From the Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Academic Medical Center,
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Anton E. Becker, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Methods and ResultsIn 21 hearts obtained from autopsies, the AV
nodal septal junctional area was removed en bloc, serially sectioned,
and reconstructed. None of the hearts showed a blunt posterior ending
of the compact AV node; 13 showed posterior extensions on both the
right and left sides; 7 had a rightward posterior extension only; and 1
heart showed a single leftward extension. Hence, a rightward posterior
extension was present in 20 of 21 hearts. Furthermore, in 16 of
these 20 hearts, the rightward extension continued to the level of the
coronary sinus ostium; in 7, the bundle extended beyond this
anatomic landmark. The mean length of the right posterior extension was
4.4±2.0 mm; that of the leftward posterior extension was
1.8±0.9 mm. Superimposed onto the slope of the muscular AV
septum, viewed from the right atrium, the rightward extension ran close
to the tricuspid annulus with the leftward extension positioned
superiorly.
ConclusionsThe human compact AV node contains rightward and
leftward posterior extensions, with the right extension close to the
tricuspid annulus. It is tempting to speculate that these extensions
are involved in "slow pathway" conduction.
The present study is based on serial histological
sectioning and subsequent reconstruction of the AV septal junctional
area in human hearts, obtained from individuals without a history of AV
nodal reentrant tachycardia or paroxysmal atrial
fibrillation, and has been designed to investigate in detail the
posterior extensions of the compact node.
In each of the 21 hearts, a distinct, compact AV node was found (Fig 2A
Of these 21 hearts, 13 showed a posterior extension that was both right
and left sided; 7 hearts had a rightward posterior extension only (Fig 3
Once the compact node and both rightward and leftward extensions were
superimposed on the slope of the muscular AV septum, it immediately
became obvious that when viewed from the right atrial aspect, the
leftward extension was positioned superior to the rightward extension
(Fig 6
These extensions showed similar cellular and architectural
characteristics as those of the compact AV node. The latter has been
described as a layered structure with superficial and deep
strata6 ; others have described an additional
intermediate layer.10 In the posterior
extensions, such an additional subdivision was no longer apparent. The
cells were small and closely packed, with an interweaving architecture
(Fig 2C
It is of considerable interest, moreover, that the AV nodal-bundle axis
reached the level of the anterior margin of the os of the CS in 16 of
20 hearts. In addition, in 7 of these hearts, the axis continued even
further into the subeustachian pouch, which basically no longer
reflected AV septal junction but rather inferior free wall
junction.
Recent reviews of the anatomy of the AV conduction tissues in
electrophysiology textbooks fail to mention these
extensions,12 other than a rather vague statement
that "nodelike cells are often seen at or near the anulus of the
tricuspid, mitral and aortic valves. Some of these ... may join
the regular AV node."10 It is only in a chapter
produced by Anderson and colleagues,13 referring
to previous studies in the 1970s,5 6 that
posterior extensions are clearly mentioned and shown, albeit without
further emphasis on their potential significance. We are unaware,
moreover, of any recent original works that encompass the posterior
extensions of the compact AV node in humans. Hence, it appears as if
these structures have almost been forgotten.
Nevertheless, Tawara's 1906 epic work "Das Reitzleitungssystem des
Säugetierherzens" clearly states that a small,
parallel-oriented bundle of fibers originates from the node to run
posteriorly approximately to the anterior region of the CS, where it
connects with the usual atrial fibers.4 Tawara's
famous plates, composed of meticulously reconstructed drawings of
microscopic sections, beautifully illustrate these extensions and
actually show that Tawara himself had already noticed that these
bundles of fibers diverted rightward and leftward (see his Tafel I
Menschenherz No. 136 and No. 143).
In our studies in 1975,5 6 we confirmed the
existence of two distinct contributing segments to the compact node.
Both approached the compact node from beneath the mouth of the CS,
closely adherent to the fibrous annulus (see Becker and
Anderson,6 Fig 8, page 272), being divergent
posteriorly, but anteriorly both merged with the half oval of compact
nodal cells. They probably represent the deep and superficial
nodal segments described by Truex and
Smythe.14 15 16 The observation of a posterior
tract in close proximity to the tricuspid annulus raised discussions
concerning whether those extensions represented a tract of
cells described by James17 and considered to run
from the posterior "internodal tract" to the His bundle, thus
bypassing the compact AV node. We refuted this concept at the time, and
our present extended observations endorse this viewpoint. The
extensions always originated from the posterior aspect of the compact
AV node and never from the anterior part or from the His bundle.
It is a bit embarrassing that the discussions concerning the
possibility of AV nodal bypass tracts at the time took away further
interest in the potential significance of these peculiar extensions. It
is because of more recent
electrophysiological studies in humans,
particularly those related to AV nodal reentrant
tachycardias, that interest has been revived. It has been
shown that part of the reentrant circuit is likely to be a slow
pathway. In addition, the area to ablate this slow pathway is
considered to be underneath or slightly anterior to and below the
anterior margin of the mouth of the CS.7 8 9 Thus
far, however, a true pathway has not been shown, either
electrophysiologically or
morphologically.
In an experimental study performed in isolated, blood-perfused
porcine and canine hearts, designed to identify the origin of double
potentials in Koch's triangle, McGuire and
colleagues18 provided evidence that the
low-frequency component that followed a large-amplitude, high-frequency
component was caused by depolarization of nodal or conduction-type
tissue. They suggested that this tissue could represent the
anatomic substrate of the slow AV nodal pathway. This concept was
endorsed by the fact that the site of their recordings
coincided with the site of the slow pathway, as demonstrated by mapping
and ablation studies in humans.7 8 9 19 20 21 It is
of considerable interest, therefore, that the compact AV node and its
posterior extensions, once superimposed onto the slope of the muscular
AV septum within the confines of Koch's triangle, colocalize with the
sites of double potential recordings and with the area of slow
pathway ablation. Our anatomic observations suggest, therefore, that
the posterior extensions could take part in the reentrant circuit in
patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. If so, and if
the posterior extensions do represent the anatomic substrate
for a slow pathway defined
electrophysiologically, the implication is
that the slow AV nodal pathway basically fits within the natural
variability of an anatomically normal compact AV node.
Developmental Considerations
Our present observations thus appear to be endorsed by the current
concepts of AV conduction development.
Study Limitations
It is our opinion, therefore, that the posterior extensions of the
compact AV node in humans could provide part of the reentrant circuit
of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, although we readily
admit that we have no definitive proof for such a statement.
Nevertheless, it is a tempting concept, particularly because it could
take further research into mechanisms underlying AV nodal reentrant
tachycardia away from attempts to identify an "abnormal
pathway."
Received July 7, 1997;
revision received September 18, 1997;
accepted September 25, 1997.
2.
Koch W. Weiter Mitteilungen uber den Sinusknoten des
Herzens. Verh Dtsch Pathol Gessellsch. 1909;13:8592.
3.
Ueng KC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Lee SH, Chiou CW,
Wen ZC, Tseng CJ, Chen YJ, Yu WC, Chen CY, Chang MS. Dimension and
related anatomical distance of Koch's triangle in patients with
atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:10171023.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Tawara S. Das Reitzleitungssystem des
Säugetierherzens: Eine anatomisch-histologische Studie über
das Atrioventrikularbündel und die Purkinjeschen
Fäden. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer; 1906:135136.
5.
Anderson RH, Becker AE, Brechenmacher C, Davies MJ,
Rossi L. The human atrioventricular junctional area: a
morphological study of the A-V node and bundle. Eur J
Cardiol. 1975;3:1125.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Becker AE, Anderson RH. Morphology of the human
atrioventricular junctional area. In: Wellens HJJ, Lie
KI, Janse MJ, eds. The Conduction System of the Heart: Structure,
Function, and Clinical Implications. Leiden, Germany: HE Stenfert
Kroese BV; 1976:263286.
7.
Kay GN, Epstein AE, Dailey SM, Plumb VJ. Selective
radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of
atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia: evidence for involvement of perinodal
myocardium within the reentrant circuit.
Circulation. 1992;85:16751688.
8.
Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, Commenges D,
Montserrat P, d'Ivernois C, Lemetayer P, Warin J-F. Elimination of
atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide
application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation. 1992;85:21622175.
9.
Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday
KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Twidale N, Hazlitt A, Prior MI, Oren J,
Overholt ED, Lazarra R. Treatment of supraventricular
tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal
reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction.
N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313318.[Abstract]
10.
Bharati S, Lev M. Anatomy of the normal
conduction system, disease-related changes, and their relationship to
arrhythmogenesis. In: Podrid PJ, Kowey PR, eds. Cardiac
Arrhythmias, Mechanism, Diagnosis and Management.
Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1995:115.
11.
Anderson RH, Ho SY, Gillette PC, Becker AE. Mahaim,
Kent and abnormal atrioventricular conduction.
Cardiovasc Res. 1996;31:480491.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Bharati S, Lev M. Morphology of sinus and
atrioventricular nodes and their innervation. In:
Mazgalev T, Dreifus LS, Michelson EL, eds. Electrophysiology of
the Sinoatrial and Atrioventricular Nodes. New
York, NY: Alan R. Liss, Inc; 1988:314.
13.
Anderson RH, Ho SY, Wharton J, Becker AE. Gross
anatomy and microscopy of the conducting system. In: Mandel WJ,
ed. Cardiac Arrhythmias: Their Mechanisms, Diagnosis and
Management. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co;
1995:1354.
14.
Truex RC, Smythe MQ. Recent observations on the human
cardiac conduction system, with special considerations of the
atrioventricular node and bundle. In: Taccardi B,
Marchetti G, eds. Electrophysiology of the Heart. Oxford,
UK: Pergamon Press; 1965:177198.
15.
Truex RC. Anatomical configurations of the human
atrioventricular junction. In: Dreifus LS, Likoff W,
eds. Mechanisms and Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.
New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1966:333340.
16.
Truex RC, Smythe MQ. Reconstruction of the human
atrioventricular node. Anat Rec. 1967;158:1120.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
James TN. Morphology of the human
atrioventricular node with remarks pertinent to its
electrophysiology. Am Heart J. 1961;62:756771.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
McGuire MA, de Bakker JMT, Vermeulen JT, Opthof T,
Becker AE, Janse MJ. Origin and significance of double potentials near
the atrioventricular node: correlation of extracellular
potentials, intracellular potentials and histology.
Circulation. 1994;89:23512360.
19.
Sung RJ, Waxman HL, Saksena S, Juma Z. Sequence of
retrograde atrial activation in patients with dual
atrioventricular nodal pathways.
Circulation. 1981;64:10591067.
20.
Ross DL, Johnson DC, Denniss AR, Cooper MJ, Richards
DA, Uther JB. Curative surgery for atrioventricular
junctional (`AV nodal') reentrant tachycardia.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:13831392.[Abstract]
21.
McGuire MA, Bourke JP, Robotin MC, Johnson DC,
Medrum-Hanna W, Nunn GR, Uther JB, Ross DL. High resolution mapping of
Koch's triangle using sixty electrodes in humans with
atrioventricular junctional (`AV nodal') reentrant
tachycardia. Circulation. 1993;88(pt
1):23152328.
22.
Moorman AF, de Jong F, Lamers WH. Development of the
conduction system of the heart. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.
1997;20(pt II):20872092.
23.
Anderson RH, Davies MJ, Becker AE.
Atrioventricular ring specialized tissue in the normal
heart. Eur J Cardiol. 1974;2:219230.
24.
Gamache MC, Bharati S, Lev M, Lindsay BD.
Histopathological study following catheter guided radiofrequency
current ablation of the slow pathway in a patient with
atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:247251.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Olgin JE, Ursell P, Kao AK, Lesh MD. Pathological
findings following slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentrant
tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:625631.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Ho SY, McComb JM, Scott CD, Anderson RH. Morphology of
the cardiac conduction system in patients with
electrophysiologically proven dual
atrioventricular nodal pathways. J
Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:504512.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Posterior Extensions of the Human Compact Atrioventricular Node
A Neglected Anatomic Feature of Potential Clinical Significance
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
BackgroundCatheter ablation
procedures have revived interest in the detailed anatomy of the
specialized atrioventricular (AV) septal junctional
area. The compact AV node usually is considered to have a blunt
posterior end. The objective of this study was to reconstruct the human
compact AV node in relation to the landmarks of Koch's triangle, with
emphasis on its posterior extension.
Key Words: atrioventricular node arrhythmia electrophysiology reentry tachycardia ablation
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Catheter ablation
procedures, particularly those for AV nodal reentrant
tachycardia, have led to a renewed interest in the detailed
morphology of the AV node and its atrial inputs.1
In this context, the precise positioning of the AV node is increasingly
important. It is generally acknowledged that the human AV node is
located in the triangle of Koch,2 delineated by
the eustachian ridge or sinus septum (which harbors the tendon of
Todaro), the membranous septum (as part of the central fibrous body),
and the line of attachment of the septal leaflet of the tricuspid
valve. The dimensions of Koch's triangle, however, vary considerably
from one individual to another,3 which is
clinically relevant in the case of catheter ablation procedures in this
area that are guided largely by anatomic landmarks. In this context, it
is of considerable interest that most clinical investigators are
accustomed to consider the compact part of the AV node as a structure
with a blunt posterior end. This ignores the fact that as early as
1906, Tawara described posterior extensions of the
node,4 an observation endorsed by our own studies
in 1975.5 6 These posterior extensions have not
received much attention since that time, and it seems almost as if they
have been forgotten completely. In light of the revived interest in the
electrophysiological characteristics of the
AV septal junctional area, this could turn out to be a critical
omission. For instance, in patients with AV nodal reentrant
tachycardia, a "slow pathway" is considered part of the
reentrant circuit, and catheter ablation near the coronary
sinus (CS) orifice is the most favored and highly successful
approach.7 8 9 Thus far, however, no one has shown
such a pathway electrophysiologically, and
a morphological substrate for a slow pathway has not been traced
either. Hence, the question arises whether posterior extensions of the
compact AV node could serve as potential candidates.
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The present study is based on 21 hearts obtained at autopsy;
none of the patients had a history of persistent
supraventricular arrhythmia. All hearts were fixed
in 4% formalin. Before the microscopic investigations of the AV node,
we measured the length of Koch's triangle by taking the distance
between the membranous septum and the widest part of the mouth of the
CS. Thereafter, the AV septal junctional area was removed en bloc,
which included the anterior part of the os of the CS. When considered
necessary, the adjoining posterior tissue blocks were also taken. The
block of tissue containing the full length of Koch's triangle was then
carefully cut into parallel slices of 5-mm thickness each (Fig 1
). All slices were embedded and serially
sectioned at 10 µm thickness. Initially, every 20th section was
stained with either hematoxylin-eosin or a trichrome stain. This
allowed the recognition of the compact AV node and posterior extensions
as a first step. Thereafter, the sections in between were mounted and
stained to achieve a full reconstruction related to the anatomic
landmarks of Koch's triangle. The actual length of AV nodal tissues
was calculated from the microscopic sections, which also allowed a
reconstruction of the AV nodal tissues in relation to the length of
Koch's triangle. For each heart, the results are expressed as the
mean±SD. Correlations between two parameters were assessed
by the method of Spearman.

View larger version (132K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Opened right side of the heart with the membranous
septum transilluminated. The block of tissue removed for
histological serial sectioning is shown. It contains
Koch's triangle and, for the purpose of this diagram, has been divided
into three parallel slices. The area posterior to the os of the
coronary sinus (CS), which is the subeustachian pouch (
) and
represents AV free wall junction, has been removed en bloc,
also if considered necessary. The dotted line represents the
annular attachments of the septal tricuspid valve leaflet. ER indicates
eustachian ridge.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
There were 15 male and 6 female hearts, taken from patients
ranging in age from 31 to 84 years (mean age, 56.2 years). Heart
weights ranged from 380 to 640 g, with a mean weight of 471
g. The mean length of Koch's triangle was 24.6±4.6 mm.
Structural heart disease was found in 5 hearts; old or recurrent
myocardial infarction in 3; and aortic stenosis in 2. The major
cause of death was lung disease in 9 patients, malignant disease in 5,
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in 3, heart failure in 3, and sepsis
in 2.
). As anticipated, the compact node was
positioned on the right side of the septal slope of the muscular
component of the AV septum. Anteriorly, the compact node could be
traced into the penetrating (His) bundle before it ran out of the block
of tissue. The compact node was characterized by a complex architecture
of interweaving cells. In most instances, a deep stratum was
identified, immediately resting on and partially buried into the
connective tissue of the central fibrous body, composed of small
interlacing cells. In such instances, a superficial stratum was
present, although without a distinct delineation from the deep
stratum, composed of latticelike bundles of cells. However, the
distinction between deep and superficial layers was not always readily
identifiable. The compact node was covered on its right atrial aspect
by a transitional cell zone. The posterior extensions described herein
were direct continuations of the compact node, whereas a further
subdivision into deep and superficial strata was no longer present.
In fact, posterior extensions were composed of tightly packed, small
cells, occasionally with a marked nodelike arrangement, and were
identified as discrete posterior continuations of the compact AV node.
In case of a leftward and rightward extension, the site of origin was
readily recognized. In case of a sole leftward or rightward extension,
the site of origin was identified as the site where the posterior
continuation of the compact AV node veered away from the middle part,
either to the left or the right. Each of these 21 hearts contained a
posterior extension, which originated from the compact AV node (Fig 2B
to 2D); none of the hearts had a compact AV node with a blunt posterior
ending. The cellular component makeup was like that of the compact
node.

View larger version (159K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Composite showing the histology of the AV node and
its posterior extensions. A, The compact AV node (arrows) resting on
the slope of the muscular AV septum. B, A section close to the mouth of
the os of the coronary sinus, showing the leftward (L) and
rightward extensions (R), both of which are encircled. C and D, Higher
magnifications of the leftward and rightward extensions (arrows),
respectively. Hematoxylin-eosin stains. Bar=1 mm.
), whereas only 1 heart showed a sole
leftward extension (Fig 4
). A
diagrammatic survey is provided in Fig 5
.

View larger version (158K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Micrographs of a heart specimen with a rightward
(tricuspid) posterior extension from the compact node only. A, Cross
section immediately anterior to the mouth of the coronary
sinus; the rightward posterior extension is encircled. Note its close
proximity to the tricuspid valve (TV) attachment. The central fibrous
body (CFB) and mitral valve (MV) are indicated. B, The posterior
extension at higher magnification (between arrows). Beyond this level,
the nodal axis gradually merged with ordinary working
myocardium and eventually could no longer be distinguished.
RA indicates right atrium. Hematoxylin-eosin stains. Bar=1
mm.

View larger version (159K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Micrographs of the heart with a leftward posterior
extension only. A, Cross section through the compact part of the node
(arrows), positioned on the slope of the muscular AV septum (asterisk).
B, At a level more posterior and closer to the os of the
coronary sinus, the leftward extension (arrow) is seen in close
proximity to the central fibrous body. In follow-up sections, the
posterior extension gradually faded within the fibrous tissue. At the
site of the anticipated rightward extension, there is fatty tissue
only. TV indicates tricuspid valve. Hematoxylin-eosin stains.
Bar=1 mm.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Schematic representation of posterior
extensions of the compact AV node as encountered in this series of 21
randomly selected hearts. Note that none had a blunt-ending posterior
end of the compact node. One case showed a leftward extension only; 7
showed a rightward extension only; and 13 showed both rightward and
leftward extensions. The dotted lines indicate the site of transition
between compact node and His bundle.
). The latter, moreover, took a
course parallel to and closely related to the tricuspid annulus. Except
for the case with a leftward extension only, the rightward posterior
extension was by far the most prominent in each instance. In fact, in
16 hearts, this extension could be traced all the way underneath the
anterior margin of the CS ostium. The maximum length of the right
posterior extension was 9 mm, with a mean of 4.4±2.0 mm. In
contrast, the maximum length of the leftward extension was 4.0 mm,
with a mean of 1.8±0.9 mm. It appeared that the mean length of
the rightward posterior extension exceeded that of the length of the
compact AV node (4.4±2.0 versus 3.7±0.9 mm). Moreover, in 7 of
these 16 hearts, the posterior bundle extended even beyond the anterior
margin of the os of the CS and continued for some distance in the
subeustachian pouch, which represents the
posteroinferior right atrial free wall (Fig 7
). In these 21 hearts, the length of the
compact AV node varied between 2 and 5 mm, with a mean of
3.7±0.9 mm. In the same hearts, the length of Koch's triangle
varied between 15 and 32 mm, with a mean of 24.6±4.6 mm. The
length of the compact AV node and posterior extensions showed no
relation to the dimensions of Koch's triangle.

View larger version (182K):
[in a new window]
Figure 6. The compact part of the AV node, together with the
rightward and leftward posterior extensions, are superimposed on the
right-sided view of the AV septal junction of the same heart. The
rightward posterior extension runs in close proximity to the annular
attachment of the septal tricuspid valve leaflet and extends to the
level of the os of the coronary sinus.

View larger version (168K):
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Micrographs showing extension of the rightward
posterior extension beyond the os of the coronary sinus, into
the area of the subeustachian pouch. A, The posterior continuation of
the nodal bundle axis, at the base of the tricuspid valve (TV) leaflet
(arrow), shows a nodelike configuration, as described for Kent
nodes.19 It is obvious from this micrograph that the area
involved is no longer AV septal junctional but rather
posteroinferior free wall. B, The higher magnification of
this posterior extension shows the nodelike arrangement of the fibers
within this tract. Hematoxylin-eosin stains. Bar=1 mm.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The human AV node is not characterized by a blunt posterior end as
depicted in most electrophysiology texts. In fact, in this series of 21
randomly selected and basically normal hearts, not a single specimen
had such a blunt-ended AV node. On the contrary, 20 of the 21 AV nodes
had a rightward posterior extension from the compact part of the AV
node, 13 of which had an additional leftward extension. The remaining
heart showed an AV node with only a leftward posterior extension.
and 2D
) and, occasionally, a distinct nodelike cellular
arrangement (Fig 7
). The latter situation is very much reminiscent of
the nodelike structures described by Anderson et
al.11 Eventually, these extensions faded out; the
leftward extension eventually disappeared within the central fibrous
body at the site of the mitral valve annulus, whereas the rightward
extension gradually disappeared amid atrial myocardium.
The observation that posterior extensions of the compact part of
the AV node are a regular feature of AV nodal anatomy is also
of considerable interest once put into the perspective of AV nodal
development. It is presently acknowledged that the AV conduction
tissues develop from a "specialized" myocardial ring that, in the
early human embryo, encircles the interventricular
foramen.22 At this stage (5 weeks' development),
the AV canal is still positioned over the presumptive left ventricle.
At subsequent stages (6 to 7 weeks' development), the AV canal expands
toward the right, thus enabling the right atrium to directly contact
the developing right ventricle. During this process, the ring of
"specialized" myocardium moves with the rightward
expansion of the AV canal and, once fully developed, encircles the
right AV junction along the lower rim of the right atrium. The larger
part of this right AV ring is considered to disappear, with only the
compact part of the AV node and the AV (His) bundle remaining in the
normal heart. At the same time, the concept of a single
interventricular ring could explain why hearts with
abnormal septation or abnormal expansion of the right AV orifice, such
as hearts with a straddling tricuspid valve, contain an AV node and
bundle in an unusual position. Similarly, the "atriofascicular"
tracts that connect the right atrium to the right ventricle, exhibiting
Mahaim physiology, may well find their origin in so-called Kent nodes
that are considered to represent the remnants of the ring
tissue. Indeed, Kent nodes confined within the atrial tissues, which
have been shown to be a regular finding in normal
hearts,23 may fit the same concept. Along the
same lines of thought, one may anticipate that the posterior extensions
of the compact part of the AV node, as described in the present
study, reflect the remains of the ring tissue alluded to above. Indeed,
the nodelike structure found in one of our hearts (see Fig 7
) closely
resembles a Kent node, as previously discussed.11
An obvious limitation of the present study is that we have not
been able to study hearts with documented AV nodal reentrant
tachycardias. As far as we are aware, two case reports
exist24 25 that provide a
histological description of the site of slow pathway
ablation, each in a patient with clinically successful ablation. In
both instances, the site of ablation was readily identified and
localized posterior to the AV node. These observations have been
claimed to refute the concept that the AV nodal reentrant circuit is
entirely intranodal. This may well be correct, but because the
posterior extensions of the AV node are not mentioned, one should not
therefore deny the possibility that such extensions could have been
part of the slow pathway. Indeed, one may envision that part of the
reentrant circuit is formed by the posterior AV nodal approaches and
that the "burn" has destroyed the approach rather than the "slow
pathway" in the strict sense. In this context, it may be of interest
to refer to an electrophysiological study
performed in patients enrolled for cardiac
transplantation.26 None of the patients reported
in that study had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, but dual
AV nodal pathways could be documented in all patients before
transplantation. Histological evaluation of these
hearts did not reveal any departure from normal, although no further
specifications are provided with respect to the posterior extensions as
discussed in the present study.
![]()
Acknowledgments
During the course of this study, Dr Inoue was a research fellow
from the Showa University Hospital, Showa University School of
Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Becker AE. Atrioventricular nodal
anatomy revisited. Learning Center Highlights. 1994;9:1722.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.#x.;n. Farré, H. J.J. Wellens, J.#x. M. Rubio, and J. Benezet CHAPTER 28 Supraventricular Tachycardias ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakagawa and W. M. Jackman Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Circulation, November 20, 2007; 116(21): 2465 - 2478. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Hucker, V. Sharma, V. P. Nikolski, and I. R. Efimov Atrioventricular conduction with and without AV nodal delay: two pathways to the bundle of His in the rabbit heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1122 - H1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Katritsis, K. A. Ellenbogen, A. E. Becker, and A. J. Camm Retrograde slow pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 458 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G Katritsis and A. J. Camm Classification and differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Europace, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F G Cosio Should ablation be the first line treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias? Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 5 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Racker The AV junction region of the heart: a comprehensive study correlating gross anatomy and direct three-dimensional analysis. Part II. Morphology and cytoarchitecture Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1853 - H1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B Hoover, C. E Ganote, S. M Ferguson, R. D Blakely, and R. L Parsons Localization of cholinergic innervation in guinea pig heart by immunohistochemistry for high-affinity choline transporters Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2004; 62(1): 112 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Ko, H.-I Yeh, Y.-L. Ko, Y.-C. Hsu, C.-F. Chen, S. Wu, Y.-S. Lee, and N. J. Severs Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Rabbit Atrioventricular Conduction Axis by Combining Histological, Desmin, and Connexin Mapping Data Circulation, March 9, 2004; 109(9): 1172 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-a. Matsuyama, S. Inoue, Y. Kobayashi, T. Sakai, T. Saito, T. Katagiri, and H. Ota Anatomical diversity and age-related histological changes in the human right atrial posterolateral wall Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 307 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Heidbüchel and W. M. Jackman Characterization of subforms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 316 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Wit Atrioventricular Nodal Electrophysiology: Still Exciting After All These Years Circ. Res., November 28, 2003; 93(11): 1018 - 1019. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dobrzynski, V. P. Nikolski, A. T. Sambelashvili, I. D. Greener, M. Yamamoto, M. R. Boyett, and I. R. Efimov Site of Origin and Molecular Substrate of Atrioventricular Junctional Rhythm in the Rabbit Heart Circ. Res., November 28, 2003; 93(11): 1102 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Loh, S. Y. Ho, T. Kawara, R. N.W. Hauer, M. J. Janse, G. Breithardt, and J. M.T. de Bakker Reentrant Circuits in the Canine Atrioventricular Node During Atrial and Ventricular Echoes: Electrophysiological and Histological Correlation Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 231 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. P. Nikolski, S. A. Jones, M. K. Lancaster, M. R. Boyett, and I. R. Efimov Cx43 and Dual-Pathway Electrophysiology of the Atrioventricular Node and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Circ. Res., March 7, 2003; 92(4): 469 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, and T. N. Mazgalev His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Slow-Pathway Modification Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Gonzalez, L. J. Contreras, F. Cardona, C. J. Klugewicz, J. B. Conti, A. B. Curtis, T. E. Morey, and D. M. Dennis Demonstration of a Left Atrial Input to the Atrioventricular Node in Humans Circulation, December 3, 2002; 106(23): 2930 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamabe, Y. Shimasaki, O. Honda, Y. Kimura, and Y. Hokamura Demonstration of the Exact Anatomic Tachycardia Circuit in the Fast-Slow Form of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, September 11, 2001; 104(11): 1268 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schwartzman, E. N. Warman, W. A. Devine, and R. Mehra Attenuation of interatrial conduction using right atrial septal catheter ablation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 892 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rokas, S. Gaitanidou, S. Chatzidou, C. Pamboucas, D. Achtipis, and S. Stamatelopoulos Atrioventricular Node Modification in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Morphology of RR Interval Variation Circulation, June 19, 2001; 103(24): 2942 - 2948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-S. Kim, S. Viragh, A. F. M. Moorman, R. H. Anderson, and W. H. Lamers Development of the Myocardium of the Atrioventricular Canal and the Vestibular Spine in the Human Heart Circ. Res., March 2, 2001; 88(4): 395 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nikolski and I. R. Efimov Fluorescent Imaging of a Dual-Pathway Atrioventricular-Nodal Conduction System Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88 (3): e23 - e30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. Mazgalev and P. J. Tchou Surface Potentials From the Region of the Atrioventricular Node and Their Relation to Dual Pathway Electrophysiology Circulation, May 2, 2000; 101(17): 2110 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Racker and A. H. Kadish Proximal Atrioventricular Bundle, Atrioventricular Node, and Distal Atrioventricular Bundle Are Distinct Anatomic Structures With Unique Histological Characteristics and Innervation Circulation, March 7, 2000; 101(9): 1049 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chauvin, D. C. Shah, M. Haissaguerre, L. Marcellin, and C. Brechenmacher The Anatomic Basis of Connections Between the Coronary Sinus Musculature and the Left Atrium in Humans Circulation, February 15, 2000; 101(6): 647 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C Rankin and A. J Workman Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamabe, I. Misumi, H. Fukushima, K. Ueno, Y. Kimura, and Y. Hokamura Electrophysiological Delineation of the Tachycardia Circuit in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sun, E. O. Velipasaoglu, D. E. Wu, H. A. Kopelen, W. A. Zoghbi, W. H. Spencer III, and D. S. Khoury Simultaneous Multisite Mapping of the Right and the Left Atrial Septum in the Canine Intact Beating Heart Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 312 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, G. Fahy, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Atrial Input Modification Circulation, May 4, 1999; 99(17): 2323 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Kucera, A. G. Kleber, and S. Rohr Slow Conduction in Cardiac Tissue, II : Effects of Branching Tissue Geometry Circ. Res., October 19, 1998; 83(8): 795 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Medkour, A. E. Becker, K. Khalife, and J. Billette Anatomic and Functional Characteristics of a Slow Posterior AV Nodal Pathway : Role in Dual-Pathway Physiology and Reentry Circulation, July 14, 1998; 98(2): 164 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wu, J. Wu, J. Olgin, J. M. Miller, and D. P. Zipes Mechanisms Underlying the Reentrant Circuit of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Isolated Canine Atrioventricular Nodal Preparation Using Optical Mapping Circ. Res., June 8, 2001; 88(11): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |