(Circulation. 1999;99:248-253.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (P.B.B., M.R.B., D.H., S.M., D.R.H.), and the Section of Biostatistics (D.E.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Peter B. Berger, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Disease and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail berger.peter{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe analyzed 827 patients
undergoing successful stent placement in 1061 coronary segments
at Mayo Clinic who were treated between May 1, 1996, and October 31,
1997. Chronic warfarin therapy, cardiogenic shock, and enrollment in
research protocols requiring 4 weeks of ticlopidine were exclusion
criteria; ticlopidine was discontinued after 14 days in all remaining
patients. The mean age of the study population was 64±11 years;
49% had suffered a prior infarction, 20% had undergone
coronary artery bypass surgery, and 65% had multivessel
disease. The indication for stent placement was dissection or abrupt
closure in 31% of patients and suboptimal results from balloon
angioplasty in 18%. Placement was elective in 51% of patients, and
10.3% of patients were treated within 12 hours of an acute myocardial
infarction. Mean nominal stent size was 3.3±0.5 mm. High-pressure
inflations (
12 atm) were performed in all patients (mean, 17±4 atm).
Intravascular ultrasound was used to facilitate stent placement in
8.8% of patients. Abciximab was administered to 38% of patients; 11%
of patients who were at increased risk of stent thrombosis were treated
with enoxaparin for 10 to 14 days. Adverse
cardiovascular events in the 14 days after stent
placement occurred in 11 patients (1.3%). Two patients died of
nonischemic causes (sepsis and renal failure) in the 15th
through 30th days after ticlopidine was stopped. However, there were no
cardiovascular deaths, myocardial infarctions,
coronary artery bypass operations, or repeat angioplasty
procedures between the 15th and 30th days; stent thrombosis did not
occur in any patient after ticlopidine had been stopped. No patient
developed neutropenia, although 1.8% of the first 489 patients who
were closely monitored for side effects from ticlopidine developed side
effects requiring its discontinuation, and milder side effects occurred
in 4.7%.
ConclusionsIn patients receiving intracoronary stents, the discontinuation of ticlopidine therapy 14 days after stent placement is associated with a very low frequency of stent thrombosis and other adverse events.
Key Words: stents angioplasty thrombosis platelet aggregation inhibitors ticlopidine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, ticlopidine is frequently associated with side effects, the
most serious of which is neutropenia, which can be life
threatening.9 In view of this, white blood cell counts
need to be measured serially, generally every 2 weeks, in patients
treated with ticlopidine for
4 weeks. Ticlopidine-induced neutropenia
occurs in
1% of patients treated for >2 weeks; it has not been
described in patients treated for
2 weeks.10 11 12
Because we observed 3 cases of severe neutropenia (<0.5x109 cells/L) in 417 patients (0.7%) treated with ticlopidine for 30 days after stent placement but did not observe any cases of stent thrombosis between 2 and 4 weeks after stent placement in these patients, we hypothesized that the risk of life-threatening neutropenia in the 15th through 30th days after stent placement may exceed the risk of stent thrombosis during this time interval and that discontinuation of ticlopidine after 14 days might reduce the frequency of serious complications associated with stent placement.
Therefore, we performed this prospective study to determine the risk of stent thrombosis and other adverse events, as well as the frequency of side effects from ticlopidine, in patients receiving intracoronary stents in whom ticlopidine was stopped 14 days after stent placement.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stent-Implantation Procedure
All patients received
325 mg of aspirin before or during the
procedure; an initial dose of 500 mg of ticlopidine was generally
administered in the catheterization laboratory
immediately before the stent-implantation procedure. A second dose of
250 mg of ticlopidine was generally administered the evening of the
procedure. During the procedure, patients generally received a
weight-adjusted bolus of heparin (100 U/kg) and additional heparin
during the procedure as needed to maintain an activated
clotting time of 250 to 350 seconds. At the discretion of the
interventional cardiologist, abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a
0.10 µg/min continuous infusion for 12 hours) was administered to 312
patients (38%) believed to be at high risk for thromboembolic
complications. In patients to whom abciximab was given, a lower target
activated clotting time of 200 to 300 seconds was used.
Stents were implanted according to standard
percutaneous techniques. The stents used in the
present study were either Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents,
Palmaz or Palmaz-Schatz biliary stents (Johnson & Johnson,
Interventional System Co), or the Gianturco-Roubin Flex-Stent (Cook
Inc). After stent implantation, high-pressure balloon inflation to
12
atm was performed after deployment in all patients with minimally
compliant balloon catheters.
Intravascular Ultrasound
Intravascular ultrasound was not required by protocol but was
performed for clinical or angiographic indications at the discretion of
the interventional cardiologist. When intravascular ultrasound was
performed, either a 2.9F monorail system with a 30-MHz
transducer-tipped catheter (Micro View; Cardiovascular
Imaging Systems Inc) or a 3.5F Sonicath monorail system with a 30-MHz
transducer-tipped catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation/Sci-Med Life
Systems Inc) was used. The ultrasound catheter was advanced distal to
the stent, and images were recorded while the imaging catheter was
manually withdrawn through the stented segment. Images were stored on
Super VHS videotape. Qualitative analyses and quantitative
measurements were generally performed during the procedure. On the
basis of results of intravascular ultrasound, further expansion of the
stent was performed if any of the following were observed: incomplete
stent expansion (a cross-sectional area within the stent <90% of the
cross-sectional area of the distal reference segment), incomplete
apposition of the stent struts or loops to the vessel wall, uncovered
dissections, >50% obstruction of the vessel lumen immediately
adjacent to the stent, or inflow or outflow obstruction of >60% of
the cross-sectional area relative to the reference segment proximal or
distal to the stented segment.
Angiographic Analysis
Angiography was performed in orthogonal views in all cases.
Sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) was given before the
initial and final angiographic assessments. Visual analysis of
the angiograms was used to guide the procedure. Lesions were
characterized according to a modification of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association scoring system by
the interventional cardiologist immediately before the
procedure.13 14
Medication After Discharge
After the procedure, additional heparin was generally not
administered, and sheaths were removed when the activated
clotting time was <160 seconds. Patients were treated with 80 to 325
mg/d aspirin indefinitely and 250 mg of ticlopidine twice daily for 14
days. A complete blood count was obtained before the procedure, after 2
weeks of ticlopidine, and 2 weeks after ticlopidine had been
discontinued. Some patients believed to be at increased risk of stent
thrombosis, such as those with acute myocardial infarction, those
receiving stents
3 mm in diameter, those with a residual
stenosis after stent placement of
20% by visual estimate,
those with diffuse proximal or distal disease that could not be
dilated, those in whom angiographic evidence of coronary
dissection persisted after stent placement, and those with angiographic
evidence of a large burden of intracoronary thrombus before the
procedure or any thrombus after the procedure were also administered
subcutaneous injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) in
doses of 30 to 60 mg twice a day for 10 to 14 days at the discretion of
their interventional cardiologist beginning 4 to 6 hours after sheath
removal. Additional medical therapy was administered by the patient's
physician if necessary.
Follow-Up
The first 489 patients were telephoned by the nurse stent
coordinator 2 and 4 weeks after the procedure. Subsequently, patients
in the study population were contacted 6 months after the procedure,
and 30-day events were analyzed. The case records of all
patients followed up at this institution were examined. Documentation
of adverse events that occurred at other institutions during follow-up
was obtained from the attending physicians at those
institutions.
Definitions
Successful stent placement was defined as delivery of the stent
to the treatment site with reduction in the residual stenosis
to <50% without the in-laboratory occurrence of death, myocardial
infarction, or a complication requiring immediate coronary
artery bypass surgery. Multivessel disease was defined as the presence
of a
70% lesion in a major coronary artery or its major
branches and a
50% lesion in a second coronary artery or its
major branches. Periprocedural myocardial infarction was considered to
have occurred when a patient developed prolonged chest pain thought to
be the result of myocardial ischemia by the patient's
physician or had a rise in serum creatine phosphokinase elevation to 2
times normal or an elevated MB isoenzyme and developed new Q waves on
the ECG. Myocardial infarction after discharge was considered to have
occurred when any 2 of the following 3 criteria were met: (1) prolonged
chest pain thought to be the result of myocardial ischemia by
the patient's physician, (2) serum creatine phosphokinase elevation to
2 times normal or elevated MB isoenzyme, or (3) development of new Q
waves or significant ST-T wave changes on the ECG. Severe neutropenia
was defined as <0.5x109 cells/L.
Follow-Up Events
Major clinical events after discharge included death, myocardial
infarction (Q-wave and nonQ-wave), stent thrombosis, coronary
artery bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty of the stented segment.
Stent thrombosis was considered to have occurred in all patients in
whom a follow-up angiogram revealed evidence of thrombus within the
stent, in whom a myocardial infarction occurred without proof that the
infarct artery was not the stented vessel, or in whom death occurred
that was believed to possibly be cardiac in origin. The frequency of
side effects from ticlopidine was also analyzed. Follow-up
angiography was generally only performed for clinical indications, such
as the recurrence of severe angina or a markedly abnormal
functional test, at the discretion of the attending physician. Results
are presented as either a percent of the total or as mean±1SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics
The angiographic and procedural characteristics of the study
population are displayed in Table 2
.
There were 1061 segments treated in the 827 patients; 1253 stents (1.5
stents per patient) were placed. The number of stents placed per
patient was 1 in 525 patients, 2 in 210 patients, 3 in 62 patients, 4
in 25 patients, 5 in 2 patients, and 6 in 2 patients. Stents placed
include the Palmaz-Schatz (78%), the FlexStent (19%), and Johnson &
Johnson biliary stents (3%). Several patients received >1 stent
design; a Palmaz-Schatz stent was placed in 84% of patients, a
FlexStent was placed in 21% of patients, and a biliary stent was
placed in 3% of patients. Mean nominal stent size was 3.3±0.5
mm. High-pressure inflation (
12 atm) was performed in all patients
(mean, 17±4 atm). The mean postprocedural residual stenosis
within the stents was 4±7%.
|
Frequency of Intravascular Ultrasound
Intravascular ultrasound was performed in 73 (8.8%) of the 827
patients on the basis of physician preference or the angiographic
appearance of the treated vessel and led to additional treatment (such
as additional balloon inflations or placement of additional stents) in
49% of these patients.
Adverse Cardiovascular Events During the
Initial Hospitalization
Of the 827 patients in whom angiographic success had been
achieved, 5 (0.6%) died during the initial hospitalization. One
patient might have suffered stent thrombosis. She had received 600 mL
of contrast, had only 1 kidney, and refused renal dialysis and other
life-prolonging measures. The last ECG before her death on the third
day after stent placement suggested ischemia without ST-segment
elevation; no autopsy was performed. One patient died of a
pulmonary hemorrhage shortly after the procedure;
abciximab had been given. The stent was patent without thrombus on
autopsy. One patient died of a pulmonary embolus shortly after
the procedure; there was no evidence that stent thrombosis had
occurred. One patient with thrombocytopenia secondary to cirrhosis and
lung cancer died of a retroperitoneal hemorrhage that occurred
14 hours after the procedure; the stent was widely patent without
thrombus on autopsy. One patient died of multiorgan system failure and
a possible pulmonary embolism. On autopsy, the stent was widely
patent without thrombus. Four patients (0.5%) required repeat
procedures. One suffered a nonQ-wave infarction within several hours
of stent placement. Repeat angiography revealed a severe dissection
distal to the stent without evident thrombus, and an additional stent
was placed. The other 3 patients suffered stent thrombosis and
underwent urgent repeat angioplasty; all 3 suffered nonQ-wave
myocardial infarction and survived. One had been receiving enoxaparin.
In all, 9 patients (1.1%) suffered 1 of these adverse eventsdeath,
myocardial infarction, repeat angioplasty or bypass surgeryduring
their initial hospitalizations.
Adverse Cardiovascular Events Between Hospital
Discharge and 14 Days After the Procedure
Two additional patients suffered adverse events after discharge
during the 2 weeks of ticlopidine therapy. Both patients died suddenly,
and stent thrombosis may have been the cause. Neither patient underwent
autopsy. There were no other adverse cardiovascular
events after discharge.
Therefore, a total of 11 patients (1.3%) suffered an adverse event in the 14 days after stent placement, during the administration of ticlopidine. Six events (0.7%) were definitely or possibly the result of stent thrombosis.
Among patients in whom a suboptimal stent result was achieved (defined as a residual stenosis >20%, any dissection or thrombus evident after completion of the case, or less than Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow), 2.7% (5 of 188) died or suffered stent thrombosis within 14 days compared with 0.9% (6 of 639) in whom an optimal result had been achieved (P=0.07). In patients in whom a stent was placed nonelectively (defined as stent placement for a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result or for threatened or acute closure), 1.7% (7 of 403) died or suffered stent thrombosis within 14 days compared with 0.9% (4 of 424) in whom a stent was placed electively (P=0.32).
Adverse Cardiovascular Events Between 15 and
30 Days
Two patients died in the 15th through 30th days, after
ticlopidine had been discontinued. One died on day 23 of overwhelming
systemic infection after abdominal surgery for a colonic abscess. A
second patient died on day 17 of a ventricular
tachyarrhythmia while suffering from acute renal
failure and hyperkalemia. She had had a myocardial
infarction shortly before stent placement and had chronic congestive
heart failure and a prior stroke. The patient had insisted that
dialysis not be performed and declined other life-prolonging measures.
However, there were no ischemia-related deaths and no
myocardial infarctions, repeat angioplasty procedures, or
coronary artery bypass operations between the 15th and 30th
days; stent thrombosis did not occur in any patient.
Adverse Reactions to Ticlopidine
Adverse reactions to ticlopidine were not uncommon. Among the
first 489 patients who were contacted at 2 and 4 weeks after the
procedure and carefully questioned regarding side effects to
medications, ticlopidine was discontinued in 9 patients (1.8%) due to
a skin rash in 6, diarrhea in 2, and nausea in 1. One of these patients
developed stent thrombosis 2 days after cessation of ticlopidine and
died. Milder side effects believed to be due to ticlopidine but not
requiring its discontinuation occurred in 23 patients (4.7%),
including rash in 7, diarrhea in 8, and nausea in 9. Neutropenia did
not occur in any patient.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time Course of Stent Endothelialization
Studies in which serial angioscopy was performed after
successful coronary stent implantation suggest that complete
endothelialization did not occur in at least some
patients until 4 to 6 weeks after stent placement.15
Animal studies have also revealed that
endothelialization of the stent may not be complete at
2 weeks. These studies would suggest that the risk of stent thrombosis
may persist for
12 weeks.16
Absence of Late Stent Thrombosis in Patients Treated With Aspirin
and Ticlopidine
Stent thrombosis occurring >14 days after stent deployment
appears to be very rare in patients treated with aspirin and
ticlopidine. A randomized study2 comparing the use of
aspirin and ticlopidine with aspirin and warfarin in 517 patients
treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents, in whom an excellent angiographic
result was achieved, revealed a significantly lower frequency of
adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days in the aspirin
and ticlopidinetreated patients (1.6% versus 6.2%;
P=0.01). No patient in the aspirin and ticlopidine group had
stent thrombosis >4 days after stent placement; ticlopidine was
continued for 30 days in the present study. In another study,
patients receiving Palmaz-Schatz stents in whom an excellent
angiographic result was achieved were randomized to receive either
aspirin, aspirin and warfarin, or aspirin and ticlopidine for 4
weeks.3 Clinically evident stent closure (a
hierarchical composite end point that included death, emergency bypass
surgery, and Q-wave myocardial infarction and repeat
revascularization) within 30 days occurred in
3.6%, 2.4%, and 0.6% of patients, respectively.3 Stent
thrombosis did not occur in any patient >14 days after stent
placement. We have previously noted that in the first 761 patients who
had intracoronary stents placed at Mayo Clinic with the use of
high-pressure balloon inflations after stent deployment, in whom
aspirin and ticlopidine were administered for
4 weeks, stent
thrombosis did not occur in any patient >14 days after the stent
procedure.
The 95% CIs associated with our observation of no cases of late stent thrombosis in 827 patients are 0% to 0.5%. It is therefore very likely that the 1% risk of neutropenia associated with >2 weeks of ticlopidine therapy is more than twice the risk of stent thrombosis when ticlopidine is discontinued after 2 weeks. Larger studies are needed to confirm that the risk of stent thrombosis is as low as it appears to be in the present study.
Ticlopidine
Although the exact mechanism of action of ticlopidine
remains unknown, it is known that ticlopidine interferes with
ADP-induced platelet-fibrinogen binding and
platelet-platelet interactions.9 The effect on
platelet function is irreversible for the life of the
platelet.9 Ticlopidine has been shown to reduce acute
closure during balloon angioplasty in placebo-controlled trials and to
reduce coronary stent thrombosis compared with treatment with
aspirin alone and aspirin with warfarin.2 3 17 18 Side
effects from ticlopidine are relatively common, the most serious of
which is neutropenia, which occurs in 1% of patients treated for >2
weeks.10 11 12
Neutropenia has not been reported in a patient treated with ticlopidine for only 2 weeks. In the present study, white blood cell counts were measured 2 and 4 weeks after stent placement; however, because ticlopidine-induced neutropenia usually resolves quickly after ticlopidine is discontinued, it is not clear whether there is sufficient risk to monitor the white blood cell count in patients in whom only 2 weeks of ticlopidine therapy is planned.
Risk-Benefit Analysis of Discontinuing Ticlopidine Therapy
After 2 Weeks
Even if stent thrombosis is found in larger studies to occur
occasionally in patients in whom ticlopidine is stopped after 2 weeks,
it is likely to occur in <1% of patients, which is the reported
incidence of ticlopidine-induced neutropenia. An additional benefit of
discontinuing ticlopidine therapy after 2 weeks is that the practice
will reduce patient discomfort and the expense associated with the need
to monitor the white blood cell count in patients treated for longer
periods, as well as the expense of the medication itself.
Limitations of the Study
It is possible that subclinical stent thrombosis may have occurred
in some patients; angiography was not performed in patients without
symptoms or signs of coronary ischemia. Therefore, it
is possible, although unlikely, that the reported frequency of stent
thrombosis may be an underestimate if any subclinical cases of stent
thrombosis occurred.
Summary
The results of the present study suggest that ticlopidine can
be safely discontinued 14 days after coronary stent
implantation. The risk of stent thrombosis in the 15th through 30th
days after stent placement when ticlopidine is discontinued after 14
days (0% in the present study) appears to be less than the 1%
risk of ticlopidine-induced neutropenia when ticlopidine is continued
for >2 weeks.
Received August 6, 1998; revision received September 18, 1998; accepted September 23, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. T. Newsome, R. S. Weller, J. C. Gerancher, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster Coronary Artery Stents: II. Perioperative Considerations and Management Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 570 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Developed in Collaboration With the American Socie, WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 685 - 712. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): 1707 - 1732. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1971 - 1996. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Harrington and R. M. Califf Late Ischemic Events After Clopidogrel Cessation Following Drug-Eluting Stenting: Should We Be Worried? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.10.025v2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Spertus, R. Kettelkamp, C. Vance, C. Decker, P. G. Jones, J. S. Rumsfeld, J. C. Messenger, S. Khanal, E. D. Peterson, R. G. Bach, et al. Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Premature Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: Results From the PREMIER Registry Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): 2803 - 2809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Buresly, M. J. Eisenberg, X. Zhang, and L. Pilote Bleeding Complications Associated With Combinations of Aspirin, Thienopyridine Derivatives, and Warfarin in Elderly Patients Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, April 11, 2005; 165(7): 784 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Wilson, P. Fasseas, J. L. Orford, R. J. Lennon, T. Horlocker, N. E. Charnoff, S. Melby, and P. B. Berger Clinical outcome of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the two months following coronary stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 234 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Berger and S. Steinhubl Clinical Implications of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (PCI-CURE) Study: A US Perspective Circulation, October 22, 2002; 106(17): 2284 - 2287. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Taniuchi, H. I. Kurz, and J. M. Lasala Randomized Comparison of Ticlopidine and Clopidogrel After Intracoronary Stent Implantation in a Broad Patient Population Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 539 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schuhlen, A. Kastrati, J.u. Pache, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig Incidence of thrombotic occlusion and major adverse cardiac events between two and four weeks after coronary stent placement: analysis of 5,678 patients with a four-week ticlopidine regimen J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2066 - 2073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Popma, E. M. Ohman, J. Weitz, A. M. Lincoff, R. A. Harrington, and P. Berger Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 321S - 336S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brodison, R. Katira, R. S More, and A. Chauhan Current practice: Antiplatelet use in interventional cardiology Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2000; 76(892): 70 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Henry, F. Beverelli, P. B. Berger, M. R. Bell, D. Hasdai, D. R. Holmes Jr, S. Melby, and D. Grill Safety and Efficacy of Ticlopidine After Stent Placement • Response Circulation, January 25, 2000; 101 (3): e46 - e47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Berger, M. R. Bell, C. S. Rihal, H. Ting, G. Barsness, K. Garratt, V. Bellot, V. Mathew, S. Melby, L. Hammes, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticlopidine after intracoronary stent placement J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 1891 - 1894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Costa, M. Sabate, W. J. van der Giessen, I. P. Kay, P. Cervinka, J. M. R. Ligthart, P. Serrano, V. L. M. A. Coen, P. C. Levendag, and P. W. Serruys Late Coronary Occlusion After Intracoronary Brachytherapy Circulation, August 24, 1999; 100(8): 789 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Chambers, S. T Riebel, and M. Kozak Interventional Cardiology: Advances in Percutaneous Techniques for the Treatment of Cardiac Disease Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 1999; 3(2): 109 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |