| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1999;99:1272-1276.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Chair of Internal Medicine University of Udine, Udine, Italy
To the Editor:
Several papers recently published in Circulation,1 2 3 and 1 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation,4 report that vitamin C is able to improve endothelial dysfunction. In each of these studies, the hypothesis is formulated that vitamin C may cause such an effect through its antioxidant activity, protecting NO from inactivation by superoxide anion.
Regarding all these studies, 3 questions should be taken into consideration:
1. The reported experiments do not constitute a strong support for the attribution of the effects of vitamin C to its antioxidant action. A demonstration that different antioxidants reproduce the same effect would have been useful.
2. Clinical trials based on the administration of vitamin C should be suggested with caution. Apart from the possibly increased risk of the formation of urinary oxalate stones during therapy with megadoses of ascorbic acid,5 vitamin C has been shown to increase the production of advanced glycation end products in diabetic patients.6 Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that vitamin C contributes only about 10% to the total antioxidant capacity of plasma.7 8
3. The bibliographies of all the above-mentioned studies do not adequately correspond with the existing literature. Indeed, my studies on the protective effects of several antioxidants, among with vitamin C, against endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients9 and the antihypertensive effects of the same substances10 were published in 1990 and 1991, respectively. If my publications had been cited, the authors would have reported much of their works as refined and more-detailed confirmations of previously known data. Moreover, they would have found extensive evidence to support the hypothesis that vitamin C exerts certain effects because it is an antioxidant, as illustrated in my review on the possible role of oxidative stress in hypertension, published in 1993.11 In fact, my studies showed that the same effect observed with vitamin C can be reproduced with 2 other antioxidants, thiopronine and glutathione, respectively.9 10
The question of missing citations is surely an important one, and particularly so when the paternity of a finding or concept of some value is to be attributed.
References
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass
We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to Dr Ceriello's comments concerning our recent publication in Circulation.1 In response to his comments, we offer the following points.
We agree that our study, as well as others, did not directly examine
the mechanism responsible for improved endothelial
vasomotor function with ascorbic acid in patients with or at risk for
vascular disease. However, we disagree with Dr Ceriello's
characterization that our study concluded "vitamin C may cause such
an effect through its antioxidant activity, protecting NO from
inactivation by superoxide anion." In our study, ascorbic acid
treatment produced a plasma concentration of 114±11 µmol/L.
Although ascorbic acid has the capacity to scavenge superoxide anion,
the rate constant for that reaction (3.3x105
mol · L-1 ·
s-1)2 is
105-fold less than the rate constant for the
reaction between superoxide anion and NO
(1.9x1010 mol ·
L-1 ·
s-1).3 On the basis of an estimated
local NO concentration of 0.1 to 1 µmol/L,4 one
would predict that an ascorbic acid concentration of 10 to 100 mmol/L
would be required to effectively compete for the reaction between NO
and superoxide anion. This prediction was recently confirmed in our
laboratory using an in vitro model of superoxide-mediated
endothelial dysfunction.4A As mentioned in
our initial article1 and in a more recent
study,5 an effect of ascorbic acid on cellular redox state
or glutathione metabolism should be considered. It remains
possible that an effect of ascorbic acid to scavenge superoxide anion
may contribute to the findings of other recent studies that used
intra-arterial infusions that produced ascorbic acid
concentrations in the 1 to 10 mmol/L range.6
We also disagree with Dr Ceriello's implication that his prior studies using ascorbic acid, glutathione, and an analogue of N-acetylcysteine (thiopronine) provide additional support that scavenging of superoxide accounts for the effect of ascorbic acid.7 8 Although glutathione is known to interact with superoxide, the rate of this reaction (102 to 103 mol · L-1 · s-1)9 dictates that glutathione competition with NO for superoxide would require extremely high glutathione concentrations (>100 mmol/L). A more plausible explanation for a concerted action of ascorbic acid, glutathione, and thiopronine would involve some effect on intracellular redox state, as suggested by our recent publication.5
Finally, Dr Ceriello was very concerned that we had not cited his papers published in the journals Diabetes and Metabolism (Paris) and Clinical Science in 1990 and 1991, respectively.7 8 Although we thank Dr Ceriello for bringing his work to our attention, we could not have cited those papers as previous demonstrations that ascorbic acid improves endothelial function because neither paper specifically examined endothelial function. The Clinical Science paper demonstrated that a rapid intravenous infusion of ascorbic acid (1 g) acutely lowers systemic blood pressure in patients with diabetes and/or hypertension.8 In the Diabetes and Metabolism paper, Dr Ceriello reported that the same dose of ascorbic acid increased the extent of postischemic reactive hyperemia in diabetic subjects.7 Subsequent studies have demonstrated that peak reactive hyperemia is largely an endothelium-independent response.10 Furthermore, the latter study was flawed because ascorbic acid and the other compounds used in the study induced large changes in baseline forearm blood flow (and presumably blood pressure), making it hard to interpret the findings. On the basis of those publications, Dr Ceriello claims "paternity" for the idea that "oxidative stress" plays a role in vascular dysfunction in atherosclerosis and related disease states. In response, we can only refer Dr Ceriello to earlier and concurrent work on this subject.11 12 13 14
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |