Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1984;70:672-680

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, F. R.

Circulation, Vol 70, 672-680, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A new scintigraphic method for determining left ventricular volumes

K Nichols, MH Adatepe, GH Isaacs, OM Powell, DE Pittman, TC Gay and FR Begg

A new scintigraphic count-based method for measuring absolute left ventricular volumes is presented. It is a fast and simple technique that allows geometrical assumptions to be avoided and is free of radiation attenuation corrections. This method requires the acquisition of an image of the left ventricle in the right anterior oblique projection and the collection of gated blood pool images in the left anterior oblique projection. To assess the accuracy of the method scintigraphic stroke volumes were compared with those derived from thermodilution measurements during cardiac catheterization in 20 subjects, and to assess its precision the technique was applied to phantom data of known radionuclide volumes. Excellent correlations were found between the scintigraphic and both the thermodilution (r = .98) and phantom data (r = .99). The reproducibility (r = .97) of results was investigated by repeating data acquisition and analysis for 15 subjects on two different days, and the interobserver variability (r = .97) of the method was studied by having two computer operators calculate volumes for the same patient data for 20 randomly selected studies.