From the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (S.J.B., D.J.M.,
E.J.T.); Midwest Heart Research, Lombard, Ill (L.A.B.); University of
Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (J.E.B.B.); North Shore University
Hospital, Manhasset, NY (S.K.); Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
(B.S.G.); Crozer Chester Medical Center, Upland, Pa (A.A.J.); Baptist Medical
Center, Birmingham, Ala (E.D.C.); St Joseph Hospital, Savannah, Ga (P.C.G.);
Presbyterian Health Care Center, Albuquerque, NM (H.J.W.); High Point Regional
Hospital, High Point, NC (H.B.C.); Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY (J.W.M.);
and Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind (M.B.E.).
Correspondence to Eric J. Topol, MD, Department of Cardiology, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail topole{at}cesmtp.ccf.org
Methods and ResultsPatients with acute MI of <12 hours'
duration were randomized, on a double-blind basis, to placebo or
abciximab if they were deemed candidates for primary PTCA. The primary
efficacy end point was death, reinfarction, or any (urgent or elective)
target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6 months
by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Other key prespecified
end points were early (7 and 30 days) death, reinfarction, or urgent
TVR. The baseline clinical and angiographic variables of the 483
(242 placebo and 241 abciximab) patients were balanced. There was no
difference in the incidence of the primary 6-month end point (ITT
analysis) in the 2 groups (28.1% and 28.2%,
P=0.97, of the placebo and abciximab patients,
respectively). However, abciximab significantly reduced the incidence
of death, reinfarction, or urgent TVR at all time points assessed
(9.9% versus 3.3%, P=0.003, at 7 days; 11.2% versus
5.8%, P=0.03, at 30 days; and 17.8% versus 11.6%,
P=0.05, at 6 months). Analysis by actual
treatment with PTCA and study drug demonstrated a considerable effect
of abciximab with respect to death or reinfarction: 4.7% versus 1.4%,
P=0.047, at 7 days; 5.8% versus 3.2%,
P=0.20, at 30 days; and 12.0% versus 6.9%,
P=0.07, at 6 months. The need for unplanned,
"bail-out" stenting was reduced by 42% in the abciximab group
(20.4% versus 11.9%, P=0.008). Major bleeding occurred
significantly more frequently in the abciximab group (16.6% versus
9.5%, P=0.02), mostly at the arterial
access site. There was no intracranial hemorrhage in either
group.
ConclusionsAggressive platelet inhibition with abciximab
during primary PTCA for acute MI yielded a substantial reduction in the
acute (30-day) phase for death, reinfarction, and urgent target vessel
revascularization. However, the bleeding rates were
excessive, and the 6-month primary end point, which included elective
revascularization, was not favorably affected.
Primary balloon angioplasty for acute MI is associated with a 5% to
15% rate of in-hospital major ischemic
complications6 7 8 9 10 11 and subsequent repeat
revascularization in 35% of
patients.12 13 Most of the acute events are
related to reocclusion of the infarct artery. Marked platelet
activation with increased surface expression of the IIb/IIIa receptor,
present during the first few days after successful primary PTCA,
contributes significantly to this process.14 In a
small subgroup of the Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of
Ischemic Complications (EPIC) trial, consisting of 64 patients
undergoing catheter-based reperfusion for acute MI, a substantial
clinical benefit was conferred by abciximab.15 We
hypothesized that platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with
abciximab would reduce both acute ischemic events, manifested
by death, reinfarction, or urgent
revascularization, and late restenosis, as
reflected by elective revascularization. We
performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test this
hypothesis.
Acute MI was defined as ischemic chest pain lasting >20
minutes and accompanied by significant ST-segment elevation in 2
contiguous leads or by a new complete left bundle-branch block pattern.
Before angioplasty, a 100-U/kg heparin bolus was given, followed by
additional weight-adjusted doses to maintain an activated
clotting time >300 seconds during the procedure. Only balloon
angioplasty and directional atherectomy were permitted as
catheter-based strategies. Stent implantation was discouraged but was
allowed for large residual dissections with >50% stenosis and
for abrupt or threatened vessel closure. Early (<6 hours) sheath
removal was strongly encouraged.4 16 Avoidance of
routine venous sheath placement was recommended. Heparin could be
continued for a maximum of 48 hours, with an activated partial
thromboplastin time of 60 to 85 seconds maintained. All patients
received aspirin, and the rest of their medical regimen was left to the
investigator's discretion.
Patients were excluded from the study for severe thrombocytopenia,
baseline prothrombin time >1.2 times control, ongoing internal
bleeding or recent major surgery, previous stroke, severe uncontrolled
hypertension, PTCA of the infarct artery within 3 months, cardiogenic
shock or prolonged resuscitation, vasculitis, prior administration of
abciximab or fibrinolytic therapy, or inability to give written
informed consent. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review
Board at each participating site.
Study End Points
All clinical end points were independently adjudicated by a clinical
events committee, who reviewed the case report forms, hospital
records, and ECG and enzymatic data. All angiograms were reviewed
by a central angiographic laboratory. Reinfarction within 24 hours of
randomization was defined as a reelevation of CK-MB by at least 33% or
100% from the preceding nadir (which was
Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Angiographic and Procedural Data
Acute-Phase Clinical Events: 7- and 30-Day Outcomes
Late Clinical Events: 6-Month Outcome
Compared with placebo, the cumulative need for urgent TVR at 6 months
was significantly reduced by abciximab, 8.7% versus 3.3%,
P=0.02 (ITT analysis) and 10.5% versus 3.7%,
P=0.006 (AT analysis). Total TVR (urgent and
elective) was not significantly affected by abciximab, showing
equivalent rates of repeat procedures in both groups from hospital
discharge onward. Approximately one third of the
revascularization procedures in each group (6.6%
of placebo and 8.3% of abciximab patients) consisted of CABG,
reflecting the high incidence of diffuse, multivessel coronary
disease in this cohort.
Unplanned Stent Implantation
Bleeding Complications
Comparison With Other Trials of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
Blockade in Interventional Cardiology
Lack of Effect on Elective Revascularization
Bleeding Complications
Role of Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade in Primary
Angioplasty
Besides affecting the patency of the infarct vessel, platelet
aggregates can also be embolized distally and impair the
microvasculature of the infarcted territory. Neumann et
al29 compared the outcomes of 200 patients
undergoing primary or rescue stenting of the infarct artery with or
without adjunct abciximab. As in our study, at 30 days, the
abciximab-treated patients had less death, reinfarction, and urgent
revascularization (2% versus 9%,
P=0.031) than the usual-care group. In addition, by 14 days,
abciximab-treated patients demonstrated higher peak flow velocity in
the infarct artery and improved wall motion index score and global
ejection fraction independently of the acute angiographic results.
These preliminary data suggested that platelet blockade can reduce
early recurrent ischemia and lessen the degree of
microcirculatory dysfunction, even in patients treated with stents. Two
ongoing trials, Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation
to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) and
Abciximab Before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial
Infarction Regarding Acute and Long-term Follow-up (ADMIRAL), are
currently evaluating the long-term effect of the combination of
abciximab and primary stenting for acute MI.
Limitations of the Study
In summary, compared with placebo, platelet IIb/IIIa receptor
blockade with primary angioplasty for acute MI does not affect the
incidence of death, reinfarction, or any
revascularization of the infarct vessel at 6
months. This is attributable to a lack of effect on subsequent elective
revascularization. However, this strategy markedly
reduces the incidence of death, reinfarction, and urgent
revascularization during the acute phase, and this
benefit was sustained throughout the follow-up period. The magnitude
and direction of the effect are highly consistent with previous
trials of platelet inhibition in interventional
cardiology in the elective setting. These findings have
important implications for improving outcomes in the large number of
patients undergoing catheter-based reperfusion for acute MI.
Received April 1, 1998;
accepted May 5, 1998.
2.
Gasperetti CM, Gonias SL, Gimple LW, Powers ER.
Platelet activation during coronary angioplasty in humans.
Circulation. 1993;88:27282734.
3.
The EPIC Investigators. Use of monoclonal antibody
directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl
J Med. 1994;330:956961.
4.
The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose
heparin during percutaneous coronary
revascularization. N Engl J
Med. 1997;336:16891696.
5.
The CAPTURE Investigators. Randomized
placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during
coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the
CAPTURE study. Lancet. 1997;349:14291435.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Rothbaum D, Linnemeier T, Landin R, Steinmetz E,
Hillis J, Hallam C, Noble R, See M. Emergency
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
in acute myocardial infarction: a 3 year experience. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:264272.[Abstract]
7.
Ellis S, O'Neill W, Bates E, Walton J, Nabel E, Werns
S, Topol E. Implications for patient triage from survival and left
ventricular functional recovery analyses in 500
patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial
infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:12511259.[Abstract]
8.
Kahn J, Rutherford B, McConahay D, Johnson W, Giorgi
L, Shimshak T, Ligon R, Hartzler G. Results of primary angioplasty for
acute myocardial infarction in patients with multivessel
coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:10891096.[Abstract]
9.
Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW,
O'Keefe J, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, Timmis GC, Vlietstra RV,
Strzelecki M, Puchrowicz-Ochocki S, O'Neill WW, for the Primary
Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. A comparison of
immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for
acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673679.
10.
Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR,
Hopfenspirger MR, Gersh BJ. Immediate angioplasty compared with
the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by
conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. N Engl
J Med. 1993;328:685691.
11.
de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Ottervanger JP, Reiffers S,
Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F. Immediate coronary angioplasty
versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial
infarction: left ventricular ejection fraction, hospital
mortality and reinfarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:10041008.[Abstract]
12.
Simonton CA, Mark DB, Hinohara T, Rendall DS, Phillips
HR, Peter RH, Behar VS, Kong Y, O'Callaghan WG, O'Connor C, Califf
RM, Stack RS. Late restenosis after emergent coronary
angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: comparison with elective
coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:698705.[Abstract]
13.
Brodie BR, Grines CL, Ivanhoe R, Knopf W, Taylor G,
O'Keefe J, Weintraub RA, Berdan LG, Tcheng JE, Woodlief LH, Califf RM,
O'Neill WW. Six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up after direct
angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: final results from the
Primary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation. 1994;90:156162.
14.
Gawaz M, Neumann F-JJ, Ott I, Schiessler A, Schomig A.
Platelet function in acute myocardial infarction treated with
direct angioplasty. Circulation. 1996;93:229237.
15.
Lefkovits J, Ivanhoe RJ, Califf RM, Bergelson BA,
Anderson KM, Stoner GL, Weisman HF, Topol EJ, EPIC Investigators.
Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor
blockade by a chimeric monoclonal antibody (abciximab) on acute and
six-month outcomes after percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:10451051.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Lincoff AM, Tcheng JE, Califf RM, Bass T, Popma JJ,
Teirstein PS, Kleiman NS, Hattel LJ, Anderson HV, Ferguson JJ, Cabot
CF, Anderson KM, Berdan LG, Musco MH, Weisman HF, Topol EJ, PROLOG
Investigators. Standard versus low-dose weight-adjusted heparin in
patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during
percutaneous coronary
revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:286291.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Lee PM. Bayesian Statistics: An
Introduction. New York, NY: Arnold Publishing; 1989.
18.
The IMPACT-II Investigators. Randomized
placebo-controlled trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of
percutaneous coronary intervention: IMPACT-II.
Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary
Thrombosis-II. Lancet. 1997;349:14221428.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
The RESTORE Investigators. Effects of platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse
cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial
infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty: Randomized Efficacy
Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis.
Circulation. 1997;96:14451453.
20.
The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody
directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl
J Med. 1994;330:956961.
21.
Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betrieu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F,
Garcia E, Grinfeld L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, DeWood MA, Ribichini F,
for the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs.
Thrombolysis Collaboration Group. Primary coronary
angioplasty vs. intravenous thrombolysis
for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview
of their comparative effectiveness. JAMA. 1997;278:20932098.
22.
Iwabuchi M, Haruta S, Taguchi A, Ichikawa Y, Genda T,
Katai S, Imaoka T, Shimuzu Y, Owa M. Intravascular ultrasound findings
after successful primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:
predictors of abrupt occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:14371444.[Abstract]
23.
Weinberger I, Fuchs J, Davidson E, Rotenberg Z.
Circulating aggregated platelets, number of platelets per
aggregate, and platelet size during acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:981983.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Saito S, Hosokawa G. Primary Palmaz-Schatz stent
implantation for acute myocardial infarction: the final results of
Japanese PASTA (Primary Angioplasty vs Stent Implantation in AMI in
Japan) trial. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-595. Abstract.
25.
Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, Morice M-C, Costantini
C, Overlie PA, St Goar FG, Popma JJ, McDonnell J, Jones D, Grines CL.
Improved short-term outcomes of primary stenting compared to primary
angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PAMI Stent Pilot Trial.
Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-594. Abstract.
26.
Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JCA, de Boer M-J, Zijlstra F.
Randomized comparison of primary stenting with primary balloon
angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.
1997;96(suppl I):I-327. Abstract.
27.
Antoniucci D, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, Valenti R,
Trapani M, Moschi G, Taddeucci E, Dovellini EV, Fazzini PF. A
prospective randomized trial of elective stenting in acute myocardial
infarction: preliminary results of the FRESCO Study (Florence
Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusion).
Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-327. Abstract.
28.
Rodriguez A, Fernandez M, Bernardi V, Mauvecin C,
Santaera O, Martinez J, Mele E, Ambrose J, Roubin G, Palacios I, for
the GRAMI Investigators. Coronary stents improved hospital
results during coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial
infarction: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study (GRAMI
Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:221A. Abstract.
29.
Neumann F-JJ, Blasini R, Dirschinger J, Claus S, Alt E,
Gawaz MP, Fakhoury L, Huppmann R, Schomig A. Intracoronary
stent implantation and antithrombotic regimen in acute myocardial
infarction: randomized placebo-controlled trial of the fibrinogen
receptor antagonist abciximab. Circulation.
1997;96(suppl I):I-399. Abstract.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade With Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
BackgroundThe benefit of
catheter-based reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is
limited by a 5% to 15% incidence of in-hospital major
ischemic events, usually caused by infarct artery reocclusion,
and a 20% to 40% need for repeat percutaneous or
surgical revascularization. Platelets play a
key role in the process of early infarct artery reocclusion, but
inhibition of aggregation via the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor has not been prospectively evaluated in the setting of
acute MI.
Key Words: angioplasty myocardial infarction platelet aggregation inhibitors
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
Platelets play a
pivotal role in the initiation of ischemic complications after
percutaneous coronary
intervention.1 2 Recently, a new class of
platelet antagonists directed against the platelet
membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor has undergone
extensive clinical testing. One of these agents, abciximab
(ReoPro, Centocor), a human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody
directed against this receptor, affects the final common pathway of
platelet aggregation. In 3 large, randomized, placebo-controlled
clinical trials of percutaneous coronary
intervention, abciximab reduced the 30-day incidence of death, nonfatal
myocardial infarction (MI), or need for urgent
revascularization by
40%.3 4 5
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
Patient Enrollment and Study Protocol
Enrollment took place from November 16, 1995, to February 2,
1997, in 36 centers (see Appendix
). Patients within 12 hours of the
onset of acute MI, referred for primary angioplasty, were randomly
assigned to abciximab, administered as a 0.25-mg/kg bolus followed by a
12-hour infusion of 0.125 µg ·
kg-1 · min-1
(maximum, 10 µg/min), or to matching placebo, in a double-blind
fashion. Study drug administration before diagnostic
angiography was permitted.
The primary efficacy end point was the composite of death from
any cause, nonfatal reinfarction, or any (percutaneous
or surgical) repeat target vessel revascularization
within 6 months. The acute-phase end points were the composite of
death, reinfarction, or urgent target vessel
revascularization at 7 and 30 days. Safety was
assessed by the incidence of major bleeding
(intracerebral hemorrhage or a >5 g% adjusted
decline in hemoglobin).
2 or <2 times normal,
respectively) and reached at least a >3 times normal value in
association with ischemic symptoms. After 24 hours,
reinfarction was defined as new pathological Q waves, or reelevation of
CK-MB to >3 times normal (24 hours to discharge) or >2 times normal
(after hospital discharge). Urgent target vessel
revascularization (TVR) was defined as repeat
percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG
performed within 24 hours of severe recurrent ischemic
symptoms. Repeat angiography and revascularization
were performed, in general, in response to clinical signs of recurrent
ischemia.
Data were collected on case report forms by the site
coordinators and forwarded to study monitors for verification. The
investigators, central adjudication committees, and sponsors remained
blinded to treatment allocation until the database was finalized and
the prespecified analyses were performed. The study sample size
and power were determined by Bayesian
calculations17 based on 5 distributions of the
incidence of the primary end point in the EPIC trial population as a
whole,3 the EPIC MI
subgroup,15 and 3 other uniform priors. In
all cases, 450 patients yielded a >80% chance to conclude that there
was a 90% probability that abciximab is better than placebo, assuming
trial event rates of 20% and 30% in the 2 groups, respectively. The
final enrollment goal was extended to 500 patients to yield at least
450 analyzable sets of data, assuming a 10% rate of protocol
violations and incomplete follow-up. The primary analysis was
performed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, with
Bayesian analysis for the primary 6-month end point. A
prespecified secondary analysis was designed to assess the true
effect of the strategy, tested by including only patients who received
study drug and underwent PTCA. Categorical variables were
analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
2
test, Pearson
2 test, and log-rank test for
event-free survival analysis. Continuous variables were
described as medians with interquartile range and were compared by
ANOVA, with effects for treatment, site, and treatment-by-site
interaction.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
Patient Population
A total of 483 patients were randomized. As shown in Table 1
, there were no significant differences
in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics between the groups.
For the secondary analysis of actual treatment (AT) with study
drug and PTCA, 74 patients (51 in the placebo and 23 in the abciximab
groups) were excluded for the following reasons: PTCA not performed in
33 and 21, incorrect or no study drug administration in 16 and 0, and
inclusion criteria not met in 2 and 2, leaving 191 and 218 patients in
the 2 groups, respectively. Early drug administration (
30 minutes
before first balloon inflation) occurred in 19% and 21% of the 2
groups, respectively. Follow-up was complete in 99.2% of patients at
30 days and 97.7% at 6 months.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Baseline Demographic and Hemodynamic
Characteristics
The anatomic and procedural features are summarized in Table 2
. As determined by the central
angiographic laboratory, Thrombolysis in Myocardial
Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow was achieved in 84.8% and 85.3% of the
placebo- and abciximab-treated patients with attempted intervention,
respectively, P=0.57. The need for bail-out stenting was
reduced in the abciximab group by 33% and 42% (ITT and AT
analysis, respectively).
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Angiographic and Procedural Variables in the 2
Treatment Groups
As shown in Tables 3 (ITT
analysis) and 4 (AT
analysis), the composite end point of death, repeat MI, or
urgent TVR was significantly less common in patients treated with
abciximab compared with placebo. The AT analysis revealed
further amplification of the benefit observed in the whole cohort. As
shown in Figure 1
, the event curves for
the 30-day composite end point separated as early as day 1. Much of the
composite end point benefit afforded by abciximab was related to a 75%
decrease in urgent TVR, which inherently substantially affected (29%
to 44%) the incidence of total TVR (urgent and elective).
Nevertheless, the rate of elective TVR, mostly via coronary
bypass surgery, was not significantly different between the 2 groups.
The 3% to 5% difference in total TVR favoring the abciximab group and
due to less urgent TVR observed at 7 days was maintained at 30 days,
without incremental benefit.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Probability of death, repeat MI, or urgent TVR
(Revasc.) within 30 days in abciximab (solid line) and placebo (dashed
line) groups by ITT analysis. Kaplan-Meier plot. Pts indicates
patients.
At 6 months, the primary end point occurred in 28.1% of the
placebo and 28.2% of the abciximab patients (P=0.97, Table 3
, Figure 2
) by ITT analysis and
in 31.9% and 28.0%, respectively (P=0.36, Table 4
) by AT
analysis. On the basis of Bayesian analysis, there was
an 80% probability that abciximab is superior to placebo and a 38%
probability that this advantage exceeded 5% in absolute terms. Early
drug administration was not associated with better outcome.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Outcome in the Treatment Groups by ITT
Analysis

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Probability of death, repeat MI, or TVR (Revasc.)
within 6 months in abciximab (solid line) and placebo (dashed line)
groups by ITT analysis. Kaplan-Meier plot. Pts indicates
patients.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 4. Outcome in the Treatment Groups by AT
Analysis
Treatment allocation did not affect the primary 6-month end point
in patients undergoing only PTCA (n=359) or unplanned stenting (n=70).
Compared with PTCA, unplanned stent use, independently of treatment
allocation, was associated with a lower incidence of death, MI, or TVR
(35.7% versus 17.1%; odds ratio, 0.43; CI, 0.21 to 0.87;
P=0.01). Most of the advantage was related to a decreased
need for TVR (12.9% versus 26.2%). The same proportion of patients in
the 2 treatment groups received ticlopidine after hospital discharge
(19.8% and 16.2% between days 7 and 30 and 8.7% and 9.1% between
day 30 and 6-month visit).
Abciximab resulted in a 27-second prolongation of the median
activated clotting time compared with placebo (364 versus 337
seconds, respectively). The sheath dwell time was 17 (8, 25) and 19 (9,
26) hours, respectively, P=0.08. We observed an excess of
major bleeding (16.6% versus 9.5%, P=0.02) and blood
product transfusion (13.7% versus 7.9%, P=0.04) in the
abciximab cohort (Table 5
). There were no
intracranial hemorrhages. Most of the excess major bleeding was
confined to the access site.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 5. Incidence and Site of Bleeding Complications
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
This is the first dedicated randomized trial of platelet
IIb/IIIa blockade for patients with acute MI. Despite a lack of effect
on late elective revascularization, abciximab
yielded a marked acute-phase benefit with respect to major
ischemic events, significantly reducing reinfarction and urgent
revascularization by 5 to 6 events for each 100
patients treated. Although it lacked power to detect statistically
significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the individual
components of the composite end points, the trial demonstrated a
consistent favorable effect of IIb/IIIa blockade on each of the
individual major adverse outcomes. Patients receiving active study drug
and PTCA had a more pronounced effect with respect to reinfarction. As
in other IIb/IIIa trials,3 4 5 the lower rate of
reinfarction was tightly coupled with the lesser need for urgent
revascularization. This consistent
relationship between the 2 outcomes confirms the validity of urgent
revascularization as a surrogate for "harder"
end points, such as reinfarction, in the setting of acute MI. A marked
reduction in the need for urgent revascularization
is especially crucial in patients undergoing primary angioplasty, who
are at high risk for early ischemic events related to
reocclusion. In many patients, the strategy of repeat
revascularization was used to prevent an impending
reinfarction.
Acute-Phase Benefit
Our data confirm the significant (50%) decrease in the 30-day
composite end point of death, repeat MI, or need for urgent TVR
observed in the other 3 large randomized trials of abciximab given
during coronary angioplasty.3 4 5
Importantly, this is the first study to document the effectiveness of
this strategy in patients with acute MI. The extent and magnitude of
the benefit across the trials of abciximab in interventional
cardiology is remarkably consistent and has
been confirmed, in part, for other IIb/IIIa inhibitors in
various clinical settings.18 19
At the time the ReoPro and Primary PTCA Organization and
Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) was designed, data from EPIC suggested a
potential beneficial effect of abciximab on the need for elective
revascularization at 6 months. Since the
present trial was initiated, 2 other large studies, with less
critically ill patients, have not supported this putative benefit.
Thus, it was very unlikely that a much smaller trial in a population
with a high incidence of restenosis would reach a different
conclusion. The consistency of these 3 recent trials with
respect to the composite incidence of death, reinfarction, or the need
for revascularization at 6 months is remarkable:
26% versus 23% in Evaluation of PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome
With Abciximab IIb/IIIa Blockade (EPILOG), 31% versus 31% in c7E3 Fab
Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE),
and 28% versus 28% in RAPPORT, for placebo and abciximab,
respectively. In contrast, in the EPIC trial, patients continued to
have a significant reduction in this composite end point at 6 months
(from 35% for placebo to 27% for abciximab, P=0.001) and
at 3 years (from 47.2% to 41.1%, P=0.009). It should be
noted, however, that the angioplasty performed in the era of the EPIC
trial (1992) was much more conservative and less effective due to
unavailability of stents. This is highlighted by the almost identical
rate of adverse events in the active-treatment groups (28% and 27%),
whereas the placebo group in RAPPORT fared significantly better than
its counterpart in EPIC (28% versus 35%). Furthermore, the very
positive effect of bolus and infusion of abciximab in acute MI patients
in EPIC was based on only 22 patients, an extremely small population,
in which the play of chance can substantially distort the true
significance of the results.
Reminiscent of the EPIC trial,20 the
incidence of major bleeding associated with the strategy tested in this
trial was significantly higher in the abciximab group, reflecting both
the intensity of anticoagulation used during and after the procedure
and the long interval between angioplasty and sheath removal. The
latter was undoubtedly affected by the double-blind design of the
study, which made investigators reluctant to stop heparin for early
sheath removal. Nevertheless, most excess bleeding was confined to the
access site. As in other trials of primary
angioplasty,21 the overall rate of major bleeding
was higher than that observed during elective angioplasty. The
substantially lower incidence of bleeding associated with less intense
anticoagulation and early sheath removal4 16
would indicate that this important drawback of IIb/IIIa blockade can be
alleviated without any compromise in efficacy. In fact, there was a
doubling of efficacy from the original trial to EPILOG, when the
bleeding was markedly reduced.4
Iwabuchi et al22 recently showed that
intravascular ultrasound performed after angiographically successful
primary angioplasty can detect predictors of abrupt vessel closure,
such as smaller lumen and greater plaque areas, and especially the
presence of disrupted plaque and thrombus. Pharmacological and
mechanical interventions may be needed to prevent this event. On one
hand, because platelets avidly aggregate on the disrupted vessel
surface created by the initial plaque rupture23
and subsequent balloon-induced wall trauma, effective blockade of
platelet aggregation at the site of injury may substantially reduce
the risk of abrupt closure. On the other hand, coronary stent
implantation can restore the vessel integrity and improve flow.
Preliminary data from 5 small studies24 25 26 27 28
comparing balloon angioplasty with stenting for acute MI indicated that
stenting reduced the rate of repeat in-hospital
revascularization (usually due to infarct artery
reocclusion) by 50% to 75%, from between 6% and 11% to between 2%
and 4%. Importantly, abciximab in the present trial demonstrated a
beneficial effect of a similar magnitude, which translated to an
incidence of urgent revascularization of only 1.2%
at 7 days and 1.7% at 30 days. Thus, the use of platelet
inhibitors may be particularly valuable in patients who are
not candidates for stenting.
The low overall mortality and the baseline characteristics of the
patients suggest that the more ill patients, for whom the investigators
believed that IIb/IIIa blockade was beneficial, may have been excluded
from enrollment. Without systematic follow-up of patients who were not
enrolled at each institution, we are unable to address this salient
issue. The high incidence of major bleeding in the abciximab arm was
due in part to the double-blind trial design, which led to the
operator's unwillingness to discontinue heparin anticoagulation
immediately after the procedure for early sheath removal. Despite these
potential limitations, the present trial is still one of the
largest trials of primary angioplasty for acute MI with rigorous and
blinded adjudication of clinical and angiographic end points.
![]()
Appendix 1
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
Participating Institutions (Alphabetical Order), Principal
Investigators, and Coordinators
Baptist Medical Center, Little Rock, Ark: Randal F. Hundley, MD,
Vicki Mabry; Brookwood Medical Center, Montclair Baptist Hospital,
Birmingham, Ala: Eric D. Cohen, MD, Larry Maske;
Cardiology Foundation of Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood,
Pa: Timothy Shapiro, MD, Ann Marie Chikowski; Crozer Chester
Medical Center, Upland, Pa: Ancil A. Jones, MD, Susan Curry, RN;
Geisinger Medical Clinic, Danville, Pa: James Blankenship,
MD, Lee Demko; Hackensack Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ: Pranay
Vaidya, MD, Sarah Timmapuri, MD; High Point Regional Hospital, High
Point, NC: H. Barrett Cheek, MD, Karen Resh; Hospital of the Good
Samaritan, Los Angeles, Calif: Thomas L. Shook, MD, Beverly Firth;
Huntington Memorial, Pasadena, Calif: Paul Maher, MD, Donna Lynn
Ujllge; Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY: Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, Nancy
Cohn; Long Beach Memorial Hospital, Long Beach, Calif: Rex Winters, MD,
Kathy Lee; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC: Bruce
Usher, MD, Michael Miller, MD, Betty Owens; Mercy General and Sutter
Memorial Hospitals, Sacramento, Calif: David Roberts, MD, Lucy Lindsey;
Mercy Hospital Medical Center Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines, Iowa: Mark
Tannenbaum, MD, Dawn Stangl; Heart and Vascular Institute, Ypsilanti,
Mich: James Bengston, MD, Mary Adolphson; Midwest Heart Research,
Lombard, Ill: Lawrence Barr, MD, Peter M. Kerwin, MD, Elaine Enger, Ann
Burns; Milwaukee Cardiovascular Research
Foundation, Milwaukee, Wis: Anita Arnold, MD, Tim
Sommers; North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY: Stanley Katz,
MD, Patrice Hilepo; Washington University Medical Center, St Louis, Mo:
John M. LaSala, MD, Kim Myers, Amy Campbell; Presbyterian Health Care
Center, Albuquerque, NM: Harvey J. White, MD, Roann Sexon; Providence
Medical Center, Seattle, Wash: Fredric M. Tobis, MD, Manau Blennan, RN;
Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio: Barry S. George, MD,
Denise Smith, Christine Gilliland; St Joseph's Hospital, Savannah, Ga:
Philip C. Gainey, MD, Sandra Arsenault; St Louis University Hospital,
St Louis, Mo: Frank V. Aguirre, MD, Carol Meechem; St Patrick Hospital
Western Montana Clinic, Missoula, Mont: Mark Sanz, MD, Dale Mayer;
Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Wash: R. Jeffrey Westcott, MD, Verna
Harms, RN; The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio: Dean Kereiakes, MD,
David Lausten; The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio: Eric
Topol, MD, Sorin Brener, MD, Susan Hejl, RN; University of California
at Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif: Gary Gershony, MD, Katie
Pittenger; Medical Center of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nev: Harry
Thomas, Jr, MD, Yvette Seaton, RN; University of California at San
Francisco Moffitt Hospital: Christopher Wolfe, MD, Cindi Klinski, RN;
University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Mass: Bonnie
Weiner, MD, Marie Borbone; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
Presbyterian University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa: Jeb Burchenal, MD,
Kathy Jacobs, RN; University of Washington Division of
Cardiology, Seattle, Wash: Douglas K. Stewart, MD,
Renee Devine.
![]()
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Centocor, Malvern, Pa, and Eli Lilly
and Company, Indianapolis, Ind. The authors wish to thank Ruth Cannata,
RN, the study coordinator, and Shelly K. Sapp, MS, for assistance with
statistical analysis.
![]()
Footnotes
1 The Appendix lists all investigators and coordinators. ![]()
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix 1
References
1.
Pope CF, Ezekowitz MD, Smith EO, Rapoport S,
Glickman M, Sostman HD, Zaret BL. Detection of platelet deposition
at the site of peripheral balloon angioplasty using
indium-111 platelet scintigraphy. Am J
Cardiol. 1985;55:495497.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Montalescot Benefits for specific subpopulations in TRITON-TIMI 38 Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2009; 11(suppl_G): G18 - G24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, E. Navarese, and P. Marino Risk profile and benefits from Gp IIb-IIIa inhibitors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2705 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Le May, G. A. Wells, C. A. Glover, D. Y. So, M. Froeschl, J.-F. Marquis, E. R. O'Brien, M. Turek, A. Thomas, M. Kass, et al. Primary Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty With and Without Eptifibatide in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Safety and Efficacy Study of Integrilin-Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ASSIST) Circ Cardiovasc Interv, August 1, 2009; 2(4): 330 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Witkowski, P. Maciejewski, W. Wasek, L. A. Malek, M. Niewada, B. Kaminski, J. Drzewiecki, M. Kosmider, J. Kubica, W. Ruzyllo, et al. Influence of different antiplatelet treatment regimens for primary percutaneous coronary intervention on all-cause mortality Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2009; 30(14): 1736 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Guagliumi Emerging data and decision for optimizing STEMI management: the European perspective Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2009; 11(suppl_C): C19 - C24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Brener The benefits of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: drug-specific or class effect? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2009; 53(18): 1674 - 1676. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca Adjunctive antithrombotic therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2008; 10(suppl_J): J2 - J14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, K. Schindler, J. Friedenberger, I. Eitel, G. Furnau, E. Grebe, S. Erbs, A. Linke, S. Mobius-Winkler, D. Kivelitz, et al. Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Randomized Leipzig Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Abciximab IV Versus IC in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial Circulation, July 1, 2008; 118(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Moliterno and K. M. Ziada The safety and efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for primary angioplasty: more options to choose and more time to decide. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 536 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Menichelli, A. Parma, E. Pucci, R. Fiorilli, F. De Felice, M. Nazzaro, A. Giulivi, D. Alborino, A. Azzellino, and R. Violini Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SESAMI) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 15, 2007; 49(19): 1924 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maioli, F. Bellandi, M. Leoncini, A. Toso, and R. P. Dabizzi Randomized Early Versus Late Abciximab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Coronary Intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Raveendran, H. H. Ting, P. J. Best, D. R. Holmes Jr, R. J. Lennon, M. Singh, M. R. Bell, K. H. Long, and C. S. Rihal Eptifibatide vs Abciximab as Adjunctive Therapy During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2007; 82(2): 196 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Dzau, E. M. Antman, H. R. Black, D. L. Hayes, J. E. Manson, J. Plutzky, J. J. Popma, and W. Stevenson The Cardiovascular Disease Continuum Validated: Clinical Evidence of Improved Patient Outcomes: Part II: Clinical Trial Evidence (Acute Coronary Syndromes Through Renal Disease) and Future Directions Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2871 - 2891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Saw, D. L. Bhatt, D. J. Moliterno, S. J. Brener, S. R. Steinhubl, A. M. Lincoff, J. E. Tcheng, R. A. Harrington, M. Simoons, T. Hu, et al. The Influence of Peripheral Arterial Disease on Outcomes: A Pooled Analysis of Mortality in Eight Large Randomized Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1567 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Heer, U Zeymer, C Juenger, A K Gitt, H Wienbergen, R Zahn, M Gottwik, J Senges, and for the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) Registry I Beneficial effects of abciximab in patients with primary percutaneous intervention for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1484 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 216 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, T. E. Feldman, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, M. J. Kern, S. B. King III, D. A. Morrison, W. W. O'Neill, H. V. Schaff, P. L. Whitlow, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 156 - 175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The ADMIRAL Investigators Three-year duration of benefit from abciximab in patients receiving stents for acute myocardial infarction in the randomized double-blind ADMIRAL study Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2005; 26(23): 2520 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Huber, R. D. Caterina, S. D. Kristensen, F. W.A. Verheugt, G. Montalescot, L. B. Maestro, F. V. d. Werf, and for the Task Force on Pre-hospital Reperfusion The Pre-hospital reperfusion therapy: a strategy to improve therapeutic outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 2063 - 2074. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferenc and F.-J. Neumann Efficacy of primary PCI: the microvessel perspective Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I4 - I9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Beygui and G. Montalescot The use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors into new perspectives: pre-catheterization laboratory administration Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I10 - I14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Migliorini and D. Antoniucci Patient selection bias in primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials: a critical issue Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I21 - I26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Danzi, L. Mauri, and F. Sozzi Percutaneous coronary intervention and beyond for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_K): K26 - K30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, R. Grimaldi, and M. Chiariello Coronary stenting and abciximab in primary angioplasty for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction QJM, September 1, 2005; 98(9): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, G. W. Stone, D. Antoniucci, J. E. Tcheng, F.-J. Neumann, F. Van de Werf, E. M. Antman, and E. J. Topol Abciximab as Adjunctive Therapy to Reperfusion in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials JAMA, April 13, 2005; 293(14): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Brophy and L. Joseph Medical Decision Making with Incomplete Evidence--Choosing a Platelet Glycoprotein IIbIIIa Receptor Inhibitor for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Med Decis Making, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 222 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gyongyosi, H. Domanovits, W. Benzer, M. Haugk, B. Heinisch, G. Sodeck, R. Hodl, G. Gaul, G. Bonner, J. Wojta, et al. Use of abciximab prior to primary angioplasty in STEMI results in early recanalization of the infarct-related artery and improved myocardial tissue reperfusion - results of the Austrian multi-centre randomized ReoPro-BRIDGING Study Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2125 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ndrepepa, A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, C. Schmitt, J. Mehilli, and A. Schomig Five-year outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in a randomised trial assessing the value of abciximab during coronary artery stenting Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1635 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goto, N. Tamura, and H. Ishida Ability of anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to dissolve platelet thrombi formed on a collagen surface under blood flow conditions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Simon and M. Sakuma Platelet disaggregation: Putting time on your side in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 324 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Montalescot, M. Borentain, L. Payot, J. P. Collet, and D. Thomas Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis JAMA, July 21, 2004; 292(3): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, C.-H. Yang, H.-W. Chang, S.-M. Chen, W.-C. Hung, and C.-L. Hang Delayed Post-Myocardial Infarction Invasive Measures, Helpful or Harmful?: A Subgroup Analysis Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 38 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman Summary of recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 676 - 677. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): e37 - e37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Antman and F. Van de Werf Pharmacoinvasive Therapy: The Future of Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2480 - 2486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Antoniucci, A. Migliorini, G. Parodi, R. Valenti, A. Rodriguez, A. Hempel, G. Memisha, and G. M. Santoro Abciximab-Supported Infarct Artery Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Survival: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing Infarct Artery Stenting Plus Abciximab With Stenting Alone Circulation, April 13, 2004; 109(14): 1704 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M W H Behan and R F Storey Antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2004; 80(941): 155 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kunichika, O. Ben-Yehuda, S. Lafitte, N. Kunichika, B. Peters, and A. N. DeMaria Effects of glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion: A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Patrono, F. Bachmann, C. Baigent, C. Bode, R. De Caterina, B. Charbonnier, D. Fitzgerald, J. Hirsh, S. Husted, J. Kvasnicka, et al. Expert Consensus Document on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents: The Task Force on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2004; 25(2): 166 - 181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Melandri The Obsession With Primary Angioplasty Circulation, December 9, 2003; 108 (23): e162 - e162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Topol, F.-J. Neumann, and G. Montalescot A preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1886 - 1889. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Mehta, K. J. Harjai, D. Cox, G. W. Stone, B. Brodie, J. Boura, W. O'Neill, C. L. Grines, and Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1739 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dangas Interventional therapy for acute myocardial infarction: respect the microvasculature J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1403 - 1405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dalby, A. Bouzamondo, P. Lechat, and G. Montalescot Transfer for Primary Angioplasty Versus Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1809 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P Dobesh, S. L Lanfear, J. R Abu-Shanab, J. E Lakamp, S. Gowda, and M. Y Haikal Outcomes with Changes in Prescribing of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in PCI Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2003; 37(10): 1375 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Tcheng, D. E. Kandzari, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, M. B. Effron, E. Garcia, J. J. Griffin, G. Guagliumi, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, et al. Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1316 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, H.-W. Chang, Y.-K. Hsieh, C.-Y. Fang, S.-M. Chen, and M.-C. Chen Impact of Tirofiban on Angiographic Morphologic Features of High-Burden Thrombus Formation During Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Short-term Outcomes Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 962 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Eisenberg and S. Jamal Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Crouch, J. M Nappi, and K. I Cheang Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Acute Coronary Syndrome Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2003; 37(6): 860 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Brener, S. G. Ellis, J. Schneider, C. Apperson-Hansen, and E. J. Topol Abciximab-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term survival--a prospective single-center registry Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2003; 24(7): 630 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, M.-C. Chen, C.-J. Wu, H.-W. Chang, T.-H. Yu, K.-H. Yeh, and M. Fu Acute Myocardial Infarction With Simultaneous ST-Segment Elevation in the Precordial and Inferior Leads: Evaluation of Anatomic Lesions and Clinical Implications Chest, April 1, 2003; 123(4): 1170 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Lee, N. A. Herity, B. L. Hiatt, W. F. Fearon, M. Rezaee, A. J. Carter, M. Huston, D. Schreiber, P. M. DiBattiste, and A. C. Yeung Adjunctive Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibition With Tirofiban Before Primary Angioplasty Improves Angiographic Outcomes: Results of the TIrofiban Given in the Emergency Room before Primary Angioplasty (TIGER-PA) Pilot Trial Circulation, March 25, 2003; 107(11): 1497 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Moliterno and A. W. Chan Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in early intent-to-stent treatment of acute coronary syndromes: EPISTENT, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC, and TARGET J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4_Suppl_S): 49S - 54S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardi, F. Van de Werf, D. Ardissino, A. Betriu, D. V. Cokkinos, E. Falk, K. A.A. Fox, D. Julian, M. Lengyel, F.-J. Neumann, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 28 - 66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.S Petronio, D Rovai, G Musumeci, R Baglini, C Nardi, U Limbruno, C Palagi, D Volterrani, and M Mariani Effects of abciximab on microvascular integrity and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with acute infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 67 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Lenderink, E Boersma, C Heeschen, A Vahanian, M.-J de Boer, V Umans, M.J.B.M van den Brand, C.W Hamm, M.L Simoons, and for the CAPTURE investigators Elevated troponin T and C-reactive protein predict impaired outcome for 4 years in patients with refractory unstable angina, and troponin T predicts benefit of treatment with abciximab in combination with PTCA Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 77 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Karvouni, D. G. Katritsis, and J. P. A. Ioannidis Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists reduce mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 26 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, M. Fu, K.-H. Yeh, T.-H. Yu, W.-C. Hung, and M.-C. Chen Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Resulting From Left Circumflex Artery Occlusion Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 2068 - 2074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Lincoff, R. M. Califf, F. Van de Werf, J. T. Willerson, H. D. White, P. W. Armstrong, V. Guetta, W. B. Gibler, J. S. Hochman, C. Bode, et al. Mortality at 1 Year With Combination Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition and Reduced-Dose Fibrinolytic Therapy vs Conventional Fibrinolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: GUSTO V Randomized Trial JAMA, November 6, 2002; 288(17): 2130 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, M.-C. Chen, H.-W. Chang, C.-L. Hang, Y.-K. Hsieh, C.-Y. Fang, and C.-J. Wu Angiographic Morphologic Features of Infarct-Related Arteries and Timely Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Predictors of Slow-Flow and No-Reflow Phenomenon Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1322 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ribichini and W. Wijns ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: REPERFUSION TREATMENT Heart, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 298 - 305. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ronner, E. Boersma, G.-J. Laarman, G. A. Somsen, R. A. Harrington, J. W. Deckers, E. J. Topol, R. M. Califf, and M. L. Simoons Early angioplasty in acute coronary syndromes without persistent st-segment elevation improves outcome but increases the need for six-month repeat revascularization: An analysis of the pursuit trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1924 - 1929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Constantinides, T S N Lo, M Been, and M F Shiu Early experience with a helical coronary thrombectomy device in patients with acute coronary thrombosis. Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 455 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, J. J. Griffin, G. Guagliumi, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, J. D. Carroll, et al. Comparison of Angioplasty with Stenting, with or without Abciximab, in Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., March 28, 2002; 346(13): 957 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.Ph. Collet, G. Montalescot, C. Lesty, and J.W. Weisel A Structural and Dynamic Investigation of the Facilitating Effect of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Dissolving Platelet-Rich Clots Circ. Res., March 8, 2002; 90(4): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.W.G. Leebeek, E. Boersma, C.P. Cannon, F.J.J. van de Werf, and M.L. Simoons Oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular disease: why were the results so unfavourable Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2002; 23(6): 444 - 457. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Rezkalla and R. A. Kloner No-Reflow Phenomenon Circulation, February 5, 2002; 105(5): 656 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, J. Dirschinger, J. Pache, M. Seyfarth, R. Blasini, D. Hall, F.-J. Neumann, and A. Schomig Sex-Based Analysis of Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated Predominantly With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 210 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R Kalra Has abciximab's ship come in?: Results from the ADMIRAL investigators and diabetic substudy The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, January 1, 2002; 2(1): 30 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Batchelor, K. W. Mahaffey, P. B. Berger, E. Deutsch, S. Meier, V. Hasselblad, E. T. Fry, P. S. Teirstein, A. M. Ross, C. A. Binanay, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of enoxaparin after high-risk coronary stenting: the ATLAST trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1608 - 1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Vakili, R. Kaplan, and D. L. Brown Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State Circulation, October 30, 2001; 104(18): 2171 - 2176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Hanratty, M. Ward, D. P. Chew, D. L. Bhatt, A. M. Lincoff, D. J. Moliterno, S. J. Brener, K. E. Wolski, and E. J. Topol Optimal Activated Clotting Time During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Response Circulation, October 9, 2001; 104 (15): e83 - e84. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, M.-C. Chen, H.-W. Chang, K. Y.-K. Hsieh, C.-L. Hang, and M. Fu Effect of Primary Angioplasty on Total or Subtotal Left Main Occlusion : Analysis of Incidence, Clinical Features, Outcomes, and Prognostic Determinants Chest, October 1, 2001; 120(4): 1212 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G MANOHARAN and A A J ADGEY Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and acute coronary syndromes: summary report of the full submission to NICE, and beyond Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 259 - 261. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, L. Bossaert, G. Breithardt, P. Brugada, A.J. Camm, R. Cappato, S.M. Cobbe, C. Di Mario, et al. Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1374 - 1450. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Montalescot, P. Barragan, O. Wittenberg, P. Ecollan, S. Elhadad, P. Villain, J.-M. Boulenc, M.-C. Morice, L. Maillard, M. Pansieri, et al. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition with Coronary Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., June 21, 2001; 344(25): 1895 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Anderson, R. M. Califf, G. W. Stone, F.-J. Neumann, G. Montalescot, D. P. Miller, J. J. Ferguson III, J. T. Willerson, H. F. Weisman, and E. J. Topol Long-term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2059 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Bashore, E. R. Bates, P. B. Berger, D. A. Clark, J. T. Cusma, G. J. Dehmer, M. J. Kern, W. K. Laskey, M. P. O'Laughlin, S. Oesterle, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents endorsed by the American Heart Association and the Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the AHA J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2170 - 2214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zahn, R. Schiele, S. Schneider, A. K. Gitt, H. Wienbergen, K. Seidl, T. Voigtlander, M. Gottwik, G. Berg, E. Altmann, et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty?: Results from the pooled data of the maximal individual therapy in acute myocardial infarction registry and the myocardial infarction registry J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zijlstra CORONARY DISEASE: Acute myocardial infarction: primary angioplasty Heart, June 1, 2001; 85(6): 705 - 709. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Van de Werf New aspects of pharmacological reperfusion: from macro- to microlysis Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2001; 3(suppl_C): C62 - C68. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Braunwald Foreword Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2001; 3(suppl_A): A1 - A2. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Montalescot, R. Choussat, and J.P. Collet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors and primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2001; 3(suppl_A): A3 - A7. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.C. Herrmann, R.H. Li, and E.M. Ohman Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the SPEED trial Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2001; 3(suppl_A): A26 - A34. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Le May, M. Labinaz, R. F. Davies, J.-F. Marquis, L. A. Laramee, E. R. O'Brien, W. L. Williams, R. S. Beanlands, G. Nichol, and L. A. Higginson Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 985 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Kaul, R. Sapra, B. Singh, D. Sudan, T. Ghose, N. S. Dixit, and H. S. Wasir Abciximab During Rescue Angioplasty After Failed Thrombolysis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2001; 9(1): 31 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Chew, D. L. Bhatt, A. M. Lincoff, D. J. Moliterno, S. J. Brener, K. E. Wolski, and E. J. Topol Defining the Optimal Activated Clotting Time During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : Aggregate Results From 6 Randomized, Controlled Trials Circulation, February 20, 2001; 103(7): 961 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, K.-H. Yeh, C.-L. Hang, C.-Y. Fang, K. Y.-K. Hsieh, and M. Fu Unusual Complication of Retrograde Dissection to the Coronary Sinus of Valsalva During Percutaneous Revascularization : A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 493 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Roe, E. M. Ohman, A. C. P. Maas, R. H. Christenson, K. W. Mahaffey, C. B. Granger, R. A. Harrington, R. M. Califf, and M. W. Krucoff Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 9 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Collet, G. Montalescot, C. Lesty, J. Soria, Z. Mishal, D. Thomas, and C. Soria Disaggregation of In Vitro Preformed Platelet-Rich Clots by Abciximab Increases Fibrin Exposure and Promotes Fibrinolysis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Cairns, P. Theroux, H. D. Lewis Jr., M. Ezekowitz, and T. W. Meade Antithrombotic Agents in Coronary Artery Disease Chest, January 1, 2001; 119 (2009): 228S - 252S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Lincoff, D. B. Mark, J. E. Tcheng, R. M. Califf, M. V. Bala, K. M. Anderson, L. Davidson-Ray, J. D. Knight, C. F. Cabot, and E. J. Topol Economic Assessment of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade With Abciximab and Low-Dose Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization : Results From the EPILOG Randomized Trial Circulation, December 12, 2000; 102(24): 2923 - 2929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Chew and D. J. Moliterno A critical appraisal of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2028 - 2035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |