This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anselme, F. Articles by Saoudi, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anselme, F. Articles by Saoudi, N. Related Collections Ablation/ICD/surgery Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2001;103:1434.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter

A Randomized Comparison of 2 Methods for Determining Complete Bidirectional Isthmus Block

Frédéric Anselme, MD; Arnaud Savouré, MD; Alain Cribier, MD; Nadir Saoudi, MD

From Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.

Correspondence to Frédéric Anselme, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France. E-mail frederic.anselme{at}chu-rouen.fr

Background—Complete bidirectional isthmus conduction block (CBIB) was initially assessed by sequential detailed activation mapping at both sides of the ablation line during proximal coronary sinus and anteroinferior right atrium pacing. Mapping only the ablation line ("on-site" atrial potential analysis) was recently reported as a means of CBIB identification. The study was designed to compare these 2 techniques prospectively regarding the diagnosis of CBIB.

Methods and Results—In 76 consecutive patients (mean age, 63.4±10.5 years), typical atrial flutter ablation was performed using either the activation mapping technique (group I) or on-site atrial potential analysis (group II). Criteria for CBIB using on-site atrial potential analysis was the recording of parallel, widely spaced double atrial potentials along the ablation line. The CBIB criterion was retrospectively searched using the alternative technique at the end of the procedure. In successful patients, the mean radiofrequency delivery duration was longer in group II (845±776 versus 534±363 s; P=0.03). On-site, clear-cut, widely spaced double atrial potentials and activation mapping suggesting CBIB were concomitantly observed in only 47 patients (54%), and ambiguous/atypical double potentials were recorded in 31 patients (39%).

Conclusions—Although feasible, the on-site atrial potential analysis seemed to be inferior to the classic activation mapping technique, mainly because of the ambiguity of electrogram interpretation along the ablation line. However, when combined with the activation mapping technique, it provided additional information regarding isthmus conduction properties in some cases. Therefore, optimally, both methods should be used concomitantly.

Key Words: atrial flutter • catheter ablation • conduction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Da Costa Catheter ablation procedures: role of nation-wide registries Europace, February 1, 2009; 11(2): 133 - 134. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Da Costa, J. Thevenin, F. Roche, C. Romeyer-Bouchard, L. Abdellaoui, M. Messier, L. Denis, E. Faure, R. Gonthier, G. Kruszynski, et al. Results From the Loire-Ardeche-Drome-Isere-Puy-de-Dome (LADIP) Trial on Atrial Flutter, a Multicentric Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Amiodarone and Radiofrequency Ablation After the First Episode of Symptomatic Atrial Flutter Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1676 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Da Costa, C. Romeyer-Bouchard, V. Dauphinot, D. Lipp, L. Abdellaoui, M. Messier, J. Thevenin, J.-C. Barthelemy, and K. Isaaz Cavotricuspid isthmus angiography predicts atrial flutter ablation efficacy in 281 patients randomized between 8 mm- and externally irrigated-tip catheter Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1833 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Additional Information JAMA, March 15, 2006; 295(11): E7 - E14. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Da Costa, E. Faure, J. Thevenin, M. Messier, S. Bernard, K. Abdel, C. Robin, C. Romeyer, and K. Isaaz Effect of Isthmus Anatomy and Ablation Catheter on Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Cavotricuspid Isthmus Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1030 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-J. Lin, C.-T. Tai, J.-L. Huang, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, C.-T. Ting, and S.-A. Chen Characteristics of virtual unipolar electrograms for detecting isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2004; 43(12): 2300 - 2304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Bertaglia, F Zoppo, A Bonso, A Proclemer, R Verlato, L Coro, R Mantovan, D D'Este, F Zerbo, and P Pascotto Long term follow up of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: clinical course and predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 59 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Andronache, C. de Chillou, H. Miljoen, I. Magnin-Poull, M. Messier, P. Dotto, D. Beurrier, T. Doan, P. Houriez, A. Bineau-Jorisse, et al. Correlation between electrogram morphology and standard criteria to validate bidirectional cavotricuspid block in common atrial flutter ablation Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(4): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]