Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:946-952

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.

(Circulation. 1998;98:946-952.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of Death

The Framingham Heart Study

Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM; Philip A. Wolf, MD; Ralph B. D'Agostino, PhD; Halit Silbershatz, PhD; William B. Kannel, MD; ; Daniel Levy, MD

From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, National Institutes of Health, Framingham, Mass (E.J.B., P.A.W., R.B.D., H.S., W.B.K., D.L.); Departments of Cardiology (E.J.B.), Preventive Medicine (E.J.B., P.A.W., D.L.), and Neurology (P.A.W.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; Department of Mathematics, Boston University (R.B.D., H.S.), Boston, Mass; Division of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass (D.L.); and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (D.L.).

Correspondence to Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, The Framingham Heart Study, 5 Thurber St, Framingham, MA 01702-6334. E-mail emelia{at}fram.nhlbi.nih.gov


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes substantial morbidity. It is uncertain whether AF is associated with excess mortality independent of associated cardiac conditions and risk factors.

Methods and Results—We examined the mortality of subjects 55 to 94 years of age who developed AF during 40 years of follow-up of the original Framingham Heart Study cohort. Of the original 5209 subjects, 296 men and 325 women (mean ages, 74 and 76 years, respectively) developed AF and met eligibility criteria. By pooled logistic regression, after adjustment for age, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, and stroke or transient ischemic attack, AF was associated with an OR for death of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8) in men and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2) in women. The risk of mortality conferred by AF did not significantly vary by age. However, there was a significant AF-sex interaction: AF diminished the female advantage in survival. In secondary multivariate analyses, in subjects free of valvular heart disease and preexisting cardiovascular disease, AF remained significantly associated with excess mortality, with about a doubling of mortality in both sexes.

Conclusions—In subjects from the original cohort of the Framingham Heart Study, AF was associated with a 1.5- to 1.9-fold mortality risk after adjustment for the preexisting cardiovascular conditions with which AF was related. The decreased survival seen with AF was present in men and women and across a wide range of ages.


Key Words: fibrillation, atrial • mortality • prognosis • stroke • cerebrovascular disorders • risk factors • aging


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic arrhythmia associated with an adverse prognosis. It is estimated that 2.2 million Americans have intermittent or sustained AF.1 The incidence of AF increases with advancing age, with an annual incidence per 1000 person-years of about 3.1 cases in men and 1.9 cases in women 55 to 64 years of age, rising to 38.0 and 31.4 cases in men and women 85 to 94 years of age.2 The clinical risk factors for AF include advancing age, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, rheumatic and nonrheumatic valve disease, and myocardial infarction.2 The echocardiographic risk factors for nonrheumatic AF include left atrial enlargement, increased left ventricular wall thickness, and reduced left ventricular fractional shortening.3 AF is an independent risk factor for stroke, resulting in an approximate 3- to 5-fold excess risk.4 Furthermore, whereas the attributable risks for most stroke risk factors decline with advancing age, the attributable risks for stroke associated with AF dramatically increase with age, from 1.5% for those 50 to 59 years of age to 23.5% for those 80 to 89 years of age.4

Although the morbidity of AF is well documented, it has not been clearly established whether AF per se results in excess mortality. The worsened survival seen with AF could reflect the increased mortality of the cardiovascular conditions with which it is associated. Using data from the Framingham Heart Study, we sought to ascertain the mortality associated with AF after adjusting for coexistent cardiac conditions and risk factors in a population-based sample.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The Framingham Heart Study was begun in 1948 to explore risk factors for and consequences of cardiovascular disease in a longitudinal population-based cohort. At entry, 5209 residents of Framingham, Mass, who were 28 to 62 years of age were enrolled. The subjects have received biennial examinations with routine assessment of medical history, physical examination, blood tests, and 12-lead ECGs. The examination procedures were approved by the Investigational Review Board of Boston Medical Center, and all subjects gave informed consent. Previous reports have outlined the study design, response rates, and completeness of follow-up.5 For the present study, we analyzed 40 years of follow-up. Subjects were excluded from analysis if they had AF at the first examination (n=19). Analyses were restricted to subjects 55 to 94 years of age at each biennial examination. AF was diagnosed if chronic or paroxysmal AF or atrial flutter was present on ECG. ECGs were obtained from the routine biennial Framingham Heart Study clinic examination or from outside hospitals and physicians.2

Definition of Clinical Covariables
Hypertension was considered present if the systolic blood pressure was at least 140 mm Hg or the diastolic blood pressure was >=90 mm Hg on each of 2 successive readings obtained by the clinic physician or if the subject was receiving antihypertensive medication.6 Diabetes was defined as a nonfasting blood glucose level >=11.11 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) or the use of insulin or an oral hypoglycemic agent. ECG left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed if a subject had voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy accompanied by lateral repolarization changes.7 Prevalent congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were determined by a panel of 3 physicians using previously published criteria.8 Because echocardiography was unavailable for the first 3 decades of the study, valvular heart disease was defined by auscultation criteria as any diastolic murmur or a >2 over 6 systolic murmur on Framingham Heart Study examination. The diagnosis of a stroke or transient ischemic attack was made by a panel of 3 investigators, including a neurologist, after they reviewed all records from relevant hospitalizations and clinic-reported events. Subjects suspected of having a cerebrovascular event were seen by a study neurologist in the hospital and in periodic follow-up.9

Statistical Analyses
The primary analysis examined the impact of AF on mortality in men and women using pooled logistic regression analysis.10 The pooled logistic regression analysis is equivalent to a Cox time-dependent regression analysis.10 The pooled logistic regression analyses allowed the covariates in the multivariate models to change over time, with the clinical variables redefined at every biennial examination. Missing data were imputed by substituting the most recent values as long as they were obtained within the 2 preceding examination cycles. Cardiovascular disease was defined as congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction (recognized or unrecognized), and stroke or transient ischemic attack; these events were redefined between biennial examinations as long as they occurred at or before the onset of AF. To assess the net effect of AF, we used multivariate models that adjusted for age, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, ECG left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, and stroke or transient ischemic attack unless otherwise specified.

To examine the influence of age and sex on AF mortality, interaction terms were introduced. To remove the impact of conditions with a high case-fatality rate, in 1 analysis, subjects were excluded if they died within 30 days of AF onset. Finally, to investigate whether the poor prognosis with AF was limited to subjects with valvular heart disease or preexisting cardiovascular disease, a multivariate analysis (adjusting for age, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, and left ventricular hypertrophy) was limited to subjects who were free of clinically apparent valvular heart disease, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or stroke or transient ischemic attack.

For descriptive purposes, we used a matched-cohort analysis. Approximately 2 subjects without AF were matched to each AF subject by age, sex, and date of diagnosis of AF (index examination cycle). The characteristics of the AF subjects and matched subjects without AF were defined at the baseline index examination. To describe the mortality after AF, a Kaplan-Meier analysis11 of the matched-cohort subjects was used to estimate survival and produce mortality curves. A log rank test was used to test the differences in survival between AF and matched non-AF participants.12 All analyses were sex specific and were performed with the Statistical Analysis System program13 on a Sun Sparc workstation.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
During up to 40 years of follow-up, 296 men (mean age, 73.7 years) and 325 women (mean age, 76.4 years) developed AF. Table 1Down displays the baseline characteristics of the AF and the age-, sex-, and calendar year–matched subjects without AF. Subjects with AF were significantly more likely than subjects without AF to have cardiovascular disease risk factors and preexisting disease at baseline, including hypertension, smoking, left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, and stroke or transient ischemic attack. In addition, women with AF were more likely to be diabetic.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects With and Matched Subjects Without AF

The Kaplan-Meier mortality curves are displayed in the FigureDown (top, subjects 55 to 74 years of age at baseline; bottom, subjects 75 to 94 years of age). For both the younger and older age groups, the mortality of men and women with AF was substantially greater than for the non-AF subjects (log rank test, all P<0.0001). At 10 years of follow-up, in the subjects 55 to 74 years of age, 61.5% of men with AF had died compared with 30.0% of men without AF; in women, 57.6% of those with AF had died compared with 20.9% of women without AF. Table 2Down details the mortality of AF and matched non-AF subjects by decade of age and sex. The median survival of men 55 to 64 years of age with AF was 12.6 years compared with 18.1 years in men without AF. Median survival was 12.1 years in women with AF and 21.3 years in women without AF. The excess mortality of the AF subjects was apparent within the first 30 days and persisted throughout follow-up. Furthermore, the excess mortality with AF was observed across all 4 decades of age studied.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Kaplan-Meier mortality curves for subjects 55 to 74 years of age. Vertical axis shows percent of subjects dead at follow-up (0% to 80%); horizontal axis, up to 10 years of follow-up. Subjects included men with AF (n=159), men without AF (n=318), women with AF (n=133), and women without AF (n=266). Both men and women with AF had significantly higher mortality than age-, sex-, and calendar year–matched non-AF subjects. Log rank test for men gave {chi}2=42.90 (P<0.0001); for women, {chi}2=70.93 (P<0.0001). B, Kaplan-Meier mortality curves for subjects 75 to 94 years of age. Vertical axis shows percent of subjects dead at follow-up (0% to 80%); horizontal axis, up to 5 years of follow-up. Results are shown for men with AF (n=137), men without AF (n=274), women with AF (n=192), and women without AF (n=384). Both men and women with AF had significantly higher mortality than age-, sex-, and calendar year–matched non-AF subjects. Log rank test for men gave {chi}2=51.44 (P<0.0001); for women, {chi}2=101.51 (P<0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Kaplan-Meier Death Rates in Subjects With and Matched Subjects Without AF

To estimate the excess mortality attributable to AF, pooled logistic regression analyses were undertaken (Table 3Down). For the pooled logistic regression analyses, 2149 men and 2714 women met eligibility criteria for inclusion at some point during follow-up. Age-adjusted ORs for death with AF were 2.4 in men and 3.5 in women. After multivariate adjustment, with risk factor status at each biennial examination taken into account, AF remained significantly associated with an increased risk of death; the OR with AF was 1.5 in men (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8) and 1.9 in women (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Impact of AF on Mortality: Pooled Logistic Regression Analyses

Further tests failed to reveal a significant interaction between age and AF with respect to mortality. The multivariate coefficients for an age-AF interaction were 0.00811 (P=0.49) in men and -0.00419 (P=0.69) in women, suggesting that the risk of death with AF did not significantly vary over the 4 decades of age studied. However, the risk of death in the setting of AF did vary by sex. With men and women combined, in a full multivariate model, there was a significant interaction between sex and AF with regard to mortality. The presence of AF made the sexes look similar for mortality: an OR of 1.2 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.49) for men versus women with AF compared with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7) for men versus women without AF.

Secondary analyses explored the impact of AF in subsets of subjects with AF (Table 3Up). With subjects who died within the first 30 days of follow-up eliminated, AF remained significantly associated with greater mortality in women (OR, 1.5) but not in men (OR, 1.1). Lastly, in an analysis limited to subjects initially free of clinically evident cardiovascular disease and valvular heart disease, AF was associated with a doubling in mortality (multivariate OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.8 to 3.3] in men and 2.2 [95% CI, 1.6 to 3.1] in women).

Cause of Death
The mortality rate in the first 30 days and 1 year for the AF subjects and matched subjects without AF are listed in Table 4Down. The excess mortality observed with AF appeared early; about 15% of subjects with AF died within 30 days of diagnosis. The cause-specific mortality at 1 year suggests that the distribution of the causes of death for the AF subjects was similar to that of the matched subjects without AF (Table 4Down). However, compared with matched subjects without AF, for each of the causes of death, a higher percentage of the AF subjects died in the first year after AF was diagnosed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Cause-Specific 1 Year Mortality in Subjects by AF Status


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
These population-based data indicate that subjects with AF have markedly reduced survival compared with subjects without AF, with risk factor–adjusted ORs for death of 1.5 and 1.9 in men and women, respectively. The multivariate analyses suggest that the greater mortality probably was attributable to AF, rather than reflecting the greater burden of risk factors and cardiovascular disease of AF subjects.

We performed secondary analyses to see whether the increased mortality risk was limited to subsets of subjects with AF. One possibility is that AF merely served as a marker for terminal illness. After elimination of 30-day mortality, AF remained associated with a 50% greater mortality in women. However, in men who survived 30 days after AF was diagnosed, AF was no longer significantly associated with increased mortality, suggesting that in men the worsened survival with AF was heavily influenced by early mortality. Another potential explanation is that the increased mortality of AF was confined to subjects with structural heart disease or more severe clinically evident cardiovascular events. When our analysis was limited to subjects free of baseline myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, and stroke or transient ischemic attack, AF was still associated with about a doubling in mortality.

Comparison With Previous Literature
Although few would consider AF a benign condition, it has remained unclear whether AF is associated with mortality independent of the coexisting conditions with which it is often observed. The risk of subsets of AF subjects with cardiovascular disease remains controversial. For example, some investigators have reported that after myocardial infarction, AF is associated with excess mortality,14 15 whereas others have not found an independent effect of AF on post–myocardial infarction mortality.16 17 Similarly, whether AF is an independent predictor of mortality in subjects with heart failure or stroke is also unclear, with some investigators reporting18 19 20 and others refuting21 22 23 an independent contribution of AF to mortality.

Evidence of mortality risk in broader series of AF subjects comes from several sources. Gajewski and Singer24 in 1981 examined insurance applicants and found that after 3.3 years of follow-up, applicants with chronic AF or paroxysmal AF in the setting of mitral stenosis or coronary artery disease had increased mortality. In a 1982 hospital-based study, Godtfredsen25 found that subjects with AF had a worse mortality compared with the general population. A number of cohort studies have also examined the issue, with samples ranging from male air force recruits26 to male civil servants27 to population-based samples.28 29 30 31 32 Given the diverse study designs, it is not surprising that the reported 1-year mortality has varied widely, from 2.6% in the Gajewski and Singer24 series describing insurance applicants with asymptomatic chronic AF to 16% in patients >70 years of age with AF detected on hospitalization.33 While 1 study found that the 1.9-fold mortality risk was not statistically significant,30 most studies have found that AF conferred excess risk of death,24 26 27 28 29 31 32 with a risk of all-cause mortality ranging from an adjusted relative risk of 1.326 to an unadjusted relative risk of 2.6.27

However, the studies of broader samples of AF subjects have been limited by a number of factors, including a small number of AF cases29 30 31 32 and the inclusion of prevalent AF cases.24 25 27 28 29 30 32 34 Prior studies have also had the disadvantages of being retrospective,24 25 34 case series,25 34 or case-control in design.28 30 Most of the prior studies have not shed light on possible sex differences in the mortality of AF because they have been all male cohorts26 27 or lacked sex-specific analyses.24 25 28 30 32 34 With regard to clarifying the independent impact of AF on mortality, the fundamental limitation of most prior studies was their lack of time-dependent or multivariate analyses.24 25 27 28 30 31 32 34

Study Strengths and Limitations
The Framingham Heart Study, by virtue of its longitudinal population-based design, has several advantages. The selection bias inherent in hospital-based series, prevalent AF series, or retrospective series was minimized. In the present series, ECGs were systematically ascertained on all subjects at each biennial examination and by review of outside hospital and physician records. Furthermore, the large number of subjects with AF contained in this series allowed us to analyze the mortality of AF over a broad age range and enabled the separate evaluation of the risk of death in men and women. To the best of our knowledge, the present investigation is the first to examine the relation between sex and AF mortality. We observed a significant interaction between AF mortality and sex, so that AF diminished the typical advantage women enjoy in survival. In addition, the routine collection of clinical history, physical examination, ECGs, and outside hospital records allowed multivariate adjustment for other factors, which may have contributed to the excess mortality seen with AF. A strength of the present study was that pooled logistic regression models were used so that the covariates in the multivariate model were updated at each biennial examination.

The study sample was largely white; our results may not be generalizable to other racial groups. Similarly, the results may not be relevant to subjects outside the age range studied (55 to 94 years of age), particularly younger subjects without any evidence of structural heart disease. In addition, we combined AF and atrial flutter, as well as chronic and paroxysmal AF; hence, we do not comment on differences in the prognosis of these AF subsets. Although the primary analysis controlled for covariates such as myocardial infarction, we were unable to control for infarct severity, which has been associated with risk for both AF and death. Most of the follow-up occurred before the availability of echocardiography and the widespread use of anticoagulants and antiarrhythmics for AF. The lack of routine echocardiography undoubtedly contributed to some misclassification of valvular heart disease. Moreover, we have insufficient data to comment on whether the mortality of AF is altered by anticoagulants35 or antiarrhythmics,36 as suggested by others. However, studies suggest that only about one third of eligible AF patients in the United States receive warfarin.37 38 Therefore, we believe that our mortality data may have relevance to most subjects with AF, given current treatment practices.

Clinical Implications
Several observations suggest that the burden of AF might be expected to rise. The population is aging, and the incidence of AF increases with advancing age.2 Furthermore, recently published data suggest that the prevalence of AF in the population is increasing even after accounting for age.39 AF is known to result in substantial morbidity, with a risk factor–adjusted 2.6- to 4.5-fold risk of stroke.4 The present study demonstrates that AF is independently associated with a 50% to 90% increase in the risk of death. The increased mortality was seen in men and women and was consistent across the 4 decades of age studied. Our investigation supports the contention that AF is associated with excess mortality, which persists after adjustment for coexisting cardiovascular conditions.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The Framingham Heart Study is supported in part through NIH/NHLBI contract NO1-HC-38038 and by NIH/NINDS grant 5-R01-NS-17950–16. We would like to thank David M. Pollak for editorial assistance and Mary Healy, Karen Mutalik, Lois Abel, Lynne McDonald, Kathy Ryder, MD, and Colleen Sam, MD, for assistance in the collection of AF cases.

Received January 23, 1998; revision received April 21, 1998; accepted May 3, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:469–473.[Abstract]
  2. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994;271:840–844.[Abstract]
  3. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;89:724–730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dawber TR, Kannel WB, Lyell LP. An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: the Framingham Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963;107:539–556.
  6. Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154–183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offutt D. Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram: prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1969;71:89–105.
  8. Shurtleff D. Some characteristics related to the incidence of cardiovascular disease and death: Framingham study, 18-year follow-up. In: Kannel WB, Gordon T, eds. The Framingham Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1974. DHEW publication NIH 74–599.
  9. Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB. Survival following initial cardiovascular events: 30 year follow-up. In: Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Garrison RJ, eds. The Framingham Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease. Bethesda, Md: NHLBI, NIH; 1988.
  10. D'Agostino RB, Lee ML, Belanger AJ, Cupples LA, Anderson K, Kannel WB. Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study. Stat Med. 1990;9:1501–1515.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.
  12. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1980.
  13. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1990:4.
  14. Crenshaw BS, Ward SR, Granger CB, Stebbins AL, Topol EJ, Califf RM, for the GUSTO-I Trial Investigators. Atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: the GUSTO-I experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:406–413.[Abstract]
  15. Sakata K, Kurihara H, Iwamori K, Maki A, Yoshino H, Yanagisawa A, Ishikawa K. Clinical and prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1522–1527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Goldgerg RJ, Seeley D, Becker RC, Brady P, Chen Z, Osganian V, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the in-hospital and long-term survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. Am Heart J. 1990;119:996–1001.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Behar S, Tanne D, Zion M, Reicher-Reiss H, Kaplinsky E, Caspi A, Palant A, Goldbourt U, for the SPRINT Study Group. Incidence and prognostic significance of chronic atrial fibrillation among 5,839 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:816–818.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Middlekauff HR, Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW. Prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in advanced heart failure: a study of 390 patients. Circulation. 1991;84:40–48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. Stroke. 1996;27:1760–1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1765–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Carson PE, Johnson GR, Dunkman WB, Fletcher RD, Farrell L, Cohn JN, for the V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. The influence of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in mild to moderate heart failure: the V-HeFT studies. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl VI):VI-102–VI-110.
  22. Keogh AM, Baron DW, Hickie JB. Prognostic guides in patients with idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy assessed for cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:903–908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Censori B, Camerlingo M, Casto L, Ferraro B, Gazzaniga GC, Cesana B, Mamoli A. Prognostic factors in first-ever stroke in the carotid artery territory seen within 6 hours after onset. Stroke. 1993;24:532–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gajewski J, Singer RB. Mortality in an insured population with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 1981;245:1540–1544.[Abstract]
  25. Godtfredsen J. Atrial fibrillation: course and prognosis: a follow-up study of 1212 cases. In: Kulbertus HE, Olsson SB, Schlepper M, eds. Atrial Fibrillation. Molndal, Sweden: AB Hassle; 1982:134–145.
  26. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba follow-up study. Am J Med. 1995;98:476–484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Flegel KM, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Risk of stroke in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 1987;1:526–529.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kulbertus HE, Leval-Rutten F, Bartsch P, Petit JM. Atrial fibrillation in elderly, ambulatory patients. In: Kulbertus HE, Olsson SB, Schlepper M, eds. Atrial Fibrillation. Molndal, Sweden: AB Hassle; 1982:148–157.
  29. Lake FR, Cullen KJ, de Klerk NH, McCall MG, Rosman DL. Atrial fibrillation and mortality in an elderly population. Aust N Z J Med. 1989;19:321–326.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Onundarson PT, Thorgeirsson G, Jonmundsson E, Sigfusson N, Hardarson T. Chronic atrial fibrillation: epidemiologic features and 14 year follow-up: a case control study. Eur Heart J. 1987;8:521–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1018–1022.[Abstract]
  32. Kitchin AH, Milne JS. Longitudinal survey of ischaemic heart disease in randomly selected sample of older population. Br Heart J. 1977;39:889–893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Petersen P, Godtfredsen J. Atrial fibrillation: a review of course and prognosis. Acta Med Scand. 1984;216:5–9.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Stroud WD, Laplace LB, Reisinger JA. The etiology, prognosis and treatment of auricular fibrillation. Am J Med Sci. 1932;183:48–60.
  35. Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1449–1457.[Abstract]
  36. Coplen SE, Antman EM, Berlin JA, Hewitt P, Chalmers TC. Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials [published erratum appears in Circulation. 1991;83:714] [see comments]. Circulation. 1990;82:1106–1116.
  37. Stafford RS, Singer DE. National patterns of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2537–2541.[Abstract]
  38. Stafford RS, Singer DE. Recent national patterns of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;97:1231–1233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, D'Agostino RB. Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1996;131:790–795.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Grubitzsch, C. Grabow, H. Orawa, and W. Konertz
Factors predicting the time until atrial fibrillation recurrence after concomitant left atrial ablation.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Matyal
Newly Appreciated Pathophysiology of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women Mandates Changes in Perioperative Management: A Core Review
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 37 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Hippisley-Cox, C. Coupland, Y. Vinogradova, J. Robson, R. Minhas, A. Sheikh, and P. Brindle
Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2
BMJ, June 28, 2008; 336(7659): 1475 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Roy, M. Talajic, S. Nattel, D. G. Wyse, P. Dorian, K. L. Lee, M. G. Bourassa, J. M. O. Arnold, A. E. Buxton, A. J. Camm, et al.
Rhythm Control versus Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., June 19, 2008; 358(25): 2667 - 2677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
E. Hertervig, O. Kongstad, E. Ljungstrom, B. Olsson, and S. Yuan
Pulmonary vein potentials in patients with and without atrial fibrillation
Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 692 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. D. Vagaonescu, A. C. Wilson, and J. B. Kostis
Atrial Fibrillation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program and Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program-Extension Study
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1552 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G.-R. Li, H.-B. Wang, G.-W. Qin, M.-W. Jin, Q. Tang, H.-Y. Sun, X.-L. Du, X.-L. Deng, X.-H. Zhang, J.-B. Chen, et al.
Acacetin, a Natural Flavone, Selectively Inhibits Human Atrial Repolarization Potassium Currents and Prevents Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs
Circulation, May 13, 2008; 117(19): 2449 - 2457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Nieuwlaat, M. H. Prins, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, P. E. Vardas, E. Aliot, M. Santini, S. M. Cobbe, J. W.M.G. Widdershoven, L. H. Baur, S. Levy, et al.
Prognosis, disease progression, and treatment of atrial fibrillation patients during 1 year: follow-up of the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1181 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. Freestone, F. Gustafsson, A. Y. Chong, P. Corell, C. Kistorp, P. Hildebrandt, and G. Y. H. Lip
Influence of Atrial Fibrillation on Plasma Von Willebrand Factor, Soluble E-Selectin, and N-Terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Systolic Heart Failure
Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1203 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. A. Lutomsky, T. Rostock, A. Koops, D. Steven, K. Mullerleile, H. Servatius, I. Drewitz, D. Ueberschar, T. Plagemann, R. Ventura, et al.
Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging
Europace, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 593 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
G Y H Lip and C J Boos
Antithrombotic treatment in atrial fibrillation
Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 2008; 84(991): 252 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Darbar, P. J. Kannankeril, B. S. Donahue, G. Kucera, T. Stubblefield, J. L. Haines, A. L. George Jr, and D. M. Roden
Cardiac Sodium Channel (SCN5A) Variants Associated with Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, April 15, 2008; 117(15): 1927 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Q. Cui, L. B. Sun, Y. Li, C. L. Xu, J. Han, H. Li, and X. Meng
Intraoperative Modified Cox Mini-Maze Procedure for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1283 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. Asbach, M. Olschewski, T. S. Faber, M. Zehender, C. Bode, and M. Brunner
Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation has significantly decreased during the last three decades: 35 years of follow-up in 1627 pacemaker patients
Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 391 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. S. Taggar, F. Marin, and G. Y.H. Lip
Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation: improving or not?
Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 389 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Sakabe, A. Shiroshita-Takeshita, A. Maguy, B. J.J.M. Brundel, A. Fujiki, H. Inoue, and S. Nattel
Effects of a heat shock protein inducer on the atrial fibrillation substrate caused by acute atrial ischaemia
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2008; 78(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Darbar, A. Hardy, J. L. Haines, and D. M. Roden
Prolonged signal-averaged P-wave duration as an intermediate phenotype for familial atrial fibrillation.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1083 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Watanabe, N. Tanabe, T. Watanabe, D. Darbar, D. M. Roden, S. Sasaki, and Y. Aizawa
Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Development of Atrial Fibrillation: The Niigata Preventive Medicine Study
Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1255 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
H. Soran, N. Younis, P. Currie, J. Silas, I.R. Jones, and G. Gill
Influence of diabetes on the maintenance of sinus rhythm after a successful direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation
QJM, March 1, 2008; 101(3): 181 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
Z. Taimur and S. Hussaini
Atrial fibrillation in a commercial diver
Occup. Med., March 1, 2008; 58(2): 144 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Grubitzsch, A. Menes, D. Modersohn, and W. Konertz
The Role of Atrial Remodeling for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 474 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
L. Mont, D. Tamborero, R. Elosua, I. Molina, B. Coll-Vinent, M. Sitges, B. Vidal, A. Scalise, A. Tejeira, A. Berruezo, et al.
Physical activity, height, and left atrial size are independent risk factors for lone atrial fibrillation in middle-aged healthy individuals
Europace, January 4, 2008; (2008) eum263v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Arriagada, A. Berruezo, L. Mont, D. Tamborero, I. Molina, B. Coll-Vinent, B. Vidal, M. Sitges, P. Berne, J. Brugada, et al.
Predictors of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with lone atrial fibrillation
Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. K. Voeller, R. B. Schuessler, and R. J. Damiano Jr.
Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1375 - 1394.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. G. Cosio, E. Aliot, G. L. Botto, H. Heidbuchel, C. J. Geller, P. Kirchhof, J.-C. De Haro, R. Frank, J. P. Villacastin, J. Vijgen, et al.
Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode
Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 21 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. Ferro, L. Loffredo, L. Polimeni, F. Fimognari, P. Villari, P. Pignatelli, V. Fuster, and F. Violi
Soluble CD40 Ligand Predicts Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2763 - 2768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Europace