Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:II_588

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulukutla, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mulukutla, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, S.

(Circulation. 2006;114:II_588.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Featured Research: Catheter-Based Coronary Interventions: Diabetes

Abstract 2809: Insulin-Treated Diabetic Patients Have Attenuated Benefit of Drug-Eluting Stents After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry

Suresh Mulukutla1; Oscar C Marroquin1; Elizabeth M Holper2; Helen Vlachos3; Faith Selzer4; J. D Abbott5; Warren Laskey6; Vankeepuram Srinivas7; Jack D7; Kevin E Kip8; Sheryl Kelsey8

1 Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
2 Univ of Chicago, Chicago, IL
3 Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
4 Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
5 Rhode Island Hosp, Providence, RI
6 Univ of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
7 Weiler Hosp/Montefiore Med Cntr, New York City/Bronx, NY
8 Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Background: Insulin-treated diabetic patients have elevated adverse event raets after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis in diabetic patients compared to bare-metal stents (BMS); however, we hypothesized that insulin-treated patients would not have a similar magnitude of benefit from DES as non-insulin treated diabetic patients.

Methods: We analyzed baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of 1914 diabetic patients in the NHLBI Dynamic Registry of PCI. Subjects were stratified according to diabetic therapy (insulin-treated vs non-insulin-treated) and stent type (DES vs BMS).

Results: Insulin-treated subjects were older, more likely female, and had more comorbid conditions. Angiographic success and number of lesions treated did not vary significantly. Adjusted 1-year outcome analysis in stented patients demonstrated that non-insulin-treated patients who received a DES had significantly less repeat revascularization [HR 0.42 (0.28 – 0.62, 95% CI), p=0.001]; however, the benefit of DES among insulin-treated subjects was lower (Figure) revealing a non-significant trend towards less repeat revascularization [HR 0.67 (0.42–1.06, 95% CI), p<0.12].

Conclusions: Among diabetic patients, those treated with insulin had similar angiographic success but worse 1-year outcomes than those not on insulin therapy. While there is a trend towards benefit of DES in the insulin-treated group, the benefit appears to be attenuated compared with non-insulin treated subjects. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to investigate possible mechanisms.


Figure 1
Figure: One year repeat revascularization(PCI/CABG) rate





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulukutla, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mulukutla, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, S.