Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:1477-1484

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fareh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fareh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, G.

(Circulation. 1999;99:1477-1484.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Cellular Effects of ß-Particle Delivery on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Endothelial Cells

A Dose-Response Study

Jeannette Fareh, PhD; Rémi Martel, PhD; Pouneh Kermani, PhD; Guy Leclerc, MD

From the Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Correspondence to Guy Leclerc, MD, Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, CHUM, 1560, Sherbrooke East, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L4 M1.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Although endovascular radiotherapy inhibits neointimal hyperplasia, the exact cellular alterations induced by ß irradiation remain to be elucidated.

Methods and Results—We investigated in vitro the ability of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides to alter (1) proliferation of human and porcine vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and human coronary artery endothelial cells (ECs), (2) cell cycle progression, (3) cell viability and apoptosis, (4) cell migration, and (5) cell phenotype and morphological features. ß radiation significantly reduced proliferation of VSMCs (ED50 1.10 Gy) and ECs (ED50 2.15 Gy) in a dose-dependent manner. Exposure to ß emission interfered with cell cycle progression, with induction of G0/G1 arrest in VSMCs, without evidence of cell viability alteration, apoptosis, or ultrastructural changes. This strategy also proved to efficiently inhibit VSMC migration by 80% and induce contractile phenotype appearance, as shown by the predominance of {alpha}-actin immunostaining in ß-irradiated cells compared with control cells.

Conclusions32P-labeled oligonucleotide was highly effective in inhibiting proliferation of both VSMCs and ECs in a dose-dependent fashion, with ECs showing a higher resistance to these effects. ß irradiation–induced G1 arrest was not associated with cytotoxicity and apoptosis, thus demonstrating a potent cytostatic effect of ß-based therapy. This effect, coupled to that on VSMC migration inhibition and the appearance of a contractile phenotype, reinforced the potential of ionizing radiation to prevent neointima formation after angioplasty.


Key Words: restenosis • radiation • angioplasty • cells • endothelium • apoptosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
It is well established that restenosis after angioplasty is characterized by significant neointimal formation and geometric remodeling of the artery.1 Since the stent-based strategy is effective in preventing vessel shrinkage, excessive neointimal proliferation through the metallic prothesis continues to reduce lumen size.1 To prevent neointimal hyperplasia, various therapeutic strategies have been developed on the basis of pharmacological approaches, gene transfer,2 3 and more recently on ionizing radiation (ß- and {gamma}-emitting sources).4 5 Several animal studies with either ß particle–emitting stents6 7 8 or wire-mediated endovascular ß9 10 and {gamma} emissions10 11 12 13 have shown great promise in the field of restenosis prevention. ß-Radioactive stents allow a long-term delivery of ß particles within the arterial wall with a low dose rate, whereas endovascular brachytherapy is characterized by high dose rates over a short-term period.4 5 Although there is a great interest in developing an effective clinical endovascular radiation strategy to prevent restenosis,14 15 16 several questions pertinent to the use of such strategies remain unanswered. Indeed, the cellular consequences of ionizing radiation leading to the prevention of neointima formation after balloon angioplasty remain to be elucidated.

Accordingly, we developed a strategy combining radiotherapy and gene transfer approaches to effect an in situ delivery of pure ß particles in vascular cells in a homogeneous manner. We propose in the present study to investigate in vitro the effect of ß emission on (1) proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and endothelial cells (ECs), (2) cell cycle progression, (3) cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction, (4) cell migration, (5) vascular cell phenotype, and morphology features. We demonstrate in vitro the impact of local ß irradiation on both proliferation and migration of vascular cells in a dose-dependent manner and describe for the first time the interference of ß radiation with VSMC cell cycle progression, phenotype modulation, and absence of cytotoxic effects.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Committee for Animal Protection of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. Porcine VSMCs were isolated from aortic explants of Yorkshire Swine (Charles Rivers, St Constant, Québec, Canada) as previously described.17 Human VSMCs were harvested from unused specimens of saphenous veins obtained after bypass surgery, with informed consent of patients. Cell purity was estimated to be >95%, with the use of VSMC {alpha}-actin immunostaining (Sigma). Human coronary artery ECs (Clonetics Corp, San Diego, Calif) were grown in MCDB 131 medium (Sigma) and U937 human cells (monocyte-like leukemic tumor, ATCC, Rockville, Md) in RPMI medium.

Dosimetry for 32P-Labeled Oligonucleotides
In vitro–predicted dose was calculated considering both the specific activity of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides and the exposure time according to the dose-point-kernel (DPK) prediction. The DPK estimation, derived from the Monte Carlo method, was based on the homogeneous distribution of radioactive particles in the medium.18 On the basis of autoradiograms, ß-particle delivery was shown to be uniform in the 2-cm2 well, and no radiation was detected in adjacent wells (data not shown).

Local ß-Particle Delivery
We used 32P-labeled DNA oligonucleotides as a molecular delivery mode of ß particles to vascular cells. In the present in vitro report, the sense sequence of c-myc was used to ensure that the observed effects were not sequence specific but mainly the result of ß-particle emission. Previous studies conducted to compare sense and antisense sequences reported that the efficacy of both 32P-labeled sequences was statistically similar in inhibiting VSMC proliferation (unpublished data, 1996). Sense c-myc phosphorothioate oligonucleotides (5'-ATGCCCCTCAACGTG-3') were synthesized on a DNA/RNA automated synthesizer (Applied Biosystems) and purified according to the supplier's protocol (Glen Research). Oligonucleotides were internally labeled with [32{gamma}ATP] (3000 Ci/mmol, Du Pont Canada Inc) by T4 polynucleotide kinase (Gibco-BRL). The stability of the labeled oligomer was assessed by incubating VSMCs with the probe (0.4 nmol/L) for 1 to 7 days. Extracts were loaded on 20% urea-polyacrylamide gel and revealed by autoradiography. To determine the cellular localization of the radioactive source, VSMCs were transfected with oligomer 5'-labeled with fluorescein-isothiocyanate molecule (FITC, 2 µmol/L).

External {gamma}- and Electron-Particle Deliveries
To compare the low dose-rate strategy obtained with the use of labeled oligonucleotides to a high dose-rate approach, we exposed VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells to either 60Co (Cobalt-60) or electron beam sources, leading to {gamma}- (1.6 Gy/min) or electron-particle (4 Gy/min) deliveries, respectively (3, 10, 20, and 30 Gy).

VSMC Viability
Cell integrity was evaluated by the trypan blue exclusion test (Gibco-BRL).19 Increasing ß doses were tested (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 Gy) by incubating VSMCs with labeled-oligonucleotides for 72 hours. Cell viability assay was performed in triplicate on 4 cell preparations and expressed as a percentage of total cell counts.

Cell Proliferation Assay
VSMCs and ECs were synchronized with serum-deprived medium for 48 hours and then stimulated with FBS in the presence of increasing levels of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides (0.4 to 10 Gy). Nonirradiated cells received equal concentrations of unlabeled oligonucleotides (<20 nmol/L). After [methyl-3H]-thymidine incorporation (6.7 Ci/mmol, NEN Life Science Products), cells were treated as previously described.20 To evaluate the cell regrowth after removal of the ß source from the medium, VSMCs were first incubated with labeled oligonucleotides (5.5 Gy), leading to severe inhibition of proliferation (80%), then the ß source was removed from the cell layer for 3 and 5 days. The effects of local irradiation on proliferation was calculated as a percentage of that obtained with nonirradiated cells, on the basis of quadruplicates with 5 to 7 cell preparations. Because similar effects of labeled oligonucleotides on porcine and human VSMCs were seen (Figure 3Down), we then decided to perform all the following experiments on porcine VSMCs because porcine explants are more readily available.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Dose-response effects of ß irradiation on cell proliferation of human and porcine VSMCs (A) and ECs (human coronary artery endothelial cells) (B). Data are expressed as mean±SEM and ß doses in gray (Gy).

Cell Cycle Progression
VSMCs were synchronized in serum-deprived medium for 48 hours. Labeled oligonucleotides were simultaneously added with 10% FBS. Cells were incubated with ß sources (2, 10, and 30 Gy) and harvested 6, 10, 16, 20, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after serum activation. Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and treated with 0.1% sodium citrate, 0.3% NP-40, 0.02 mg/mL RNAse, and 0.05 mg/mL propidium iodide. Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry with a FACScan model (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems).

Internucleosomal DNA Fragmentation
VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells were incubated with labeled oligonucleotides for 72 hours (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 Gy). The 3 cell types were also exposed to external 60Co and electron beam sources (3, 10, 20, and 30 Gy) and processed 24 and 72 hours after irradiation. As a positive control of DNA fragmentation, we treated U937 cells with 1 µmol/L camptothecin, a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor (Sigma) for 6 hours. Genomic DNA was extracted from treated cells as described.21

Transmission Electron Microscopy
VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells were incubated with labeled oligonucleotides for 72 hours (3 and 30 Gy). Cells were fixed in Millonig's sodium phosphate solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and stored in 0.1 mol/L Millonig's solution until processing (50 to 70 nm thick). Transmission electron microscopy was performed with a Zeiss Em10 CA microscope (JFE Enterprises).

Cell Migration and Immunofluorescence
VSMC and EC migration assays were performed with modified Boyden chambers (Neuroprobe Inc) in which cells were allowed to migrate through a polycarbonate membrane (8-µm pore size, Costar Corp).22 Immunostaining was performed to investigate effects of ß irradiation on cell phenotype by incubating cells with either anti–{alpha}-actin or anti–von Willebrand factor antibodies (Sigma) for VSMCs and ECs, respectively.23 After nuclei staining with 0.01% Hoechst solution (Sigma), slides were observed with an epifluorescence microscope. Low ß-irradiation doses (0.4 and 1 Gy) were used to evaluate the setting of migration and phenotype modulation.

Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. Differences between control and irradiated cells were assessed by ANOVA, with subsequent Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was established at a value of P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Local ß-Particle Delivery
We used a phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotide because its high stability has been previously demonstrated.24 The labeled oligomer showed no evidence of radiolysis or degradation within the media even after 7 days (Figure 1Down), demonstrating the high stability of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides in vitro. As illustrated in Figure 2ADown, >95% of cells were positive for fluorescent label, showing that the transfection was highly effective and uniform in vitro. FITC oligomers were localized mainly in the nucleus in accordance with previous studies.24 25 In agreement with the DPK prediction,18 no radiation was reported in adjacent wells (Figure 2BDown); the level and the distribution of ß-particle emission were reinforced by autoradiography analysis (data not shown). Together, these results demonstrated that stable labeled oligonucleotides homogeneously emit ß particles.



View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Stability of 32P-oligonucleotides in the presence of VSMCs 1 to 7 days after transfection. The 15-mers internally labeled conserved the 32P isotope within the sequence. At a lower level, labeled oligomers of 14-mers were also detected, corresponding to the ligation of two 7-mers with an internal 32P within the sequence.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Uniform localization of FITC oligonucleotides in transfected VSMCs. Negative control (omission of fluorescent oligomers) was negligible (data not shown) (magnification x20). B, Dosimetry of ß-particle delivery. Illustration represents dosimetry for 1 µCi of 32P-oligonucleotides distributed in 2 cm2 when incubated for 1, 3, and 5 days in presence of cell monolayer.

Cell Viability
After ß irradiation, viable cell proportion was maintained to an average of 95%±1% (1, 3, and 10 Gy), compared with 96%±0.6% in control VSMCs. Interestingly, molecular ß irradiation, even at high doses (20 and 30 Gy), did not alter significantly VSMC viability (94%±0.9% for 30 Gy, P=NS, vs 1 to 10 Gy), suggesting that 32P-labeled oligonucleotides were not lethal for VSMCs.

Vascular Cell Proliferation
The effect of unlabeled oligonucleotides (<20 nmol/L) on cell proliferation was evaluated to be a reduction of <10%, in accordance with previous studies.20 26 For the first time, we report a significant inhibition of VSMC proliferation with ß irradiation in a dose-dependent manner (0.4 to 10 Gy, Figure 3AUp), with an ED50 at 1.10±0.07 Gy and 1.08±0.12 Gy for porcine and human, respectively, an ED50 statistically similar in both species. Increasing ß dose induced comparable patterns of growth inhibition in ECs, with an ED50 at 2.15±0.10 Gy (Figure 3BUp). However, ED50 comparison of VSMC and EC demonstrated that the ability of ß irradiation to inhibit proliferation was significantly higher in VSMCs compared with that with ECs (P<0.01), except at the highest dose (10 Gy). Removal of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides did not completely abolish the potential inhibitory effect of ß irradiation on VSMC proliferation over 3 to 5 days (P<0.05 vs nonirradiated cells, Figure 4Down).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. VSMC regrowth after 32P-labeled oligonucleotide removal. Data are expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 when regrowing cells were compared with non-irradiated cells.

Cell Cycle Progression in VSMCs
As shown in Figure 5Down, serum-deprived cells were mainly distributed in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle (57%±2%, panel A) with reduced DNA synthesis activity (32%±2%) and low level of cell division (8%±1% in the G2/M phase). Between 3 to 20 hours after serum activation, quiescent cells did not progress into the S phase (data not shown). As previously described,27 24 hours after serum addition, we observed that most of VSMCs progressed into the S phase (85%±3%, Figure 5BDown), and to a lesser extent, cells remained in the G0/G1 state. Interestingly, VSMCs remained in the G0/G1 phase after ß exposure (2, 10, and 30 Gy), with a concomitant reduction in cell cycle progression into the S phase (Figures 5Down and 6Down). ß irradiation did not modify significantly the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Figure 6Down). As illustrated in Figure 5Down, no apoptotic peak corresponding to DNA degradation was noted at low or high ß doses. Investigation of long-term effects of ß exposure on cell cycle progression showed that cells remained mainly in the G0/G1 state (57%±3%) for up to 120 hours.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of ß irradiation on cell cycle progression of VSMCs. Representative cell cycle progression (measured on 6500 cells) of quiescent (A), proliferating (B), 2 Gy–irradiated (C), and 30 Gy–irradiated (D) cells are illustrated. Treatment of 10 Gy gave similar results.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Statistical effect of ß irradiation on cell cycle distribution of VSMCs. Data are represented as mean±SEM. *P<0.01 when proliferating VSMCs were compared with quiescent cells; {diamondsuit}P<0.01 when treated VSMCs were compared with proliferating cells.

Comparative Effects of Local and External Irradiation on DNA Fragmentation
Labeled oligonucleotides at low (3 Gy) and elevated dose ranges (10, 20, and 30 Gy) did not induce DNA fragmentation in VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells (Figure 7ADown). Exposure to 60Co or electron beam sources did not alter DNA integrity in VSMCs and ECs, whereas this type of delivery induced DNA laddering in U937 cells (Figures 7BDown and 7CDown). These data suggest that U937 cells may be more sensible than vascular cells after high dose-rate radiation. Camptothecin also led to severe DNA fragmentation in leukemic cells after 6 hours (Figure 7ADown, lane 4), as previously reported.21



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. DNA fragmentation after local and external irradiation. VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells were exposed to labeled oligonucleotides (A), 60Co (B), or electron beam (C) sources (0, 3, 10, and 30 Gy for lanes 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Intermediate dose (20 Gy) led to similar results. U937 cells were also treated with camptothecin (A, lane 4). MW indicates molecular weight markers.

Morphological Changes and Apoptosis
Electron micrographs showed that after labeled-oligonucleotide irradiation (3 and 30 Gy), VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells conserved normal ultrastructural features (Figure 8Down). Presence of apoptotic cells was identified by the following features: chromatin compaction, cell surface blebbing, cytoplasmic shrinkage, and condensation. Morphological studies reported that the frequency of apoptotic cells in control and ß-irradiated VSMCs, ECs, and U937 cells was<3%, whereas after camptothecin treatment, 50% to 60% of leukemic cells met the apoptosis criteria.21



View larger version (181K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Micrographs of morphology features of ß-irradiated cells. VSMCs (A, B, and C), ECs (D, E, and F), and U937 cells (G, H, and I) were exposed to labeled oligonucleotide (0, 3, and 30 Gy) for 72 hours. For comparison, arrow represents typical apoptotic cell in H and I (<3%), characterized by chromatine condensation within intact nuclear membrane (arrowhead), whereas normal cells had homogeneous chromatine (n) (magnification x6000).

Cell Migration and Phenotype
Our results reported similar inhibitory effect in migration of VSMCs (43%±0.4% and 20%±3.5% of control cell level) and ECs (47.3%±2.5% and 13%±2.3% of control cell level) for doses of 0.4 and 1 Gy, respectively (P<0.001 vs control cells). Proliferating VSMCs showed a weak immunostaining of {alpha}-actin proteins, corresponding to the synthetic phenotype (Figure 9ADown). Local ß irradiation induced an increase in {alpha}-actin fibers that appeared to be dose dependent (Figures 9BDown and 9CDown) and occurred in nearly all cells (>95%, panel D), suggesting the appearance of a contractile phenotype in irradiated VSMCs. With ECs, ß irradiation (0.4 and 1 Gy) did not modify von Willebrand factor immunostaining (data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Immunostaining of {alpha}-actin in ß-irradiated VSMCs (left) with 0 (A), 0.4 (B), and 1 Gy (C) during 72 hours. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst assay (corresponding right panels). D represents superposition of {alpha}-actin and nuclei staining, demonstrating that <95% of irradiated cells were altered (1 Gy) (magnification x40).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The development of endovascular radiotherapy initiated a series of seminal experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of a {gamma} source to prevent restenosis over short-term9 10 12 and long-term observation periods.9 11 28 Verin et al29 and Waksman et al10 30 subsequently demonstrated the effectiveness of a ß source in reducing intimal hyperplasia in rabbit and pig models, respectively. Stent-based approaches were also proposed as platforms from which ß emission could be delivered to the vessel wall.6 7 8 In a landmark trial, Teirstein et al14 reported the successful reduction of restenosis rates in injured arteries with iridium-192. Although the concept of radiotherapy to prevent restenosis recently reached the clinical arena, several questions regarding its mechanism of action on vascular cells remain unanswered. Therefore, we proposed in this study to examine the consequences of ß emission radiation on various fundamental functions of vascular cells such as cell viability, proliferation, and migration. We also dissected the effects of ß radiation on cell cycle progression, apoptosis induction, phenotype modulation, and morphological features in VSMCs and ECs.

To deliver ß particles in a homogenous fashion, we developed a novel approach based on the local delivery of radiolabeled short DNA single strands. We demonstrate that oligomers internally labeled with phosphorus-32 (32P) provided a stable source of radiation and an uniform dose distribution to target cells. Comparison of the effects of sense and antisense sequences demonstrated that both labeled sequences had similar inhibitory effects, supporting the concept that the oligonucleotides only served as a molecular vector to locally deliver ß particles. The 32P-isotope (half-life 14.3 days) has already been adopted by 2 different platforms in coronary radiation clinical trials (wire based and stent based).

To date, few data are available on the biological effects of radiation on vascular cells. Fischell et al31 observed that 32P-radioactive wires inhibited the growth and migratory functions of VSMCs by use of a nonuniform dose distribution. A dose-response effect of a cesium-137 source on VSMC proliferation was reported and showed "reproductive cell death" without, however, any sign of apoptosis.32 The current study reports for the first time that ß irradiation efficiently inhibits human and porcine VSMCs and human ECs in a dose-dependent manner. At a moderate range of ß-particle delivery (0.4 to 6 Gy), ECs appeared to be more radioresistant than VSMCs. No difference, however, could be seen at doses that induced optimal proliferation inhibition. Protocols used in current clinical trials of brachytherapy14 15 16 thus would not be expected to have a different effect on VSMCs and ECs. VSMC growth inhibition was maintained over at least 5 days after radioactive source removal, suggesting either that the effects of ß irradiation are sustained even after source removal or that remaining incorporated intracellular oligonucleotides continued to inhibit proliferation.24

To understand the mechanisms of the inhibitory effect of radiation, we investigated cell cycle progression in irradiated VSMCs. For the first time, we report that ß irradiation caused cells to remain in the G0/G1 phase and reduced cell numbers in the S phase, as leukemic cells after radiotherapy.33 Moreover, this growth arrest was maintained over 5 days. The mechanisms of ß irradiation–induced G1 arrest in VSMCs remain, however, to be defined. Recent recombinant adenoviral strategies reported that adenovirus containing p21,27 p53,34 or retinoblastoma35 efficiently blocked the cell cycle progression and successfully reduced intimal hyperplasia in animals. It may be hypothesized that p53-induced p21 inhibits the cyclin-dependent kinases,36 37 leading to the G1 arrest in irradiated VSMCs.

Previous studies on the effects of external radiation using high dose-rates reported damage leading to "reproductive cell kill"32 33 or apoptosis induction.33 However, "reproductive cell kill" is not synonymous to the loss of physical integrity. The current low dose-rate ß-emission approach did not induce signs of loss of organelle integrity or DNA fragmentation, as shown by ultrastructural and FACS analyses. To compare this low dose-rate approach with that used in brachytherapy, we exposed cells to external sources of {gamma} or electron particles. High dose-rate irradiation did not induce DNA laddering in VSMCs and ECs, whereas leukemic cells appeared to die by radiation-induced DNA fragmentation. This is in accordance with the low level of apoptosis found in rabbit ß-irradiated arteries29 and the absence of apoptosis reported in porcine irradiated arteries.10 The low dose-rate delivery effected by labeled oligonucleotides (2 to 10 cGy/h) is more closely related to that used with radioactive stents6 7 8 than that used in brachytherapy (1 to 5 Gy/min).9 10 12 13 28 Consequently, such low dose-rate strategies could be defined as cytostatic, preserving cell integrity and viability and acting as a growth suppressor.37 Also, no apoptosis could be seen in vascular cells in our high dose-rate experiments. Whether "physical cell kill" is a desirable end point in the objective of preventing clinical restenosis remains unanswered.

In addition to inhibiting cell proliferation, ß irradiation significantly reduced migration of VSMCs and ECs, at much lower ß doses (1 Gy) than those affecting the proliferative properties, suggesting that the migratory function may be more radiosensible than cell growth. ß irradiation inhibited EC migration but failed to alter von Willebrand factor immunostaining, suggesting that reduced migratory function of irradiated ECs may be responsible for potential endothelium-related dysfunction by altering reendothelialization of injury site after balloon angioplasty. VSMC functions are closely related to their phenotype modulation,38 and in proliferative disorders such as restenosis, contractile VSMCs become dedifferentiated and develop the synthetic phenotype. This immature stage, similar to the in vitro conditions, is correlated with a high migratory capacity of VSMCs.38 We demonstrate that low ß irradiation induced the transition from the synthetic to the contractile phenotype as shown by the higher {alpha}-actin immunostaining in ß-irradiated cells.

In conclusion, we report that labeled oligonucleotides inhibited proliferation of VSMCs and ECs in a cell-specific and dose-specific manner by acting as a growth suppressor, resulting in G1 arrest, with no morphological changes and apoptosis induction. ß radiation succeeded in inhibiting cell migration and enhanced the contractile phenotype of VSMCs. By acting on vascular cell function, the ß-radioactive strategy may contribute to prevent intimal hyperplasia after angioplasty.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Fareh is a recipient of a Research Fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Scientific Research Corporation of Canada-Merck Frosst Canada Inc. P. Kermani is a recipient of a Research Traineeship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. The authors are grateful for the exceptional help of S. LeBail, J.F. Corbett, and R. Carrier for the dosimetry.

Received August 11, 1998; revision received November 2, 1998; accepted November 5, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Bittl JA. Advances in coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1290–1302.[Free Full Text]
  2. Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. Molecular therapies for vascular diseases. Science. 1996;272:689–693.[Abstract]
  3. Stephan D, Nabel EG. Gene and other biological therapies for vascular diseases. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1997;11:97–110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Teirstein PS. Beta-radiation to reduce restenosis: too little, too soon? Circulation. 1997;95:1095–1097.[Free Full Text]
  5. Serruys PW, Levendag PC. Intracoronary brachytherapy: the death knell of restenosis or just another episode of a never-ending story. Circulation. 1997;96:709–712.
  6. Hehrlein C, Gollan C, Donges K, Metz J, Reissen R, Fehsenfeld P, von Hodenberg E, Kubler W. Low-dose radioactive endovascular stents prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia in rabbits. Circulation. 1995;92:1570–1575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Laird JR, Carter AJ, Kufs WM, Hoopes TG, Farb A, Nott SH, Fischell RE, Fischell DR, Virmani R, Fischell TA. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation with low-dose irradiation from a beta-particle-emitting stent. Circulation. 1996;93:529–536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rivard A, Bouchard M, Roorda S, Beaudoin G, Carrier R, Leclerc G. Low-dose beta-emitting radioactive stents inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries: an IVUS assessment. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-210. Abstract.
  9. Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, Gravanis MB, Cipolla GD, King SB. Endovascular low-dose irradiation inhibits neointima formation after coronary artery balloon injury in swine. Circulation. 1995;91:1533–1539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Waksman R, Rodriguez JC, Robinson KA, Cipolla GD, Crocker IR, Scott NA, King SB, Wilcox JN. Effect of intravascular irradiation on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and vascular remodeling after balloon overstretch injury of porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1997;96:1944–1952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, Gravanis MB, Palmer SJ, Wang C. Intracoronary radiation before stent implantation inhibits neointima formation in stented porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1995;92:1383–1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Weinberger J, Amols H, Ennis RD, Schwartz A, Wiedermann JG, Marboe C. Intracoronary irradiation: dose response for the prevention of restenosis in swine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:767–775.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Mazur W, Ali MN, Khan MM, Dabaghi SF, Defelice CA, Paradis P, Butler EB, Wright AE, Fajardo LF, French BA, Raizner AE. High dose rate intracoronary radiation for inhibition of neointimal formation in the stented and balloon-injured porcine models of restenosis: angiographic, morphometric and histopathologic analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:777–788.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, Popma JJ, Mintz G, Russo RJ, Schatz RA, Guarneri EM, Steuterman S, Morris N, Leon MB, Tripuraneni P. Catheter-based radiotherapy to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1697–1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Verin V, Urban P, Popowski Y, Schwager M, Nouet P, Dorsaz PA, Chatelain P, Kurtz JM, Rutishauser W. Feasibility of intracoronary beta-irradiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty: a clinical pilot study. Circulation. 1997;95:1138–1144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Candado JA, Waksman R, Gurdiel O, Espinosa R, Gonzalez J, Burger B, Villoria G, Acquatella H, Crocker IR, Seung KB, Liprie SF. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and intracoronary radiation therapy in humans. Circulation. 1997;96:727–732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Russel R. The smooth muscle cell, II: growth of smooth muscle in culture and formation of elastic fibers. J Cell Biol. 1971;50:172–186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Prestwich WV, Kenett TJ. The dose distribution produced by a 32P-coated stent. Med Physics. 1995;22:313–320.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Niedereau C, Fronhoffs K, Klonowski H, Schulz HU. Active pancreatic digestive enzymes show striking differences in their potential to damage isolated rat pancreatic acinar cells. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;125:265–275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Biro S, Fu YM, Yu ZX, Epstein SE. Inhibitory effects of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting c-myc mRNA on smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:654–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sanie AT, Bertrand R. Distinct steps in DNA fragmentation pathway during camptothecin-induced apoptosis involved caspase-, benzyloxycarbonyl- and N-tosyl-L-phenylalanylchloromethyl ketone-sensitive activities. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3066–3072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Skinner MP, Raines EW, Russel R. Dynamic expression of {alpha}1ß1 and {alpha}2ß1 integrin receptors by human vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1070–1081.[Abstract]
  23. Fareh J, Touyz RM, Schiffrin EL, Thibault G. Endothelin-1 and angiotensin II receptors in cells from rat hypertrophied heart: receptor regulation and intracellular calcium modulation. Circ Res. 1996;78:302–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Pickering JG, Isner JM, Ford CM, Weir L, Lazarovits A, Rocnik EF, Chow LH. Processing of chimeric antisense oligonucleotides by human vascular smooth muscle cells and human atherosclerotic plaque: implications for antisense therapy of restenosis after angioplasty. Circulation. 1996;93:772–780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Beltinger C, Saragovi HU, Smith RM, LeSauteur L, Shah N, DeDionisio L, Christensen L, Raible A, Jarett L, Gewirtz AM. Binding, uptake and intracellular trafficking of phosphorothioate-modified oligodeoxynucleotides. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1814–1823.
  26. Pitsch RJ, Goodman GR, Minion DJ, Madura JA, Fox PL, Graham LM. Inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro by antisense oligonucleotide to c-myb. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:783–791.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Chang MW, Barr E, Lu MM, Barton K, Leiden JM. Adenovirus-mediated over-expression of the cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21 inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima formation in the rat carotid artery model of balloon angioplasty. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2260–2268.
  28. Wiederman JG, Marboe C, Amols H, Schwartz A, Weinberger J. Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces neointimal proliferation after balloon angioplasty in swine: persistent benefit at 6-month follow up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1451–1456.[Abstract]
  29. Verin V, Popowski Y, Bochaton-Piallat L, Belenger J, Redard M, Costa M, Neuville P, Celetta G, Gabbiani G, Urban P. Intraarterial beta irradiation reduces medial smooth muscle cell density and induces apoptosis in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit restenosis model. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-219. Abstract.
  30. Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, Wang C, Gravanis MB, Cipolla GD, Hillstead RA, King SB. Intracoronary low-dose beta-irradiation inhibits neointima formation after coronary artery balloon injury in the swine restenosis model. Circulation. 1995;92:3025–3031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Fischell TA, Kharma BK, Fischell DR, Loges PG, Coffey CW, Duggan DM, Naftilan AJ. Low-dose, beta-particle emission from "stent" wire results in complete, localized inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation. 1994;90:2956–2963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gajdusek CM, Tian H, London S, Zhou D, Rasey J, Mayberg MR. Gamma radiation effect on vascular smooth muscle cells in culture. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:821–828.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Hartwell LH, Kastan MB. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science. 1994;266:1821–1828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Katayose D, Wersto R, Cowan K, Seth P. Consequence of p53 gene expression by adenovirus vector on cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;215:446–451.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Smith RC, Wills KN, Antelman D, Perlman H, Truong LN, Krasinski K, Walsh K. Adenoviral constructs encoding phosphorylation-competent full-length and truncated forms of the human retinoblastoma protein inhibit myocyte proliferation and neointima formation. Circulation. 1997;96:1899–1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dynlacht BD. Regulation of transcription by proteins that control the cell cycle. Nature. 1997;389:149–152.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. MacLellan WR, Majesky MW. Cell cycle regulators in vascular disease. Circulation. 1997;96:1717–1719.
  38. Katoh Y, Periasamy M. Growth and differentiation of smooth muscle cells during vascular development. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1996;6:100–106.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. Deiner, E. Shagdarsuren, P. L. Schwimmbeck, P. Rosenthal, C. Loddenkemper, U. Rauch, M. Pauschinger, R. Dietz, H.-P. Schultheiss, R. Dechend, et al.
Nf-{kappa}b and AP-1 activation is associated with late lumen loss after porcine coronary angioplasty and antiproliferative beta-irradiation
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2007; 75(1): 195 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. Li, T. Akimoto, M. Zhang, R. S. Williams, and Z. Yan
Resident stem cells are not required for exercise-induced fiber-type switching and angiogenesis but are necessary for activity-dependent muscle growth
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): C1461 - C1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Roy-Chaudhury, V. P. Sukhatme, and A. K. Cheung
Hemodialysis Vascular Access Dysfunction: A Cellular and Molecular Viewpoint
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 1112 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Levesque, F. Gauthier, J. Raymond, and G. Leclerc
32P-Oligodeoxynucleotide-Coated Coils to Prevent Arterial Recanalization after Embolization
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1062 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T Chatterjee, P D Juelke, P Thum, and P Erne
Successful brachytherapy of coronary vasospasm
Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): e25 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
N. F. MARKO, P. B. DIEFFENBACH, G. YAN, S. CERYAK, R. W. HOWELL, T. A. MCCAFFREY, and V. W. HU
Does metabolic radiolabeling stimulate the stress response? Gene expression profiling reveals differential cellular responses to internal beta vs. external gamma radiation
FASEB J, August 1, 2003; 17(11): 1470 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. H. Shuhaiber, A. N. Evans, M. G. Massad, and A. S. Geha
Mechanisms and future directions for prevention of vein graft failure in coronary bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 22(3): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. Zheng, W. T. Weber, S. Wang, A. J. Wein, S. A. Zderic, S. Chacko, and M. E. DiSanto
Generation of a cell line with smooth muscle phenotype from hypertrophied urinary bladder
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): C373 - C382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Maehara, N. S. Patel, L. B. Harrison, N. J. Weissman, A. B. Bui, H.-S. Kim, A. E. Ajani, M. T. Castagna, T. L. McMillan, N. Yang, et al.
Dose heterogeneity may not affect the neointimal proliferation after gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis: A volumetric intravascular ultrasound dosimetric study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1937 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Kozuma, M.A. Costa, W.J. van der Giessen, M. Sabate, J.M.R. Ligthart, V.L.M.A. Coen, I.P. Kay, A.J. Wardeh, A.H.M. Knook, P.J de Feyter, et al.
Initial observation regarding changes in vessel dimensions after balloon angioplasty and stenting followed by catheter-based {beta}-radiation. Is stenting necessary in the setting of catheter-based radiotherapy?
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2002; 23(8): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. T. Castagna, G. S. Mintz, R. Waksman, J. M. Ahmed, A. Maehara, A. E. Ajani, A. B. Bui, L. F. Satler, W. O. Suddath, K. M. Kent, et al.
Comparative Efficacy of {gamma}-Irradiation for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Vein Graft Versus Native Coronary Artery In-Stent Restenosis: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study
Circulation, December 18, 2001; 104(25): 3020 - 3022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. P. Kay, M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, M. Albertal, W. J. van der Giessen, A. J. Wardeh, J. M. R. Ligthart, V. M. A. Coen, P. C. Levendag, et al.
Positive Geometric Vascular Remodeling Is Seen After Catheter-Based Radiation Followed by Conventional Stent Implantation but Not After Radioactive Stent Implantation
Circulation, September 19, 2000; 102(12): 1434 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Sabate, I. P. Kay, W. J. van der Giessen, A. Cequier, J. M. R. Ligthart, J. A. Gomez-Hospital, S. G. Carlier, V. L. M. A. Coen, J. P. A. Marijnissen, A. J. Wardeh, et al.
Preserved Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Coronary Segments Previously Treated With Balloon Angioplasty and Intracoronary Irradiation
Circulation, October 12, 1999; 100(15): 1623 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fareh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fareh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leclerc, G.