| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;114:1310-1314.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine |
From Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Correspondence to A.M. Gotto, Jr, c/o Jesse Jou, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, 445 E 69th St, Olin Hall 205, New York, NY 10021. E-mail amg_editorial@med.cornell.edu
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
2) risk factors and a 10-year CHD risk
20%, (3) those with no contraindications to statins, and (4) those with a favorable likelihood of experiencing benefit versus risk.
Response by Barter and Rye p 1314
After reviewing the evidence to date, a joint session of the FDAs Nonprescription Drugs Advisory and Endocrine and Metabolic Drugs Advisory committees again did not endorse the application.5 Despite these stumbling blocks, the appropriateness of OTC statins remains an important topic for the future of primary cardiovascular disease prevention. If further progress is to be made, advocates for OTC statins must address the concerns of the FDA panel and other critics.
| Challenges of Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, September 30, 2006; 333(7570): 710 - 710. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |