This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Caracciolo, E. A. Articles by Chaitman, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Caracciolo, E. A. Articles by Chaitman, B. R.

(Circulation. 1995;91:2335-2344.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Comparison of Surgical and Medical Group Survival in Patients With Left Main Equivalent Coronary Artery Disease

Long-term CASS Experience

Presented in part at the American College of Cardiology 42nd Scientific Session, Anaheim, Calif, March 16, 1993, and published as an abstract (J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:152A).

Eugene A. Caracciolo, MD; Kathryn B. Davis, PhD; George Sopko, MD; George C. Kaiser, MD; Scott D. Corley, MS; Hartzell Schaff, MD; Herman A. Taylor, MD; Bernard R. Chaitman, MD; for the CASS Investigators

From the St Louis (Mo) University Health Sciences Center (E.A.C., G.C.K., B.R.C.); the University of Washington (K.B.D., S.D.C.), Seattle; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (G.S.), Bethesda, Md; the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation (H.S.), Rochester, Minn; and the University of Alabama Medical Center (H.A.T.), Birmingham.

Background Combined severe proximal left anterior descending and proximal left circumflex coronary artery disease, or left main equivalent (LMEQ) disease, defines a prognostic high-risk angiographic subset of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. While numerous observational and randomized clinical trials showed prolonged survival in surgically compared with medically treated patients with left main coronary artery disease, relatively few observational studies compared surgical and medical therapies in patients with LMEQ disease. The present report of 912 patients with LMEQ disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMEQ patient subgroups.

Methods and Results The CASS Registry contains 912 patients with LMEQ disease, defined as combined stenoses of 70% in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery before the first septal perforator and proximal circumflex coronary artery before the first obtuse marginal branch, initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 44% for the 630 patients in the surgical group and 31% for the 282 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.1 years (12.7 to 14.1 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.2 years (4.8 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.9 years; P<.0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, and coronary anatomy. However, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (70%) also was present, and (2) mildly abnormal (LV score, 6 to 10) LV systolic function. The 15-year cumulative survival in patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 63% and 54%, respectively. Median survival was >15 years in both the surgical and medical groups (P=NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and right coronary artery stenosis 70%, the 15-year cumulative survival was also similar in the surgical and medical groups (63% and 53%, respectively). Median survival was >15 years in both the surgical and medical groups (P=NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates in all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical group survival curves caused by a disproportionate increase in late surgical group mortality. Overall, 26% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 65% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years. When the CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease who participated in the randomized trial or who were randomizable were analyzed, CABG surgery did not prolong the 15-year cumulative survival estimates compared with nonsurgical therapy for randomized (71% versus 67%, respectively) and for randomizable patients (62% versus 92%, respectively) with an LV ejection fraction 50%.

Conclusions This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (70%) also was present or in patients with an LV ejection fraction 50% who participated in the CASS randomized trial or who were randomizable. These results extend our understanding of the natural history of LMEQ disease and permit a more accurate estimate of long-term surgical and medical group survival. These long-term results should allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about the best choice of treatment available for patients with similar clinical and angiographic features.

Key Words: coronary disease • bypass • surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Shemin Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Where Lies the Body of Proof? Circulation, December 2, 2008; 118(23): 2326 - 2329. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Seung, D.-W. Park, Y.-H. Kim, S.-W. Lee, C. W. Lee, M.-K. Hong, S.-W. Park, S.-C. Yun, H.-C. Gwon, M.-H. Jeong, et al. Stents versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease N. Engl. J. Med., April 24, 2008; 358(17): 1781 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Taggart, S. Kaul, W. E. Boden, T. B. Ferguson Jr, R. A. Guyton, M. J. Mack, P. T. Sergeant, R. J. Shemin, P. K. Smith, and S. Yusuf Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 885 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Lopes, F. d. S. Paulitsch, A. F. Gois, A. C. Pereira, N. A. Stolf, L. O. Dallan, J. A.F. Ramires, and W. A. Hueb Impact of number of vessels disease on outcome of patients with stable coronary artery disease: 5-year follow-up of the Medical, Angioplasty, and bypass Surgery Study (MASS) Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 349 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Landesberg and M. Mosseri PRO: Preoperative Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 759 - 763. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Teirstein Unprotected Left Main Intervention: Patient Selection, Operator Technique, and Clinical Outcomes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Sabik III, E. H. Blackstone, M. Firstenberg, and B. W. Lytle A Benchmark for Evaluating Innovative Treatment of Left Main Coronary Disease Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-232 - I-239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Taggart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Still the Best Treatment for Multivessel and Left Main Disease, But Patients Need to Know Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 1966 - 1975. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mehta and B. Meier Coronary revascularization, when it needs to be done it needs to be done Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2001; 22(8): 617 - 618. [PDF]

				M. Yeatman, M. Caputo, R. Ascione, F. Ciulli, and G. D. Angelini Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 19(3): 239 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A K Nightingale, C J Burrell, and A J Marshall Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: natural history and normal pregnancies Heart, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 629 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. F. Davies, A. D. Goldberg, S. Forman, C. J. Pepine, G. L. Knatterud, N. Geller, G. Sopko, C. Pratt, J. Deanfield, and C. R. Conti Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study Two-Year Follow-up : Outcomes of Patients Randomized to Initial Strategies of Medical Therapy Versus Revascularization Circulation, April 15, 1997; 95(8): 2037 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. W. Emery, N. L. Mills, F. J. Teijeira, K. V. Arom, P. Baldwin, R. J. Petersen, L. D. Joyce, G. L. B. Grinnan, M. S. Sussman, J. G. Copeland III, et al. North American Experience With the Perma-Flow Prosthetic Coronary Graft Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1996; 62(3): 691 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Long-Term Benefits of Left Main Coronary Surgery Journal Watch Cardiology, July 1, 1995; 1995(701): 16 - 16. [Full Text]

				LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT MAIN CORONARY DISEASE Journal Watch (General), May 12, 1995; 1995(512): 1 - 1. [Full Text]