(Circulation. 1999;99:73-80.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany (A.G., P.E.); Behringwerke AG, Clinical Research Intensive Care, Marburg, Germany (H.V.); Department of Medicine I, RWTH, Aachen, Germany (U.J.); Department of Internal Medicine, William-Harvey Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany (V.H.-W.); Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany (B.K.-M.); Centeon Pharma GmbH & Co, Biometry, Marburg, Germany (H.G.M.-V.); and Department for Haemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Kerckhoff-Clinic, Bad Nauheim, Germany (B.P.)
Correspondence to Prof Dr A. Greinacher, MD, Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Sauerbruchstr./Diagnostikzentrum, 17487 Greifswald, Germany. E-mail greinach{at}rz.uni-greifswald.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsEighty-two patients in this prospective,
multicenter study received 1 of 4 intravenous r-hirudin
regimens: A1, HIT patients with thrombosis (n=51), 0.4-mg/kg bolus and
then 0.15 mg · kg-1 · h-1; A2,
HIT patients with thrombosis receiving thrombolysis
(n=5), 0.2-mg/kg bolus and then 0.1 mg · kg-1
· h-1; B, HIT patients without thrombosis (n=18), 0.1
mg · kg-1 · h-1; and C, during
cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (n=8), 0.25-mg/kg bolus and then
5-mg boluses as needed. Response criteria were increase in platelet
count by
30% to >109/L and activated
partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 1.5 to 3.0 times baseline
values achieved with a maximum of 2 dose increases. No placebo control
was used for ethical reasons. Outcomes of a subset of
r-hirudintreated patients who met predefined inclusion criteria
(n=71) were compared with those of a historical control group (n=120)
for combined and individual incidences of death, amputations, new
thromboembolic complications, and incidences of bleeding. Platelet
counts increased rapidly in 88.7% of r-hirudintreated patients with
acute HIT. In regimens A1 and A2, the 25% and 75% quartiles of the
aPTT were within the target range at all but 1 time point. The
incidence of the combined end point (death, amputation, new
thromboembolic complications) was significantly reduced in r-hirudin
patients compared with historical control patients
(P=0.014). During first selected treatment, the adjusted
hazard ratio for r-hirudin patients versus historical control was 0.279
(95% CI, 0.112 to 0.699; P=0.003). Bleeding rates were
similar in both groups.
Conclusionsr-Hirudin treatment is associated with a rapid and sustained recovery of platelet counts, sufficient aPTT prolongations, and true clinical benefits for patients with HIT.
Key Words: heparin platelets thrombosis trials anticoagulants immunology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When continued anticoagulation is necessary, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), heparinoid danaparoid sodium,14 ancrod,15 and several other drugs have been used with various degrees of success. LMWH demonstrates in vitro cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies in >90% of cases.8 16 17 Danaparoid sodium is often used on a compassionate-use basis14 ; however, it also has limitations: in vitro cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies is observed in 10% to 20% of cases,17 it has a relatively long half-life (t1/2 of antifactor Xa activity of 24 hours), monitoring is required during high-dose treatment to determine antifactor Xa activity, and no antidote is available. Argatroban, a synthetic thrombin inhibitor, is under investigation for its utility in anticoagulation in HIT patients.18
Hirudin, an antithrombotic substance produced by the salivary glands of the medicinal leech (Hirudo medicinalis),19 is the most potent and specific thrombin inhibitor currently known. It acts independently of cofactors such as antithrombin, and unlike heparin, it is not inactivated by PF4. Moreover, unlike heparin, hirudin can inhibit thrombin bound within the clot.20 These properties may be especially important in HIT, a clinical condition associated with increased platelet activation,13 21 release of large amounts of PF4, thrombin generation, and acute thrombotic events.
The goals of this first major prospective study of HIT patients were to assess the efficacy of recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) as a new therapeutic approach in HIT and to evaluate its effectiveness relative to other available therapeutic options. Because of the high risk of limb amputations (10% to 20%) and death (20% to 30%) in patients with HIT and complicating thrombosis,22 23 placebo treatment is considered unethical. Also, at the time of this study, no approved alternative for treatment of HIT was available to serve as an active comparator. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to determine how the clinical outcomes of r-hirudintreated patients compared with those of a historical control group, ie, patients with HIT who had been treated with the best possible care before r-hirudin was available.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years of age
and to have a definite need for parenteral antithrombotic therapy or
prophylaxis. Patients were excluded if they required hemodialysis or
hemofiltration because of severe renal insufficiency, were anticipated
to comply poorly, had a known hypersensitivity to r-hirudin, or were
pregnant. Each patient provided informed consent to participate in
the trial.
Study Design and Treatment Schedules
In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with HIT were
treated with 1 of 4 r-hirudin (Lepirudin, Behringwerke AG) regimens:
A1, HIT patients with thrombosis, 0.4-mg/kg bolus and then 0.15 mg
· kg-1 · h-1;
A2, HIT patients with thrombosis receiving
thrombolysis, 0.2-mg/kg bolus and then 0.1 mg ·
kg-1 · h-1; B, HIT
patients without thrombosis, 0.1- mg ·
kg-1 · h-1; and C,
during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, 0.25-mg/kg bolus and
then 5-mg boluses when hirudin concentration was <2500 ng/mL as
determined by ecarin clotting time.24 The start of
treatment was defined as day 1. Scheduled treatment duration was 2 to
10 days; treatment could be prolonged if clinically indicated.
Conversion to oral anticoagulants began with 6 mg/d phenprocoumon until
the international normalized ratio was 2. r-Hirudin was then reduced by
50% and stopped when the international normalized ratio reached 2.5.
After r-hirudin was stopped, the patient's clinical course was
followed for an additional 2 weeks.
This study was conducted in accordance with the good clinical practice guidelines of the European Community and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the Medical Councils of the States of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Laboratory Methods
Hemoglobin, platelet count, serum creatinine,
and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were measured
daily. HIT antibodies were determined by use of the heparin-induced
platelet activation test17 25 ; r-hirudin plasma levels
were measured with ELISA methodology.
Response Criteria
r-Hirudin therapy was monitored by aPTT with a target range of
1.5- to 3.0-fold prolongation (based on the use of Actin FS or
Neothromtin reagents; with other reagents, aPTT target range is 1.5- to
2.5-fold prolongation) of baseline values (the median normal aPTT value
of the laboratory was taken if the patient's aPTT was prolonged by
heparin treatment), with a maximum of 2 dose adjustments for low aPTT
values. Additionally, response in patients with thrombocytopenia was an
increase in platelet counts
30% of the nadir value to
>109/L on day 10, and in patients without
thrombocytopenia, response was a platelet count >109/L
on both days 3 and 10. During cardiopulmonary bypass (regimen
C), r-hirudin was monitored by use of ecarin clotting
time.24
Comparison With Historical Control Group
Clinical outcomes were compared with those of a historical
control group for combined and individual incidences of death, limb
amputations, new TECs, and incidences of bleeding. Patients in the
historical control had confirmed HIT (heparin-induced platelet
activation test) between 1989 and 1993 and had been treated with the
best available care. To ensure comparability between groups, exclusion
criteria were prospectively defined and applied to both the historical
control and r-hirudintreated patients. These criteria were age <18
years, missing date of HIT confirmation, time between onset of clinical
symptoms and laboratory confirmation of HIT >21 days, and
cardiopulmonary bypass. Outcomes were measured for each group
across 2 time intervals: (1) from the day of laboratory confirmation of
HIT until the end of the observation period and (2) during the
time of the first selected active treatment administered within 2 days
of laboratory confirmation of HIT in historical control patients.
Statistical Analysis
aPTT prolongation and platelet count recovery were measured
in patients who received r-hirudin for
2 days. Incidences of death,
limb amputations, and new TECs were monitored for all patients.
Comparisons were conducted by use of a Kaplan-Meier time-to-event
analysis,26 beginning with events occurring on the
day of laboratory confirmation of HIT for the r-hirudintreated group,
and 1 day after laboratory confirmation for the historical control
group (conservative assessment). Results were compared using the
log-rank test.26 To adjust for potential prognostic
factors (sex, age, underlying disease, time between onset of clinical
symptoms and laboratory confirmation of HIT, TECs during
heparin/heparinoid treatment), r-hirudin and historical
control patients were compared by use of a likelihood ratio test based
on a Cox regression model with 95% CIs for the hazard
ratio.27 28
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Sixty-six patients (75.6%) were classified as acute HIT patients, with
a decrease in platelet counts >30% or <100 G/L during recent
heparin therapy. Sixteen patients with a history of confirmed HIT were
classified as "latent" HIT patients. In 55 of 62 (88.7%) patients
with acute HIT and evaluable platelet counts, platelet counts
increased to >109/L within 10 days (Figure 1
). Median platelet count remained
nearly constant in patients with normal platelet counts at baseline
(data not shown).
|
In regimens A1, A2, and B, aPTT increased rapidly to between 1.5 and 3.0 times baseline values. The 25% and 75% quartiles of the aPTT were within this target range at all time points in treatment regimen A1 and at all but 1 time point in regimen A2. Median aPTT prolongations in regimen B were slightly lower than those in the other 2 groups.
Incidences of death, limb amputations, new TECs, and major bleedings
are summarized in Table 2
. Six patients
died (3 in group A1 and 3 in group B); causes of death were heart
failure (n=3), sepsis (n=2), and multiorgan failure (n=1). All fatal
events were judged to be due to the severity of the underlying disease
and not to the use of study drug. New TECs observed during the study
were arterial-peripheral (n=4),
pulmonary embolism (n=2), venous-proximal (n=1), and
venous-proximal in addition to venous-distal (n=2). Only 2 new TECs
occurred during r-hirudin treatment, both of which were occlusions of a
peripheral arterial bypass.
|
During the study, 27 patients (32.9%) experienced at least 1 bleeding event (regimen A1, 33.3%; A2, 20.0%; B, 33.3%; and C, 37.5%). Eleven patients (13.4%) experienced 15 major bleeding events (8 bleedings at invasive sites, 7 spontaneous bleedings: urogenital (n=2), into a liver cyst with concomitant thrombolysis, soft tissue, gastrointestinal, into phenprocoumon-induced necroses, and diffuse bleeding). Incidence of major bleeding in the highest-dose group, A1 (7 of 51 patients, 13.7%), was comparable to that of the remaining treatment regimens (4 of 31 patients, 12.9%). Some patients experienced minor bleeding (n=27), isolated drop in hemoglobin (n=7), hematuria (n=5), hematoma at a puncture site (n=4), or hematoma (n=4).
Except for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, there were no significant differences in hemoglobin values between baseline and the last measurement during r-hirudin treatment. No clinically relevant changes in serum creatinine were observed. Median hirudin plasma levels ranged between 1149 and 1698 ng/mL in regimen A1 and between 874 and 1256 ng/mL in regimen B, comparable to other studies.29 30 31 32
Comparison With the Historical Control Group
Eleven of the 82 r-hirudin patients were excluded from comparisons
with the historical control group for not meeting the prospectively
defined exclusion criteria: cardiopulmonary bypass (n=8), time
between onset of clinical symptoms and laboratory confirmation of HIT
>21 days (n=2), and date of HIT confirmation missing (n=1). Thus, 71
r-hirudin patients were compared with 120 eligible patients in the
historical control group for combined and individual incidences of
death, limb amputations, new TECs, and incidences of bleeding. Patient
characteristics of each group at baseline are summarized in Table 3
. Patients in the r-hirudin group were,
on average, 7 years younger than historical control patients, but more
patients in the r-hirudin group had multiple TECs before the start of
treatment. Cumulative incidences of the combined and individual events
of interest (deaths, limb amputations, new TECs) are shown in Figure 2
, and individual end points at days 7
and 35 are listed in Table 4
. The
log-rank test indicated a significant difference in favor of the
r-hirudintreated patient group (P=0.014). The unadjusted
hazard ratio (r-hirudin to historical control) was 0.525 (95% CI,
0.310 to 0.889); after adjustment for prespecified prognostic factors
(Table 3
), the hazard ratio was 0.508 (95% CI, 0.290 to 0.892;
P=0.014).
|
|
|
In addition, the combined cumulative incidences of only limb
amputations and deaths in the 2 patient groups were
consistently lower in the r-hirudin group than in the
historical control group (P=0.043, log-rank test; Table 4
). There was a slightly higher bleeding rate in the r-hirudin
group (Table 5
).
|
For comparison of outcomes with only the first selected treatment of the historical control patients, incomplete data precluded treatment assignation to 17 of the 120 patients. Mean duration of treatment for the remaining 103 historical control patients was 14.9±15.8 days (mean±SD), comparable to that of the 71 r-hirudin patients (14.0±9.9 days). For historical control patients, the mean treatment durations were as follows: danaparoid sodium, 23.0±22.0 days (n=32); ongoing phenprocoumon, 14.3±12.3 days (n=22); no anticoagulation, 10.4±9.7 days (n=23); and miscellaneous, 9.5±8.5 days (n=26). Miscellaneous first selected treatments were ongoing LMWH (n=6), phenprocoumon (n=5), ongoing danaparoid sodium (n=4), ongoing aspirin (n=3), LMWH (n=2), aspirin (n=2), thrombolytics (n=2), and ongoing thrombolytics (n=2).
Two patients in the historical control group and 1 patient in the
r-hirudin group were excluded from the combined end-point
analysis and analysis of new TECs because the time to
event was not evaluable. Two additional patients in the historical
control group were excluded because treatment duration was only 1 day.
Thus, the analysis was based on 99 historical control patients
and 70 r-hirudintreated patients. Cumulative incidences of the
combined end point (death, limb amputations, new TECs) in the first
selected treatment comparison are shown in Figure 3
. Incidence was consistently
higher in the historical control group across all time points (9.1%
versus 32.8% by day 14; P<0.001, log-rank test), even
after adjustment for the prespecified prognostic factors in a Cox
regression analysis (P=0.003). The estimated
adjusted hazard ratio (r-hirudin to historical control) was 0.279 (95%
CI, 0.112 to 0.699). Cumulative incidences of death (P=0.02)
and new TECs (P=0.006) during treatment were significantly
lower in the r-hirudin group than in the historical control group.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sequelae of acute HIT can be severe. Six patients with HIT in this study died (no death was associated with bleeding complications from the use of r-hirudin). Three patients (3.7%) underwent limb amputation, 2 of whom were treated with r-hirudin for perioperative (limb amputation) anticoagulation. Only 2 of 9 new TECs occurred during r-hirudin treatment; indeed, most new TECs occurred after cessation of r-hirudin treatment, despite the cessation of heparin and the normalization of platelet counts. Even oral anticoagulation could not completely prevent new TECs. This suggests that HIT antibodies may be cross-reacting with endogenous heparin-PF4 complexes,7 as we have been able to absorb and elute HIT antibodies from endothelial cells in vitro.9
Because neither a placebo-controlled nor a randomized study could be performed for ethical and formal reasons, we compared the outcome of r-hirudintreated patients with a historical control group treated with the best care available before r-hirudin. Despite moderate differences in clinical status at baseline between the 2 groups, we could not identify any bias in the selection of historical control patients from the registry. When the cumulative incidences of death, limb amputations, and new TECs after HIT confirmation were compared, patients in the r-hirudintreated group had significantly better outcomes (25.4% versus 52.1% in the historical control 5 weeks after HIT confirmation; P=0.014). Even after exclusion of TECs, which are subject to potential misclassification errors, the incidence of the combined end point of limb amputations and deaths was consistently lower in the r-hirudin group than in the historical control group.
Patients with HIT are often severely ill, and the underlying diseases might contribute to complications in the follow-up period. We therefore compared event rates in patients during r-hirudin treatment with event rates in historical control patients during the first selected treatment after HIT confirmation. Patients' risk of experiencing potential HIT-related adverse events was reduced by 72% (P<0.001) during r-hirudin treatment.
Hemorrhage has been associated with r-hirudin treatment in other clinical studies.29 34 35 In the present study, no intracerebral or fatal hemorrhages were observed. In most cases, major bleeding occurred as a perioperative or postoperative complication. Bleeding complications were not correlated with r-hirudin plasma levels. Furthermore, the incidence of bleeding in the r-hirudin group was not statistically different from that in the historical control group. To prevent bleeding complications, renal function should be monitored carefully during r-hirudin treatment, because renal elimination is >90%. Severe hemorrhages have been observed in patients with acute HIT and renal failure who had a concomitant uremic platelet function defect.36
In conclusion, this first prospective study with r-hirudin in patients with confirmed HIT has shown r-hirudin to be an effective and safe anticoagulant, yielding significant aPTT prolongations. r-Hirudin did not cross-react with heparin-induced antibodies, as evidenced by rapid and sustained platelet recovery. Furthermore, this study provides clear evidence that treatment with r-hirudin results in true clinical benefits for patients suffering from HIT. Comparison of health outcomes of r-hirudintreated patients with those of historical control patients with confirmed HIT revealed a marked reduction in the combined incidence of death, limb amputations, and new TECs. Finally, r-hirudin enables parenteral anticoagulation despite the presence of HIT antibodies, providing life-saving treatment for severely ill patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coordinator of Cardiopulmonary Bypass
B. Pötzsch, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Investigators
A. Arnold, BG Unfallklinik, Frankfurt; H. Assmann,
Diakonissenanstalt, Flensburg; R. Belz, Städtische Klinik,
Kassel; H.-C. Benöhr, Bürgerhospital, Stuttgart; G. Berg,
Universitätsklinik, Homburg a.d. Saar; D. Birnbaum, Klinikum der
Universität, Regensburg; C. Bode, Universitätsklinik,
Heidelberg; P. Braun, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Krankenhaus-Herzzentrum, Duisburg;
E. Chorianopoulos, Theresien-Krankenhaus, Mannheim; J. Cyran,
Städtisches Krankenhaus, Heilbronn; H. Ditter, Städtisches
Krankenhaus, Gütersloh; D. Ellbrück, Medizinische
Universitätsklinik, Ulm; M. Fischer, Kreiskrankenhaus,
Neustadt AR; F. Forycki, Krankenhaus Neukölln, Berlin; H. Frotz,
Marienkrankenhaus, Bergisch Gladbach; W. Gehrmann, Rotes
Kreuz-Krankenhaus, Kassel; G. Görtz, St Marienhospital,
Lünen; H. Gunold, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam; H.-J.
Gutschmidt, Städtisches Krankenhaus, Kiel; V. Hach-Wunderle,
William-Harvey-Klinik, Bad Nauheim; P. Hanrath,
Rheinisch-Westfälisch-Technische Hochschule, Aachen; L. Harms,
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin; P. Harten,
Universitätsklinik, Kiel; A. Hartmann, Universitätsklinik
Venusburg, Bonn; T. Hau, Nordwest-Krankenhaus Sanderbusch, Sande; H.
Heizmann, Klinikum der Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen; L.
Henselmann, Krankenhaus München-Neuperlach, München; D.
Hey, Krankenhaus, Bietigheim; E. Horstmann, Marienhospital, Herne;
J.-P. Jantzen, Krankenhaus Nordstadt, Hannover; W. Jung,
Universitätsklinik, Bonn; B. Kemkes-Matthes, Medizinische
Universitätskliniken, Gießen; W. Kirschke, St. Bernhard;
Krankenhaus, Kamp-Lintfort; W.-P. Kerekorn, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad
Nauheim; R. Koch, Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg; H. Kreuzer,
Universitätskliniken, Göttingen; G. Lorenz,
BG-Unfallklinik, Murnau; H. Menge, Klinikum, Remscheid; K.-L.
Neuhaus, Städtische Kliniken, Kassel; U. Nordmeyer,
Kreiskrankenhaus, Siegen; D. Opherk, Krankenhaus Bethanien, Moers; R.
Phlippen, Städtische Klinik, Duisburg; G. Ramadron,
Universitätsklinik, Göttingen; A. Rau, Städtisches,
Krankenhaus, Sindelfingen; F.-C. Rieß. Albertinen-Krankenhaus,
Hamburg; G. Rudofsky, Universitätsklinikum, Essen; W. Schmidt,
Unversitätsklinik, Kiel; H.-J. Siemens, Medizinische
Universität, Lübeck; A. Vanucci, Klinikum Barmen,
Wuppertal; and G. Zentgraf, Krankenhaus Mariahilf GmbH,
Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Contributors To Historical Control Registry
H. Breithaupt, Justus-Liebig University Gießen Smeets,
Randerath, St Bernhard-Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort.
Data Collection/Documentation
A. Eichner, Gießen; V. Schmidt, Wetzlar; J. König,
R. Mühlich, M. Nebel, S. Fleischer, and W. Dreher,
Marburg
Central Laboratories
H. J. Friesen and K. Hecker, Behringwerke AG, Marburg, and
P. Eichler University, Greifswald.
Received January 27, 1998; revision received August 29, 1998; accepted September 16, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin, A. Greinacher, A. Koster, and A. M. Lincoff Treatment and Prevention of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 340S - 380S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fugate and J. Chiappe Standardizing the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2008; 65(4): 334 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Levy, K. A. Tanaka, and J. M. Bailey Cardiac Surgical Pharmacology Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 77 - 110. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Levy, K. A. Tanaka, and M. J. Hursting Reducing Thrombotic Complications in the Perioperative Setting: An Update on Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 570 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tardy, T. Lecompte, F. Boelhen, B. Tardy-Poncet, I. Elalamy, P. Morange, Y. Gruel, M. Wolf, D. Francois, E. Racadot, et al. Predictive factors for thrombosis and major bleeding in an observational study in 181 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treated with lepirudin Blood, September 1, 2006; 108(5): 1492 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Arepally and T. L. Ortel Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia N. Engl. J. Med., August 24, 2006; 355(8): 809 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Martel, J. Lee, and P. S. Wells Risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2710 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. V Reddy, E. J Grossman, S. A Trevino, M. J Hursting, and P. T Murray Argatroban Anticoagulation in Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2005; 39(10): 1601 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-K. Jang and M. J. Hursting When Heparins Promote Thrombosis: Review of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Circulation, May 24, 2005; 111(20): 2671 - 2683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Levine Finding Haystacks Full of Needles: From Opus to Osler Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1488 - 1490. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Kelton The Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Biological Basis for Treatment Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2_suppl): 9S - 20S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hirsh, M. O'Donnell, and J. I. Weitz New anticoagulants Blood, January 15, 2005; 105(2): 453 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Gurbuz, W. G. Elliott, and A. A. Zia Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the cardiovascular patient: diagnostic and treatment guidelines Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 138 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L Stephens, J. M Koerber, J. C Mattson, and M. A Smythe Effect of Lepirudin on the International Normalized Ratio Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2005; 39(1): 28 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lubenow, P. Eichler, T. Lietz, B. Farner, and A. Greinacher Lepirudin for prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with acute isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an analysis of 3 prospective studies Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3072 - 3077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rice Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Myths and Misconceptions (That Will Cause Trouble for You and Your Patient) Arch Intern Med, October 11, 2004; 164(18): 1961 - 1964. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Smythe and A. Caffee Anticoagulation Monitoring Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2004; 17(5): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Smythe, W. E. Dager, and N. M. Patel Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2004; 17(5): 327 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin and A. Greinacher Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Recognition, Treatment, and Prevention: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 311S - 337S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E Dager, R. C Gosselin, R. Yoshikawa, and J. T Owings Lepirudin in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2004; 38(4): 598 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |