Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:2172-2177

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J. W., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes

(Circulation. 2000;101:2172.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Randomized Trial of Contrast Media Utilization in High-Risk PTCA

The COURT Trial

Charles J. Davidson, MD; Warren K. Laskey, MD; James B. Hermiller, MD; J. Kevin Harrison, MD; William Matthai, Jr, MD; Ronald E. Vlietstra, MD; Jeffrey A. Brinker, MD; Dean J. Kereiakes, MD; Joseph B. Muhlestein, MD; Alexandra Lansky, MD; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD; Maurice Buchbinder, MD; John W. Hirshfeld, Jr, MD

From Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Ill (C.J.D.); University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore (W.K.L.); The Care Group, Indianapolis, Ind (J.B.H.); Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.K.H.); Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (W.M.); Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Lakeland, Fla (R.E.V.); Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md (J.A.B.); Christ Hospital/Lindner Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (D.J.K.); Latter Day Saints Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.B.M.); Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.L., J.J.P.); Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, Calif (M.B.); and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (J.W.H.).

Correspondence to Charles J. Davidson, MD, Northwestern University Medical School, Feinberg Pavilion, Suite 8-526, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail cdavidso{at}nmh.org

Background—Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested an association between thrombus-related events and type of contrast media. Low osmolar contrast agents appear to improve the safety of diagnostic and coronary artery interventional procedures. However, no data are available on PTCA outcomes with an isosmolar contrast agent.

Methods and Results—A multicenter prospective randomized double-blind trial was performed in 856 high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery intervention. The objective was to compare the isosmolar nonionic dimer iodixanol (n=405) with the low osmolar ionic agent ioxaglate (n=410). A composite variable of in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACE) was the primary end point. A secondary objective was to evaluate major angiographic and procedural events during and after PTCA. The composite in-hospital primary end point was less frequent in those receiving iodixanol compared with those receiving ioxaglate (5.4% versus 9.5%, respectively; P=0.027). Core laboratory defined angiographic success was more frequent in patients receiving iodixanol (92.2% versus 85.9% for ioxaglate, P=0.004). There was a trend toward lower total clinical events at 30 days in patients randomized to iodixanol (9.1% versus 13.2% for ioxaglate, P=0.07). Multivariate predictors of in-hospital MACE were use of ioxaglate (P=0.01) and treatment of a de novo lesion (P=0.03).

Conclusions—In this contemporary prospective multicenter trial of PTCA in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, there was a low incidence of in-hospital clinical events for both treatment groups. The cohort receiving the nonionic dimer iodixanol experienced a 45% reduction in in-hospital MACE when compared with the cohort receiving ioxaglate.


Key Words: contrast media • angioplasty • myocardial infarction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, J. G. Ravenel, P. K. Randall, P. B. Romano, K. A. Strom, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Iso-Osmolality versus Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Medium at Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT: Effect on Kidney Function
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 97 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S.-H. Jo, T.-J. Youn, B.-K. Koo, J.-S. Park, H.-J. Kang, Y.-S. Cho, W.-Y. Chung, G.-W. Joo, I.-H. Chae, D.-J. Choi, et al.
Renal Toxicity Evaluation and Comparison Between Visipaque (Iodixanol) and Hexabrix (Ioxaglate) in Patients With Renal Insufficiency Undergoing Coronary Angiography: The RECOVER Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 924 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Additional Information
JAMA, March 15, 2006; 295(11): E7 - E14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. J. Barrett and P. S. Parfrey
Preventing Nephropathy Induced by Contrast Medium
N. Engl. J. Med., January 26, 2006; 354(4): 379 - 386.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. K. Fishman
Multidetector-row computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease: the importance of heart rate
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2005; 7(suppl_G): G4 - G12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J. A. Brinker, C. J. Davidson, and W. Laskey
Preventing in-hospital cardiac and renal complications in high-risk PCI patients
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2005; 7(suppl_G): G13 - G24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Bettmann
Frequently Asked Questions: Iodinated Contrast Agents
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S3 - S10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Aspelin, P. Aubry, S.-G. Fransson, R. Strasser, R. Willenbrock, K. J. Berg, and the NEPHRIC Study Investigators
Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography
N. Engl. J. Med., February 6, 2003; 348(6): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Bertrand
Contrast media--a contradiction?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2002; 23(2): 172 - 173.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. J. Davidson and W. K. Laskey
Contrast media--why the confusion?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2002; 23(2): 175 - 176.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.B. Batchelor
From COURT to HOMBURG: in search of the optimal contrast agent
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2026 - 2028.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Scheller
A reply
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2028 - 2029.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Schrader
Ionic or non-ionic contrast media in stent placement
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2029 - 2029.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Scheller
A reply
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2029 - 2031.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Legrand
Ionic or non-ionic contrast during coronary intervention: does it make a difference?
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 353 - 354.
[PDF]