(Circulation. 1999;99:2784-2790.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Y.G., M.E., M.K.) and The University of Tennessee, Departments of Surgery, Microbiology, and Immunology (Y.G., M.E., M.K.), Memphis; the Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo (A.K.) and Alexandria University (A.G., S.Z., S.K.), Egypt; and the Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley (G.T.).
Correspondence to Malak Kotb, PhD, University of Tennessee, Memphis, 956 Court Ave, Suite A202, Memphis, TN 38163. E-mail mkotb{at}utmem1.utmem.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsClass II allele/haplotype distribution was determined in 2 groups of RHD patients (n=88) and a control group (n=59). Patients were divided into the mitral valve disease (MVD) category (ie, those with mitral regurgitation with or without mitral stenosis) and the multivalvular lesions (MVL) category, with impairment of aortic and/or tricuspid valves in addition to mitral valve damage. The MVD category (n=65) accounted for 74% of patients and included significantly fewer recurrent RF episodes compared with MVL patients (P=0.002).
ConclusionsSignificant increases in DRB1*0701 and DQA1*0201 alleles and DRB1*0701-DQA1*0201 haplotypes were found in patients. Removal of the MVL patients from analysis increased the strength of HLA associations among the MVD sample. The frequency of DQA1*0103 allele was decreased and the DQB1*0603 allele was absent from the patient group, suggesting that these alleles may confer protective effects against RHD. DQ alleles in linkage disequilibrium with DR alleles appear to influence risk/protection effect: whereas the DRB1*13DQA1*0501-3DQB1*0301 haplotype showed a trend toward risk, the DRB1*13-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0603 haplotype was absent in the RHD sample. Our data indicate that certain class II alleles/haplotypes are associated with risk or protection from RHD and that these associations appear to be stronger and more consistent when analyzed in patients with relatively more homogeneous clinical manifestations.
Key Words: rheumatic heart disease antigens genetics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have suggested that genetic susceptibility to RF and RHD is linked to HLA class II alleles.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 However, there has been an apparent discrepancy as to the nature of susceptibility and/or protective alleles. This may have been partly because the majority of investigations used less accurate serological HLA typing methods that can generate false results and fail to discriminate between allelic subgroups. Ethnic differences in the distribution of HLA alleles and the contribution of other genes that could display, in different populations, distinct linkage disequilibrium patterns with HLA DR or DQ alleles may also have contributed to these apparent discrepancies. Another confounding problem was the failure of some studies to separate RF patients with and without carditis or to differentiate between subcategories of RHD for analysis of genetic susceptibility to RHD. Few studies have attempted to analyze the HLA class II associations with specific clinical forms of RHD.14 20 The question remains as to whether an association between class II allotype and RHD actually exists, and if so, whether it varies for different ethnic groups or is consistent among patients who share the same pattern of valve lesions regardless of their ethnic origin.
RF is an inflammatory condition that can have different manifestations, including polyarthritis, chorea, and carditis.24 In most countries, the incidence of carditis in RF patients ranges from 30% to 90%, and the majority of RF patients with carditis develop RHD.25 In Egypt, for example, the incidence of carditis among RF patients is 60%, and >90% of carditis patients develop RHD.25 Genetic associations are more likely to be detected in clinically homogeneous groups of patients, and thus it is important to separate carditis patients from patients with other RF sequelae but without carditis. Failure to do so may mask important genetic associations by inclusion of clinically heterogeneous groups. We noted that in studies in which RF patients with carditis were analyzed separately from other RF sequelae or in which only RHD patients, the majority of whom had mitral valve disease (MVD), were studied, the reported HLA associations were rather similar.13 14 15 16 18 23
Based on the above observations, we hypothesized that HLA class II associations with RHD may be more consistent if analyzed in patients with relatively homogeneous clinical outcome. We reasoned that by focusing on the RHD patients with documented patterns of mitral valve damage and a history of RF, we would be excluding RF patients without carditis and misdiagnosed patients with RF, which can skew the genetic analyses. Results of the present study support our hypothesis and indicate that certain HLA class II alleles and haplotypes are associated with risk/protection from RHD and that these associations are more evident in patients with MVD.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Internal review board approval (IRB 5938) was obtained for this study.
DNA Typing of HLA Class II Genes
DNA from whole blood of patients and control subjects was
extracted by the Chelex method.26 Low-resolution HLA-DR
typing for DRB1*01 through 18 as well as for DRB3 (DR52), DRB4 (DR53),
and DRB5 (DR51) was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with
amplification with sequence-specific primers,27 28 and 13
DNA control subjects provided by the 12th International
Histocompatibility Workshop (IHW) were used as test
references.29 DNA was amplified in a final 50 µL of 1x
PCR buffer (50 mmol/L KCl; 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3;
0.001% wt/vol gelatin); each reaction mixture contained 200
µmol/L of each dNTP, 0.4 µmol/L DR-specific primers, 0.2
µmol/L DR internal control primers, with 1.25 U Taq
polymerase (Promega) and 10 to 20 µL genomic DNA. Amplification
occurred for a total of 33 cycles with 1 minute each of denaturation at
95°C, annealing at 55°C, and extension at 72°C, with the last
cycle having an additional 6 minutes of extension at 72°C. PCR
products were separated on 2% agarose, the amplified bands were
visualized, and the DR type was deduced. High-resolution subtyping of
certain DRB1 and all DQB1 alleles was performed with the Innolipa
reverse hybridization typing system (Innogenetics) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.30
A nonradioactive oligotyping method was used to examine HLA-DQA1 polymorphism. Primers, probes, and procedures were those indicated in the 12th IHW protocols.29 Amplified DNA was immobilized on nylon membranes and hybridized with a panel of 19 digoxigenin-labeled probes. An antidigoxigeninalkaline phosphatase Fab antibody fragment (Boehringer Mannheim) was added and bound to any hybrid previously formed. Membranes were incubated with a chemiluminescent substrate (AMPPD, Boehringer Mannheim) and exposed briefly to x-ray films, and reactivity patterns were recorded from the autoradiograph and analyzed.
Statistical Analysis
HLA-DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 allele frequencies in patients and
healthy unrelated control subjects were compared. Typing of all 3 loci
was performed on all patients and control subjects, and haplotype
assignments were made with known patterns of linkage disequilibrium in
Caucasians31 32 and were confirmed by family-based
genotyping of 12 Egyptian families with 1 to 7 siblings, which
generated 11 haplotypes, confirming that the linkage disequilibrium
patterns observed were the same as those reported for
Caucasians.31 32 Allele and haplotype frequencies were
determined by the method of gene counting. Tests for differences in
predisposing and protective effects of HLA class II alleles,
haplotypes, and genotypes were performed by use of the odds
ratio (OR) method33 and the relative predispositional
effects (RPE) method.34 Statistical significance was
examined by Fisher's exact test. The strength of associations was
verified by the cross-validation method35 (ie, significant
associations found in RHD-1 or MVD-1 patients were cross-validated
against RHD-2 or MVD-2 patients, respectively). Cross-validation
against previous studies reporting the same association was also
performed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The DRB1*13 allele showed a trend toward a higher frequency in RHD patients compared with control subjects, whereas the DRB1*10, DRB1*02, and DRB1*11 alleles showed decreased frequencies, particularly in RHD-2 patients. However, neither of these effects was significant or cross-validated, even with RPE analysis after removal of DRB1*0701.
Frequency of DQA1 and DQB1 Alleles in RHD Patients and
Control Subjects
A possible protective effect of DQA1*0103 was seen (Table 2
); the frequency of this allele was
lower in all RHD patients than in control subjects
(P=0.048), with significantly negative association found in
the RHD-2 (P=0.001) but not in RHD-1 patients. The strength
of the negative association between the DQA1*0103 allele and RHD
was increased when the MVD group was analyzed separately
(P=0.016) and was strongest in the MVD-2 group
(P=0.002), but it was not cross-validated with MVD-1
patients.
|
An increased frequency of DQA1*0201 was seen among patients. The
association of DQA1*0201 with risk was stronger in the MVD category
(P=0.013), and its significance was cross-validated in the
MVD-1 (P=0.03) and MVD-2 (P=0.04) groups (Table 2
).
RPE analysis failed to reveal further associations
after removal of either DQA1*0103 or DQA1*0201 alleles from the
analysis. No significant association with either risk or
protection was found in the MVL patients; however, the DQA1*0401
allele showed a trend toward increased frequency in this group.
Similarly, although the DQA1*0601 allele was completely absent in
MVD-1 and MVD-2 patients, it was found with a 3-fold higher frequency
in MVL patients than in control subjects (P=NS). The
DQB1*0601 allele was absent from only the RHD-2 group
(P=0.02) and thus the MVD-2 (P=0.03).
Interestingly, the DQB1*0603 allele was completely absent in all
patient groups, including patients with MVL, whereas its frequency was
5% in control subjects (P=0.004 for all RHD and 0.01 for
MVD, Table 3
). This suggests a protective
effect for this allele in RHD.
|
DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 Haplotypes Associated With RHD
The DRB1*0701-DQA1*0201 haplotype in this population was in
linkage disequilibrium with either the DQB1*0201 or DQB1*0303
alleles and was significantly increased in the combined RHD
(P=0.018) and the RHD-2 group (P=0.01), Table 4
. This association was stronger in the
MVD group (P=0.004) and was cross-validated between the
MVD-1 (P=0.012) and the MVD-2 (P=0.018) groups.
Predisposing effects of DRB1*0701DQA1*0201DQB1*0201-2/*0303
haplotypes may have been conferred by DRB1*0701 and/or DQA1*0201
alleles, which were significantly associated with risk in MVD
patients.
|
The frequency of DRB1*13DQA1*0501-3DQB1*0301 was higher in all
patient categories and was significantly increased in the combined RHD
sample (OR=3, P=0.04), Table 4
. Removal of the MVL
patients increased the strength of this association in the MVD group
(P=0.03), with a higher association found in the MVD-2 group
(P=0.02). Failure to cross-validate the trend for a
predisposing effect of this haplotype may have been related to the
sample size. High-resolution subtyping revealed that DRB1*13
suballeles found on this susceptibility haplotype were DRB1*1303,
*1304, *1307, *1310, and *1314.
Interestingly, the DRB1*13-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0603 haplotype was completely
absent in all patient groups, whereas its frequency was 4% in control
subjects (P=0.009), Table 4
. The DRB1*13
suballeles found on this protective haplotype were DRB1*1301,
*1308, and *1316. The trend for a protective effect of this haplotype
may have been conferred by the DQA1*0103 and/or DQB1*0603 alleles,
which were individually associated with protection (Tables 2
and 3
). The trend toward protective association with the
DRB1*15-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0601 haplotype found in patients from Alexandria
(RHD-2/MVD-2) but not Cairo was unexpected because of the ethnic
homogeneity between these geographically proximal cities. It is also
possible that certain genetic elements are associated with RHD
regardless of ethnicity or strain of streptococcus, whereas other
elements may be sensitive to differences in the serotypes of
streptococcal strains circulating in different communities.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The findings of our study (summarized in Table 6
) underscore the importance of analyzing
genetic association with disease in clinically homogeneous
patients by molecular methods. If we focus on RHD patients with MVD,
there is a high likelihood that these patients had carditis during
their RF attack, and thus misdiagnosed patients or those with other
categories of RF without carditis, who may mask genetic associations
with RHD, would be excluded from the analysis. This
distinction was particularly important in our study because as many as
40% of RF patients in Egypt are without carditis,25 and
this group would have masked the associations detected here.
Furthermore, we believe that analysis of MVD and MVL patients
separately increases the clinical homogeneity of patients. Indeed, our
study shows that HLA associations were stronger when the MVL group was
excluded from the analysis. Interestingly, the MVD patients
experienced a significant 5-fold fewer acute recurrent RF episodes
compared with the MVL patients, with mean rates of RF
recurrence of 0.7 and 3.3, respectively
(P=0.002).
|
In accordance with our hypothesis, studies in which RHD patients were
analyzed separately from RF without carditis15 18
and in which the MVD category accounted for the majority of
cases13 14 16 23 seem to have found similar class II
associations with RHD, and these are consistent with the
findings reported here (Tables 5
and 6
). For example,
increased frequencies of DRB1*0701 (DR7), DRB1*0301 (DR3), DR6, and
DQB1*0201 alleles were found in RHD patients from different ethnic
groups.13 14 16 18 23 Consistent with these
studies, we found a significant increase in the frequency of the
DRB1*0701 allele in RHD patients (P=0.007), and this
association with risk was even stronger when analysis was
focused on the MVD group (P=0.002). Similarly, the entire
DRB1*0701-DQA1*0201 haplotype was significantly associated with risk in
our entire RHD sample (particularly in combination with DQB1*0201-2),
and the strongest association with this haplotype was found in the MVD
category (P=0.004). This association was cross-validated in
our MVD-1 and MVD-2 samples and also against previous studies in which
the majority of patients had MVD.13 16 18
Interesting trends and associations were also clustered around the DR6-related haplotypes. The DR6 antigen has 2 phenotypic splits encoded by the DRB1*13 or DRB1*14 alleles, each with several subtypes. In our study, the DRB1*13DQA1*0501-3DQB1*0301 haplotype showed a trend toward association with risk and was significantly increased in patients with MVD. By contrast, the DRB1*13-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0603 haplotype was absent in all patient groups, which suggested a protective influence of this haplotype. An association between DR6 haplotypes and RHD was also reported in other studies.14 23 Koyanagi et al14 reported a high frequency of the DRB1*1405-DQA1*0104-DQB1*0503 haplotype in Japanese RHD patients with predominant MVD. A high frequency of DR6 was found in blacks from South Africa23 (60% with MVD). Interestingly, a negative association between RHD and DR6 was reported in the Utah study22 ; however, because serological typing was performed and thus no information on DR6 splits, suballeles, or haplotypes was provided, it is possible that the negative association with DR6 was conferred by the DRB1*13-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0603 haplotype, which in our study is showing a protective trend. Therefore, depending on the DR6 splits (DR13 or DR14) or the DRB1*13/DRB1*14 suballeles and the nature of additional elements present on the same haplotype (ie, DQA and DQB alleles), the DR6 haplotypes may either exert risk or confer protection from RHD.
More than 1 predisposing allele and haplotype were detected in our study. Although individual alleles on risk haplotypes were significantly associated with RHD, we should not rule out the possibility that other genetic elements on these haplotypes may be more directly involved in disease susceptibility. In the MVD group, the frequencies of DRB1*0701-DQA1*0201DQB1*0201-2/0303 and DRB1*13DQA1*0501-3DQB1*0301 haplotypes were 22% and 10%, compared with 9% and 3% in control subjects, respectively. These levels of frequencies reported here as well as in Japanese14 and Mexican13 patients are to be expected for autoimmune diseases of infectious origin in which variations in the microorganismsin this case differences in serotype of group A streptococcal strainsmay influence outcome. Inasmuch as different microbe-derived autoimmunogenic peptides may be differentially presented by distinct alleles, HLA associations may become more evident if sorted by the nature of peptide binding motifs.37 38
In analyzing the role of class II alleles/haplotypes in various diseases, it is important to consider that protective associations are equally, if not more, relevant than predisposing associations. For example, DQB1*0302 and DQB1*0201, which pose a strong risk in insulin-dependent diabetes, lack the protective Asp57 found in DQB1*0301, DQB1*0303, and DQB1*0401 alleles and especially in DQB1*0602, which confers protection even among relatives of insulin-dependent diabetes.39 HLA alleles regulate immune responses to infections,35 bind and present autoantigens with different affinities, play a role in T-cell repertoire selection,40 and may themselves be target autoantigens.39 41 42 Differential presentation of autoimmune peptides by protective and nonprotective or susceptibility alleles can have major effects on the development of pathogenic autoimmunity. Future structure function studies may reveal mechanisms by which certain alleles (eg, DQB1*0603) and the DRB1*13-DQA1*0103-DQB1*0603 haplotype may confer protection in RHD.
In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that apparent discrepancies among some studies investigating HLA class II associations with RHD might have been due, in part, to an inappropriate grouping of RF with and without carditis and/or heterogeneous clinical subgroups of RHD patients. It should be noted that the results from our study showing that the DRB1*0701-, DR6-, and DQB1*0201-related haplotypes confer susceptibility to MVD are in agreement with those reported for populations of Turkish,16 Mexican,13 South African,23 and Japanese14 RHD patients, in whom the MVD category constituted the majority of cases (>50%). The data presented here suggest that the identification of class II allele haplotypes may provide an insight into the molecular mechanism of the disease and may be a useful tool in predicting the clinical outcome in RF patients, thereby affording new means of intervention or vaccine design.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 22, 1998; revision received February 19, 1999; accepted March 16, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Nooh, N. El-Gengehi, R. Kansal, C. S. David, and M. Kotb HLA Transgenic Mice Provide Evidence for a Direct and Dominant Role of HLA Class II Variation in Modulating the Severity of Streptococcal Sepsis J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 3076 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. J. Ellis, Y. Li, W. Hildebrand, V. A. Fischetti, and M. W. Cunningham T Cell Mimicry and Epitope Specificity of Cross-Reactive T Cell Clones from Rheumatic Heart Disease J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 5448 - 5456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Guilherme, S. E. Oshiro, K. C. Fae, E. Cunha-Neto, G. Renesto, A. C. Goldberg, A. C. Tanaka, P. M. A Pomerantzeff, M. H. Kiss, C. Silva, et al. T-Cell Reactivity against Streptococcal Antigens in the Periphery Mirrors Reactivity of Heart-Infiltrating T Lymphocytes in Rheumatic Heart Disease Patients Infect. Immun., September 1, 2001; 69(9): 5345 - 5351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Cunningham Pathogenesis of Group A Streptococcal Infections Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2000; 13(3): 470 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Guilherme, N. Dulphy, C. Douay, V. Coelho, E. Cunha-Neto, S. E. Oshiro, R. V Assis, A. C. Tanaka, P. M. Alberto Pomerantzeff, D. Charron, et al. Molecular evidence for antigen-driven immune responses in cardiac lesions of rheumatic heart disease patients Int. Immunol., July 1, 2000; 12(7): 1063 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |