This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MURATA, K. Articles by SEKI, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MURATA, K. Articles by SEKI, M.

(Circulation. 1967;35:172.)
© 1967 American Heart Association, Inc.

---

Some Pitfalls of Vectorcardiographic Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction with Particular Respect to Emphysema

KAZUHIKO MURATA M.D.¹; SATORU MATSUSHITA M.D.¹; HIROSHI KURIHARA M.D.¹; MASUJI SEKI M.D.¹

¹ From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo and Yokufukai Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Vectorcardiographic changes indicating old myocardial infarction were observed in eight of 288 patients who at autopsy did not show extensive myocardial disease. Of these eight patients four had been given a misdiagnosis of anteroseptal infarction, while four had been suspected of having anterolateral or anterior infarction on the basis of an abnormal configuration of the initial portion of the QRS loop. The possibility of overdiagnosis of myocardial infarction should be borne in mind in reading vectorcardiograms, especially in the absence of clear-cut history of the condition.

A prominent Q wave simulating anteroseptal or anterior infarction was observed in lead V₂ or V₃, or in both in 12-lead electrocardiograms in all these eight cases. A high incidence of coronary sclerosis, scattered myocardial fibrosis and pulmonary emphysema was noted in these false positive cases at autopsy, but right ventricular hypertrophy, significant septal hypertrophy, or giant right atrium was not demonstrated.

Key Words: Myocardial fibrosis • Diagnostic error of myocardial infarction