Published Online
on March 1, 2004

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 16, 2004

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 109/10/1226    most recent 01.CIR.0000121423.78120.49v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nanthakumar, K. Articles by Kay, G. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nanthakumar, K. Articles by Kay, G. N. Related Collections Ablation/ICD/surgery Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

Submitted on December 10, 2003
Revised on January 20, 2004
Accepted on January 27, 2004

Resumption of Electrical Conduction in Previously Isolated Pulmonary Veins. Rationale for a Different Strategy?

Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar MD^*, Vance J. Plumb MD, Andrew E. Epstein MD, George D. Veenhuyzen MD, Dale Link RN, and G. Neal Kay MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kn{at}crml.uab.edu.

Background--Atrial fibrillation (AF) may recur after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the result of either recurrent PV conduction or non-PV foci. This study characterized the electrophysiological findings of patients with recurrent AF after initially successful PVI and the clinical outcome after a repeat procedure.

Methods and Results--Among 185 patients undergoing PVI, 52 reported no significant improvement in their clinical course. We analyzed PV conduction in 51 PVs (15 patients) at repeat PVI. All PVs were isolated with either RF (30 W, 50°C, 60 seconds) or cryoablation (-80°C for 5 minutes). At repeat study, 42 of the previously isolated 51 PVs had return of conduction. All patients had recurrent conduction in 2 PVs, with only 1 non-PV focus identified. The mean number of RF applications required to re-isolate the PVs was fewer at the repeat compared with the initial procedure (10±6 versus 4±2, P<0.005). Over a period of 15±6 months, all but 1 patient was clinically improved by the second procedure.

Conclusions--In patients with recurrent AF after PVI, return of PV conduction can be expected. Repeat PVI provides significant clinical benefit for these patients. These results suggest that if permanent PV isolation is the ablation strategy, different techniques may be required to improve long-term efficacy.

Key words: mapping • catheter ablation • arrhythmia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Satomi, R. Tilz, S. Takatsuki, J. Chun, B. Schmidt, D. Bansch, M. Antz, T. Zerm, A. Metzner, B. Kokturk, et al. Inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: clinical predictor and outcome during follow-up Europace, May 19, 2008; (2008) eun131v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Katritsis, M. A. Wood, E. Giazitzoglou, R. K. Shepard, G. Kourlaba, and K. A. Ellenbogen Long-term follow-up after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Pratola, E. Baldo, P. Notarstefano, T. Toselli, and R. Ferrari Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Is the Persistence of All Intraprocedural Targets Necessary for Long-Term Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm? Circulation, January 15, 2008; 117(2): 136 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Ulphani, R. Arora, J. H. Cain, R. Villuendas, S. Shen, D. Gordon, F. Inderyas, L. A. Harvey, A. Morris, J. J. Goldberger, et al. The ligament of Marshall as a parasympathetic conduit Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1629 - H1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Lindsay Is Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation a Critical Determinant of Recurrent Arrhythmias After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 875 - 876. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Peters, J. V. Wylie, T. H. Hauser, K. V. Kissinger, R. M. Botnar, V. Essebag, M. E. Josephson, and W. J. Manning Detection of Pulmonary Vein and Left Atrial Scar after Catheter Ablation with Three-dimensional Navigator-gated Delayed Enhancement MR Imaging: Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2007; 243(3): 690 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Yamada, Y. Murakami, T. Okada, M. Okamoto, T. Shimizu, J. Toyama, Y. Yoshida, N. Tsuboi, T. Ito, M. Muto, et al. Incidence, location, and cause of recovery of electrical connections between the pulmonary veins and the left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Essebag, F. Baldessin, M. R. Reynolds, S. McClennen, J. Shah, K. F. Kwaku, P. Zimetbaum, and M. E. Josephson Non-inducibility post-pulmonary vein isolation achieving exit block predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2005; 26(23): 2550 - 2555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Verma, F. Kilicaslan, E. Pisano, N. F. Marrouche, R. Fanelli, J. Brachmann, J. Geunther, D. Potenza, D. O. Martin, J. Cummings, et al. Response of Atrial Fibrillation to Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation Is Directly Related to Resumption and Delay of Pulmonary Vein Conduction Circulation, August 2, 2005; 112(5): 627 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Scherlag, W. Yamanashi, U. Patel, R. Lazzara, and W. M. Jackman Autonomically Induced Conversion of Pulmonary Vein Focal Firing Into Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1878 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hocini, P. Sanders, P. Jais, L.-F. Hsu, R. Weerasoriya, C. Scavee, Y. Takahashi, M. Rotter, F. Raybaud, L. Macle, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary vein disconnection after anatomical ablation for atrial fibrillation: consequences of wide atrial encircling of the pulmonary veins Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 696 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ouyang, M. Antz, S. Ernst, H. Hachiya, H. Mavrakis, F. T. Deger, A. Schaumann, J. Chun, P. Falk, D. Hennig, et al. Recovered Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Dominant Factor for Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Complete Circular Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins: Lessons From Double Lasso Technique Circulation, January 18, 2005; 111(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]