(Circulation. 1998;98:2629-2635.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular Drugs |
From Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Correspondence to James E. Tcheng, MD, Box 3275, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail tchen001{at}mc.duke.edu
Key Words: glycoproteins platelet aggregation inhibitors coronary disease trials {texf}The importance of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes is now unequivocally established.1 2 These syndromes (unstable angina, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], acute [ST-elevation] MI, and abrupt closure after coronary intervention) share a common pathophysiology of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, activation of the coagulation cascade, and adhesion, activation, and aggregation of platelets. Numerous investigators have shown that the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) integrin mediates the "final common pathway" in platelet aggregation, spawning the development of GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists.3 4 5 This article reviews the current status of GP IIb/IIIa blockade in the management of coronary artery disease, examining the results of pivotal clinical trials and reviewing current challenges and directions for future investigation.
Platelets and GP IIb/IIIa
In atherosclerotic disease, plaque rupture exposes the
subendothelium and initiates hemostasis. Platelets
adhere to the subendothelium principally via class I
glycoproteins, an effect greatly enhanced by von
Willebrand factor under conditions of flow and high shear
rates.6 7 Platelet activation follows
adhesion and can be initiated by numerous agonists (Figure 1
). With activation, the platelet
degranulates, releasing serotonin, ADP, and other
vasoactive substances into the local environment to further recruit and
stimulate platelets. GP IIb/IIIa undergoes a conformational change
that results in a ligand-receptive state that permits fibrinogen
binding. Cross-linking of fibrinogen bound to activated
platelets culminates in aggregation and thrombus formation.
Regardless of the stimulus for platelet activation, the final
common pathway to coronary thrombosis is mediated by the GP
IIb/IIIa receptor.
|
The GP IIb/IIIa receptor belongs to the integrin family of cell
membrane glycoproteins. Integrins have been isolated from
cells throughout the body and are mediators of cell-cell and
cell-substrate adhesion and signaling.8 The GP
IIb/IIIa integrin consists of 2 noncovalently linked
(
IIb) and ß (ß3)
subunits (Figure 2
). The importance of
this integrin in platelet aggregation was first noticed in patients
with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia, an inherited disorder
characterized by recurrent mucocutaneous bleeding due to either absent
or dysfunctional GP IIb/IIIa.10 11 There
are 2 binding sites on GP IIb/IIIa, one that recognizes the amino acid
sequence Arg-Gly-Asp (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid, or RGD) and
another that recognizes Lys-Gln-Ala-Gly-Asp-Val.5
Fibrinogen is the principal ligand for this receptor; other
RGD-containing ligands include fibronectin, vitronectin,
and von Willebrand factor. On each circulating platelet,
there are 50 000 to 80 000 GP IIb/IIIa complexes; most are
distributed on the platelet surface, with a smaller pool held in an
internal reserve.4
|
GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists
The first GP IIb/IIIa antagonist developed for clinical investigation was the murine monoclonal antibody m7E3. Coller and associates12 demonstrated that m7E3 prevented platelet aggregation by inhibiting fibrinogen binding. The pharmaceutical abciximab (ReoPro, Centocor and Eli Lilly and Co), a Fab chimera that retains the mouse-derived variable portion of m7E3 joined to the constant region of human IgG Fab, has undergone extensive clinical evaluation and is approved by regulatory agencies worldwide as an adjunct to coronary intervention.13 14 15
Many additional compounds targeting GP IIb/IIIa have been described
(Table 1
). One line of development has
focused on the disintegrins, a class of RGD proteins found in snake
venoms. Disintegrins interfere with the binding of RGD-containing
adhesive proteins to cellular integrins. In particular, the peptide
barbourin, containing a KGD (Lys-Gly-Asp) sequence rather than RGD, has
unique specificity for GP IIb/IIIa compared with RGD-based
peptides.11 Although the naturally occurring
disintegrins proved too immunogenic for human use, their structure
provided a template to develop synthetic peptide
antagonists.6 A prototypic example is
the KGD cyclic heptapeptide eptifibatide (Integrilin, COR
Therapeutics).
|
Another approach has been to mimic the charge and spatial conformation of the RGD sequence via engineered synthetic and semisynthetic compounds. Examples of parenteral peptidomimetic inhibitors include tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck Research Laboratories) and lamifiban (Ro 44-9883, F Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ltd). Orally active GP IIb/IIIa peptidomimetic antagonists are also under investigation.16 17 18
GP IIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit platelet function by
occupying the fibrinogen binding site. Most are administered either
orally or intravenously but not both. The "biological"
half-life can vary widely. Whereas competitive parenteral agents have a
half-life of 2 to 3 hours, abciximab has a half-life of 6 to 12 hours,
with low levels of receptor occupancy (13%) detected even 2 weeks
after treatment.6 19 The half-lives of oral
agents depend on both metabolism and clearance. Most
inhibitors are quite specific for the RGD pocket in GP
IIb/IIIa; abciximab also binds to the
ß3-subunit on vitronectin receptors
(
vß3).1
Agents also differ in binding and dissociation constants, with the
pharmacodynamics of abciximab being suggestive of noncompetitive
kinetics, whereas the effects of others seem concentration dependent.
Finally, oral agents typically require conversion from prodrug to
active metabolite to be functional.
Clinical Trials Overview
More than 30 000 patients have participated in clinical trials
involving GP IIb/IIIa antagonists (Table 2
); these trials include considerable
experience in acute coronary
syndromes.13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Most of these trials used
a 30-day combined incidence of major adverse cardiac events as the
primary end point. The next sections highlight principal findings from
these trials, focusing on remaining questions and issues.
|
Coronary Intervention
Several reasons dictated that percutaneous
revascularization would be the first arena of
investigation. The procedure induces obligatory vessel injury, and it
seemed logical to evaluate the GP IIb/IIIa hypothesis in this setting.
Because roughly 1 million procedures are performed worldwide annually,
a large patient population was accessible. Perhaps most important,
because plaque rupture induced by coronary intervention is
easily timed, the opportunity existed to initiate treatment before
vessel injury and potentially prevent subsequent events.
Five large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of GP IIb/IIIa
antagonists define our current knowledge regarding the
adjunctive use of these agents during coronary intervention.
These include EPIC (Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of
Ischemic Complications), EPILOG (Evaluation in PTCA to Improve
Long-term Outcome with abciximab GP IIb/IIIa blockade), CAPTURE
(Chimeric 7E3 AntiPlateleT in Unstable angina REfractory to standard
treatment), IMPACT II (Integrin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation
and Coronary Thrombosis II) (eptifibatide), and RESTORE
(Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and
REstenosis.13 14 15 20 21 In each trial,
the study drug was initiated before coronary intervention.
Table 3
presents the primary
end-point results for each trial at 30 days and the results with regard
to death or MI and MI alone. Expressed as relative risk reductions, the
30-day treatment effects of active study drug versus placebo were 35%
in EPIC, 56% in EPILOG, 29% in CAPTURE, 22% in IMPACT II, and 24%
in RESTORE.
|
What has been learned from the trials of coronary intervention? First, in the short term, GP IIb/IIIa inhibition reduces abrupt vessel closure and coronary thrombosis. Long term, significant reductions in morbidity and mortality are also realized.28 Second, all patients benefit from treatment. Whereas EPIC, CAPTURE, and RESTORE studied a high-risk population, both EPILOG and IMPACT II used minimally restrictive entry criteria. Subsequent subgroup analyses of EPIC and EPILOG have failed to identify risk groups that did not benefit from treatment.29
Third, the combination of a parenteral GP IIb/IIIa antagonist with standard doses of heparin (achieving a procedural activated clotting time >300 seconds) results in excessive bleeding. Fortunately, the EPILOG trial demonstrated that bleeding can be attenuated to levels comparable to controls by reducing procedural heparin dosing and removing vascular access sheaths within hours after the procedure. This observation emphasizes the need for judicious use of these agents.
The fourth issue remains a vexing problem: identifying the optimal dosing regimen. The relationships and correlation among dosing, receptor occupancy, inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, duration of treatment, and clinical efficacy remain nebulous.30 31 This is compounded by a lack of point-of-care testing for platelet inhibition. Given the efficacy of abciximab with a 12-hour infusion, would a 24-hour infusion provide additional advantage? Given the shorter half-lives of eptifibatide and tirofiban, should these agents be infused longer? Even if optimal duration was known, what is the optimal dose, and can excessive inhibition occur? A case in point is eptifibatide. In attempting to understand its reduced efficacy in IMPACT II (relative to abciximab in EPIC and EPILOG), investigators have postulated that eptifibatide was underdosed, leading to only 30% to 50% receptor occupancy.32 This situation arose because the sensitivity of ex vivo platelet function assays to the concentration of free calcium in the sample aliquot was not understood. Recent pharmacodynamic studies with eptifibatide that used blood anticoagulated in D-Phe-Pro-Arg chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) instead of citrate, a calcium chelator, have verified the biochemical observation.32 Whether higher doses of eptifibatide during coronary intervention will result in clinical efficacy remains to be seen.
The fifth issue concerns the potential for immunogenicity. Although anaphylaxis, allergic manifestations, and granulocytopenia appear to be extremely rare, thrombocytopenia has been observed frequently enough to warrant mention. In clinical trials, thrombocytopenia has been observed at a low rate (ranging from 1.1% to 5.6%) with all parenteral GP IIb/IIIa antagonists; unfortunately, differentiation from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has proven difficult, albeit understudied.13 14 15 20 21 Furthermore, a distinct group of patients with abciximab-related acute profound thrombocytopenia has been described.33 34 35 The clinical syndrome is a precipitous drop in platelet count to <20x109/L within 24 hours of receiving the drug. In EPIC and CAPTURE, acute profound thrombocytopenia developed in 2 (0.3%) of 708 and 2 (0.3%) of 622 patients; in a consecutive series from Duke University, the incidence was 10 (0.79%) of 1446 patients.14 35 Thrombocytopenia responded to platelet transfusion and discontinuation of all antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Complete resolution occurred within 5 to 7 days, and no major clinical sequelae were reported.34 To monitor for thrombocytopenia, a platelet count should be performed 2 to 4 hours after initiation of abciximab therapy and at 24 hours.34
The mechanism for GP IIb/IIIa antagonistrelated
thrombocytopenia is unclear. Possible explanations include preformed
antibodies that bind either GP IIb/IIIa receptor epitopes or
ligand-induced binding sites or the induction of antibodies directed
against the antagonist or the
antagonist-receptor complex.34 36
After administration of abciximab,
6% of patients develop human
anti-chimeric antibodies (HACA); their role in the development of
thrombocytopenia and implications for abciximab readministration are
under study.15
Although the effects of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in reducing
the composite incidence of death, MI, and urgent
revascularization are known, another debate
surrounds the potential for influencing restenosis. In EPIC,
abciximab therapy was associated with a 26% reduction in 6-month
target-vessel
revascularization.37 It was
speculated that this effect was mediated via vitronectin
receptor blockade
(
vß3) on
endothelial and smooth muscle cells, thus reducing
intimal hyperplasia at the site of injury. However, these results have
not been duplicated with other trials of abciximab or with competitive
agents.14 15 20 21 In particular, Ellis and
coworkers26 performed baseline and 6-month
intracoronary ultrasound studies in 225 patients randomized to
treatment with either placebo or a 12- or 24-hour infusion of abciximab
after stenting. No differences in 6-month luminal dimensions were
observed among the 3 groups.27
Finally, regarding the concurrent use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition and stenting, the EPISTENT trial has provided insight. In this prospective study, 2384 patients were randomized to balloon angioplasty with abciximab, stent implantation alone, or stent implantation with abciximab. Stent patients additionally received ticlopidine therapy. At 30 days, patients who received both stenting and abciximab experienced the greatest reduction in the primary composite end point of death, MI, or urgent revascularization (5.3% in the stent-plus-abciximab group versus 10.8% in the stent-only group [P<0.001] versus 6.9% in the balloon-plus-abciximab group).38 Although adjunctive use of abciximab during coronary stenting was clinically efficacious, the economic implications of this strategy deserve further attention.
Acute Coronary Syndromes: Unstable Angina/NonQ-Wave
MI
A second line of investigation has been the adjunctive use of GP
IIb/IIIa blockade in patients who present with unstable
angina/nonQ-wave MI (NQWMI). In this setting, GP IIb/IIIa blockade
may promote stabilization of the ruptured plaque and passivation of the
endothelium into an inert surface incapable of
supporting further platelet activity. This might prevent subsequent
cardiovascular events, particularly during the
treatment period.
Four large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (PRISM, PRISM-PLUS,
PARAGON, and PURSUIT) evaluated parenteral GP IIb/IIIa antagonism in
this syndrome.22 23 24 Table 4
summarizes the data for the primary end
point and the composite end point of death or MI at 30 days for each
trial.
|
The PRISM study of tirofiban examined the effect of short-term medical stabilization, randomizing 3231 patients to a 48-hour infusion of heparin or tirofiban.22 At 48 hours, the primary composite end point of death, MI, or refractory ischemia was reduced by tirofiban (3.8% versus 5.9%; P=0.014). At 30 days, however, the benefit was lost (12.8% versus 13.9%; P=NS). The PRISM-PLUS trial evaluated adjunctive tirofiban as part of an "early invasive" strategy.22 Originally, the study was designed with 3 arms: tirofiban, heparin, or tirofiban with heparin. The tirofiban monotherapy arm was terminated prematurely owing to excess mortality at 7 days (4.6% versus 1.1% with heparin; P=0.012). The 7-day primary composite end point of death, MI, or refractory ischemia favored treatment with the remaining tirofiban approach (12.9% for tirofiban plus heparin versus 17.9% for heparin alone; P=0.004).
The PARAGON-A study was a dose-ranging precursor to a larger trial (PARAGON-B) that evaluated lamifiban in unstable angina/NQWMI. PARAGON-A compared 5 strategies by use of factorial design: 2 doses of lamifiban, each with or without heparin, and heparin alone.23 At 30 days, the primary end point of death or nonfatal MI was similar among treatment groups; no benefit was conferred by lamifiban. When coupled with heparin, high-dose lamifiban increased hemorrhagic events without an efficacy advantage. Interestingly, for the 6-month composite end point, benefit emerged for patients assigned to low-dose lamifiban plus heparin (12.6% versus 17.9% for placebo plus heparin; P=0.025).
The largest study in unstable angina/NQWMI was the PURSUIT trial, in which 10 948 patients were randomized to receive eptifibatide or placebo (in addition to standard therapy) for 72 to 96 hours.24 Eptifibatide treatment significantly reduced the combined incidence of death or MI at 30 days compared with placebo (14.2% versus 15.7%; P=0.04). Among 4 enrolling regions worldwide, the greatest treatment effect (and greatest use of percutaneous intervention) was observed among the 4358 North American patients (11.7% versus 15.0%; P=0.003). As with other competitive GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, there were no significant increases in rates of major bleeding, stroke, or thrombocytopenia.
What has been learned regarding adjunctive use of GP IIb/IIIa
inhibition for unstable angina/NQWMI? Perhaps most important, GP
IIb/IIIa antagonism has been confirmed as the first new strategy since
aspirin and heparin to improve clinical outcomes in this syndrome. At
centers that favor an early invasive strategy, GP IIb/IIIa
antagonists during short-term hospitalization may induce a
paradigm shift in favor of early conservative management, thus reducing
or obviating the need for percutaneous treatment.
Overall, the unstable angina/NQWMI trials suggest a modest but tangible
reduction (
15%) in death and MI at 30 days. Furthermore, benefit is
conferred whether or not percutaneous
revascularization is performed after initiation of
treatment. Whether this modest benefit is sufficient to drive
widespread adoption remains to be seen; use may be tempered by the cost
of therapy.
Several other issues deserve comment. Even allowing for the vagaries of statistical chance (perhaps explaining both the increase in mortality with tirofiban in PRISM-PLUS and the decrease in long-term adverse events with lamifiban), monotherapy of parenteral GP IIb/IIIa antagonists (without heparin) cannot be endorsed. Great uncertainty remains regarding optimal dosing and duration of treatment. Furthermore, a "dose ceiling" may exist (as observed in PARAGON-A) beyond which further dose escalation results in bleeding without improvements in efficacy. The differences in treatment effect among regions of the world (noted in PURSUIT) are counterintuitive; whether confounding factors could augment (or detract from) the overall effect will be ascertained through further analyses. Finally, it would be erroneous to conclude that important treatment differences exist among the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists given our current fund of knowledge; the clinical trials conducted thus far are dissimilar enough to invalidate direct comparisons, and head-to-head comparisons have not been undertaken.
Acute Coronary Syndromes: Acute MI
Until recently, overriding concern about the potential for
intracranial hemorrhage induced by GP IIb/IIIa inhibition
coupled with heparin, aspirin, and thrombolytic therapy
has precluded the large-scale investigation of GP IIb/IIIa
antagonists in acute MI. Because the accrued clinical
experience with GP IIb/IIIa blockade demonstrates rates of intracranial
hemorrhage comparable to those observed with
thrombolytic therapy (<1%), the investigation of GP
IIb/IIIa inhibition in this setting has
intensified.13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 Two potential
strategies have emerged: combination therapy (with reduced-dose
thrombolytics and GP IIb/IIIa blockade) and adjunctive
GP IIb/IIIa blockade during direct angioplasty.
The goal of combination therapy is to combat the limitations of conventional thrombolytic therapy. Pioneering work by Gold and colleagues39 in a canine model of coronary thrombosis demonstrated 3 effects of combination therapy (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA] and m7E3): increased reperfusion, accelerated thrombolysis, and sustained vascular patency. Clinically, several small trials have yielded encouraging results. Ohman and colleagues,40 in a dose-ranging study of eptifibatide combined with tPA, documented significant improvement in 90-minute TIMI 3 (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3) flow rates at the highest doses of eptifibatide compared with tPA alone (66% versus 39%; P=0.006). In PARADIGM, a dose-exploration study of lamifiban in 353 patients, improved patency kinetics (ascertained by continuous ECG monitoring) were observed with combination therapy versus thrombolytic therapy alone.26 Recently, the TIMI 14A investigators reported a 643-patient dose-finding study to determine whether full-dose abciximab combined with reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy improves angiographic outcomes compared with thrombolytic therapy alone. Patients with acute MI were randomized to 1 of 5 strategies: (1) full-dose accelerated tPA (100 mg), (2) full-dose streptokinase (1.5 million U), (3) abciximab with low-dose tPA, (4) abciximab with low-dose streptokinase, or (5) abciximab alone. In total, 15 dose permutations were evaluated. Ninety-minute angiography demonstrated higher coronary artery reperfusion rates with abciximab and low-dose tPA (50 mg) than with accelerated tPA alone (79% TIMI 3 flow rate versus 58% with tPA alone).41
Regarding the utility of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition with direct angioplasty, the RAPPORT (ReoPro in Acute myocardial infarction and Primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial) investigators studied 483 patients who were randomized to receive either placebo or abciximab followed by emergency cardiac catheterization with the intent to perform angioplasty.25 By intention-to-treat analysis, the 30-day combined incidence of death, MI, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was not significantly different between groups (5.8% with abciximab versus 9.9% with placebo; P=NS). However, by treated-patient analysis (patients receiving both abciximab and direct angioplasty), there was a 74% relative reduction in the composite end point (2.8% versus 10.6%; P=0.006). These results were offset by a near doubling of major bleeding (16.6% in abciximab-treated patients versus 9.5% in controls).
In the setting of acute MI, several preliminary conclusions are appropriate. First, combination therapy appears promising and warrants definitive investigation. Second, adjunctive therapy during direct angioplasty yields a similar treatment effect as that observed in elective angioplasty. As with elective intervention, fastidious attention to heparin dosing and sheath management is required to further improve the safety profile.
Oral GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists
Oral GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are being investigated
for secondary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity
and mortality (Table 1
). Through long-term suppression of platelet
aggregation, outcomes might be improved by inhibiting spontaneous
vascular thrombosis and reducing thromboembolic events. Early
experience with these drugs raised concerns regarding the potential for
bleeding with long-term therapy.16 17 18 In the
TIMI-12 safety study of 223 patients treated with sibrafiban or
aspirin,18 major bleeding did not differ among
treatment groups (1.5% with sibrafiban versus 1.9% with aspirin);
however, minor bleeding occurred in 32% of patients treated at the
highest doses of sibrafiban. Important predictors of minor bleeding
included total daily dose, twice-daily dosing schedule, and diminished
renal function. Whether therapeutic goals can be realized with oral
antagonists and whether side effects will prove limiting
remain to be seen.
Conclusions
The journey leading to the clinical introduction of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists is a remarkable example of successful collaboration among basic scientists, clinical investigators, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory agencies. Clinical trial results have documented clear-cut efficacy with a favorable safety profile in a variety of settings. Issues precluding universal adoption include the requirement for prophylactic therapy (requiring treatment of many to benefit a few), the potential for bleeding and other adverse effects (not negligible), and costs. The greatest clinical benefits have been observed with short-term outcomes; what is required to achieve long-term gain is still unknown. Perhaps the most fundamental issue remains optimal dosing. Development of point-of-care testing for measuring platelet aggregation will allow us to address this question. Although much has already been discovered, resulting in significant improvements in patient outcomes, many questions remain to be answered on this unique path of discovery.
References
1.
Lefkovits J, Plow EF, Topol EJ. Platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors in
cardiovascular medicine. N Engl J
Med. 1995;332:15531559.
2. Fuster V, Fallon JT, Nemerson Y. Coronary thrombosis. Lancet. 1996;348(suppl 1):s7s10.
3. Coller BS. A new murine monoclonal antibody reports an activation-dependent change in the conformation and/or microenvironment of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:101108.
4.
Phillips DR, Charo IF, Parise LV, Fitzgerald LA. The
platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex.
Blood. 1988;71:831843.
5.
Pytela R, Pierschbacher MD, Ginsberg MH, Plow EF,
Ruoslahti E. Platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa:
member of a family of Arg-Gly-Asp specific adhesion receptors.
Science. 1986;231:15591562.
6. Crenshaw BS, Harrington RA, Tcheng JE. Novel antiplatelet agents: the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1995;4:10331044.
7. Coller BS. Platelets and thrombolytic therapy. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:3342.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Hynes R. Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors. Cell. 1987;48:549554.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Tcheng JE. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors: putting the EPIC, IMPACT II, RESTORE, and EPILOG trials into perspective. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:3540.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Phillips DR, Agin PP. Platelet membrane defects in Glanzmann's thrombasthenia: evidence for decreased amounts of two major glycoproteins. J Clin Invest. 1977;60:535545.
11. Phillips DR, Charo IF, Scarborough RM. GPIIb-IIIa: the responsive integrin. Cell. 1991;65:359362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Coller BS, Peerschke EI, Scudder LE, Sullivan CA. A murine monoclonal antibody that completely blocks the binding of fibrinogen to platelets produces a thrombasthenic-like state in normal platelets and binds to glycoproteins IIb and/or IIIa. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:325338.
13.
EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody
directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl
J Med. 1994;330:956961.
14. The CAPTURE Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE study. Lancet. 1997;349:14291435.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose
heparin during percutaneous coronary
revascularization. N Engl J
Med. 1997;336:16891696.
16.
Simpfendorfer C, Kottke-Marchant K, Lowrie M, Anders
RJ, Burns DM, Miller DP, Cove CS, DeFranco AC, Ellis SG, Moliterno DJ,
Raymond RE, Sutton JM, Topol EJ. First chronic platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade: a randomized,
placebo-controlled pilot study of xemilofiban in unstable angina with
percutaneous coronary interventions.
Circulation. 1997;96:7681.
17.
Kereiakes DJ, Runyon JP, Kleiman NS, Higby NA,
Anderson LC, Hantsbarger G, McDonald S, Anders RJ. Differential dose
response to oral xemilofiban after antecedent intravenous
abciximab: administration for complex coronary intervention.
Circulation. 1996;94:906910.
18.
Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Borzak S, Henry TD, Tischler MD,
Mueller HS, Feldman R, Palmeri ST, Hamilton SA, Rothman JM, Novotny WF,
Braunwald E, for the TIMI 12 Investigators. Randomized trial of an oral
platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist,
sibrafiban, in patients after an acute coronary syndrome.
Circulation. 1998;97:340349.
19.
Mascelli MA, Lance ET, Damaraju L, Wagner CL, Weisman
HF, Jordan RE. Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term abciximab
treatment demonstrates prolonged platelet inhibition with gradual
recovery from GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Circulation. 1998;97:16801688.
20. The IMPACT II Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: IMPACT II. Lancet. 1997;349:14221428.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse
cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial
infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty.
Circulation. 1997;96:14451453.
22.
Ferguson JJ. Meeting highlights: 46th annual scientific
sessions of the American College of Cardiology.
Circulation. 1997;96:367371.
23.
The PARAGON Investigators. International, randomized,
controlled trial of lamifiban (a platelet glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa inhibitor), heparin, or both in unstable angina.
Circulation. 1998;97:23862395.
24.
The PURSUIT Trial Investigators. Inhibition of platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary
syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:436443.
25.
Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JEB, Katz S, George BS,
Jones AA, Cohen ED, Gainey PC, White HJ, Cheek HB, Moses JW, Moliterno
DJ, Effron MB, Topol EJ, on behalf of the RePro and Primary PTCA
Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators. Randomized,
placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade
with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1998;98:734741.
26. Alexander K, Barsness GW, Miller JM, Tung CY. Session highlights from the American College of Cardiology meeting: March 1619, 1997. Am Heart J. 1997;134:138154.
27. Ellis SG, Serruys PW, Popma JJ, Teirstein PS, Ricci DR, Gold HK, Effron MB. Can abciximab prevent neointimal proliferation in Palmaz-Schatz stents? The final ERASER results. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-87. Abstract.
28.
Topol EJ, Ferguson JJ, Weisman HF, Tcheng JE, Ellis SG,
Kleiman NS, Ivanhoe RJ, Wang AL, Miller DP, Anderson KM, Califf RM.
Long-term protection from myocardial ischemic events in a
randomized trial of brief integrin ß3 blockade with
percutaneous coronary intervention: EPIC
Investigator Group: Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition for
Prevention of Ischemic Complication. JAMA. 1997;278:479484.
29. Adgey JAA. Overview of the results of clinical trials with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Am Heart J. 1998;135(suppl):S43S55.
30.
Tcheng JE, Ellis SG, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman
NS, Talley JD, Wang AL, Weisman HF, Califf RM, Topol EJ.
Pharmacodynamics of chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin
antiplatelet antibody Fab 7E3 in high-risk coronary
angioplasty. Circulation. 1994;90:17571764.
31. Harrington RA, Kleiman NS, Kottke-Marchant K, Lincoff MA, Tcheng JE, Sigmon KN, Joseph DM, Rios G, Trainor K, Rose D, Greenberg CS, Kitt MM, Topol EJ, Califf RM. Immediate and reversible platelet inhibition after intravenous administration of a peptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:12221227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Phillips DR, Teng W, Arfsten A, Nannizzi-Alaimo
L, White MM, Longhurst C, Shattil SJ, Randolph A, Jakubowski JA,
Jennings LK, Scarborough RM. Effect of Ca2+ on GP
IIb-IIIa interactions with Integrilin: enhanced GP IIb-IIIa binding and
inhibition of platelet aggregation by reductions in the
concentration of ionized calcium in plasma anticoagulated with citrate.
Circulation. 1997;96:14881494.
33. Kereiakes DJ, Essell JH, Abbottsmith CW, Broderick TM, Runyon JP. Abciximab-associated profound thrombocytopenia: therapy with immunoglobulin and platelet transfusion. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:11611163.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Berkowitz SD, Harrington RA, Rund MM, Tcheng JE. Acute
profound thrombocytopenia after c7E3 Fab (abciximab) therapy.
Circulation. 1997;95:809813.
35. Berkowitz SD, Harrington RA, Rund MM, Tcheng JE. Acute profound thrombocytopenia after c7E3 Fab (abciximab) therapy. Circulation. 1997;96:3810. Letter.
36. Bednar B, Bednar RA, Cook JJ, Bollag DM, Chang CT, Stanley LG, McQueney PA, Egberton MS, Hartman GD, Holahan MA, Lynch JJ, Gould RJ. Drug-dependent antibodies against GP IIb/IIIa induce thrombocytopenia. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-99. Abstract.
37. Topol EJ, Califf RM, Weisman HF, Ellis SG, Tcheng JE, Worley S, Ivanhoe R, George BS, Fintel D, Weston M, Sigmon K, Anderson KM, Lee KL, Willerson JT, on behalf of the EPIC Investigators. Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. Lancet. 1994;343:881886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet. 1998;352:8792.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Gold HK, Coller BS, Yasuda T, Saito T, Fallon JT,
Guerrero JL, Leinbach RC, Ziskind AA, Collen D. Rapid and sustained
coronary artery recanalization with combined bolus injection of
recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and monoclonal
antiplatelet GPIIb/IIIa antibody in a canine preparation.
Circulation. 1988;77:670677.
40.
Ohman EM, Kleiman NS, Gacioch G, Worley SJ, Navetta FI,
Talley JD, Anderson HV, Ellis SG, Cohen MD, Spriggs D, Miller M,
Kereiakes D, Yakubov S, Kitt MM, Sigmon KN, Califf RM, Krucoff MW,
Topol EJ, for the IMPACT-AMI Investigators. Combined accelerated
tissue-plasminogen activator and platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin receptor blockade with
Integrilin in acute myocardial infarction: results of a randomized,
placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Circulation. 1997;95:846854.
41. Antman EM, Giugliano RP, McCabe CH, Gibson M, Adgey AJJ, Ghali M, Coussement P, Anderson KM, Scherer J, Van der Werf F, Braunwald E, for the TIMI-14 Investigators. Abciximab (ReoPro) potentiates thrombolysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI 14 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:191A. Abstract.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Spinosa, D. A. Leung, A. H. Matsumoto, E. A. Bissonette, D. Cage, N. L. Harthun, J. A. Kern, J. F. Angle, K. D. Hagspiel, I. K. Crosby, et al. Percutaneous Intentional Extraluminal Recanalization in Patients with Chronic Critical Limb Ischemia Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 499 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Tcheng and M. E. Campbell Platelet inhibition strategies in percutaneous coronary intervention: Competition or coopetition? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2003; 42(7): 1196 - 1198. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Tcheng, D. E. Kandzari, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, M. B. Effron, E. Garcia, J. J. Griffin, G. Guagliumi, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, et al. Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1316 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D L Brown Deaths associated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment Heart, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 535 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chun, B. A. Orser, and M. Madan Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors: Overview and Implications for the Anesthesiologist Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 879 - 888. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Al Suwaidi, D. N. Reddan, K. Williams, K. S. Pieper, R. A. Harrington, R. M. Califf, C. B. Granger, E. M. Ohman, D. R. Holmes Jr, and for the GUSTO-IIb, GUSTO-III, PURSUIT, and PARAGON Prognostic Implications of Abnormalities in Renal Function in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, August 20, 2002; 106(8): 974 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-C. Chang, R.A. Harrington, M.L. Simoons, R.M. Califf, A.M. Lincoff, and P.W. Armstrong Does eptifibatide confer a greater benefit to patients with unstable angina than with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction?. Insights from the PURSUIT Trial Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2002; 23(14): 1102 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, D. J. Moliterno, M. Bertrand, F.-J. Neumann, H. C. Herrmann, E. R. Powers, C. L. Grines, J. W. Moses, D. J. Cohen, E. A. Cohen, et al. Impact of Clinical Syndrome Acuity on the Differential Response to 2 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting: The TARGET Trial* Circulation, May 21, 2002; 105(20): 2347 - 2354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Jacobin, J. Laroche-Traineau, M. Little, A. Keller, K. Peter, M. Welschof, A. Nurden, and G. Clofent-Sanchez Human IgG Monoclonal Anti-{alpha}IIb{beta}3-Binding Fragments Derived from Immunized Donors Using Phage Display J. Immunol., February 15, 2002; 168(4): 2035 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. O'Shea, C. E. Buller, W. J. Cantor, A. B. Chandler, E. A. Cohen, D. J. Cohen, I. C. Gilchrist, N. S. Kleiman, M. Labinaz, M. Madan, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Integrin Blockade With Eptifibatide in Coronary Stent Intervention JAMA, February 6, 2002; 287(5): 618 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. Tcheng, J. Strony, T.J. Lorenz, and J.C. O'Shea ESPRIT in context: pharmacology matters! Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 1965 - 1967. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Tcheng, D. J. Kereiakes, A. M. Lincoff, B. S. George, N. S. Kleiman, D. C. Sane, D. B. Cines, R. E. Jordan, M. A. Mascelli, M. A. Langrall, et al. Abciximab Readministration: Results of the ReoPro Readministration Registry Circulation, August 21, 2001; 104(8): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Gilchrist, J. C. O'Shea, T. Kosoglou, L. K. Jennings, T. J. Lorenz, M. M. Kitt, N. S. Kleiman, D. Talley, F. Aguirre, C. Davidson, et al. Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Higher-Dose, Double-Bolus Eptifibatide in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circulation, July 24, 2001; 104(4): 406 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. E. Olorundare, O. Peyruchaud, R. M. Albrecht, and D. F. Mosher Assembly of a fibronectin matrix by adherent platelets stimulated by lysophosphatidic acid and other agonists Blood, July 1, 2001; 98(1): 117 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Wu and J. T. Willerson Monitoring Platelet Function in Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Therapy Circulation, May 29, 2001; 103(21): 2528 - 2530. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. O'Shea, G. E. Hafley, S. Greenberg, V. Hasselblad, T. J. Lorenz, M. M. Kitt, J. Strony, J. E. Tcheng, and for the ESPRIT Investigators Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Integrin Blockade With Eptifibatide in Coronary Stent Intervention: The ESPRIT Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, May 16, 2001; 285(19): 2468 - 2473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Przyklenk and P. Whittaker Brief Antecedent Ischemia Enhances Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Induced Coronary Thrombolysis by Adenosine-Mediated Mechanism Circulation, July 4, 2000; 102(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Harrington Cardiac enzyme elevations after percutaneous coronary intervention: myonecrosis, the coronary microcirculation and mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5): 1142 - 1144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yeghiazarians, J. B. Braunstein, A. Askari, and P. H. Stone Unstable Angina Pectoris N. Engl. J. Med., January 13, 2000; 342(2): 101 - 114. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Smith and J. L. Mehta Reviews: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Conquests and New Challenges Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(3): 143 - 150. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Armstrong Unsticking platelets: the role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(11): 1423 - 1424. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Scarborough, N. S. Kleiman, and D. R. Phillips Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Antagonists : What Are the Relevant Issues Concerning Their Pharmacology and Clinical Use? Circulation, July 27, 1999; 100(4): 437 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Kennedy and M. L. Stadius Combined Thrombolytic and Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction : Will Pharmacological Therapy Ever Equal Primary Angioplasty? Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2714 - 2716. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |