Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:II_537

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathiassen, O. N
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, K. L
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mathiassen, O. N
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, K. L

(Circulation. 2006;114:II_537.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Hypertension: Clinical: Genetics/Angiotensin/LVM/Vascular

Abstract 2595: Small Artery Structure is an Independent Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Essential Hypertension

Ole N Mathiassen1; Niels Henrik Buus2; Inger Sihm2; Niels Kristian Thybo2; Birgitte Moern2; Anne Pauline Schroeder3; Kristian Thygesen4; Christian Aalkjaer5; Ole Lederballe6; Michael J Mulvany7; Kent L Christensen7

1 Dep. of Pharmacology, Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
2 Dep. A of Medicine and Cardiology, Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
3 Dep. of Medicine, Hosp, Viborg, Denmark
4 Dep. A of Medicine and Cardiology, Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
5 Dep. of Physiology, Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
6 Dep. of Medicine, Hosp, Viborg, Denmark
7 Dep. of Pharmacology, Univ, Aarhus, Denmark

AIM: To investigate the prognostic significance for cardiovascular outcome of small artery structural changes in uncomplicated essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Small artery media-lumen ratio (M:L) is an important pathophysiological factor in essential hypertension. High M:L of small arteries isolated from subcutaneous gluteal skin biopsies has recently been shown to predict cardiovascular outcome in a heterogeneous high risk group of patients with type-2 diabetes, primary and secondary hypertension. However, since the abnormal M:L in diabetes is pressure-independent, the relevance of those findings to essential hypertension has been uncertain.

METHODS: We conducted a follow-up survey of a homogenous low-to-medium risk group of 159 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had been included in clinical treatment studies. Mean follow-up was 10.4 years. All patients had an initial assessment of M:L using myography before starting therapy.

RESULTS: Thirty patients suffered a documented predefined cardiovascular event during follow-up. Increased relative risk (RR) was associated with M:L ≥ 0.083 (mean level of the hypertensive cohort), RR = 2.34 (95% CI: 1.11– 4.95), and with M:L ≥ 0.098 (mean level of a normotensive control group ± 2 SD), RR= 2.49 (95% CI: 1.21–5.11). Both results remained significant (RR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.04 - 4.64, and RR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.06 - 4.56, respectively) when adjusted for Heart Score level (10-year mortality risk-estimate, integrating age, gender, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol and smoking).

CONCLUSION: Resistance artery M:L predicts cardiovascular events in essential hypertensive patients at low to moderate risk independently of the Heart Score risk estimate.





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathiassen, O. N
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, K. L
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mathiassen, O. N
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, K. L