Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1981;63:826-832

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zaret, B. L.

Circulation, Vol 63, 826-832, Copyright © 1981 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Imaging the inflammatory response to acute myocardial infarction in man using indium-111-labeled autologous platelets

RA Davies, ML Thakur, HJ Berger, FJ Wackers, A Gottschalk and BL Zaret

The feasibility of imaging the inflammatory response to acute transmural myocardial infarction in man using biologically active indium-111 (111In)-labeled autologous leukocytes was assessed in 36 patients. Indium-111 leukocytes (approximately 500 microCi) were injected i.v. 18-112 hours after the onset of chest pain. Cardiac imaging was performed 24 hours later with a mobile gamma camera. Twenty- one patients had positive images and 15 had negative images. The percent of positive images increased as the interval between infarction and 111In-leukocyte injection shortened; all patients injected within 24 hours of infarction had positive images. Patients with positive images were injected with 111In leukocytes earlier after infarction (mean +/- SEM, 43 +/- 4 vs 63 +/- 7 hours; p less than 0.05) and were younger (53 +/- 2 vs 65 +/- 3 years; p less than 0.05) than those with negative images. Several other parameters that could possibly have affected the imaging results were examined and were not significantly different in patients with positive and negative images. These included peak serum creatine kinase, location of infarction, incidence of pericarditis, use of antiinflammatory drugs (aspirin and indomethacin) or membrane-active antiarrhythmic drugs (lidocaine and procainamide), peripheral leukocyte count and cell labeling efficiency. The function of the labeled cell was similar in patients with positive and negative images. Six patients with acute infarction serving as controls and given free 111In oxine and six patients with stable coronary artery disease given 111In leukocytes all had negative cardiac images.