Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1989;80:106-111

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wessel, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wessel, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Congenital Heart Defects
*Exercise for Children
*Exercise and Physical Fitness

Circulation, Vol 80, 106-111, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Exercise response before and after termination of atrial tachycardia after congenital heart disease surgery

HU Wessel, DW Benson Jr, EA Braunlin, A Dunnigan and MH Paul
Children's Memorial Hospital, Willis J. Potts Children's Heart Center, McGaw Medical Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60614.

We studied exercise performance before and after conversion of atrial tachycardia to sinus rhythm, atrial bradycardia, or junctional rhythm in 10 patients 9-25 years of age 8-20 years after congenital heart disease surgery (complete transposition of the great arteries, seven of 10 patients). The same maximal cycle (five of 10 patients) or treadmill (five of 10 patients) exercise protocol was performed in atrial tachycardia and sinus rhythm 1-232 days after atrial tachycardia (mean, 34 days). Electrocardiogram, heart rate, and pulmonary gas exchange were recorded. Sinus rhythm exercise increased peak VO2 (mean, 28.7 [sinus rhythm] vs. 24.7 [atrial tachycardia], p less than 0.01), exercise time (p less than 0.01), and O2 pulse at rest (p less than 0.01) and at peak exercise (NS). Mean resting heart rate decreased from 109 to 70 beats/min (p less than 0.01). In atrial tachycardia, peak exercise heart rate was low (80-163 beats/min) because of fixed conduction (six of 10 patients) or high as conduction approached 1:1 (176-252 beats/min) (four of 10 patients). In sinus rhythm, rest to peak exercise heart rate increased in six of 10 patients (p less than 0.05). The data show improved exercise performance in sinus rhythm primarily because of improved heart rate adaptation to exercise, by either permitting increased heart rate response or eliminating excessively high heart rate with inadequate diastolic filling.