(Circulation. 1999;99:2537-2542.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Departments of Clinical Physiology (M.J., G.L., P.F.), Clinical Neurophysiology (M.E.), Cardiology (B.R.), and Nephrology (H.H.), Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden, and National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (G.E.), Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Peter Friberg, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail fribergp{at}mednet.gu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsSixty-five patients underwent renal angiography and measurements of plasma renin activity and angiotensin II in conjunction with estimation of sympathetic nerve activity by means of radiotracer dilution and intraneural recordings of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Age-matched healthy subjects (n=15) were examined for comparison. Total body norepinephrine (NE) spillover, an index of overall sympathetic nerve activity, was increased by 100% and MSNA by 60% in the hypertensive patients compared with healthy subjects (P<0.01 for both). A subgroup of 24 patients with well-defined renovascular hypertension (cured or improved hypertension after renal angioplasty) showed similar increases in total body NE spillover compared with the group at large. Patients with arterial plasma renin activity and angiotensin II levels above median had higher values for total body NE spillover than patients below median (P<0.01).
ConclusionsThis study unequivocally demonstrates elevated sympathetic nerve activity in patients with renovascular hypertension. The adrenergic overactivity may contribute to the blood pressure elevation and perhaps also to the high cardiovascular mortality in renovascular hypertension.
Key Words: hypertension nervous system, sympathetic renin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate whether sympathetic nervous activity is elevated in renovascular hypertension, we studied a large population of patients with renovascular hypertension and age-matched healthy control subjects. Importantly, the study included a subgroup of 24 well-defined patients with renovascular hypertension as established from cure or improvement of hypertension after renal angioplasty. Sympathetic nerve activity was assessed by isotope dilution to determine total body NE spillover. To also assess efferent sympathetic nerve traffic, we obtained simultaneous recordings of MSNA and measurements of NE spillover in a subset of patients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypertensive Patients (n=65)
The study comprised patients with hypertension who were
undergoing a clinical investigation for renovascular hypertension
involving renal vein blood sampling for assessment of plasma renin
activity (PRA) (Table 1
). All
patients had hypertension and renal artery stenosis
50%
according to angiography. Renal angioplasty was performed in 40
patients. A patient was considered cured of hypertension if
revascularization was followed by normotension
(mean diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg) without
additional antihypertensive therapy. A patient was considered improved
if blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure
95 mm Hg) was maintained with a 50% reduction of
antihypertensive medication or with a mean diastolic blood
pressure reduction of
20 mm Hg with unchanged medical treatment
1 year after intervention. In 24 of the 40 patients who underwent renal
angioplasty, hypertension was cured or improved. Clinical data and the
different antihypertensive treatment regimens for all hypertensives are
given in Tables 2
and 3
.
|
|
|
Healthy Subjects (n=15)
The subjects in the control group were of similar age and body
mass index as the hypertensive patients (Table 1
). None had a
history of neurological or cardiovascular disease. A
comprehensive clinical evaluation in conjunction with hematology,
routine serum biochemistry, and ECG testing were all within normal
ranges.
Catheterization
Patients were studied in the morning in a
catheterization laboratory. All subjects refrained from
smoking and from drinking coffee for the 12 hours preceding the study.
Patients undergoing a clinical investigation for renal artery
stenosis were hospitalized 4 days before
catheterization, and while they were inpatients, they
were kept on a low-salt diet (40 mmol/24 hours). Diuretics
and calcium channel blockers were given during the hospital stay,
whereas other antihypertensive medications were withdrawn 2 days before
the investigation. A cannula was introduced
percutaneously into the left radial artery for blood
pressure monitoring and blood sampling. In all hypertensives, both
renal veins were catheterized via femoral veins by use of the Seldinger
technique. The renal vein catheters were positioned under fluoroscopic
control, with positions confirmed by means of oxygen
saturation.
Healthy subjects were studied under similar conditions as hypertensive patients except that they were not hospitalized and remained on their regular diet. A cannula was introduced percutaneously into the left radial artery for blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling. The latter was performed after 20 minutes of quiet rest after catheter placement.
Infusions
Para-aminohippurate (PAH, Merck Sharp & Dohme; dosing dependent
on estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) and tracer
doses of L-2,5,6-[3H]NE (40 to 60
Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear) were infused into a
peripheral vein. An infusion rate of 1.0 to 1.5 µCi of
[3H]NE per minute was used.
Sympathetic Nerve Recording
Multiunit postganglionic sympathetic nerve activity was
recorded with a tungsten microelectrode with a tip diameter of a
few microns inserted into a muscle-innervating fascicle of the peroneal
nerve at the fibular head. A reference electrode was inserted
subcutaneously 1 to 2 cm from the recording electrode. Details
regarding the recording technique and the criteria for MSNA
have been provided previously.6 7 8 The number of MSNA
bursts, which occur in bursts strictly coupled to the cardiac rhythm,
was counted by inspection of the mean voltage neurogram.9
Two independent laboratory colleagues who were not part of the study
and had no knowledge of the study protocol performed the
analysis. Nerve activity was expressed as the average burst
frequency (bursts/min).
Experimental Protocol
Baseline blood samples were taken simultaneously
from a radial artery and 1 or both renal veins at steady state
30
minutes after the infusions were begun. Samples were collected into
ice-chilled tubes containing heparin or EDTA and glutathione. Plasma
was separated by centrifugation and stored at -80°C
until assayed for catecholamines, PRA, and
angiotensin (Ang) II. Renal plasma flow was derived from
total infusion clearance of PAH corrected for renal fractional
extraction.
In 10 hypertensive patients, MSNA recordings and measurements of total body NE spillover were performed simultaneously, whereas MSNA examinations in healthy subjects were performed on another occasion. The intraindividual reproducibility of repeated recordings of resting MSNA is well established.7 8
Assays
Catecholamines were extracted from plasma (1 mL) and
samples of infusate (10 µL) by alumina adsorption and were separated
by high-performance liquid
chromatography.10 Timed collection of
[3H] eluate leaving the electrochemical cell
permitted separation of [3H]-labeled NE for
subsequent counting by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. Interassay
coefficients of variation were 4.6% for endogenous NE and
3.2% for [3H]NE.
PRA was measured according to the method of Giese et al11 with radioimmunoassay used for Ang I. Reference values are 0.2 to 2.0 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1. Ang II was assayed according to the methods of Kappelgaard et al12 and Morton and Webb.13
Calculations
Total body NE spillover (STB) was
measured by the radiotracer method14 and calculated
according to the formula
![]() |
![]() |
Total body NE clearance (CLTB) was
calculated as
![]() |
Statistical Methods
Results are expressed as mean±SEM.
Student's t tests for unpaired observations were used. Parameters not normally distributed were logarithmically transformed before the parametric test. If a nonnormal distribution was retained, the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired comparisons was used. The relation between 2 variables was assessed by calculating the rank correlation coefficient according to Spearman. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.
Results
Mean arterial pressure was elevated by 26% in
hypertensive patients, whereas renal plasma flow was reduced by 43%
compared with healthy subjects (P<0.01 for all; Table 4
). Arterial plasma
concentrations of NE were elevated by 154% in renovascular
hypertensives, whereas arterial PRA and Ang II were 23- and
3-fold increased, respectively, compared with controls
(P<0.01 for all; Table 4
). Total body NE
spillover and MSNA were elevated by 100% and 60%, respectively,
in renovascular hypertensives compared with healthy subjects
(P<0.01; Figure 1
), whereas
total body NE clearance did not differ between the groups (Table 4
).
|
|
Twenty-four patients whose hypertension was cured or improved after renal angioplasty also showed elevated total body NE spillover compared with healthy controls (6854±957 versus 3456±350 pmol/min, respectively; P<0.05). Values for this subgroup of 24 patients did not differ from the group of renovascular hypertensives as a whole.
Patients taking ACE inhibitor or ß-blocker treatment for
hypertension whose therapy was withdrawn 3 to 4 days before the
investigation showed similar values for total body NE spillover
compared with other hypertensives. Patients taking calcium channel
blockers did not differ in total body NE spillover compared with
the other hypertensives (7032±579 pmol/min for patients taking calcium
channel blockers versus 7324±1241 pmol/min for other hypertensives).
Positive relationships were found between total body NE spillover
and both PRA and Ang II (r=0.36 and r=0.30,
respectively; P<0.05). Patients with arterial
plasma concentrations of PRA and Ang II above median had higher total
body NE spillover than patients below median (P<0.01;
Figure 2
). In patients with
arterial PRA above median, MSNA was higher than in patients
below median (60±5 versus 49±2 bursts/min; P=0.05). In
hypertensive patients in whom simultaneous measurements of
total body NE spillover and MSNA were performed, a close
relationship was found between these variables (Figure 3
). Patients with GFR below median had
similar values for total body NE spillover as patients above median
(6806±661 versus 7185 pmol/min for patients above median), and there
was no correlation between GFR and total body NE spillover.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental renovascular hypertension is divided into 3 stages.2 Removal of the affected kidney will cure or improve hypertension only in the first and second phases, whereas hypertension will persist in the third phase, which indicates that changes in the contralateral kidney are of importance for maintenance of blood pressure elevation. In the first phase, vasoconstrictor effects of Ang II are the main cause of hypertension, whereas other mechanisms such as sodium retention or increased sympathetic activity may be involved together with Ang II in the second and third phases of experimental renovascular hypertension. Although human renovascular hypertension will not have the clear phase distinction of experimental renovascular hypertension, there are data supporting other mechanisms operating in conjunction with Ang II vasoconstriction to maintain the blood pressure increase.2 4
The present study adds important new information to existing knowledge about sympathetic nerve activity in human renovascular hypertension because previous data in these patients have been inconclusive.4 5 Grassi et al5 reported normal MSNA in secondary hypertension, whereas Miyajima et al4 found increased MSNA in renovascular hypertensives compared with healthy controls and primary hypertensives. The small size of the study population, its heterogenous nature, and the fact that patients with an adrenal pheochromocytoma and renovascular hypertension were lumped together may have confounded the results of the former study.
Patients in the present study had longstanding hypertension, whereas increased MSNA and total body NE spillover have been observed primarily in borderline and younger primary hypertensives.15 16 Although one has to be cautious when comparing the present results with previously reported data in primary hypertensives, the level of sympathetic activation appears higher in renovascular hypertension. Esler et al15 reported a 38% increase in total body NE spillover compared with healthy control subjects (largely due to higher NE release in hypertensive patients aged <40 years), whereas a 100% increase in total body NE spillover compared with healthy subjects was found in the present study. Elevated MSNA has been shown in patients with accelerated primary hypertension with an activated renin-angiotensin system and retinopathy.17 The latter results corroborate with the findings of the present study. Data indicating interactions between the renin-angiotensin and the sympathetic nervous systems18 19 suggest that activation of the former system may be a factor contributing to elevated sympathetic nerve activity. After angioplasty of unilateral renal artery stenosis in humans, MSNA decreased concomitantly with a fall in plasma concentrations of Ang II.4 The present group of renovascular hypertensives had high circulating levels of PRA and Ang II. Although only weak relationships were found between total body NE spillover and indexes of the renin-angiotensin system, patients with PRA and Ang II above the median had increased adrenergic drive compared with patients with values below the median. Although a causal relationship was not established, our data lend some support for a facilitatory role of the renin-angiotensin system in adrenergic activity in human renovascular hypertension. Ang II may exert a facilitatory effect on NE release by stimulation of prejunctional Ang II receptors on peripheral sympathetic nerves20 or by an action on the central nervous system.19 Although the close relationship between total body NE spillover and MSNA suggests a central mechanism, a facilitatory effect on NE release in the periphery by Ang II cannot be ruled out. Clearly, the contribution of increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system cannot explain a major part of the variability in total body NE spillover. Other mechanisms behind this adrenergic overactivity in hypertensive patients must be considered.
Recent evidence suggests a role for the afferent renal nerves in the development of increased sympathetic activity in conditions associated with injured or ischemic kidneys. Patients with chronic renal failure and native kidneys showed increased MSNA compared with patients who underwent bilateral nephrectomy.21 Thus, increased central sympathetic outflow was apparently mediated by an afferent signal arising in the kidneys. In addition, Miyajima et al4 found that the increased MSNA in renovascular hypertensives was normalized 4 to 10 days after successful percutaneous angioplasty of a renal artery stenosis. Restoration of blood flow to the ischemic kidneys in these patients may have eliminated the afferent stimulus that provoked the increased adrenergic drive, although lowered Ang II concentrations may also have played a role.
In the present study, renal involvement was evident in terms of reduced GFR and reduced renal plasma flow in the hypertensive group. Hence, our patient group showed evidence of early renal insufficiency, which may be an initiator for the prevailing increase in sympathetic nerve activity. Even though no relationship was found between GFR and the indexes of sympathetic nerve activity, ischemic metabolites in affected kidneys may have conveyed an afferent stimulus to the central nervous system, thereby provoking increased adrenergic drive, although overall GFR was only slightly reduced.
Study Limitations
All patients were put on a low-salt diet to stimulate the
renin-angiotensin system and increase the sensitivity for
diagnosis of a functionally important renal artery stenosis.
This procedure, however, was not followed in the healthy control group.
It is important to stress that a rigorous low-salt diet has been shown
to increase renal NE spillover without affecting total body NE
spillover.22 That study was performed as a crossover
design, so when the healthy subjects were given a normal sodium diet,
renal NE spillover returned to normal. An important issue in the
context of the present results is that in the former
study,22 total body NE spillover did not change during
sodium restriction, whereas in the present study, total body NE
spillover was considerably elevated in renovascular hypertension.
Furthermore, a recent study investigating the neurohormonal response to
salt restriction in patients with primary hypertension showed no change
in plasma concentration of NE during salt restriction.23 A
second limitation to interpretation of the elevated adrenergic drive in
hypertensives involves the possibility for a "drug or drug
withdrawal" effect on sympathetic nerve activity. About half of the
study population was undergoing ß-blocker treatment, and some
patients were taking ACE inhibitors. Both these drugs were
discontinued
2 days before the investigation. Moreover, 70% of the
patients were on undergoing long-term treatment with a calcium channel
blocker. Although the results of long-term treatment with calcium
channel blockers on sympathetic activity have been
variable,24 25 there is a possibility for sympathetic
reflex activation as a response to the vasodilatory effect of these
drugs. However, total body NE spillover did not differ among
patients treated or not treated with a ß-blocker, calcium channel
blocker, or ACE inhibitor. Hence, an important drug or drug
withdrawal effect on overall sympathetic nerve activity seems
unlikely.
In conclusion, sympathetic nerve activity is markedly elevated in patients with renovascular hypertension. This may contribute to the blood pressure elevation and perhaps also to the high cardiovascular mortality that have been reported in renovascular hypertension.26 27 28 Clonidine has been shown to markedly reduce blood pressure in renovascular hypertension, which suggests a role for antihypertensive therapy that diminishes central sympathetic outflow in patients who are not candidates for renal angioplasty.29 30 31
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 27, 1998; revision received February 18, 1999; accepted February 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Brown JJ, Davies DL, Morton JJ, Robertson JI, Cuesta V, Lever AF, Padfield PL, Trust P. Mechanism of renal hypertension. Lancet. 1976;1:12191221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Suzuki H, Ferrario CM, Speth RC, Brosnihan KB, Smeby RR, de Silva P. Alterations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid norepinephrine and angiotensin II during the development of renal hypertension in conscious dogs. Hypertension. 1983;5:I-139I-148.
4.
Miyajima E, Yamada Y, Yoshida Y, Matsukawa T,
Shionoiri H, Tochikubo O, Ishii M. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity in
renovascular hypertension and primary aldosteronism.
Hypertension. 1991;17:10571062.
5.
Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A,
Mancia G. Baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in essential
and secondary hypertension. Hypertension. 1998;31:6872.
6.
Vallbo Å, Hagbarth K-E, Torebjàrk H, Wallin B.
Somatosensory, proprioceptive and sympathetic activity in human
peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev. 1979;59:919957.
7. Sundlöf G, Wallin B. The variability of muscle nerve sympathetic activity in resting recumbent man. J Physiol. 1977;272:382397.
8. Wallin B, Elam M. Microneurography and autonomic dysfunction. In: Low P, ed. Clinical Autonomous Disorders: Evaluation and Management. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co; 1997:233243.
9.
Wallin B, Elam M. Insights in intraneural
recordings of sympathetic nerve traffic in humans. News
Physiol Sci. 1994;9:711.
10.
Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Stull R, Keiser HR,
Sunderland T, Murphy DL, Kopin IJ. Simultaneous
liquid-chromatographic determination of
3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, catecholamines, and
3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine in plasma, and their responses to inhibition
of monoamine oxidase. Clin Chem. 1986;32:20302033.
11. Giese J, Aurell M, Munck O. Peripheral and renal venous plasma renin concentrations in hypertensive patients with unilateral renal or renovascular disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1972;6(suppl 15):3947.
12. Kappelgaard A, Damker Nielsen M, Giese J. Measurement of angiotensin II in human plasma: technical modifications and practical experience. Clin Chem Acta. 1976;67:299306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Morton J, Webb D. Measurement of plasma angiotensin II. Clin Sci. 1985;68:483484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Esler M, Jackman G, Bobik A, Kelleher D, Jennings G, Leonard P, Skews H, Korner P. Determination of norepinephrine apparent release rate and clearance in humans. Life Sci. 1979;25:14611470.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Esler M, Jennings G, Biviano B, Lambert G, Hasking G. Mechanism of elevated plasma noradrenaline in the course of essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:539544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Floras JS, Hara K. Sympathoneural and haemodynamic characteristics of young subjects with mild essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11:647655.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Matsukawa T, Mano T, Gotoh E, Ishii M. Elevated sympathetic nerve activity in patients with accelerated essential hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:2528.
18. Katholi R. Renal nerves in the pathogenesis of hypertension in experimental animals and humans. Am J Physiol. 1983;14:F1F14.
19. Brody MJ, Varner KJ, Vasquez EC, Lewis SJ. Central nervous system and the pathogenesis of hypertension: sites and mechanisms. Hypertension. 1991;18:III-7III-12. Review.
20. Majewski H, Hedler L, Schurr C, Starke K. Modulation of noradrenaline release in the pithed rabbit: a role for angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6:888896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Converse R Jr, Jacobsen TN, Toto RD, Jost CM, Cosentino F, Fouad-Tarazi F, Victor RG. Sympathetic overactivity in patients with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:19121918.[Abstract]
22.
Friberg P, Meredith I, Jennings G, Lambert G, Fazio V,
Esler M. Evidence for increased renal norepinephrine
overflow during sodium restriction in humans. Hypertension. 1990;16:121130.
23.
Krekels M, Schaper N, de Leeuw P. Sensitivity of
blood pressure and renin activation during sodium restriction.
Hypertension. 1997;30:12161222.
24. Goldsmith SR. Effect of amlodipine and felodipine on sympathetic activity and baroreflex function in normal humans. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:902908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Lindqvist M, Kahan T, Melcher A, Hjemdahl P. Acute and
chronic calcium antagonist treatment elevates sympathetic
activity in primary hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;24:287296.
26. Cambria R, Brewster D, L'Italien G, Gertler J, Abbot W, LaMuraglia G, Moncure A, Vignati J, Bazari H, Fang L, Atamian S. Renal artery reconstruction for the preservation of renal function. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:371382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Conlon PJ, Athirakul K, Kovalik E, Schwab SJ, Crowley J, Stack R, McCants CB Jr, Mark DB, Bashore TM, Albers F. Survival in renovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:252256.[Abstract]
28. Isles C, Main J, O'Connell J, Brown I, Findlay J, Stewart R, Wilkinsson R. Survival associated with renovascular disease in Glasgow and Newcastle: a collaborative study. Scott Med J. 1990;35:7073.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Mathias CJ, Wilkinson A, Lewis PS, Peart WS, Sever PS,
Snell ME. Clonidine lowers blood pressure independently of renin
suppression in patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis.
Chest. 1983;83:357359.
30. Kooner JS, Peart WS, Mathias CJ. The sympathetic nervous system in hypertension due to unilateral renal artery stenosis in man. Clin Auton Res. 1991;1:195204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Esler M. High blood pressure management: potential benefits of I1 agents. J Hypertens Suppl. 1998;16:S19S24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Grassi Assessment of Sympathetic Cardiovascular Drive in Human Hypertension: Achievements and Perspectives Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 690 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Schlaich, F. Socratous, S. Hennebry, N. Eikelis, E. A. Lambert, N. Straznicky, M. D. Esler, and G. W. Lambert Sympathetic Activation in Chronic Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 933 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Safian and R. D. Madder Refining the Approach to Renal Artery Revascularization J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 161 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J Dubel and T. P Murphy The role of percutaneous revascularization for renal artery stenosis Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2008; 13(2): 141 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. McBryde, S.-J. Guild, C. J. Barrett, J. W. Osborn, and S. C. Malpas Cardiovascular Control: Angiotensin II-based hypertension and the sympathetic nervous system: the role of dose and increased dietary salt in rabbits Exp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 92(5): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Evans, S. L. Burke, G. W. Lambert, and G. A. Head Renal responses to acute reflex activation of renal sympathetic nerve activity and renal denervation in secondary hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1247 - R1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Davern and G. A. Head Fos-Related Antigen Immunoreactivity After Acute and Chronic Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension in the Rabbit Brain Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1170 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Burke, G. A. Head, G. W. Lambert, and R. G. Evans Renal Sympathetic Neuroeffector Function in Renovascular and Angiotensin II-Dependent Hypertension in Rabbits Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 932 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Cooper and T. P. Murphy The Case for Renal Artery Stenting for Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 263 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kennedy, M. W. Burket, S. A. Khuder, J. I. Shapiro, R. V. Topp, and C. J. Cooper Quality of life improves after renal artery stenting. Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2006; 8(2): 129 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. de Silva, N. P. Nikitin, S. Bhandari, A. Nicholson, A. L. Clark, and J. G.F. Cleland Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in chronic heart failure: should we intervene? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2005; 26(16): 1596 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Vonend, A. Okonek, J. Stegbauer, S. Habbel, I. Quack, and L. C. Rump Renovascular effects of sympathetic cotransmitters ATP and NPY are age-dependent in spontaneoulsy hypertensive rats Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 345 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Lohmeier, D. A. Hildebrandt, S. Warren, P. J. May, and J. T. Cunningham Recent insights into the interactions between the baroreflex and the kidneys in hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): R828 - R836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ran, T. Hirano, and M. Adachi Chronic ANG II infusion increases plasma triglyceride level by stimulating hepatic triglyceride production in rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2004; 287(5): E955 - E961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Head and S. L. Burke Sympathetic Responses to Stress and Rilmenidine in 2K1C Rabbits: Evidence of Enhanced Nonvascular Effector Mechanism Hypertension, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 636 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Grisk and R. Rettig Interactions between the sympathetic nervous system and the kidneys in arterial hypertension Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2004; 61(2): 238 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y.H. Chan, L.-L. Wang, Y.-M. Chao, and S. H.H. Chan Downregulation of Basal iNOS at the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Is Innate in SHR Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 563 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dendorfer, A. Thornagel, W. Raasch, O. Grisk, K. Tempel, and P. Dominiak Angiotensin II Induces Catecholamine Release by Direct Ganglionic Excitation Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 348 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kagiyama, A. Varela, M. I. Phillips, and S. M. Galli Antisense Inhibition of Brain Renin-Angiotensin System Decreased Blood Pressure in Chronic 2-Kidney, 1 Clip Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Rump, K. Amann, S. Orth, and E. Ritz Sympathetic overactivity in renal disease: a window to understand progression and cardiovascular complications of uraemia? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 1735 - 1738. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Grisk, B. A. J. Frey, A. Uber, and R. Rettig Sympathetic activity in early renal posttransplantation hypertension in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): R1737 - R1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Johansson, M. Elam, B. Rundqvist, G. Eisenhofer, H. Herlitz, G. Jensen, and P. Friberg Differentiated Response of the Sympathetic Nervous System to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2000; 36(4): 543 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Muscara, W. McKnight, F. Lovren, C. R. Triggle, G. Cirino, and J. L. Wallace Antihypertensive properties of a nitric oxide-releasing naproxen derivative in two-kidney, one-clip rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): H528 - H535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Frohlich Research Means "Look Back" Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 693 - 693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Moser, J. Faulhaber, R. J. Wiesner, and H. Ehmke Predominant activation of endothelin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by norepinephrine in rat left ventricle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1389 - R1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |