Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:2656-2666

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubey, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubey, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, E. K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH

(Circulation. 1997;96:2656-2666.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Exogenous and Endogenous Adenosine Inhibits Fetal Calf Serum–Induced Growth of Rat Cardiac Fibroblasts

Role of A2B Receptors

Raghvendra K. Dubey, PhD; Delbert G. Gillespie, BS; Zaichuan Mi, BM; ; Edwin K. Jackson, PhD

From the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology (E.K.J.), University of Pittsburgh (Pa) Medical Center.

Correspondence to Dr Raghvendra K. Dubey, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, 623 Scaife Hall, 200 Lothrop St, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582. E-mail dubey{at}med1.dept-med.pitt.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Because proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts participates in cardiac hypertrophy/remodeling associated with hypertension and myocardial infarction, it is important to elucidate factors regulating cardiac fibroblast proliferation. Adenosine, a nucleoside abundantly produced by cardiac cells, is antimitogenic vis-à-vis vascular smooth muscle cells; however, the effect of adenosine on cardiac fibroblast proliferation is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize the effects of exogenous and endogenous (cardiac fibroblast–derived) adenosine on cardiac fibroblast proliferation.

Methods and Results Growth-arrested cardiac fibroblasts were stimulated with 2.5% FCS in the presence and absence of adenosine, 2-chloroadenosine (stable adenosine analogue), or modulators of adenosine levels, including (1) erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl) adenine (EHNA; adenosine deaminase inhibitor); (2) dipyridamole (adenosine transport blocker); and (3) iodotubericidin (adenosine kinase inhibitor). All of these agents inhibited, in a concentration-dependent manner, FCS-induced cardiac fibroblast proliferation as assessed by DNA synthesis ([3H]thymidine incorporation) and cell counting. EHNA, dipyridamole, and iodotubericidin increased extracellular levels of adenosine by 2.3- to 5.6-fold when added separately to cardiac fibroblasts, and EHNA+iodotubericidin or EHNA+iodotubericidin+dipyridamole increased extracellular adenosine levels by >690-fold. Both KF17837 (selective A2 antagonist) and DPSPX (nonselective A2 antagonist) but not DPCPX (selective A1 antagonist) blocked the antimitogenic effects of 2-chloroadenosine, EHNA, and dipyridamole on DNA synthesis, suggesting the involvement of A2A and/or A2B but excluding the participation of A1 receptors. The lack of effect of CGS21680 (selective A2A agonist) excluded involvement of A2A receptors and suggested a major role for A2B receptors. This conclusion was confirmed by the rank order potencies of four adenosine analogues.

Conclusions Cardiac fibroblasts synthesize adenosine, and exogenous and cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine inhibits cardiac fibroblast proliferation via activation of A2B receptors. Cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine may regulate cardiac hypertrophy and/or remodeling by modulating cardiac fibroblast proliferation.


Key Words: adenosine • myocardial infarction • hypertension


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cardiac fibroblasts are importantly involved in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodeling induced by hypertension, myocardial infarction, and myocardial reperfusion injury after ischemia.1 Cardiac fibroblasts contribute to pathological structural changes in the heart by undergoing proliferation, depositing extracellular matrix proteins, and replacing myocytes with fibrotic scar tissue.1 Thus, cardiac fibroblast–induced cardiac remodeling may participate in diastolic and systolic dysfunction, leading to congestive heart failure.

A number of autocrine/paracrine factors1 as well as physical forces such as mechanical stretch2 can stimulate cardiac fibroblast growth. In a normal heart, however, quiescence is maintained by a balance between circulating and cardiac-derived inhibitors and promoters of cardiac fibroblast growth.3 Disruption of the balanced generation of growth promoters and inhibitors under pathological conditions could trigger an increased proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts, enhanced deposition of extracellular matrix by cardiac fibroblasts, and enlargement and stiffening of the heart. Therefore, autocrine/paracrine factors generated by cells within the heart wall that inhibit cardiac fibroblast growth may play a major cardioprotective role.

In this regard, adenosine may be an important antiproliferative factor. Adenosine is synthesized by the cardiac wall and exerts numerous cardioprotective4 and anti–vaso-occlusive5 actions. Cardiomyocytes,6 vascular SMCs,7 8 and endothelial cells,9 10 both vascular9 11 and cardiac,9 10 have several metabolic pathways for generating large amounts of adenosine. For example, it has been shown that endothelial cells synthesize adenosine and have an adenine pool that is two to three times greater than that of hepatocytes.10 11 Moreover, we have recently shown that cardiac fibroblasts, which constitute 60% of the total heart cells,12 can also synthesize adenosine from exogenous cAMP.13

Adenosine has long been known as a "retaliatory" metabolite, particularly in the heart, where it induces cardioprotective effects.13 Furthermore, adenosine has several anti–vaso-occlusive properties; for instance, adenosine induces vasodilation,14 inhibits platelet aggregation,15 prevents neutrophil adhesion to vascular and cardiac endothelial cells,16 attenuates neutrophil-induced endothelial cell damage,16 stimulates nitric oxide release from vascular endothelial cells,17 activates the cellular antioxidant defense system18 and prevents oxygen free radical–induced injury,16 and blocks the synthesis of potent mitogenic factors such as angiotensin II and norepinephrine by inhibiting renin release19 and noradrenergic neurotransmission.20 Moreover, we have recently shown that both exogenous and SMC-derived adenosine inhibits FCS-induced growth of SMCs.21 Because several factors regulating SMC growth have similar effects on cardiac fibroblast growth, we hypothesize that adenosine may be a potential endogenous factor that is important in regulating cardiac fibroblast growth and maintaining cardiac homeostasis.

Accordingly, the aims of the present study were (1) to determine whether exogenous adenosine inhibits growth of cardiac fibroblasts, (2) to identify the adenosine receptor subtype(s) involved in mediating any antiproliferative effects of adenosine on cardiac fibroblasts, (3) to determine whether cardiac fibroblasts synthesize adenosine, and (4) to determine whether cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine can effectively inhibit cardiac fibroblast growth. To accomplish these aims, it was necessary to stimulate cardiac fibroblast growth, for which purpose FCS was selected. The rationale for choosing FCS was that it is the most potent growth stimulator, containing a battery of growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, angiotensin II, endothelin, and norepinephrine, that have been implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodeling in hypertension and myocardial infarction. To investigate the synthesis and antiproliferative properties of endogenous adenosine, it was necessary to prevent the metabolism of cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine. In the present study, this was accomplished by inhibiting (1) adenosine deaminase with EHNA, (2) adenosine kinase with IDO, and (3) adenosine uptake with DIP.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
DMEM, DMEM/F12 medium, HBSS, penicillin, streptomycin, 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution, collagenase, and all tissue culture ware were purchased from GIBCO Laboratories. FCS was obtained from HyClone Laboratories Inc. Adenosine, Cl-Ad, EHNA, and DIP were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. CPA, CGS21680, DPCPX, IDO, DPSPX, NECA, and MECA were purchased from Research Biochemicals International. KF17837 was a generous gift from Dr F. Suzuki, Pharmaceutical Research Laboratories, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co Ltd, Sunto, Shizuoka, Japan. [3H]Thymidine (specific activity, 11.8 Ci/mmol) was purchased from ICN Biomedicals. All other chemicals used were of tissue culture grade or best grade available.

Cardiac Fibroblast Cell Culture
Sprague-Dawley male rats (n=12) weighing 150 to 200 g were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, Mass) and were fed standard rat chow and tap water ad libitum. Both left ventricular and atrial cardiac fibroblasts were cultured by the method of Farivar et al22 using the enzymatic digestion and selective plating technique, with minor modifications. Briefly, hearts were obtained from ether-anesthetized rats via a midline abdominal incision, including the diaphragm. The atria and left ventricle were removed and minced separately, and the minced sections were washed twice with DMEM. The sections were suspended in 5 mL of collagenase type II in DMEM and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour in a shaking water bath. The supernatant obtained after 1 hour of incubation was discarded, and the tissue was incubated further in fresh collagenase solution for 1 hour. After collagenase digestion, the dissociated cells were centrifuged, and the pellet was suspended in complete culture medium (DMEM/F12 supplemented with HEPES 25 mmol/L). Cells were plated in tissue culture flasks (75 cm2) and incubated under standard tissue culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO2/95% air, and 98% humidity). Because cardiac fibroblasts adhere to culture surfaces faster than myocytes and endothelial cells, cardiac fibroblasts could be separated from endothelial cells and myocytes by selective plating. Briefly, 2 hours after plating, the nonadherent cells in the supernatant were removed after gentle shaking, and the flasks were washed once with complete culture medium. The attached cardiac fibroblasts were subsequently fed complete culture medium and allowed to grow under standard tissue culture conditions. The cardiac fibroblasts grew robustly and were confluent in 5 to 7 days. Confluent monolayers of cardiac fibroblasts were dislodged by treatment with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution and passaged further. Cardiac fibroblasts in the second and third passages were used in all studies.

Purity of the cardiac fibroblasts was assessed by immunostaining and by examination of the morphology of the cells at the second and third passages. More than 98% of the cells had fibroblast morphology, ie, were thin and triangular with a light cytoplasm. Myocytes, which are large, contain birefringent nuclei and dark cytoplasm-containing granules and myofibrils, and contract rhythmically in culture, and endothelial cells, which have a characteristic cobblestone morphology, were absent in the cultures. Negative staining was observed in cells treated with polyclonal antibody against von Willebrand factor (factor VIII) and with monoclonal antibodies against sarcomeric (striated muscle) actin and desmin, suggesting the absence of endothelial cells, SMCs, and myocytes. Moreover, reaction with polyclonal anti-vimentin antibody positively stained >99% of monolayers. Taken together, these findings suggest that the cultured cells were pure cardiac fibroblasts.

DNA Synthesis
[3H]Thymidine incorporation studies were done to investigate the effects of agents on FCS-induced DNA synthesis. Atrial or ventricular cardiac fibroblasts were plated at a density of 2.5x104 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture dishes and allowed to grow for 48 hours in complete culture medium containing 10% FCS under standard tissue culture conditions. The cells were then growth-arrested by feeding with complete culture medium containing 0.4% BSA (Sigma) for 48 hours. Growth was initiated by treatment of growth-arrested cells for 20 hours with complete culture medium supplemented with 2.5% FCS and containing or lacking adenosine receptor agonists or antagonists or modulators of adenosine metabolism (TableDown) as follows: adenosine, Cl-Ad, CPA, CGS21680, NECA, MECA, Cl-Ad plus DPCPX, Cl-Ad plus KF17837, Cl-Ad plus DPSPX, EHNA, DIP, IDO, EHNA plus IDO, DIP plus IDO, DIP plus IDO plus EHNA, KF17837, EHNA plus KF17837, DIP plus KF17837, DPSPX, EHNA plus DPSPX, DIP plus DPSPX, DPCPX, EHNA plus DPCPX, or DIP plus DPSPX. After 20 hours of incubation, the treatments were repeated with freshly prepared solutions but supplemented with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/mL) for an additional 4 hours. The experiments were terminated by two washings of the cells with Dulbecco's PBS and two with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (10%). The precipitate was solubilized in 500 µL of 0.3N NaOH and 0.1% SDS after incubation at 50°C for 2 hours. Aliquots from 4 wells for each treatment with 10 mL scintillation fluid were counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Each experiment was repeated four to six times.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pharmacology of Agents That Interact With the Adenosine System

Cell Proliferation (Cell Number)
Trypsinized cardiac fibroblasts in the third passage were suspended in complete culture medium containing 10% FCS and plated in a 24-well culture dish at a density of 1x104 cells/well. After incubation for 18 hours, the cells were fed complete culture medium containing 0.25% FCS for 48 hours to growth-arrest the cells. To study the effects of adenosine on FCS-induced cytokinesis, we treated growth-arrested cardiac fibroblasts every 24 hours for 4 days with complete culture medium containing 2.5% FCS and supplemented with or lacking adenosine, Cl-Ad, CPA, CGS, NECA, MECA, EHNA, DIP, IDO, EHNA plus DIP, EHNA plus IDO, DIP plus IDO, or DIP plus IDO plus EHNA. The treatments were terminated on day 5, and cells were dislodged with trypsin-EDTA, diluted in Isoton-II, and counted with a hemocytometer-calibrated Coulter counter. Aliquots from 4 wells were counted for each group, and four to six independent experiments were performed for each treatment.

Adenosine Synthesis by Cardiac Fibroblasts: Effects of EHNA, IDO, and DIP
To evaluate whether atrial and ventricular cardiac fibroblasts synthesize adenosine, we assayed adenosine synthesis by cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts in the presence and absence of EHNA, IDO, and DIP to augment endogenous adenosine levels. Briefly, cardiac fibroblasts (atrial or ventricular, third passage) were plated in 12-well culture plates and grown to confluency by feeding with complete culture medium containing 10% FCS. On the day of the experiment, confluent monolayers of cells were washed twice with Dulbecco's PBS and then incubated with buffered PBS (Dulbecco's PBS, HEPES 25 mmol/L, NaHCO3 13 mmol/L) supplemented with 2.5% FCS and containing or lacking EHNA, DIP, IDO, EHNA plus DIP, EHNA plus IDO, DIP plus IDO, or DIP plus IDO plus EHNA. After 4 hours of incubation, the supernatants were withdrawn and transferred into ice-cold microcentrifuge tubes and frozen at -70°C until adenosine levels were estimated. After the collection of supernatants, the monolayers of cells were inspected microscopically for intactness, and the numbers of cells were counted.

To evaluate whether cardiac fibroblasts catabolize adenosine, we also assayed the levels of adenosine in the medium of confluent monolayers of cardiac fibroblasts treated for 4 hours with exogenous adenosine (10 µmol/L) in the presence and absence of EHNA, IDO, or EHNA plus IDO. All experiments were conducted in nine separate cultures. The data were normalized to cell numbers, which were counted after the medium was collected.

Adenosine Analysis
Adenosine levels in the samples were analyzed by HPLC via our previously described method.23 Briefly, samples were thawed and centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 5 minutes. Supernatant (80 µL) was injected into an Isco HPLC system (pump model 2350, gradient programmer model 2360, V4 absorbance detector, 4.6x250-mm C18 column with 5-µm particle size, and ChemResearch Data Management System). Mobile phase A was KH2PO4 (0.1 mol/L, pH 6.1) and mobile phase B was 80% KH2PO4 (0.01 mol/L, pH 3.5) and 20% methanol. Mobile phase A was maintained at 100% for 11 minutes, a 2-minute linear gradient to 50% A was initiated, 50% A was maintained for 21 minutes, a 2-minute linear gradient back to 100% A was initiated, and 100% A was maintained for at least 24 minutes before the next sample was injected. Adenosine levels were quantified as the area under the chromatographic peak, and the absolute amount in each sample was calculated from a standard curve of adenosine.

Statistics
All growth experiments were performed in triplicate or quadruplicate with four to six separate cultures, whereas adenosine synthesis and catabolism experiments were performed with seven to nine separate cultures. Data for the DNA synthesis, cell number, and adenosine levels in the medium are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA, paired Student's t test, or Fisher's least significant difference test as appropriate. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of Exogenous Adenosine and Cl-Ad on FCS-Induced Growth of Atrial Cardiac Fibroblasts
Compared with the growth-arrested cells, treatment with 2.5% FCS stimulated DNA synthesis by 7- to 10-fold (P<.001; data not shown). Both adenosine and Cl-Ad inhibited FCS-induced [3H]thymidine incorporation in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1Down). Compared with adenosine, Cl-Ad was more potent in inhibiting FCS-induced thymidine incorporation. The lowest concentrations of adenosine and Cl-Ad that significantly inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis were 10 and 0.1 nmol/L, respectively. A 50% decrease in FCS-induced thymidine incorporation by adenosine and Cl-Ad was observed at 400 and 6 µmol/L, respectively (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Concentration-response relationships for inhibition of 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (top) and cell number (bottom) by adenosine and Cl-Ad in atrial cardiac fibroblasts. Values are percent of control, defined as thymidine incorporation or cell number in presence of 2.5% FCS. Values for each data point represent mean±SEM from five or six separate experiments, each conducted in quadruplicate. *P<.05 vs control; {dagger}P<.05 vs cells treated with same concentration of adenosine.

The density of the cells during exposure to an agent can alter its response because the rate of catabolism would depend on the number of cells present. Therefore, we compared the effects of adenosine on FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in cells plated at a high density (2.5x104 cells/well) versus a lower density (5x103 cells/well). Additionally, to test whether catabolism of adenosine by adenosine deaminase21 is responsible for altering/reducing the inhibitory effects of adenosine, we studied the effects of adenosine on FCS-induced DNA synthesis in cells in the presence and absence of EHNA.

The inhibitory effects of adenosine on FCS-induced DNA synthesis were significantly increased when cells plated at the lower density were treated with adenosine (Fig 2Down). Low concentrations of adenosine (0.1 nmol/L) inhibited FCS-induced thymidine incorporation by {approx}20% in cells plated at low density but not in cells plated at high density. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of adenosine were significantly enhanced in the presence of EHNA (Fig 2Down). To evaluate whether adenosine in the cells and/or medium is metabolized by adenosine deaminase and/or adenosine kinase, the levels of adenosine in the medium of cells treated with adenosine 10 µmol/L in the presence and absence of EHNA, IDO, or EHNA plus IDO were measured. As shown in Fig 3Down, the levels of adenosine in the medium of cells treated with adenosine alone were close to those observed in controls (cells treated with vehicle). However, in cells treated with adenosine in the presence of the adenosine deaminase inhibitor EHNA or the adenosine kinase inhibitor IDO, a significant increase in the recovery of adenosine in the medium was observed (Fig 3Down). Moreover, in cells treated with EHNA plus IDO, a dramatic increase in the recovery of adenosine in the medium was observed (2511-fold higher than cells treated with adenosine alone; Fig 3Down).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Left, Effects of EHNA (10 µmol/L) on modulating effects of exogenous adenosine on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation into atrial cardiac fibroblasts; right, comparison of inhibitory effects of adenosine on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in atrial cardiac fibroblasts plated at low (5x103 cells/well) and high (2.5x104 cells/well) density. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, defined as thymidine incorporation in absence of adenosine (four or five experiments, each conducted in quadruplicate). *P<.05 vs control; {dagger}P<.05 vs effects on high-density cardiac fibroblasts.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Catabolism (top) and synthesis (bottom) (logarithmic y axis) of adenosine (Ade) by cultured rat atrial cardiac fibroblasts. Adenosine concentrations were measured in medium of confluent monolayers of cells treated for 4 hours under standard tissue culture conditions with buffered PBS (without serum) containing or lacking adenosine 10 µmol/L, IDO 1 µmol/L, EHNA 10 µmol/L, DIP 0.1 µmol/L, DIP plus EHNA, DIP plus IDO, EHNA plus IDO, EHNA plus IDO plus DIP, Ade plus EHNA, Ade plus IDO, or Ade plus EHNA plus IDO. Values are nmol · L-1 · 106 cells-1 · 4 hours-1 and represent mean±SEM of eight or nine separate cell cultures. *P<.01 vs cells treated with buffer; {dagger}P<.01 vs cells treated with exogenous adenosine alone; §P<.001 vs cells treated with Ade plus IDO or EHNA; #P<.01 vs cells treated with EHNA, IDO, or EHNA alone.

FCS induced proliferation (cell number) of growth-arrested atrial cardiac fibroblasts by 9- to 11-fold. Adenosine and Cl-Ad inhibited FCS-induced increase in cell number in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1Up). Like the effects on DNA synthesis, Cl-Ad was more potent in inhibiting cell proliferation than was adenosine. Trypan blue exclusion tests indicated no loss in viability of cells treated with adenosine. In cells treated with Cl-Ad, cell toxicity was observed at the maximal concentration of Cl-Ad used (10-3 mol/L); however, at lower concentrations (10-10 to 10-4 mol/L), no loss in cell viability was evident (data not shown).

Effect of Atrial Cardiac Fibroblast–Derived Adenosine on FCS-Induced Cell Growth
To evaluate the effects of endogenous cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine on cell growth, we assayed the effects of EHNA, IDO, and DIP on FCS-induced cardiac fibroblast growth as well as on adenosine synthesis. Adenosine levels were nondetectable in samples drawn at time zero; however, the levels of adenosine were significantly increased in the medium of cardiac fibroblasts collected after 4 hours of incubation (Fig 3Up). Compared with untreated controls, treatment of cells with EHNA, DIP, or IDO increased the levels of adenosine in the medium (Fig 3Up). Moreover, in cells treated with EHNA+IDO or EHNA+IDO+DIP, the levels of adenosine were increased >100-fold compared with cells treated only with EHNA or IDO (Fig 3Up).

EHNA, DIP, and IDO inhibited FCS-induced [3H]thymidine incorporation in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 4Down). The lowest concentrations of EHNA, DIP, and IDO that significantly inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis were 10, 0.01, and 0.01 µmol/L, respectively. A 50% decrease in FCS-induced thymidine incorporation by EHNA, DIP, and IDO was observed at {approx}50, 3, and 1 µmol/L, respectively (Fig 4Down).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Concentration-response relationships for inhibition of 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in atrial cardiac fibroblast by EHNA, DIP, and IDO. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, with 100% defined as thymidine incorporation in presence of 2.5% FCS. Each data point represents mean±SEM from four to six experiments, each conducted in quadruplicate. *P<.05 vs control.

Like the effects on DNA synthesis, EHNA, DIP, and IDO inhibited FCS-induced increase in cell number in a concentration-dependent manner and in the following order of potency: DIP=IDO>EHNA (Fig 5Down). The lowest concentrations of DIP, IDO, and EHNA that inhibited cell proliferation were 0.01, 0.01, and 10 µmol/L, respectively (Fig 5Down). Half-maximal effects of EHNA, DIP, and IDO on cell proliferation were observed at 10 to 25, 0.1, and 0.1 µmol/L, respectively (Fig 5Down). Because EHNA, IDO, and DIP induce adenosine levels by separate mechanisms, we studied their combined inhibitory effects on cell growth. As shown in Fig 6Down, the inhibitory effects of EHNA, DIP, and IDO on thymidine incorporation and cell number were greater with combinations of these agents than with the individual agents. Moreover, in cells treated with EHNA plus DIP plus IDO, FCS-induced cell proliferation was completely blocked.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Concentration-response relationships for inhibition of 2.5% FCS-induced atrial cardiac fibroblast growth (cell number) by EHNA, DIP, and IDO after 4 days of treatment. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, with 100% defined as cell number in presence of 2.5% FCS (n=4 experiments, each in quadruplicate). *P<.05 vs control.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of EHNA 10 µmol/L, IDO 1 µmol/L, and DIP 0. 1 µmol/L alone and in combination on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (top) and cell number (bottom) in atrial cardiac fibroblasts. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, defined as thymidine incorporation or cell number in presence of 2.5% FCS (n=4 or 5 experiments, each in quadruplicate). *P<.01 vs control (2.5%FCS); {dagger}P<.05 vs EHNA and adenosine.

Effect of Receptor-Selective Adenosine Analogues (CPA, CGS21680, NECA, and MECA) on FCS-Induced Growth of Atrial Cardiac Fibroblasts
High (10-4 mol/L) but not low concentrations of CPA and CGS21680 inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis and cell proliferation (Fig 7Down). NECA was more potent than CPA and CGS21680 but less potent than MECA. Although NECA was more potent than CGS21680 and CPA in inhibiting thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation, it was significantly less potent than Cl-Ad. In contrast, MECA was as potent as Cl-Ad in inhibiting FCS-induced increases in cell number (compare Fig 1Up with Fig 7Down).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Concentration-response relationships for inhibition of 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (top) and cell number (bottom), by CPA, CGS21680, NECA, and MECA. Values for each point represent mean±SEM from four to six separate experiments conducted in quadruplicate in separate cultures. *P<.01 vs control (2.5% FCS).

Effects of A1 (DPCPX) and A2 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists (DPSPX, KF17837) on Cl-Ad–, EHNA-, and DIP-Induced Inhibition of DNA Synthesis in Atrial Cardiac Fibroblasts
Because CGS21680 had little effect on FCS-induced growth and CPA was less potent than NECA, MECA, and Cl-Ad, the possible involvement of A1 and A2A receptor in mediating the inhibitory effects of adenosine could be ruled out (TableUp). Further experiments were conducted using the adenosine receptor antagonists DPCPX, DPSPX, and KF17837, which inhibit the effects of adenosine by blocking A1, A1+A2, and A2 receptors, respectively (TableUp). KF17837 and DPSPX but not DPCPX significantly reversed the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad on FCS-induced DNA synthesis (Fig 8Down).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Top, Inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad 10 µmol/L on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in atrial cardiac fibroblasts in presence and absence of KF17837 (KF) 10-9 mol/L, DPSPX 10-9 mol/L, and DPCPX 10-8 mol/L. Bottom, Effects of DPCPX 10-8 mol/L on modulating effects of EHNA 10 µmol/L and DIP 0.1 µmol/L on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in atrial cardiac fibroblasts. Values for each bar are mean±SEM from five separate experiments conducted in quadruplicate in separate cultures. *P<.01 vs control (2.5% FCS); {dagger}P<.05 vs Cl-Ad.

We also determined the effects of EHNA and DIP on DNA synthesis in the presence and absence of adenosine receptor antagonists (DPCPX, DPSPX, and KF17837). The inhibitory effects of EHNA and DIP on FCS-induced DNA synthesis were significantly attenuated by the A2 receptor antagonists KF17837 and DPSPX (Fig 9Down) but not by the A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX (Fig 8Up). These data confirm that the inhibitory effects of EHNA and DIP were mediated via generation of endogenous adenosine and that the inhibitory effects of atrial cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine on cell growth were mediated via A2 adenosine receptors. Trypan blue exclusion tests indicated no loss in viability of cells treated with CPA, CGS21680, MECA, NECA, DPSPX, KF17837, or DPCPX, and <0.5% took up the dye (data not shown).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Effects of KF17837 (KF) 10-9 mol/L and DPSPX 10-9 mol/L on modulating effects of EHNA 10 µmol/L (bottom) and DIP 0.1 µmol/L (top) on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in atrial cardiac fibroblasts. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, defined as thymidine incorporation in presence of 2.5% FCS (n=5 experiments, each in quadruplicate). *P<.05 vs control (2.5% FCS); {dagger}P<.05 vs DIP or EHNA.

Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Adenosine on FCS-Induced DNA Synthesis in Cardiac Fibroblasts Cultured From Left Ventricles
Because the abnormal growth of cardiac fibroblasts in the left ventricle also contributes to cardiac remodeling, we investigated whether exogenous and endogenous adenosine inhibits FCS-induced DNA synthesis in left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts. Adenosine and its analogues with A2B receptor activity, including Cl-Ad, MECA, and NECA, but not agonists with A1 (CPA) or A2A (CGS21680) receptor activity inhibited FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (Fig 10ADown). Adenosine analogues inhibited ventricular cardiac fibroblasts in the following order of potency:



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. A, Comparison of concentration-response relationships for inhibition of 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts by adenosine, Cl-Ad, MECA, NECA, and CGS21680. Values are percent of control; values for each point represent mean±SEM from four separate experiments conducted in quadruplicate in separate cultures. *P<.05 vs control; {dagger}P<.05 vs Cl-Ad; §P<.05 vs NECA, CPA, and CGS21680. B, Semilogarithmic bar graph showing synthesis of adenosine by left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts. Adenosine concentrations were measured in medium of confluent monolayers of cells treated for 4 hours under standard tissue culture conditions with buffered PBS containing or lacking IDO 1 µmol/L, EHNA 10 µmol/L, DIP 0. 1 µmol/L, DIP plus EHNA, DIP plus IDO, EHNA plus IDO, or EHNA plus IDO plus DIP. Values are nmol · L-1 · 106 cells-1; each value represents mean±SEM of four to six experiments conducted in separate cultures. *P<.01 vs cells treated with buffer; {dagger}P<.01 vs cells treated with EHNA, IDO, or DIP alone. C, Effects of EHNA 10 µmol/L, IDO 1 µmol/L, and DIP 0.1 µmol/L alone and in combination on 2.5% FCS-induced thymidine incorporation in left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts. Values (mean±SEM) are percent of control, defined as thymidine incorporation in presence of 2.5% FCS (n=3 experiments, in quadruplicate). *P<.01 vs control (2.5% FCS); {dagger}P<.05 vs EHNA or IDO or DIP.

Cl-Ad=MECA >adenosine>NECA >CPA >CGS21680 (Fig 10AUp).

As in atrial cardiac fibroblasts, treatment with EHNA, DIP, and IDO increased exogenous adenosine levels in left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts (Fig 10BUp) and inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis (Fig 10CUp). The combined effects of EHNA, IDO, and DIP on adenosine levels (Fig 10BUp) and FCS-induced DNA synthesis (Fig 10CUp) in ventricular cardiac fibroblasts were greater than the effects of these agents alone. To confirm that the inhibitory effects of EHNA and DIP are due to increases in adenosine and that adenosine mediates its effects via A2 receptors, we studied the effects of Cl-Ad, EHNA, and DIP on DNA synthesis in the presence and absence of DPSPX, KF17837, and DPCPX. The inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad, EHNA, and DIP were reversed by DPSPX and KF17837 but not by DPCPX (Fig 11Down).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Inhibitory effects of (A) Cl-Ad 10 µmol/L, (B) EHNA 10 µmol/L, and (C) DIP 0.1 µmol/L on 2.5% FCS-induced DNA synthesis in ventricular cardiac fibroblasts in presence and absence of KF17837 (KF) 10-9 mol/L, DPSPX 10-9 mol/L, and DPCPX 10-8 mol/L. Values for each bar are mean±SEM from three separate experiments conducted in quadruplicate. *P<.01 vs control (2.5% FCS); {dagger}P<.05 Cl-Ad, EHNA, or DIP.

To rule out the possibility that serum-derived adenosine contributes to the inhibitory effects, we assayed adenosine levels in serum (2.5% in PBS) treated or not treated with EHNA, DIP, IDO, or EHNA+IDO in the presence and absence of exogenous adenosine (Fig 12Down). Adenosine levels were below detection limit in serum and serum plus EHNA, DIP, IDO, or EHNA+IDO. Moreover, adenosine levels were almost undetectable in samples in which exogenous adenosine (10 µmol/L) was incubated with 2.5% FCS but were {approx}6000- to 6600-fold higher in samples in which adenosine was incubated with FCS in the presence of EHNA or in the media without FCS. Compared with EHNA, IDO and DIP were less effective in preventing FCS-induced breakdown of adenosine. These results suggest that a substantial amount of adenosine deaminase is present in the serum and is responsible for catabolizing adenosine to inosine. This is further supported by the fact that serum is prepared by clotting blood, and red blood cells contain significant amounts of adenosine deaminase.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Effects of EHNA 10 µmol/L, DIP 0. 1 µmol/L, and IDO 1 µmol/L (logarithmic y axis) on synthesis and catabolism of exogenous adenosine 10 µmol/L by 2.5% FCS. Values are mean±SEM; n=4. *P<.05 vs 2.5% FCS; {dagger}P<.05 vs 2.5% FCS+adenosine; §P<.05 vs Ade+EHNA or Ade+IDO.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of the present study demonstrate that adenosine inhibits FCS-induced growth of atrial and left ventricular cardiac fibroblasts. Treatment of cardiac fibroblasts with adenosine, with a stable adenosine analogue (Cl-Ad), and with agents that elevate endogenous adenosine (EHNA, IDO, DIP) inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. The potency of MECA, an adenosine agonist with high affinity for A2 receptors,24 was similar to that of Cl-Ad, and the potency of NECA, an adenosine agonist with equal affinity for both A1 and A2 receptors,25 was less than that of MECA. The adenosine agonists CPA and CGS21680, which are selective A1 and A2A receptor agonists,25 respectively, were only weakly inhibitory. Thus, the inhibitory effects of adenosine are most likely mediated via A2B receptors and not via A1 or A2A receptors. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad, EHNA, and DIP were significantly reversed by KF17837, a selective A2 receptor antagonist,26 and by DPSPX, a nonselective A2 receptor antagonist,27 but not by DPCPX, an A1 receptor antagonist.25 Taken together, our findings provide the first evidence that exogenous as well as cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine inhibits serum-induced growth in an autocrine/paracrine fashion and via the A2B receptor.

The fact that cardiac fibroblast quiescence is maintained in a normal heart suggests that the growth-inhibitory effects dominate and are important for maintaining homeostasis in the heart. Therefore, it is feasible that decreased production of growth inhibitors (such as adenosine) may tilt the balance toward cardiac fibroblast growth, which would result in increased growth of cardiac fibroblasts, leading to cardiac remodeling, enlargement of the heart, and cardiac dysfunction. Hence, detailed knowledge of the roles of different endogenous inhibitors that regulate cardiac fibroblast growth and maintain homeostasis is of great clinical and therapeutic importance. In this regard, the role of the vasodilator adenosine has not been well investigated.

Structural changes in the heart probably involve multiple autocrine/paracrine/endocrine factors.1 2 3 FCS contains a battery of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, angiotensin II, endothelin, and norepinephrine, that may contribute to the cardiac remodeling process. Therefore, we thought it important to evaluate the effects of adenosine on FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts so as to elucidate the growth-regulatory effects of adenosine under more physiological conditions. The finding that adenosine inhibits FCS-induced cardiac fibroblast growth provides the first evidence that adenosine is an important modulator of cardiac fibroblast growth.

Our observation that CPA (an adenosine analogue that is highly selective for A1 receptors25 and mediates its effects at pharmacologically low doses [<10-9 mol/L]) was unable to inhibit FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts at low concentrations suggests that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are not mediated via A1 receptors. This conclusion is further supported by our observation that DPCPX, an adenosine receptor antagonist that is 700-fold selective for A1 receptors,25 was unable to block the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad on FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts. The observation that high concentrations of CPA inhibited FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts suggests the possible involvement of some receptor with low affinity for CPA. It has been shown that although CPA at low concentrations mediates its effects selectively via A1 receptors, high concentrations of CPA can activate both A2 and A4 adenosine receptors.25 Hence, it is possible that the inhibitory effects of CPA on cardiac fibroblast growth at high concentrations are mediated in part via either A2 or A4 adenosine receptors.

The finding that KF17837 and DPSPX but not DPCPX effectively reversed the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad suggests that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are A2 receptor mediated. Moreover, our observations that (1) CGS21680 is ineffective in mimicking the inhibitory effects of adenosine, (2) MECA was as effective as Cl-Ad in inhibiting cardiac fibroblast growth, and (3) NECA was more effective than CGS21680 but less effective than Cl-Ad and MECA provide strong evidence that the effects of adenosine are not mediated via A2A receptors. Rather, our data suggest that the A2B receptors may be involved in mediating the inhibitory effects of adenosine.

Our contention that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated via A2B receptors is further supported by the recently proposed and endorsed subclassification of A2A and A2B receptors.25 Gurden et al28 demonstrated that the relative potencies of CGS21680 and NECA can be used as a reference to differentiate A2A from either A2B or A1 receptors. When the effects of CGS21680 are as potent as NECA, this implicates the A2A receptor. However, when CGS21680 is much less potent than NECA, this indicates that the observed effects are mediated via activation of the A2B receptor subtype. In the present study, compared with CGS21680, NECA was more effective in mimicking the inhibitory effects of adenosine, which further substantiates our conclusion that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated via the A2B receptor.

A2 receptors are positively coupled with adenylyl cyclase, and their activation results in a significant increase in cAMP levels.25 Stimulation of cardiac fibroblasts with adenosine has been shown to elevate cAMP levels, and cAMP in turn has antiproliferative effects on cardiac fibroblasts.29 Therefore, the inhibitory effects of adenosine on cardiac fibroblast growth are most likely mediated largely via the second messenger cAMP; however, the participation of other mechanism(s) cannot be ruled out. Activation of A2B receptors by adenosine stimulates NO release from endothelial cells,17 and we have recently observed that adenosine amplifies lipopolysaccharide-induced NO release from vascular SMCs.30 Because NO inhibits cardiac fibroblast proliferation,3 this provides an additional pathway through which adenosine could inhibit cardiac fibroblast growth.

The above findings provide the first evidence that exogenous adenosine inhibits FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts and that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated via activation of A2B receptors. However, whether endogenous adenosine also inhibits cardiac fibroblast growth cannot be inferred from studies with agonists. Therefore, we examined the growth-inhibiting effects of agents that elevate cellular adenosine levels via different mechanisms to assess the role of endogenous, ie, cardiac fibroblast–derived, adenosine on cardiac fibroblast growth.

The physiological effects of adenosine are governed in part by the rapid rate of elimination of adenosine from the extracellular space. Elimination of adenosine from the interstitial space is mediated by facilitated transport of adenosine into cells, by the metabolism of adenosine to inosine by adenosine deaminase,31 32 and by the metabolism of adenosine to AMP by adenosine kinase.32 Inhibition of the enzyme adenosine deaminase by EHNA and the enzyme adenosine kinase by IDO as well as the inhibition of adenosine transport and metabolism by DIP has been shown to increase endogenous levels of adenosine.31 Hence, these three compounds were used in the present study to increase endogenous levels of adenosine so as to evaluate the effects of endogenously generated adenosine on FCS-induced growth.

Treatment of cardiac fibroblasts with EHNA, IDO, and DIP elevated the levels of adenosine in the culture medium and inhibited FCS-induced DNA synthesis and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts. Thus, the present study demonstrates that cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts synthesize adenosine and that cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine inhibits FCS-induced growth of cardiac fibroblasts in an autocrine fashion.

The observation that adenosine was present in the media of cultured cardiac fibroblasts provides evidence for basal synthesis of adenosine in these cells. This is further supported by the fact that adenosine levels increased dramatically in the presence of EHNA and IDO. We have previously demonstrated that cardiac fibroblasts can generate adenosine by metabolizing cAMP via the cAMP-adenosine pathway.29 However, in addition to the cAMP-adenosine pathway, three other distinct pathways for adenosine biosynthesis have been well established. (1) The intracellular ATP pathway involves sequential dephosphorylation of ATP to adenosine (ATP->ADP->AMP->adenosine) within the cell and is dependent on the balance between energy supply and demand.33 (2) The extracellular ATP pathway, which is not dependent on an imbalance between energy supply and demand, is a source of extracellular adenosine regardless of the metabolic demands of the cell.33 In this regard, release of adenine nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP) from sympathetic nerve terminals, adrenal chromaffin cells, platelets, and endothelial cells provides an extracellular ATP pathway in which ectoenzymes (ecto-ATPases, ecto-ADPases, and ecto-5'-nucleotidase) convert ATP to adenosine.33 (3) The transmethylation pathway, which involves the hydrolysis of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine to L-homocysteine and adenosine, is also involved.33 Unlike the intracellular and extracellular ATP pathways, the transmethylation reaction is relatively constant and provides a basal tone of adenosine production that does not depend on crisis events, such as ischemia, platelet activation, and neutrophil attack. The biosynthetic pathways involved in the basal synthesis of adenosine by cardiac fibroblasts cannot be deduced from the present study.

In cardiac fibroblasts treated with EHNA plus IDO, the adenosine levels increased by >690-fold. This suggests that both adenosine deaminase and adenosine kinase regulate adenosine elimination in cardiac fibroblasts. Direct evidence for this notion comes from our observation that when cardiac fibroblasts were treated with exogenous adenosine, only a fraction of adenosine, close to basal levels, was recovered in the medium. However, in the presence of EHNA plus IDO but not in the presence of EHNA or IDO alone, a dramatic increase in the recovery of adenosine was observed.

Our contention that the inhibitory effects of the modulators of endogenous adenosine on cardiac fibroblast growth are mediated via generation of adenosine is supported by our observation that the inhibitory effects of EHNA and DIP on DNA synthesis were significantly reversed by KF17837 and DPSPX. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of EHNA, IDO, and DIP were significantly enhanced when cardiac fibroblasts were treated with a combination of these agents. DPCPX did not reverse the inhibitory effects of EHNA and DIP on cardiac fibroblasts, which strongly suggests that the inhibitory effects of endogenous adenosine are mediated via A2 receptors.

As shown in Figs 3Up and 10Up, IDO, EHNA, and DIP at 1, 10, and 0.1 µmol/L, respectively, caused similar increases in adenosine, and as shown in Figs 4Up and 10Up, these same concentrations cause similar inhibition of DNA synthesis. However, as shown in Fig 5Up, these concentrations of IDO, EHNA, and DIP had somewhat disparate effects on cell number. There are several explanations for the finding that DIP and IDO were somewhat more effective than EHNA in inhibiting cardiac fibroblast proliferation even though the observed increase in adenosine levels in the medium were similar. Most likely, measurements of extracellular adenosine in the bulk medium in response to DIP and IDO underestimate the levels of adenosine at the surface of the monolayer, because adenosine is converted to inosine by adenosine deaminase in the medium. This notion is supported by our observation that compared with cells incubated in the presence of FCS, the basal extracellular levels of adenosine were significantly higher in cells incubated in the absence of serum (data not shown). Furthermore, when cardiac fibroblasts were treated with exogenous adenosine, close to basal levels were recovered in the medium (Fig 3Up). However, when adenosine was added to cardiac fibroblasts pretreated with EHNA, a dramatic increase in adenosine was observed in the medium (Fig 3Up). Because serum is prepared by clotting blood and red blood cells are well endowed with adenosine deaminase,5 it is possible that a substantial amount of adenosine deaminase is present in the serum and metabolizes adenosine to inosine. Another possibility for the uneven effects of IDO, EHNA, and DIP on cell number is that these drugs have additional effects on cell proliferation not mediated via adenosine.

Can our in vitro findings be extrapolated to physiological situations in vivo, and can adenosine prevent cardiac fibroblast growth in vivo? Our finding that low concentrations of adenosine were able to inhibit cardiac fibroblast growth in the presence but not the absence of EHNA suggests that although adenosine effectively inhibits cardiac fibroblast growth, its effects are underestimated in the present series of experiments, because they were conducted in the presence of FCS, which contains adenosine deaminase. Under physiological conditions in vivo, most of the adenosine deaminase is localized within cells,5 and adenosine in the extracellular compartment will be available in active form to mediate the physiological inhibitory effects on cardiac fibroblast growth. In addition, because adenosine is synthesized by cardiac fibroblasts,29 myocytes,6 and endothelial cells9 10 via multiple pathways, this would ensure pharmacologically active steady-state levels of adenosine locally at the interface between endothelial and cardiac fibroblasts as well as myocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. In contrast, pathological conditions associated with decreased adenosine synthesis or increased adenosine deaminase leakage would reduce the pharmacologically active levels of adenosine, and this would result in decreased antigrowth effects of adenosine. Indeed, data from our laboratory suggest that adenosine deaminase may participate in at least two disease states associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, ie, sickle cell anemia and aging/hypertension (unpublished observations).5 However, future studies are needed to confirm or deny this role of adenosine deaminase.

In conclusion, we provide evidence that cardiac fibroblasts synthesize adenosine and that both exogenous and cardiac fibroblast–derived adenosine inhibit FCS-induced growth of ventricular and atrial cardiac fibroblasts in an autocrine fashion. Our findings suggest that adenosine produced by cardiac fibroblasts may play a vital role as a local antigrowth agent and that abnormal/decreased synthesis of adenosine by cardiac fibroblasts or increased catabolism of adenosine by adenosine deaminase or adenosine kinase may contribute importantly to the abnormal growth of cardiac fibroblasts observed in hypertension, myocardial infarction, and reperfusion injury after ischemia. Agents that elevate endogenous adenosine could be clinically important in preventing abnormal growth and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts in cardiac diseases, thus exerting beneficial effects on the structure of the heart.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CGS21680 = 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamino adenosine hydrochloride
Cl-Ad = 2-chloroadenosine
CPA = N6-cyclopentyladenosine
DIP = dipyridamole
DPCPX = 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine
DPSPX = 1,3-dipropyl-8-p-sulfophenylxanthine
EHNA = erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl) adenine
HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography
IDO = iodotubericidin
MECA = 5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine
NECA = 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine
SMC = smooth muscle cell


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL-55314 and HL-35909).

Received April 21, 1997; accepted May 23, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Booz GW, Baker KM. Molecular signalling mechanisms controlling growth and function of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 1995;30:537-543.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Sadoshima J, Jahn L, Takahashi T, Kulik TJ, Izumo S. Molecular characterization of the stretch-induced adaptation of cultured cardiac cells: an in vitro model of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10551-10560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Fujisaki H, Ito H, Hirata Y, Tanaka M, Hata M, Lin M, Adachi S, Akimoto H, Marumo F, Hiroe M. Natriuretic peptides inhibit angiotensin II-induced proliferation of rat cardiac fibroblasts by blocking endothelin-1 gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1059-1065.

4. Mubagwa K, Mullane K, Flameng W. Role of adenosine in the heart and circulation. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32:797-813.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Jackson EK, Kohler M, Mi Z, Dubey RK, Tofovic SP, Carcillo JA, Jones GS. Possible role of adenosine deaminase in vaso-occlusive diseases. J Hypertens. 1996;14:19-29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Meghi P, Holmquist CA, Newby AC. Adenosine formation and release from neonatal-rat heart cells in culture. Biochem J. 1985;229:799-805.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Dubey RK, Mi Z, Gillespie DG, Jackson EK. Cyclic AMP-adenosine pathway inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth. Hypertension. 1996;28:765-771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Suzuki F, Jackson EK. Smooth muscle cell-derived adenosine inhibits cell growth. Hypertension. 1996;27(pt 2):786-793.

9. Deussen A, Moser G, Schrader J. Contribution of coronary endothelial cells to cardiac adenosine production. Pflugers Arch. 1986;406:608-614.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Mullane K, Bullough D. Harnessing an endogenous cardioprotective mechanism: cellular sources and sites of action of adenosine. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:1041-1054.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Smolenski RT, Kochan Z, McDouall R, Page C, Seymour A-ML, Yacoub MH. Endothelial nucleotide catabolism and adenosine production. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:100-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Eghbali M. Cardiac fibroblasts: function of gene expression and phenotype modulation. Basic Res Cardiol. 1992;87(suppl 2):183-189.

13. Newby AC. Adenosine and the concept of retaliatory metabolites. Trends Biochem Sci. 1984;9:42-44.

14. Headrick JP, Berne RM. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxations to adenosine in guinea pig aorta. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H62–H67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Cristalli G, Vittori S, Thompson RD, Padgett WL, Shi D, Daly JW, Olsson RA. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by adenosine receptor agonists. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1994;349:644-650.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Cornstein BN, Levin RI, Belanoff J, Weissmann G, Hirschhorn R. Adenosine: an endogenous inhibitor of neutrophil-mediated injury to endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:760-770.

17. Vials A, Burnstock G. A2-Purinoceptor-mediated relaxation in the guinea-pig coronary vasculature: a role for nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;109:424-429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Maggirwar SB, Dhanraj DN, Somani SM, Ramkumar V. Adenosine acts as an endogenous activator of the cellular antioxidant defense system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;201:508-515.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Jackson EK. Adenosine: a physiological brake on renin release. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;31:1-35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Ekas RD Jr, Steenberg ML, Eikenburg DC, Lokhandwala MF. Presynaptic inhibition of sympathetic neurotransmission by adenosine in the rat kidney. Eur J Pharmacol. 1981;76:301-307.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Osaka K, Suzuki F, Jackson EK. Adenosine inhibits growth of rat aortic smooth muscle cells: possible role of A2B receptor. Hypertension. 1996;27(pt 2):786-793.

22. Farivar RS, Chobanian AV, Brecher P. Salicylate or aspirin inhibits the induction of the inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res. 1996;78:759-768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Mi Z, Jackson EK. Metabolism of exogenous cyclic AMP to adenosine in the rat kidney. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273:728-733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Burns RF, Lu GH, Pugsley TA. Characterization of the A2 adenosine receptor labeled by [3H]NECA in rat striatal membranes. Mol Pharmacol. 1986;29:331-346.[Abstract]

25. Dalziel HH, Westfall DP. Receptors for adenine nucleotides and nucleosides: sub classification, distribution, and molecular characterization. Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:449-462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Shimada J, Suzuki F, Nonaka H, Ishii A, Ichikawa S. (E)-1,3-Dialkyl-7-methyl-8-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)xanthines: potent, and selective adenosine A2 antagonists. J Med Chem. 1992;35:2342-2345.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Feoktistov I, Biaggioni I. Adenosine A2b receptors evoke interleukin-8 secretion in human mast cells: an enprofylline-sensitive mechanism with implications for asthma. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1979-1986.

28. Gurden MF, Coates J, Ellis F, Evans B, Foster M, Hornby E, Kennedy I, Martin DP, Strong P, Vardey CJ, Wheeldon A. Functional characterization of three adenosine receptor types. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;109:693-698.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Jackson EK. Cardiac fibroblasts metabolize cyclic-AMP to generate adenosine. Hypertension. 1996;28:P7. Abstract.

30. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Jackson EK. Adenosine induces nitric oxide synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1996;28:P7. Abstract.

31. German DC, Kredich NM, Bjornsson TD. Oral dipyridamole increases plasma adenosine levels in human beings. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;45:80-84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Sciotti VM, Van-Wylen DG. Increases in interstitial adenosine and cerebral blood flow with inhibition of adenosine kinase and adenosine deaminase. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:201-207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Schrader J. Formation and metabolism of adenosine and adenine nucleotides in cardiac tissue. In: Phillis JW, ed. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1991:55-69.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S. A. Epperson, L. L. Brunton, I. Ramirez-Sanchez, and F. Villarreal
Adenosine receptors and second messenger signaling pathways in rat cardiac fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): C1171 - C1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Villarreal, S. A. Epperson, I. Ramirez-Sanchez, K. G. Yamazaki, and L. L. Brunton
Regulation of cardiac fibroblast collagen synthesis by adenosine: roles for Epac and PI3K
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): C1178 - C1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. L. Strande, A. Hsu, J. Su, X. Fu, G. J. Gross, and J. E. Baker
Inhibiting Protease-Activated Receptor 4 Limits Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rat Hearts by Unmasking Adenosine Signaling
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1045 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Xu, J. Pang, H. Yin, M. Li, W. Hao, C. Chen, and J.-M. Cao
Hexarelin suppresses cardiac fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis in rat
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2952 - H2958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Funakoshi, T. O. Chan, J. C. Good, J. R. Libonati, J. Piuhola, X. Chen, S. M. MacDonnell, L. L. Lee, D. E. Herrmann, J. Zhang, et al.
Regulated Overexpression of the A1-Adenosine Receptor in Mice Results in Adverse but Reversible Changes in Cardiac Morphology and Function
Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2240 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Podgorska, K. Kocbuch, M. Grden, A. Szutowicz, and T. Pawelczyk
Reduced ability to release adenosine by diabetic rat cardiac fibroblasts due to altered expression of nucleoside transporters
J. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 576(1): 179 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, and E. K. Jackson
Adenosine Inhibits PDGF-Induced Growth of Human Glomerular Mesangial Cells Via A2B Receptors
Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 628 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. K. Dubey, E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, M. Rosselli, F. Barchiesi, A. Krust, H. Keller, L. C. Zacharia, and B. Imthurn
Cytochromes 1A1/1B1- and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase-Derived Metabolites Mediate Estradiol-Induced Antimitogenesis in Human Cardiac Fibroblast
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Chen, S. Epperson, L. Makhsudova, B. Ito, J. Suarez, W. Dillmann, and F. Villarreal
Functional effects of enhancing or silencing adenosine A2b receptors in cardiac fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2478 - H2486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Chen, J. Chen, D. Li, X. Zhang, and J. L. Mehta
Angiotensin II Regulation of Collagen Type I Expression in Cardiac Fibroblasts: Modulation by PPAR-{gamma} Ligand Pioglitazone
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. P. Headrick, B. Hack, and K. J. Ashton
Acute adenosinergic cardioprotection in ischemic-reperfused hearts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H1797 - H1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Liao, S. Takashima, Y. Asano, M. Asakura, A. Ogai, Y. Shintani, T. Minamino, H. Asanuma, S. Sanada, J. Kim, et al.
Activation of Adenosine A1 Receptor Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy and Prevents Heart Failure in Murine Left Ventricular Pressure-Overload Model
Circ. Res., October 17, 2003; 93(8): 759 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Otsuki, H. Gao, K. Dahlman-Wright, C. Ohlsson, N. Eguchi, Y. Urade, and J.-A. Gustafsson
Specific Regulation of Lipocalin-Type Prostaglandin D Synthase in Mouse Heart by Estrogen Receptor {beta}
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2003; 17(9): 1844 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. S. Ostrom, J. E. Naugle, M. Hase, C. Gregorian, J. S. Swaney, P. A. Insel, L. L. Brunton, and J. G. Meszaros
Angiotensin II Enhances Adenylyl Cyclase Signaling via Ca2+/Calmodulin: Gq-Gs CROSS-TALK REGULATES COLLAGEN PRODUCTION IN CARDIAC FIBROBLASTS
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24461 - 24468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, L. C. Zacharia, M. Rosselli, B. Imthurn, and E. K. Jackson
Methoxyestradiols Mediate the Antimitogenic Effects of Locally Applied Estradiol on Cardiac Fibroblast Growth
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 412 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson
A2B Adenosine Receptors Stimulate Growth of Porcine and Rat Arterial Endothelial Cells
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 530 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. K. Jackson and R. K. Dubey
Role of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway in renal physiology
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F597 - F612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, and E. K. Jackson
Endogenous Cyclic AMP-Adenosine Pathway Regulates Cardiac Fibroblast Growth
Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1095 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. K. Dubey, Z. Mi, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson
Dysregulation of Extracellular Adenosine Levels by Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells From Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2001; 21(2): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, L. C. Zacharia, Z. Mi, and E. K. Jackson
A2B Receptors Mediate the Antimitogenic Effects of Adenosine in Cardiac Fibroblasts
Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 716 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, and E. K. Jackson
Cardiac Fibroblasts Express the cAMP-Adenosine Pathway
Hypertension, September 1, 2000; 36(3): 337 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. P. Barry and S. E. Lind
Adenosine-mediated Killing of Cultured Epithelial Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 60(7): 1887 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. T. Andresen, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, R. K. Dubey, and E. K. Jackson
Role of Adenosine A1 Receptors in Modulating Extracellular Adenosine Levels
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1999; 291(1): 76 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Tsuruda, J. Kato, K. Kitamura, M. Kawamoto, K. Kuwasako, T. Imamura, Y. Koiwaya, T. Tsuji, K. Kangawa, and T. Eto
An autocrine or a paracrine role of adrenomedullin in modulating cardiac fibroblast growth
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 1999; 43(4): 958 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. M. Feldman, D. R. Wagner, and D. M. McNamara
AMPD1 Gene Mutation in Congestive Heart Failure : New Insights Into the Pathobiology of Disease Progression
Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1397 - 1399.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson
Adenosine Inhibits Collagen and Total Protein Synthesis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 190 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson
Adenosine Inhibits Collagen and Protein Synthesis in Cardiac Fibroblasts : Role of A2B Receptors
Hypertension, April 1, 1998; 31(4): 943 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson
Cyclic AMP-Adenosine Pathway Induces Nitric Oxide Synthesis in Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 296 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, and E. K. Jackson
Adenosine Inhibits Growth of Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Via A2B Receptors
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 516 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, E. K. Jackson, and P. J. Keller
17{beta}-Estradiol, Its Metabolites, and Progesterone Inhibit Cardiac Fibroblast Growth
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubey, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubey, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, E. K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH