(Circulation. 1995;92:3082-3088.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Medical Clinic I, Charité Hospital, Berlin, Germany (P.C.F.); Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (R.E.I., R.G.W.); Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center (R.L.C.), and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies, Department of Biomedical Engineering of the School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (S.F.I.); and the I. Medical Clinic, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany (E.U.A.).
Correspondence to Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Volker Hall G78A, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019.
Background In previous studies, epicardial patch electrodes decreased transthoracic defibrillation efficacy. We studied the effects of two inactive epicardial 14-cm2 titanium mesh patches on defibrillation energy requirements with nonthoracotomy internal lead configurations.
Methods and Results A 6/6-millisecond biphasic shock waveform was
delivered via several electrode configurations 10 seconds after
ventricular fibrillation was initiated with a 60-Hz
generator. In two series, a total of 16 dogs (weight, 23.3±2.4 kg)
underwent an up-down defibrillation protocol. In the first series,
the defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined for each electrode
configuration in the presence of two inactive epicardial patches. In
the second series, DFTs were determined in the presence of an inactive
right ventricular (RV) or left ventricular (LV)
patch alone. For several nonthoracotomy lead configurations tested in
the first 8 dogs, the mean±SD DFT energy increased 49% to 97% with
two inactive patches on the heart compared with no patches on the heart
as follows: RV to superior vena caval (SVC) electrode, from 8.9±2.6 to
18.0±14.3 J; RV to SVC plus subcutaneous array electrode, from
7.0±2.4 to 10.7±5.3 J; RV to subcutaneous pectoral plate
electrode,
from 6.2±1.3 to 11.4±4.0 J (P
.05). The lowest DFT
was
achieved by defibrillating between the epicardial patches (3.8±3.3 J).
The second series showed that DFT voltage requirements increased
significantly for all three nonthoracotomy lead configurations with the
inactive LV patch alone (P
.05) but not with the inactive
RV patch alone.
Conclusions Inactive epicardial patches can significantly increase the defibrillation energy requirements for nonthoracotomy lead configurations. This negative impact may be due to an insulating effect of the patches and to a disturbance of the potential gradient field under the patches. If the same holds true in patients, these results have clinical implications. Functioning epicardial patch leads should be incorporated in the defibrillation lead system if already present. If the LV patch is nonfunctioning, such as because of a lead fracture, the marked increase in DFT due to an inactive LV patch calls for thorough DFT testing during surgery and, in selected patients, may necessitate patch removal to produce an effective transvenous-based system.
Key Words: defibrillation death sudden fibrillation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Paisey, A. M. Yue, F. Bessoule, P. R. Roberts, and J. M. Morgan Passive electrode effect reduces defibrillation threshold in bi-filament middle cardiac vein defibrillation. Europace, February 1, 2006; 8(2): 113 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |