This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weaver, W. D. Articles by Copass, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weaver, W. D. Articles by Copass, M. K.

Circulation, Vol 82, 2027-2034, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Effect of epinephrine and lidocaine therapy on outcome after cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation

WD Weaver, CE Fahrenbruch, DD Johnson, AP Hallstrom, LA Cobb and MK Copass
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

One hundred ninety-nine patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest persisted in ventricular fibrillation after the first defibrillation attempt and were then randomly assigned to receive either epinephrine or lidocaine before the next two shocks. The resulting electrocardiographic rhythms and outcomes for each group of patients were compared for each group and also compared with results during the prior 2 years, a period when similar patients primarily received sodium bicarbonate as initial adjunctive therapy. Asystole occurred after defibrillation with threefold frequency after repeated injection of lidocaine (15 of 59, 25%) compared with patients treated with epinephrine (four of 55, 7%) (p less than 0.02). There was no difference in the proportion of patients resuscitated after treatment with either lidocaine or epinephrine (51 of 106, 48% vs. 50 of 93, 54%) and in the proportion surviving (18, 19% vs. 21, 20%), respectively. Resuscitation (64% vs. 50%, p less than 0.005) but not survival rates (24% vs. 20%) were higher during the prior 2-year period in which initial adjunctive drug treatment for persistent ventricular fibrillation primarily consisted of a continuous infusion of sodium bicarbonate. The negative effect of lidocaine or epinephrine treatment was explained in part by their influence on delaying subsequent defibrillation attempts. Survival rates were highest (30%) in a subset of patients who received no drug therapy between shocks. We conclude that currently recommended doses of epinephrine and lidocaine are not useful for improving outcome in patients who persist in ventricular fibrillation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-58 - IV-66. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Dorian, D. Cass, B. Schwartz, R. Cooper, R. Gelaznikas, and A. Barr Amiodarone as Compared with Lidocaine for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., March 21, 2002; 346(12): 884 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Ewy and J. P. Ornato Emergency cardiac care: introduction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 825 - 880. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. N. Singh Initial Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy During Resuscitation from Sudden Cardiac Death: A Time for a Fundamental Change in Strategy? Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(1): 3 - 9. [PDF]

				P. J. Kudenchuk, L. A. Cobb, M. K. Copass, R. O. Cummins, A. M. Doherty, C. E. Fahrenbruch, A. P. Hallstrom, W. A. Murray, M. Olsufka, and T. Walsh Amiodarone for Resuscitation after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., September 16, 1999; 341(12): 871 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A A J Adgey and P W Johnston Approaches to modern management of cardiac arrest Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 397 - 401. [Full Text]

				D A Chamberlain Antiarrhythmic drugs in resuscitation Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 408 - 411. [Full Text]

				G. H. Bardy, F. E. Marchlinski, A. D. Sharma, S. J. Worley, R. M. Luceri, R. Yee, B. D. Halperin, C. L. Fellows, T. S. Ahern, D. A. Chilson, et al. Multicenter Comparison of Truncated Biphasic Shocks and Standard Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks for Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2507 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				U M Guly, R G Mitchell, R Cook, D J Steedman, and C E Robertson Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital BMJ, April 29, 1995; 310(6987): 1091 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support JAMA, October 28, 1992; 268(16): 2199 - 2241. [Abstract] [PDF]