Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1987;75:1154-1161

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.

Circulation, Vol 75, 1154-1161, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis?

F Zijlstra, J van Ommeren, JH Reiber and PW Serruys

To study the relationship between the quantitatively assessed coronary artery dimensions and the regional coronary flow reserve as measured by digital subtraction cineangiography, we investigated 17 coronary arteries with a single discrete proximal stenosis and 12 normal coronary arteries before and after intracoronary administration of papaverine. Coronary flow reserve was found to be curvilinearly related to minimal luminal cross-sectional area (r = .92, SEE = 0.73) and to percentage area stenosis (r = .92, SEE = 0.74). Normal coronary arteries had a coronary flow reserve of 5.0 (+/- 0.8 [SD]), which differed significantly from the coronary flow reserve of the coronary arteries with obstructive disease, in which values ranging from 0.5 to 3.9 were found. Coronary arteries with a percentage area stenosis between 50% and 70% and a minimal luminal cross-sectional area between 2 and 4.5 mm2 differed significantly (p = .001), with respect to the coronary flow reserve, from coronary arteries with a percentage area stenosis in excess of 70% and a minimal luminal cross-sectional area less than 2 mm2. With the use of hemodynamic equations that describe the pressure loss over a stenosis, a theoretical pressure-flow relationship can be inferred that characterizes the severity of the stenosis. Based on this theoretical pressure-flow relationship, coronary arteries that have a limited coronary flow reserve and critical stenosis (distal coronary perfusion pressure below 40 mm Hg at coronary flow of 3 ml/sec) can be identified with high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (82%). Thus, in coronary artery disease the consequent reduction in coronary flow reserve can be predicted with reasonable accuracy by quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
P. A. Kaufmann, M. Namdar, F. Matthew, M. Roffi, S. V. Aschkenasy, B. van der Loo, G. Sutsch, T. F. Luscher, and R. Jenni
Novel Doppler Assessment of Intracoronary Volumetric Flow Reserve: Validation Against PET in Patients With or Without Flow-Dependent Vasodilation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1272 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Namdar, T. F. Hany, P. Koepfli, P. T. Siegrist, C. Burger, C. A. Wyss, T. F. Luscher, G. K. von Schulthess, and P. A. Kaufmann
Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Feasibility Study
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 930 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
U. Ravnskov
Is atherosclerosis caused by high cholesterol?
QJM, June 1, 2002; 95(6): 397 - 403.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. F. Wilson
Assessing the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenoses
N. Engl. J. Med., June 27, 1996; 334(26): 1735 - 1737.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Molloi, A. Ersahin, J. Tang, J. Hicks, and C. Y. Leung
Quantification of Volumetric Coronary Blood Flow With Dual-Energy Digital Subtraction Angiography
Circulation, May 15, 1996; 93(10): 1919 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. De Bruyne, J. Bartunek, S. U. Sys, and G. R. Heyndrickx
Relation Between Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve Calculated From Coronary Pressure Measurements and Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia
Circulation, July 1, 1995; 92(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
R. Altstidl, H. Dill, M. Regenfus, H. Lehmkuhl, and K. Bachmann
Prestenotic and Poststenotic Flow Measurement to Assess Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 1995; 29(3): 189 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. Dill, R. Altstidl, M. Regenfus, H. Lehmkuhl, and K. Bachmann
Doppler Flow Velocity Measurements During Coronary Angioplasty
Angiology, October 1, 1994; 45(10): 877 - 882.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. J. Young, L. S. Fried, J. M. Eisenberg, J. C. Hershey, and S. V. Williams
The Single-cutoff Trap: Implications for Bayesian Analysis of Stress Electrocardiograms
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1989; 9(3): 176 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. J. Popma and G. J. Dehmer
Care of the Patient after Coronary Angioplasty
Ann Intern Med, April 1, 1989; 110(7): 547 - 559.
[Abstract] [PDF]