Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:e167-e170
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000123021.19837.40
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gould, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biochemistry and metabolism
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Energy metabolism
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2004;109:e167-e170.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Myocardial Ischemia, Fluorodeoxyglucose, and Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: The Complexities of Metabolic Remodeling in Hibernating Myocardium

K. Lance Gould, MD

The Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex, gould@pet.med.uth.tmc.edu

Heinrich Taegtmeyer, MD, PhD

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

Myocardial imaging of perfusion (with either 13N-ammonia or 82Rb) and of metabolism with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a validated method for differentiating viable myocardium from necrosis or scar.1,2 Early in its clinical application, FDG was injected during exercise stress to intensify the difference between normal and ischemic myocardium. This approach was based on the following general principles of myocardial metabolism. (1) Normally perfused, nonischemic myocardium metabolizes primarily fatty acids. (2) Underperfused, ischemic myocardium metabolizes glucose. (3) Fasting suppresses glucose metabolism in normally perfused myocardium (but has no effect on anaerobic glucose metabolism in ischemic myocardium). (4) Catecholamines released during exercise stress further suppress exogenous glucose metabolism in normal myocardium but do not alter anaerobic glucose metabolism in ischemic myocardium.3–5 In principle, "hot-spot" imaging of myocardial ischemia would therefore identify "significant stenosis" of a coronary artery independently and separately from myocardial perfusion or anatomic stenosis severity.

However, those of us who enthusiastically supported FDG imaging quickly abandoned this approach 17 years ago. Hot-spot imaging during exercise was deemed not reliable because heart metabolism was, in fact, more complex than the generalized concepts outlined above. The switching of metabolic substrates in the heart is a complex process and cannot be reliably assessed by FDG under fasting and exercise conditions. Consequently, FDG uptake in the heart under these conditions does not reliably differentiate between ischemic and nonischemic myocardium.

Although FDG imaging did not prove diagnostically useful under exercise conditions, at rest it was able to differentiate between ischemic, viable myocardium and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Zuo-Xiang He, MD; Rong-Fang Shi, MD; Yong-Jian Wu, MD; Yue-Qin Tian, MD; Xiu-Jie Liu, MD; Xue-Wen Qin, MD; Run-Lin Gao, MD

Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Shi-Wen Wang, MD; Rui Shen, MD

Institute of Geriatric Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China

Jagat Narula, MD; Diwakar Jain, MD, FRCP

Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, Diwakar.Jain@drexel.edu