(Circulation. 1999;99:1795-1801.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Cardiology B (M.B., H.E.B., H.S., T.T.N.), and The PET Center (M.B.), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; and Division of Nuclear Medicine (J.C.), Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.
Correspondence to Morten Bøttcher, MD, Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. E-mail skejmb{at}aau.dk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsMyocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured, using PET, at rest (MBF-rest) and during intravenous dipyridamole (MBF-DIP) in 25 women (mean age 53±7 years) with SX. Thirty healthy volunteers served as controls. One group (A) consisted of 15 age-matched female volunteers (54±10 years). The other control group consisted of 15 young healthy women (B; 24±5 years). In 12 SX patients, MBF-rest and MBF during cold pressor testing were also measured after infusion of L-arginine (6.7 g/min for 45 minutes). The increase in MBF after cold pressor testing was similar in the SX group compared with controls. L-arginine did not affect MBF-rest (0.83±0.14 versus 0.89±0.13 mL · g-1 · min-1) or MBF after cold pressor test (0.95±0.10 versus 1.03±0.17 mL · g-1min-1). In contrast, the hyperemic response to DIP was blunted compared with the group A controls (1.68±0.49 versus 2.34±0.45 mL · g-1 · min-1, P<0.05); this resulted in a significant reduction of the coronary flow reserve in SX patients relative to controls (2.03±0.53 versus 2.96±0.63 mL · g-1 · min-1, P<0.01).
ConclusionsIn patients with SX, the microcirculatory response to cold, reflecting the endothelium function, is normal and unaltered by intravenous L-arginine. This suggests preserved microcirculatory endothelial function. However, a markedly attenuated hyperemic flow and flow reserve after DIP suggest a dysfunction of the adenosine-mediated endothelium-independent vasodilatation at the microcirculatory level in these patients.
Key Words: blood flow l-arginine angina syndrome X tomography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, myocardial perfusion studies have demonstrated an impaired flow response to both pace stress and pharmacological vasodilation in patients with SX.6 The fact that these abnormalities have been demonstrated by several methods, including PET,5 7 8 intracoronary Doppler guide wire,5 9 and thermodilution measurement of coronary sinus blood flow6 10 strengthens the conclusion that an abnormal flow reserve does exist. The mechanisms, which may impair CFR, are not known, when specific vascular or cardiac disorders have been excluded. Several investigations have suggested that not only endothelium-independent vasodilation but also dependent vasodilation is impaired in patients with SX.11 Whether this causes the myocardial perfusion to decrease is not clear, and in the absence of myocardial ischemia, the mechanism for the generation of angina pectoris still lacks an explanation.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether microcirculatory endotheliumdependent and independent vasodilation is impaired in patients with SX and whether L-arginine supplementation enhances endothelium-dependent vasodilatation at the level of microcirculation in these patients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.1 mV in at least 2 precordial leads), completely normal
coronary arteriography, and a negative hyperventilation test.
All patients had normal left ventricular function at
ventriculography and normal echocardiographic
examination. None of the patients had hypertension (systolic
blood pressure >180 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure
>95 mm Hg), dyslipidemia (plasma
cholesterol >8 mmol/L, serum triglyceride
<3.5 mmol/L), history of diabetes mellitus, plasma glucose
>7.5 mmol/L or glucosuria, obesity (defined as body mass index
>30 kg/m2), or bundle branch block on the ECG.
Ten of the SX patients were postmenopausal and 4 received hormone
replacement therapy; 7 in control group A were postmenopausal and 3
were on hormone replacement therapy. Myocardial lactate exchange
at rest and in response to pace stress at 150 bpm for 10 minutes was
assessed with measurement of coronary sinus blood flow by
thermodilution technique with a 7-F Wilton-Webster catheter (Webster
Labs, Inc). Analysis of lactate in blood samples was drawn
simultaneously from the coronary sinus and the
femoral artery.5 Myocardial lactate production was
not observed in any of the patients at rest, during pace stress, or in
the recovery period after pacing. Fifteen healthy age- and sex-matched volunteers served as controls (mean age 54±10 years; group A). A group of 15 young female volunteers (group B; mean age 24±5 years) served as a second control group. All volunteers had low likelihood of coronary artery disease by Baysian analysis; this was evidenced by a normal physical examination, resting ECG, and absence of any significant risk factors. None of the participants had a history of elevated serum cholesterol levels, hypertension, or diabetes. None of the participants received any medication. Individuals with bronchial asthma were excluded from the study because of the risk of untoward side effects of dipyridamole (DIP).
All study participants refrained from intake of caffeine-containing food or beverages for at least 24 hours before each study.12 All participants gave written informed consent as approved by the county ethics committee.
Study Protocol
The study protocol consisted of serial N-13 ammonia PET
blood flow measurements. For 12 of the 25 SX patients on day 1,
myocardial blood flow was studied at rest, during cold pressor testing
(CPT) after infusion of L-arginine, and finally during
DIP-induced hyperemia. On a different day, MBF was
measured during CPT and at rest after infusion of
L-arginine. The study sequence was performed in random
order with a mean difference of 7±2 days between the 2 studies. The
remaining 13 SX patients underwent PET scanning for determination of
rest- and DIP-induced hyperemic blood flow on the same day.
Group B volunteers underwent rest and DIP studies on day 1 and rest and
CPT measurements on day 2 (random order). Group A volunteers underwent
measurements of myocardial blood flow at rest and after administration
of DIP. None of the healthy controls received any medication. All SX
patients stopped intake of medication before the study
(nitroglycerin 2 days, beta blockers 1 week,
calcium antagonists 3 weeks, and all other types of
medication stopped 1 week before the study). L-arginine
(300 g) was suspended in 500 mL saline to yield a concentration of 600
g/L. Infusion was performed with an automated infusion pump set at 11
mL/min. The amount given was therefore 6.7 g/min for a period of 45
minutes. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure
measurements were taken with an automated arm cuffbased device;
measurements were taken twice during the last 2 minutes of the
infusion, average values are reported. Myocardial perfusion was
corrected (MBF-RC) for changes in rate pressure product (RPP) by
the formula (MBF-RC=10.000x(Rest-MBF/RPP).
PET
The Siemens/CTI 961/0812 positron tomograph, which
simultaneously acquires 47 transaxial images, was used.
This scanner has an axial field of view of 15 cm, an intrinsic in-plane
spatial resolution of 5.5 mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM), and
an inter-plane spacing of 3.125 mm. The acquired images were
reconstructed using a Shepp filter with a cut-off frequency of 0.3
Nyquist, resulting in an effective in-plane resolution of 7
mm FWHM.
After performing a 15-minute transmission image to be able to
correct for photon attenuation, a 20 mL bolus of N-13 ammonia (20
mCi/740 MBq) was injected in a cubital vein over 30 s. Acquisition
of a dynamic imaging sequence was started simultaneously.
Fifty minutes (5 half-lives) were allowed for decay of the radiotracer
activity before the next image sequence was acquired. CPT was performed
using a container with ice water (
1°C). The subject's hand and
distal part of the forearm were submerged in the container. After
30 s, the imaging sequence was started. The hand was kept in ice
water for 90 s. Finally, after allowing another 50 minutes for
decay of the tracer, the third imaging sequence was acquired; this was
done after pharmacological vasodilatation was induced by
intravenous infusion of DIP for 4 minutes (0.56 mg ·
kg-1 · min-1).
Eight minutes after the DIP infusion was begun, the 20 mL N-13 ammonia
(20 mCi/740 MBq) bolus was injected and an identical imaging sequence
acquired. The dynamic imaging protocol consisted of twelve 10-s, two
30-s, one 60-s, and one 15-minute image (static image).
Throughout, the flow studies heart rate and blood pressure were measured approximately every 60 s. Continuous 12 lead ECG was monitored throughout the study. The rate pressure product was calculated as the average value of 2 measurements of heart rate and systolic blood pressure during the first 120 s of the image acquisition.
Quantification of Blood Flow
The sets of 47 transaxial images from the 16 frames were
reoriented into 12 short axis planes as described
previously.13 14 On the basis of the reoriented short axis
images, we generated polar maps of the N-13 ammonia activity
distribution and compared them to a database of normals. This was done
to ascertain that all participant were actually without any significant
coronary artery disease.15
MBF was quantified in the vascular territories most commonly supplied by the left anterior descending artery, left circumflex, and right coronary artery. Regions of interest were assigned to tissue areas representing the 3 vascular territories on 3 short axis images (one basal, one mid ventricular, and one apical image). The right ventricle insertion onto the septum was used as a guide to assure identical regions of interest in all studies.
For each of the 3 image sequences, a region of interest was centered in the left ventricular blood pool, one in each plane, to obtain 3 arterial input functions.16 The regions were then copied to the first 120 s of the dynamic imaging sequence to obtain tissue time activity curves for each region.
For each of the vascular territories the 3 tissue curves (basal, mid ventricular, and apical) were averaged and corrected for partial volume effects by assuming a uniform myocardial wall thickness of 1 cm.17 Both the blood pool and myocardial time activity curves were corrected for physical decay. Tissue time activity curves were then fitted with a previously validated 2 compartment model which corrects for spillover of activity from blood pool into left ventricular myocardium.13 18
Statistical Analysis
Mean values are given with their standard deviations. The
paired t test was used to determine differences within each
group. Unpaired t test with Bonferroni correction was used
to compare the 3 groups. P<0.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial Blood Flow and Myocardial Flow Reserve
Myocardial perfusion values are listed with the RPP
corrected values in the Table
and are depicted in Figures 1
and 2
.
Resting flow values were increased in the SX group compared with the
control group B (0.83±0.14 versus 0.66±0.14 mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P<0.01) but similar to the group A controls. MBF during CPT
was similar in SX patients and group B controls. Because MBF values at
rest and during CPT depend on cardiac work flow, rates were also
normalized to the RPP, a commonly used index of cardiac work. This
correction yielded similar flow results in both SX patients and
controls at rest and during CPT. However, DIP-induced hyperemic
flow was significantly lower in the SX group compared with both control
groups (1.68±0.49 versus 2.31±0.50 [A] and 2.16±0.55 [B] mL
· g-1 · min-1,
P<0.01). Consequently, the coronary flow reserve
(ratio between resting and hyperemic MBF) was significantly
decreased compared with the control group A (2.03±0.53 [SX] versus
2.96±0.63 [A] mL · g-1 ·
min-1, P<0.01). During DIP, the
reduced MBF remained lower after correction for RPP in the SX group
compared with both control groups.
|
|
|
Effect of L-arginine Supplementation
The concentration of L-arginine increased from
33±8 before infusion to 4278±1370 µmol/L during the last 2
minutes of the infusion. Myocardial perfusion was unchanged at rest
after infusion of L-arginine. Also, during CPT,
L-arginine did not significantly affect MBF (Figure 1
). Five patients complained of light nausea during
L-arginine infusion. Seven patients complained of headache
before the study, probably because of withdrawal symptoms from beta
blocker treatment. Six of these patients spontaneously reported fewer
symptoms after L-arginine infusion.
Coronary Vascular Resistance Index
To correct for potential differences in mean
arterial blood pressure, an index of coronary
vascular resistance (CVR) can be derived from the ratio between mean
arterial blood pressure (the driving pressure) and
myocardial blood flow and expressed in units of mm Hg ·
mL-1 · g-1
· min-1. The CVR index at rest did not differ
between SX patients and controls (107±19 [B] versus 104±18
[SX] mm Hg · mL-1 ·
g-1 · min-1;
P=NS). However, during DIP-induced hyperemia, the
drop in CVR observed in the control group was significantly attenuated
in the SX group (60±20 versus 38±10 [B] mm Hg ·
mL-1 · g-1
· min-1, P<0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial Blood Flow During DIP-Induced Hyperemia
We chose to achieve coronary vasodilation with DIP because
pharmacologically induced hyperemia is reduced specifically
with DIP, whereas adenosine and papaverine may yield preserved
CFR in patients with SX.19 In normal healthy controls, DIP
decreases coronary vascular resistance to about 30% of normal
resting values.20 The reduction induces reflex
tachycardia but has little effect on blood pressure. The SX
patients in this study had a normal hemodynamic
response to DIP infusion. However, in accordance with previous
studies,5 7 8 21 the flow increase was substantially
decreased and the resistance only declined to approximately 55% of
resting values.
DIP-induced coronary vasodilation is a result of an adenosine effect on resistance vessels mediated by inhibition of the reuptake of adenosine released by cardiac myocytes. Adenosine binds to A2 purinoceptors on the vascular smooth muscle cells, stimulating adenylate cyclase and increasing intracellular cAMP, which mediates smooth muscle relaxation. Papaverine is a nonspecific smooth muscle relaxant which acts predominantly by inhibiting cAMP phosphodiesterase.9 Because DIP, adenosine, and papaverine act differently on the cell, the impaired response to DIP could result from an abnormality of adenosine metabolism. It has been proposed that adenosine production is impaired in these patients.19 This mechanism would explain not only why DIP is a less effective vasodilator than exogenously administered adenosine but also why exercise and atrial pacing, dependent on adenosine mediated vasodilation, cause submaximal increases in MBF.
Several findings in the present study support the presence of a microvascular dysfunction involving abnormalities in adenosine metabolism in patients with SX: (1) basal MBF was elevated and unstimulated presence of adenosine was abnormally high, (2) CFR was reduced with DIP as the vasodilating agent, stimulated production of adenosine was abnormally low, and (3) none of the patients revealed metabolic evidence of myocardial ischemia during atrial pacing.
Our data therefore lend support to the hypothesis that an inappropriate, patchily distributed prearteriolar constriction or inadequate dilation may induce compensatory release and accumulation of adenosine, which reaches concentrations sufficient to stimulate cardiac afferent nerves.22 23 Even in the absence of ischemia, this mechanism can explain the heterogeneous findings in patients with SX. At one end of the spectrum, involvement of a considerable number of arterioles can explain the reduced CFR in some but not all patients with SX and the presence of myocardial ischemia in a few patients. At the other end, the involvement of a very limited number of arterioles can explain the occurrence of pain in the absence of detectable signs of ischemia, because adenosine in addition to its vasodilatory effect also is a well-known pain messenger.24 25 26 Finally, accumulation of adenosine in the extracellular compartment of the myocardium alters electrical conduction and causes electrocardiographic changes.41
The mechanisms responsible for the purported increase of the prearteriolar vasomotor tone cannot be identified with the results of the present study. Although an endothelium-dependent mechanism seems less likely, an increased sympathetic tone27 28 cannot be excluded and may gain support from the finding of increased RPP and increased resting myocardial blood flow in the patient group. In addition, abnormal responses to vasconstricor stimuli such as neuropeptide Y29 and endothelin30 31 have been demonstrated.
Effect of CPT and Influence of L-arginine
Supplementation
A selective impairment of the
endothelium-dependent microvascular vasodilation has
been proposed as a possible cause of reduced CFR.11 On the
basis of a documented close correlation between coronary sinus
blood flow and the response to acetylcholine and atrial pacing, this
study suggests that microvascular endothelial
dysfunction could play a central role in the reduction of the
CFR.6
Until now, impairment of endothelial-dependent microcirculatory vasodilation has been demonstrated using acetylcholine. Acetylcholine relaxes blood vessels by means of muscarinic receptors that stimulate the synthesis and release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor identical to NO. Acetylcholine has a dual effect on the vascular smooth muscle: it causes relaxation, which is strictly dependent on the presence of intact endothelium, and it also causes vasoconstriction which results from stimulation of specific muscarinic receptors located on the smooth muscle cells. The net resulting coronary vasomotor response depends on the balance between the 2 opposing effects. Therefore, an impaired response to acetylcholine may not only be attributable to impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation but also to enhanced smooth muscle cell muscarinic receptor response, altered signal transduction properties, or reduced production, release, or diffusion of NO.
In the present study, we sought to stimulate a physiological endothelium-dependent vasodilation specifically of the microvasculature using CPT. The rationale behind this approach was that the degree of microcirculatory vasoconstriction determines myocardial perfusion in the absence of epicardial stenoses. During CPT, the ensuing discomfort increases cardiac contractility and heart rate.32 Subsequent increases of shear stress stimulate the coronary endothelial cells to release NO, which mediates microcirculatory smooth muscle relaxation and increased perfusion, as also observed in the present study. The cold-induced vasodilation of normal coronary arteries is abolished by blocking NO with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) indicating that endothelial-derived NO accounts for vasodilation in response to CPT.33 In accordance with our findings, a preserved coronary vasodilator response to CPT has recently been demonstrated in patients with SX.34 The finding of a similar myocardial perfusion response to CPT in patients and controls indicates that SX-patients react adequately to the approximately 20% increase in RPP.
A defect in the enzymes catalyzing production of NO has been proposed as a possible pathological mechanism for the endothelium dependent dysfunction. NO is believed to play a central role in the regulation of coronary tone. NO is produced primarily in the endothelial cells, and release of NO is stimulated by several substances and shear stress.35 The substrate for NO production is L-arginine and the production is controlled primarily by 2 NO synthetase enzymes I-NOS and E-NOS.36 We found no alterations of resting perfusion following L-arginine supplementation. Therefore, decreased substrate delivery cannot constitute a pathophysiological mechanism in SX patients. Furthermore, L-arginine supplementation seems to be unable to increase the microcirculatory reactivity to endothelium stimulation. This is in contrast to the findings of Egashira et al, who have demonstrated an increased epicardial flow response to acethylcholine after treatment with L-arginine.37 Several explanations can be offered for these discrepancies. First of all, a different mode of stimulation has been used. Secondly, an increased flow rate in the epicardial vessels does not necessarily represent an increase in perfusion. The activation of epicardial vessel by stimulation with acetylcholine may also activate collateral circulation, which does not reflect true perfusion. Finally, differences in patients characteristics may account for the different results.
Methodological Considerations
Alterations of CFR must be interpreted with caution because CFR
can be reduced either by an elevation of basal coronary flow or
by a reduction of maximal hyperemic flow. Therefore, we
measured MBF by PET and present actual values of flow per unit mass
at rest, during CPT, and after DIP. Patients with SX had elevated MBF
at rest, but the reduced CFR was mainly caused by a reduction of the
actual increase in blood flow after DIP.
The coronary perfusion pressure influences maximal vasodilation. To correct for potential differences in blood pressure, we derived the CVR, which is useful for comparison of the study groups, when the blood pressure and RPP are different.
Limitations of the Study
The current study investigated only one regimen of
L-arginine administration, namely a 1-hour infusion of
30 g. Consequently, no dose-relationships could be established.
However, the dose is greater than or equal to the doses used in
invasive studies of endothelial
dysfunction37 38 The pharmacological regimen caused a
documented approximately 100-fold increase in the
L-arginine plasma concentration. Thus, it is unlikely that
an insufficient dose is responsible for the impaired increment of
perfusion after L-arginine in the patient group. A possible
study limitation is the fact that the L-arginine could have
affected the general ammonia handling to such an extend that the tracer
uptake used for quantification of flow had been altered. However, the 2
compartment ammonia flow model used has proven very robust to
metabolic changes in general and insensitive to changes in
insulin and glucose concentrations and pH.42
For ethical reasons our control group A did not undergo coronary arteriography. This procedure would enhance the probability that none of these controls had any significant coronary artery disease. If, however, any of the normal controls had coronary artery disease, it would tend to reduce the hyperemic response and, consequently, lead to less pronounced differences between the groups. In order to compensate for this, we included the control group B. This group has an extremely low risk of endothelial dysfunction and early signs of coronary artery disease.
Although our results are in accordance with a microvascular dysfunction involving adenosine metabolism, it must be noted that papaverine-induced vasodilation, which is independent on adenosine production, may be attenuated at least in a proportion of patients with SX.9 Furthermore, some patients with SX have evidence of coronary endothelial dysfunction together with myocardial ischemia.11 The extensive conflicting data in the literature reflect the heterogeneous nature of the disorder. We believe that SX encompasses several pathophysiological disease entities; these may even include disturbances without any evidence of vascular dysfunction, such as abnormal pain perception39 and disturbed electrolyte handling.40
We did not look at the effect of L-arginine on the DIP-induced flow increase. It could be argued that DIP response is a combined response of endothelium-dependent and -independent flow increase because the relaxation of the smooth muscle cells and the resultant flow increase would also stimulate the endothelium. However, the endothelium-dependent and -independent responses are not only of different mechanisms but also of very different magnitudes. Typical data would yield an increase in perfusion of approximately 15% to 25% after endothelium stimulation, whereas adenosine-mediated vasodilatation increases flow by 200% to 350%. In the most optimistic case, the full effect of the endothelium shear stress stimulation is activated during adenosine stimulation. In another very optimistic approach, the L-arginine increases the endothelium-dependent fraction of the flow increase by 50%. This would mean that flow increase would go up from 200% to 210%, a 5% increase. Given the individual variation with standard deviations in the 15% range, a simple sample size calculation (power 80%, alpha 0.05) yields a minimal sample size of 73; in light of these very optimistic presumptions, we found this to be unrealistic.
Clinical Implications
Our study supports the hypothesis that the microcirculation is
abnormal. The abnormality is independent of the
endothelial function in patients with SX. The
fundamental underlying mechanism is not clear but does not involve
myocardial ischemia in most cases. The abnormality seem to
involve adenosine metabolism, providing a rationale
for treatment with antagonists of adenosine
receptors, eg, aminophylline.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 16, 1998; revision received December 29, 1998; accepted December 29, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Cannon RO, Epstein SE. "Microvascular angina" as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:13381343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Camici PG, Marraccini P, Lorenzoni R, Buzzigoli G, Pecori N, Perissinotto A, Ferrannini E, L'Abbate A, Marzilli M. Coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in patients with syndrome X: response to pacing stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:14611470.[Abstract]
4. Nihoyannopoulos P, Kaski JC, Crake T, Maseri A. Absence of myocardial dysfunction during stress in patients with syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:14631470.[Abstract]
5. Botker HE, Sonne HS, Bagger JP, Nielsen TT. Impact of impaired coronary flow reserve and insulin resistance on myocardial energy metabolism in patients with syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:16151622.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO 3d, Panza JA, Diodati JG,
Epstein SE. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with
chest pain and normal coronary arteries.
Circulation. 1992;86:18641871.
7. Geltman EM, Henes CG, Senneff MJ, Sobel BE, Bergmann SR. Increased myocardial perfusion at rest and diminished perfusion reserve in patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:586595.[Abstract]
8. Galassi AR, Crea F, Araujo LI, Lammertsma AA, Pupita G, Yamamoto Y, Rechavia E, Jones T, Kaski JC, Maseri A. Comparison of regional myocardial blood flow in syndrome X and one-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:134139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Chauhan A, Mullins PA, Petch MC, Schofield PM. Is
coronary flow reserve in response to papaverine really normal
in syndrome X? Circulation. 1994;89:19982004.
10. Botker HE, Moller N, Ovesen P, Mengel A, Schmitz O, Orskov H, Bagger JP. Insulin resistance in microvascular angina (syndrome X). Lancet. 1993;342:136140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y, Yamada A, Urabe Y,
Takeshita A. Evidence of impaired endothelium-dependent
coronary vasodilatation in patients with angina pectoris and
normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:16591664.
12.
Bottcher M, Czernin J, Sun KT, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR.
Effect of caffeine on myocardial blood flow at rest and during
pharmacological vasodilation. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:20162021.
13.
Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, Buxton D, Gambhir SS,
Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional
myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron
emission tomographic imaging. Circulation. 1992;86:10041017.
14.
Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang SC, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR.
Issues in the quantitation of reoriented cardiac PET images.
J Nucl Med. 1992;33:12351242.
15.
Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RL, Mullani
NA, Smalling RW, Nishikawa A, Merhige ME. Assessment of
coronary artery disease severity by positron emission
tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients.
Circulation. 1989;79:825835.
16.
Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G,
Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of
age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow
reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:6269.
17. Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:299308.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Krivokapich J, Smith GT, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Ratib O,
Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. 13N ammonia myocardial imaging at rest and
with exercise in normal volunteers. Quantification of absolute
myocardial perfusion with dynamic positron emission tomography.
Circulation. 1989;80:13281337.
19.
Holdright DR, Lindsay DC, Clarke D, Fox K, Poole Wilson
PA, Collins P. Coronary flow reserve in patients with chest
pain and normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J. 1993;70:513519.
20.
Bottcher M, Czernin J, Sun KT, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR.
Effect of B-1 adrenoceptor blockade on myocardial blood flow and
vasodilatory capacity. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:442446.
21.
Cannon RO, Schenke WH, Leon MB, Rosing DR, Urquhart J,
Epstein SE. Limited coronary flow reserve after
dipyridamole in patients with ergonovine-induced
coronary constriction. Circulation. 1987;75:163174.
22. Maseri A, Crea F, Kaski JC, Crake T. Mechanisms of angina pectoris in syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:499506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Meeder JG, Blanksma PK, Crijns HJ, Anthonio RL, Pruim
J, Brouwer J, de Jong RM, van der Wall EE, Vaalburg W, Lie KI.
Mechanisms of angina pectoris in syndrome X assessed by myocardial
perfusion dynamics and heart rate variability. Eur Heart
J. 1995;16:15711577.
24. Sylvén C, Beerman B, Jonzon B, Brandt R. Angina pectoris-like pain provoked by intravenous adenosine in healthy volunteers. BMJ. 1986;293:227230.
25.
Lagerquist B, Sylvén C, Beerman B, Helmius G,
Waldenström A. Intracoronary adenosine causes
angina pectoris like pain- and inquiry into the nature of visceral
pain. Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:609613.
26. Sylvén C. Mechanisms of pain in angina pectorisa critical review of the adenosine hypothesis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1993;7:745759.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, Annoni L, Polese A, De Cesare N, Guazzi MD. Coronary adrenergic hyperreactivity in patients with syndrome X and abnormal electrocardiogram at rest. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:16981703.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Rosano GMC, Ponikowski P, Adamopopoulos S, Collins P, Poole-Wilson PA, Coats AJS, Kaski JC. Abnormal autonomic control of the cardiovascular system in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:11741179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kaski JC, Tousoulis D, Rosano GMC, Clarke J, Davies GJ. Role of neuropeptide Y in pathognesis of syndrome X. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:103108.
30.
Kaski JC, Elliot PM, Salomone OA, Dickinson K, Gordon
D, Hann C, Holt D. Concentration of circulating plasma endothelin in
patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms. Br
Heart J. 1995;74:620624.
31.
Newby DE, Flint LL, Fox KAA, Boon NA, Webb DJ. Reduced
responsiveness to endothelin-1 in peripheral resistance
vessels of patients with syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:15851590.
32.
Campisi R, Czernin J, Schöder H, Sayre JW,
Marengo FD, Phelps M, Schelbert HR. Effect of long-term smoking on
myocardial blood flow, coronary vasomotion, and vasodilator
capacity. Circulation. 1998;98:119125.
33. Tousoulis D, Tentolouris C, Habib F, Crake T, Davies GJ, Toutouzas P. Effects of inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis during cold pressor test in epicardial coronary arteries. Circulation. 1995;92:I-429. Abstract.
34. Meeder JG, Blanksma PK, van der Wall EE, Willemsen AT, Pruim J, Anthonio RL, de Jong RM, Vaalburg W, Lie KI. Coronary vasomotion in patients with syndrome X: evaluation with positron emission tomography and parametric myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:530537.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Palmer RM, Ferrige AG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature. 1987;327:524526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Palmer RM, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature. 1988;333:664666.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kuga T, Mohri M, Takeshita A.
Effects of L-arginine supplementation on
endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in
patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms.
Circulation. 1996;94:130134.
38. Hirooka Y, Egashira K, Imaizumi T, Tagawa T, Kai H, Sugimachi M, Takeshita A. Effect of L-arginine on acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation differs between the coronary and forearm vasculatures in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:948955.[Abstract]
39. Cannon RO, Quyyumi AA, Schenke WH, Fananapazir L, Tucker EE, Gaughan AM, Gracely RH, Cattau EL, Epstein SE. Abnormal cardiac sensitivity patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:13591366.[Abstract]
40.
Koren W, Koldanov R, Peleg E, Rabinowitz B,
Rosenthal T. Enhanced red cell sodium-hydrogen exchange in
microvascular angina. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:12961299.
41.
Lerman BB, Belardinelli L. Cardiac
electrophysiology of adenosine. Basic and clinical concepts.
Circulation. 1991;83:14991509.
42.
Schelbert HR, PhelpsME, Huang SC, MacDonald
NS, Hansen H, Selin C, Kuhl DE. N-13 ammonia as an indicator of
myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1981;63:12591272.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A Di Monaco, I Bruno, A Sestito, P Lamendola, L Barone, A Bagnato, R Nerla, C Pisanello, A Giordano, G A Lanza, et al. Cardiac adrenergic nerve function and microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 550 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Crea, P. G. Camici, R. De Caterina, and G. A. Lanza CHAPTER 17 Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Lanza, A. Buffon, A. Sestito, L. Natale, G. A. Sgueglia, L. Galiuto, F. Infusino, L. Mariani, A. Centola, and F. Crea Relation between stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 29, 2008; 51(4): 466 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A.C. Vermeltfoort, O. Bondarenko, P. G.H.M. Raijmakers, D. A.M. Odekerken, A. F.M. Kuijper, A. Zwijnenburg, M. J.E. van der Vis-Melsen, J. W.R. Twisk, A. M. Beek, G. J.J. Teule, et al. Is subendocardial ischaemia present in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms? A cardiovascular MR study Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1554 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Siegrist, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, T. Schepis, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, F. Aiello, S. Fleischmann, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Repeatability of Cold Pressor Test-Induced Flow Increase Assessed with H215O and PET J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1420 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Pepine, R. A. Kerensky, C. R. Lambert, K. M. Smith, G. O. von Mering, G. Sopko, and C. N. Bairey Merz Some Thoughts on the Vasculopathy of Women With Ischemic Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S30 - S35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Gornik and M. A. Creager Arginine and Endothelial and Vascular Health J. Nutr., October 1, 2004; 134(10): 2880S - 2887S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Kidawa, M Krzeminska-Pakula, J Z Peruga, and J D Kasprzak Arterial dysfunction in syndrome X: results of arterial reactivity and pulse wave propagation tests Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 422 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Piatti, G. Fragasso, L. D. Monti, E. Setola, P. Lucotti, I. Fermo, R. Paroni, E. Galluccio, G. Pozza, S. Chierchia, et al. Acute Intravenous l-Arginine Infusion Decreases Endothelin-1 Levels and Improves Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Arteriograms: Correlation With Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Levels Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Kaski Overview of gender aspects of cardiac syndrome X Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 620 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Frohlich Local Hemodynamic Changes in Hypertension: Insights for Therapeutic Preservation of Target Organs Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1388 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D Frohlich Review: Promise of prevention and reversal of target organ involvement in hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S4 - S9. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bottcher, M. M. Madsen, J. Refsgaard, N. H. Buus, I. Dorup, T. T. Nielsen, and K. Sorensen Peripheral Flow Response to Transient Arterial Forearm Occlusion Does Not Reflect Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Circulation, February 27, 2001; 103(8): 1109 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Rosen, P. G. Camici, M. Bottcher, H. E. Botker, H. Sonne, T. T. Nielsen, and J. Czernin Endothelium-Dependent and -Independent Perfusion Reserve and the Effect of L-Arginine on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Syndrome X Response Circulation, May 30, 2000; 101 (21): e205 - e206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Frohlich Risk Mechanisms in Hypertensive Heart Disease Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 782 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |