(Circulation. 1997;96:2348-2352.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiology Unit, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Correspondence to Martin M. LeWinter, MD, Cardiology Unit, Fletcher Allen Health Care, MCHV Campus, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401. E-mail mlewinte{at}salus.uvm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Ten open-chest dogs were subjected to a 10-minute acute coronary occlusion (proximal left anterior descending coronary artery). A servomotor connected to the left atrium (LA) was used to rapidly clamp LA pressure during systole below the level of the succeeding LV diastolic pressure, resulting in nonfilling diastoles during which the LV fully relaxed at its ESV. LA clamps at multiple ESVs (conductance catheter) allowed delineation of positive and negative portions of the fully relaxed LV pressure-volume relation (FRPVR). A negative fully relaxed pressure (FRP) indicates the presence of restoring forces. After 10 minutes of acute coronary occlusion, there was an upward shift of the FRPVR. Thus, for example, at matched ESVs before and during coronary occlusion, FRP was -1.1±1.1 (±SD) mm Hg before versus 0.2±1.2 mm Hg after 10 minutes of coronary occlusion (P<.05).
Conclusions Acute coronary occlusion results in a rapid decrease in forces responsible for suction. This phenomenon is independent of the level of ESV and may contribute to ischemic diastolic dysfunction.
Key Words: restoring forces ventricular function diastolic filling coronary occlusion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we and others have described an LA servomotor system that rapidly clamps LAP at a specified value during systole and maintains it at that value during the subsequent diastole.15 16 We used this device to produce nonfilling diastoles by clamping LAP at a level below the LV diastolic pressure. This allowed measurement of the FRP at its end-systolic configuration and delineation of the relation between FRP and ESV and Veq. A negative FRP indicates that a restoring force is present. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that acute coronary occlusion decreases the ability of the LV to generate a negative FRP and therefore impairs filling by suction.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol
After instrumentation was completed, the calcium channel blocker
zatebradine (UL-FS 49, 1 mg/kg IV, Boehringer Ingelheim)
was administered. Zatebradine slows the sinus rate but does not
significantly depress cardiac
contractility.18 At this dose, we were
able to consistently pace the LA at 90 bpm with 1:1
atrioventricular conduction and maintain heart rate
constant at this value throughout the study. We then applied brief
partial caval constrictions and aortic constrictions to generate a
variety of steady-state ESVs. At each ESV, data were recorded with
respiration suspended at end expiration during four or five
steady-state beats followed by a nonfilling beat. To produce nonfilling
diastoles, the servomotor system was used to rapidly clamp
the LAP below the LV diastolic pressure during
ventricular systole, as described earlier.15
The LV was allowed to fully relax at its ESV, and the FRP was measured
as the plateau value after completion of relaxation. To ensure that no
LV filling occurred during LAP clamp beats, we required that there be
no change in the conductance catheter volume signal after the time of
the LV-LA crossover pressure (determined from the filling beat
preceding the LAP clamp beat) and that LV pressure decline
monotonically to a plateau value during the LAP clamp. Using color
Doppler, we previously showed that beats meeting these criteria do
not demonstrate transmitral flow during the LAP clamp.15
The LAD was then occluded, and after 10 minutes, measurements of the
FRP were repeated at several different ESVs. In each experiment, we
required that the midwall segment display systolic bulging
during coronary occlusion. Delineation of as complete a range
of ESVs as those obtained before coronary occlusion was not
attempted because of the time required to alter the steady-state ESV
and measure the FRP during this nonsteady-state intervention.
Data Analysis
All data were digitized on-line at a 200-Hz sampling frequency
and analyzed with custom-designed software for heart rate, peak
systolic LV pressure, peak positive and negative LV dP/dt,
LVEDP (LVP when LV +dP/dt reached 10% of its maximum value), LV-LA
crossover pressure, T1/2 (time for LVP to decrease by 50%
from its end-systolic value, defined as LV pressure at 30 ms
before minimum dP/dt), and FRP during the LAP clamp. We also calculated
the average rate of LVP fall over 10 ms after the LV-LA pressure
crossover (average dP/dt) for the filling beat immediately preceding
the LAP clamp and for the clamped beat after the LV pressure dropped
below the LV-LA crossover value of the preceding filling beat. The
uncalibrated conductance catheter signal17 was used to
determine ESV as the smallest volume preceding peak negative dP/dt. The
sonomicrometer signals were used to ensure that there was
dyskinesis in the ischemic region during coronary
occlusion.
Nikolic et al19 20 21 have previously fitted the relation
between FRP and ESV (the FRPVR) to different logarithmic equations for
its positive and negative portions. (Above Veq, they
included fully relaxed values from both filling and nonfilling beats.)
In their preparation, an electronically controlled mitral valve
prosthesis was used to occlude the mitral orifice and produce
nonfilling diastoles.19 20 Negative FRPs in
the -5 to -10 mm Hg range were recorded. In our
preparation15 and another22 used to produce
nonfilling diastoles in which the native mitral valve has
been intact, less negative FRPs (typically -2 to -3 mm Hg) have
been recorded. In consequence, we usually recorded FRPs over a
very narrow negative range. As a result, we could not
consistently fit the coronary occlusion FRPVR data to
curvilinear equations of any form. We therefore report
representative examples of FRPVR data sets obtained
before and during coronary occlusion. In view of our inability
to fit the FRPVR data, we refer to changes in "apparent"
Veq. To statistically analyze our data, we compared
FRP at matched values of ESV before and during coronary
occlusion by the following algorithm. We first selected a control beat
with a negative FRP. Then we selected a beat during coronary
occlusion whose ESV was smaller but otherwise closest to the ESV of the
control beat. Since the magnitude of FRP is inversely proportional to
ESV, comparison of the control beat with a beat during occlusion with a
smaller ESV biased against our hypothesis that FRP is less negative
during occlusion. We also compared segment lengths during nonfilling
diastoles before and during coronary occlusion. As
we previously reported,15 the segment undergoes an initial
deformation during nonfilling diastoles but then assumes a
constant value after completion of relaxation (Fig 1
). In each dog, we compared this plateau
segment length at an ESV before occlusion that was identical to that
used for FRP comparisons with the value present during occlusion,
at an ESV matched as closely as possible to that present before
coronary occlusion.
|
A paired t test was used to compare each parameter. For all statistical comparisons, P<.05 was considered significant. Data are reported as mean±SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Representative examples of FRPVR data for control and
coronary occlusion conditions are shown in Fig 2
. An upward shift of the FRPVR over the
range of our observations is evident during coronary occlusion.
In the case shown on the left, none of the FRPs during coronary
occlusion were negative, and the lowest values occurred at ESVs
associated with slightly negative control FRPs. By interpolation,
apparent Veq was shifted to the left (smaller) during
coronary occlusion. In the case shown on the right, the FRPs
during coronary occlusion were recorded over a larger range
of ESVs, including one negative value, and apparent Veq was
again shifted to the left. In 7 of 10 dogs, there was a clear upward
shift of both the negative- and positive-pressure portions of the FRPVR
in association with a leftward shift of apparent Veq to a
smaller value during coronary occlusion. In 1 dog, there was a
definite upward shift that appeared to be confined to the negative
range, in 1 a small upward shift confined to the negative range,
and in 1 no apparent shift. In the Table
,
baseline hemodynamic data before (control) and during
acute coronary occlusion are shown in the left two columns
(baseline refers to conditions present in the absence of any load
manipulation). During coronary occlusion, EDP and
T1/2 were slightly increased (the latter was statistically
significant only for nonfilling beats), whereas average dP/dt was
substantially reduced during occlusion for both filling and nonfilling
beats. LA-LV crossover and LV minimum pressure were higher during
coronary occlusion, but only the latter was statistically
significant. FRP was significantly increased by an average of 2.1
mm Hg during coronary occlusion. Data at matched ESV before
and during coronary occlusion are shown in the two right
columns of the Table
. LV peak systolic pressure tended to be
reduced (P<.06) during coronary occlusion because
caval constriction was required to produce matched ESV points. Under
these conditions, LVEDP was not significantly different. Because of the
ESV matching algorithm, ESV was very slightly but significantly smaller
during coronary occlusion. Changes in T1/2, while
similar to those during baseline, were not significant, whereas average
dP/dt remained substantially decreased. Neither LA-LV crossover nor LV
minimum pressure was significantly changed during coronary
occlusion. Under these conditions, FRP increased significantly from an
average value of -1.1 to 0.2 mm Hg.
|
|
Comparisons of segment length values at matched ESV during nonfilling diastoles revealed a significantly larger mean value during coronary occlusion (10.1±2.4 mm before versus 11.0±2.4 mm during coronary occlusion, P<.02). For these comparisons, ESV averaged 76.7 mL before and 77.3 mL during coronary occlusion (P=.8).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability to generate restoring forces depends on ESV, the position of the negative FRPVR, and Veq. A positive inotropic agent (dobutamine) has been reported to lower the position of the negative FRPVR without changing Veq.8 20 With coronary occlusion, the position of the negative FRPVR was shifted upward, usually in association with a decrease in Veq. Thus, during coronary occlusion, suction would be expected to be impaired due to the combination of the change in position of the FRPVR (a less negative or a positive pressure at any ESV <control Veq), decreased Veq per se, which makes it more difficult to contract to an ESV <Veq, and depression of overall contractile function, which also makes it more difficult to contract to an ESV <Veq.
Although the FRPVR was shifted upward, this does not necessarily mean that a reduced ability to generate restoring forces was the cause. An important assumption underlying equating a negative FRP with the magnitude of restoring forces is that myofilament inactivation and as a result diastolic tension are normal. If inactivation were impaired such that diastolic tension were elevated, FRP would increase independently of any effect on restoring forces. (Obviously, the term FRP would then also be a misnomer.) Although diastolic calcium concentration may be elevated in supply ischemia, it has generally been considered that diastolic tension is not as a result of concomitant myofilament calcium desensitization.1 It would also be surprising if an ischemia-related alteration in cellular calcium handling so severe that it resulted in incomplete inactivation were to cause marked effects on late LV pressure fall but minimal effects on isovolumic pressure fall. Thus, although we cannot exclude it, an increase in FRP due to incomplete inactivation seems unlikely.
If the change in FRP resulted from a decrease in restoring forces, a straightforward explanation would be reduced blood volume in the perfusion zone of the occluded LAD, with a decrease in regional wall thickness and a resultant decrease in passive stretch of elastic elements in the wall at ESVs below Veq. If the only factor responsible for a change in FRP during coronary occlusion were decreased turgor, the predicted result would be an upward shift at ESVs below Veq and a downward shift at ESVs above Veq3 4 but no change in Veq itself. Thus, the fact that Veq was reduced during coronary occlusion suggests that additional factors influence the FRP. One possibility is interference with deformations that normally accompany contraction below Veq and are thought to be partly responsible for suction, for example, differences in subepicardial and subendocardial contraction and relengthening and twist, which allow storage of the potential energy of restoring forces before it is converted to elastic recoil and suction.11 12 13 14 However, during the course of a nonfilling diastole, such contraction-related deformations should revert to the undeformed state and associated restoring forces should dissipate as relaxation progresses and therefore not contribute to the FRP. Our finding that the segment length during nonfilling diastoles was longer during coronary occlusion at matched ESV suggests another possibility. "Creep" of ischemic segments at end diastole has been recognized for many years23 and attributed to repeated stretching of the ischemic tissue. Moreover, a longer segment length is exactly the opposite of what would be anticipated on the basis of a decrease in blood volume in the wall. Thus, in addition to decreased turgor, complex alterations in regional wall stress distribution due to creep in the ischemic region could influence the FRP and provide an explanation for the decrease in apparent Veq. Further studies will be required to fully understand the factors that alter FRP during coronary occlusion. Regardless of the mechanism, however, the change in FRP once again serves to reduce the net force responsible for suction.
During coronary occlusion, there was a decrease in the rate of late LVP fall (average dP/dt) for both normal filling and nonfilling beats. A decrease in or loss of restoring forces in effect reduces instantaneous LV chamber compliance during the time that restoring forces are dissipated, ie, during early filling. However, it is unknown whether dissipation of restoring forces influences rate of LVP fall. Our results are consistent with this possibility, but there are other explanations. A decrease in myocyte relaxation rate due to a reduced rate of calcium removal from the myofilaments has already been mentioned. As has been discussed, complex transmural and 3D deformations normally occur during relaxation and filling. During nonfilling diastoles, regional deformations remain despite the absence of filling.15 (Indeed, as suggested earlier, the latter may be a manifestation of partial dissipation of restoring forces generated during contraction.) These deformations represent normally occurring regional inhomogeneities and must also be associated with changes in loads imposed on the myofibers during relaxation.24 Thus, slowing of late pressure fall during coronary occlusion could reflect an alteration in the load dependence of myofilament inactivation related to increased regional inhomogeneity most marked during the later phase of relaxation.24 This would also fit with the very minimal effect on isovolumic pressure fall, since these inhomogeneities would be most marked during filling, when volume is unconstrained. Last, a coronary occlusionrelated increase in viscous resistance to filling is another explanation,25 26 27 but this is unlikely because average dP/dt was decreased by a similar extent during coronary occlusion even in the absence of filling.
Study Limitations
As discussed, because of a limited range of data points, we could
not fit these data to mathematical models, which would have allowed a
more complete and rigorous description of the changes in the FRPVR that
were observed. However, we purposely analyzed the data in a way
that would bias against an upward shift.
Our data were recorded at low to low-normal EDPs; therefore, it is
legitimate to question their relevance to clinical coronary
occlusion and myocardial infarction, in which EDP is typically normal
or elevated. In our previous study in an identical
preparation,15 we showed that restoring forces are
normally present over approximately the lower half of the
physiological range of LVEDP, with Veq
occurring when EDP is on average
8 mm Hg. In many cases of
coronary occlusion and/or myocardial infarction, EDP remains
normal or is reduced to normal by treatments such as inotropic drugs,
vasodilators, or diuretics. These same treatments also reduce
ESV. Thus, our results may be most applicable to these situations.
Moreover, our open-chest preparation with barbiturate
anesthesia undoubtedly resulted in some depression in
baseline contractile performance, tending to increase ESV and
minimize restoring forces compared with more
physiological conditions. Last, the actual changes
in FRP in this study were quantitatively small. However,
ventricular suction operates via its effects on the early
diastolic transmitral pressure gradient, and the magnitude
of change we observed is not small in relation to the usual magnitude
of the gradient.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 12, 1996; revision received May 12, 1997; accepted May 20, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. C. Little Diastolic Dysfunction Beyond Distensibility: Adverse Effects of Ventricular Dilatation Circulation, November 8, 2005; 112(19): 2888 - 2890. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yotti, J. Bermejo, J. C. Antoranz, M. M. Desco, C. Cortina, J. L. Rojo-Alvarez, C. Allue, L. Martin, M. Moreno, J. A. Serrano, et al. A Noninvasive Method for Assessing Impaired Diastolic Suction in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy Circulation, November 8, 2005; 112(19): 2921 - 2929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Courtois, S. J. Kovacs, P. A. Ludbrook, S. B. Bell, and M. M. LeWinter Diastolic Suction During Acute Coronary Occlusion • Response Circulation, November 10, 1998; 98 (19): 2098 - 2102. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |