(Circulation. 1999;99:896-902.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Medicine (E.H.S., C.D.A.S., J.C.T.M, P.M.T.W, A.J.M.D, R.O.B.G.) and Department of Surgery (J.A.R.), Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Institute for Cardiovascular Research-Vrije Universiteit (E.H.S., C.D.A.S., J.C.T.M., P.M.T.W., J.A.R., A.J.M.D., R.O.B.G.) Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to Dr Coen D.A. Stehouwer, Department of Medicine, Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail CDA.Stehouwer{at}AZVU.NL
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsBlood pressure was measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Videomicroscopy was used to measure skin capillary density and capillary recruitment after arterial occlusion. Skin blood flow responses after iontophoresis of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry. Insulin sensitivity correlated with 24-hour systolic blood pressure (24-hour SBP; r=-0.50, P<0.05). Capillary recruitment and acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation were strongly and positively related to insulin sensitivity (r=0.84, P<0.001; r=0.78, P<0.001, respectively), and capillary recruitment was inversely related to 24-hour SBP (r=-0.53, P<0.05). Waist-to-hip ratio showed strong associations with insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and the measures of microvascular function but did not confound the associations between these variables. Subsequent regression analysis showed that the association between insulin sensitivity and blood pressure was not independent of the estimates of microvascular function, and part of the variation in both blood pressure (R2=38%) and insulin sensitivity (R2=71%) could be explained by microvascular function.
ConclusionsInsulin sensitivity and blood pressure are associated well within the physiological range. Microvascular function strongly relates to both, consistent with a central role in linking these variables.
Key Words: hypertension insulin microcirculation capillaries endothelium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, perturbed microvascular vasodilator capacity may link elevated blood pressure with insulin resistance. To test this hypothesis, we assessed capillary density and recruitment as well as endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the skin microcirculation and analyzed the relation between these estimates of microvascular function and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and insulin sensitivity in a group of 18 healthy normotensive and glucose-tolerant subjects. Because the relations between insulin sensitivity and blood pressure may be confounded by obesity and body fat distribution,2 body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio were also determined.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Methods
Sensitivity to insulin-mediated glucose uptake was assessed by
the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp
technique, as described previously.14 Briefly, insulin
(Velosulin; Novo Nordisk) was infused in a primed continuous manner at
a rate of 50 mU kg-1 hr-1
for 2 hours. Normoglycemia was maintained by adjusting the rate of a
20% D-glucose infusion based on plasma glucose
measurements performed at 5-minute intervals. Whole-body glucose uptake
(M) was calculated from the glucose infusion rate during the last 60
minutes and expressed per unit of plasma insulin concentration (M/I).
Plasma insulin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay
techniques (Immunoradiometric Assay, Medgenix Diagnostics).
For convenience, the M/I ratio was multiplied by 100.
Microvascular measurements were conducted in a quiet, temperature-controlled room (T=23.4±0.4°C) after 30 minutes of acclimatization, with the subjects in the sitting position and the investigated, nondominant (in all cases, left) hand at heart level. Nailfold capillary studies and iontophoresis studies were performed on the same day. Subjects were asked to refrain from caffeine, alcohol-containing beverages, and meals for 4 hours preceding the test. During the tests, skin temperature was monitored and all subjects were studied at the same time of the day.
Nailfold capillaries in the dorsal skin of the third finger were visualized by a capillary microscope (Zeiss), linked to a television camera (Philips LDH 070/20), a video recorder (Blaupunkt RTV-915, S-VHS) and a monitor (Philips LDH 2135/10).15 Incident illumination was achieved by light from a 50-W vapor mercury lamp, which passes through a heat-absorption and heat-reflection filter, a polarizer, and a 50% mirror to illuminate the object. To visualize the capillaries, a 3.2x objective (Zeiss 3.2/0.07) was used with a total system magnification of 99x. Two separate visual fields were recorded before and after 4 minutes16 of arterial occlusion, each for 60 seconds, and the images were stored on videotape. Capillaries were counted using the naked eye from a freeze-framed reproduction of the videotape and from the running videotape, when it was uncertain whether a capillary was present or not. Capillary density was defined as the number of erythrocyte-perfused capillaries per square millimeter of nailfold skin. Percentage capillary recruitment was assessed by dividing the increase in capillary density after 4 minutes of arterial occlusion by the baseline capillary density. No knowledge of the subject's insulin sensitivity or blood pressure was available to the person counting the capillaries. The intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of variation of the counting procedure were 4.5% and 10.1%, respectively.
Endothelium-(in)dependent vasodilatation of finger skin microcirculation was evaluated by iontophoresis in combination with laser Doppler flowmetry.17 Laser Doppler flowmetry is a noninvasive method to measure skin perfusion. A laser beam penetrates the skin and a fraction of the light is backscattered by moving blood objects and undergoes a frequency shift according to the Doppler principle, generating a signal proportional to tissue perfusion.18 Laser Doppler flux was measured on the middle phalanx of the finger with the Periflux 4000 system (Perimed) and expressed as arbitrary perfusion units. Iontophoresis is a noninvasive method of drug application that allows the local transfer of charged substances across the skin by use of a small electric current.17 A battery-powered iontophoresis controller (Phoresor II, Iomed) was used to provide a direct current for drug iontophoresis. Acetylcholine (1%, Miochol, IOLAB, Bournonville Pharma) was delivered with an anodal current; 9 doses (0.1 mA for 20 seconds) were delivered, with a 60-second interval between each dose. A 60-second interval between each iontophoresis period was required to achieve the plateau of the response following each delivery of acetylcholine.17 Day-to-day reproducibility was 15.9%±8.4%, as determined in 5 subjects on 2 occasions. Sodium nitroprusside (0.01%, Nipride, Roche) was delivered with a cathodal current; 7 doses (0.2 mA for 20 seconds) were delivered, with a 180-second interval between each dose. A 180-second interval between each iontophoresis period was required to achieve the plateau of the response after each delivery of sodium nitroprusside.17 Day-to-day reproducibility was 13.9%±9.0%, as determined in 5 subjects on 2 occasions. The response to acetylcholine vehicle (mannitol 3% in water for injection) and sodium nitroprusside vehicle (water for injection) served as a control. The responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were expressed uncorrected for their respective vehicle responses but were corrected for the biological zeros.
Ambulatory monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was used to obtain 24-hour recordings of blood pressure and heart rate. The nondominant arm was used with an appropriately sized cuff. The monitors were programmed to take blood pressure and heart rate readings every 15 minutes from 7 AM to 10 PM and every 20 minutes from 10 PM to 7 AM. The subjects completed an activity diary. The readings were downloaded onto a computer spreadsheet and individually edited into daytime and nighttime periods from the subjects' diaries.
Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), as a measure of body fat distribution, were determined. WHR was calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD, unless stated otherwise. The
paired Student's t test was used to compare capillary
densities before and after arterial occlusion.
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare vasodilatory
responses before and after drug and vehicle administration.
Subsequently, data were examined by use of Pearson's correlation. A
stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to
analyze whether the observed associations between blood
pressure and insulin sensitivity remained when allowing for
microvascular function, WHR, and 24-hour heart rate. A 2-tailed
P value of <0.05 was considered significant. All
analyses were performed on a personal computer with the
statistical software package SPSS version 6.0. Data of all 18 subjects
were available for analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insulin Sensitivity
Normoglycemia (4.5±0.4 mmol/L) was maintained during the
insulin infusion. Attained serum-free insulin concentrations averaged
409±128 pmol/L. The rate of glucose uptake, expressed per kilogram of
body weight, was 8.2±4.1 mg · kg-1
· min-1.
Microvascular Function
After 4 minutes of arterial occlusion, capillary
density increased from 38.3±5.9 to 53.8±8.4
capillaries/mm2 (P<0.0001). Blood
flow increased significantly from 19.1 (median, range 9.1 to 59.6) to
133.3 (median, range 54.3 to 263.9) arbitrary perfusion units (PU)
after iontophoresis of acetylcholine (P<0.001). The mean
percentage of acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation was 683.4%±274%.
Acetylcholine-vehicle (mannitol 3%) elicited a small but significant
increase in blood flow from 14.7 (median, range 6.2 to 33.7) to 16.2
(median, range 9.4 to 44.6) PU (P<0.01); the percentage
increase was 12.7% (median, range 0% to 131.4%). After iontophoresis
of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), blood flow increased significantly from
19.8 (median, range 8.5 to 36.9) to 148.2 (median, range 56.2 to 211.6)
PU (P<0.001). The mean percentage SNP-mediated
vasodilatation was 768.8%±381%. SNP-vehicle (water for injection)
also elicited a small but significant increase in blood flow from 15.4
(median, range 7.2 to 30.6) to 17.7 PU (median, range 9.7 to 72.8;
P<0.01); the percentage increase was 26.6% (median, range
0% to 82.3%). Correction for vehicle response did not importantly
affect any of the subsequent analyses (data not shown).
Multiple Regression Analysis
Table 2
shows the correlations among
the main variables and demonstrates that insulin sensitivity, blood
pressure, and estimates of microvascular function were significantly
correlated. A reduction in microvascular vasodilator capacity was
associated with an increase in insulin resistance and 24-hour SBP
(Figure 1
).
|
|
A leading theory postulates that blood pressure elevation is caused by
insulin resistance and compensatory
hyperinsulinemia.1 We wished to
examine whether any such relation can instead be explained by
microvascular function. Table 3
shows
that statistically, this is indeed the case. Model 1 shows that insulin
sensitivity (independent variable), as expected, was
univariately related to blood pressure (dependent
variable). Model 2 shows that the relation between insulin
sensitivity and blood pressure was lost when microvascular function
(ie, percentage capillary recruitment and percentage
acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation) was entered into the regression
analysis. Next, we forced WHR into the analysis (model
3). The results were similar to those in model 2 in that insulin
sensitivity was not significantly related to blood pressure. The
relation between microvascular function and blood pressure was now
borderline significant, but in fact the regression coefficients (ß)
were very similar to those in model 2, so that WHR did not confound the
relation between microvascular dilator capacity and blood pressure.
Despite significant univariate associations with insulin
sensitivity (r=-0.56, P<0.05) and percentage
capillary recruitment (r=-0.49, P<0.05),
24-hour heart rate, a measure of sympathetic tone, did not confound the
relation between blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and microvascular
dilator capacity (model 4). To restrict the number of variables in
models 3 and 4, age, sex, and BMI were not entered. However,
univariate analyses showed that these variables
were not significantly associated with blood pressure, insulin
sensitivity, or microvascular function, and entering them in the
multivariate model did not affect the conclusions
(analysis not shown). In sum, the regression analyses
shown in Table 3
were consistent with the idea that the
association of insulin sensitivity with blood pressure can be explained
by altered microvascular function.
|
Our hypothesis in addition stipulated that microvascular function might
to some extent determine insulin sensitivity. Therefore, we next
examined whether microvascular function (independent variable) was
associated with insulin sensitivity (dependent variable). Table 4
shows that capillary recruitment was
significantly related to insulin sensitivity and that this was not
confounded by WHR.
|
Although the independent variables used in the regression models were highly interrelated, colinearity could not be detected (colinearity diagnostics, SPSS). Similar conclusions were reached when statistical analyses were performed with the use of absolute responses to acetylcholine and SNP instead of the percentage increase after iontophoresis. The same held true for the absolute versus the percentage increase of capillary density after arterial occlusion. Also, the use of the M-value instead of the M/I-value, as a measure of insulin sensitivity, did not lead to different conclusions (statistical analyses not shown). In the correlation analyses, SBP during the daytime showed the strongest association with insulin sensitivity and microvascular function, whereas blood pressure during the nighttime did not show any significant relation (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the basis of these findings, we suggest that perturbed microvascular
vasodilator capacity needs to be considered as an explanation for the
relation between insulin resistance and elevated blood pressure. Figure 2
shows how reduced microvascular
vasodilator capacity may link insulin resistance and elevated blood
pressure, both of which are associated with increased
cardiovascular risk. Recent experimental data support
the potential contribution of a reduction of microvascular vasodilator
capacity to an increase of tissue vascular resistance in
hypertension.5 6 Perturbed capillary recruitment may
decrease insulin sensitivity by several mechanisms: first, by
increasing diffusion distance of insulin and glucose to
glucose-metabolizing tissues10 11 ; second, by impairing
transendothelial insulin transport, a major determinant
of insulin action during hyperinsulinemic
clamps,19 if this should be surface-area dependent; third,
by impairing recruitment of previously underperfused muscle
tissue.20 In support, studies with the use of the perfused
rat hind limb have shown that skeletal muscle metabolism
(ie, oxygen uptake and insulin-mediated glucose uptake) can be
increased by increased capillary perfusion, even if total flow to the
muscle remains constant.21 22
|
Our findings give considerable support to the role of microvascular function in linking insulin resistance to elevated blood pressure. The data suggest that there is no direct, independent association between insulin sensitivity and blood pressure, and that this association could in large part be explained by microvascular vasodilator capacity, in particular percentage capillary recruitment. It is important to emphasize that these observations were not confounded by differences in sex or age and pertained in the absence of hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance. Consistent with our hypothesis is the recent finding of impaired microvascular vasodilatation and capillary rarefaction in young adult men with a familial predisposition to high blood pressure.23 In addition, it has previously been shown that normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents exhibit insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia compared with an appropriate control group.24
WHR, as a measure of body fat distribution, showed strong associations with insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and the measures of microvascular function. However, WHR did not confound the association between microvascular function and insulin sensitivity or blood pressure. Abdominal fat may secrete substances, such as free fatty acids and cytokines,25 which influence microvascular function. Free fatty acids have been shown to increase vasoconstrictor responses in dorsal hand veins26 and to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation at the level of the resistance vessels.27 In addition, proinflammatory cytokines have been proposed to link obesity to endothelial dysfunction.28 Alternatively, WHR may be a marker of a certain type of body composition that is itself linked to microvascular dysfunction. Associations between body fat distribution and muscle fiber type have been reported,10 29 30 with obesity and high WHR linked to fast-twitch predominance. WHR was even more closely related to muscle capillary density.10 Interestingly, in the same study insulin sensitivity showed a positive relation with capillary density and an inverse relation with the percentage of fast-twitch muscle fibers. In another small study, the percentage slow-twitch muscle fibers and capillary density have been found to correlate inversely with intra-arterial blood pressure and peripheral resistance in untreated hypertensive and normotensive subjects.3 Taken together, these studies are consistent with our findings and the contention that muscle fiber type and muscle capillary density play a role in linking insulin sensitivity with blood pressure. Muscle fiber composition and, thereby, capillary density, as well as insulin sensitivity may be negatively influenced by sustained sympathetic activation.31 Furthermore, increased sympathetic nervous activation, as indexed by elevated heart rate, has been proposed to link hypertension with insulin resistance.31 In our study, however, 24-hour heart rate did not confound the associations between blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and microvascular function. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that because of the cross-sectional nature of our study, we cannot exclude the possibility that the demonstrated associations can all be explained by an as yet unmeasured variable.
Because muscle is the main peripheral site of insulin action32 and of pressure dissipation, and therefore of vascular resistance, it might have been more straightforward to study muscle rather than skin microvascular function. However, the study of muscle capillary density, in contrast to skin capillary density, requires invasive techniques, and capillary recruitment cannot be studied. Furthermore, although skin is not a primary target organ of the insulin-mediated glucose uptake, the vascular effects of insulin can also be demonstrated at this site. Insulin has been demonstrated to induce vasodilatation in skin microcirculation independent of its hypoglycemic effect.33 Moreover, skin microvascular vasodilator capacity is associated with insulin sensitivity in subjects with fasting hyperglycemia.34 Likewise, although skin microvascular resistance does not make a major contribution to the total peripheral vascular resistance, an association between skin capillary density and blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects can nevertheless be demonstrated.4 35 Moreover, in subjects with hypertension, changes in skeletal muscle microvascular function are paralleled by changes in skin microvascular function.36 37 Therefore, skin microcirculation resembles muscle microcirculation in many ways, and the variation in skin microvascular function found in this study may merely be a manifestation of a generalized variation in microvascular function not confined to a single organ. Although direct comparisons between skin and muscle microvascular function have yet to be reported, it seems justified to use the skin microvascular model to assess the role of microvascular function in the relation between insulin sensitivity and blood pressure.
It may not be obvious that acetylcholine, applied topically through iontophoresis instead of intravasally, evokes an endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. In a recent study,38 however, the local vasodilatation caused by intradermally injected acetylcholine (into the extravascular space) was blocked by L-NMMA, a competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide synthesis. Also, this local vasodilatation is not dependent on prostaglandin production and functioning nociceptive C-fibers.38 39 Moreover, the vasodilator response to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine is reduced in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes17 and hypertension,40 and in these patients impaired endothelial vasomotor function has been demonstrated with other techniques.13 41 Therefore we and others39 find it possible that the effect of acetylcholine is chiefly endothelium dependent.
Our study subjects were recruited to show substantial variability in their insulin sensitivity, which resulted in an approximately 8-fold variation. Insulin sensitivity was expressed as M/I ratio, which is a measure of the quantity of glucose metabolized per plasma insulin concentration. By correcting for differences in steady-state plasma levels, the M/I value is a better index than the M value for comparing changes or differences in tissue sensitivity to insulin.42 The larger variation in insulin sensitivity and the use of the M/I value in the present study may explain the differences with a recent study of Petrie et al,43 who found basal endothelial nitric oxide synthesis, measured as the percent decrease in the forearm blood flow ratio during infusion of L-NMMA, to be inversely correlated with whole-body insulin sensitivity in normotensive, healthy men. No correlations, however, were observed between insulin sensitivity and acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation.43 Differences in subject selection may also explain the differences with the study of Utriainen et al,44 in which a dissociation between insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and endothelial dysfunction in normal subjects was demonstrated.
In summary, there is a continuous association between insulin sensitivity and blood pressure well within the physiological range. Microvascular function strongly relates to both, consistent with a possible central role in linking these variables. These findings may have important implications with respect to the high prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in insulin resistance states.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 1, 1998; revision received October 29, 1998; accepted November 5, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lind L, Berne C, Lithell H. Prevalence of insulin resistance in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13:14571462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Frisk-Holmberg M, Karlsson J, Tesch P. Central and peripheral circulation in relation to muscle fibre composition in normo- and hypertensive man. Clin Sci. 1979;56:335340.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Prasad A, Dunhill GS, Mortimer PS, MacGregor GA. Capillary rarefaction in the forearm skin in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13:265268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Greene AS, Tonellato PJ, Lui J, Lombard JH, Cowly AW.
Microvascular rarefaction and tissue vascular resistance in
hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H126H131.
6. Hudetz AG. Percolation phenomenon: the effect of capillary network rarefaction. Microvasc Res. 1993;45:110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. DeFronzo RA. Lilly Lecture: the triumvirate: ß-cell, muscle, liver: a collusion responsible for NIDDM. Diabetes. 1988;37:667687.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Pinkney JH, Stehouwer CDA, Coppack SW, Yudkin JS. Endothelial dysfunction: cause of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes. 1997;46(suppl 2):S9S13.
9. Wascher TC. Endothelial transport processes and tissue metabolism: evidence for microvascular endothelial dysfunction in insulin resistant diseases? Eur J Clin Invest. 1997;27:831835.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lillioja S, Young AA, Culter CL, Ivy JL, Abbott WGH, Zawasski JK, Yki-Järvinen H, Christin L, Secomb TW. Skeletal muscle capillary density and fiber type are possible determinants of in vivo insulin resistance in man. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:415424.
11. Baron AD. Cardiovascular actions of insulin in humans: implications for insulin sensitivity and vascular tone. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;7:961987.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction: implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:26012620.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE, Epstein SE. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:2227.[Abstract]
14. Ter Maaten JC, Voorburg A, Heine RJ, Ter Wee PM, Donker AJM, Gans ROB. Renal handling of urate and sodium during acute physiological hyperinsulinaemia in healthy subjects. Clin Sci. 1997;92:5181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bollinger A, Fagrell B, eds. Clinical Capillaroscopy: A Guide to Its Use in Clinical Research and Practice. Stuttgart, Germany: Hofgrefe & Huber Publishers; 1990.
16. Johnson PC, Burton KS, Henrich H, Henrich U. Effect of occlusion duration on reactive hyperemia in sartorius muscle capillaries. Am J Physiol. 1976;230:715719.
17. Morris SJ, Shore AC, Tooke JE. Responses of the skin microcirculation to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside in patients with NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1995;38:13371344.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Belcaro G, Hoffmann U, Bollinger A, Nicolaides A, eds. Laser Doppler. London, England: Med-Orion Publishing Company; 1994.
19. Steil GM, Ader M, Moore DM, Rebrin K, Bergman RN. Transendothelial insulin transport is not saturable in vivo: no evidence for a receptor-mediated process. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:14971503.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Bonadonna RC, Saccomani MP, Del Prato S, Bonora E,
DeFronzo RA, Cobelli C. Role of tissue-specific blood flow and tissue
recruitment in insulin-mediated glucose uptake of human skeletal
muscle. Circulation. 1998;98:234241.
21. Rattigan S, Clark MG, Barrett EJ. Hemodynamic actions of insulin in rat skeletal muscle: evidence for capillary recruitment. Diabetes. 1997;46:13811388.[Abstract]
22.
Clark MG, Colquhoun EQ, Rattigan S, Dora KA, Eldershaw
TP, Hall JL, Ye J. Vascular and endocrine control of muscle
metabolism (review). Am J Physiol. 1995;268:E797E812.
23. Noon JP, Walker BR, Webb DJ, Shore AC, Holton DW, Edwards HV, Watt GCM. Impaired microvascular dilatation and capillary rarefaction in young adults with a predisposition to high blood pressure. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:18731879.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Hulthén UL, Endre T, Mattiasson I, Berglund G.
Insulin and forearm vasodilatation in hypertension-prone men.
Hypertension. 1995;25:214218.
25.
Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL,
Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis
factor-
in human obesity and insulin resistance. J
Clin Invest. 1995;95:24092415.
26.
Stepniakowski KT, Goodfriend TL, Egan BM. Fatty acids
enhance vascular
-adrenergic sensitivity.
Hypertension. 1995;25:774778.
27. Steinberg HO, Tarshoby M, Monestel R, Hook G, Cronin J, Johnson A, Bayazeed B, Baron AD. Elevated circulating free fatty acid levels impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:12301239.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CDA, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW. Insulin resistance and endothelial damage: role of adipose tissue derived proinflammatory cytokines. Diabetologia. 1997;40(suppl 1):A305. Abstract.
29. Krotkiewski M, Björntorp P. Muscle tissue in obesity with different distribution of adipose tissue: effects of physical training. Int J Obesity. 1986;10:331341.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Wade AJ, Marbut MM, Round JM. Muscle fiber type and aetiology of obesity. Lancet. 1990;335:805808.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Julius S, Palatini P, Nesbitt SD. Tachycardia: an important determinant of coronary risk in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1998;16(suppl 1):S9S15.
32.
Baron AD, Brechtel G, Wallace P, Edelman SV. Rates and
tissue sites of non-insulin and insulin mediated glucose uptake in
humans. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:E769E774.
33. Tooke JE, Lins PE, Östergren J, Adamson U, Fagrell B. The effects of intravenous insulin infusion on skin microcirculatory flow in type 1 diabetes. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1985;4:6983.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Jaap AJ, Shore AC, Tooke JE. Relationship of insulin resistance to microvascular dysfunction in subjects with fasting hyperglycaemia. Diabetologia. 1997;40:238243.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Gasser P, Buhler FR. Nailfold microcirculation in normotensive and essential hypertensive subjects, as assessed by videomicroscopy. J Hypertens. 1992;10:8386.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Struijker Boudier HAJ, Crijns FR, Stolte J, Van Essen H. Assessment of the microcirculation in cardiovascular disease. Clin Sci. 1996;91:131139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Rendell MS, Milliken BK, Banset EJ, Finnegan M, Stanosheck C, Terando JV. The effect of chronic hypertension on skin blood flow. J Hypertens. 1996;14:609614.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Warren JB. Nitric oxide and human skin blood flow responses to acetylcholine and ultraviolet light. FASEB J. 1994;8:247251.[Abstract]
39.
Morris SJ, Shore AC. Skin blood flow responses to the
iontophoresis of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside in man:
possible mechanisms. J Physiol. 1996;496:531542.
40. Grossmann M, Jamieson MJ, Kellog DL Jr, Pergola PE, Sheperd AMM. Cutaneous vascular responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitrite in hypertension. Clin Res. 1993;41:759. Abstract.
41. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, McDermott BJ, McGrath LT, Henry WR, Andrews JW, Hayes JR. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatation in patients with type-2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1992;35:771776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Sherwin RS, Kramer KJ, Tobin JD, Insel PA, Liljenquist JE, Berman M, Andres R. A model of the kinetics of insulin in man. J Clin Invest. 1974;53:14811492.
43.
Petrie JR, Ueda S, Webb DJ, Elliott HL, Connell
JMC. Endothelial nitric oxide production and
insulin sensitivity: a physiological link with
implications for pathogenesis of cardiovascular
disease. Circulation. 1996;93:13311333.
44. Utriainen T, Mäkimattila S, Virkamäki A, Bergholm R, Yki-Järvinen H. Dissociation between insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and endothelial function in normal subjects. Diabetologia. 1996;39:14771482.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I C van Eijk, M J L Peters, E H Serne, I E van der Horst-Bruinsma, B A C Dijkmans, Y M Smulders, and M T Nurmohamed Microvascular function is impaired in ankylosing spondylitis and improves after tumour necrosis factor {alpha} blockade Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2009; 68(3): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G Ijzerman, C. D A Stehouwer, E. H Serne, J. J Voordouw, Y. M Smulders, H. A Delemarre-van de Waal, and M. M van Weissenbruch Incorporation of the fasting free fatty acid concentration into quantitative insulin sensitivity check index improves its association with insulin sensitivity in adults, but not in children Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 160(1): 59 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Pries, H. Habazettl, G. Ambrosio, P. R. Hansen, J. C. Kaski, V. Schachinger, H. Tillmanns, G. Vassalli, I. Tritto, M. Weis, et al. A review of methods for assessment of coronary microvascular disease in both clinical and experimental settings Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2008; 80(2): 165 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Clark Impaired microvascular perfusion: a consequence of vascular dysfunction and a potential cause of insulin resistance in muscle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2008; 295(4): E732 - E750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. G. Ketel, C. D. A. Stehouwer, E. H. Serne, T. J. M. Korsen, P. G. A. Hompes, Y. M. Smulders, R. T. de Jongh, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk Obese But Not Normal-Weight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Are Characterized by Metabolic and Microvascular Insulin Resistance J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3365 - 3372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Malik, V. Kondragunta, and I. J. Kullo Forearm Vascular Reactivity and Arterial Stiffness in Asymptomatic Adults From the Community Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1512 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Mourad, G. des Guetz, H. Debbabi, and B. I. Levy Blood pressure rise following angiogenesis inhibition by bevacizumab. A crucial role for microcirculation Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 927 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cheng, C. Daskalakis, and B. Falkner Original Research: Capillary rarefaction in treated and untreated hypertensive subjects Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Lesniewski, A. J. Donato, B. J. Behnke, C. R. Woodman, M. H. Laughlin, C. A. Ray, and M. D. Delp Decreased NO signaling leads to enhanced vasoconstrictor responsiveness in skeletal muscle arterioles of the ZDF rat prior to overt diabetes and hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1840 - H1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. de Boer, R. G. IJzerman, R. T. de Jongh, E. C. Eringa, C. D.A. Stehouwer, Y. M. Smulders, and E. H. Serne Birth Weight Relates to Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure in Healthy Adults Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 928 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Eringa, C. D. A. Stehouwer, M. H. Roos, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema Selective resistance to vasoactive effects of insulin in muscle resistance arteries of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1134 - E1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, B. Dahlof, and for the LIFE Study Investigators In-Treatment Resolution or Absence of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated With Decreased Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Hypertensive Patients: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, and E. Mannarino Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Reversal and Prevention of Diabetes: Two Birds With One Stone? Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 851 - 853. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Jonk, A. J. H. M. Houben, R. T. de Jongh, E. H. Serne, N. C. Schaper, and C. D. A. Stehouwer Microvascular Dysfunction in Obesity: A Potential Mechanism in the Pathogenesis of Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance and Hypertension Physiology, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 252 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Serne, R. T. de Jongh, E. C. Eringa, R. G. IJzerman, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Microvascular Dysfunction: A Potential Pathophysiological Role in the Metabolic Syndrome Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 204 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Eringa, C. D. A. Stehouwer, K. Walburg, A. D. Clark, G. P. van Nieuw Amerongen, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema Physiological Concentrations of Insulin Induce Endothelin-Dependent Vasoconstriction of Skeletal Muscle Resistance Arteries in the Presence of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Dependence on c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(2): 274 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, J. A. Vita, M. G. Larson, H. Parise, M. J. Keyes, E. Warner, R. S. Vasan, D. Levy, and E. J. Benjamin Cross-Sectional Relations of Peripheral Microvascular Function, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, and Aortic Stiffness: The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3722 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mather and S. Verma Function determines structure in the vasculature: lessons from insulin resistance Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): R305 - R306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gill, A. Al-Mamari, W. R. Ferrell, S. J. Cleland, C. J. Packard, N. Sattar, J. R. Petrie, and M. J. Caslake Effects of prior moderate exercise on postprandial metabolism and vascular function in lean and centrally obese men J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 21, 2004; 44(12): 2375 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Jadhav, J Petrie, W Ferrell, S Cobbe, and N Sattar Insulin resistance as a contributor to myocardial ischaemia independent of obstructive coronary atheroma: a role for insulin sensitisation? Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1379 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stewart, A. Kohen, D. Brouder, F. Rahim, S. Adler, R. Garrick, and M. S. Goligorsky Noninvasive interrogation of microvasculature for signs of endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic renal failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2687 - H2696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. de Jongh, E. H. Serne, R. G. IJzerman, G. de Vries, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Free Fatty Acid Levels Modulate Microvascular Function: Relevance for Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance, Hypertension, and Microangiopathy Diabetes, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 2873 - 2882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Eringa, C. D. A. Stehouwer, G. P. van Nieuw Amerongen, L. Ouwehand, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema Vasoconstrictor effects of insulin in skeletal muscle arterioles are mediated by ERK1/2 activation in endothelium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2043 - H2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. Wong, B. B. Duncan, S. H. Golden, R. Klein, D. J. Couper, B. E. K. Klein, L. D. Hubbard, A. R. Sharrett, and M. I. Schmidt Associations between the Metabolic Syndrome and Retinal Microvascular Signs: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 2949 - 2954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, H. Parise, J. A. Vita, M. G. Larson, E. Warner, J. F. Keaney Jr, M. J. Keyes, D. Levy, R. S. Vasan, and E. J. Benjamin Local Shear Stress and Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation: The Framingham Heart Study Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 134 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. de Jongh, E. H. Serne, R. G. IJzerman, G. de Vries, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Impaired Microvascular Function in Obesity: Implications for Obesity-Associated Microangiopathy, Hypertension, and Insulin Resistance Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2529 - 2535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Meigs, F. B. Hu, N. Rifai, and J. E. Manson Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus JAMA, April 28, 2004; 291(16): 1978 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. A. Stehouwer Endothelial dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy: state of the art and potential significance for non-diabetic renal disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 778 - 781. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Khan, F. C Green, J S. Forsyth, S. A Greene, A. D Morris, and J. J F Belch Impaired microvascular function in normal children: effects of adiposity and poor glucose handling J. Physiol., September 1, 2003; 551(2): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T F T Antonios, F M Rattray, D R J Singer, N D Markandu, P S Mortimer, and G A MacGregor Rarefaction of skin capillaries in normotensive offspring of individuals with essential hypertension Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 175 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Clark, M. G. Wallis, E. J. Barrett, M. A. Vincent, S. M. Richards, L. H. Clerk, and S. Rattigan Blood flow and muscle metabolism: a focus on insulin action Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2003; 284(2): E241 - E258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Eringa, C. D.A. Stehouwer, T. Merlijn, N. Westerhof, and P. Sipkema Physiological concentrations of insulin induce endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction during inhibition of NOS or PI3-kinase in skeletal muscle arterioles Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2002; 56(3): 464 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Serne, R. G Ijzerman, R. T de Jongh, and C. D.A Stehouwer Blood pressure and insulin resistance: role for microvascular function?: [Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:271-276] Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2002; 55(2): 418 - 419. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Serne, R. G. IJzerman, R. O.B. Gans, R. Nijveldt, G. de Vries, R. Evertz, A. J.M. Donker, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Direct Evidence for Insulin-Induced Capillary Recruitment in Skin of Healthy Subjects During Physiological Hyperinsulinemia Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1515 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.J Irving, B.R Walker, J.P Noon, G.C.M Watt, D.J Webb, and A.C Shore Microvascular correlates of blood pressure, plasma glucose, and insulin resistance in health Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 271 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Meigs, P. F. Jacques, J. Selhub, D. E. Singer, D. M. Nathan, N. Rifai, R. B. D'Agostino Sr., and P. W.F. Wilson Fasting Plasma Homocysteine Levels in the Insulin Resistance Syndrome: The Framingham Offspring Study Diabetes Care, August 1, 2001; 24(8): 1403 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Serne, R. O.B. Gans, J. C. ter Maaten, G.-J. Tangelder, A. J.M. Donker, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Impaired Skin Capillary Recruitment in Essential Hypertension Is Caused by Both Functional and Structural Capillary Rarefaction Hypertension, August 1, 2001; 38(2): 238 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.D. Hughes and S. Thom Wearing your heart in your sleeve? Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1071 - 1073. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Freeman, J. Norrie, N. Sattar, R. D. G. Neely, S. M. Cobbe, I. Ford, C. Isles, A. R. Lorimer, P. W. Macfarlane, J. H. McKillop, et al. Pravastatin and the Development of Diabetes Mellitus : Evidence for a Protective Treatment Effect in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Circulation, January 23, 2001; 103(3): 357 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Serne, R. O.B Gans, J. C ter Maaten, P. M ter Wee, A. J.M Donker, and C. D.A Stehouwer Capillary recruitment is impaired in essential hypertension and relates to insulin's metabolic and vascular actions Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2001; 49(1): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hammoud, J.-F. Tanguay, and M. G. Bourassa Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 355 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Mather, S. Verma, B. Corenblum, and T. J. Anderson Normal Endothelial Function Despite Insulin Resistance in Healthy Women with the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2000; 85(5): 1851 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ryan, D. McInerney, D. Owens, P. Collins, A. Johnson, and G.H. Tomkin Diabetes and the Mediterranean diet: a beneficial effect of oleic acid on insulin sensitivity, adipocyte glucose transport and endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity QJM, February 1, 2000; 93(2): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Cleland, J. R. Petrie, M. Small, H. L. Elliott, and J. M. C. Connell Insulin Action Is Associated With Endothelial Function in Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 507 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |