| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on February 25, 2002
From the Cardiovascular Imaging Center, the Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sk{at}virginia.edu.
BackgroundWe hypothesized that increased myocardial oxygen demand resulting from hypotension and reflex tachycardia unmasking a reduced endocardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve is the mechanism of dipyridamole-induced regional dysfunction in chronic coronary artery disease. Methods and ResultsAmeroid constrictors were placed around the proximal coronary arteries and their major branches in 15 dogs to create chronic coronary stenosis. Seven days later, radiolabeled microsphere--derived MBF and 2-dimensional echocardiography--derived percent wall thickening (%WT) were measured at rest and after 0.56 mg/kg dipyridamole. Dipyridamole caused an increase (mean, 21%) in the rate-pressure product secondary to reflex tachycardia resulting from mild systemic hypotension. %WT in myocardial segments with an endocardial MBF reserve (dipyridamole/resting MBF) of 1.5 to 2.5 (n=35) did not change after dipyridamole, whereas it decreased in segments with an endocardial MBF reserve of <1.5 (n=30) and increased in those with an endocardial MBF reserve of ConclusionsIncreased myocardial oxygen demand resulting from hypotension and reflex tachycardia unmasking a reduced endocardial MBF reserve is the primary mechanism of dipyridamole-induced regional dysfunction in chronic coronary artery disease.
Revised on April 18, 2002
Accepted on April 18, 2002
Mechanism of Inducible Regional Dysfunction During Dipyridamole Stress
Jian-Ping Bin MD,
2.5 (n=45) (P<0.05). Most (80%) segments with endocardial MBF reserve of <1.5 and 14% with an endocardial MBF reserve of 1.5 to 2.5 showed inducible dysfunction after dipyridamole, whereas none of the segments with an endocardial MBF reserve of
2.5 showed this finding. A sigmoid relation (y=-6.74/[1+exp (19.9 · [x-1.84])]+1.35 · x, r=0.93, P<0.0001) was noted between endocardial MBF reserve and
%WT. In contrast, neither the epicardial MBF reserve nor the endocardial/epicardial MBF ratio during hyperemia was associated with inducible regional dysfunction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kaul Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A 25-Year Retrospective Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 291 - 308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. George, C. Silva, M. A.S. Cordeiro, A. DiPaula, D. R. Thompson, W. F. McCarthy, T. Ichihara, J. A.C. Lima, and A. C. Lardo Multidetector Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging During Adenosine Stress J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 153 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Rimoldi, K. P. Schafers, R. Boellaard, F. Turkheimer, L. Stegger, M. P. Law, A. A. Lammerstma, and P. G. Camici Quantification of Subendocardial and Subepicardial Blood Flow Using 15O-Labeled Water and PET: Experimental Validation J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Moir, B. A. Haluska, C. Jenkins, R. Fathi, and T. H. Marwick Incremental Benefit of Myocardial Contrast to Combined Dipyridamole-Exercise Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1108 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, A. Wahl, R. Gebker, M. Neuss, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Comparison of Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance, Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance, and Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Circulation, August 17, 2004; 110(7): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. L. Lima, D. D. Watson, A. R. Goode, M. S. Siadaty, M. Ragosta, G. A. Beller, and H. Samady Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 64 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |