This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaul, S. Articles by Ito, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kaul, S. Articles by Ito, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Acute coronary syndromes Echocardiography Acute myocardial infarction Chronic ischemic heart disease Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2004;109:310-315.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Review: Clinical Cardiology: New Frontiers

Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II

Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Sanjiv Kaul, MD; Hiroshi Ito, MD

From the Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (S.K.), and the Cardiology Division, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan (H.I.).

Correspondence to Sanjiv Kaul, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Box 800158, Medical Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0158. E-mail sk@virginia.edu

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

	Introduction

 
In the setting of suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a cardiologist needs to know three things: (1) whether there is actually an ongoing infarction, (2) whether reperfusion therapy has succeeded, and (3) how much myocardium was salvaged by reperfusion. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can answer the first question by demonstrating the presence of a perfusion defect resulting from reduced microvascular flow because of the presence of a thrombus in an epicardial coronary artery. In a recent multicenter study of 203 patients without ST-segment elevation who presented to the emergency department with chest pain, 21 had AMI, and MCE only missed 1 such patient (sensitivity of 95%).¹ Panel A in Figure 1 demonstrates a MCE perfusion defect in a patient presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who was subsequently ruled in for an AMI. The success of reperfusion and degree of myocardial salvage are equally important to know in patients even with ST-elevation AMI. Coronary angiography is not reliable in this regard.²

View larger version (76K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. MCE images of a patient with coronary occlusion (left panel) and reperfusion (right panel) after intravenous administration of microbubbles. Arrows indicate the extent of perfusion defect. Reprinted from Kaul S, Myocardial contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction. In Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Update 1, vol 2, No. 4). Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2000. Used with permission.

The success of attempted reperfusion can also be accurately assessed with MCE. Most currently used clinical and electrocardiographic parameters are accurate . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Pries, H. Habazettl, G. Ambrosio, P. R. Hansen, J. C. Kaski, V. Schachinger, H. Tillmanns, G. Vassalli, I. Tritto, M. Weis, et al. A review of methods for assessment of coronary microvascular disease in both clinical and experimental settings Cardiovasc Res, June 25, 2008; (2008) cvn136v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sezer, H. Oflaz, T. Goren, I. Okcular, B. Umman, Y. Nisanci, A. K. Bilge, Y. Sanli, M. Meric, and S. Umman Intracoronary Streptokinase after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N. Engl. J. Med., May 3, 2007; 356(18): 1823 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. A. Centurion The Open Artery Hypothesis: Beneficial Effects and Long-term Prognostic Importance of Patency of the Infarct-Related Coronary Artery Angiology, February 1, 2007; 58(1): 34 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. F. Armstrong and W. A. Zoghbi Stress Echocardiography: Current Methodology and Clinical Applications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1739 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, A. Losada, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, D. Garcia, M. Pellicer, F. J. Chorro, and A. Llacer Usefulness of quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography to analyze microvasculature perfusion in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an open infarct-related artery: comparison with intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 164 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matsumoto, T. Asano, K. Mano, H. Tachibana, M. Todoh, M. Tanaka, and F. Kajiya Regional myocardial perfusion under exchange transfusion with liposomal hemoglobin: in vivo and in vitro studies using rat hearts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1909 - H1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]