Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:1760-1766

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Iellamo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Iellamo, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATROPINE
*GUANETHIDINE
*PROPRANOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies

(Circulation. 1999;99:1760-1766.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Investigating Feed-Forward Neural Regulation of Circulation From Analysis of Spontaneous Arterial Pressure and Heart Rate Fluctuations

Jacopo M. Legramante, MD; Gianfranco Raimondi, MD; Michele Massaro, MD; Salvatore Cassarino, MD; Giuseppe Peruzzi, MD; Ferdinando Iellamo, MD

From the Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cattedra di Fisiopatologia Medica, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata," Roma, Italia.

Correspondence to Dr Jacopo M. Legramante, Dipartimento Medicina Interna, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata," Via O Raimondo, snc, 00173 Rome, Italy. E-mail legramante{at}med.uniroma2.it


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Analysis of spontaneous fluctuations in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and pulse interval (PI) reveals the occurrence of sequences of consecutive beats characterized by SAP and PI changing in the same (+PI/+SAP and -PI/-SAP) or opposite (-PI/+SAP and +PI/-SAP) direction. Although the former reflects baroreflex regulatory mechanisms, the physiological meaning of -PI/+SAP and +PI/-SAP is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that -PI/+SAP and +PI/-SAP "nonbaroreflex" sequences represent a phenomenon modulated by the autonomic nervous system reflecting a feed-forward mechanism of cardiovascular regulation.

Methods and Results—We studied anesthetized rabbits before and after (1) complete autonomic blockade (guanethidine+propranolol+atropine, n=13; CAB), (2) sympathetic blockade (guanethidine+propranolol, n=15; SB), (3) parasympathetic blockade (atropine, n=16), (4) sinoaortic denervation (n=10; SAD), and (5) controlled respiration (n=10; CR). Nonbaroreflex sequences were defined as >=3 beats in which SAP and PI of the following beat changed in the opposite direction. CAB reduced the number of nonbaroreflex sequences (19.1±12.3 versus 88.7±36.6, P<0.05), as did SB (25.3±11.7 versus 84.6±23.9, P<0.001) and atropine (11.2±6.8 versus 94.1±32.4, P<0.05). SB concomitantly increased baroreflex sensitivity (1.18±0.11 versus 0.47±0.09 ms/mm Hg, P<0.01). SAD and CR did not significantly affect their occurrence.

Conclusions—These results suggest that nonbaroreflex sequences represent the expression of an integrated, neurally mediated, feed-forward type of short-term cardiovascular regulation able to interact dynamically with the feedback mechanisms of baroreflex origin in the control of heart period.


Key Words: nervous system, autonomic • baroreceptors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the intact circulation, beat-by-beat spontaneous fluctuations in RR interval have been shown to be linked to beat-by-beat changes in arterial pressure through baroreflex mechanisms. Analysis of the continuous relationship between systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and RR interval revealed that spontaneous increases or decreases in SAP induce directionally similar reflex changes in RR interval.1 On this basis, a new technique, called spontaneous baroreflex, has been developed for dynamically studying the arterial baroreflex control of the sinus node.2 This method, used in a number of laboratories,3 4 is based on the computer scanning of SAP and RR interval (or pulse interval, PI) time series to identify sequences of spontaneously occurring consecutive beats in which SAP and PI of the following beat change in the same direction, ie, hypertensive/bradycardic and hypotensive/tachycardic sequences.

Beat-by-beat analysis of the continuous relationship between spontaneous fluctuations in SAP and RR interval also reveals the occurrence of sequences of consecutive beats in which SAP and RR interval (or PI) of the following beat change in the opposite direction (ie, hypertensive/tachycardic and hypotensive/bradycardic sequences). These sequences have been defined as nonbaroreflex, but their physiological meaning and thus their possible role in the cardiovascular regulation have not been established.

Cardiovascular neural regulation involves both central controllers and peripheral reflex mechanisms operating with feedback features (eg, arterial baroreflexes) that interact in modulating the dynamic heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure fluctuations. However, studies performed in both anesthetized and conscious animals5 6 have indicated that reflex mechanisms operating with positive feedback features could contribute to the neural regulation of the cardiovascular system and to the modulation of HR and arterial pressure variability.7 Moreover, feed-forward mechanisms of cardiovascular regulation operating through mechanically coupled changes in systolic arterial pressure and HR have also been described in humans.8 9 10

On the basis of the above considerations, the concomitant occurrence of nonbaroreflex with baroreflex sequences suggests the intriguing possibility that nonbaroreflex sequences might represent an expression of autonomic regulatory mechanisms operating with feed-forward (or positive feedback) features as opposed to negative feedback mechanisms, mediated mainly by the arterial baroreflexes.

Accordingly, the aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the spontaneously occurring nonbaroreflex sequences represent a physiological phenomenon modulated by the autonomic nervous system, reflecting a feed-forward mechanism of cardiovascular regulation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
General Procedures
The study was performed on 64 adult New Zealand rabbits of both sexes (weight, 2.5 to 3.5 kg). After induction of anesthesia by ketamine (30 mg/kg IM), the ear marginal vein was cannulated for drug infusion. Afterward, the rabbits were anesthetized with {alpha}-chloralose (25 mg/kg) and urethane (250 mg/kg IV). Tracheotomy was then performed, and the trachea was intubated with a polyethylene cannula of the same diameter for measurement of respiratory flow. Rectal temperature was monitored continuously by a thermocouple (Hewlett Packard 21058 A) and maintained at 38±0.5°C by means of a steel hot plate on the operating table and infrared lamps. Heparin was given (10 mg/kg IV, with supplemental hourly doses of 2 mg/kg) to prevent blood clotting.

Sinoaortic Denervation
The vagus nerves and carotid bifurcations were exposed through a midline incision in the neck. The infranodose cervical vagi were infiltrated with lidocaine (2% solution) before cutting. Carotid bifurcations and the external carotid sinuses to the origin of the lingual artery were stripped free from all surrounding tissue; the mass of nerves and fascia, including the carotid sinus nerves, was carefully excised. Aortic nerves were sectioned at midcervical level.

Recorded Variables
Arterial pressure and PI were continuously recorded from the femoral artery via a polyethylene cannula connected to a Gould pressure transducer (P23XL). HR was monitored by a tachograph triggered by the pressure pulse or by an ECG (Gould 13-G4615-65A).

The respiratory airflow was recorded with a pneumotachograph (Gould Fleish 000-369500) connected to the tracheal cannula and to a differential gas pressure transducer (Validyne DP45) that was integrated with a Gould integrator amplifier (13-G4615-70) to give tidal volume (VT) and pulmonary ventilation (VE). Both inspiratory and expiratory waveforms of the respiratory cycle were integrated and recorded. Breathing frequency (f) was calculated from the interbreath period.

Arterial blood O2 and CO2 partial pressure (PaO2 and PaCO2) and arterial pH (pHa) were determined at 37°C by use of a blood gas analyzer (AVL 330); the results were corrected to the animal temperature. PaO2, PaCO2, and pHa were measured at the beginning of the experiment and maintained within the following ranges: PaO2, {approx}90 mm Hg, PaCO2, 28 to 36 mm Hg, and pHa, 7.35 to 7.40. When necessary, PaO2 was increased by enriching the inspired air with O2 supply, and pH was corrected by infusing a 10-mEq/mL solution of sodium bicarbonate.

Sequences Analysis
The beat-by-beat time series of SAP and PI were analyzed by a computer to identify spontaneously occurring sequences of >=3 consecutive beats in which SAP and PI of the following (ie, lag 1) beat changed in the opposite direction, eg, SAP increasing and PI decreasing (ie, hypertension and tachycardia). These sequences were identified as nonbaroreflex sequences (Figure 1Down). Simultaneously, the sequences characterized by >=3 consecutive beats in which SAP and PI of the following beat spontaneously changed in the same direction, either increasing or decreasing (ie, baroreflex sequences), were also searched (Figure 1Down). The threshold change between 2 consecutive SAP or PI values was set at 0.3 mm Hg and 0.6 ms, respectively. Linear regression was applied to each individual sequence, similar to the Oxford technique that uses bolus injections of vasoactive drugs. Only those sequences in which r2>0.85 were accepted to minimize the possibility of counting a sequence in which random variations in SAP and PI appeared as a sequence. The number of nonbaroreflex sequences was calculated. Separate calculations were made for sequences in which SAP increased and PI decreased (-PI/+SAP) and for those in which SAP decreased and PI increased (+PI/-SAP).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Examples of blood pressure and ECG signals and corresponding PIs. Signals refer to sequences during which SAP and PI of following beat changed in same direction, either increasing or decreasing (baroreflex sequences), and to sequences during which SAP and PI of following beat changed in opposite direction, eg, SAP increased and PI decreased or vice versa (nonbaroreflex sequences).

The beat-by-beat time series of SAP and PI were also searched for sequences >=3 consecutive beats in which SAP and PI of the same beat (ie, lag 0) changed in the opposite direction. The number of these sequences also was calculated.

A separate analysis of baroreflex sequences in which SAP and PI increased (+PI/+SAP) and decreased (-PI/-SAP) was also performed. The mean individual slope of the baroreflex and nonbaroreflex sequences, obtained by averaging all slopes computed within a given experimental period, was calculated and taken as a measure of the integrated spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity and the gain in nonbaroreflex mechanisms, respectively, for that period.

Experimental Protocol
Experiments were performed on 5 separate groups of rabbits. After any surgical procedure, the rabbits were allowed to stabilize for 30 minutes before experiments began.

Group 1
Thirteen rabbits were studied under baseline conditions and after complete autonomic pharmacological blockade (guanethidine 2.5 mg/kg IV plus propranolol 2 mg/kg IV and atropine 2.5 mg/kg IV). The effectiveness of complete autonomic blockade was tested by measuring the cardiovascular responses to ephedrine (5 mg/kg IV), isoproterenol (8 {gamma}/kg IV), and acetylcholine (1 to 2 {gamma}/kg IV), and only the rabbits in which the responses were abolished by the blocking drugs were accepted for the study.

Group 2
Fifteen rabbits were studied under baseline conditions and after sympathetic pharmacological blockade (guanethidine 2.5 mg/kg IV plus propranolol 2 mg/kg IV). The effectiveness of sympathetic blockade was tested by measuring the cardiovascular responses to ephedrine (5 mg/kg IV) and isoproterenol (8 {gamma}/kg IV), and only the rabbits in which the responses were abolished by the blocking drugs were accepted for the study.

Group 3
Sixteen rabbits were studied before and after parasympathetic pharmacological blockade (atropine 2.5 mg/kg IV). The effectiveness of parasympathetic blockade was tested by measuring the cardiovascular responses to acetylcholine (1 to 2 {gamma}/kg IV), and only the rabbits in which the responses were abolished by the blocking drugs were accepted for the study.

Group 4
Ten rabbits were studied before and after sinoaortic denervation (SAD). The effectiveness of SAD was indicated by abolition of the bradycardic response to intravenous bolus injections of phenylephrine after the surgical procedure compared with control (-77.6±8.5 versus -7.4±3.2 bpm).

Group 5
To evaluate the possible influence of respiration on the expression of the nonbaroreflex sequences, 10 rabbits were studied under control conditions and during controlled respiration, obtained by artificially ventilating the animals by means of an automatic ventilator (Small Animal Ventilator, Harvard) after they had been paralyzed with triethiodide gallamine (3 to 5 mg/kg IV). The animals were studied under an artificially maintained VE similar to that recorded while the animals were breathing spontaneously and under VE levels artificially increased up to 25% of the values observed in each animal during spontaneous breathing by increasing either f or VT separately.

Data and Statistical Analyses
All circulatory and respiratory variables were recorded on a Hewlett Packard 8-channel magnetic tape recorder (3968A) and on a Gould 8-channel polygraph (TA 4000). The data were stored and analyzed by a computerized online system for biological data elaboration. The latter has a hardware signal-conditioning system set up in our laboratory that detects the RR and/or PI by means of a dedicated trigger (set on the ECG signal and/or the arterial pressure wave, respectively) and can nominally discriminate minute differences between systolic pressure peaks, allowing a maximal error of 25 µs (equivalent to a sample frequency of 40 kHz). A second parallel hardware conditioning block detected the systolic peak by means of a peak detector that allows a maximal error of 0.06 mm Hg and is independent of sample frequency, depending only on the resolution of the AD converter (in our case, 12 bit).

Reported data were calculated from SAP and PI time series length of 4500 beats in each experimental period. The significance of the differences in the reported data between control and test periods within each experimental groups was evaluated by Student's t test for paired observations. One-way ANOVA was used to compare changes in the number of nonbaroreflex sequences occurring after sympathetic versus parasympathetic pharmacological blockade experiments. A paired t test was also used to evaluate the significance of differences in the number of lag 1 versus lag 0 sequences. All data are presented as mean±SEM. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Complete autonomic blockade induced a significant decrease in arterial pressure and HR (Table 1Down). Under control conditions, before complete autonomic blockade, the number of spontaneous nonbaroreflex sequences did not differ significantly on going from lag 1 to lag 0 (88.7±36.6 versus 133.4±48.2, P=0.27). The number of nonbaroreflex sequences (lag 1) was significantly decreased by complete autonomic blockade (Figure 2Down). This reduction was due to a significant and marked decrease in the number of both the hypertensive/tachycardic (-PI/+SAP) and the hypotensive/bradycardic (+PI/-SAP) sequences (Table 2Down). As shown in Figure 2Down, the mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences did not show significant changes. Similarly, also the number of lag 0 sequences was significantly decreased by complete autonomic blockade (Figure 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cardiovascular and Respiratory Responses to Sympathetic Blockade, Atropine, Complete Autonomic Blockade, and SAD



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Number and slope of nonbaroreflex sequences under control conditions and after sympathetic pharmacological blockade (SB, n=15), atropine (A, n=16), complete autonomic blockade (CAB, n=13), and sinoaortic denervation (SAD, n=10). Data are shown as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs control.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in the Number of Sequences in Response to Sympathetic Blockade, Atropine, Complete Autonomic Blockade, and SAD



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Number of lag 0 sequences under control conditions and after complete autonomic blockade (CAB, n=13) and sinoaortic denervation (SAD, n=10). **P<0.01 vs control.

Selective sympathetic blockade induced a significant decrease in the number of nonbaroreflex sequences (Figure 2Up), which involved both the -PI/+SAP and +PI/-SAP sequences (Table 2Up).

The mean slope of the baroreflex sequences showed a significant increase after sympathetic blockade, rising from 0.47±0.09 to 1.18±0.11 ms/mm Hg (P<0.01), indicating an increased gain (or sensitivity) in the baroreflex mechanisms controlling heart period. The increase in baroreceptor–cardiac reflex sensitivity was significant in response to both SAP increases and decreases (ie, activating and deactivating stimuli). The mean slope of the +PI/+SAP and -PI/-SAP sequences increased from 0.51±0.10 to 1.36±0.18 ms/mm Hg,(P<0.01) and from 0.40±0.06 to 1.03±0.15 ms/mm Hg, (P<0.01), respectively. On the contrary, the mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences did not show significant changes (Figure 2Up).

After parasympathetic blockade, HR significantly increased, whereas arterial pressure slightly decreased (Table 1Up). After atropine, the number of the nonbaroreflex sequences was significantly reduced (Figure 2Up), and again this reduction involved both the -PI/+SAP and +PI/-SAP sequences (Table 2Up). The mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences did not show significant changes (Figure 2Up).

The mean change in the number of nonbaroreflex sequences in response to the sympathetic blockade (-59.2±16.0 from a control of 84.6±23.9) was not significantly different from that observed in response to the parasympathetic blockade (-82.9±29.0 from a control of 94.1±32.4, P=0.5).

SAD did not significantly change both the number and the mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences (Table 2Up and Figure 2Up). On the contrary, the number of lag 0 sequences was significantly decreased by SAD (Figure 3Up). As expected, the baroreflex sequences showed a significant and substantial decrease (Figure 4Down).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Number of baroreflex sequences, characterized by consecutive beats in which SAP and PI spontaneously changed in same direction, either increasing (+PI/+SAP) or decreasing (-PI/-SAP), under control conditions and after sinoaortic denervation (SAD). Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=10). *P<0.05 vs control.

Controlled respiration did not significantly affect the number of the nonbaroreflex sequences (Figure 5Down). In this experimental set, we did not focus on baroreflex sequences because it has previously been shown that controlled respiration does not affect either their number or the mean slope.3



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Number of nonbaroreflex sequences under baseline conditions and after artificially induced increases in pulmonary ventilation obtained by increasing either breathing frequency (f) or tidal volume (VT). Data are expressed as mean±SEM (n=10).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The main goal of the present investigation was to test the hypothesis that nonbaroreflex sequences of spontaneously occurring consecutive heartbeats characterized by consensual, linearly related increases in SAP and HR (decrease in PI) could reflect a cardiovascular regulatory mechanism modulated by the autonomic nervous system operating with feed-forward (or positive feedback) characteristics.

Previous studies dealing with the possible role played by feed-forward mechanisms in the regulation of the cardiovascular system8 9 10 have addressed mainly the circulatory mechanics modulating blood pressure and HR dynamics through the "runoff phenomenon"8 or the mechanical coupling between HR and arterial pressure.9 10 These mechanisms could have been involved in determining the occurrence of the nonbaroreflex sequences. We tried to disentangle the contribution of mechanical from putative neural feed-forward mechanisms by inducing a complete autonomic blockade at the target function level. Complete autonomic blockade drastically and significantly reduced the number of the hypertensive/tachycardic and hypotensive/bradycardic sequences, thus indicating that in anesthetized rabbits the occurrence of spontaneous nonbaroreflex sequences is mediated primarily by the autonomic nervous system.

We also tried to obtain a more detailed picture of the neural pathways involved in the occurrence of the nonbaroreflex sequences by inducing selective blockades of the efferent sympathetic and parasympathetic activities. Both sympathetic and parasympathetic blockades significantly decreased the number of "nonbaroreflex sequences, thus suggesting that both branches of the autonomic nervous system take part in this positive feedback mechanism of short-term cardiovascular neural regulation.

Our finding of a sympathetic contribution to the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences is consistent with that of Pagani et al6 of a positive feedback sympathetic reflex elicitable in the dog by mechanical stretching of the thoracic aorta. In that study, the consensual increases in SAP and HR induced by aortic distension (within ranges mimicking the effects of physiological increases in AP on aortic wall) were in fact reduced or abolished after pharmacological sympathetic blockade.

In our study, sympathetic blockade not only produced a decrease in the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences but also resulted in a significant increase in the gain of the spontaneous baroreflex sequences. An increased baroreflex sensitivity after sympathetic blockade has consistently been reported in humans,11 12 13 but the mechanisms responsible for this enhancement have not been clearly established.11 12 13 14 One possible explanation, ensuing from previous studies6 15 and supported by the present one, is that the increased spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity observed after sympathetic blockade might be caused in part by the decreased influence of feed-forward neural mechanisms normally opposing the negative feedback mechanisms of baroreflex origin. Pagani et al6 reported an attenuation of the bradycardic response to phenylephrine during the hypertensive/tachycardic reflex elicited in the conscious dog by stretching of the thoracic aorta, an observation that is reciprocal of our result of an increased gain in the integrated spontaneous baroreceptor-cardiac reflex after sympathetic blockade. On the other hand, the interruption of the sympathomediated excitatory influences by activation of cardiovascular spinal afferents has been reported to increase the reflex bradycardic response to acute arterial pressure rises.15

Taken together, the results of previous6 15 and present investigations support the concept that neural regulatory mechanisms with positive feedback characteristics play a role in the physiological control of circulation interacting dynamically with the negative feedback mechanisms.7

It is noteworthy that both the hypertensive/tachycardic and hypotensive/bradycardic sequences appear to be modulated by the sympathetic nervous system inasmuch as both decreased significantly after sympathetic blockade. The complex nature of neural cardiovascular regulation is further stressed by the observation that the occurrence of the nonbaroreflex sequences appears to be also under the control of the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system, as indicated by their significant decrease after atropine alone. Overall, the above results might be interpreted as indicating that the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences is due to a synergistic contribution of the sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, whose relative modalities are difficult to ascertain. Growing evidence indicates that the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems may regulate the cardiovascular system in a parallel instead of a reciprocal fashion,16 17 18 19 interacting at different levels.20 21 On the other hand, physiological variations in autonomic outflows have been shown to be capable of modulating the expression of feed-forward regulatory mechanisms in humans.9 22

The mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences that within the framework of this study would represent the approximate gain in the transfer function of the positive feedback control mechanisms was not significantly changed by pharmacological manipulations of the autonomic nervous system. At variance with the baroreflex sequences that are mainly vagally mediated,2 23 the nonbaroreflex sequences appear to be modulated by both the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems. How the nonlinear frequency properties of these components and their dynamic interaction17 may have affected the gain of the nonbaroreflex sequences cannot be elucidated with the sequences technique. Further studies incorporating more complex methodologies are needed to clarify this point.

Our data indicate that the lag used to pair SAP and PI values significantly affects the physiological meaning of sequences of spontaneously occurring consecutive heartbeats. Like the nonbaroreflex (ie, lag 1) sequences, lag 0 sequences would be neurally mediated because of their decrease after complete autonomic blockade. However, at variance with the nonbaroreflex, lag 0 sequences appear to be modulated by the arterial baroreflexes because they were significantly reduced by SAD, which did not affect lag 1 sequences. These results would confirm those of Blaber et al24 suggesting that consecutive heartbeats sequences in which the SAP and RR interval of the same beat change in the opposite direction could represent artifacts created by baroreflex activity related to a phase relationship between systolic blood pressure and RR interval.24

We used controlled breathing to determine whether respiration, with its neural and nonneural modulating effects on arterial pressure and HR,25 26 was linked to the observation of nonbaroreflex sequences. However, the more regular breathing occurring during artificially induced ventilation did not significantly affect the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences (Figure 5Up).

Study Limitations
The main limitation is that only a small number of beats ({approx}5%) was organized in sequences characterized by a nonbaroreflex pattern. This finding should not be interpreted as indicating that feed-forward mechanisms are not engaged for a prominent fraction of time or that they modulate the sinus node only in a sequencelike fashion. It may only reflect an intrinsic limitation of the sequences method. This observation could be also explained, at least in part, by the use of anesthetized animals because acute anesthesia negatively affects the cardiovascular neural modulation. The small value of the slopes observed in the present study also might have been caused in part by the anesthesia and the elevated level of HR.23 27 However, these factors did not prevent us from observing significant effects on spontaneous baroreflex slope when they occurred, such as after sympathetic blockade. We also considered the possibility that the anesthetic agents could have abolished some neural traffic, so that by the time the pharmacological blockades of the autonomic nervous system were done, there was not much efferent sympathetic and/or parasympathetic activity to oppose. However, the significant cardiovascular changes in response to the different pharmacological blockades (Table 1Up) make this possibility unlikely, suggesting that despite the anesthesia, there was enough sympathetic and/or parasympathetic activity to oppose in the experimental conditions of the present investigation.

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the continuous relationship between spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and heart period is neurally modulated not only through negative feedback coupling mechanisms, as reflected by the baroreflex sequences, but also through positive feedback mechanisms, as would be reflected by the nonbaroreflex sequences characterized by consensual, linearly related changes in SAP and HR. Finally, this neurally mediated, feed-forward type of short-term cardiovascular regulation seems able to interact dynamically with the negative feedback mechanisms in the control of heart period.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Legramante has been recipient of the Italian Society of Internal Medicine Award for Young Researcher (1994–1995) for this research project. This study was also supported in part by MURST (60%) (1994) and by the "Agenzia Spaziale Italiana" (grant ASI-95-RS-143). We gratefully acknowledge Marco Pallante and Alberto Vespa for their technical assistance.

Received August 7, 1998; revision received November 9, 1998; accepted November 23, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Fritsch JM, Eckberg DL, Graves LD, Wallin G. Arterial pressure ramps provoke linear increases of heart period in humans. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:R1086–R1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bertineri G, Di Rienzo M, Cavallazzi A, Ferrari AU, Pedotti A, Mancia G. Evaluation of baroreceptor reflex by blood pressure monitoring in unanesthetized cats. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:H377–H383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hughson RL, Quintin L, Annat G, Yamamoto Y, Gharib C. Spontaneous baroreflex by sequence and power spectral methods in humans. Clin Physiol. 1993;13:663–676.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Iellamo F, Legramante JM, Raimondi G, Castrucci F, Massaro M, Peruzzi G. Evaluation of reproducibility of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests. J Hypertens. 1996;4:1099–1104.
  5. Lioy F, Malliani A, Pagani M, Recordati G, Schwartz PJ. Reflex hemodynamic responses initiated from the thoracic aorta. Circ Res. 1974;34:78–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pagani M, Pizzinelli P, Bergamaschi M, Malliani A. A positive feedback sympathetic pressor reflex during stretch of the thoracic aorta in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1982;50:125–132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Malliani A. Homeostasis and instability: the hypothesis of tonic interaction in the cardiovascular regulation of negative and positive feedback mechanisms. In: Lown B, Malliani A, Prosdocimi M, eds. Neural Mechanisms and Cardiovascular Disease. Berlin, Germany: Liviana Press/Springer Verlag; 1986:1–9. Fidia Research Series Vol 5.
  8. Baselli G, Cerutti S, Civardi S, Malliani A, Pagani M. Cardiovascular variability signals: towards the identification of a closed-loop model of the neural control mechanisms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:1033–1046.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Taylor JA, Eckberg DL. Fundamental relations between short-term RR interval and arterial pressure oscillations in humans. Circulation. 1996;93:1527–1532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mullen TJ, Appel ML, Mukkamala R, Mathias JM, Cohen RJ. System identification of closed-loop cardiovascular control: effects of posture and autonomic blockade. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H448–H461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pickering TG, Gribbin B, Petersen ES, Cunningham DJC, Sleight P. Effects of autonomic blockade on the baroreflex in man at rest and during exercise. Circ Res. 1972;30:177–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Eckberg DL, Abboud FM, Mark AL. Modulation of carotid baroreflex responsiveness in man: effects of posture and propranolol. J Appl Physiol. 1976;41:383–387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lucini D, Pagani M, Mela GS, Malliani A. Sympathetic restraint of baroreflex control of heart period in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Clin Sci. 1994;86:547–556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Eckberg DL. Beta-adrenergic blockade may prolong life in post-infarction patients in part by increasing vagal cardiac inhibition. Med Hypotheses. 1984;15:421–432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gnecchi Ruscone T, Lombardi F, Malfatto G, Malliani A. Attenuation of baroreceptive mechanisms by cardiovascular sympathetic afferent fibers. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H787–H791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kollai M, Koizumi R. Reciprocal and nonreciprocal action of the vagal and sympathetic nerves innervating the heart. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1979;1:33–52.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kawada T, Sugimachi M, Shishido T, Miyano H, IkedaY, Yoshimura R, Sato T, Takaki H, Alexander J Jr, Sunagawa K. Dynamic vagosympathetic interaction augments heart rate response irrespective of stimulation patterns. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H2180–H2187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Eckberg DL, Mohanty SK, Raczkowska M. Trigeminal baroreceptor reflex interactions modulate human cardiac vagal efferent activity. J Physiol (Lond). 1984;347:75–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Fagius J, Sundlof G. The diving response in man: effects on sympathetic activity in muscle and skin nerve fascicles. J Physiol (Lond). 1986;377:428–443.
  20. Wetzel GT, Goldstein D, Brown JH. Acetylcholine release from rat atria can be regulated through an {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor. Circ Res. 1985;56:763–766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Manabe N, Foldes FF, Töröcsik A, Nagashima H, Goldiner PL, Vizi ES. Presynaptic interaction between vagal and sympathetic innervation in the heart: modulation of acetylcholine and noradrenaline release. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1991;32:233–242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Blaber AP, Yamamoto Y, Hughson RL. Change in phase relationship between SBP and R-R interval during lower body negative pressure. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1688–H1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Frankel RA, Metting PJ, Britton SL. Evaluation of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in conscious dogs. J Physiol (Lond). 1993;462:31–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Blaber AP, Yamamoto Y, Hughson RL. Methodology of spontaneous baroreflex relationship assessed by surrogate data analysis. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1682–H1687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Perlini S, Soldà PL, Piepoli M, Sala-Gallini G, Calciati A, Finardi G, Bernardi L. Determinants of respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the vagotomized rabbits. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H909–H915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Taha BH, Simon PM, Dempsey JA, Skatrud JB, Iber C. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: an obligatory role for vagal feedback from the lungs. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:638–645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. O'Leary DS, Seamans DP. Effect of exercise on autonomic mechanisms of baroreflex control of heart rate. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:2251–2257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Silvani, D. Grimaldi, S. Vandi, G. Barletta, R. Vetrugno, F. Provini, G. Pierangeli, C. Berteotti, P. Montagna, G. Zoccoli, et al.
Sleep-dependent changes in the coupling between heart period and blood pressure in human subjects
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): R1686 - R1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Sala-Mercado, M. Ichinose, R. L. Hammond, M. Coutsos, T. Ichinose, M. Pallante, F. Iellamo, and D. S. O'Leary
Spontaneous baroreflex control of heart rate versus cardiac output: altered coupling in heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1304 - H1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. Berteotti, V. Asti, V. Ferrari, C. Franzini, P. Lenzi, G. Zoccoli, and A. Silvani
Central and baroreflex control of heart period during the wake-sleep cycle in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R293 - R298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
G. Gulli, V. E. Claydon, V. L. Cooper, and R. Hainsworth
R-R interval-blood pressure interaction in subjects with different tolerances to orthostatic stress
Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 367 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Halamek, T. Kara, P. Jurak, M. Soucek, D. P. Francis, L. C. Davies, W. K. Shen, A. J.S. Coats, M. Novak, Z. Novakova, et al.
Variability of Phase Shift Between Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Fluctuations: A Marker of Short-Term Circulation Control
Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 292 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. A. Lanfranchi and V. K Somers
Arterial baroreflex function and cardiovascular variability: interactions and implications
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): R815 - R826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Malliani and N. Montano
Emerging Excitatory Role of Cardiovascular Sympathetic Afferents in Pathophysiological Conditions
Hypertension, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. M. Legramante, G. Raimondi, M. Massaro, and F. Iellamo
Positive and Negative Feedback Mechanisms in the Neural Regulation of Cardiovascular Function in Healthy and Spinal Cord-Injured Humans
Circulation, March 6, 2001; 103(9): 1250 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Di Rienzo, G. Parati, P. Castiglioni, R. Tordi, G. Mancia, and A. Pedotti
Baroreflex effectiveness index: an additional measure of baroreflex control of heart rate in daily life
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): R744 - R751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Porta, G. Baselli, O. Rimoldi, A. Malliani, and M. Pagani
Assessing baroreflex gain from spontaneous variability in conscious dogs: role of causality and respiration
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2558 - H2567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Iellamo, P. Pizzinelli, M. Massaro, G. Raimondi, G. Peruzzi, and J. M. Legramante
Muscle Metaboreflex Contribution to Sinus Node Regulation During Static Exercise : Insights From Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability
Circulation, July 6, 1999; 100(1): 27 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Iellamo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Iellamo, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATROPINE
*GUANETHIDINE
*PROPRANOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE
Related Collections
Right arrow Autonomic, reflex, and neurohumoral control of circulation
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies