Published online before print July 19, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137826.09715.9C
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2004;110:744-749.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
Thrombolysis Compared With Heparin for the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials
From the School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia (S.W., J.W.E.), Perth, West Australia; Department of Radiology (D.J.Q.), King’s College Hospital, London, UK; and Department of Internal Medicine (G.A.), University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Correspondence to Dr John W. Eikelboom, Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street, Perth, West Australia 6001. E-mail john.eikelboom{at}health.wa.gov.au
Received January 16, 2004; de novo received February 9, 2004; revision received May 4, 2004; accepted May 7, 2004.
Background— Randomized trials and meta-analyses have reached conflicting conclusions about the role of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.
Methods and Results— We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized trials comparing thrombolytic therapy with heparin in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eleven trials, involving 748 patients, were included. Compared with heparin, thrombolytic therapy was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in recurrent pulmonary embolism or death (6.7% versus 9.6%; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.12, P for heterogeneity=0.48), a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding (9.1% versus 6.1%; OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.46), and a significant increase in nonmajor bleeding (22.7% versus 10.0%; OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.54; number needed to harm=8). Thrombolytic therapy compared with heparin was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent pulmonary embolism or death in trials that also enrolled patients with major (hemodynamically unstable) pulmonary embolism (9.4% versus 19.0%; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.92; number needed to treat=10) but not in trials that excluded these patients (5.3% versus 4.8%; OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.30), with significant heterogeneity between these 2 groups of trials (P=0.10).
Conclusions— Currently available data provide no evidence for a benefit of thrombolytic therapy compared with heparin for the initial treatment of unselected patients with acute pulmonary embolism. A benefit is suggested in those at highest risk of recurrence or death. The number of patients enrolled in randomized trials to date is modest, and further evaluation of the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of high-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism appears warranted.
Key Words: embolism • meta-analysis • thrombolysis • heparin
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. V Konstantinides Acute pulmonary embolism revisited: Thromboembolic venous disease Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 795 - 802. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Schulman, R. J. Beyth, C. Kearon, and M. N. Levine Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant and Thrombolytic Treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 257S - 298S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kearon, S. R. Kahn, G. Agnelli, S. Goldhaber, G. E. Raskob, and A. J. Comerota Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 454S - 545S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Laporte, P. Mismetti, H. Decousus, F. Uresandi, R. Otero, J. L. Lobo, M. Monreal, and the RIETE Investigators Clinical Predictors for Fatal Pulmonary Embolism in 15 520 Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: Findings From the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1711 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Otero, J. Trujillo-Santos, A. Cayuela, C. Rodriguez, M. Barron, J. J. Martin, M. Monreal, and and the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Tr Haemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism in the RIETE Registry: systolic blood pressure or shock index? Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1111 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Shaughnessy Massive Pulmonary Embolism Crit. Care Nurse, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 39 - 50. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Balachandran, R. Adachi, and E. M. Marom Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 39 - 40. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Z. Goldhaber Thrombolytic Therapy for Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Who Are Hemodynamically Stable But Have Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Pro Arch Intern Med, October 24, 2005; 165(19): 2197 - 2199. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Thabut and D. Logeart Thrombolysis for Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction: Con Arch Intern Med, October 24, 2005; 165(19): 2200 - 2203. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Z. Goldhaber Rebuttal Arch Intern Med, October 24, 2005; 165(19): 2204 - 2204. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Kucher and S. Z. Goldhaber Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, July 12, 2005; 112(2): e28 - e32. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Elliott and S. Stevens Review: thrombolytic treatment does not reduce the risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism and death more than heparin Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2005; 10(2): 41 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. van den Berg Review: no evidence exists that thrombolysis is better than heparin for reducing the risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism and death Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2005; 8(2): 52 - 52. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. J. Schoepf, N. Kucher, F. Kipfmueller, R. Quiroz, P. Costello, and S. Z. Goldhaber Right Ventricular Enlargement on Chest Computed Tomography: A Predictor of Early Death in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, November 16, 2004; 110(20): 3276 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Fibrinolytics for PE: Useful Only in Unstable Patients Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 27, 2004; 2004(1027): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|