(Circulation. 1999;99:2871-2875.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Cardiology (D.B., U.G., J.L.) and the Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Radiopharmacy and Nuclear Medicine (G.N., J.H., R.W.), Heart Center Northrhine-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Correspondence to Priv-Doz Dr Med D. Baller, Kardiologische Klinik, Herzzentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, Deutschland, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe noninvasively investigated 23 consecutive patients (18 men, 5 women; mean age, 56±7.6 years) with a mean LDL level of 165±34 mg/dL at baseline by PET for myocardial blood flow measurement with [13N]ammonia at rest and under dipyridamole stress (0.56 mg/kg) before and after lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin for 6 months. Between baseline and the 6-month follow-up, total cholesterol concentration fell from 241±44 to 168±34 mg/dL, and the LDL level decreased from 165±34 to 95±26 mg/dL (P<0.001). Overall, coronary flow reserve increased from 2.2±0.6 to 2.64±0.6 (P<0.01). Maximal coronary flow increased significantly from 182±36 to 238±58 mL/minx100 g (P<0.001) at follow-up. Minimum coronary resistance declined significantly from 0.51±0.12 to 0.40±0.14 mm Hg · mL-1 · minx100 g (P<0.001). Concomitantly, a regression of anginal symptoms was observed in most patients.
ConclusionsOur results suggest that cholesterol-lowering therapy with simvastatin may improve overall coronary vasodilator capacity assessed noninvasively by PET in patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. Consequently, intensive lipid-lowering therapy is considered a vasoprotective treatment for selected patients in very early stages of coronary atherosclerosis with the potential of preventing further disease progression.
Key Words: hypercholesterolemia coronary flow reserve tomography atherosclerosis drugs
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30%, called "minimal
disease." Further clinical and demographic data are presented
in the Table
25% (<30% limit). Saturated fatty acid content was
aimed to be at least <30% of total fat intake. Laboratory test values
were checked under outpatient conditions after 4 weeks to detect
potential side effects of simvastatin medication and to
check the lipid values. In addition, cardiac symptoms were carefully
recorded with a standardized questionnaire. After being
comprehensively informed, all patients consented to the study protocol,
which had been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical School
of the University of Bochum. Exclusion criteria were pretreatment
lipid-lowering drugs, unstable angina, uncontrolled hypertension,
smoking, diabetes mellitus, dilated cardiomyopathy,
significant echocardiographic left
ventricular hypertrophy, and severe concomitant
internal diseases. Hemodynamic values of left
ventricular function were within normal limits according to
invasive and noninvasive criteria. Because some patients were
pretreated with various antianginal and antihypertensive drugs, study
patients were allowed to continue their medication without change
during the follow-up period. However, all vasoactive medications were
discontinued
12 to 24 hours before the patients underwent PET. In
detail, 7 patients received ß-blocking agents, 2 were given calcium
antagonists, and 1 received ACE inhibitor and
nitrate. Three patients were on long-term low-dose aspirin
medication.
|
Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow by PET
Coronary vasodilation capacity was determined PET after
any potentially vasoactive concomitant medication was discontinued for
12 to 24 hours and without uptake of methyl xanthine or caffeine
before the investigation. The technique of measurement, time sequence,
and evaluation of the method for quantitative determination of
myocardial perfusion in milliliters per minute and tissue unit have
been validated and described in detail in both animal experiments and
humans.12 13 Dynamic PET with a Siemens/ECAT-951/R scanner
was carried out after administration of 370 to 555 MBq of
[13N]ammonia as a slow bolus over 30 seconds
under resting conditions and after coronary vasodilation with
dipyridamole. Directly after transmission acquisition,
a dynamic emission scan was performed with a sequence of 19 frames over
a total acquisition period of 10 minutes according to the following
frame durations: twelve 10-second frames followed by five 30-second,
two 120-second, and one 300-second frame. Image reconstruction and
analysis included correction of tissue attenuation for emission
data and reorientation of transversal slices in short-axis slices.
Blood pressure was measured automatically and oscillometrically (Boso
Oscillomat) during data acquisition at 2-minute intervals. ECG and
heart rate were registered in parallel. Myocardial perfusion was
calculated and analyzed analogously to the method of Hutchins
et al.12 For determination of regional myocardial
perfusion, the respective arterial and myocardial
time-activity curves over the ventricular cavity and over 8
myocardial segments were determined on a region-of-interest basis by 2
septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior segments from
representative short-axis sections. A small region of
interest was assigned to the right ventricular blood pool
to obtain an appropriate input function. Afterward, the regional and
mean blood flows were calculated by use of a 3-compartment tracer
kinetic model that was described in detail
previously.12 13 Because a metabolic
correction of flow values for [13N] metabolites
seems negligible according to previous investigations,13
this determination of metabolites was not performed, although minor
error cannot be excluded. Written results of coronary flow
variables were documented by blinded nuclear medical
investigators.
Determination of Coronary Flow Capacity With
Dipyridamole
The dipyridamole test14 was applied
for pharmacological recruitment of the maximum inducible vasodilation
capacity in the standard dosage of 0.56 mg/kg body weight over a
4-minute intravenous infusion. The
dipyridamole approach cannot be regarded as entirely
independent of the endothelium in view of its
adenosine-mediated mechanism.9 15 16 17 18 19 The
following parameters of coronary vasodilation
capacity were determined: maximum
dipyridamole-inducible coronary blood flow
(MCF), minimum coronary vascular resistance (MCR) calculated
approximately from the ratio of mean arterial perfusion
pressure to dipyridamole flow, and instantaneous CFR
calculated as the ratio of dipyridamole to basal flow.
Mean aortic perfusion pressure was calculated according to the standard
formula: minimum diastolic arterial pressure
plus one third of blood pressure amplitude. With regard to noninvasive
calculation of MCR, aortic perfusion pressure was not subtracted from
diastolic left ventricular opposing pressure
because the quantitative influence of the myocardial or extravascular
component of resistance can largely be neglected when left
ventricular function and end-diastolic
pressures are within normal limits.20
Coronary Angiography
High-resolution coronary angiograms were performed with
the Judkins technique and the percutaneous femoral
approach on a Siemens instrument (digital image processing HICOR 3.0,
Polydoros IS-C) with an integrated unit for measuring vessel widths
quantitatively. Coronary angiograms were judged with regard to
smooth appearance, luminal wall irregularities, and epicardial local or
diffuse caliber reduction and stenosis, respectively, by 2
experienced investigators. Coronary arteries were classified as
normal if there was neither a discrete stenosis nor wall
irregularities.
Laboratory Measurements
Serum lipids and lipoproteins were measured from fasting venous
blood at baseline and at the end of the study period (6 months). In
detail, total cholesterol was measured by the
cholesterol esterasecholesterol oxidase
method (Beckman Instruments); HDL was determined by prior precipitating
of VLDL and LDL particles with phosphotungstic acid and magnesium ions
(Boehringer Mannheim). For LDL determination, LDL particles
were precipitated by polyvinylsulfate (Boehringer Mannheim).
LDL was then calculated as the difference between total
cholesterol and cholesterol measured in the
supernatant. Plasma fibrinogen concentration was determined according
to the functional method of Clauss.21
Statistical Analysis
For statistical analysis with the StatView 4.57
software package, mean values and SDs were calculated for all
variables. Student's paired t tests were used for
comparison of lipid and coronary parameters before
and after study intervention. Statistical significance was assumed when
the null hypothesis could be rejected at P=0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Changes in Coronary Hemodynamics
Overall, CFR increased from 2.2±0.6 to 2.64±0.6
(P<0.01) during the study period. MCF increased
significantly from 182±36 mL/minx100 g at baseline to 238±58
mL/minx100 g (P<0.001) at follow-up. MCR decreased
significantly from 0.51±0.12 to 0.40±0.14 mm Hg ·
mL-1 · minx100 g
(P<0.001) at the 6-month follow-up. The main determinants
of coronary vasodilator capacity are summarized in the
Figure
for the total number of patients before and after
lipid-lowering therapy.
|
Changes in Clinical Characteristics
Sixty-five percent of the total number of patients (15 of 23) were
free of cardiac symptoms after lipid-lowering therapy, and no patient
complained of typical effort angina. Eight patients still reported
atypical angina pectoris. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
medication was tolerated well as a whole. Only 1 patient developed
transient myalgia without a significant increase in
creatinine kinase.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angina Pectoris With Normal or Near-Normal Coronary
Angiograms
The syndrome of angina despite a normal coronary
angiogram, often called syndrome X, includes several subgroups of
patients with different pathophysiological
mechanisms leading to anginal pain.22 23 24 However,
increasing evidence2 3 4 5 suggests that patients with angina
pectoris and a still-normal epicardial angiogram or only
minimally affected coronary vessels but restricted CFR who
undergo angiography because of suspected CHD may already have a mainly
functional early stage in the natural development of coronary
sclerosis on the basis of risk factors.2 3 Furthermore, it
cannot be ruled out that local or diffuse intimal lesions of
epicardiovascular regions would already have been
detected with intravascular ultrasound in these patients, although
endothelial dysfunction may precede the
ultrasonographic detection of wall lesions.25 With
reference to some of our patients with normal angiograms, in patients
without angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease, a
correlation between the number or coronary risk factors and
loss of endothelium-dependent vasodilation has been
reported.26 In this regard, Seiler and
coworkers27 demonstrated that
hypercholesterolemia causes a reduction in
exercise-induced vasodilation in patients with normal coronary
angiograms. In addition, transient myocardial perfusion abnormalities
on exercise testing suggesting myocardial ischemia have been
observed in patients with angina, coronary
endothelial dysfunction of resistance vessels, and
normal or near-normal coronary arteriograms.28
Impact of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy on
Coronary Vasodilator Function in Previous Trials
Egashira et al6 demonstrated an improvement in
coronary endothelial vasomotor function in both
epicardial and resistance vessels after 6 months of treatment with
pravastatin in patients with marked
hypercholesterolemia (mean LDL
cholesterol, 195±25 mg/dL) and CHD. Leung et
al29 described an improvement in epicardial
coronary vasomotor responses to intracoronary
acetylcholine in men with hypercholesterolemia
(mean LDL 219±35 mg/dL) and angiographically normal coronary
arteries after 6 months of cholesterol-reducing diet and
cholestyramine. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
trial, Treasure and coworkers8 showed that lipid-lowering
therapy (diet and lovastatin) had no effect on
coronary endothelial function in the short term
(12 days) but improved coronary vasomotion in the longer term
(5.5 months) in patients with only mild
hypercholesterolemia (mean LDL, 148±7 mg/dL)
and symptomatic CHD. Anderson and colleagues7
demonstrated in a randomized study that a combined regimen of
lipid-lowering diet and antioxidant therapy consisting of
lovastatin and probucol significantly improved
endothelium-dependent vasodilator responses to
acetylcholine in patients with coronary
atherosclerosis and a baseline LDL of 145±37 mg/dL on
average after 1 year of therapy. Finally, Gould et al,9
using PET to evaluate myocardial perfusion for the first time,
suggested that lipid-lowering therapy may have beneficial effects on
the integrative dipyridamole-induced coronary
flow capacity in patients with CHD and marked
hypercholesterolemia (mean LDL level, 213±79
mg/dL) after 3 months of therapy (diet combined with
lovastatin and cholestyramine).
Possible Pathophysiological Mechanisms
An improvement in CFR by regression of structural vascular changes
appears very improbable owing to the small time span in our patient
population with still-normal or only slightly altered coronary
angiograms. Several components may contribute to impaired vasodilation
under conditions of relative LDL
hypercholesterolemia. In this regard, an
increased production of superoxide anions by oxidized LDL seems
to be a major mechanism.30 31 In addition, reduced
expression of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase by
oxidized LDL may also be involved.32 Moreover, oxidized
LDL potentiates the effect of vasoconstrictor hormones.33
In humans, hypercholesterolemia leads to
endothelial dysfunction of both the epicardial vessels
and the coronary resistance vessels in the
microcirculation.2 3 6 This disturbance of basal
and metabolic regulation of vascular tonus may occur a long
time before angiographically visible stenoses and can be
corrected, at least partially, in the resistance vessels by
administration of L-arginine.34 The precise
mechanism of the moderate improvement in integrative coronary
vasodilation capacity after effective lipid-lowering that we documented
with PET has not been clarified. However, at present it may be
assumed that the major pathophysiological mechanism
is probably an increase in vasoactive NO bioavailability. In this
regard, in a recent randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study,
an increased bioavailability of NO after lipid-lowering therapy was
reported for the first time in patients with
hypercholesterolemia (LDL
160 mg/dL) after
6-month treatment with fluvastatin.35 In
addition, newer findings suggest that the HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor simvastatin might have beneficial
effects on atherosclerosis beyond that attributed to
the lowering of LDL cholesterol by direct upregulation of
endothelial NO synthase activity.36
The dipyridamole-recruitable CFR represents an integrative marker of both smooth muscle relaxation of resistance vessels and, at least in part, endothelial function resulting from NO-mediated flow-dependent vasodilation.15 16 17 18 19 It thus approximately reflects the entire coronary vasodilation capacity.9 15 Detection of abnormal CFR in patients with risk factors and still-absent or only minimal changes in coronary angiogram may be considered a manifestation of a functional disorder of vascular tonus regulation in the early stage of coronary sclerosis.4 In our patient group, improvement in coronary vasodilation capacity after intensive lipid lowering might have resulted from an increase in flow-dependent vasodilation in small resistance arteries of microcirculation and possibly in epicardial vessels after initial dipyridamole-induced flow enhancement. Although endothelial function was not specifically tested in our noninvasive study, improvement in endothelial function may have contributed to an increase in flow-mediated endothelial-dependent dilation in response to the initial increase in flow caused by the direct action of dipyridamole,37 similar to improvements in myocardial perfusion during dipyridamole-PET after cholesterol lowering in patients with CHD studied by Gould and coworkers.9
Study Limitations
The absence of a nontreated placebo group must be mentioned.
However, with current knowledge about the atherogenic and
vasoconstrictive effects of LDL
hypercholesterolemia, inclusion of a
sufficiently large placebo group of patients even at the beginning of
coronary atherosclerosis hardly seems justified
when the radiopharmaceutical loading caused by repeated nuclear
radiation during several PET studies in a relatively short time frame
also is taken into account. Consequently, such a placebo-controlled
study would not have been accepted by the ethics committee. Instead,
each patient served as his or her own control.
Conclusions
The results of our study indicate that
cholesterol-lowering therapy with principally HMG-CoA
reductase inhibition for an average of 6 months improves the
integrative dipyridamole-recruitable CFR in most
patients with mild to moderate
hypercholesterolemia at very early,
predominantly functional stages of coronary
atherosclerosis. Consequently, intensive lipid-lowering
therapy may contribute to functional reversal of impaired CFR, leading
to a potential reduction in the risk of myocardial
ischemia,38 with concomitant regression of anginal
symptoms and possibly prevention of further disease progression.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 12, 1999; revision received March 19, 1999; accepted March 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J Knuuti and F M Bengel Positron emission tomography and molecular imaging Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 360 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. van der Harst, A. A. Voors, W. H. van Gilst, M. Bohm, and D. J. van Veldhuisen Statins in the treatment of chronic heart failure: Biological and clinical considerations Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2006; 71(3): 443 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yokoyama, Y. Inoue, T. Moritan, K. Ohtomo, and R. Nagai Impaired myocardial vasodilatation during hyperaemic stress is improved by simvastatin but not by pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2004; 25(8): 671 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lethen and H. Lambertz Doppler echocardiographic assessment of coronary artery disease: a challenge becomes reality Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 5 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Balk, J. Lau, L. C. Goudas, H. S. Jordan, B. Kupelnick, L. U. Kim, and R. H. Karas Effects of Statins on Nonlipid Serum Markers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, October 21, 2003; 139(8): 670 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Szmitko, P. W.M. Fedak, R. D. Weisel, D. J. Stewart, M. J.B. Kutryk, and S. Verma Endothelial Progenitor Cells: New Hope for a Broken Heart Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3093 - 3100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wolfrum, K. S. Jensen, and J. K. Liao Endothelium-Dependent Effects of Statins Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Urbich, E. Dernbach, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler Double-Edged Role of Statins in Angiogenesis Signaling Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 737 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Pearson New Tools for Coronary Risk Assessment: What Are Their Advantages and Limitations? Circulation, February 19, 2002; 105(7): 886 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Fagret, C. Ghezzi, and G. Vanzetto 99mTc-N-NOET Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion: Can It Offer More Than We Already Have? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2001; 42(9): 1395 - 1396. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Amarenco Hypercholesterolemia, lipid-lowering agents, and the risk for brain infarction Neurology, September 1, 2001; 57(90002): S35 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Schwartz and M. G. Bourassa Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Angiograms Arch Intern Med, August 13, 2001; 161(15): 1825 - 1833. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, F. Y.J. Keng, T. Kudo, J. S. Sayre, and H. R. Schelbert Abnormal Longitudinal, Base-to-Apex Myocardial Perfusion Gradient by Quantitative Blood Flow Measurements in Patients With Coronary Risk Factors Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Forrester, C. N. Bairey-Merz, and S. Kaul The aggressive low density lipoprotein lowering controversy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Simons, R. O. Bonow, N. A. Chronos, D. J. Cohen, F. J. Giordano, H. K. Hammond, R. J. Laham, W. Li, M. Pike, F. W. Sellke, et al. Clinical Trials in Coronary Angiogenesis: Issues, Problems, Consensus : An Expert Panel Summary Circulation, September 12, 2000; 102 (11): e73 - e86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vasa, S. Fichtlscherer, K. Adler, A. Aicher, H. Martin, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler Increase in Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells by Statin Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, June 19, 2001; 103(24): 2885 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Urbich, E. Dernbach, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler Double-Edged Role of Statins in Angiogenesis Signaling Circ. Res., April 5, 2002; 90(6): 737 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |