Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:1762-1768

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, C. I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, M. I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, C. I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, M. I. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Atrial Fibrillation

(Circulation. 1998;98:1762-1768.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Myocardial Contractility Is Not Constant During Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation in Patients

Carl I. O. Brookes, MBBS, MRCP; Paul A. White, PhD; Maurice Staples; Paul J. Oldershaw, MD, MRCP; Andrew N. Redington, MD, MRCP; Peter D. Collins, MD, MRCP; ; Mark I. M. Noble, DSc, MD

Correspondence to Prof M.I.M. Noble, 5E3, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, UK. E-mail m.mansaray{at}cxwms.ac.uk


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—The variation in stroke volume and pulse pressure characteristic of atrial fibrillation is usually ascribed to time-dependent ventricular filling, implying a single positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume, which defines a single state of myocardial contractility. We tested the hypothesis that contractility also varies.

Methods and Results—We measured the left ventricular pressure and volume continuously with a conductance catheter with catheter-tip micromanometer introduced retrogradely into the left ventricle. The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was determined in 6 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization for diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The normal positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume was found in the control patients, but no such positive relationship was found in any patient in atrial fibrillation. In the latter, the slopes of the linear regressions were either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative (r values <0.08), both results indicating a change in contractility from beat to beat. Significantly negative relationships were found between end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval (-0.82<r<-0.24), indicating the presence of mechanical restitution. Significantly positive relationships were found between end-systolic volume and the R-R interval before the preceding R-R interval (0.35<r<0.74), indicating the presence of postextrasystolic potentiation.

Conclusions—Myocardial contractility is constantly changing from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation because of the influence of the force-interval relationships.


Key Words: arrhythmia • cardiac volume • hemodynamics • intervals • ventricles • mechanics


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Beat-to-beat changes in the pulse pressure and stroke volume during atrial fibrillation have largely been attributed to variations in ventricular filling1 2 and a modifying influence of aortic diastolic pressure.3 However, a role for an inherent inotropic mechanism (an effect on myocardial contractility) caused by changes in interval between beats has also been postulated.4 Interest in this interval-force relationship during atrial fibrillation in huans has been of increasing recent interest.5 6 7 This is an interval-dependent variation in the concentration of calcium ions released to the contractile proteins on activation.8 9

The difficulty in assessing definitively the role of force-interval effects is that indices often used to reflect them are also sensitive to changes in end-diastolic volume, which also changes from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation. Effects caused by such changes in filling are, by definition, not inotropic but rather due to the Frank-Starling mechanism.10 This difficulty is particularly the case with studies of the influence of mechanical restitution. Mechanical restitution is the relationship between the force of a beat and its preceding interval and is always seen in mammalian cardiac preparations, such as isolated myocytes and isolated trabeculae; there is an increase in the force of contraction as the stimulus interval lengthens until restitution is complete (in humans and most mammals, at {approx}800 to 1000 ms).11 12 13 14 15 In such preparations, initial muscle length can be kept constant, but in the intact human, with increasing interval, end-diastolic volume also increases progressively and increases force of contraction by means of the Frank-Starling mechanism.

There are 2 other interval-strength effects: (1) postextrasystolic potentiation,5 6 7 which is the phenomenon responsible for the strong contractions after the interval that follows a short interval16 (it has previously been demonstrated that such postextrasystolic potentiation contributes to pulse variation during atrial fibrillation6), and (2) the decay of postextrasystolic potentiation, which has a time course of several beats.17

The present study explores the hypothesis that the beat-by-beat hemodynamic changes of atrial fibrillation are associated with beat-by-beat changes in contractility. We recorded beat-by-beat changes in left ventricular pressure-volume loops in atrial fibrillation patients during cardiac catheterization and then constructed end-systolic pressure-volume relationships.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial Fibrillation Studies
Six unselected patients with chronic atrial fibrillation without aortic or mitral valve disease were studied at cardiac catheterization after diagnostic angiography (Table 1Down). In accordance with the Helsinki agreement, the study was subject to local ethical committee approval, and all patients had given signed informed consent. The only patients specifically excluded from the study were patients with valve prostheses; those with aortic valve disease, in whom passage of the study catheter across a diseased valve could have been hazardous; and those with mitral regurgitation, because this would have prejudiced the isovolumic contraction period. Apart from these exclusions, we studied unselected patients entering the catheter laboratory who had atrial fibrillation with clinical features summarized in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Details

Protocol
Patients fasted on the day of the procedure, omitting regular medication. There was therefore a minimum period of 12 hours since the last dose of any drug and >24 hours for once-daily drugs. This allowed half-decay of concentration of those drugs affecting myocardial contractility, the slowest decay being of once-daily digoxin. Patients received 10 mg temazepam 1 hour before the study or no premedication. A 7F conductance catheter was used, with a 2.5F micromanometer inserted through the central lumen. The catheter was introduced into the left ventricle from the right femoral artery under fluoroscopy and was positioned so that the distal electrode was in the apex of the left ventricle and the proximal electrode at the aortic valve orifice; this gave simultaneous recordings of left ventricular pressure and volume. These signals, together with the ECG, were recorded during quiet respiration onto a personal computer over periods of several minutes and were subsequently analyzed with dedicated software.

Equipment
The principles of the conductance method to estimate left ventricular volume have been described in detail elsewhere.18 19 Briefly, this method is based on the measurement of the conductivity of blood within the ventricular cavity. The conductance catheter has a series of 8 equally spaced electrodes at its distal end, all of which sit within the left ventricle. This catheter is connected to a signal processing and conditioning unit (Cardiodynamics), which applies a 20-kHz, 30-µA alternating current between the proximal and distal electrodes. The remaining 6 electrodes are used to measure a time-varying ventricular conductance, G(t), as the sum of 5 segments. The relationship between the varying volume, V(t), and the time-varying conductance, G(t), is given by the simple formula V(t)=1/{alpha} · L2 · r[G(t)-G(p)], where the V(t) is the volume as a function of time, {alpha} is the ratio of the conductance-derived volume to true ventricular volume, L is the interelectrode distance, r is the resistivity of blood in {Omega}/cm, G(t) is the time-varying conductance, and G(p) is the parallel conductance due to the conductance of structures outside the ventricular blood pool. An "offset volume," Vc, is related to this parallel conductance by Vc=1/{alpha} · L2 · r(Gp) and was estimated by the hypertonic saline injection technique.

Pressure and volume signals were optimized, calibrated, recorded, and displayed continuously as functions of each other to give pressure-volume cycles. After the correct phase relations of all segmental volumes were ensured, data were collected and total volume was derived from the sum of segmental volumes. The micromanometer was zeroed to atmospheric pressure at midchest level and calibrated against a standard signal from an amplifier.

Conductance-derived ventricular volume was related to true left ventricular volume measured in 2 different ways: (1) in the atrial fibrillation patients by cineangiography (with measured magnification factors permitting calculation of left ventricular volume by the method of Dodge et al20) and (2) in the control patients by comparing conductance stroke volumes with thermodilution-derived stroke volumes. Although the use of 2 different methods for estimating absolute ventricular volume may create a systematic error between the 2 patient groups, this study is concerned primarily with beat-to-beat variations in volume within individual patients, thus making this potential error irrelevant.

Data Acquisition and Analysis
The conductance-derived volume signal was generated and processed by a Sigma 5DF signal conditioning and processing unit (Leycom) using a value of blood resistivity determined immediately before each data acquisition. It was transferred directly into custom software in a dedicated microcomputer through a 12-bit, 16-channel analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (DT 282 Data Translation). Segmental volumes were checked for phase relation to simultaneous pressure and intracavity ECG signals and centered in the A/D ranges. Conductance-derived volumes were displayed and recorded and were later corrected to true volumes by off-line computer, in accordance with the procedures described in the previous section. The pressure signal was imported directly into the same software as the volume signal and displayed and recorded in real time.

End systole was defined as the time at which the ratio of pressure to volume was maximal; pressure and volume at this time were added, for each beat, into a Microsoft Excel file as end-systolic pressure and volume. Other variables determined and entered into the Excel file were heart rate, end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, and maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dtmax).

The relationships between end-systolic pressure and volume were determined by linear regression and by Spearman rank correlation by use of InStat (Graph Pad Inc). The latter was done in anticipation that some data sets might be nonlinear. Linear regression and Spearman rank correlation were also carried out between (dependent variable first) (1) end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval, (2) end-systolic volume and prepreceding R-R interval, (3) LV dP/dtmax and preceding R-R interval, and (4) LV dP/dtmax and prepreceding R-R interval.

Control Studies
To ensure that the previously described unique positive pressure-volume relationship was obtained in our hands with the above methods, we subjected to similar analysis pressure-volume data from patients in sinus rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic operations for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Pressure-volume curves were performed in these surgical patients as part of a separate study to examine the effects of L-arginine on postoperative left ventricular performance. The data given are baseline data from patients before any intervention or L-arginine administration. We present these data only to demonstrate that, in our hands, the end-systolic pressure-volume curve is the same as published by others. Left ventricular volume changes were achieved by variation in the venous return by means of vena caval slings. These patients are described in Table 1Up.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Satisfactory pressure-volume loops were recorded in 6 atrial fibrillation patients and 4 control patients. A typical sequence of beats, showing the great variability of volume and pressure with R-R interval change from beat to beat, is shown in Figure 1BDown and compared with sinus rhythm in Figure 1ADown.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representative recordings of left ventricular pressure-volume loops in (A) a patient in sinus rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (volume variation achieved by caval occlusion) and (B) a patient in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Typical data sets for a control patient and an atrial fibrillation patient are shown in Figure 2ADown and 2BDown. All results for end-systolic pressure-volume relationships are summarized in Table 2Down. In the control patients, these 2 variables were extremely tightly and positively correlated in accordance with previous reports; this indicates that our standard pressure-volume methodology yields the same result in sinus rhythm that was previously established.21 22 23 The correlations between end-systolic volume and pressure in atrial fibrillation were either statistically nonsignificant or significantly negative. This means that during atrial fibrillation, the end-systolic pressure-volume points are jumping from beat to beat from one positive pressure-volume relation to another, ie, each beat has a different contractility. The results in all patients are consistent with this behavior.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Representative end-systolic pressure-volume plots in (A) a patient in sinus rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic surgery and (B) a patient in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Statistical Results

We reasoned that arterial pressure with its baroreceptor control was achieving a measure of end-systolic pressure clamp and that the contractility changes were manifest primarily as end-systolic volume variation. We therefore used end-systolic volume as a negative index of contractility for beat-to-beat analysis.

The variation in end-systolic volume showed statistically significant negative relations with the preceding interval (Figure 3Down, Table 3Down), ie, the longer the preceding interval, the more the left ventricle emptied. As expected, there was some scatter that precluded distinction in most cases between linear and nonlinear relationships (Table 3Down); the scatter is due to the other force-interval effects (see introduction) but did not obscure the presence of an end-systolic volume/preceding interval relationship. The data in Figure 3Down are fitted by a 2-phase exponential decay curve fit (Prism, Graph Pad Inc), in line with mechanical restitution in isolated cardiac muscle preparations.12 14 24 25



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval. As preceding interval gets longer, left ventricle empties more.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Statistical Results

The variation in end-systolic volume also showed statistically significant positive relations with prepreceding interval (Figure 4Down, Table 3Up); ie, the shorter the interval before the preceding interval, the more the left ventricle emptied. The effect of scatter due to other force-interval effects was similar to that for mechanical restitution (Table 3Up). The data in Figure 4Down are fitted by a single exponential association curve fit (Prism, Graph Pad Inc) in accordance with previous data on interval dependence of postextrasystolic potentiation.13 26



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between end-systolic volume and interval before preceding interval. As prepreceding interval gets shorter, left ventricle empties more.

The presence of positive relationships between LV dP/dtmax and preceding R-R interval were shown by significant positive correlations (Figure 5Down, Table 4Down); this confirms previous findings, but our data showed more scatter due to the absence of "gating,"27 a process by which data with short prepreceding intervals are excluded. The increase in LV dP/dtmax with preceding interval was associated with increasing end-diastolic volume; the result therefore does not confirm the presence of mechanical restitution. The presence of negative relationships between LV dP/dtmax and prepreceding interval (Figure 6Down, Table 4Down) confirms previous findings.6 In this case, LV dP/dtmax is not associated with end-diastolic volume, so that the result does indicate the presence of postextrasystolic potentiation.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dtmax) and preceding R-R interval.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Statistical Results



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dtmax) and R-R interval before preceding interval.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of this study disprove the hypothesis that the beat-to-beat changes in hemodynamics during atrial fibrillation are entirely due to changes in left ventricular filling, because this hypothesis would require myocardial contractility to be constant, ie, end-systolic pressure and volume would lie along a single positive relationship. This is clearly not the case (Figures 1Up and 2Up; Table 2Up).

It was not our intention to use the data from the control patients for comparison but rather simply to show that the same research team performing the atrial fibrillation study, with the same apparatus, could reproduce the type of results frequently confirmed in the literature (Figure 1AUp). Indeed, these patients could not be compared with the atrial fibrillation patients, because the former had normal contractile function and were studied below the physiological range of volume, resulting in good tracings (Figure 1AUp). By contrast, the atrial fibrillation patients had variably poor left ventricular function and were studied over a much larger range of volumes, leading to less stable loops and evidence of incoordinate contraction during the isovolumic contraction and relaxation periods (Figure 1BUp).

The conclusion that contractility is not constant from beat to beat might be expected, in view of earlier findings that postextrasystolic potentiation occurs during atrial fibrillation.6 However, we have also shown that as the preceding interval gets longer, the left ventricle empties more (Figure 3Up, Table 3Up). The main determinant of end-systolic volume is the end-systolic pressure, ie, a decrease in end-systolic pressure causes a decrease in end-systolic volume. In the case of the relationships explored in our atrial fibrillation patients, however, as the preceding interval gets longer, the end-systolic pressure remains more or less constant. We suggest that this is because it is determined by systolic arterial pressure and that this is determined, in turn, by baroreceptor and other reflexes that buffer arterial pressure and keep it more or less constant. We therefore suggest that the only way in which end-systolic volume could have got smaller as preceding interval increased is by leftward shifts of the end-systolic pressure-volume curve, ie, increasing myocardial contractility.21 22 23

If this argument is accepted, we can confirm that the result (Figure 3Up) indicated the presence of mechanical restitution during beat-to-beat changes in atrial fibrillation. This could not be definitively shown previously by use of LV dP/dtmax (Figure 5Up),27 if one assumes that that index is sensitive to the accompanying changes in end-diastolic volume.

An even greater difficulty encountered in a previous study27 involved the attempt to claim that stroke volume is also influenced by mechanical restitution. Together with previous studies,6 7 28 these authors claimed that the amplitude of hemodynamic variables in atrial fibrillation is modified by the cumulative influences of interval-force relationships, comprising mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation and its decay. However, end-diastolic volume clearly increases with increasing preceding interval, and in our data set, there was always a significant positive correlation between stroke volume and end-diastolic volume, confirming the contribution of the Frank-Starling mechanism to the stroke volume/preceding interval relationship shown previously.27 Our finding of a decrease in end-systolic volume with increasing preceding interval (Figure 3Up, Table 3Up) clearly indicates, for the first time, that contractility change does contribute to the stroke volume dependence on preceding interval.

The findings of this study are entirely consistent with earlier animal models of atrial fibrillation in which the effects of interval and volume could be more easily separated, and preceding as well as prepreceding interval was shown to be an important determinant of varying contractile function.29 30 31 Edmands and colleagues32 induced experimental atrial fibrillation in dogs and related the rate of change of tension (from strain gauges stitched into the left ventricular free wall) to pulse pressure. They found that the inotropic variation correlated better with pulse pressure than did either end-diastolic pressure or filling time. More recently, using a computerized nuclear probe to assess relative change in ventricular volume during atrial fibrillation, Gosselink et al7 concluded that "the interval force relation explains the varying left ventricular performance during atrial fibrillation over the entire range of R-R intervals," and that "the contribution of the Frank Starling mechanism to varying left ventricular performance during atrial fibrillation remains a matter of doubt and debate." In view of the positive relationship between stroke volume and end-diastolic volume in our patients with atrial fibrillation, we would rather conclude that both mechanisms contribute to the beat-to-beat variations in stroke volume.


*    Footnotes
 
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Royal Brompton and Charing Cross Hospitals, London, UK.

Received March 3, 1998; revision received May 27, 1998; accepted May 31, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lewis T. Fibrillation of the auricles: its effects upon the circulation. J Exp Med. 1912;16:395–420.[Abstract]

2. Braunwald E, Frye RL, Aygen MM, Gilbert JW. Studies on Starling's law of the heart, III: observations in patients with mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation on the relationships between end diastolic segment length, filling pressure, and characteristics of ventricular contraction. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:1874–1884.

3. Einthoven W, Korteweg AJ. On the variability of the size of the pulse in cases of auricular fibrillation. Heart. 1915;6:107–120.

4. Wenckebach L. Die Arrythmie als Ausdruck bestimmter Funktionsstörungen des Herzens. In: Leipzig, 1903.

5. Karliner JS, Gault JH, Bouchard R, Holzer J. Factors influencing the ejection fraction and the mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening during atrial fibrillation in man. Cardiovasc Res. 1974;8:18–25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Hardman SMC, Noble MIM, Seed WA. Postextrasystolic potentiation and its contribution to the beat-to-beat variation of the pulse during atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1992;86:1223–1232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Gosselink ATM, Blanksma PK, Crijns HJGM, van Gelder IC, de Kam PJ, Hillege HL, Niemeijer MG, Lie KI, Meijler FL. Left ventricular beat-to-beat performance in atrial fibrillation: contribution of Frank-Starling mechanism after short rather than long RR intervals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1516–1521.[Abstract]

8. Allen DG, Kurihara S. Calcium transients in mammalian ventricular muscle. Eur Heart J. 1980;1(suppl A):5–15.

9. Wier WG, Yue DT. Intracellular calcium transients underlying the short-term force-interval relationship in ferret ventricular myocardium. J Physiol. 1986;376:507–530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. ter Keurs HEDJ, Noble MIM. Starling's Law of the Heart Revisited. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1988.

11. Burkhoff D, Yue DT, Franz MR, Hunter WC, Sagawa K. Mechanical restitution of isolated perfused canine left ventricles. Am J Physiol. 1984;246:H8–H16.

12. Cooper IC, Fry CH. Mechanical restitution in isolated mammalian myocardium: species differences and underlying mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1990;22:439–452.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Elzinga G, Lab MJ, Noble MIM, Papadoyannis DE, Pidgeon J, Seed A, Wohlfart B. The action potential duration and contractile response of the intact heart related to the preceding interval and the preceding beat in the dog and cat. J Physiol. 1981;314:481–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Edman KAP, Johannsson M. The contractile state of rabbit papillary muscle in relation to stimulation frequency. J Physiol. 1976;254:565–581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Pidgeon J, Miller GAH, Noble MIM, Papadoyannis D, Seed WA. The relationship between the strength of the human heart beat and the interval between beats. Circulation. 1982;65:1404–1410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Noble MIM, Seed WA. The Interval-Force Relationship of the Heart: Bowditch Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

17. ter Keurs HEDJ, Gao WD, Bosker H, Drake-Holland AJ, Noble MIM. Characterisation of the decay of frequency induced potentiation and of post extrasystolic potentiation. Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:903–910.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Baan J, Aouw Jong TT, Kerkhof PLM, Moene RJ, Van Dijk AD, Van der Velde ET, Koop J. Continuous stroke volume and cardiac output from intra-ventricular dimensions obtained with the impedance catheter. Cardiovasc Res. 1981;15:328–334.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Baan J, Van der Velde ET, Debruin HG, Smeenk GJ, Koops J, Van Dijk AD, Temmerman D, Senden PJ, Buis B. Continuous measurement of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by conductance catheter. Circulation. 1984;70:812–833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, Lord DJ. The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1960;60:762–776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Weber KT, Janicki JS, Hefner LL. Left ventricular force-length relations of isovolumic and ejecting contractions. Am J Physiol. 1976;231:337–343.

22. Sagawa K. The ventricular pressure-volume diagram revisited. Circ Res. 1978;43:677–687.[Free Full Text]

23. Sagawa K. The end-systolic pressure-volume relation of the ventricle: definition, modifications and clinical use. Circulation. 1981;63:1223–1227.[Free Full Text]

24. Braveny P, Kruta V. Dissociation de deux facteurs: restitution et potentiation dans l'action de l'intervalle sur l'amplitude de la contraction du myocarde. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1958;74:169–178.

25. Johannsson M. Mechanical restitution in cardiac muscle. In: Noble MIM, Seed WA, eds. The Interval-Force Relationship of the Heart: Bowditch Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992:227–244.

26. Seed WA, Noble MIM, Walker JM, Miller GAH, Pidgeon J, Redwood D, Wanless R, Franz MR, Schoettler M. Relationships between beat to beat interval and the strength of contraction in the healthy and diseased human heart. Circulation. 1984;70:799–805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hardman SMC, Noble MIM, Biggs T, Seed WA. Evidence for an influence of mechanical restitution on beat-to-beat variations in haemodynamics during spontaneous atrial fibrillation in patients. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;38:82–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Hardman SMC, Pfeiffer KP, Kenner T, Noble MIM, Seed WA. Analysis of left ventricular contractile behaviour during atrial fibrillation. Basic Res Cardiol. 1994;89:438–455.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Meijler FL, Strackee J, van Capelle FJL, du Perron JC. Computer analysis of the RR interval-contractility relationship during random stimulation of the isolated heart. Circ Res. 1968;22:695–702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Meijler F, Bogaard Fvd, Tweel Lvd, Durrer D. Post-extrasystolic potentiation in the isolated rat heart. Am J Physiol. 1962;202:631–635.

31. Rogel S, Mahler Y. Myocardial tension in atrial fibrillation. J Appl Physiol. 1969;27:822–825.[Free Full Text]

32. Edmands RE, Greenspan K, Fisch C. The role of inotropic variation in ventricular function during atrial fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 1970;49:738–749.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 854 - 906.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 700 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1979 - 2030.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Mohri, J. Shimizu, G. Iribe, H. Ito, T. Morita, H. Yamaguchi, S. Sano, F. Kajiya, and H. Suga
Normal distribution of ventricular pressure-volume area of arrhythmic beats under atrial fibrillation in canine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1740 - H1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. B. Popovic', K. A. Mowrey, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, R. A. Grimm, J. D. Thomas, and T. N. Mazgalev
Slow rate during AF improves ventricular performance by reducing sensitivity to cycle length irregularity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2706 - H2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Takagaki, P M McCarthy, M Chung, J Connor, R Dessoffy, Y Ochiai, M Howard, K Doi, M Kopcak, T N Mazgalev, et al.
Preload-adjusted maximal power: a novel index of left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation
Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 170 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1852 - 1923.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al.
ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1266 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M I M NOBLE
Beat to beat left ventricular performance in spontaneous atrial fibrillation does not depend on afterload
Heart, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 89 - 89.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, C. I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, M. I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, C. I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, M. I. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Atrial Fibrillation