Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:3021-3029

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, M. E.

(Circulation. 1997;96:3021-3029.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Adjunctive Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Slow Pathway Ablation in Human Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Anatomic Insights

Westby G. Fisher, MD; Michael A. Pelini, MD; ; Martin E. Bacon, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, National Naval Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Because of the inability of fluoroscopy to image intracardiac structures, the precise anatomic location of successful slow pathway (SP) ablation is controversial. We hypothesized that adjunctive intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in concert with conventional fluoroscopy and electrogram guidance could identify the anatomic site of successful SP ablation.

Methods and Results In 25 patients, radiofrequency ablation was performed in the triangle of Koch directed by biplane fluoroscopy and a 6.2F, 12.5-MHz ICE catheter positioned adjacent to the triangle of Koch. Persistent SP conduction, number of radiofrequency applications, presence of junctional tachycardia, and fluoroscopy times were evaluated. As demonstrated by ICE, anterograde SP ablation was achieved between 2 and 7 mm from the tricuspid valve in imaging planes containing the AV muscular septum in all cases. Radiofrequency energy applications applied at other sites within the triangle of Koch failed to interrupt SP conduction. A mean of three radiofrequency energy applications (3±2; range, 1 to 12) successfully ablated all evidence of anterograde SP conduction in all patients studied. Junctional tachycardia was seen in 96% (71/74) of the radiofrequency energy applications.

Conclusions Radiofrequency ablation at the tricuspid valve's insertion into the AV muscular septum as identified by ICE reliably terminates anterograde SP conduction, supporting the hypothesis that the SP consistently traverses this anatomic location.


Key Words: atrioventricular node • catheter ablation • echocardiography • electrophysiology


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
During AV nodal modification, the positioning of the ablation catheter is guided by fluoroscopic imaging combined with interpretation of electrogram morphology.1–9 However, fluoroscopy cannot directly visualize endocardial structures, and a solely electrogram-guided approach to slow pathway AV nodal modification is neither sensitive nor specific for identifying an effective ablation site.10 ICE has demonstrated utility in imaging ablation catheter position, stability, and lesion formation during RF ablation.11–13 Chu et al11 described the use of ICE for slow pathway modification in two patients. Because of their limited number of patients and difficulty imaging more anterior cardiac structures near the triangle of Koch due to their use of a nondeflectable ICE catheter, sufficient data regarding the anatomic location of successful slow pathway ablation are not available.

In the present study, the anatomic location of successful and unsuccessful ablation sites as imaged by ICE during conventional slow pathway modification of typical AVNRT was studied with small, nondeflectable 6.2F, 12.5-MHz ICE catheters angled through long vascular sheaths to image structures near the triangle of Koch.14 We hypothesized that ICE catheters directed through preformed long vascular sheaths would identify the effective anatomic ablation location during slow pathway modification for typical AVNRT and that the effective site would be adjacent to the tricuspid annulus. To test these hypotheses, a series of prospectively enrolled patients with typical AVNRT undergoing conventional fluoroscopic and electrogram-guided slow pathway AV nodal modification were studied with adjunctive ICE to anatomically define the effective ablation sites. Ablation characteristics, including safety, electrograms and fluoroscopic locations at the successful site, presence of residual slow pathway conduction, and follow-up, were evaluated.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Twenty-five consecutive patients (11 women, 14 men; mean age, 43±18 years) undergoing electrophysiological study for typical AVNRT were prospectively enrolled, and informed consent was obtained under a protocol approved by the Investigational Review Board at the National Naval Medical Center.

Electrophysiological Study
Quadrapolar catheters were placed in the high right atrium, right ventricular apex, and His bundle positions from the femoral veins under fluoroscopic guidance. A decapolar coronary sinus catheter was placed via the left subclavian vein. ECG leads I, II, aVF, and V1 and intracardiac electrograms were recorded on a MIDAS system (Electronics for Medicine). The stimulation protocol consisted of atrial and ventricular incremental pacing and extrastimulation. Dual AV nodal physiology was confirmed by conventional criteria (>=50-ms increase in H1-H2 interval for a 10-ms decrease in A1-A2). Isoproterenol was administered to patients without inducible tachycardia at baseline. AVNRT was confirmed by ventricular extrastimulus testing during tachycardia when the His bundle was refractory. Reproducible tachycardia induction was confirmed before ablation.

ICE Procedure
ICE was performed with a 6.2F, 12.5-MHz blunt-tipped Sonicath catheter (Boston Scientific Corp) paired with a Hewlett-Packard SONOS 2000, model 2400A ultrasound system. The ICE catheter was inserted into a 60-cm SL2 sheath (Daig Corp) placed in the left femoral vein, permitting direction of the ICE catheter to the triangle of Koch. As the ICE catheter was withdrawn from the right ventricular outflow tract to the coronary sinus ostium, imaging was performed in planes perpendicular to the interatrial and interventricular septa (Fig 1Down). ICE images were recorded on videotape with an audio soundtrack. Care was taken to image the ablation catheter tip by orienting the ICE catheter parallel with and in close proximity to the ablation catheter before each energy application with both ICE and biplane fluoroscopy. ICE measurements were made with an on-line measurement package. The diameter of the coronary sinus ostium was measured at the level of the thebesian valve. Imaging planes were categorized as A, B, C, or D (Fig 1Down). Plane A was defined by the presence of the coronary sinus ostium, fossa ovalis, or both. Plane B was defined by the presence of the AV muscular septum and the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve without visualization of the membranous septum or the coronary sinus. Plane C was defined by the presence of the membranous and muscular interventricular septa without the AV muscular septum. The plane incorporating both the AV muscular septum and a portion of the membranous septum was designated BC (Fig 2CDown) because it was intermediate between planes B and C. Plane D was defined by the presence of the right ventricular outflow tract. Catheter stability was assessed by ICE and recorded for each ablation location. The distance of the ablation catheter tip from the insertion of the tricuspid leaflet into the tricuspid annulus was measured in each imaging plane.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. ICE imaging during pullback from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) to level of coronary sinus (CS) ostium. Relative positions of ICE imaging planes are illustrated in schematic. Pullback imaging was performed from anterior to posterior (planes D to A) at imaging depth of 40 mm. Small circle in center of each ICE image is created by ICE catheter. Depth markings at 5-mm intervals radiate from ICE catheter artifact. Images were rotated with software control so that superior (S) structures were at top of image, inferior structures (I) were at bottom of image, left-side structures (L) to left, and right-side structures (R) to right. A, ICE image at level of midsection of CS ostium. CS is seen inferior to most anterior portion of fossa ovalis (FO). Anterior (rightward) and posterior (leftward) tricuspid valve (TV) leaflets separate right atrium (RA) and ventricle (RV). B, ICE image at level of atrioventricular muscular septum (AVMS). Posterior leaflet of TV inserts into AVMS and is offset from insertion of posterior mitral valve (MV) leaflet into central fibrous body of heart. Successful slow pathway ablation was achieved in atrium immediately adjacent to TV at this level. C, ICE image at level of membranous septum. Aortic valve leaflets are clearly seen (Ao) superior and to left of interventricular membranous septum (Mem). Interventricular membranous septum joins with wider interventricular muscular septum (Musc) more anteriorly and superiorly (see also Fig 7Up). At this level, anterior (Ant.) MV leaflet is seen with its most septal insertion occurring to left of aortic valve. D, ICE image in RVOT. In some patients, pulmonic valve (PV) could be faintly seen at periphery of image. Hypoechoic image shadowing was seen when shaft of diagnostic electrophysiological catheters entered imaging plane, whereas electrodes on these catheters caused a hyperechoic spray artifact (see Fig 2CUp). IVC indicates inferior vena cava; EuV, Eustachian valve; and TT, tendon of Todaro.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Anterior ablation location defined by RAO fluoroscopic images at successful ablation site (fluoroscopy location A-M: see "Methods"). Fluoroscopic views, ICE image, and endocardial electrograms were obtained simultaneously. A, 45° RAO fluoroscopic image of successful ablation site. ICE catheter courses nearly parallel to and adjacent to ablation catheter with aide of long preformed sheath. Despite apparent proximity of ablation catheter tip to His catheter in RAO view, ICE disclosed ablation tip to be 14 mm from His bundle catheter and 8 mm from most anterior portion of AV muscular septum. B, 45° LAO projection of catheters shown in A. C, ICE images obtained simultaneously from ICE catheter as positioned in A and B. Hyperechoic reflectance artifact from ablation catheter tip is seen as it contacts AV muscular septum (AVMS) slightly inferior and posterior to membranous AV septum (adjacent to His catheter). Because a portion of membranous and muscular AV septum is imaged by ICE, this site represented ICE imaging plane BC (see "Methods"). D, Intracardiac electrograms simultaneously acquired from catheters shown. A 1-mV calibration pulse (*) is shown. Distal tip of anterior mitral valve (MV) leaflet was also seen. HRA indicates high right atrium; His, His bundle; RVA, right ventricular apex; CS, coronary sinus; Abl, ablation catheter; Dist, distal; Prox, proximal; and sheath, SL2 long sheath.

Catheter Ablation
RF ablation was performed with a 4-mm–tip standard curve steerable catheter (EP Technologies) that was passed through an SR0 long sheath (Daig Corp) placed in the right femoral vein. The ablation catheter tip was positioned in the midseptal region of the tricuspid annulus by use of biplane fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopic angulations were standardized to the 45° RAO and 45° LAO projections. Fluoroscopic images of the successful ablation sites were recorded cineradiographically and classified on the basis of the anterior, middle, and posterior thirds of the septum as measured between the His bundle catheter and coronary sinus catheter in a scheme proposed by Jazayeri et al.3 Ablation catheter tip location was similarly recorded for LAO projections. Therefore, the final successful fluoroscopic location was recorded as a two-letter code, with the first letter (A, M, or P) denoting the anterior, middle, or posterior third of the distance between the His bundle and coronary sinus catheters in the RAO view and the second letter (A, M, or P) denoting the LAO positioning. The catheter tip was localized by advancing or withdrawing the ultrasound catheter until the characteristic bright hyperechoic reflectance artifact of the ablation catheter tip electrode just entered the ultrasound imaging plane.11,13 Catheter stability was assessed with both fluoroscopy and ICE imaging. ICE documented catheter stability by noting when the distal ablation catheter tip moved in concert with the endocardial surface before each RF energy application. If catheter stability was not obtainable, then a different ablation catheter or sheath was used before application of RF energy. RF energy was administered in a unipolar fashion with 20 to 30 W for 10 to 60 seconds via either a Radionics RFG-33 RF Lesion Generator System or an EPT 1000 Cardiac Ablation Controller. After each RF energy application, repeat attempts were made to induce AVNRT. After 30 minutes, repeat atrial and ventricular extrastimuli were administered to assess for evidence of dual AV nodal physiology or inducible AVNRT. If more than one AV nodal echo beat was identified, further RF applications were performed. Otherwise, the study was terminated.

Data Collection
In addition to the ultrasound-measured catheter positions from the tricuspid annulus, tachycardia cycle length, fast and slow pathway effective refractory periods preablation and postablation, presence or absence of junctional tachycardia with each RF application, the presence of AV or VA block during the RF applications, the time from the His bundle atrial electrogram to the distal ablation catheter bipolar electrogram (AHis-AAbl), total number of RF applications, the ratio of atrial to ventricular electrogram amplitudes, catheter stability at each ablation site, presence or absence of visible lesions (and their sizes), coronary sinus ostium diameter at the level of the thebesian valve, and the fluoroscopic catheter position at the successful ablation site were recorded.

Statistical Analysis
For comparison of differences between groups, a {chi}2 test was used for discontinuous variables. Results are expressed as mean±SD. A value of P<.05 was considered significant. Correlations were performed with a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient with Sigmastat software version 1.01 (Jandel Scientific).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Intracardiac Ultrasound Imaging
Using the 12.5-MHz ICE catheter, the image region extended up to 40 mm radially from the ultrasound catheter in all patients. The SL2 long sheath permitted the ICE catheter to be directed anteriorly and medially toward the central fibrous body of the heart (Fig 1Up). From this position, structures within and near the triangle of Koch were well visualized. The parallel orientation of the ICE catheter to the ablation catheter allowed direct imaging of the ablation catheter tip during all energy applications (Figs 2AUp, 2BUp, 3ADown, and 3BDown). Catheter shafts without metallic electrodes caused an acoustic shadowing artifact that obscured imaging beyond the shaft. The platinum electrodes on the catheters caused a hyperacoustic "spray" artifact, with the largest artifact produced by the large 4-mm ablation catheter tip electrode (Figs 2CUp and 3CDown). Imaging during RF energy delivery with the Radionics RF generator did not interfere with image quality, but the EPT RF generator system caused significant distortion of the ICE image during RF energy delivery in patient 4 and was abandoned for all subsequent patients.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Fluoroscopically defined midseptal ablation location at successful ablation site (fluoroscopy site M-P: see "Methods"). Figure labels and views are identical to Fig 2Up. Ablation catheter tip appears fluoroscopically more posterior in position than in Fig 2Up and demonstrates tricuspid valve's insertion to AVMS in more posterior location as localized by ICE. Note, this site is 15 mm from mitral valve's insertion to central fibrous body of heart and similar to Fig 2Up distance from His bundle catheter (14 mm). Because neither membranous septum nor coronary sinus is imaged by ICE (C), this defines ICE imaging plane B (see "Methods").

Ablation Results
Successful Ablation Site Locations
The ablation catheter tip position at the onset of RF energy delivery is demonstrated in Table 1Down. Fifteen energy applications were performed in the imaging plane at the AV septum just posterior to the membranous septum (imaging plane BC, Fig 2Up), 43 in the imaging plane of the AV muscular septum anterior to the coronary sinus and posterior to the membranous septum (imaging plane B, Fig 3Up), and 16 applications between the tricuspid annulus and coronary sinus (imaging plane A). Successful slow pathway ablation was achieved between 2 and 7 mm from the tricuspid annulus with the catheter overlying the AV muscular septum in imaging plane B or BC in all patients (Fig 4Down). All energy applications placed between the coronary sinus and the tricuspid annulus (imaging plane A) failed to terminate slow pathway conduction, regardless of proximity to the tricuspid annulus. All sites closer than 2 mm from the insertion of the tricuspid valve leaflet to the annulus dislodged into the right ventricle during energy application and were ineffective. ICE also disclosed significant anatomic variability in the maximal diameter of the coronary sinus (16±5 mm; range, 7 to 25 mm).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Radiofrequency Energy Applications



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Location of ablation catheter tip electrode at initiation of each successful and unsuccessful RF energy application. Ordinate represents distance from distal ablation catheter tip to junction of tricuspid valve leaflet to tricuspid annulus; abscissa represents ICE imaging plane in which distance was measured. Successful energy applications are denoted by solid circles and unsuccessful sites by open circles. No energy applications were administered in ICE imaging planes C or D (not shown).

Lesion Formation
Visible lesions were identified in 9 of 25 patients (36%) and averaged 6±2 mm. All of the lesions had relatively hyperechoic borders but varied slightly in appearance among patients: 5 lesions had a hyperechoic border with a central pit from the ablation catheter (Figs 5Down and 6Down), 2 without a visible pit, and 1 lesion consisted of multiple micropits from which the ablation catheter appeared to have "bounced" on the myocardial surface. Six visible lesions occurred at the AV muscular septum within 4±2 mm (range, 2 to 7 mm) of the insertion of the tricuspid valve and were uniformly effective at terminating slow pathway conduction. Three lesions measuring 6 to 8 mm placed between the coronary sinus and tricuspid annulus were each ineffective at terminating the patients' tachycardia (Fig 6Down). In those lesions that were visible, the sizes of the effective lesions (6±3 mm) were not significantly different from the ineffective lesions (6±2 mm).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Example of an RF lesion created after single application of 30 W for 30 seconds as visualized before and after application with a 6.2F, 12.5-MHz ICE catheter. Preablation imaging was performed at imaging radius of 60 mm. Ablation catheter tip (Abl) is recognized by its characteristic hyperechoic reflectance artifact. Catheter was seen in stable contact with endocardial surface adjacent to insertion of tricuspid valve (TV) into AV muscular septum (ICE imaging plane B, see "Methods"). RF energy application was discontinued because of visualization of lesion developing adjacent to ablation catheter tip. After ablation, ablation catheter was withdrawn and lesion visualized with a slightly magnified imaging radius of 40 mm. Lesion measured 11 mm and was characterized by circumferential hyperechoic border surrounding a small pit in endocardial surface. Some swelling of endocardial surface extended to tricuspid valve's insertion into AV muscular septum. No residual slow pathway conduction after this single application of RF energy was noted. His indicates His bundle catheter; L, left; R, right; S, superior; and I, inferior.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Example of unsuccessful lesion placed posteriorly between coronary sinus ostium (CS) and tricuspid annulus (ICE imaging plane A, see "Methods") after application of 25 W for 42 seconds. Presence of 8-mm lesion with hyperechoic border surrounding a central pit (arrow) suggested adequate tissue heating, yet typical AVNRT persisted. RV indicates right ventricle; TV, tricuspid valve.

In four patients, visualization of a significant hyperechoic lesion prompted discontinuation of RF energy delivery. The largest visualized lesion (11 mm) was identified in patient 1 after 30 W was applied for 30 seconds (Fig 5Up). Because of the size of this lesion and its proximity to the compact AV node (15 mm from the His bundle catheter), all other lesions in subsequent patients were applied at 20 to 25 W power. In no patient in whom a visible lesion was identified involving the tissue overlying the insertion of the tricuspid valve into the AV muscular septum was persistent slow pathway conduction found after ablation.

Catheter Stability
ICE permitted demonstration of movement of the ablation catheter tip from its initial position during RF energy delivery. Of the 74 RF energy applications, only 37 (50%) achieved constant tissue contact throughout energy application (Table 1Up). Of the unstable catheter appearances, catheter "bouncing" or "slipping" near the initial placement site was the most common movement seen (25 of 74 applications, 34%), followed by dislodgment of the catheter tip into the coronary sinus (16 of 74 applications, 22%) or tricuspid valve (7 of 74 applications, 9%). Coronary sinus migration was always seen on LAO fluoroscopic images and on ICE by loss of the ablation catheter tip artifact from the ultrasound imaging plane. Catheter "bouncing" or migration into the right ventricle (with the ablation catheter tip over the tricuspid valve) was not appreciated by fluoroscopy.

Junctional Tachycardia
Junctional tachycardia was seen in 71 of 74 RF applications (96%). Stable catheter positioning on the atrial aspect of the tricuspid annulus over the AV muscular septum resulted in continuous junctional tachycardia, whereas intermittent junctional tachycardia occurred when the catheter tip "bounced" on the myocardial surface or dislodged anteriorly into the right ventricle or posteriorly into the coronary sinus (Table 1Up). Seven RF energy applications were terminated prematurely by the operator because of concern about the rapid nature of the junctional tachycardia without sequelae. Three RF applications (4%) failed to precipitate junctional tachycardia: ultrasound imaging disclosed that two were applied with the ablation catheter tip on the tricuspid valve leaflet and one was applied before the catheter was stabilized against the myocardium and resulted in microbubble formation. Each of these three applications occurred despite apparently adequate electrogram and fluoroscopic appearances of the catheter placement.

Electrophysiological and Procedural Data
The patients' electrophysiological variables are outlined in Table 2Down. Although no anterograde slow pathway conduction was present after ablation in any patient, one patient (patient 9) had evidence of persistent single atypical AV nodal echoes after ablation. This same patient had evidence of both typical and atypical forms of AVNRT before ablation. There was no difference between preablation and postablation AH intervals in patients after slow pathway modification. At the successful ablation site, the average A:V electrogram amplitude ratio was 0.29±0.15 and the AHis-Abl was 35±10 ms. However, in the evaluation of all the RF energy application electrograms, no significant correlation existed between the measured A:V electrogram ratio and the measured distance of the ablation catheter tip to the tricuspid valve as visualized by ICE (Table 1Up, r=-.083, P=.48).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patient Demographics, Electrophysiological Findings, and Procedural Variables

Six of 74 RF lesions (8%) resulted in retrograde VA block during application of RF energy. Two patients developed transient first-degree AV block after cessation of the RF energy, but this resolved in <10 minutes after the RF application and in both patients was preceded by VA block. The AHis-AAbl intervals in these two RF energy applications were 10 and 20 ms, respectively, and occurred in ultrasound imaging plane BC. Both patients had inducible AVNRT after these episodes.

Complications and Follow-up
No procedural complications or episodes of complete heart block occurred. No clinical recurrence of typical AVNRT has occurred after a mean of 11.0±3.4 months.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This is the first study using ICE in vivo to systematically image the anatomic sites of ablation during AV nodal modification in humans. ICE provided clear visualization of the septal structures within the triangle of Koch. Successful slow pathway ablation was uniformly achieved when RF energy was applied in close proximity to the insertion of the tricuspid leaflet into the AV muscular septum. Ablation sites >7 mm posterior to the tricuspid annulus within the triangle of Koch did not result in interruption of the AVNRT circuit. Although the area of the tricuspid annulus has previously been suggested as the effective site for RF ablation of the slow pathway,1–4,6,15 ICE confirmed the importance of targeting periannular cells over the AV muscular septum to achieve success.

Previous investigators have suggested that slow pathway ablation can occur from within the coronary sinus.1,2,6 Our data do not exclude the possibility that such sites may also result in successful ablation. However, lesions applied between the coronary sinus and tricuspid annulus in the present study were uniformly ineffective at achieving slow pathway ablation, even when visible lesions were identified with ICE. It is possible that lesions placed within the coronary sinus in other studies interrupted a separate portion of the AV nodal reentrant circuit, encompassed all posterior inputs to the AV junctional cells, directly incorporated tricuspid annular cells because of larger lesions from the higher ablation energies administered, or altered slow pathway conduction sufficiently to preclude sustained reentry.

Lesion Development
ICE disclosed identifiable lesions in 9 of 74 RF applications (12%). Changes in tissue characteristics after ablation were difficult to appreciate in the majority of lesions imaged with the 12.5-MHz ICE transducer. Cardiac motion, episodes of ablation catheter instability, and low ablation energies may have contributed to the inability to identify discrete lesions. However, identification of a lesion over the AV muscular septum adjacent to the tricuspid annulus reliably correlated with complete elimination of slow pathway conduction. The small size of visible lesions after effective ablation suggests that periannular atrial cells over the AV muscular septum play an important role in slow pathway conduction.

A:V Electrogram Amplitude Ratio
As seen in other studies, a small A:V electrogram amplitude ratio was noted at the effective site.3,5 Contrary to expectation, there was a poor correlation between this ratio and the distance from the ablation catheter tip to the tricuspid annulus. Factors explaining this finding include error introduced by the proximal position of the recording bipole compared with the distal ablating electrode, the interaction of the endocardial activation vector to the recording bipole vector, and the fact that left ventricular muscle lies adjacent to right atrial tissue over a broad region within the triangle of Koch (Fig 7Down).16 In addition, the proximity of the coronary sinus to the left ventricle permitted small A:V electrogram ratios to be recorded within the coronary sinus outside the triangle of Koch.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Anatomy of effective ablation site. A, Anatomic section through triangle of Koch at site of insertion of tricuspid valve into AV muscular septum (AVMS). Specimen is oriented with mitral valve (MV) to left of figure and tricuspid valve to right of figure to correspond to image obtained with ICE. Coronary sinus (CS) is posterior to plane of section. Offset of tricuspid valve's (TV) insertion into muscular septum from posterior MV leaflet's insertion into central fibrous body (CFB) is seen and defines boundaries of AV muscular septum (AVMS). Effective ablation site is represented by *. This anatomic plane corresponds to ICE imaging plane in Fig 1BUp. B, Anatomic section paralleling base of heart to demonstrate membranous AV septum. This section is {approx}10 mm anterior to section in A and courses just posterior to noncoronary cusp of aortic valve. Aorta has been removed. At this level, anterior leaflet of tricuspid valve inserts into membranous septum (Mem) and divides membranous septum into its atrioventricular and interventricular portions. This anatomic level corresponds closely to ICE image seen in Fig 1CUp (modified with permission).16 LA indicates left atrium; RA, right atrium; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; LVOT, posterior diverticulum of left ventricular outflow tract; and IVMS, interventricular muscular septum.

Catheter/Tissue Interface Assessment and Safety
The ability to directly assess catheter tip contact with endocardium most likely contributed to successful slow pathway ablation and a higher incidence of junctional tachycardia in this series compared with the fluoroscopically guided series of Epstein et al5 (119 of 181 applications, 67%) or Hintringer et al17 (172 of 540 applications, 32%). Improved assessment of the ablation catheter location may also have contributed to the fewer episodes of VA block seen in this study (6 of 74, 8%) compared with Hintringer et al (46 of 172, 26.9%, P<.002) despite similar ablation energies being used (20 to 30 W).

No episodes of inadvertent sustained first-degree or complete heart block occurred in this series of patients. However, temporary first-degree AV block lasting <10 minutes was noted after two RF applications at sites near the membranous AV septum (imaging plane BC) with evidence of unstable catheter contact. Both episodes were heralded by VA dissociation during junctional tachycardia and short AHis-AAbl intervals. These data are similar to the findings of other series in which monitoring of electrophysiological variables was important for safe slow pathway modification.15,17 Ablating in a more posterior imaging plane (ICE imaging plane B) never caused AH prolongation.

Slow Pathway Ablation
No evidence of postablation anterograde slow pathway conduction was present in any patient studied. Although complete slow pathway ablation may not be required for initial resolution of the patient's tachycardia, the presence of residual slow pathway conduction may be associated with an increased recurrence rate.18–20 Previous studies using either electrogram markers or an anatomic approach to AV nodal modification have demonstrated persistent slow pathway conduction in 7% to 64% of patients.1–4,7,8 In the present study, one patient with typical and atypical AVNRT before ablation had evidence of persistent retrograde slow pathway conduction after ablation, as evidenced by the presence of a single atypical AV nodal echo during postablation ventricular extrastimulus testing. This may have occurred because of incomplete ablation of the slow pathway with residual anterograde unidirectional block or because of the existence of more than one slow pathway input to the AV node in this patient.21

Study Limitations
With the exception of four cases, no attempt was made to target other posterior sites in the triangle of Koch. It is possible that ablation at other more posterior sites may be equally effective in terminating slow pathway conduction, particularly in patients with the uncommon form of AVNRT. However, the consistent ability to ablate anterograde slow pathway conduction at the AV muscular septum near the tricuspid annulus lends credibility to this technique and provides insight into the anatomic course of slow pathway inputs to the compact AV node.

Larger randomized series with long-term follow-up are required to assess the cost-effectiveness of this technique. Fluoroscopy remains essential for safe introduction of the ultrasound catheter into the heart and the initial placement of electrophysiological catheters.

Conclusions
ICE with a 6.2F, 12.5-MHz ICE catheter directed through a long sheath to image the region of the triangle of Koch provides a safe, effective, and novel means of anatomically defining a successful site of slow pathway ablation in patients with typical AVNRT. RF energy application directed by ICE to atrial tissue from 2 to 7 mm posterior to the insertion of the tricuspid valve into the AV muscular septum terminated anterograde slow pathway conduction in all patients. In contrast, RF energy applications delivered more posteriorly between the coronary sinus ostium and tricuspid annulus resulted in junctional tachycardia in all RF energy applications but failed to result in slow pathway ablation. Therefore, a critical portion of the slow pathway exists adjacent to the tricuspid valve overlying the AV muscular septum. Although conventional methods of targeting the slow pathway in patients with typical AVNRT are effective, adjunctive ICE may facilitate slow pathway ablation in patients with complicated cardiac or intrathoracic anatomy.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
A:V = atrial to ventricular
AVNRT = AV nodal reentrant tachycardia
ICE = intracardiac echocardiography, echocardiographic
LAO = left anterior oblique
RAO = right anterior oblique
RF = radiofrequency


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1A. (Continued)


*    Acknowledgments
 
The Chief, Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery Washington, DC, Clinical Investigation Program sponsored this study, grant B95–078. The authors would like to acknowledge Mark C.P. Haigney, MD, for his review of this manuscript and the outstanding clinical and technical support provided by HM1 David W. Neff, HM2 C. Michael Fairman, HM2 Ral S. Wheeler, HM3 John A. Sral, HM3 Richard E. Stone, HM2 Gina L. Morosky, and other members of the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory at the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md, in completion of this research project.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Westby G. Fisher, MD, Cardiac Electrophysiology Associates, 2123 Auburn Avenue, Suite 440, Cincinnati, OH 45219.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government.

Received March 5, 1997; revision received May 29, 1997; accepted June 6, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI, Oren J, Overholt ED, Lazzara R. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313–318.[Abstract]
  2. Kay GN, Epstein AE, Dailey SM, Plumb VJ. Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit. Circulation. 1992;85:1675–1688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jazayeri MR, Hempe SL, Sra JS, Dhala AA, Blanck Z, Deshpande SS, Avitall B, Krum DP, Gilbert CJ, Akhtar M. Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1992;85:1318–1328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, Commenges D, Montserrat P, d'Iversois C, Lemetayer P, Warin JF. Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation. 1992;85:2162–2175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Epstein LM, Lesh MD, Griffin JC, Lee RJ, Scheinman MM. A direct midseptal approach to slow atrioventricular nodal pathway ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995;18:57–64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kalbfleisch SJ, Strickberger SA, Williamson B, Vorperian VR, Man C, Hummel JD, Langberg JJ, Morady F. Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:716–723.[Abstract]
  7. Langberg JJ, Leon A, Borganelli M, Kalbfleisch SJ, El-Atassi R, Calkins H, Morady F. A randomized, prospective comparison of anterior and posterior approaches to radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1993;87:1551–1556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lindsay BD, Chung MK, Gamache MC, Luke RA, Schechtman KB, Osborn JL, Cain ME. Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:733–740.[Abstract]
  9. Wathen M, Natale A, Wolfe K, Yee R, Newman D, Klein G. An anatomically guided approach to atrioventricular node slow pathway ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:886–889.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Niebauer MJ, Daoud E, Williamson B, Man KC, Strickberger A, Hummel J, Morady F. Atrial electrogram characteristics in patients with and without atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1995;92:77–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chu E, Kalman JM, Kwasman MA, Jue JCY, Fitzgerald PJ, Epstein LM, Schiller NB, Yock PG, Lesh MD. Intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1351–1357.[Abstract]
  12. Chu E, Fitzpatrick AP, Chin MC, Sudhir K, Yock PG, Lesh MD. Radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Circulation. 1994;89:1301–1305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Olgin JE, Kalman JM, Fitzpatrick AP, Lesh MD. Role of right atrial endocardial structure as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter: activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;92:1839–1848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schwartz SL, Gillam LD, Weintraub AR, Sanzobrino BW, Hirst JA, Hsu T-L, Fisher JP, Marx G, Fulton D, McKay RG, Pandian NG. Intracardiac echocardiography in humans using a small-sized (6F), low frequency (12.5 MHZ) ultrasound catheter: methods, imaging planes and clinical experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:189–198.[Abstract]
  15. Thakur RK, Klein GJ, Yee R, Stites HW. Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1706–1710.[Abstract]
  16. Wilcox BR, Anderson RH. Surgical Anatomy of the Heart. 2nd ed. London, UK: Gower Medical Publishing; 1992:7.9.
  17. Hintringer F, Hartikainen J, Davies DW, Heald SC, Gill JS, Ward DE, Rowland E. Prediction of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the atrioventricular node. Circulation. 1996;92:3490–3496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tebbenjohanns J, Pfeiffer D, Shumacher B, Manz M, Lüderitz B. Impact of the local atrial electrogram in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: ablation versus modification of the slow pathway. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:245–251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Li HG, Klein GJ, Stites HW, Zardini M, Morillo CA, Thakur RK, Yee R. Elimination of slow pathway conduction: an accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1849–1853.[Abstract]
  20. Baker JH, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, Kay GN. Predictors of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry after selective slow pathway ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:765–769.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Ward DE, Garratt CJ. The substrate for atrioventricular `nodal' reentrant tachycardia: is there a 'third pathway'? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:62–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. G. Bongiorni, A. Di Cori, E. Soldati, G. Zucchelli, L. Segreti, G. Solarino, R. De Lucia, and M. Marzilli
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia using intracardiac echocardiography in pregnancy
Europace, May 6, 2008; (2008) eun120v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. D. Cheitlin, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, D. P. Faxon, L. D. Gillam, T. R. Kimball, et al.
ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE committee to update the 1997 guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 3, 2003; 42(5): 954 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. D. Cheitlin, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, D. P. Faxon, L. D. Gillam, T. R. Kimball, et al.
ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography)
Circulation, September 2, 2003; 108(9): 1146 - 1162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. W. Downing, W. A Herzog Jr, J. S. McLaughlin, and T. P. Gilbert
Beating-heart mitral valve surgery: Preliminary model and methodology
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1141 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. L. Packer, C. L. Stevens, M. G. Curley, C. J. Bruce, F. A. Miller, B. K. Khandheria, J. K. Oh, L. J. Sinak, and J. B. Seward
Intracardiac phased-array imaging: methods and initial clinical experience with high resolution, under blood visualization: Initial experience with intracardiac phased-array ultrasound
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2002; 39(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, M. E.