografts
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2000; 157(5): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J.-i. Suzuki, M. Isobe, S. Yamazaki, S. Horie, Y. Okubo, and M. Sekiguchi
Sensitive diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection by detection of cytokine transcription in situ
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1998; 40(2): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-i. Seino, K. Fukao, K. Muramoto, K. Yanagisawa, Y. Takada, S. Kakuta, Y. Iwakura, L. Van Kaer, K. Takeda, T. Nakayama, et al.
Requirement for natural killer T (NKT) cells in the induction of allograft tolerance
PNAS, February 27, 2001; 98(5): 2577 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isobe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiguchi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isobe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiguchi, M.