Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:2231-2238

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology

(Circulation. 1999;99:2231-2238.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Quantifying GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Binding Using 2 Monoclonal Antibodies

Discriminating Abciximab and Small Molecular Weight Antagonists

Martin Quinn, MB, BCh, BAO, MRCPI; Adele Deering; Maura Stewart, BSc; Dermot Cox, PhD; Brendan Foley, MD, MRCPI, FRCPC; Desmond Fitzgerald, MD, FRCPI

From the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (M.Q., A.D., M.S., D.C., D.F.), The Royal College of Surgeons, and St. James's Hospital (B.F.), Dublin, Ireland.

Correspondence to Dr Martin Quinn, The Centre for Cardiovascular Science, 123, St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. E-mail mquinn{at}rcsi.ie


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowStatistical Analysis
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Dosing of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is frequently based on the inhibition of platelet aggregation, which may be influenced by the agonist used or concurrent medications. Here we describe a monoclonal antibody-based technique to quantify total and ligand-occupied GPIIb/IIIa receptors.

Methods and Results—In vitro binding of monoclonal antibodies, LYP18 (Mab1) and 4F8 (Mab2), to the GPIIb/IIIa complex, was characterized using purified receptor and to platelets by flow cytometry. Patients undergoing coronary angioplasty received a single 20 mg dose of the oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, xemilofiban, or matching placebo, and antibody binding was compared with inhibition of platelet aggregation. Mab1 and Mab2 were bound to purified GPIIb/IIIa and to unoccupied, inactivated receptor on platelets. Mab2 identified the ß3 subunit, whereas Mab1 was complex-specific. Neither antibody interfered with the other's binding, suggesting that they identified distinct sites. Mab1 identified 53 300±5423 GPIIb/IIIa sites per platelet, whereas Mab2 identified 50 120±5066 sites per platelet. Mab1 binding was inhibited by abciximab in a dose dependent manner (IC50, 0.85±0.1 µg/mL), whereas Mab2 binding was unaffected. In contrast, the 2 small molecular weight antagonists, SC-57101A (IC50, 0.22±0.06 µmol/L) and eptifibatide (IC50, 0.35±0.14 µmol/L) inhibited Mab2 but not Mab1 binding. In patients treated with xemilofiban, Mab1 binding was unaltered but Mab2 binding decreased from 37 930±2061 sites per platelet at baseline to 8318±870 sites per platelet 6 hours after dosing (P<0.0001). Platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (20 µmol/L) fell to 3±3% of baseline in line with the inhibition of Mab2 binding (correlation coefficient 0.8, P<0.0001).

Conclusions—Mab1 and Mab2 bind to GPIIb/IIIa and are differentially displaced by abciximab and small molecular weight antagonists. These antibodies may be used to monitor receptor number and occupancy during administration of a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist.


Key Words: glycoproteins • platelet aggregation inhibitors • abciximab • thrombosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowStatistical Analysis
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa is one of a family of integrins that are heterodimers of an {alpha} and ß subunit and act as receptors for adhesion proteins.1 GPIIb/IIIa is the principle integrin on platelets and is the receptor for fibrinogen, which mediates platelet aggregation and adhesion. Antagonists of GPIIb/IIIa, including the monoclonal antibody abciximab2 and several peptide (eg, eptifibatide)3 and nonpeptide small molecules,4 are potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation; given as short-term infusions, they reduce the complications of coronary angioplasty when combined with aspirin.5 6 7 8 Orally active agents have also been developed9 that will hopefully extend the use of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists to long-term therapy for patients with stable coronary disease.

Currently, dosing of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is based on the inhibition of platelet aggregation. This has several disadvantages. Platelet aggregation may vary depending on the agonist used, the platelet count, ingestion of food or alcohol, smoking, and the use of concurrent medications.10 11 12 Platelet aggregation is also insensitive to very high or low levels of receptor occupancy. Aggregation reflects cross-linking of GPIIb/IIIa receptors from adjacent platelets and is unaffected at levels of receptor occupancy <30% to 50%.13 Similarly, as receptor occupancy exceeds 80%, aggregation may be completely inhibited despite the presence of unoccupied receptors. The inhibition of residual unoccupied receptors may have functional effects as evidenced by a further increase in bleeding time with levels of occupancy >80%.14

Here, we describe the binding of 2 monoclonal antibodies to the platelet GPIIb/IIIa, LYP18 (Mab1), previously characterized to bind to the ligand recognition site and to be complex specific,15 and 4F8 (Mab2). Binding of these antibodies can be used in a flow cytometric assay to directly quantify occupied and unoccupied GPIIb/IIIa. We also present data on the application of this assay following administration of an oral GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist. This approach may be useful in monitoring drug effects and to follow receptor density in patients on long-term therapy with GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowStatistical Analysis
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Monoclonal Antibodies
Monoclonal antibody 1 (Mab1, clone LYP18), a murine monoclonal antibody to the GPIIb/IIIa complex; monoclonal antibody 2 (Mab2, clone 4F8), a murine monoclonal antibody to the beta III subunit; isotypic control; fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled F(ab')2 fragments of human Ig absorbed, sheep anti-mouse IgG antibodies; and calibration beads with 4 different known amounts of antibody per bead were provided by Dr M Canton (Biocytex, Marseille, France). SC-57101A (a HCl salt of the active component of the oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, orbofiban) and H3SC- 52021B, a radiolabeled GPIIb/IIIa ligand,16 were gifts of Dr Robert Anders (J.D. Searle, Skokie, Ill). Eptifibatide was a gift of Dr David Phillips (Cor Therapeutics, San Francisco, Calif). The monoclonal antibody abciximab was purchased from Eli Lilly and Co, Ind. GPIIb/IIIa was purified according to the protocol of Phillips et al.17 Ligand dilutions were performed in PBS.

Ligand Binding Studies
Nine parts blood from healthy donors, who had not taken aspirin or any other anti-platelet agent in the previous 7 days, was collected to one part sodium citrate (3.8%). This was centrifuged at 150g for 10 minutes and the platelet rich plasma (PRP) was aspirated. PRP was diluted to 1x 107 platelets/mL with PBS and incubated with different concentrations of ligand for 30 minutes at room temperature. Aliquots of each dilution were incubated with Mab1 or Mab2 (10 µg/mL) at room temperature for 20 minutes. Antibody binding was determined using fluorescein isothyocyanate (FITC) labeled F(ab)2 fragments of human Ig absorbed, sheep anti-mouse IgG(H+L) antibodies. The samples were fixed with 1 mL of 1% formaldehyde after 10 minutes incubation and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton Dickinson) at 488 nm excitation. Platelet populations were gated according to their forward and side light scatter. Histograms were generated using 10 000 counts, and geometric mean fluorescence was calculated using the CELLQUEST software of the FACScan system (Becton Dickenson). The binding of an isotypic control antibody was taken as nonspecific binding and was subtracted from the observed geometric mean fluorescence.

Calibration beads, consisting of a mixture of 4 different populations of 2-µm diameter latex beads, each with a different defined amount of murine antibody per bead, were used to estimate the number of antibodies bound per platelet, similar to the method described by Poncelet et al.18 The beads were analyzed in parallel with the samples, with the same FITC reagent and the same settings as the samples. The singlet bead populations were gated according to their forward and side scatter. Histograms of the geometric mean fluorescence intensity of 10 000 events were recorded and used to plot a log-log graph of the mean fluorescence intensity versus the number of antibodies attached to each bead. The number of platelet-bound Mab1 and Mab2 molecules was estimated from this graph on the basis of the geometric mean fluorescence intensity of the sample. After subtraction of nonspecific binding and assuming monovalent binding, the number of specifically bound antibody molecules was taken as the number of bound sites for either Mab1 or Mab2.

In additional experiments, we examined competition of Mab1 or Mab2 for each other's binding site using FITC labeled Mab1 and Mab2. PRP was incubated with Mab1, Mab2, or isotypic control for 20 minutes. FITC-labeled Mab1 or Mab2 was then added and incubated for 10 minutes and analyzed on the flow cytometer.

Platelet Aggregation
For ex vivo platelet aggregation studies, blood was collected in 3.8% sodium citrate at a final dilution of 1:10 and was centrifuged at 850g for 3 minutes to procure PRP. Following PRP removal, the remaining plasma was centrifuged at 2500g for 5 minutes to obtain platelet poor plasma. Platelet aggregation was studied following the addition of adenosine diphosphate (20 µmol/L) to PRP at 37°C by light transmission (Biodata PAP-4, Biodata Corporation). Aggregation was not adjusted for the platelet count of each sample; however, the aggregation at the different time-points was expressed as a percentage of baseline aggregation, before administration of the drug. There was no significant difference in whole blood platelet count at the different time-points with a mean±SEM (x103/µL) of 213±16 at baseline, 201±10 preprocedure, 215±13 post procedure and 189±9 at the 6 hour time-point.

3HSC- 52021B-Binding
3HSC- 52021B is a triatiated form of a potent benzamidine GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist.16 Earlier experiments (not shown) demonstrated that 3HSC-52021B binds in a dose-dependent saturable manner in whole blood from healthy volunteer donors, with a Kd of 93.4 nmol/L. Ligand binding was determined using a modification of the technique described by Wang et al.19 Whole blood was incubated with a 3HSC-52021B (5 nmol/L) for 30 minutes. Bound ligand was separated from unbound using a cell harvester (Brandel Inc). Each sample was eluted through Whatmann GFB microfiber filters (Whatmann International Ltd) with 3.5 mL of Tris (10 mmol/L) buffer at 4°C. The filters were washed 3 times with 3.5 mL of ice-cold buffer and placed in scintillation fluid (Ecoscint A, National Diagnostics). Filters were analyzed using a scintillation counter (Wallac, 1214 RACKBETA). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate with one aliquot containing excess unlabelled compound (500 µmol/L). This was taken to represent nonspecific binding. Results are expressed as the percentage of baseline radioactivity before administration of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist.

Ex Vivo Studies
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Irish Medicines Board and the Ethics Committee at St. James's Hospital and all patients gave written, informed consent.

Blood samples were drawn, into 3.8% sodium citrate, from patients receiving a single dose of the oral GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, xemilofiban 20 mg, or a matching placebo administered in a randomized, blinded fashion 30 to 90 minutes before coronary balloon angioplasty or stent placement. All patients received aspirin (150 to 300 mg) before the procedure and heparin at the time of intervention to achieve an ACT of >300 s. Blood sampling was performed from a peripheral vein at baseline before administration of the drug. The intervention was performed no sooner than 30 minutes but within 90 minutes of randomized drug administration. Blood samples were obtained again from the femoral venous sheath after insertion and immediately postangioplasty, discarding the initial 5 mL of blood in each case. Peripheral venous blood was also obtained just before the next dose of study medication, 4 to 7 hours following the initial dose. Samples were collected into 3.8% sodium citrate for platelet studies. Platelet aggregation studies and monoclonal antibody binding by flow cytometry were performed within 2 hours of blood sampling. 3HSC-52021B binding studies were performed within 24 hours. Previous experiments had confirmed stability of the 3HSC- 52021B binding assay for up to 7 days, when samples were stored at 4°C (data not shown). For Mab1 and Mab2 binding, whole blood was diluted 1 in 4 with platelet poor plasma from the corresponding aggregation studies at each time-point. This was performed in order to ensure that Mab1 and Mab2 (5 µg/mL) were at saturating concentrations. Platelet poor plasma is used to prevent dilution of the ligand. Diluted samples were incubated with antibody for 20 minutes at room temperature, stained with secondary antibody, and analyzed by flow cytometry.


*    Statistical Analysis
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Statistical Analysis
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Continuous data are presented as mean±SEM. Clinical data from xemilofiban- and placebo-treated patients was compared by ANOVA. Within the groups of treated and untreated patients, data from the different time-points was compared by an initial ANOVA with subsequent Dunnett's t test (when P<0.05) to compare each time-point to baseline. Percent of baseline Mab2 binding and percent of baseline aggregation were correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficient.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowStatistical Analysis
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Binding of Mab1 and Mab2 to GPIIb/IIIa
Mab1 and Mab2 were bound to purified GPIIb/IIIa in a dot blot assay, where no binding was detected with an isotypic antibody. Following protein gel electrophoresis of the purified receptor (performed under reducing conditions), Mab2 identified GPIIb/IIIa, binding to the ß3 subunit (Figure 1Down). As Mab1 binding is complex specific,15 it did not identify the receptor under these reducing conditions.



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Protein gel electrophoresis of purified GPIIb/IIIa under reducing conditions (left) and western blotting with Mab1 and Mab2 (right). Mab1 fails to recognize the purified protein on the gel, as its epitope is complex specific. Mab2 binds to the ß subunit under these reducing conditions.

Binding of Mab1 and Mab2 to Platelets In Vitro
In undiluted PRP and in PRP diluted to 1x107 platelets/mL from healthy donors, Mab1 and Mab2 bound in a concentration-dependent and saturable manner. Mab1 had a slightly lower affinity than Mab2 with Kd of 5.3±1.3 µg/mL and 3.8±1.1 µg/mL (n=3), respectively, in PRP and 1.52±1.4 µg/mL and 1.4±1.5 µg/mL (n=3), respectively, in PRP diluted to 1x107/mL (Figure 2Down). Maximum binding occurred at 6 µg/mL in dilute PRP and at 15 µg/mL in undiluted PRP. Mab1 identified a mean of 53 300±5423 GPIIb/IIIa receptors sites per platelet at maximum binding. The number of sites determined by Mab2 was slightly lower at 50 120±5066 sites. Mab1 binding was reduced to background fluorescence in platelet preparations incubated with EDTA (10 mmol/L at 37°C for 30 minutes), whereas Mab2 binding was reduced but was not completely abolished and the antibody still recognized 13 041±577 sites per platelet. In competition studies using FITC-labeled Mab1 and Mab2, Mab1 did not interfere with Mab2 binding and Mab2 did not inhibit Mab1 binding, suggesting that they bind to separate sites (Figure 3Down).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Binding of Mab1 ({diamondsuit}) and Mab2 ({square}) to platelets. PRP was diluted to 1x107 platelets/mL and incubated with increasing concentrations of antibody. Mab2 binds with a Kd of 1.4±1.5 µg/mL and recognizes 50 120±5066 sites at saturation, whereas Mab1 binds with a Kd of 1.52±1.4 µg/mL and recognizes a maximum of 53 300±5423 sites.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Histogram of mean fluorescence intensities of FITC-labeled Mab1 and Mab2 binding in flow cytometric competition assays. A, Incubation with isotypic control before addition of FITC-Mab1 (solid histogram) or FITC-Mab2 (open histogram) did not effect binding of FITC-Mab1 or FITC-Mab2. B, Initial incubation with unlabeled Mab2 reduced FITC-Mab2 binding but did not effect FITC-Mab1 binding. C, Initial incubation with unlabelled Mab1 reduced FITC-Mab1 binding but did not effect FITC- Mab2' binding.

Repeated analysis of a sample from a single donor drawn at the same time revealed a coefficient of variation of 0.55% for Mab1 and 1.3% for Mab2 in the number of sites identified. Analysis of samples from 4 different healthy donors revealed a range for Mab1 binding of 35 815 to 47 721 and of 35 175 to 42 556 for Mab2. Reanalysis of samples from the same healthy donors one month later revealed a mean coefficient of variation of 14% for the number of sites identified by Mab1 and 5.4% for Mab2.

Displacement of Mab1 and Mab2 by Antagonists to the Platelet GPIIb/IIIa In Vitro
Abciximab inhibited Mab1 binding in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 of 0.85±0.1 µg/mL, reducing the number of binding sites for Mab1 from a maximum of 49 691±1016 in the absence of abciximab to 1297±154 sites at 10 µg/mL (Figure 4Down). The number of binding sites detected by Mab2 remained constant at a mean of 47 874±746 sites per platelet. In contrast, the synthetic ligand eptifibatide displaced Mab2 in a dose-dependent manner (IC50, 0.35±0.14 µmol/L) and had little effect on Mab1 binding. Increasing concentrations of eptifibatide reduced Mab2 binding to 7455±1173 sites from a maximum of 44 328±2033 sites, whereas Mab1 binding remained constant at 50 412±480 sites. Similarly, SC-57101A (IC50, 0.22±0.06 µmol/L), reduced Mab2 binding to a minimum of 9118± 1,835 sites at a concentration of 30 µmol/L from a maximum of 43 182±2373, whereas Mab1 binding remained constant at a mean of 54 109±2605.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The effect of abciximab and eptifibatide on Mab1 ({diamondsuit}) and Mab2 ({square}) binding to platelets in vitro. Abciximab (top) reduces Mab1 binding in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 0.85±0.1 µg/mL, whereas Mab2 binding is unaffected. In contrast, eptifibatide (bottom) inhibits Mab2 binding with an IC50 of 0.35±0.14 µmol/L but does not effect Mab1 binding.

To determine the time course of displacement of the ligand by the antibodies, samples were spiked with abciximab (1.5 µg/mL) and stored at 4°C. Mab1 and Mab2 binding remained constant for over 2 hours in unfixed dilute PRP. Mab1 binding progressively increased after 2 hours, indicating displacement of the abciximab from its binding site, whereas Mab2 binding remained constant. In dilute unfixed PRP incubated with eptifibatide (12.5x10-6M) or Sc-57101A (6.3x10-6M), Mab2 binding increased after 2 hours indicating the displacement of ligand. Fixing samples in 1% formaldehyde, after incubation with Mab1 and Mab2 prevented this displacement, and binding remained constant for up to 15 days (data not shown).

Clinical Studies
Figure 5Down shows the effect of xemilofiban (20 mg) or placebo on platelet aggregation, 3HSC-52021B binding and number of sites detected by Mab1 and Mab2. In patients receiving placebo (n=7), Mab2 binding remained stable with 44 652±4189 sites, 38 013±2681 sites, and 40 047±1986 sites detected preprocedure, postprocedure, and at 6 hours, respectively (P=0.41). The corresponding number of sites identified by Mab1 were 59 230±4892, 56 679±5332, and 56 955±4537 at each time-point (P=0.98). Platelet aggregation was largely unchanged at 94±4%, 87±6%, and 97±2%, at the corresponding time points (P=0.15). Similarly, radioligand binding was uninhibited at 123±24% preprocedure, 162±24% postprocedure, and 115±8% at 6 hours (P=0.12).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Mab1 (solid), Mab2 (open), platelet aggregation (striped), and radiolabeled ligand (stippled) binding expressed as a percent of baseline in patients receiving xemilofiban 20 mg (top) or placebo (bottom). In patients receiving xemilofiban, Mab2 binding decreases over time as the drug is absorbed and corresponds to the reduction in platelet aggregation and radioligand binding.

In patients receiving xemilofiban (n=9), there was significant inhibition of platelet aggregation, radiolabeled ligand binding, and Mab2 binding (P<0.002). This occurred progressively over the period of observation, which is consistent with a peak plasma concentration of 2 to 6 hours.20 At baseline, Mab1 and 2 identified 50 910±1932 and 37 930±2061 sites per platelet, respectively. Mab1 binding was unchanged following drug at 50 795±2808 sites just before the procedure, 50 260±2737 immediately postprocedure, and 48 485±3228 sites at the 6-hour time-point (P=0.92). In contrast, Mab2 binding decreased to 19 540±4819 (51% of baseline) sites just before the procedure, 13 373±4866 (32% of baseline) immediately postprocedure (at an average of 92 minutes after the initial drug dose), and reached a minimum at the 6-hour time-point of 8318±870 sites per platelet before the next dose of drug (P<0.0001). Aggregation was reduced to 61±8%, 30±15%, and 3±3% of baseline at the corresponding time-points (P<0.0001). Radioligand binding was also inhibited to 79±20% before the procedure, 77±16% immediately postprocedure, and 57±10% at 6 hours (P<0.05 for postprocedure and 6-hour sample compared with baseline). Mab2 expressed as a percent of baseline correlated with platelet aggregation, also expressed as a percent of baseline (r=0.8; P<0.0001, Figure 6Down).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Percent of baseline Mab2 binding plotted against the percent of baseline platelet aggregation. The inhibition of Mab2 binding correlates with the inhibition of platelet aggregation with a correlation coefficient of 0.8, P<0.00001.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowStatistical Analysis
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Binding of Mab1 and Mab2 to GPIIb/IIIa
Previous studies have shown that Mab1 binds to GPIIb/IIIa on platelets and the vitronectin receptor, {alpha}vß3, on endothelial and melanoma cells.21 22 23 Its binding to GPIIb/IIIa requires an intact heterodimer because it fails to bind to either subunit under reducing conditions or in crossed immunoelectrophoresis.15 The binding site is at or close to the ligand recognition sites of GPIIb/IIIa, as Mab1 inhibits fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. Mab2 binds to the ß3 subunit of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa, but further characterization is required to define the precise epitope. Mab2 recognizes the receptor under reducing conditions, suggesting that it recognizes a linear epitope. This may explain the continued recognition of the epitope when the receptor complex is disrupted by chelating Ca2+. Mab2 also binds to endothelial cells. This is consistent with its epitope also being present on the ß3 subunit of the vitronectin receptor {alpha}vß3 (data not shown).

Differential Displacement of Mab1 and Mab2 Binding to Platelets by Antagonists
Both antibodies bound to platelets in a concentration dependent and saturable manner with equivalent affinities. The number of sites identified by the antibodies is consistent with previously reported numbers of GPIIb/IIIa receptors per platelet identified by bivalent monoclonal antibodies and labeled fibrinogen binding.24 25 26 27 28 However, it is possible that our antibodies underestimate the true number of receptors per platelet; Wagner et al have demonstrated discrepancy between bivalent and monovalent antibody binding.29 This will not, though, effect the ability of the assay to estimate the percentage occupancy. On whole platelets, Mab1 binding was displaced entirely by disruption of the complex using EDTA and by the monoclonal antibody, abciximab. Abciximab is directed at the fibrinogen binding site and prevents fibrinogen binding, platelet aggregation, and platelet adhesion.30 31 In contrast, abciximab had no effect on Mab2 binding, even at very high concentrations. This suggests that the Mab1 and Mab2 recognize different epitopes. Indeed, using prelabeled Mab1 and Mab2, we have shown that the antibodies did not compete with each other for binding, again suggesting that they identified different epitopes.

In contrast to abciximab, 2 small molecule antagonists, the peptide eptifibatide and the nonpeptide SC-57101A, displaced Mab2 but not Mab1. It is not clear why these compounds failed to displace Mab1. As with abciximab, SC-57101A and eptifibatide prevent platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding, suggesting that they bind at or close to the ligand recognition site. However, there may be differences in the regions recognized by antagonists despite their similar effects on fibrinogen binding. Cross-linking studies using iodinated GPIIb/IIIa antagonists KYGRGDS and the cyclic compound, KYGC(s-s)HarGDWPC(s-s) show that these compounds cross-link to different sites on the ß3 subunit.32 Thus, antagonists may differ in where they bind within the active pocket and this may explain the differential displacement of Mab1 binding.

Similarly, it is unclear why some compounds and not others displace Mab2. Mab2 binding does not interfere with the binding of the radiolabeled GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, 3HSC-52021B,33 in contrast with Mab1, suggesting that Mab2 identifies a site remote from the active site and remote from where antagonists bind. Therefore, reduction of Mab2 binding may not reflect a direct interaction between antibody and antagonist. The displacement of Mab2 may be the result of a conformational change in the receptor with a loss or attenuation of the epitope recognized by the antibody. Ligand binding is known to induce conformational changes in the GPIIb/IIIa, usually detected as the expression of neoepitopes.34 Ligand attenuation of a binding site or epitope has also been described in the fibronectin receptor ({alpha}5ß1), where the epitope is present on unbound receptors but disappears from ligand bound receptors.35

Assay of Total and Occupied GPIIb/IIIa
The differential displacement of the 2 monoclonal antibodies to the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, Mab1 and Mab2, by abciximab and the synthetic GPIIb/IIIa antagonists provides a means of calculating total receptor number and receptor occupancy by GPIIb/IIIa ligand. This may be useful in following the receptor-ligand interaction, as demonstrated in our patient population. The differential effects of the compounds may also be applied to monitor drug receptor interactions following oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in patients previously treated with abciximab. Currently available methods to assess the biological activity of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists are limited by their inability to differentiate between receptor inhibition by abciximab and small molecular weight antagonists.36 37 This is important as abciximab can remain bound to platelets for days following a single administration, enhancing the effects of oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.10 Finally, by estimating total as well as bound receptors, this assay provides a means to follow receptor kinetics during long-term drug administration. Thus, changes in receptor number as a result of ligand occupancy or following drug withdrawal may be detected.

In conclusion, Mab1 and Mab2 are 2 monoclonal antibodies that bind to different epitopes of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa and are differentially displaced by abciximab and the small molecule antagonists, eptifibatide, xemilofiban, and SC-57101a. The displacement of Mab1 and Mab2 may be used to monitor drug receptor interactions in vivo and potentially to discriminate between the effects of abciximab and other antagonists in man.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust, the Charitable Infirmary Charitable Trust, and the Health Research Board of Ireland.

Received June 1, 1998; revision received February 9, 1999; accepted February 10, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowStatistical Analysis
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Cox D, Aoki T, Seki J, Motoyama Y, Yoshida K. The pharmacology of the integrins. Med Res Rev. 1994;14:195–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Coller BS, Scudder LE, Berger HJ, Iuliucci JD. Inhibition of human platelet function in vivo with a monoclonal antibody. With observations on the newly dead as experimental subjects. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:635–638.

3. Scarborough RM, Naughton MA, Teng W, Rose JW, Phillips DR, Nannizzi L, Arfsten A, Campbell AM, Charo IF. Design of potent and specific integrin antagonists. Peptide antagonists with high specificity for glycoprotein IIb-IIIa. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1066–1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Zablocki JA, Rico JG, Garland RB, Rogers TE, Williams K, Schretzman LA, Rao SA, Bovy PR, Tjoeng FS, Lindmark RJ, Toth MV, Zupec ME, McMackins DE, Adams SP, Miyano M, Markos CS, Milton MN, Paulson S, Herin M, Jacqmin P, Nicholson NS, Panzer-Knodle SG, Haas NF, Page JD, Szalony JA, Taite BB, Salyers AK, King LW, Campion JG, Feigen LP. Potent in vitro and in vivo inhibitors of platelet aggregation based upon the Arg-Gly-Asp sequence of fibrinogen. (Aminobenzamidino) succinyl (ABAS) series of orally active fibrinogen receptor antagonists. J Med Chem. 1995;38:2378–2394.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1689–1696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:956–961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. The CAPTURE Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1429–1435.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. IMPACT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: IMPACT-II. Integrilin to Minimise Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis-II. Lancet. 1997;349:1422–1428.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Nicholson NS, Panzer-Knodle SG, Salyers AK, Taite BB, Szalony JA, Haas NF, King LW, Zablocki JA, Keller BT, Broschat K, Engleman WV, Herin M, Jacqmin P, Feigen LP. SC-54684A: an orally active inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Circulation. 1995;91:403–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kereiakes DJ, Runyon JP, Kleiman NS, Higby NA, Anderson LC, Hantsbarger G, McDonald S, Anders RJ. Differential dose-response to oral xemilofiban after antecedent intravenous abciximab. Administration for complex coronary intervention. Circulation. 1996;94:906–910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Rival J, Riddle JM, Stein PD. Effects of chronic smoking on platelet function. Thromb Res. 1987;45:75–85.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Umemura K, Kondo K, Ikeda Y, Nakashima M. Enhancement by ticlopidine of the inhibitory effect on in vitro platelet aggregation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78:1381–1384.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Coller BS. Monitoring platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy. Circulation. 1997;96:3828–3832.

14. Coller BS, Folts JD, Smith SR, Scudder LE, Jordan R. Abolition of in vivo platelet thrombus formation in primates with monoclonal antibodies to the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor. Correlation with bleeding time, platelet aggregation, and blockade of GPIIb/IIIa receptors. Circulation. 1989;80:1766–1774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. McGregor J, McGregor L, Lyons M, Bauer A, Huppert J. Identification of the fibrinogen binding sites on chymotrypsin treated human blood platelets using a monoclonal antibody. Thromb Haemost. 1985;54:236. Abstract.

16. Zablocki J, Miyano M, Garland R, Pireh D, Schretzman L, Rao S, Lindmark R, Panzer-Knodle S, Nicholson N, Taite B, Salyers A, King L, Campion J, Feigen L. Potent in vitro and in vivo inhibitors of platelet aggregation based upon the arg-gly-asp-phe sequence of fibrinogen. A proposal on the nature of the binding interaction between the arg-guanidine of RGDX mimetics and the platelet GPIIb-IIIa receptor. J Med Chem. 1993;36:1811–1819.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Phillips DR, Fitzgerald L, Parise L, Steiner B. Platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex: purification, characterization, and reconstitution into phospholipid vesicles. Methods Enzymol. 1992;215:244–263.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Poncelet P, George F, Papa S, Lanza F. Quantitiation of hemopoietic cell antigens in flow cytomery. Eur J Histochem. 1996;40(suppl 1):15–32.

19. Wang J, Yakamura H, Wang W, Roeske W. Receptor Ligand Interactions, A Practical Approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1992.

20. Simpfendorfer C, Kottke-Marchant K, Lowrie M, Anders RJ, Burns DM, Miller DP, Cove CS, DeFranco AC, Ellis SG, Moliterno DJ, Raymond RE, Sutton JM, Topol EJ. First chronic platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade. A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of xemilofiban in unstable angina with percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 1997;96:76–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Boukerche H, Berthier-Vergnes O, Bailly M, Dore JF, Leung LL, McGregor JL. A monoclonal antibody (LYP18) directed against the blood platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex inhibits human melanoma growth in vivo. Blood. 1989;74:909–912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Murphy J, Bordet J, Wyler B, Rissoan M, Chomarat P, Defrance T, Miossec P, Mcgregor J. The vitronectin receptor (avb3) is implicated, in cooperation with P-selectin and platelet-activating factor, in the adhesion of monocytes to activated endothelial cells. Biochem J. 1994;304:537–542.

23. Boukerche H, Berthier-Vergnes O, Tabone E, Dore JF, Leung LL, McGregor JL. Platelet-melanoma cell interaction is mediated by the glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex. Blood. 1989;74:658–663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. McEver RP, Baenziger NL, Majerus PW. Isolation and quantitation of the platelet membrane glycoprotein deficient in thrombasthenia using a monoclonal hybridoma antibody. J Clin Invest. 1980;66:1311–1318.

25. Newman PJ, Allen RW, Kahn RA, Kunicki TJ. Quantitation of membrane glycoprotein IIIa on intact human platelets using the monoclonal antibody, AP-3. Blood. 1985;65:227–232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Coller BS. A new murine monoclonal antibody reports an activation-dependent change in the conformation and/or microenvironment of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:101–108.

27. Bennett JS, Hoxie JA, Leitman SF, Vilaire G, Cines DB. Inhibition of fibrinogen binding to stimulated human platelets by a monoclonal antibody. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:2417–2421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Cox D, Seki J. Characterization of the binding of FK633 to the platelet fibrinogen receptor. Thromb Res. 1998;91:129–136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Wagner CL, Mascelli MA, Neblock DS, Weisman HF, Coller BS, Jordan RE. Analysis of GPIIb/IIIa receptor number by quantification of 7E3 binding to human platelets. Blood. 1997;88:907–914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Tcheng JE, Ellis SG, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, Talley JD, Wang AL, Weisman HF, Califf RM, Topol EJ. Pharmacodynamics of chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin antiplatelet antibody Fab 7E3 in high-risk coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1994;90:1757–1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Sheu JB, Ko WC, Hung WC, Peng HC, Huang TF. Interaction of thrombin-activated platelets with extracellular matrices (fibronectin and vitronectin): comparison of the activity of Arg-Gly-Asp-containing venom peptides and monoclonal antibodies against glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1997;49:78–84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Suehiro K, Smith JW, Plow EF. The ligand recognition specificity of beta3 integrins. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:10365–10371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Quinn MJ, Cox D, Theroux P, Fitzgerald D. Interaction of antagonists with the platelet GP IIb/IIIa: characterisation of two monoclonal antibodies that detect drug binding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;331(suppl A):353A. Abstract.

34. Honda S, Tomiyama Y, Pelletier AJ, Annis D, Honda Y, Orchekowski R, Ruggeri Z, Kunicki TJ. Topography of ligand-induced binding sites, including a novel cation-sensitive epitope (AP5) at the amino terminus, of the human integrin beta 3 subunit. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:11947–11954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Mould AP, Akiyama SK, Humphries MJ. The inhibitory anti-beta1 integrin monoclonal antibody 13 recognizes an epitope that is attenuated by ligand occupancy. Evidence for allosteric inhibition of integrin function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20365–20374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Liu CZ, Hur BT, Huang TF. Measurement of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade by flow cytometry with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated crotavirin, a member of disintegrins. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76:585–591.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Coller BS, Lang D, Scudder LE. Rapid and simple platelet function assay to assess glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Circulation. 1997;95:860–867.We describe a monoclonal antibody-based method to assess GPIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy. Mab1, a monoclonal antibody to the receptor complex, is displaced by increasing concentrations of abciximab and is unaffected by eptifibatide or SC-57101A. Conversely, Mab2, a monoclonal antibody to the ß3subunit of the receptor, is unaffected by abciximab but displaced by eptifibatide and SC-57101A. On the basis of the differential displacement of these antibodies, we can assess the number of free unoccupied GPIIb/IIIa receptors and total receptor number in patients receiving GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
R. B. Basani, H. Zhu, M. A. Thornton, C. S. Soto, W. F. DeGrado, M. A. Kowalska, J. S. Bennett, and M. Poncz
Species differences in small molecule binding to {alpha}IIb{beta}3 are the result of sequence differences in 2 loops of the {alpha}IIb {beta} propeller
Blood, January 22, 2009; 113(4): 902 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. F. Demarest, S. S. Sparks, K. Schell, S. Shibayama, C. B. McDanal, L. Fang, K. K. Adkison, A. Shachoy-Clark, and S. C. Piscitelli
In Vitro and Clinical Investigation of the Relationship Between CCR5 Receptor Occupancy and Anti-HIV Activity of Aplaviroc
J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2008; 48(10): 1179 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Patrono, C. Baigent, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Antiplatelet Drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 199S - 233S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Patrono, B. Coller, G. A. FitzGerald, J. Hirsh, and G. Roth
Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 234S - 264S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Larkin, D. Murphy, D. F. Reilly, M. Cahill, E. Sattler, P. Harriott, D. J. Cahill, and N. Moran
ICln, a Novel Integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3-Associated Protein, Functionally Regulates Platelet Activation
J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27286 - 27293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. Schwarz, Y. Katagiri, M. Kotani, N. Bassler, C. Loeffler, C. Bode, and K. Peter
Reversibility versus Persistence of GPIIb/IIIa Blocker-Induced Conformational Change of GPIIb/IIIa ({alpha}IIb{beta}3, CD41/CD61)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 1002 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. E. Mager, M. A. Mascelli, N. S. Kleiman, D. J. Fitzgerald, and D. R. Abernethy
Simultaneous Modeling of Abciximab Plasma Concentrations and ex Vivo Pharmacodynamics in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angioplasty
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 969 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Best, Y. A. Senis, G. E. Jarvis, H. J. Eagleton, D. J. Roberts, T. Saito, S. M. Jung, M. Moroi, P. Harrison, F. R. Green, et al.
GPVI levels in platelets: relationship to platelet function at high shear
Blood, October 15, 2003; 102(8): 2811 - 2818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. J. Quinn, T. V. Byzova, J. Qin, E. J. Topol, and E. F. Plow
Integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3 and Its Antagonism
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2003; 23(6): 945 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. R. Hantgan, D. S. Lyles, T. C. Mallett, M. Rocco, C. Nagaswami, and J. W. Weisel
Ligand Binding Promotes the Entropy-driven Oligomerization of Integrin alpha IIbbeta 3
J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3417 - 3426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. J. Quinn, R. T. Murphy, M. Dooley, J. B. Foley, and D. J. Fitzgerald
Occupancy of the Internal and External Pools of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa following Abciximab Bolus and Infusion
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 12, 2001; 297(2): 496 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. I. Osende, V. Fuster, E. I. Lev, D. Shimbo, U. Rauch, J. D. Marmur, M. Richard, D. Varon, and J. J. Badimon
Testing Platelet Activation With a Shear-Dependent Platelet Function Test Versus Aggregation-Based Tests : Relevance for Monitoring Long-Term Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1488 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. I. Lev, J. I. Osende, M. F. Richard, J. A. Robbins, J. A. Delfin, O. Rodriguez, S. K. Sharma, T. Jayasundera, J. J. Badimon, and J. D. Marmur
Administration of abciximab to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide: effect on platelet function
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2001; 37(3): 847 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Curtin and D.J. Fitzgerald
A cold start for oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2000; 21(24): 1992 - 1994.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Cox, R. Smith, M. Quinn, P. Theroux, P. Crean, and D. J. Fitzgerald
Evidence of platelet activation during treatment with a GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1514 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. J. Quinn, D. Cox, J. B. Foley, and D. J. Fitzgerald
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Number and Occupancy during Chronic Administration of an Oral Antagonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2000; 295(2): 670 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Adderley and D. J. Fitzgerald
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Antagonists Induce Apoptosis in Rat Cardiomyocytes by Caspase-3 Activation
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2000; 275(8): 5760 - 5766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
J. B. Bussel, T. J. Kunicki, and A. D. Michelson
Platelets: New Understanding of Platelet Glycoproteins and Their Role in Disease
Hematology, January 1, 2000; 2000(1): 222 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Platelets
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology