Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:2802-2808
Published online before print November 19, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.704064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/24/2802    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.704064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, L. O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2007;116:2802-2808.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Influence of a Pressure Gradient Distal to Implanted Bare-Metal Stent on In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Lisette Okkels Jensen, MD, PhD; Per Thayssen, MD, DMSci; Leif Thuesen, MD, DMSci; Henrik Steen Hansen, MD, DMSci; Jens Flensted Lassen, MD, PhD; Henning Kelbaek, MD, DMSci; Anders Junker, MD, PhD; Knud Noerregaard Hansen, MD; Hans Erik Boetker, MD, PhD, DMSci; Lars Romer Krusell, MD, DMSci; Knud Erik Pedersen, MD, DMSci

From the Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense (L.O.J., P.T., H.S.H., A.J., K.N.H., K.E.P.); Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus (L.T., J.F.L., H.E.B., L.R.K.); and Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (H.K.), Denmark.

Correspondence to Lisette Okkels Jensen, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Catheterization Laboratory, Odense University Hospital, Sdr Blvd 29, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. E-mail okkels{at}dadlnet.dk

Received March 20, 2007; accepted September 14, 2007.

Background— Fractional flow reserve predicts cardiac events after coronary stent implantation. The aim of the present study was to assess the 9-month angiographic in-stent restenosis rate in the setting of optimal stenting and a persisting gradient distal to the stent as assessed by a pressure wire pullback recording in the entire length of the artery.

Methods and Results— In 98 patients with angina pectoris, 1 de novo coronary lesion was treated with a bare-metal stent. After stent implantation, pressure wire measurements (Pd=mean hyperemic coronary pressure and Pa=mean aortic pressure) were performed in the target vessel: (1) Pd/Pa as distal to the artery as possible (fractional flow reserve per definition); (2) Pd/Pa just distal to the stent; (3) Pd/Pa just proximal to the stent; and (4) Pd/Pa at the ostium. Residual abnormal Pd/Pa was defined as a pressure drop between Pd/Pa measured at points 1 and 2. Fractional flow reserve distal to the artery after stenting was significantly lower (0.88±0.21 versus 0.97±0.05; P<0.001), and angiographic in-stent binary restenosis rate was significantly higher (44.0% versus 8.1%; P<0.001) in vessels with a residual abnormal Pd/Pa. Residual abnormal Pd/Pa (odds ratio, 4.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 18.16; P=0.034), reference vessel size (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.69; P=0.013), and stent length (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.21; P=0.009) were predictors of angiographic in-stent restenosis after 9 months.

Conclusions— A residual abnormal Pd/Pa distal to a bare-metal stent was an independent predictor of in-stent restenosis after implantation of a coronary bare-metal stent.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE