(Circulation. 1998;98:2141-2147.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Zentrum Innere Medizin, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universität Göttingen (G.H., B.P., L.M.), and the Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universität Freiburg (M.C., B.K., H.J.), Germany.
Correspondence to Gerd Hasenfuss, MD, Universität Göttingen, Zentrum Innere Medizin, Abteilung Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. E-mail hasenfus{at}med.uni-goettingen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe investigated the influence of levosimendan on isometric contractions and calcium transients (aequorin method) in muscle strips from human hearts with end-stage failing dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=27). Data were compared with the effects of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor milrinone (n=9). The average maximum increase in twitch tension was 47±14% (range, 6% to 150%) at a levosimendan concentration of 0.8±0.3 µmol/L (P<0.01). This was associated with significant increases in maximum rates of tension rise and fall and decreases in times to peak tension, to 50% relaxation, and to 95% relaxation. In aequorin-loaded muscles, levosimendan 10-6 mol/L increased average tension by 50% (P<0.02), associated with a nonsignificant increase in aequorin light (16%). With milrinone 10-5 mol/L, average tension increased by 58% and aequorin light by 49% (P<0.05). In those muscle strips with pronounced inotropic effects (>50% increase in tension), there was a comparable and pronounced increase in aequorin light with both agents. However, in muscle strips with weak inotropic responses (<50% increase in tension), the increase in light was significantly higher with milrinone than with levosimendan.
ConclusionsLevosimendan has inotropic and lusitropic actions in failing human myocardium. Comparison with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor milrinone indicates that in case of pronounced inotropic stimulation, the modes of action of the two agents may be similar (phosphodiesterase inhibition), whereas small inotropic effects of levosimendan may result predominantly from calcium sensitization.
Key Words: levosimendan calcium myocardium heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Levosimendan is a new inotropic agent that was suggested to increase calcium sensitivity by a novel mechanism.11 12 The compound was shown to bind to troponin C, the calcium receptor of myofilaments that triggers activation of contractile proteins. Association of levosimendan with troponin C was suggested to stabilize the calcium-induced change of troponin C conformation, thereby augmenting the effect of calcium binding to troponin C. In addition to this new calcium-sensitizing effect, levosimendan was shown to inhibit phosphodiesterase 3 at high concentrations, which may result in increased intracellular calcium concentration.13 14 Because levosimendan is considered a potential candidate for long-term clinical application in patients with congestive heart failure, knowledge of the effects of levosimendan on failing human myocardium is of great importance. In particular, the influence of the agent on intracellular calcium transients and on relaxation of the myocardium is of clinical relevance.
Accordingly, it was the goal of the present study to investigate the effects of levosimendan on isolated myocardium from end-stage failing human hearts stimulated to contract isometrically under physiological temperature and stimulation rates. The influence on intracellular calcium transients was studied by use of the photoprotein aequorin, and the effects of levosimendan on isometric force and aequorin light emission were compared with those of the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor milrinone.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventricular myocardium was dissected from the endocardial surface of the ventricle immediately after cardiectomy.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Freiburg.
Muscle Strip Preparation
The excised myocardium was immediately submerged in
a protective solution and oxygenated by bubbling with 95%
O2/5%
CO2.15 16 Thin
trabeculae or muscle strips were dissected from the
endocardial surface of the heart. Myocardial preparations were
transferred to the muscle chamber, connected to the force gauge by fine
steel hooks (F30 type 372, Hugo Sachs Elektronik), and submerged in
normal oxygenated Krebs-Ringer solution to wash out the
protective solution (37°C). The solution contained (mmol/L)
Na+ 152, K+ 3.6,
Cl- 135,
HCO3- 25,
Mg2+ 0.6,
H2PO4-
1.3, SO42- 0.6,
Ca2+ 1.25, glucose 11.2, and insulin 10 IU/L. For
the aequorin measurements, trabeculae were mounted in a
cylindrical glass cuvette (OPT1L, Scientific Instruments) and
superfused with normal oxygenated Krebs-Ringer solution.
Isometric twitches were evoked at 1-second intervals with stimulation
voltage 20% above threshold (duration, 5 ms). After an equilibration
period of 30 to 60 minutes, the muscle was stretched gradually (0.05-
to 0.1-mm steps) to the length at which maximum steady-state twitch
force was reached (Lmax). Thereafter,
experimental protocols were performed as described below. At the end of
each experiment, muscle length at Lmax was
measured, and blotted weight of this segment was obtained.
Cross-sectional area for normalization of force values was calculated
as the ratio of blotted weight to muscle length
(Lmax). Average cross-sectional area of the
muscle strips investigated was 0.54±0.03
mm2.
Experimental Protocols
Twitch tension, rates of tension rise and fall, and timing
parameters were measured from the recordings (WR
3310, Graphtec). Levosimendan was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO). Because this agent decreases contractile force, we added DMSO
at 1% to the Krebs-Ringer solution in all levosimendan experiments,
including controls. Thereby, the DMSO concentration increased from 1%
(control) to 1.1% (levosimendan). Milrinone was dissolved in
dimethylformamide (DMF). DMF at 0.5% was added to Krebs-Ringer
solution in all milrinone experiments, including controls. Thereby,
maximum DMF concentration increased from 0.5% (control) to 0.77%
(milrinone).
Protocol 1: Concentration-Dependent Effects of Levosimendan on
Isometric Contractions
During steady-state stimulation (60
min-1, 37°C), isometric contractions were
recorded. Thereafter, levosimendan was applied at concentrations of
3x10-8, 10-7,
3x10-7, 10-6, and
3x10-6 mol/L, and isometric force signals were
recorded under steady-state conditions at each concentration.
Experiments were performed in 10 muscle strip preparations from 7
hearts.
Protocol 2: Influence of Stimulation Frequency on the Effects
of Levosimendan
Steady-state isometric force-frequency relationship was
investigated by recording twitches after stimulation of the
muscle strip preparations for 5 minutes at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150
min-1. Thereafter, levosimendan
10-6 mol/L was applied, and recording of
force-frequency relation was repeated. Experiments were performed in 8
muscle strip preparations from 6 hearts.
Protocol 3: Influence of Levosimendan on Aequorin Light
Emission
The Ca2+-regulated bioluminescent
photoprotein aequorin was macroinjected into the quiescent muscle just
beneath the endocardium.17 Light and force
signals were recorded (37°C, 60 min-1) and
analyzed as described recently18 during
control and after levosimendan was applied at concentrations of
3x10-7 and 10-6 mol/L.
Fifty light transients were averaged at each experimental step to
increase the signal-to-noise ratio. Aequorin light emission was
analyzed as the amplitude of the aequorin light signal between
the peak systolic light emission and the diastolic
baseline values (millivolts of amplifier output). Time from peak light
to 50% decline of the light signal was taken from the
recordings, and the time constant
was determined by fitting
the decline phase of the aequorin light signal to a
monoexponential curve. Experiments were performed in 9
muscle strip preparations from 9 hearts.
Protocol 4: Influence of Milrinone on Aequorin Light
Emission
Isometric force and aequorin light were also recorded
(37°C, 60 min-1) during control and after
application of milrinone at 10-7,
10-6, 10-5,
10-4, and 3x10-4 mol/L.
Aequorin light signals recorded at 10-5 and
10-4 mol/L were analyzed because at
these concentrations, the increase in twitch tension was comparable to
the effects observed with levosimendan. Experiments were performed in 9
muscle strip preparations from 9 hearts, different from those studied
with levosimendan.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Differences between control and
measurements taken after interventions were compared by paired or
unpaired t test if appropriate. If multiple values within 1
group were compared, a t test followed by Bonferroni-Holm
transformation was applied.19 A value of
P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Influence of Stimulation Frequency on the Effects of
Levosimendan
Because calcium sensitizers may impair relaxation most
pronouncedly at higher heart rates, the influence of levosimendan on
isometric contractions was also investigated at higher stimulation
frequencies. Without levosimendan, isometric tension tended to decrease
with higher stimulation rates (blunted or inverse force-frequency
relation in failing human myocardium). Levosimendan
(10-6 mol/L) increased twitch tension by 42%,
35%, and 23% (P<0.05) at 30, 60, and 90
min-1, respectively (Figure 2
). There was no frequency-dependent rise
in diastolic tension with levosimendan. Time to 50%
relaxation was significantly reduced with levosimendan at stimulation
frequencies of 60, 90, and 150 min-1 (Figure 2
).
|
Influence of Levosimendan on Intracellular Calcium
Transients
Figure 3
shows typical original
registrations of the effect of levosimendan on isometric force and
aequorin light emission. In the muscle strip shown in the top of Figure 3
, the inotropic effect of levosimendan occurred without an increase in
peak aequorin light emission. The bottom of Figure 3
shows another
muscle strip preparation in which an increase in force by 92% was
associated with an increase in light by 47%. Times to 50% and 95%
relaxation decreased with levosimendan. The decreases in relaxation
times were present in all muscles strips with pronounced and small
inotropic effects (Table 2
).
|
|
Comparison of Levosimendan With Milrinone
Figure 4
shows typical original
registrations of the effect of milrinone on isometric force and
aequorin light emission. The inotropic effect of milrinone was
associated with an increase in the aequorin light emission. At
concentrations of 10-5 and
10-4 mol/L, milrinone (n=9) increased twitch
tension by 58% (P<0.01) and 94% (P<0.005) and
aequorin light emission by 49% (P<0.05) and 70%
(P<0.01), respectively (Figure 5
). In comparison, levosimendan in a
different group of muscles (n=9) increased twitch tension by 49%
(P<0.02) and aequorin light emission by 15%
(P=NS) at a concentration of 3x10-7
mol/L and increased twitch tension by 50% (P<0.02) and
aequorin light emission by 16% (P=NS) at a concentration of
10-6 mol/L (Figure 5
). The duration of the
aequorin light signal and the diastolic level were not
significantly altered with milrinone or levosimendan. Time to 50%
decline of the aequorin light signal was 111±16 ms during control and
108±15 ms with milrinone 10-4 mol/L
(P=NS); it was 107±15 ms before and 100±17 ms with
levosimendan 10-6 mol/L (P=NS). The
time constant,
, of the decline phase of the aequorin light signal
did not change significantly with levosimendan (102±13 ms at
10-6 mol/L versus 100±10 ms during control),
whereas it decreased significantly, from 120±22 to 82±14 ms, with
10-4 mol/L milrinone (P<0.003).
|
|
Because the effects of levosimendan varied considerably, the effects of
levosimendan and the effects of milrinone were also compared at similar
inotropic responses of the different muscle strips. Therefore, muscle
strips were arbitrarily divided into 2 groups, those with an increase
in tension by <50% with either levosimendan or milrinone (group 1
muscles) and by >50% with either levosimendan or milrinone (group 2
muscles). In group 2 muscles, tension increased by 124±15% (by
7.1±2.1 mN/mm2) with levosimendan (n=3) and by
122±17% (by 6.7±1.8 mN/mm2) with milrinone
(n=5). The increase in light with levosimendan was statistically not
different from that observed with milrinone (Figure 6
). In group 1 muscles, tension increased
by 23±7% (1.6±0.5 mN/mm2) with levosimendan
(n=6) and by 16±6% (1.0±0.2 mN/mm2) with
milrinone (n=4). The increase in light with milrinone was significantly
higher than the change in light observed with levosimendan (Figure 6
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Concentration-response experiments indicate that the inotropic effect
of levosimendan in human myocardium can be observed at
concentrations of
3x10-8 mol/L. There was a
considerable variation between the different preparations with regard
to the concentration at which the maximum inotropic effect was reached
and the quantity of this effect (Figure 1
). This was not due to
different causes of the underlying cardiac diseases (ischemic
or dilated cardiomyopathy). Furthermore, the
inotropic effect in cumulative concentration-response experiments
tended to be less pronounced than that observed in the aequorin
experiments, in which only 2 different concentrations were used. These
observations may be related to the finding that the affinity of
levosimendan to troponin C decreases with increasing
phosphorylation of troponin I.20
The degree of phosphorylation of troponin I may be
different in the various preparations and may be increased during
cumulative concentration-response experiments by a
phosphodiesterase-inhibiting effect of levosimendan itself. Likewise,
the observation that the inotropic effect of levosimendan was
diminished at higher heart rates (see Figure 2
) may be related to
rate-dependent phosphorylation processes.
Interestingly, the positive lusitropic effect of levosimendan was still present at higher rates of stimulation. A positive lusitropic effect has not been observed in previous studies on various calcium-sensitizing agents, in which relaxation time was either unchanged or prolonged.13 21 22 The positive lusitropic effects of levosimendan may suggest that phosphodiesterase inhibition is the dominant mode of action of levosimendan. Phosphodiesterase inhibition by an increase of cAMP and activation of protein kinase A results in phosphorylation of phospholamban, which increases sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium uptake rate, and phosphorylation of troponin I, which decreases calcium affinity of troponin C.23 Both mechanisms favor relaxation. In addition, protein kinase A, by phosphorylation of L-type calcium channels and potentially sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release channels, increases calcium release substantially.23 24 Inotropic effects mediated through increased cAMP are therefore associated with a pronounced increase in calcium turnover.24
Measurements of intracellular calcium with the photoprotein aequorin
showed that calcium transients are not significantly increased with
levosimendan when average values are considered (Figure 5
). In
contrast, the similar average inotropic effect of milrinone was
associated with a significant increase in aequorin light emission. This
comparison would suggest that calcium sensitization and not
phosphodiesterase inhibition is the dominant mode of action of
levosimendan. To compare the effects of both agents on intracellular
calcium transients at more comparable levels of inotropic responses of
the individual preparations, the muscle strips were divided into 2
groups: those muscles exhibiting a small inotropic effect (<50%
increase in tension) and those exhibiting a pronounced inotropic effect
(>50% increase in tension). In the latter group, the increase in
aequorin light was similar and pronounced with both agents. However, in
the group of muscles exhibiting small inotropic responses, the increase
in calcium was significantly higher with milrinone than with
levosimendan, indicating that the modes of action of the two agents are
similar at pronounced inotropic effects but different at small
inotropic effects. This is in accordance with previous findings of Edes
et al14 and Haikala et al25
and strongly suggests that moderate inotropic effects of levosimendan
result predominantly from calcium sensitization, whereas
phosphodiesterase inhibition may become the dominant mode of action in
more pronounced inotropic effects. One may speculate that the quantity
of the inotropic response to both agents depends on the function of the
cAMP system. In myocardium with impairment of the cAMP
system, milrinone may be more effective as a phosphodiesterase
inhibitor, whereas levosimendan, which has a weaker
phosphodiesterase inhibitory action, elicits the inotropic
effect predominantly through myofibrillar calcium sensitization.
With regard to the positive lusitropic action of levosimendan, it is
interesting that a decrease in relaxation time was also observed in
muscle strips showing only a moderate inotropic response and no rise in
aequorin light emission after application of levosimendan (Table 2
).
This may indicate that smaller degrees of phosphodiesterase inhibition
may improve relaxation without significantly influencing calcium
transients. In addition, it is tempting to speculate that the novel
mechanism of calcium sensitization postulated for levosimendan may be
favorable for relaxation. It has been shown that binding of
levosimendan to troponin C is calcium
dependent.12 23 Therefore, binding of
levosimendan to troponin C may be more pronounced during high
systolic compared with low diastolic calcium
concentrations.23 Accordingly, calcium
sensitivity may be increased predominantly during high systolic
calcium concentrations.
In summary, the present study in isolated failing human myocardium indicates that moderate inotropic effects of levosimendan occur without increased intracellular calcium transients and therefore result predominantly from myofilament calcium sensitization. Pronounced inotropic effects are associated with increased calcium transients, suggesting that phosphodiesterase inhibition becomes more relevant. Positive lusitropic effects are present independent of the degree of the inotropic effect. Thus, levosimendan in the lower dose range may be a promising agent for treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Of note, several other inotropic agents that showed favorable effects in experimental studies and short-term clinical trials resulted in increased mortality of patients during long-term treatment.4 5 6 Therefore, whether or not levosimendan may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with heart failure can only be answered by long-term clinical trials.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 13, 1998; revision received July 7, 1998; accepted July 21, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. B. Overgaard and V. Dzavik Inotropes and Vasopressors: Review of Physiology and Clinical Use in Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, September 2, 2008; 118(10): 1047 - 1056. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Masutani, H.-J. Cheng, M. Hyttila-Hopponen, J. Levijoki, A. Heikkila, A. Vuorela, W. C. Little, and C.-P. Cheng Orally Available Levosimendan Dose-Related Positive Inotropic and Lusitropic Effect in Conscious Chronically Instrumented Normal and Heart Failure Dogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 236 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jorgensen, O. Bech-Hanssen, E. Houltz, and S.-E. Ricksten Effects of Levosimendan on Left Ventricular Relaxation and Early Filling at Maintained Preload and Afterload Conditions After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis Circulation, February 26, 2008; 117(8): 1075 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Banfor, L. C. Preusser, T. J. Campbell, K. C. Marsh, J. S. Polakowski, G. A. Reinhart, B. F. Cox, and R. M. Fryer Comparative effects of levosimendan, OR-1896, OR-1855, dobutamine, and milrinone on vascular resistance, indexes of cardiac function, and O2 consumption in dogs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H238 - H248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tasouli, K. Papadopoulos, T. Antoniou, I. Kriaras, G. Stavridis, D. Degiannis, and S. Geroulanos Efficacy and safety of perioperative infusion of levosimendan in patients with compromised cardiac function undergoing open-heart surgery: importance of early use Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 629 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Givertz, C. Andreou, C. H. Conrad, and W. S. Colucci Direct Myocardial Effects of Levosimendan in Humans With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Alteration of Force-Frequency and Relaxation-Frequency Relationships Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1218 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J T Parissis, S Adamopoulos, D Farmakis, G Filippatos, I Paraskevaidis, F Panou, E Iliodromitis, and D Th Kremastinos Effects of serial levosimendan infusions on left ventricular performance and plasma biomarkers of myocardial injury and neurohormonal and immune activation in patients with advanced heart failure Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1768 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De Luca, W. S. Colucci, M. S. Nieminen, B. M. Massie, and M. Gheorghiade Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1908 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tokuda, P. W. Grant, H. D. Wolfenden, C. Manganas, W. J. Lyon, and J. S.K. Murala Levosimendan for patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing cardiac surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kass and R. J. Solaro Mechanisms and Use of Calcium-Sensitizing Agents in the Failing Heart Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): 305 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L Earl and J. T Fitzpatrick Levosimendan: A Novel Inotropic Agent for Treatment of Acute, Decompensated Heart Failure Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2005; 39(11): 1888 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dernellis and M. Panaretou Effects of Levosimendan on Restrictive Left Ventricular Filling in Severe Heart Failure: A Combined Hemodynamic and Doppler Echocardiographic Study Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2633 - 2639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Dominguez-Rodriguez, and J. J. Ferrer-Hita Utility of Levosimendan, a New Calcium Sensitizing Agent, in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Myocardial Stunning in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Series of Cases J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 45(6): 704 - 708. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. von Lewinski, S. Bruns, S. Walther, H. Kogler, and B. Pieske Insulin Causes [Ca2+]i-Dependent and [Ca2+]i-Independent Positive Inotropic Effects in Failing Human Myocardium Circulation, May 24, 2005; 111(20): 2588 - 2595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tachibana, H.-J. Cheng, T. Ukai, A. Igawa, Z.-S. Zhang, W. C. Little, and C.-P. Cheng Levosimendan improves LV systolic and diastolic performance at rest and during exercise after heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H914 - H922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Hamlin, P. S. Villars, J. T. Kanusky, and A. D. Shaw Role of Diastole in Left Ventricular Function, II: Diagnosis and Treatment Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2004; 13(6): 453 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Dorn II and J. D. Molkentin Manipulating Cardiac Contractility in Heart Failure: Data From Mice and Men Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 150 - 158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Stevenson Clinical Use of Inotropic Therapy for Heart Failure: Looking Backward or Forward?: Part II: Chronic Inotropic Therapy Circulation, July 29, 2003; 108(4): 492 - 497. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Vroom Epidemiology and Pharmacotherapy of Acute Heart Failure Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2003; 7(1): 3 - 12. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Brixius, S. Reicke, and R. H. G. Schwinger Beneficial effects of the Ca2+ sensitizer levosimendan in human myocardium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): H131 - H137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E du Toit, D Hofmann, J McCarthy, and C Pineda Effect of levosimendan on myocardial contractility, coronary and peripheral blood flow, and arrhythmias during coronary artery ligation and reperfusion in the in vivo pig model Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 81 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Nieminen, J. Akkila, G. Hasenfuss, F. X. Kleber, L. A. Lehtonen, V. Mitrovic, O. Nyquist, W. J. Remme, and on behalf of the Study Group Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1903 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Slawsky, W. S. Colucci, S. S. Gottlieb, B. H. Greenberg, E. Haeusslein, J. Hare, S. Hutchins, C. V. Leier, T. H. LeJemtel, E. Loh, et al. Acute Hemodynamic and Clinical Effects of Levosimendan in Patients With Severe Heart Failure Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2222 - 2227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sorsa, S. Heikkinen, M. B. Abbott, E. Abusamhadneh, T. Laakso, C. Tilgmann, R. Serimaa, A. Annila, P. R. Rosevear, T. Drakenberg, et al. Binding of Levosimendan, a Calcium Sensitizer, to Cardiac Troponin C J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2001; 276(12): 9337 - 9343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||