| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence to Prof M.I.M. Noble, 5E3, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, UK. E-mail m.mansaray{at}cxwms.ac.uk
Methods and ResultsWe measured the left ventricular
pressure and volume continuously with a conductance catheter with
catheter-tip micromanometer introduced retrogradely
into the left ventricle. The end-systolic pressure-volume
relationship was determined in 6 patients in atrial fibrillation
undergoing cardiac catheterization for
diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm
undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The normal
positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume
was found in the control patients, but no such positive relationship
was found in any patient in atrial fibrillation. In the latter, the
slopes of the linear regressions were either not significantly
different from zero or significantly negative (r values
<0.08), both results indicating a change in
contractility from beat to beat. Significantly negative
relationships were found between end-systolic volume and
preceding R-R interval (-0.82<r<-0.24), indicating
the presence of mechanical restitution. Significantly positive
relationships were found between end-systolic volume and the
R-R interval before the preceding R-R interval
(0.35<r<0.74), indicating the presence of
postextrasystolic potentiation.
ConclusionsMyocardial contractility is
constantly changing from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation because of
the influence of the force-interval relationships.
The difficulty in assessing definitively the role of
force-interval effects is that indices often used to reflect them are
also sensitive to changes in end-diastolic volume, which
also changes from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation. Effects caused
by such changes in filling are, by definition, not inotropic but rather
due to the Frank-Starling mechanism.10 This
difficulty is particularly the case with studies of the influence of
mechanical restitution. Mechanical restitution is the relationship
between the force of a beat and its preceding interval and is always
seen in mammalian cardiac preparations, such as isolated myocytes and
isolated trabeculae; there is an increase in the force of
contraction as the stimulus interval lengthens until restitution is
complete (in humans and most mammals, at
There are 2 other interval-strength effects: (1)
postextrasystolic
potentiation,5 6 7 which is the phenomenon
responsible for the strong contractions after the interval that follows
a short interval16 (it has previously been
demonstrated that such postextrasystolic
potentiation contributes to pulse variation during atrial
fibrillation6), and (2) the decay of
postextrasystolic potentiation, which has a time
course of several beats.17
The present study explores the hypothesis that the
beat-by-beat hemodynamic changes of atrial fibrillation
are associated with beat-by-beat changes in
contractility. We recorded beat-by-beat changes in
left ventricular pressure-volume loops in atrial
fibrillation patients during cardiac catheterization
and then constructed end-systolic pressure-volume
relationships.
Protocol
Equipment
Pressure and volume signals were optimized, calibrated, recorded,
and displayed continuously as functions of each other to give
pressure-volume cycles. After the correct phase relations of all
segmental volumes were ensured, data were collected and total volume
was derived from the sum of segmental volumes. The
micromanometer was zeroed to atmospheric pressure
at midchest level and calibrated against a standard signal from an
amplifier.
Conductance-derived ventricular volume was related to true
left ventricular volume measured in 2 different ways: (1)
in the atrial fibrillation patients by cineangiography (with measured
magnification factors permitting calculation of left
ventricular volume by the method of Dodge et
al20) and (2) in the control patients by
comparing conductance stroke volumes with thermodilution-derived stroke
volumes. Although the use of 2 different methods for estimating
absolute ventricular volume may create a systematic error
between the 2 patient groups, this study is concerned primarily with
beat-to-beat variations in volume within individual patients, thus
making this potential error irrelevant.
Data Acquisition and Analysis
End systole was defined as the time at which the ratio of pressure to
volume was maximal; pressure and volume at this time were added, for
each beat, into a Microsoft Excel file as end-systolic pressure
and volume. Other variables determined and entered into the Excel
file were heart rate, end-diastolic volume, stroke volume,
and maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV
dP/dtmax).
The relationships between end-systolic pressure and volume were
determined by linear regression and by Spearman rank correlation by use
of InStat (Graph Pad Inc). The latter was done in anticipation
that some data sets might be nonlinear. Linear regression and Spearman
rank correlation were also carried out between (dependent variable
first) (1) end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval, (2)
end-systolic volume and prepreceding R-R interval, (3) LV
dP/dtmax and preceding R-R interval, and (4) LV
dP/dtmax and prepreceding R-R interval.
Control Studies
Typical data sets for a control patient and an atrial fibrillation
patient are shown in Figure 2A
We reasoned that arterial pressure with its baroreceptor
control was achieving a measure of end-systolic pressure clamp
and that the contractility changes were manifest
primarily as end-systolic volume variation. We therefore used
end-systolic volume as a negative index of
contractility for beat-to-beat analysis.
The variation in end-systolic volume showed statistically
significant negative relations with the preceding interval (Figure 3
The variation in end-systolic volume also showed statistically
significant positive relations with prepreceding interval (Figure 4
The presence of positive relationships between LV
dP/dtmax and preceding R-R interval were shown by
significant positive correlations (Figure 5
It was not our intention to use the data from the control patients for
comparison but rather simply to show that the same research team
performing the atrial fibrillation study, with the same
apparatus, could reproduce the type of results frequently
confirmed in the literature (Figure 1A
The conclusion that contractility is not constant from
beat to beat might be expected, in view of earlier findings that
postextrasystolic potentiation occurs during atrial
fibrillation.6 However, we have also shown that
as the preceding interval gets longer, the left ventricle empties more
(Figure 3
If this argument is accepted, we can confirm that the result (Figure 3
An even greater difficulty encountered in a previous
study27 involved the attempt to claim that stroke
volume is also influenced by mechanical restitution. Together with
previous studies,6 7 28 these authors claimed
that the amplitude of hemodynamic variables in
atrial fibrillation is modified by the cumulative influences of
interval-force relationships, comprising mechanical restitution and
postextrasystolic potentiation and its decay.
However, end-diastolic volume clearly increases with
increasing preceding interval, and in our data set, there was always a
significant positive correlation between stroke volume and
end-diastolic volume, confirming the contribution of the
Frank-Starling mechanism to the stroke volume/preceding interval
relationship shown previously.27 Our finding of a
decrease in end-systolic volume with increasing preceding
interval (Figure 3
The findings of this study are entirely consistent with
earlier animal models of atrial fibrillation in which the effects of
interval and volume could be more easily separated, and preceding as
well as prepreceding interval was shown to be an important determinant
of varying contractile function.29 30 31 Edmands
and colleagues32 induced experimental atrial
fibrillation in dogs and related the rate of change of tension (from
strain gauges stitched into the left ventricular free wall)
to pulse pressure. They found that the inotropic variation correlated
better with pulse pressure than did either end-diastolic
pressure or filling time. More recently, using a computerized nuclear
probe to assess relative change in ventricular volume
during atrial fibrillation, Gosselink et al7
concluded that "the interval force relation explains the varying left
ventricular performance during atrial fibrillation
over the entire range of R-R intervals," and that "the contribution
of the Frank Starling mechanism to varying left ventricular
performance during atrial fibrillation remains a matter of
doubt and debate." In view of the positive relationship between
stroke volume and end-diastolic volume in our patients with
atrial fibrillation, we would rather conclude that both mechanisms
contribute to the beat-to-beat variations in stroke volume.
Received March 3, 1998;
revision received May 27, 1998;
accepted May 31, 1998.
2.
Braunwald E, Frye RL, Aygen MM, Gilbert JW. Studies on
Starling's law of the heart, III: observations in patients with mitral
stenosis and atrial fibrillation on the relationships between
end diastolic segment length, filling pressure, and
characteristics of ventricular contraction. J
Clin Invest. 1960;39:18741884.
3.
Einthoven W, Korteweg AJ. On the variability of the
size of the pulse in cases of auricular fibrillation. Heart. 1915;6:107120.
4.
Wenckebach L. Die Arrythmie als Ausdruck bestimmter
Funktionsstörungen des Herzens. In: Leipzig, 1903.
5.
Karliner JS, Gault JH, Bouchard R, Holzer J. Factors
influencing the ejection fraction and the mean rate of circumferential
fibre shortening during atrial fibrillation in man. Cardiovasc
Res. 1974;8:1825.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Hardman SMC, Noble MIM, Seed WA.
Postextrasystolic potentiation and its contribution
to the beat-to-beat variation of the pulse during atrial fibrillation.
Circulation. 1992;86:12231232.
7.
Gosselink ATM, Blanksma PK, Crijns HJGM, van Gelder
IC, de Kam PJ, Hillege HL, Niemeijer MG, Lie KI, Meijler FL. Left
ventricular beat-to-beat performance in atrial
fibrillation: contribution of Frank-Starling mechanism after short
rather than long RR intervals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:15161521.[Abstract]
8.
Allen DG, Kurihara S. Calcium transients in mammalian
ventricular muscle. Eur Heart J.
1980;1(suppl A):515.
9.
Wier WG, Yue DT. Intracellular calcium transients
underlying the short-term force-interval relationship in ferret
ventricular myocardium. J
Physiol. 1986;376:507530.
10.
ter Keurs HEDJ, Noble MIM. Starling's Law of the
Heart Revisited. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers; 1988.
11.
Burkhoff D, Yue DT, Franz MR, Hunter WC, Sagawa K.
Mechanical restitution of isolated perfused canine left ventricles.
Am J Physiol. 1984;246:H8H16.
12.
Cooper IC, Fry CH. Mechanical restitution in isolated
mammalian myocardium: species differences and underlying
mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1990;22:439452.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Elzinga G, Lab MJ, Noble MIM, Papadoyannis DE, Pidgeon
J, Seed A, Wohlfart B. The action potential duration and contractile
response of the intact heart related to the preceding interval and the
preceding beat in the dog and cat. J Physiol. 1981;314:481500.
14.
Edman KAP, Johannsson M. The contractile state of
rabbit papillary muscle in relation to stimulation frequency.
J Physiol. 1976;254:565581.
15.
Pidgeon J, Miller GAH, Noble MIM, Papadoyannis D, Seed
WA. The relationship between the strength of the human heart beat and
the interval between beats. Circulation. 1982;65:14041410.
16.
Noble MIM, Seed WA. The Interval-Force
Relationship of the Heart: Bowditch Revisited. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 1992.
17.
ter Keurs HEDJ, Gao WD, Bosker H, Drake-Holland AJ,
Noble MIM. Characterisation of the decay of frequency induced
potentiation and of post extrasystolic potentiation.
Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:903910.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Baan J, Aouw Jong TT, Kerkhof PLM, Moene RJ, Van Dijk
AD, Van der Velde ET, Koop J. Continuous stroke volume and cardiac
output from intra-ventricular dimensions obtained with the
impedance catheter. Cardiovasc Res. 1981;15:328334.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Baan J, Van der Velde ET, Debruin HG, Smeenk GJ, Koops
J, Van Dijk AD, Temmerman D, Senden PJ, Buis B. Continuous measurement
of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by
conductance catheter. Circulation. 1984;70:812833.
20.
Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, Lord DJ. The use of
biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left
ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1960;60:762776.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Weber KT, Janicki JS, Hefner LL. Left
ventricular force-length relations of isovolumic and
ejecting contractions. Am J Physiol. 1976;231:337343.
22.
Sagawa K. The ventricular pressure-volume
diagram revisited. Circ Res. 1978;43:677687.
23.
Sagawa K. The end-systolic pressure-volume
relation of the ventricle: definition, modifications and clinical use.
Circulation. 1981;63:12231227.
24.
Braveny P, Kruta V. Dissociation de deux facteurs:
restitution et potentiation dans l'action de l'intervalle sur
l'amplitude de la contraction du myocarde. Arch Int Physiol
Biochim. 1958;74:169178.
25.
Johannsson M. Mechanical restitution in cardiac muscle.
In: Noble MIM, Seed WA, eds. The Interval-Force Relationship of
the Heart: Bowditch Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press; 1992:227244.
26.
Seed WA, Noble MIM, Walker JM, Miller GAH, Pidgeon J,
Redwood D, Wanless R, Franz MR, Schoettler M. Relationships between
beat to beat interval and the strength of contraction in the healthy
and diseased human heart. Circulation. 1984;70:799805.
27.
Hardman SMC, Noble MIM, Biggs T, Seed WA. Evidence for
an influence of mechanical restitution on beat-to-beat variations in
haemodynamics during spontaneous atrial fibrillation in patients.
Cardiovasc Res. 1998;38:8290.
28.
Hardman SMC, Pfeiffer KP, Kenner T, Noble MIM, Seed WA.
Analysis of left ventricular contractile behaviour
during atrial fibrillation. Basic Res Cardiol. 1994;89:438455.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Meijler FL, Strackee J, van Capelle FJL, du Perron JC.
Computer analysis of the RR
interval-contractility relationship during random
stimulation of the isolated heart. Circ Res. 1968;22:695702.
30.
Meijler F, Bogaard Fvd, Tweel Lvd, Durrer D.
Post-extrasystolic potentiation in the isolated rat heart.
Am J Physiol. 1962;202:631635.
31.
Rogel S, Mahler Y. Myocardial tension in atrial
fibrillation. J Appl Physiol. 1969;27:822825.
32.
Edmands RE, Greenspan K, Fisch C. The role of inotropic
variation in ventricular function during atrial
fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 1970;49:738749.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Myocardial Contractility Is Not Constant During Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation in Patients
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
BackgroundThe variation in
stroke volume and pulse pressure characteristic of atrial fibrillation
is usually ascribed to time-dependent ventricular filling,
implying a single positive relationship between end-systolic
pressure and volume, which defines a single state of myocardial
contractility. We tested the hypothesis that
contractility also varies.
Key Words: arrhythmia cardiac volume hemodynamics intervals ventricles mechanics
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Beat-to-beat changes in the pulse pressure and
stroke volume during atrial fibrillation have largely been attributed
to variations in ventricular
filling1 2 and a modifying influence of aortic
diastolic pressure.3 However, a role
for an inherent inotropic mechanism (an effect on myocardial
contractility) caused by changes in interval between
beats has also been postulated.4 Interest in this
interval-force relationship during atrial fibrillation in huans has
been of increasing recent interest.5 6 7 This is
an interval-dependent variation in the concentration of calcium ions
released to the contractile proteins on
activation.8 9
800 to 1000
ms).11 12 13 14 15 In such preparations, initial muscle
length can be kept constant, but in the intact human, with increasing
interval, end-diastolic volume also increases progressively
and increases force of contraction by means of the Frank-Starling
mechanism.
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Atrial Fibrillation Studies
Six unselected patients with chronic atrial fibrillation without
aortic or mitral valve disease were studied at cardiac
catheterization after diagnostic
angiography (Table 1
). In accordance
with the Helsinki agreement, the study was subject to local ethical
committee approval, and all patients had given signed informed consent.
The only patients specifically excluded from the study were patients
with valve prostheses; those with aortic valve disease, in whom passage
of the study catheter across a diseased valve could have been
hazardous; and those with mitral regurgitation, because
this would have prejudiced the isovolumic contraction period. Apart
from these exclusions, we studied unselected patients entering the
catheter laboratory who had atrial fibrillation with clinical features
summarized in Table 1
.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Patient Details
Patients fasted on the day of the procedure, omitting regular
medication. There was therefore a minimum period of 12 hours since the
last dose of any drug and >24 hours for once-daily drugs. This allowed
half-decay of concentration of those drugs affecting myocardial
contractility, the slowest decay being of once-daily
digoxin. Patients received 10 mg temazepam 1 hour before the study or
no premedication. A 7F conductance catheter was used, with a 2.5F
micromanometer inserted through the central lumen.
The catheter was introduced into the left ventricle from the right
femoral artery under fluoroscopy and was positioned so that the distal
electrode was in the apex of the left ventricle and the proximal
electrode at the aortic valve orifice; this gave
simultaneous recordings of left
ventricular pressure and volume. These signals, together
with the ECG, were recorded during quiet respiration onto a
personal computer over periods of several minutes and were subsequently
analyzed with dedicated software.
The principles of the conductance method to estimate left
ventricular volume have been described in detail
elsewhere.18 19 Briefly, this method is based on
the measurement of the conductivity of blood within the
ventricular cavity. The conductance catheter has a series
of 8 equally spaced electrodes at its distal end, all of which sit
within the left ventricle. This catheter is connected to a signal
processing and conditioning unit (Cardiodynamics), which applies a
20-kHz, 30-µA alternating current between the proximal and distal
electrodes. The remaining 6 electrodes are used to measure a
time-varying ventricular conductance, G(t), as the sum of 5
segments. The relationship between the varying volume, V(t), and the
time-varying conductance, G(t), is given by the simple formula
V(t)=1/
· L2 · r[G(t)-G(p)],
where the V(t) is the volume as a function of time,
is the ratio of
the conductance-derived volume to true ventricular volume,
L is the interelectrode distance, r is the resistivity of blood in
/cm, G(t) is the time-varying conductance, and G(p) is the parallel
conductance due to the conductance of structures outside the
ventricular blood pool. An "offset volume," Vc, is
related to this parallel conductance by Vc=1/
·
L2 · r(Gp) and was estimated by the
hypertonic saline injection technique.
The conductance-derived volume signal was generated and
processed by a Sigma 5DF signal conditioning and processing unit
(Leycom) using a value of blood resistivity determined immediately
before each data acquisition. It was transferred directly into custom
software in a dedicated microcomputer through a 12-bit, 16-channel
analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (DT 282 Data Translation). Segmental
volumes were checked for phase relation to simultaneous
pressure and intracavity ECG signals and centered in the A/D ranges.
Conductance-derived volumes were displayed and recorded and were
later corrected to true volumes by off-line computer, in accordance
with the procedures described in the previous section. The pressure
signal was imported directly into the same software as the volume
signal and displayed and recorded in real time.
To ensure that the previously described unique positive
pressure-volume relationship was obtained in our hands with the above
methods, we subjected to similar analysis pressure-volume data
from patients in sinus rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic operations for
coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Pressure-volume curves
were performed in these surgical patients as part of a separate study
to examine the effects of L-arginine on postoperative left
ventricular performance. The data given are
baseline data from patients before any intervention or
L-arginine administration. We present these data only
to demonstrate that, in our hands, the end-systolic
pressure-volume curve is the same as published by others. Left
ventricular volume changes were achieved by variation in
the venous return by means of vena caval slings. These patients are
described in Table 1
.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Satisfactory pressure-volume loops were recorded in 6 atrial
fibrillation patients and 4 control patients. A typical sequence of
beats, showing the great variability of volume and pressure with R-R
interval change from beat to beat, is shown in Figure 1B
and compared with sinus rhythm in
Figure 1A
.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Representative recordings
of left ventricular pressure-volume loops in (A) a patient
in sinus rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (volume variation
achieved by caval occlusion) and (B) a patient in atrial fibrillation
undergoing cardiac catheterization.
and 2B
.
All results for end-systolic pressure-volume relationships are
summarized in Table 2
. In
the control patients, these 2 variables were extremely tightly and
positively correlated in accordance with previous reports; this
indicates that our standard pressure-volume methodology yields the same
result in sinus rhythm that was previously
established.21 22 23 The correlations between
end-systolic volume and pressure in atrial fibrillation were
either statistically nonsignificant or significantly negative. This
means that during atrial fibrillation, the end-systolic
pressure-volume points are jumping from beat to beat from one positive
pressure-volume relation to another, ie, each beat has a different
contractility. The results in all patients are
consistent with this behavior.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Representative
end-systolic pressure-volume plots in (A) a patient in sinus
rhythm undergoing cardiothoracic surgery and (B) a patient in atrial
fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Statistical
Results
, Table 3
), ie, the longer the
preceding interval, the more the left ventricle emptied. As expected,
there was some scatter that precluded distinction in most cases between
linear and nonlinear relationships (Table 3
); the scatter is due to the
other force-interval effects (see introduction) but did not obscure the
presence of an end-systolic volume/preceding interval
relationship. The data in Figure 3
are fitted by a 2-phase exponential
decay curve fit (Prism, Graph Pad Inc), in line with mechanical
restitution in isolated cardiac muscle
preparations.12 14 24 25

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between
end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval. As preceding
interval gets longer, left ventricle empties more.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Statistical
Results
, Table 3
); ie, the shorter the interval
before the preceding interval, the more the left ventricle emptied. The
effect of scatter due to other force-interval effects was similar to
that for mechanical restitution (Table 3
). The data in Figure 4
are
fitted by a single exponential association curve fit (Prism, Graph Pad
Inc) in accordance with previous data on interval dependence of
postextrasystolic
potentiation.13 26

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between
end-systolic volume and interval before preceding interval. As
prepreceding interval gets shorter, left ventricle empties more.
, Table 4
); this confirms previous
findings, but our data showed more scatter due to the absence of
"gating,"27 a process by which data with
short prepreceding intervals are excluded. The increase in LV
dP/dtmax with preceding interval was associated
with increasing end-diastolic volume; the result therefore
does not confirm the presence of mechanical restitution. The presence
of negative relationships between LV dP/dtmax and
prepreceding interval (Figure 6
, Table 4
)
confirms previous findings.6 In this case, LV
dP/dtmax is not associated with
end-diastolic volume, so that the result does indicate the
presence of postextrasystolic potentiation.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between
maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV
dP/dtmax) and preceding R-R interval.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 4. Statistical
Results

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Figure 6. Relationship, during atrial fibrillation, between
maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (LV
dP/dtmax) and R-R interval before preceding interval.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The results of this study disprove the hypothesis that the
beat-to-beat changes in hemodynamics during atrial
fibrillation are entirely due to changes in left
ventricular filling, because this hypothesis would require
myocardial contractility to be constant, ie,
end-systolic pressure and volume would lie along a single
positive relationship. This is clearly not the case (Figures 1
and 2
;
Table 2
).
). Indeed, these patients could
not be compared with the atrial fibrillation patients, because the
former had normal contractile function and were studied below the
physiological range of volume, resulting in good
tracings (Figure 1A
). By contrast, the atrial fibrillation patients had
variably poor left ventricular function and were studied
over a much larger range of volumes, leading to less stable loops and
evidence of incoordinate contraction during the isovolumic contraction
and relaxation periods (Figure 1B
).
, Table 3
). The main determinant of end-systolic
volume is the end-systolic pressure, ie, a decrease in
end-systolic pressure causes a decrease in end-systolic
volume. In the case of the relationships explored in our atrial
fibrillation patients, however, as the preceding interval gets longer,
the end-systolic pressure remains more or less constant. We
suggest that this is because it is determined by systolic
arterial pressure and that this is determined, in turn, by
baroreceptor and other reflexes that buffer arterial
pressure and keep it more or less constant. We therefore suggest that
the only way in which end-systolic volume could have got
smaller as preceding interval increased is by leftward shifts of the
end-systolic pressure-volume curve, ie, increasing myocardial
contractility.21 22 23
)
indicated the presence of mechanical restitution during beat-to-beat
changes in atrial fibrillation. This could not be definitively shown
previously by use of LV dP/dtmax (Figure 5
),27 if one assumes that that index is sensitive
to the accompanying changes in end-diastolic volume.
, Table 3
) clearly indicates, for the first time,
that contractility change does contribute to the stroke
volume dependence on preceding interval.
![]()
Footnotes
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Royal Brompton and Charing Cross Hospitals, London, UK.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Lewis T. Fibrillation of the auricles: its effects
upon the circulation. J Exp Med. 1912;16:395420.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Europace, September 1, 2006; 8(9): 651 - 745. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 854 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): e149 - e246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): e257 - e354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, J. E. Lowe, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration With the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 700 - 752. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, J.-Y. Le Heuzey, G. N. Kay, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1979 - 2030. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mohri, J. Shimizu, G. Iribe, H. Ito, T. Morita, H. Yamaguchi, S. Sano, F. Kajiya, and H. Suga Normal distribution of ventricular pressure-volume area of arrhythmic beats under atrial fibrillation in canine heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1740 - H1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. B. Popovic', K. A. Mowrey, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, R. A. Grimm, J. D. Thomas, and T. N. Mazgalev Slow rate during AF improves ventricular performance by reducing sensitivity to cycle length irregularity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2706 - H2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Takagaki, P M McCarthy, M Chung, J Connor, R Dessoffy, Y Ochiai, M Howard, K Doi, M Kopcak, T N Mazgalev, et al. Preload-adjusted maximal power: a novel index of left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 170 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1852 - 1923. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fuster, L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, G. N. Kay, W. W. Klein, S. Levy, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1266 - 1266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M I M NOBLE Beat to beat left ventricular performance in spontaneous atrial fibrillation does not depend on afterload Heart, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 89 - 89. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |