Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;105:2986-2991
Published online before print June 17, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000019743.11941.3B
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/25/2986    most recent
01.CIR.0000019743.11941.3Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nobuyoshi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nobuyoshi, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 2002;105:2986.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Stent Placement in Native Coronary Arteries

Takeshi Kimura, MD; Kenichi Abe, MD; Satoshi Shizuta, MD; Keita Odashiro, MD; Yoshinori Yoshida, MD; Koyu Sakai, MD; Kazuaki Kaitani, MD; Katsumi Inoue, MD; Yoshihisa Nakagawa, MD; Hiroyoshi Yokoi, MD; Masashi Iwabuchi, MD; Naoya Hamasaki, MD; Hideyuki Nosaka, MD; Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Correspondence to Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, MD, Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Kifune-machi, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu, 802, Japan. E-mail kmhptca{at}nn.iij4u.or.jp

Background Although coronary stents have been proved effective in reducing clinical cardiac events for up to 3 to 5 years, longer term clinical and angiographic outcomes have not yet been fully clarified.

Methods and Results To evaluate longer term (7 to 11 years) outcome, clinical and angiographic follow-up information was analyzed in 405 patients with successful stenting in native coronary arteries. Primary or secondary stabilization, which was defined as freedom from death, coronary artery bypass grafting, and target lesion-percutaneous coronary intervention (TL-PCI) during the 14 months after the initial procedure or after the last TL-PCI, was achieved in 373 patients (92%) overall. Only 7 patients (1.7%) underwent TL-PCI more than twice. After the initial 14-month period, freedom from TL-PCI reached a plateau at 84.9% to 80.7% over 1 to 8 years. However, quantitative angiographic analysis in 179 lesions revealed a triphasic luminal response characterized by an early restenosis phase until 6 months, an intermediate-term regression phase from 6 months to 3 years, and a late renarrowing phase beyond 4 years. Minimal luminal diameter in 131 patients with complete serial data were 2.62±0.4 mm immediately after stenting, 2.0±0.49 mm at 6 months, 2.19±0.49 mm at 3 years, and 1.85±0.56 mm beyond 4 years (P<0.0001).

Conclusions The efficacy and safety of coronary stenting seemed to be clinically sustained at 7 to 11 years of follow-up. However, late luminal renarrowing beyond 4 years was common, which demonstrates the need for further follow-up.


Key Words: stents • restenosis • angioplasty




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Daemen and P. W. Serruys
Drug-Eluting Stent Update 2007: Part II: Unsettled Issues
Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 961 - 968.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
S. S. Pedersen, E. J. Martens, J. Denollet, and A. Appels
Poor Health-Related Quality of Life Is a Predictor of Early, But Not Late, Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Psychosomatics, August 1, 2007; 48(4): 331 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. J. Gomes and E. Buffolo
Coronary stenting and inflammation: implications for further surgical and medical treatment.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1918 - 1925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K D Dawkins, T Gershlick, M de Belder, A Chauhan, G Venn, P Schofield, D Smith, J Watkins, H H Gray, and Joint Working Group on Percutaneous Coronary Inter
Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training
Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(suppl_6): vi1 - vi27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G Sianos, A Hoye, F Saia, W van der Giessen, P Lemos, P J de Feyter, P C Levendag, R van Domburg, and P W Serruys
Long term outcome after intracoronary {beta} radiation therapy
Heart, July 1, 2005; 91(7): 942 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. E. Sousa, M. A. Costa, A. Abizaid, F. Feres, A. C. Seixas, L. F. Tanajura, L. A. Mattos, R. Falotico, J. Jaeger, J. J. Popma, et al.
Four-Year Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
Circulation, May 10, 2005; 111(18): 2326 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P.-E. Falcoz, S. Chocron, C. Binquet, L. Stoica, D. Kaili, C. Quantin, and J.-P. Etievent
Revascularization of the Right Coronary Artery: Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1232 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
H C Lowe, B James, and L M Khachigian
A novel model of in-stent restenosis: rat aortic stenting
Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 393 - 395.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
A. Appels, F. Bar, G. van der Pol, R. Erdman, M. Assman, W. Trijsburg, R. van Diest, J. van Dixhoorn, and C. M. de Leon
Effects of Treating Exhaustion in Angioplasty Patients on New Coronary Events: Results of the Randomized Exhaustion Intervention Trial (EXIT)
Psychosom Med, March 1, 2005; 67(2): 217 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. K. Laskey
Late Follow-Up From RAVEL: Transition From Intention to Observation
Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 958 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
Y Takeda, T Kobayashi, N Awata, S Sato, J H C Reiber, T Nakagawa, E Tsuchikane, O Katoh, M Kirino, T Kobayashi, et al.
Serial six year quantitative angiographic follow up in asymptomatic patients following successful coronary angioplasty
Heart, October 1, 2004; 90(10): 1179 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. E. Cutlip, A. G. Chhabra, D. S. Baim, M. S. Chauhan, S. Marulkar, J. Massaro, A. Bakhai, D. J. Cohen, R. E. Kuntz, and K. K.L. Ho
Beyond Restenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes From Second-Generation Coronary Stent Trials
Circulation, September 7, 2004; 110(10): 1226 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. G. Raja, F. Eefting, H. Nathoe, P. Stella, C. Borst, S. Ernst, P. de Jaegere, D. van Dijk, J. Diephuis, E. Jansen, et al.
Stents May Be Better After One Year, But One Year Is Not Lifelong * Response
Circulation, June 8, 2004; 109(22): e312 - e313.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S.-J. Park, W. H. Shim, D. S. Ho, A. E. Raizner, S.-W. Park, M.-K. Hong, C. W. Lee, D. Choi, Y. Jang, R. Lam, et al.
A Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2003; 348(16): 1537 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Long-Term Follow-Up After Coronary Stenting
Journal Watch Cardiology, August 30, 2002; 2002(830): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]