This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hsia, T.-Y. Articles by de Leval, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hsia, T.-Y. Articles by de Leval, M. R. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Congenital Heart Defects Related Collections Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery Other Research

(Circulation. 2000;102:III-148.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

Effects of Respiration and Gravity on Infradiaphragmatic Venous Flow in Normal and Fontan Patients

Tain-Yen Hsia, MD; Sachin Khambadkone, MD, MRCP; Andrew N. Redington, FRCP; Francesco Migliavacca, PhD; John E. Deanfield, FRCP; Marc R. de Leval, MD, FRCS

From Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.

Correspondence to Marc R. de Leval, Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK. E-mail hsia{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu

Background—In the Fontan circulation, pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances are in series. The implications of this unique arrangement on infradiaphragmatic venous physiology are poorly understood.

Methods and Results—We studied the effects of respiration and gravity on infradiaphragmatic venous flows in 20 normal healthy volunteers (control) and 48 Fontan patients (atriopulmonary connection [APC] n=15, total cavopulmonary connection [TCPC] n=30). Hepatic venous (HV), subhepatic inferior vena caval (IVC), and portal venous (PV) flow rates were measured with Doppler ultrasonography during inspiration and expiration in both the supine and upright positions. The inspiratory-to-expiratory flow rate ratio was calculated to reflect the effect of respiration, and the supine-to-upright flow rate ratio was calculated to assess the effect of gravity. HV flow depended heavily on inspiration in TCPC compared with both control and APC subjects (inspiratory-to-expiratory flow rate ratio 3.4, 1.7, and 1.6, respectively; P<0.0001). Normal PV flow was higher in expiration, but this effect was lost in TCPC and APC patients (inspiratory-to-expiratory flow rate ratio 0.8, 1.0, and 1.1, respectively; P=0.01). The respiratory influence on IVC flow was the same in all groups. Gravity decreased HV flow more in APC than in TCPC patients (supine-to-upright flow rate ratio 3.2 versus 2.1, respectively; P<0.04) but reduced PV flow equally in all groups.

Conclusions—Gravity and respiration have important influences on infradiaphragmatic venous return in Fontan patients. Although gravity exerts a significant detrimental effect on lower body venous return, which is more marked in APC than in TCPC patients, the beneficial effects of respiration in TCPC patients are mediated primarily by an increase in HV flow. These effects may have important short- and long-term implications for the hemodynamics of the Fontan circulation.

Key Words: Fontan procedure • veins • hemodynamics • respiration • physiology