Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;97:729-735

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittekoek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelein, J. J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittekoek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelein, J. J. P.

(Circulation. 1998;97:729-735.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

A Common Mutation in the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene (N291S) Alters the Lipoprotein Phenotype and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Marianne E. Wittekoek, MSc; Simon N. Pimstone, MD; Paul W. A. Reymer, BSc; Lisette Feuth, MSc; Gert-Jan Botma, MSc; Joep C. Defesche, PhD; M. Prins; Michael R. Hayden, MD, PhD; ; John J. P. Kastelein, MD, PhD

From the Lipid Research Group, Department of Vascular Medicine (M.E.W., P.W.A.R., L.F., J.C.D., M.P., J.J.P.K.), and the Department of Medical Statistics (G.-J.T.), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and the Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (S.N.P., M.R.H.).

Correspondence to Michael R. Hayden, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 416-2125 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail mrh{at}ulam.generes.ca


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Recently, a mutation in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene (N291S) has been reported in 2% to 5% of individuals in western populations and is associated with increased triglyceride (TG) and reduced HDL cholesterol (HDLC) concentrations.

Methods and Results—Here we report a significant alteration in biochemical and clinical phenotype in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) who are heterozygous for this N291S LPL mutation. Sixty-four FH heterozygotes carrying the N291S mutation had significantly a higher TG level (P=.004), a higher ratio of total cholesterol to HDLC (P<.001), and lower HDLC concentrations (P=.002) compared with 175 FH heterozygotes without this LPL mutation. Moreover, the N291S mutation conferred a significantly greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease in FH heterozygotes compared with FH heterozygotes without this LPL mutation (odds ratio, 3.875; P=.006).

Conclusions—These data provide evidence that a common LPL variant (N291S) significantly influences the biochemical phenotype and risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with FH.


Key Words: genetics • lipoproteins • atherosclerosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lipoprotein lipase is a multifunctional protein, playing a major role in the hydrolysis of TG-rich lipoproteins.1 Over 60 mutations in the LPL gene have been described that result in a functionally defective catalytic protein and that occur with a frequency of {approx}1 in 500 persons.2 Recently, a more common serine for asparagine substitution at residue 291 (N291S) in exon 6 of the LPL gene has been described3 that is observed with high frequency, ranging from 2% to 5% in different populations.4 5 This N291S mutation is associated with partial reduction in LPL activity, both in vivo and in vitro,5 and has been associated with reduced levels of HDLC and elevated TGs in some populations.4 5 6 7 8

Despite its association with dyslipoproteinemia, the association between this common LPL mutation and premature CVD is still controversial. We hypothesized that such an association might become particularly apparent if this N291S mutation were studied in a population at increased risk for premature atherosclerosis. Animal models particularly susceptible to atherosclerosis, such as mice with targeted disruption of the apolipoprotein E gene or the gene for the LDL receptor, have been effectively used to monitor the effects of changes in other genes. For example, mice lacking functional LDL receptors (LDLR -/-) have a predisposition to significant hypercholesterolemia and premature atherogenesis. When LDLR -/- mice are crossed with mice overexpressing LPL, a significant attenuation of the biochemical and clinical phenotype is observed.9

FH is a common autosomal dominant disorder of lipoprotein metabolism, affecting {approx}1 in 500 people in the western world.10 Defects in the gene coding for the LDL receptor result in disturbed clearance of LDL cholesterol because of impaired hepatic LDL receptor function. In subjects with heterozygous FH, concentrations of plasma cholesterol are generally increased two to three times, and cholesterol accumulates in extrahepatic sites, resulting in the typical characteristics of FH, including tendon xanthomata and premature CVD.10 Untreated, {approx}75% of men and 40% of women with heterozygous FH will undergo a coronary event before 60 years of age.11

Recently, we reported that the N291S mutation in the LPL gene was associated with reduced HDLC concentrations in FH families,12 and it was suggested that LPL mutations may underlie some cases of low HDL concentrations observed in patients with FH.13 14 15 What remains unanswered, however, is whether this common N291S LPL mutation influences lipoprotein phenotype and risk for CVD in a large cohort of FH patients. This study was therefore undertaken to assess whether this common LPL mutation might be associated with a change in the risk for CVD in patients with heterozygous FH.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
A total of 1045 patients with FH, all residing in the Netherlands, were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis of heterozygous FH was based on either the presence of a documented LDL receptor mutation and/or the following criteria: LDL cholesterol levels above the 95th percentile for sex and age, the presence of typical tendon xanthomas in the patient or in a first-degree relative, or a pediatric relative with an LDL cholesterol level above the 95th percentile for sex and age. Secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia, including renal and hepatic disease, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism, were excluded in all subjects. In addition, all biochemical and clinical parameters were assessed at presenting lipid clinic visits with subjects off lipid-lowering medication for at least 3 months. No subjects were first-degree relatives.

Cases were defined as all FH heterozygotes who were positive for the N291S mutation and who did not carry the common D9N mutation in the LPL gene. From the remaining FH cohort who did not carry the N291S or the D9N mutations in the LPL gene, a control group of 175 FH patients was selected for comparison. These individuals were selected in a case-control manner by selecting, from the cohort of 1045 available FH heterozygotes, control subjects for each FH case matched for age, sex, and body mass but blinded for all other parameters, including lipid levels, blood pressure, smoking, alcohol intake, and presence of CVD. Medical history, physical examination, lifestyle habits, dietary assessments, and additional risk factors for CVD, as well as laboratory analysis of lipid and lipoprotein levels and routine biochemistry, were obtained in all cases and control subjects.

DNA Analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes as previously described.16 The LPL N291S mutation was assessed in 1045 FH heterozygotes by polymerase chain reaction amplification by use of a mismatch primer and followed by digestion with RSA I as described previously.17 All cases and control subjects were also analyzed for the D9N mutation in the LPL gene by methods described previously.18 Subjects were excluded from the study if they carried the D9N LPL mutation.

Biochemical Analysis
Total plasma cholesterol was determined by an enzymatic colorimetric procedure by use of cholesterolesterase.19 HDLC was determined after precipitation of apo-B–containing lipoproteins.20 TGs were quantified by an enzymatic colorimetric procedure by use of lipase, glycerokinase, and glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase.21 LDL cholesterol was calculated by use of the Friedewald formula, which is valid up to a TG level of 8 mmol/L.22 23

Cardiovascular Disease
CVD was considered to be present if subjects met one of the following criteria: (1) if subjects had undergone a myocardial infarction, proven by ECG abnormalities and enzyme changes; (2) if the patient had suffered an ischemic stroke; (3) if a diagnosis of clinically documented angina pectoris had been made; (4) if a history of intermittent claudication was present; or (5) if an intervention by either coronary bypass surgery or balloon angioplasty had been performed.

Statistical Analysis
FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation were compared. Results are reported by use of untransformed and unadjusted variables. Because both groups were matched for age, sex, andBMI, standard t tests were used to compare means of the variables studied. TGs were log transformed before analysis, but untransformed levels are reported.

{chi}2 analysis was used to compare the frequency of cases and control subjects in TG, HDL, and BMI tertiles. For comparison of the prevalence of CVD in both groups, the Fisher's exact test was used. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of the N291S mutation on lipid abnormalities and cardiovascular risk.

All statistical analyses were performed by use of the Systat statistical package (UBC) except the logistic regression models, which were determined by use of the SPSS package (UBC). A value of P<.05 was used to declare statistical significance.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Frequency of the N291S Mutation
Of the 1045 FH heterozygotes screened, 68 subjects (32 men and 36 women; 6.5%) were carriers of the N291S LPL mutation. This frequency is not significantly different from previous estimates for the frequency of this mutation in the Dutch general population.5 Four of these subjects who also carried the common D9N LPL mutation were excluded from the case cohort for lipid, lipoprotein, and cardiovascular assessment.

Baseline Demographics, Anthropometry, and Risk Factor Assessment
Baseline characteristics of FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation are shown in Table 1Down. These groups were matched for age, BMI, and sex ratio. There also were no significant differences in blood pressure, smoking, alcohol intake, and plasma glucose levels. Of the 64 FH heterozygotes with the N291S mutation, 22 (34.4%) had a defined LDL receptor mutation. Of 175 FH heterozygote control subjects without the N291S mutation, 46 (26.3%) had a defined LDL receptor mutation (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of FH Patients With and Without the LPL N291S Mutation

Lipoprotein Assessment
Both groups of patients were similarly characterized by elevated total and LDL cholesterol concentrations as expected for patients with FH (Table 2Down). FH heterozygotes with the LPL N291S mutation had more marked dyslipoproteinemia, characterized by higher TG levels (P=.004) and lower HDLC levels (P=.002) compared with FH heterozygotes without the N291S mutation. In addition, significantly higher TC concentrations (P=.02) and ratios of TC to HDLC (P<.001) were observed in FH heterozygotes with the N291S mutation compared with FH heterozygotes without this mutation (Table 2Down). No significant differences between the groups were observed with respect to LDL cholesterol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Lipid Levels in FH Patients With and Without the LPL N291S Mutation

The total cohort of FH cases and control subjects was further analyzed by sex. In women, a significantly lower HDLC concentration (1.23±0.34 versus 1.44±0.35 mmol/L; P=.003), higher TG concentration (1.67±1.04 versus 1.27±0.54 mmol/L; P=.007), and higher TC/HDL ratio (8.00±2.98 versus 6.38±2.26, P=.001) was observed in FH heterozygotes carrying the N291S mutation (n=34) compared with female FH heterozygotes without this mutation (n=91).

A similar trend was observed in men, in whom lower HDLC (1.07±0.38 versus 1.19±0.36 mmol/L; P=.1), higher TG concentrations (2.01±1.10 versus 1.55±0.71 mmol/L, P=.01), and higher TC/HDL ratios (9.34±4.57 versus 7.50±2.57, P=.008) were observed in male FH heterozygotes who carried the N291S mutation (n=30) compared with male FH heterozygotes without this LPL mutation (n=84).

Logistic regression models incorporating the covariates of smoking, sex, age, alcohol, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were used to test for associations between the N291S LPL mutation and the low HDL/high TG phenotype. As illustrated in Table 3Down, the N291S mutation was associated with an increased likelihood for low HDLC (<0.91 mmol/L; P=.02) and elevated TG (>2.82 mmol/L; P=.02). In addition, the N291S mutation was associated with an increased odds for having combined dyslipidemia (HDL<0.91 and TG >2.82 mmol/L), but this did not reach statistical significance, probably because of the small sample size (n=6) with this phenotype (P=.09).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. OR for Association Between the N291S Mutation and the Low HDL/High TG Phenotype

Frequency of the N291S Mutation by TG and HDL Tertiles
The FH cohort (cases and control subjects) was divided into tertiles for both HDL and TG levels. FH heterozygotes carrying the N291S mutation were significantly enriched in the lowest HDL tertile compared with the number of FH heterozygotes in the middle and upper HDL tertiles. Of the 80 FH heterozygotes in the lowest HDL tertile, 33 (41.25%) were carriers of the N291S mutation compared with 18 of 81 (22.22%) in the middle HDL tertile (P=.015) and 13 of 78 (16.67%) in the upper tertile (P=.001; Fig 1ADown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Frequency of FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation by HDL tertiles. A significant enrichment of N291S carriers is evident in the lowest HDL tertile. B, Frequency of FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation by TG tertiles. A significant enrichment of N291S carriers is evident in the highest TG tertile.

In addition, within the lowest HDL tertile, FH heterozygotes with the N291S mutation were significantly enriched compared with FH heterozygotes without this mutation. Of the 64 heterozygotes with the N291S mutation, 33 (51.56%) were found in this tertile compared with 47 of the 175 FH heterozygotes without this mutation (26.86%) (P=.005; Fig 1AUp). Furthermore, in the highest HDL tertile, FH patients with the N291S mutation were underrepresented. Only 13 of 64 FH cases (16.76%) clustered in this tertile compared with 65 of 175 FH control subjects (37.14%; P=.02; Fig 1AUp).

Dividing the groups by TG tertiles revealed an overrepresentation of FH heterozygotes with the N291S mutation in the upper tertile. Of 81 subjects in this tertile, 29 (35.8%) were N291S carriers compared to the middle (where 20 of 79 subjects [25.3%] were N291S carriers) and lower TG tertiles (where15 out of 79 subjects [19.0%] were N291S carriers; P=.03; Fig 1BUp).

In addition, FH patients with the N291S mutation were overrepresented in the highest TG tertile (29 out of 64 FH cases, 45.31%) compared with FH control subjects without the N291S mutation (51 of 175 FH controls, 29.71%; P=.04). A lower frequency of FH patients with this LPL mutation (15 out of 64 FH cases, 18.99%) compared with FH control subjects (64 of 175 FH control subjects, 36.57%) was observed in the lowest TG tertile (P=.08; Fig 1BUp).

Influence of BMI
The FH cohort was divided into tertiles of BMI as follows: (1) BMI <22.31 kg/m2 (n=79), (2) BMI between 22.31 and 24.61 kg/m2 (n=80), and (3) BMI >24.61 kg/m2 (n=80). Within each BMI tertile, mean TG and HDLC were compared for both FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation (Fig 2ADown and 2BDown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Mean plasma TG concentrations in FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation by BMI tertiles. Higher TG concentrations were evident in N291S carriers at higher BMI tertiles but were not evident at the lowest BMI tertile, suggesting a significant interaction between this common LPL mutation and body mass. B, Mean plasma HDL of FH heterozygotes with and without the N291S mutation by BMI tertiles. Lower HDLC was evident in N291S carriers at higher BMI tertiles but was not evident at the lowest BMI tertile, suggesting a significant interaction between this common LPL mutation and body mass.

In the upper BMI tertile, significantly higher TG levels were observed in FH patients with the N291S mutation (2.14±1.33 mmol/L) compared with FH control subjects without this LPL mutation (1.61±0.70 mmol/L; P=.01; Fig 2AUp). In addition, in this BMI tertile, significantly lower HDLC levels were observed in FH patients with the LPL mutation (1.08±0.32 mmol/L) compared with FH control subjects (1.29±0.38 mmol/L; P=.02; Fig 2BUp). In the middle BMI tertile, subjects with FH and the N291S mutation also had lower HDLC (1.12±0.29 mmol/L versus 1.37±0.41 mmol/L; P=.02) and higher TG levels (2.02±0.91 versus 1.42±0.55 mmol/L; P=.009) compared with FH control subjects. No significant difference between FH cases and control subjects was observed in the lowest BMI tertile with respect to either TG or HDLC concentration. These results suggest a significant interaction between BMI and this LPL mutation, with the phenotypic effects of this mutation clearly unmasked in patients with high BMIs.

Prevalence of CVD
The prevalence of CVD was almost two times greater in FH heterozygotes with the N291S mutation compared with FH heterozygotes without this mutation. Of the 64 FH cases, 19 had a history of CVD compared with 21 of 175 FH control subjects (P=.002; Table 4Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Prevalence of and OR for CVD in FH Patients With and Without the N291S Mutation

Although the prevalence of CVD was significantly higher in FH cases with the N291S mutation, no significant difference in age of onset of CVD between FH cases and FH control subjects was observed. FH patients with the N291S mutation had a mean age of onset of CVD of 49.0±12.8 years compared with 44.9±8.8 years in FH control subjects (P=.3; data not shown).

Furthermore, no difference in the type of CVD was observed between FH subjects with and without the N291S mutation. Of the 19 FH heterozygotes with the LPL mutation, 15 had coronary artery disease, 2 had cerebrovascular disease, and 2 had peripheral vascular disease. Of the 21 FH control subjects (without the N291S mutation) with CVD, 15 had coronary artery disease, 4 had cerebrovascular disease, and 2 had peripheral vascular disease. In addition, no difference in the number of coronary events was observed between FH subjects with and without the N291S mutation (data not shown).

Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant influence of the N291S mutation on the likelihood of developing CVD in the FH cohort. After adjustment for known risk factors, including smoking, sex, age, alcohol intake, BMI, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures, this LPL mutation conferred a significantly increased risk of developing CVD in patients with FH (OR, 3.89; P=.003; 95% CI, 1.59 to 9.51). The addition of HDLC, TG, and LDLC to the model had very little effect on these results (OR, 3.88; P=.006; 95% CI, 1.47 to 10.22; Table 4Up). In this model, the N291S LPL mutation was the most significant predictor of CVD status, followed by age (OR, 1.11; P<.001; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.17), sex (OR, 0.23; P=.009; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.69), and BMI (OR, 1.29; P=.02; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.59; data not shown).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We have studied a cohort of FH heterozygotes to assess the effect of a common LPL mutation (N291S) on both lipoprotein phenotype and risk for atherosclerosis. Despite its previously reported association with dyslipoproteinemia, the association between this mutation and an increased incidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease remains controversial. To assess this possible association, we have studied a group of individuals already at high risk for CVD to determine whether this mutation altered the risk for developing atherosclerosis in this cohort.

Here, we demonstrate that the N291S LPL mutation, detected in 6.5% of 1045 FH heterozygotes studied, not only had a significant deleterious effect on lipoprotein phenotype but also significantly increased cardiovascular risk in subjects with this LPL mutation.

Individuals with heterozygous FH manifest with elevated TC and LDL cholesterol concentrations and have a significantly increased predisposition to premature CVD.10 It has been reported, however, that significant variability does exist with respect to the biochemical and clinical phenotype in FH.24 25 Apart from the elevated LDL cholesterol concentrations observed in FH, numerous studies of FH heterozygotes have observed a trend toward low HDLC concentrations.13 14 15 26 Low HDLC and high TG concentrations also have been shown to correlate positively with increased frequency of myocardial infarction in men with FH.27 Recently, we reported in FH families that mutations in the LPL gene can result in reduced HDLC concentrations in individuals carrying mutations in both the LDL receptor and LPL genes.12 Here, we confirm and extend these findings by illustrating the effect of the common N291S mutation in a large cohort of FH heterozygotes.

Double FH/LPL heterozygotes presented with significantly lower HDLC, higher TG, and higher TC concentrations and higher TC/HDL ratios compared with FH heterozygotes without the N291S LPL mutation. This mutation predisposed to the combined low HDLC/high TG phenotype as illustrated by logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, FH heterozygotes with this LPL mutation were enriched in the lowest HDL and highest TG tertiles in this FH cohort.

The influence of the N291S mutation on lipid levels was most apparent when acting in concert with increased BMI. Significant differences in TG and HDLC were apparent only between FH N291S carriers and FH control subjects in the middle and upper tertiles of body mass. These data support prior observations of a significant interaction between this mutation and increased body mass.6 8 This finding may have clinical and therapeutic implications and could provide support specifically for encouraging weight loss, particularly in FH heterozygotes who carry this LPL mutation.

The overall incidence of CVD in this study population was in keeping with the reported expected incidence for FH heterozygotes of this age.10 Of 239 FH heterozygotes, 40 (16.74%) with a mean age of 38.7±15.8 years had evidence of CVD.

In addition to the effect of this mutation on lipoprotein phenotype, we were able to demonstrate a significant positive association between this N291S mutation on cardiovascular risk in FH heterozygotes. Logistic regression analysis determined that in this cohort, the effect of the N291S mutation in increasing the risk for developing CVD was greater than any other risk factors added to the model (including smoking, age, sex, alcohol intake, BMI, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures). The effect of the N291S mutation on CVD risk also was in part independent of its effect on lipid levels, as illustrated in Table 4Up. This finding may be related in part to the roles of LPL outside its lipolytic function. Altered proteoglycan binding or lipid particle uptake at the level of the vessel wall might account for this finding. We must also point out that only a single fasting lipid determination, as was undertaken in this study, may underestimate the long-term effect of this LPL mutation on lipoprotein metabolism. Serial lipid measurements in N291S carriers before they go on a lipid-lowering diet with subsequent weight loss may reveal a stronger association between this mutation, lipid levels, and CVD risk.

Clearly, other factors may also influence the lipoprotein phenotype and risk for atherosclerosis in patients with FH. Dietary differences may account for an altered phenotype in FH, as we have recently illustrated by comparing the phenotypes of Chinese FH heterozygotes with the same LDL receptor mutations residing in either China or Canada (S.N. Pimstone, X-M Sun, C. du Souich, J.J. Frohlich, M.R. Hayden, A.K. Soutar, unpublished data, 1997). Furthermore, additional genetic factors, Lp(a) concentrations, and the underlying LDL receptor mutation might also influence the FH phenotype. Although we were not able to directly assess all of these in this study, these factors are unlikely to account for these results. Patients with many different functional LDL receptor mutations were included in the FH cohorts with and without the N291S mutations. Furthermore, there were no differences in apo E genotype frequencies between the groups (data not shown). Within the cohort of 19 N291S subjects with CVD, all apo E genotypes apart from apo E2/E2 were represented. Lp(a) concentrations were not available from this cohort, but data with respect to both apo E genotype and Lp(a) concentrations factors predictably altering coronary risk in FH have been contradictory.26 28 29 30 31 Furthermore, dietary differences are unlikely to have had a significant influence on coronary risk in this population. All of these subjects were reported to be following a low fat/low cholesterol diet monitored by the lipid clinics at which they were being followed.

The influence of this common LPL mutation on CVD risk must, at least in part, be explained by the effect of the N291S mutation on LPL function. This mutation decreases LPL catalytic activity both in vivo and in vitro,5 32 resulting in impaired catabolism of chylomicrons and VLDL particles and in hypertriglyceridemia.1 Resulting TG elevations in carriers of the N291S mutation contribute to a reduction in LDL particle size.33 Small, dense LDL in association with impaired postprandial TG clearance observed in carriers of the N291S mutation34 may in part be responsible for increasing atherogenic risk in FH heterozygotes who carry this LPL defect.

Here, we report for the first time that a large cohort of FH heterozygous subjects also carrying the N291S LPL mutation have significantly lower HDL levels, higher TG levels, and higher ratios of TC to HDL and are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease compared with FH heterozygotes without this mutation. Because the LPL mutation segregates independently of the mutation in the LDL receptor gene, LPL mutations may account in part for the variability of TG and HDL levels observed in FH patients and FH families and furthermore may contribute to the variability in the clinical course observed in heterozygous FH. These data illustrate that this common LPL variant is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic disease in patients heterozygous for FH and suggest that this common LPL mutation may influence risk for CVD in the general population.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
apo = apolipoprotein
BMI = body mass index
CI = confidence interval
CVD = cardiovascular disease
FH = familial hypercholesterolemia
HDLC = HDL cholesterol
Lp = lipoprotein
LPL = lipoprotein lipase
OR = odds ratio
TC = total cholesterol
TG = triglyceride


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by the MRC Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and the Yukon. Dr Hayden is an established investigator at the BC Children's Hospital.

Received May 30, 1997; revision received October 13, 1997; accepted October 29, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Brunzell JD. Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency and other causes of chylomicronemia syndrome. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AC, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book Co; 1995:1913–1932.

2. Julien P. High frequency of lipoprotein lipase deficiency in the Quebec population. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:675–676.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Ma Y, Ooi TC, Liu M-SL, Zhang H, McPherson R, Edwards AL, Forsythe IJ, Frohlich J, Brunzell JD, Hayden MR. High frequency of mutations in the human lipoprotein lipase gene in pregnancy-induced chylomicronemia: possible association with apolipoprotein E2 isoform. J Lipid Res. 1994;35:1066–1075.[Abstract]

4. Gagné SE, Pimstone SN, Larson MG, Schaefer EJ, Kastelein JJP, Wilson PWF, Ordovas JM, Hayden MR. Effects of lipoprotein lipase gene mutations on plasma lipids: the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-273. Abstract.

5. Reymer PWA, Gagné SE, Groenemeyer BE, Zhang H, Forsyth IJ, Jansen H, Seidell JC, Kromhout D, Lie KE, Kastelein JJP, Hayden MR. A lipoprotein lipase mutation (Asn291Ser) is associated with reduced HDL levels in premature atherosclerosis. Nat Genet. 1995;10:28–33.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Reymer PWA, Groenemeyer BE, Gagné SE, Miao L, Appelman EEG, Seidel JC, Kromhout D, Bijvoet SM, van de Oever K, Bruin T, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJP. A frequently occurring mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene (Asn291Ser) contributes to the expression of familial combined hyperlipidemia. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1543–1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Reymer PWA, Groenemeyer BE, Ma Y, Appelman EEG, van De Oever K, Bruin T, Seidel JC, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJP. A frequently occurring mutation in the LPL gene contributes to the expression of FCH and FDL and aggravates dyslipidemia in these patients. Atherosclerosis. 1994;109:64. Abstract.

8. Fisher RM, Mailly F, Peacock RE, Hamsten A, Seed M, Yudkin JS, Beisiegel U, Feussner G, Miller G, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ. Interaction of the lipoprotein lipase asparagine 291->serine mutation with body mass index determines elevated plasma triacylglycerol concentrations: a study in hyperlipidemic subjects, myocardial infarction survivors, and healthy adults. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:2104–2112.[Abstract]

9. Shimada M, Ishibashi S, Inaba T, Yagyu H, Harada K, Osuga J-I, Ohashi K, Yazaki Y, Yamada N. Suppression of diet-induced atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice overexpressing lipoprotein lipase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:7242–7246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Goldstein J, Hobbs HH, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AC, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book Co; 1995:1981–2030.

11. Slack J. Risk of ischemic heart disease in familial lipoproteinemic states. Lancet. 1969;2:1380–1382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Pimstone SN, Gagné SE, Gagné C, Lupien PJ, Gaudet D, Williams RR, Kotze M, Reymer PWA, Defesche JC, Kastelein JJP, Moorjani S, Hayden MR. Mutations in the gene for lipoprotein lipase: a cause for low HDL cholesterol levels in individuals heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1704–1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Inazu A, Koizumi H, Kajinami K, Takeda R. Enhanced cholesteryl ester transfer protein activities and abnormalities of high density lipoproteins in familial hypercholesterolemia. Horm Metab Res. 1992;24:284–288.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Seftel HC, Baker SG, Sandler MP, Forman MB, Joffe HI, Mendelsohn D, Jenkins T, Mieny CJ. A host of hypercholesterolemic homozygotes in South Africa. BMJ. 1980;281:633–636.

15. Kwiterowich PO. Familial hypercholesterolemia (one form of familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia): a study of its biochemical, genetic and clinical presentation in childhood. J Clin Invest. 1973;53:1237–1249.

16. Technical tips: an efficient salt-chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trends Genet. 1989;5:391.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Zhang H, Reymer PWA, Liu M-S, Forsythe IJ, Groenemeyer BE, Frohlich J, Brunzell JD, Kastelein JJP, Hayden MR, Ma Y. Patients with apoE3 deficiency (E2/E2, E3/E2 and E4/E2) who manifest with hyperlipidemia have increased frequency of an Asn291Ser mutation in the human LPL gene. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1695–1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Mailly F, Tugrul Y, Reymer PWA, Bruin T, Seed M, Groenemeyer BE, Asplund-Carlson A, Vallance D, Winder AF, Miller GJ, Kastelein JJP, Hamsten A, Olivecrona G, Humphries SE, Talmud P. A common variant in the gene for lipoprotein lipase (Asp9->Asn): functional implications and prevalence in normal and hyperlipidemic subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:468–478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CSG, Richmond W, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974;20:470–475.[Abstract]

20. Warnick GR, Albers JJ. Heparin-Mn2+ quantification of high density lipoprotein cholesterol: an ultracentrifugation procedure for lipidemic samples. Clin Chem. 1978;24:900–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Buccolo G, David H. Quantative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem. 1973;19:476–482.[Abstract]

22. Friedewald WT, Levy RJ, Frederickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of preparative ultra-centrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.[Abstract]

23. Demacker PN, Toenhake-Dijkstra H, de Rijke YB, Stalenhoef AF, Stuyt PM, Willems HL. On the presumed inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula in hypertriglyceridemic plasma: a role for imprecise analysis? Clin Chem. 1996;42:1491–1494.[Free Full Text]

24. Thompson GR, Seed M, Niththyananthan S, McCarthy S, Thorogood M. Genotypic and phenotypic variation in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9(suppl I):I-75-I-80.

25. Schrott HG, Goldstein JL, Hazzard WR, McGoodwin MM, Motulsky AG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in a large kindred. Ann Intern Med. 1972;76:711–720.

26. Hill JS, Hayden MR, Frohlich J, Pritchard PH. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the incidence of coronary artery disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:290–297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Moorjani S, Gagné C, Lupien P-J, Brun D. Plasma triglyceride related decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and its association with myocardial infarction in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 1986;35:311–316.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Seed M, Hoppichler F, Reavely D, McCarthy S, Thopson GR, Boerwinkle E, Utermann G. Relation of serum lipoprotein (a) concentration and apolipoprotein (a) phenotype to coronary heart disease in patients with familial hypcholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1494–1499.[Abstract]

29. Carmena R, Lussier-Cacan S, Roy M, Minnich A, Lingenhal A, Davignon J. Lp(A) levels and atherosclerotic vascular disease in a sample of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia sharing the same gene defect. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:129–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Ferrières J, Sing CF, Madeleine R, Davignon J, Lussier-Cacan S. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: sex-specific effects. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1553–1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Berglund L, Wiklund O, Egertson G, Olofsson S-O, Eriksson M, Linden T, Bondjers G, Angelin B. Apolipoprotein E phenotypes in familial hypercholesterolemia: importance for expression of disease and response to therapy. J Intern Med. 1993;233:173–178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Zhang H, Henderson H, Gagné SE, Clee SM, Miao L, Liu G, Hayden MR. Common sequence variants of lipoprotein lipase: standardized studies of in vitro expression and catalytic function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1302:159–166.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Syvänne M, Antikainen M, Ehnholm S, Tenkanen H, Lahdenparä S, Ehnholm C, Taskinen M-R. Heterozygosity for Asn291->Ser mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene in two Finnish pedigrees: effect of hyperinsulinemia on the expression of hypertriglyceridemia. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:727–738.[Abstract]

34. Pimstone SN, Clee S, Gagné SE, Miao L, Zhang H, Stein EA, Hayden MR. A frequently occurring mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene (Asn291Ser) results in altered postprandial chylomicron triglyceride and retinyl palmitate response in normolipidemic carriers. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:1675–1684.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. C. M. C. Koeijvoets, E. F. C. van Rossum, G. M. Dallinga-Thie, E. W. Steyerberg, J. C. Defesche, J. J. P. Kastelein, S. W. J. Lamberts, and E. J. G. Sijbrands
A Functional Polymorphism in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene and Its Relation to Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4131 - 4136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Hu, W. Liu, R. Huang, and X. Zhang
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between lipoprotein lipase Asn291Ser variant and diseases
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1908 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Koike, J. Liang, X. Wang, T. Ichikawa, M. Shiomi, G. Liu, H. Sun, S. Kitajima, M. Morimoto, T. Watanabe, et al.
Overexpression of Lipoprotein Lipase in Transgenic Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic Rabbits Improves Hyperlipidemia and Obesity
J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 7521 - 7529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. Merkel, R. H. Eckel, and I. J. Goldberg
Lipoprotein lipase: genetics, lipid uptake, and regulation
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1997 - 2006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. O. Akosah, R. M. Cerniglia, P. Havlik, and A. Schaper
Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels <= 100 mg/dL : Clinical Profile and 1-Year Outcomes
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6): 1953 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. H. McGladdery and J. J. Frohlich
Lipoprotein lipase and apoE polymorphisms: relationship to hypertriglyceridemia during pregnancy
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2001; 42(11): 1905 - 1912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. J. Kim, R. A. Williamson, K. Chen, J. L. Smith, J. C. Murray, and D. C. Merrill
Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Mutations and the Genetic Susceptibility of Preeclampsia
Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 992 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Levy, D. Menard, E. Delvin, S. Stan, G. Mitchell, M. Lambert, E. Ziv, J. C. Feoli-Fonseca, and E. Seidman
The Polymorphism at Codon 54 of the FABP2 Gene Increases Fat Absorption in Human Intestinal Explants
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39679 - 39684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Bjorn Lundahl, T. P. Leren, L. Ose, A. Hamsten, and F. Karpe
A Functional Polymorphism in the Promoter Region of the Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP -493G/T) Influences Lipoprotein Phenotype in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2000; 20(7): 1784 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. M. Clee, N. Bissada, F. Miao, L. Miao, A. D. Marais, H. E. Henderson, P. Steures, J. McManus, B. McManus, R. C. LeBoeuf, et al.
Plasma and vessel wall lipoprotein lipase have different roles in atherosclerosis
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2000; 41(4): 521 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. O. Akosah, E. Gower, L. Groon, B. L. Rooney, and A. Schaper
Mild hypercholesterolemia and premature heart disease: do the national criteria underestimate disease risk?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1178 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. E. Wittekoek, E. Moll, S. N. Pimstone, M. D. Trip, P. J. Lansberg, J. C. Defesche, J. J. van Doormaal, M. R. Hayden, and J. J. P. Kastelein
A Frequent Mutation in the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene (D9N) Deteriorates the Biochemical and Clinical Phenotype of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 2708 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittekoek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelein, J. J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wittekoek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kastelein, J. J. P.