This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Csanadi, Z. Articles by Li, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Csanadi, Z. Articles by Li, H.

(Circulation. 1995;91:2614-2618.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Effect of Dual Atrioventricular Node Pathways on Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia

Zoltan Csanadi, MD; George J. Klein, MD; Raymond Yee, MD; Ranjan K. Thakur, MD; Huagui Li, MD

From the Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr George J. Klein, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Rd, London, Ontario, Canada.

Background Dual atrioventricular (AV) node pathway physiology is frequently observed in patients with AV accessory pathways.

Methods and Results To examine the implications of this, we identified 36 patients (19 men and 17 women; mean±SD age, 30±13 years) with both phenomena. The 36 patients had 48 accessory pathways. Twenty-seven patients had bidirectional and 9 had unidirectional accessory pathways. Of the 34 patients with inducible atrioventricular reentry, 17 used the slow and 11 used the fast anterograde AV node pathway exclusively during AV reentrant tachycardia, whereas 6 patients used both the fast and the slow AV node pathways. AV node reentrant tachycardia was inducible in addition to AV reentry in 7 patients. Both the cycle length and AH intervals were significantly longer during slow pathway–dependent (cycle length, 411±58 milliseconds [ms]; AH, 229±42 ms) than during fast pathway–dependent (cycle length, 322±40 ms; AH, 121±25 ms; P<.05) reentrant tachycardias. Two patients had only AV node reentrant tachycardia inducible despite the presence of the accessory pathway. Four patients with technically difficult accessory pathways were managed by AV node modification with slow pathway (3) or fast pathway (1) ablation. Three of them remained free of symptoms 7, 14, and 25 months after the procedure whereas 1 patient had recurrence of arrhythmia.

Conclusions AV reentrance with dual AV node pathways frequently depends exclusively on either the slow or the fast AV node pathway for clinical tachycardia. This may provide additional options for ablation in technically difficult cases when the accessory pathway is not otherwise problematic.

Key Words: atrioventricular node • physiology • tachycardia

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Pappone, V. Santinelli, F. Manguso, G. Augello, O. Santinelli, G. Vicedomini, S. Gulletta, P. Mazzone, V. Tortoriello, A. Pappone, et al. A Randomized Study of Prophylactic Catheter Ablation in Asymptomatic Patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med., November 6, 2003; 349(19): 1803 - 1811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Maury, M. Zimmermann, and J. Metzger Distinction between atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia and atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia in the adult population based on P wave location: Should we reconsider the value of some ECG criteria according to gender and age? Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(1): 57 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Belhassen, R. Fish, S. Viskin, A. Glick, M. Glikson, and M. Eldar Adenosine-5'-triphosphate test for the noninvasive diagnosis of concealed accessory pathway J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-A. Chen, C.-E. Chiang, C.-T. Tai, S.-H. Lee, C.-W. Chiou, K.-C. Ueng, Z.-C. Wen, C.-C. Cheng, and M.-S. Chang Longitudinal Clinical and Electrophysiological Assessment of Patients With Symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome and Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, June 1, 1996; 93(11): 2023 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text]